Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Plan Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Plan Number - S10-024
Review Name: TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 06/21/2010 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 06/22/2010 | RONALD BROWN | ADA | REVIEW | Passed | Not a COT owned or operated property |
| 06/24/2010 | MARTIN BROWN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | |
| 07/02/2010 | LIZA CASTILLO | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Approved | SUBJECT: ALAMO LOFTS S10-024 Tucson Electric Power Company (TEP) has reviewed the tentative plat submitted June 22, 2010. TEP is approves the plat. TEP will provide a preliminary electrical design on the Approved Tentative Plat within fifteen (15) working days upon receipt of the plat. Additional plans necessary for preparation of the design are: building plans including water, electrical, landscape, sidewalk and paving plans. Also, submit the AutoCAD version of the plat on a CD or email to lcastillo@tep.com <mailto:lcastillo@tep.com> . Should you have any questions, please contact me at (520) 917-8745. Liza Castillo Right of Way Agent II Tucson Electric Power Co. UniSource Energy Services offc-(520) 917-8745 fax-(520) 545-1416 lcastillo@tep.com <mailto:lcastillo@tep.com> |
| 07/19/2010 | JENNIFER STEPHENS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Approved | 201 N. STONE AV., 2ND FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 AUDREY FARENGA ADDRESSING REVIEW PH #: 740-6800 FAX #: 623-5411 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: AUDREY FARENGA, ADDRESSING REVIEW SUBJECT: S10-024 ALAMO LOFTS/TENTATIVE PLAT DATE: July 19, 2010 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and we hereby approve this project. On the Final Plat include resubdivision information on all Title Blocks. 1.) All addresses will need to be displayed per Pima County Address Standards at the time of final inspection. ***The Pima County Addressing Section can use digital CAD drawing files when submitted with your final plat Mylar. These CAD files can be submitted through Pima County Addressing. The digital CAD drawing files expedite the addressing and permitting processes when we are able to insert this digital data into the County's Geographic Information System. Your support is greatly appreciated.*** |
| 07/19/2010 | FRODRIG2 | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Planning and Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: Alamo Lofts Development Package (1st Review) S10-024 TRANSMITTAL DATE: July 19, 2010 DUE DATE: July 20, 2010 DEVELOPMENT PLAN COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. Section 5.3.8.2, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a development package. If, at the end of that time, the development package has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this development plan is June 21, 2011 2. This development package was reviewed for compliance with the City of Tucson Development Standards (D.S.) and Land Use Code (LUC) for full code compliance. 3. D.S. 2-01.2.5 A three (3) inch by five (5) inch space shall be reserved in the lower right quadrant of each sheet for an approval stamp. 4. D.S. 2-01.3.2.B As the proposed subdivision is a resubdivision of an existing subdivision provide a statement to the title block stating that this is a resubdivision of ALAMO LOFTS CONDOMINIUMS subdivision. 5. D.S. 2-01.3.2.E The Sheet X of X should include all 15 pages of the development package. 6. D.S. 2-01.3.3 Remove the DSMR 06-46 and General Note 21 from the plan as the DSMR approved for the condominium subdivision is not valid for this project. 7. D.S. 2-01.3.7.A.1 As the rezoning for this case has been Effectuated revise General Note 2 to read the existing zoning is R3. 8. D.S. 2-01.3.7.A.5 On residential projects, list the total number of units/lots proposed as a general note. 9. D.S. 2-01.3.7.A.8 Provide the subdivision case number S10-024 in the lower right corner of each sheet. 10. D.S. 2-01.3.7.A.9 Provide a density calculation that has the allowed and proposed based on the parcel size. 11. D.S. 2-01.3.9.C It appears that Common areas "A" & "B-1" run together. Clearly delineate the common area boundary on the plan. 12. D.S. 2-01.3.9.H.1 A Development Standards Modification Request (DSMR) will be required to move the required sidewalks from the street to the east side of the subdivision. Once approved provide the DSMR Number, date of approval, what was a approved, and any conditions of approval as a general note. 13. D.S. 2-01.3.9.V If gang mailboxes are proposed show them on the plan. 14. There are benches shown on the landscape plan that are not shown on the site plan. They appear to be within a basin. Demonstrate on the site plan how accessibility is provided to the benches. 15. The following comments are based on the Development package Submittal Requirements: a. Provide a sheet index on the master cover sheet. b. There appears to be duplication of details on the site and grading sheets. Please eliminate the duplicate details. 16. For your information a stormwater pollution prevention plan (SWPP) is required for this project. 17. Provide the elevations and photos as required by rezoning condition 5. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.com Sshield1 on DS1/planning/New Development Package/ S10-024 RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package, elevations and photos. |
| 07/19/2010 | JOHN BEALL | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Denied | DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT S10-024 Alamo Lofts Reviewed: (X) Tentative Plat (X) Landscape Plan CROSS REFERENCE: C9-05-19 GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: No COMMENTS DUE BY: July 20, 2010 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: () No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment () Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions () RCP Proposal Complies with Plan Policies (X) See Additional Comments Attached () No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: (X) Resubmittal Required: (X) Tentative Plat () Development Plan (X) Landscape Plan () Other REVIEWER: MSP 837-6971 DATE: 07/12/10 Department of Planning and Development Services Community Planning Staff S10-024 - Alamo Lofts, Tentative Plat Review July 12, 2010 The applicant has requested to change this project from a proposed condominium development plan to a fee simple tentative plat, while applying the Residential Cluster Project (RCP) RCP-7 option. According to the Land Use Code (LUC § 3.6.1.1), the purpose of the RCP is to provide greater flexibility and creativity in the design of clustered residential development. In addition, an RCP proposal must be in conformance with the design policies and criteria of the General Plan and any of its components, including adopted area and neighborhood plans (LUC § 3.6.1.4). In this instance, the site is located within the boundaries of the Arcadia-Alamo Area Plan. Also, the proposed tentative plat site is subject to rezoning case C9-05-19 (Ordinance 10370), including the conceptual land plan provided to Mayor and Council at the rezoning hearing on August 2, 2005. Taking into account the requirements listed above, and the new consideration to apply the Residential Cluster Option (RCP), staff offers the following comments: 1. Please revise tentative plat to comply with rezoning C9-05-19, condition # 5. Provide detailed colored elevations, including a color palette and materials to demonstrate compatibility with adjacent residential developments. The four-sided building elevations need to be drawn to scale to determine proposed building height(s) and must be in full size 24" X 36" sheet(s) as part of the tentative plat sheet pagination. The 24" X 36" sheet(s) shall be drawn in black & white but need to identify colors with paint codes that are to be provided in the color palette. In addition, provide in smaller print color versions [may use color pencils which best resemble the proposed color(s)] of the four-sided architectural building renderings/elevations. The color version to include a color palette that identifies each color by brand name and color code. The color versions can be submitted on a small print such as 11" X 17." 2. The proposed tentative plat, sheet 2 of 3, under keynote #4 addresses "pedestrian refuge between motor court and garage (typical)." This condition should apply to all motor courts when adjacent to garage access points. However, as submitted Keynote #4 has only been applied to the motor court sandwiched between lots 5 through 11. Please revise tentative plat, sheet 2 of 3 to show Keynote #4 on all four motor courts. Also, identify the "pedestrian refuge" area on all four motor courts and provide a new cross-section of this "typical" pedestrian refuge on sheet 3 of 3. Currently the motor court sandwiched between lots 5 through 11 does not have a cross-section on sheet 3 of 3. As a side note, if the proposed motor court "pedestrian refuge area" does not apply to the other three proposed motor courts, please explain why? 3. A City of Tucson pocket park is located approximately eight hundred feet to the west, and therefore, passive recreational improvements are appropriate for the site. Please revise tentative plat and landscape plan to show proposed passive recreational amenities (benches) within areas of "Common Area C," as meeting ADA standards for accessibility, and for each proposed bench location to have an all-weather pedestrian path up to the bench. Upon comparison of the grading plan and the landscape plan, it seems that the proposed bench locations are within the low lying water flow area of the detention/retention basins. Passive recreation amenities need to be accessible by an all-weather path and outside of the water flow basin areas. These revision should address any conflicts with the proposed grading plan 4. Outdoor lighting, whether pole lights or structural mounted lights need to comply with rezoning condition # 16. Please identify if the site will include outdoor lighting. If outdoor lighting is proposed, then as a part of this rezoning requirement, please identify location of pole light(s) or structural mounted light(s). |
| 07/20/2010 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1) Revise the landscape and all other plans and details regarding the perimeter screening requirements. The approved plans and the applicable codes call for 5' masonry walls. The conditions of rezoning also require design treatments and graffiti resistant materials. LUC Table 3.7.2-I, C9-05-19 2) Submit the native Plant Preservation Plan. 3) Add a sheet index to the cover of the development package. 4) Correct the revision letter as necessary detail any changes made to the landscape plan. |
| 07/20/2010 | PAUL MACHADO | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | To: Patricia Gehlen DATE: July 20, 2010 CDRC/Zoning Manager SUBJECT: Alamo Lofts, 6109 E. Pima Street Tentative Plat, Final Plat S09-010 and Grading Plan T10BU00987 (First Review) T14S, R14E, Section 01 SUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Final Plat, Tentative Plat, Drainage Report and Grading Plan (Development Package). The Final Plat (FP), Tentative Plat (SP), Drainage Report (DR) and Grading Plan (T10BU00987) cannot be approved as submitted. Please address the following review comments prior to the next submittal. Final Plat: 1. Please include a detailed response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the FP. 2. Submit the Subdivision Improvement Assurances for review. The following items are required in the assurance package if a Third Party Trust Agreement will be used: " Title Report " Special Warranty Deed " Trust Agreement " Amendment to Trust " Agreement to Construct 3. Submit the above documents containing original signatures, copies of the documents and signatures will not be forwarded to the City of Tucson attorney for review. 4. Please re-label all common areas that may be used in a dual and/or single use capacity per D.S. 2-03.6.4.C. For example, a Ret./Det. Basin may also be used as a recreation facility or only as a drainage facility or drainage channel and this must be reflected on the Final Plat. A key note explaining the labels could be used in conjunction with the labels, ie.: " Common Area "A" - Streets " Common Area "B" - Drainage/Recreation Facilities " Common Area "C" - Recreation Facilities " Common Area "D" - Drainage Facilities " Common Area "E" - Landscaping 3. The blanks will be completed by the Pima County Recorder's Office at the time of recordation. 4. The S(YR)-___ subdivision case number assigned to the approved tentative plat will be placed in the lower right corner of the plat next to the title block. If the property is subject to a rezoning case, the C9-__-__ rezoning case number is to be noted also. Review all relevant case numbers for expiration dates. 5. If the subdivision was the result of a rezoning case and did not require submittal and review of a tentative plat, add the following note: "Any relocation, modification, etc., of existing utilities and/or public improvements necessitated by the proposed development will be at no expense to the public." 6. If the project has common areas, label each common area individually with a separate letter designation. Enclose with a solid line each common area, private street, etc., that will have separate restrictions, a separate homeowners' association, or any common area that is separated by a public right-of-way. See following note no. 7. 7. Provide location, dimensions, areas in square footage, and purposes of lots proposed for dedication (such as open spaces, recreation areas, and natural areas) or for reservation for a public use (such as public parks, water facilities, and school sites). A common area will need to be provided for the drainage channel or be included in "Common Area C". It is preferred that a separate common area be dedicated for the drainage channel so that future lot owners are aware of their surroundings. 8. Show detention/retention areas in a surveyable and readily retraceable manner. For example, the common area dedicated for the drainage channel. 9. Indicate primary control points, or descriptions and ties to such control points, to which all dimensions, angles, bearings, and similar data on the plat will be referred. Where a coordinate system has been established by the City Engineer or County Engineer, primary control points may be referenced thereto. At least one (1) corner of the subdivision will be tied by course and distance to a section corner, a quarter section corner, or an established City or County survey monument by the monument line between the section corners. The plat must include a description of that corner marker and an indication of how the bearings were determined. Corner tie recordation information is to be provided on the plat. 10. Indicate tract boundary lines; right-of-way and centerlines of streets, easements, and other rights-of-way; and property lines of residential lots and other sites, with accurate dimensions, bearings, or deflection angles and radii, arcs, and central angles of all curves. There is a centerline and a section line (?) in Pima Street, label both as to their nature. All boundary monumentation must be labeled as "found" or "set." a. Fully describe and show all markings on found monuments. b. A one-half (½) inch iron rod tagged by a registered land surveyor will be set at all corners upon completion of construction. All corners in the subdivision, including the corners and lines of the common areas shall be indicated as "set". 11. Provide clarification on the detail for the SVT's. If the existing and future right-of-way are both 90' and both of the curb locations are 10' from the right-of-way line, then half of the 20' stem side (10') of the SVT would be located on the subdivision property. Also, the distance between both stems would a minimum of 24' since the entrance is also a min. 24'. The distances for the near side SVT is: 20'x265' and the distances for the far side SVT is: 20'x110'. Revise as required. 12. Please submit a copy of the subdivision boundary closure calculations. Tentative Plat: 1. Please include a detailed response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the TP. 2. A three (3) inch by five (5) inch space shall be reserved in the lower right quadrant of each sheet for an approval stamp per D.S. 2-01.2.5. 3. Page number and number of pages. The sheets for the entire "Plat Package" shall be paginated continuously per D.S. 2-01.2.9. 4. Review all relevant case numbers for expiration dates per D.S. 2-01.3.3.2. E. 5. Provide a sheet index on the first sheet per D.S. 2-01.3.3.5. 6. Add general note "Drainage must remain in its natural state…………" per D.S. 2-01.3.3.7.B.3.a. 7. The following information regarding existing private or public right-of-way adjacent to or within the site shall be provided:………… per D.S. 2-01.3.8.C. If the future and existing curb position (10' from r/w) are the same, then why is there a future SVT shown? 8. A common area will need to be provided for the drainage channel or be included in "Common Area C" per D.S. 2-01.3.9.C. 9. Verification will be provided that any drainage solutions which occur outside the boundaries of the development document area are constructed with adjacent owners' permission. Per D.S. 2-01.3.9.N.5. 10. Show refuse on-site collection areas, including locations of dumpsters, screening location and materials and vehicular maneuverability, fully dimensioned, and access route D.S. 2-01.3.9.T. The plan views of the refuse enclosures do not match detail J on sht. 3. Also dimension the 10'x10' clear area inside the refuse enclosure on detail J/3. 11. Provide a typical cross section between the proposed town homes. It appears that the drainage between the town homes is to typically flow within (on top of) the sidewalk (longitude) east to the water harvesting areas. As you are aware, the 10-year event must flow under all the pedestrian paths from any area. Adjust the drainage/sidewalk so that the flow is not on top of the sidewalks and show the placement and size of the sidewalk scuppers. 12. Complete or eliminate general note 20 and also complete the earthwork quantities on sht. 1. Drainage Report: 1. Please include a detailed response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the DR. 2. An addendum to the original DR will be accepted addressing the proposed changes in the drainage scheme especially the new channel at the north property line. 3. Provide details of all drainage structures in the DR. 4. Provide a typical cross section between the proposed town homes. It appears that the drainage between the town homes is to typically flow within (on top of) the sidewalk (longitude) east to the water harvesting areas. As you are aware, the 10-year event must flow under all the pedestrian paths from any area. Adjust the drainage/sidewalk so that the flow is not on top of the sidewalks and show the placement and size of the sidewalk scuppers. 5. The content and format of the Drainage Report should follow S.M.D.D.F.M., chap. II, 2.2. 6. Show the project address or administration address on the cover sheet of the DR. Grading Plan: 1. Please include a detailed response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the GP. 2. Add the following notes to the grading plan notes: " "The contractor shall remove the fine materials from the bottom of the detention/retention basin and scarify the basin bottom once the construction activities are completed in order to remove any fine material build up caused by construction and to restore soil percolation." " "Any engineering work to be done below grade (i.e. toe-downs, cutoff walls, drainage pipes/structures, etc.) shall not be back filled until Development Services Inspector inspects the work and approves it." 3. It appears that the drainage between the town homes is to typically flow within the sidewalk (longitude) east to the water harvesting areas. As you are aware, the 10-year event must flow under the pedestrian paths. Adjust the drainage and/or sidewalk so that the flow is not on top of the sidewalks and call-out the placement and size of the sidewalk scuppers. 4. Some discrepancies exist. with the numbering of the details/sections and which on page they shown. Revise as required. 5. Dimension from street monument lines to existing and proposed curbs, sidewalks, driveways, and utility lines per D.S. 2-02.2.1.21. 6. Please show dimensioned right-of-way, including any applicable Major Streets and Routes (MS&R) Plan right-of-way per D.S. 2-02.2.1.19. 7. The existing patio wall north of the North of the property is located on adjacent property and cannot be used as part of the proposed drainage channel or permission must be obtained from the owner. However, if permission by the owner to use part of his property is obtained, then "protection" must be used to protect the exist. wall and for the footings of the exist. wall, i.e.: epoxy, dirt, rip-rap etc. Revise as required. 8. Keynote no. 7 must only call-out a proposed sidewalk per COT SD 200. The 2" compacted decomposed granite path will require a DSMR. 9. Show the refuse on-site collection areas, including locations of dumpsters, screening location and materials and vehicular maneuverability, fully dimensioned, and access routes. The plan view of the refuse enclosure does not match detail E on sht. 4. Also dimension the 10'x10' clear area in the refuse enclosure on detail E/4. 10. Complete Grading Plan number (T10BU00987) on all sheets. 11. Call out and show the rip-rap w/ filter fabric on detail T/5. 12. The cross section M/5 is actually on sht. 4. Revise as required. 13. The Curb opening detail K/4 lists the opening as 1'. How wide is the opening and call out the opening on the plan view and as well as where it is applicable? 14. Perhaps showing the distances or the distances being equal between the posts barricades may be clearer to construct instead of calling out that the post barricades are to be centered in the curb opening. Revise as required. 15. The Depressed Vertical Curb detail J/4 does not detail a depressed curb. Revise as required. 16. The grading slope on the plans shown on the West edge of the subdivision differs from detail T/5. Revise as required. 17. Correct the "For Continuation of Paving notes……." on sht. 1. The continuation of the notes is on page 5, not 6. 18. Add note: "All grading shall conform to City of Tucson Development Standard No. 11-01.0 - Excavation & Grading". 19. A permit or a private improvement agreement might be necessary for any work performed within the Right-of-way. Contact Permits and Codes at (520) 791-5100 for permit information. 20. Call out all slopes and stabilization material (concrete, riprap, gabions or vegetation). 21. Show all distances of street widths on the grading plan. Stormwater pollution prevention plan: 1. The SWPPP is a plan that is a dynamic entity. Therefore the previously approved SWPPP showing the major changes on the subdivision will suffice for this project. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 837-4932 or Paul.Machado@ci.tucsonaz.govs Paul P. Machado Senior Engineering Associate City of Tucson/Development Services Department 201 N. Stone Avenue P.O. Box 27210 Tucson, Arizona 85726-7210 (520) 791-5550 x1193 office (520) 879-8010 fax C:/6109 E. Pima St CDRC DEV PKG |
| 07/20/2010 | RONALD BROWN | ZONING HC | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Please provide a genreal note to the effect that the development of this property shall follow all guidelines of City of Tucson Ordinance 10463, "Inclusive Home Design". 2. Detectable Warnings strips are required as part of a Marked Crossing through a hazardous vehicle traffic area (PAAL). All the detectable warnings shown on the plan are for access to parking ailses which are considered non vehicle areas of safe refuge. Detectable warnings are not required in these instances. END OF REVIEW |
| 07/21/2010 | JOSE ORTIZ | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Approved | |
| 07/22/2010 | JWILLIA4 | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Denied | PIMA COUNTY REGIONAL WASTEWATER RECLAMATION DEPARTMENT 201 NORTH STONE AVENUE TUCSON, ARIZONA 85701-1207 MICHAEL GRITZUK, P.E. PH: (520) 740-6500 DIRECTOR FAX: (520) 620-0135 July 21, 2010 To: DAN CASTRO RICK ENGINEERING Thru: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Manager City of Tucson Development Services Department ____________________________________________ From: Tom Porter, Sr. CEA (520-740-6719), Pima County Regional Wastewater Reclamation Department Subject: ALAMO LOFTS, LOTS 1-22 AND COMMON AREA'S "A, B-1 THRU B-6 AND C" Tentative Plat - 1st Submittal S10-024 The Pima County Regional Wastewater Reclamation Department (PCRWRD) has reviewed the proposed sewer collection lines for the above-referenced project. The following comments are offered for your use: 1. Obtain a letter from the PCRWRD's Development Liaison Unit, written within the past year, stating that treatment and conveyance system capacity for the project is available in the downstream public sewerage system and provide a copy of that letter to this office. The required form to request such a letter may be found at: http://www.pima.gov/wwm/developer.htm#permits The development plan for this project cannot be approved until a copy of this letter has been received by this office. 2. Sheet 1: Remove General Note #11. 3. Sheet 2: Call out the IMS #'s with rim and invert elevations for all of the existing public manholes on shown on plan. 4. Sheet 2: Call out the construction plan # and pipe size for the existing public sewer line shown on plan. This office will require a revised set of bluelines, and a response letter, addressing these comments. Additional comments may be made during the review of these documents. Pima County Code Title 13.20.030.A.2 requires that a wastewater review fee be paid for each submittal of the development plan. The fee for the first submittal is $166 plus $50 per sheet. For the second submittal, the review fee is $50 per sheet. For all subsequent submittals, the review fee is $39 per sheet. The next submittal of this project will be the second(2nd) submittal. A check for the review fee of this submittal in the amount of $100.00 (made out to PIMA COUNTY TREASURER) must accompany the revised set of bluelines and response letter. If the number of sheets changes, please adjust the review fee accordingly. This comment letter has been reviewed and accepted for substantial conformance to Pima County Code Title 13 by: ___________________________ Chad Amateau, P.E., Civil Engineer PCRWRD, Planning Services Section, Development Liaison Unit cc: Chad Amateau, PE Kristin Borer, PE, DLU Manager DLU Project folder |
| 07/22/2010 | JOHN WILLIAMS | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES July 22, 2010 Dan Castro Rick Engineering Company 3945 E. Fort Lowell Road # 111 Tucson, Arizona 85712 Subject: S10-024 Alamo Lofts Tentative Plat Development Package Dear Dan: Your submittal of June 21, 2010 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a set of 7 DETAILED cover letters explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLACKLINES MUST BE FOLDED 7 Copies Revised Tentative Plat, - Dev Package (Zoning, Planning, HC Site, Engineering, Landscape, Wastewater, PSD) 2 Copies Drainage Report (Engineering, PDSD) 3 Copies Color Elevations & Photo's per Rezoning Conditions 5 (Zoning, Planning, PDSD,) 1 Check Made out to "Pima County Treasurer" for $100.00 (Wastewater) Should you have any questions, please call me at 837-4917. Sincerely, John Williams Planning Technician All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: (520) |