Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Plan Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Plan Number - S09-081
Review Name: TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01/04/2010 | RONALD BROWN | ADA | REVIEW | Passed | Not a COT owned/operated project |
| 01/06/2010 | LIZA CASTILLO | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Approved | 4350 E. Irvington Road, Tucson, AZ 85714 Post Office Box 711, Tucson, AZ 85702 WR#220043 January 6, 2010 DOWL HKM Attn: Lorenzo Ortiz 166 W Alameda Street Tucson, Arizona 85701 Dear Mr. Ortiz : SUBJECT: Quiktrip Store 1470 S09-081 Tucson Electric Power Company has reviewed and approved the development plan submitted December 24, 2009. It appears that there are no conflicts with the existing facilities within the boundaries of this proposed development. Enclosed is a copy of a TEP facilities map showing the approximate location of the existing facilities. Any relocation costs will be billable to the customer. In order to apply for electric service, call the New Construction Department at (520) 918-8300. Submit a final set of plans including approved site, electrical load, paving off-site improvements and irrigation plans, if available include a CD with the AutoCAD version of the plans. If easements are required, they will be secured by separate instrument. Your final plans should be sent to: Tucson Electric Power Company Attn: Mr. ricahrd Harrington New Business Project Manager P. O. Box 711 (DB-101) Tucson, AZ 85702 520-917-8726 Should you have any technical questions, please call the area Designer Mike Kaiser at (520) 918-8244. Sincerely, Elizabeth Miranda Office Support Specialist Design/Build lm Enclosures cc: DSD_CDRC@tucsonaz.gov, City of Tucson (email) M. Kaiser, Tucson Electric Power |
| 01/06/2010 | TOM MARTINEZ | OTHER AGENCIES | AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION | Denied | >>> Tom Martinez <TMartinez@azdot.gov> 01/06/2010 11:08 AM >>> ADOT Traffic Engineering has these comments on the proposed Quik Trip development on SR-86, Ajo Way: * A Traffic Impact Analysis will need to be submitted to ADOT for review and approval of any mitigation to SR 86. * The report will address any need for acceleration and deceleration lanes along the project's frontage on SR 86. * Will there be any new dedication of right-of- way to ADOT due to the location of this project? * Any proposed mitigation to SR 86 will be done to current ADOT standards including roadway widening, curbing and sidewalks, at no cost to ADOT. Improvement plans will need to be reviewed and approved by ADOT. * Signal modifications will be needed at the intersection with Holiday Isle and be part of the improvement plans submitted to ADOT. * The width of the proposed driveway will match the width of Holiday Isle on the north side of SR 86. * The proposed driveway may be located too close to Phoebe Avenue as shown on sheet 4. * What mitigation, on SR 86, will be provided to keep any conflicts with traffic turning south to Phoebe and westbound through traffic which is a clear violation of driver's expectations? This will have a tendency demonstrate that the location of the driveway is not being suitable to ADOT Traffic due to possible same direction conflicts. Thank you. ________________________________ Confidentiality and Nondisclosure Notice: This email transmission and any attachments are intended for use by the person(s)/entity(ies) named above and may contain confidential/privileged information. Any unauthorized use, disclosure or distribution is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by email, and delete or destroy all copies plus attachments. 2009 |
| 01/14/2010 | JENNIFER STEPHENS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Denied | 201 N. STONE AV., 2ND FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 AUDREY FARENGA ADDRESSING REVIEW PH #: 740-6800 FAX #: 623-5411 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: AUDREY FARENGA, ADDRESSING REVIEW SUBJECT: S09-081 QUIK TRIP STORE #1470/DEVELOPMENT PLAN/TENTATIVE PLAT DATE: 01/11/10 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and the following matters must be resolved prior to our approval: Spell out all street suffixes except on Location Map. Delete Holiday Isle Blvd on Location Map. Change Ajo Highway to Way. Label Phoebe Avenue on Sheet 4. |
| 01/14/2010 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Denied | January 11, 2010 To: J LORENZO ORTIZ DOWL HKM Thru: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Manager City of Tucson Development Services Department ____________________________________________ From: Tom Porter, Sr. CEA (520-740-6719), representing the Pima County Departments of Regional Wastewater Reclamation Department and Environment Quality Subject: QUIKTRIP STORE #1470 Tent. Plat – 1st Submittal S09-081 The proposed sewer collection lines for the above-referenced project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Regional Wastewater Reclamation Department (PCRWRD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use. Obtain a letter from the PCWMD's Development Services Section, written within the past 90 days, stating that treatment and conveyance system capacity for the project is available in the downstream public sewerage system and provide a copy of that letter to this office. The required form to request such a letter may be found at: http://www.pima.gov/wwm/forms/docs/CapResponseRequest.pdf. The tentative or preliminary plat for this project cannot be approved until a copy of this letter has been received by this office. Sheet 1: Revise Wastewater General Note #2 to read as follows: THE ON-SITE SANITARY SEWERS, EXCEPT PUBLIC SEWERS WITHIN PUBLIC SEWER EASEMENTS OR RIGHTS-OF-WAY, WILL BE PRIVATE AND WILL BE CONSTRUCTED, OPERATED AND MAINTAINED ON A PRIVATE BASIS, AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH AN APPROVED OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE PLAN, IF REQUIRED. THE LOCATION AND METHOD OF CONNECTION TO AN EXISTING PUBLIC SANITARY SEWER IS SUBJECT TO REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE PIMA COUNTY WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT. Sheet 4: You are proposing re-alignment and abandonment of the existing public sewer. Please contact Pima County Real Property @ (520)740-6313. Sheet 4: The first proposed manhole to the east should be located in the PAAL and the sewer line should then run north to another proposed manhole just north of the property line in the ROW. A 20’ wide public sewer easement will be required for this section in the private street. The sewer line on the north edge of the property should then run along the north property line just inside the ROW to a new manhole on the existing 8” sewer line G-87-142 in Pandora Ave. Sheet 4: The current proposed alignment is shown running thru a 20’ sewer easement which was abandoned per the Las Sendas final plat S06-205. Also the proposed sewer alignment is shown running thru the drainage areas along the north portion of this lot. Sheet 4: Call out all of the proposed sewer line segments for length/size and slope. The slopes that have been shown on Sheet 9 are below the required 0.44%. A variance will need to be obtained if you desire to go lower then the standard, please contact Mr. Francisco Duchicela @(520)740-6343 in order to start this process. Sheet 9: The private 4” BCS proposed for the QuikTrip should not be shown going thru the drainage basin. The line should be shown at least 10’ outside the basin perimeter. Sheet 9: Show how the Auto Parts Building and Car Wash are to be sewered. Sheet 9: Call out Ajo Way as an ADOT State Highway. This office will require a revised set of bluelines, and a response letter, addressing these comments. Additional comments may be made during the review of these documents. Pima County Code Title 13.20.030.A.2 requires that a wastewater review fee be paid for each submittal of the tentative or preliminary plat. The fee for the first submittal is $166 plus $50 per sheet. For the second submittal, the review fee is $50 per sheet. For all subsequent submittals, the review fee is $39 per sheet. The next submittal of this project will be the second (2nd) submittal. A check for the review fee of this submittal in the amount of $150.00 (made out to PIMA COUNTY TREASURER) must accompany the revised set of bluelines and response letter. If the number of sheets changes, please adjust the review fee accordingly. If you have any questions regarding the above-mentioned comments, please contact me. |
| 01/20/2010 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | OTHER AGENCIES | PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS | Approved | CASE: S09-081 QUIK TRIP STORE 1470: TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW COMMENT: NO OBJECTIONS OR ADVERSE COMMENTS Vehicle Trip Generation: Daily: 3,057 PM Peak: 354 Please call if you have questions or need additional information. ------------------------------------------- KoSok Chae, Ph.D. 177 N. Church Ave., Suite 405 Tucson, AZ 85701 520-792-1093 x487 [tel] 520-620-6981 [fax] www.PAGnet.org |
| 01/21/2010 | RONALD BROWN | ZONING HC | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 01/25/2010 | JASON GREEN | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | DATE: January 25, 2010 SUBJECT: QuikTrip #1470 Development Plan Core Review- Engineering Review TO: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Manager LOCATION: 3840 S Pandora Ave, T145S R13E Sec34/35 Ward 1 REVIEWERS: Jason Green, CFM ACTIVITY: S09-081 SUMMARY: Engineering Division of Planning and Development Services Department has received and reviewed the proposed Development Plan Package, Drainage Report No. 1 (DOWL Engineers, 23DEC09) and Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (DOWL Engineers, 23DEC09). Engineering Division does not recommend approval of the Development Plan Package at this time. This review falls under the draft policy for Development Plan Core Review, Development Standard 2-01. All comments reflect Development Plan, Grading Plan and SWPPP review. The following items need to be addressed: DRAINAGE STATEMENT: 1) DS Sec.10-02.2.3.1.2.E: Revise the Drainage Report to provide a discussion on the long term maintenance and use for the shared detention/retention basins. If private easements are utilized, protective covenants establishing the right of access, long-term maintenance and incorporation of future phases into this project are required. 2) Revise Section 1.3 of the Drainage Report to provide a discussion that all proposed basins (perimeter landscaping and screen walls) must be constructed under Phase I development per the Rezoning Condition #1 (C9-09-10). Refer to the Rezoning conditions for all applicable requirements for Phase I development. 3) Revise Section 1.3 of the Drainage Report to provide a discussion for the proposed bubbler box for canopy drainage. Provide a detail with specific construction requirements along with the location on Figure E-2 to verify on the development plan documents. 4) Revise Section 1.3 of the Drainage Report to clarify all proposed drainage improvements per the proposed development plan documents. Specifically the curb cut and riprap pad proposed at the north side of Basin 2. Clarify if this is an inlet curb cut from the PAAL or if this is supposed to be the Basin outlet. DEVELOPMENT PLAN: 5) Revise all notes and references on the development plan documents to correctly read "City of Tucson Planning and Development Services" where indicated by "City of Tucson Development Services." 6) DS Sec.2-01.2.5: Revise the development plan documents to include a 3-inch by 5-inch space in the lower right quadrant on all plan sheets (including the ALTA Survey) that shall be reserved for an approval stamp. 7) DS Sec.2-01.3.2.C: Revise the Title Block on all sheets to include a reference to all proposed "Blocks 1, 2 and 3." 8) DS Sec.2-01.3.3: The correct Development Plan Package number (S09-081) may be added to the lower right hand corner of the plan on all sheets where indicated by "#######." 9) DS Sec.2-01.3.3: Revise General Construction Note #55 to include any applicable DSMR #, date of approval along with any required conditions. 10) DS Sec.2-01.3.5: Revise the Sheet Index Section to include page reference numbers for all sheets included in the development plan documents, i.e. the "ADA Compliance Plan and the ALTA Survey" sheets. 11) DS Sec.2-01.3.7: Revise the General Construction Note Section to remove all notes that have been repeated. An example is Note #45 and #56. 12) DS Sec.2-01.3.7.A.6.b: Revise General Note #5 on the development plan document to include all overlay zones associated with this project. Specifically "LUC Sec.2.8.4 Gateway Corridor Zone." 13) DS Sec.2-01.3.7.A.7: Revise the development plan document to include the reference to the rezoning condition requirements and provide the "C9-09-10" case number in the lower right corner of each sheet. List the conditions of approval as a note. 14) DS Sec.2-01.3.8.B: All easements that are proposed to be abandoned are required to be vacated prior to final approval of the development plan documents unless permission from the easement holder(s) is provided. Specifically the 15-foot Water Easement. 15) DS Sec.2-01.3.8.C: Clarify all improvements that are to be constructed across the 3 Blocks and ownership/maintenance of said improvements. All PAALs, detention/retention basins, landscape areas, vehicular use areas, etc will be required to be in either a delineated common area individually labeled with a separate letter designation or a delineated easement clearly labeled with legal descriptions provided. 16) DS Sec.2-01.3.8.G: Since the project is to be phased, provide calculations, setbacks, etc., to indicate that each phase complies with all requirements as a separate entity. Show phase lines on the drawing. Show and label any temporary improvements that may be needed to make the site function for each phase as one entity. If such temporary improvements are off the site of the phase under consideration, a temporary easement or other legal documentation to assure legal use of the property is required. Note recording information. 17) DS Sec.2-01.3.9.H: Refer to comments from Jose Ortiz, PE City of Tucson Transportation and Engineering for all comments associated with the improvements along Ajo Way within the public right-of-way. Verify that all rezoning conditions for traffic issues are addressed on the second submittal. 18) DS Sec.2-01.3.9.H.6: Since the project is phased, the phase under consideration shall be designed so those later phases are assured legal access. If such access is provided through the phase under consideration access easements must be delineated and dedicated for such use. If private easements are utilized, protective covenants establishing the right of access and incorporation of future phases into this project are required. 19) DS Sec.2-01.3.9.L: Revise the development plan documents to dimension and label the required 1-foot no access easement along the full length of the west property line of Block 3 per rezoning condition #27. 20) DS Sec.2-01.3.9.M: Revise General Construction Note #4 to include the reference to the Geotechnical Report (Pattison Evanoff Engineering, LLC; 10JUL06) proposed for this project. Provide the date, job number, engineer who prepared the report, etc. 21) DS Sec.2-01.3.9.N: Per DS Sec.10-02.14.3.4 and the size of Basin 1 revise the development plan documents to label and dimension the required basin access ramp for the southern basin. Verify that the ramp meets the minimum width and slope requirement of 15-feet and 15%, respectively. 22) DS Sec.2-01.3.9.N.2: Verify that all proposed curb openings that are shown on Figure E-2 of the Drainage Report are shown on the development plan documents. Specifically the curb opening at the PAAL entrance west of the property line. Also verify that the curb opening along the north side of Basin 2 is addressed in the Drainage Report. 23) DS Sec.2-01.3.9.N.2: Revise Basin 1 to provide a minimum slope for the basin bottom to meet rezoning condition #22.b. Verify that the basin is sloped to drain to the inlet of the storm drain. 24) DS Sec.2-01.3.9.N.4: Revise Sheet 7 of the development plan documents to label both the inlet and outlet inverts for the proposed 12' PVC drain pipe. 25) DS Sec.2-01.3.9.N.4: Provide a basin cross section for Basin 2 to verify depth of cover over the proposed sewer line as shown on Sheet #4. 26) DS Sec.2-01.3.9.N.5: Revise the development plan documents to clearly delineate the drainage easement for all basins and storm drains. The easement around Basin 1 needs to be clarified and a new easement is required around Basin 2 and the storm drain pipe from Basin 1 to Basin 2. If private easements are utilized, protective covenants establishing the right of access and maintenance are required. 27) DS Sec.2-01.3.9.R: Refer to comments from Ron Brown, RA Structural Plans Examiner for all handicap accessibility comments that are associated with this project, if applicable. 28) DS Sec.2-01.3.9.R: Provide a pedestrian circulation path that connects the proposed building to Pandora Avenue. The pedestrian circulation path if adjacent to a PAAL is required to be 4-foot in width plus have an additional 1-foot setback from the PAAL. 29) DS Sec.2-01.3.9.T: It is recommended to revise the overall site layout to relocate the proposed refuse container for Block 3 so that it meets the minimum requirements for access and maneuverability. A 14'x40' clear approach is required for the refuse container, the proposed location does not allow for access or the maneuverability for the refuse vehicle. 30) DS Sec.11-01.4.1.C.3: Revise the development plan documents to clearly delineate the proposed grading limits for construction of Block 1 and all associated basins, landscape areas, vehicular use areas, right-of-way improvements, etc. Verify that the grading limits shown match the proposed SWPPP and exhibits. Provide a note to state; "Per rezoning condition #19 all areas that are not constructed under Phase I are required to have decomposed granite (DG) placed on all areas of disturbance." 31) DS Sec.11-01.9: Revise the development plan documents and associated details to verify the required minimum 2-foot setback from all property boundaries to the proposed limits of grading, basins, top of fill slopes, block wall and any associated erosion protection. Specifically for the south property line and adjacent top of slope for the proposed basin. 32) Prior approval from TDOT Permits and Codes will be required for all improvements within the public right-of-way. A right-of-way use permit application will be required prior to construction. Contact Thad Harvison, (520)-837-6592 or Thad.Harvison@tucsonaz.gov for all right-of-way requirements and permit applications. STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN: The SWPPP does not meet the minimum requirements of the AzPDES Construction General Permit (CGP). Revise the SWPPP according to these comments: 33) Part III.A.3 and VIII.J.2: Ensure the SWPPP is signed by a person meeting the certification requirements of Permit Part VIII.J. The owner of the property, since known, is required to sign the owner certification section prior to SWPPP approval. 34) Part III.C.3.b: Show areas of soil disturbance and areas that will not be disturbed. Verify that the grading limits shown match the grading limits on the proposed grading plan. Per Rezoning condition #19 all areas that are not constructed under Phase I is required to have decomposed granite (DG) placed on all areas of disturbance. Provide a note on the SWPPP and grading plan to state the condition of Rezoning. 35) Part III.D.3: Include a copy of the completed NOI form that will be submitted to ADEQ. The NOI must be signed by the owner prior to SWPPP approval. 36) Provide 3 copies of the revised SWPPP at resubmittal (1 for CDRC records, 1 for the Engineering Inspector and 1 for the job site) for stamp approval. GENERAL COMMENTS: Please provide a revised Development Plan Package, Drainage Report and SWPPP that addresses the comments provided above. Include a comprehensive response letter addressing in detail responses to all of the above comments. Further comments may be generated upon re-submittal of the Development Plan Package, Drainage Report, and SWPPP. For any questions or to schedule meetings call me at 837-4929. Jason Green, CFM Senior Engineer Associate Engineering Division Planning & Development Services Department |
| 01/27/2010 | JOHN BEALL | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Denied | PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES COMMENTS Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT S09-081 Quick Trip Store 1470 Tentative Plat (X) Tentative Plat () Development Plan (X) Landscape Plan () Revised Plan/Plat () Board of Adjustment () Other - CROSS REFERENCE: C9-09-10 Quick Trip - Ajo Way NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: Santa Cruz Area Plan GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: YES, Gateway COMMENTS DUE BY: 1/27/2010 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: () No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment () Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions () RCP Proposal Complies with Plan Policies (X) See Additional Comments Attached () No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: (X) Resubmittal Required: (X) Tentative Plat () Development Plan (X) Landscape Plan () Other REVIEWER: msp 791-4505 DATE: 1/25/2010 Department of Planning and Development Services S09-081 - Quick Trip Store 1470 January 25, 2010 Planning staff offers the following comments. 1. Please revise tentative plat, sheet 1, by adding to the general notes rezoning case C9-09-10. List all conditions of rezoning (per verbatim) as approved by Mayor and Council on January 5, 2010. 2. Please revise tentative plat to comply with rezoning C9-09-10, condition # 1.a., which requires Phase 1 to include all retention basins, perimeter landscaping and walls. The tentative plat sheets need to clearly identify the boundary of Phase 1, which must include within its boundary all the retention basins, perimeter landscape and walls in Block 1, Block 2, and Block3, as shown on the preliminary development plan dated October 22, 2009. 3. Please revise tentative plat sheets to comply with rezoning C9-09-10, condition # 8, which requires the tentative plat to indicate the height of all outdoor light poles and to indicate that all outdoor lighting to be directed downward, and shielded away from adjacent areas and public roadways. Please revise the appropriate sheet(s) which addressing site lighting. One example (but not limited to this example) of where these revisions can be made is on sheet 5, keynote 5 which deals with outdoor lighting. 4. Please revise tentative plat sheets to comply with that portion of rezoning C9-09-10, condition # 8 that addressed the gas island lighting. One example is to add a new keynote to sheet 5 to address the under canopy lighting for the gas island canopy. The rezoning condition states that ceiling gas island lighting will be in recessed light fixtures with light covers/lens flush with the finished ceiling design of the gas island canopy. 5. Please revise tentative plat to comply with rezoning C9-09-10, condition # 10 & 14. The required five-sided architectural elevations need to drawn to scale to determine proposed building height(s) (see rezoning condition for full detail) and must be in full size 24" X 36" sheet(s) as part of the tentative plat sheet count/submittal. The 24" X 36" sheet(s) shall be drawn in black & white but need to identify colors with paint codes that are to be provided in the color palette. In addition, provide in smaller print color versions [may use color pencils which best resemble the proposed color(s)] of the five-sided architectural building renderings/elevations. The color version to include a color palette that identifies each color by brand name and color code. The color versions can be submitted on a small print such as 11" X 17." 6. Please revise appropriate tentative plat sheet(s) to comply with rezoning C9-09-10, condition # 25, which requires the access point onto Pandora Avenue (located at southeast corner of site) to be signed with a "left only" exit from the site. 7. Please revise appropriate tentative plat sheet(s) to comply with C9-09-10, rezoning condition # 28, which requires clear and distinguished striped crosswalks across Phoebe Avenue and Pandora Avenue at there respective intersections with Ajo Way. 8. Just a reminder, keep in mind that rezoning C9-09-10, condition # 36 will need to be satisfied prior to obtaining City of Tucson building permits on this tentative plat. |
| 01/27/2010 | TERRY STEVENS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Terry Stevens Lead Planner PROJECT: S09-081 Quik Trip Store 1470 Tentative Plat / Development Package TRANSMITTAL: 01/27/2010 DUE DATE: 01/27/10 COMMENTS: 1. Section 4.1.7.1, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a tentative plat. If, at the end of that time, the tentative plat has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this tentative plat is 12/23/10. 2. DS 2-01.3.2.B The legal description located in the title block is required to indicate that this is a resubdivision of lots 1through 17 inclusive etc. 2-01.3.2.C Indicate the number of proposed lots in the title block. 3. DS 2-01.3.3 Provide in the lower right corner of all sheets the assigned case number S09-081. Provide in the same location the rezoning case number, C9-09-10, and provide on the plans all conditions of rezoning. Provide a separate letter clearly indicating how all conditions of rezoning have been met. 4. DS 2-01.3.7.A.4 List the subject to: section for the General merchandise Sales use listed in general note 4 under zoning and land use notes. (subject to: Sec. 3.5.9.2.A) 5. DS 2-01.3.7.A.9.d and DS 2-01.3.9.G If this project is to be phased, provide calculation, setbacks, etc., to indicate that each phase complies with all requirements as a separate entity. Show phase lines on the drawing. Show and label any temporary improvements that may be needed to make the site function as one entity. If such improvements are off site of the phase under consideration, a temporary or permanent easement or other legal documentation to assure legal use of the property is required. 6. DS 2-01.3.8.B Provide all proposed and existing easements. Easements for ingress/egress, cross parking, basins, etc. will be required to be shown on all lots. All new easements can be indicated as being provided by final plat. See engineering comments regarding easements. 7. DS 2-01.3.9.B Provide the square footage of each lot 8. DS 2-01.3.9.H.5.d Revise General Construction Note #55 to include any applicable DSMR #, date of approval along with any required conditions. If a DSMR is applied for and approved provide the case number near the lower right corner of each sheet. 9. DS 2-01.3.9.R Provide on the plan (phase 1) the pedestrian circulation path that will connect to the other phases as this project is considered as one development. The sidewalks at this time can be indicated as extending to the property lines on the east and west side of lot 2. Clearly indicate the width of the sidewalk at the top of the handicap ramp as being a minimum of 4' in width when the entrance door is in the open position. (possible solution is to move the handicap parking spaces to either side of the main entrance) 10. DS 2-01.3.9.U Indicate graphically, where possible, compliance with conditions of rezoning. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Terry Stevens, (520) 837-4961 TLS C:\planning\cdrc\tentativeplat\S09-081tp.doc |
| 01/28/2010 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1) Add the CDRC case number and any related case numbers to the landscape and native plant preservation plans. DS 2-07.2.1.B 2) Fences or walls constructed in a single continuous line shall extend into a street landscape border no more than the actual width of the fence or wall. Where a fence or wall incorporates offsets or similar design features, a screen may extend a maximum of three (3) feet into the street landscape border. Revise the proposed wall locations along Pandora and Phoebe Avenues. LUC 3.7.3.2.C 3) If a new development is using an existing screen on an adjacent property to meet screening requirements, a copy of the recorded covenant locating the existing screen(s) on adjacent property is required. DS 2-03.2.1.A.15 The above requirement means that required screening along the south property line must be provided on the developing property unless a legal joint use agreement (or covenant or easement) is provided indicating that the adjacent wall may be used to meet the screening requirement. The agreement is to include provisions for repair and maintenance. 4) Include an aerial photograph with the Native Plant Preservation Plan. DS 2-15.3.1.A.3 5) Include a Water Budget, including calculations with the Water Harvesting Plan per DS 10-03.4.1 6) Revise the landscape plan to show the extent of supplementary irrigation in each proposed planting area outside of Block II provided by water harvesting methods. Include these areas in the Water Harvesting Implementation Plans and Water Budget. DS 10-03.0 7) Keynote 1 on the Master Development Plan refers to COT/PC STD DTL 109, but detail 4 on sheet 12 is more appropriate due to the rezoning conditions. Revise as necessary. 8) Clarify on the plans that all existing temporary fencing will be removed or comply with LUC 3.7.3.7.D.2 which states "Nonwood fences, such as chain link, may not be used along a street frontage along a Gateway Route" 9) Include a calculation for canopy trees for the vehicular use area consistent with DS 2-07.2.2.A.2.C. Add the number of parking spaces provided and the number of qualifying trees. One tree is required for every four spaces. 10) Street landscape borders per LUC 3.7.2.4 are required Pandora and Phoebe Avenues. The proposed landscape will need to be upgraded to meet code requirements when the respective blocks are developed. A landscape easement is required until that is accomplished. LUC 4.1.8.4 |
| 01/29/2010 | PGEHLEN1 | TUCSON WATER NEW AREA DEVELOPMENT | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 01/29/2010 | PGEHLEN1 | COT NON-DSD | REAL ESTATE | Passed | |
| 01/29/2010 | JANE DUARTE | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Approved | |
| 02/02/2010 | JOSE ORTIZ | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Denied | February 2, 2010 ACTIVITY NUMBER: S09-081 PROJECT NAME: Quik Trip PROJECT ADDRESS: Ajo and Holiday PROJECT REVIEWER: Jose E. Ortiz PE, Traffic Engineer Resubmittal Required: Traffic Engineering does not recommend approval of the Tentative Plat; therefore a revised Tentative Plat is required for re-submittal. The following items must be revised or added to the plat. Include a response letter with the next submittal that states how all comments have been addressed. 1. Schematically illustrate all offsite improvements on the tentative plat. 2. A private improvement agreement will be necessary for any work performed within the Right-of-way. 3. Verify whether or not additional dedication of right of way is needed to accommodate all off-site improvements required by both TDOT and ADOT. 4. Provide the Traffic Impact Analysis for TDOT-Traffic review 5. Provide a separate exhibit (AutoTurn drawing) that illustrates the turning movements of refueling trucks at the main entrance to verify that the proposed lane configuration will receive the refueling truck with no conflicts with queuing vehicles in the driveway. Can be part of the submitted TIA. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-4259 x76730 or Jose.Ortiz@tucsonaz.gov |
| 02/03/2010 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES February 3, 2010 Richard Cordova DOWL HKM 166 West Alameda Ave Tucson, Arizona 85701 Subject: S09-081 Quik Trip Store 1470 Development Package Dear Richard: Your submittal of December 24, 2009 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and 11 sets of the DETAILED cover letter explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLACKLINES MUST BE FOLDED 11 Copies Revised Development Package (Assessor, ADOT, Addressing, Wastewater, Engineering, Zoning, Planning, Landscape, Traffic, ESD, PDSD) 3 Copies TIA (ADOT, Traffic, PDSD) 2 Copies Revised Drainage Report/Statement (Engineering, PDSD) 2 Copies Revised SWPPP (Engineering, PDSD) Should you have any questions, please call me at 837-4919. Sincerely, John Williams Planning Technician All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: (520) 624-0384 |
| 02/03/2010 | PGEHLEN1 | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Denied | Due Date Case Number Project Address January 27, 2010 S09-081 QuikTrip Store, 1470: Tentative Plat Review Comments: Decline based on the following items: 1.) The proposed container enclosure for refuse and recycle will need to be changed to a Double container enclosure or a second single container enclosure must be added as required on Development Standard No.6-01.0, Fig-3A or 3B 2.) The position of any container enclosures must be shown to be 3ft. clear from any adjacent curbs or structures. 3.) The development plans must clearly show and label the proposed location for any container enclosures. |
| 12/24/2009 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 12/28/2009 | DAVID MANN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approv-Cond | Fire sprinklers required |
| 12/29/2009 | ED ABRIGO | PIMA COUNTY | ASSESSOR | Denied | Office of the Pima County Assessor 115 N. Church Ave. Tucson, Arizona 85701 BILL STAPLES ASSESSOR TO: CDRC Office Subdivision Review City of Tucson (FAX# 791-5559) FROM: Sherry Hyde Senior Property Technician Pima County Assessor's Office DATE: 12/28/09 RE: Assessor's Review and Comments Regarding S09-081 QUIK TRIP STORE 1470: TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * X Plat meets Assessor's Office requirements. _______ Plat does not meet Assessor's Office requirements. COMMENTS: " THE TITLE BLOCK IN THE LOWER RIGHT HAND CORNER MUST HAVE THE NUMBER OF LOTS OR UNITS OR BLOCKS OR ANY COMBINATION OF THESE. IT MUST HAVE THE COMMON AREAS LISTED, IF THERE ARE ANY. IT MUST HAVE THE SECTION, TOWNSHIP AND RANGE. " GENERAL NOTES MUST HAVE THE NUMBER OF LOTS OR UNITS OR BLOCKS AND THE BASIS OF BEARING. " THE PERIMETER LINE MUST BE SOLID AND THE HEAVIEST LINEWEIGHT ON THE PLAT. THE LOT LINES AND COMMON AREA LINES MUST BE SOLID AND THE NEXT HEAVIEST. LINES FOR EROSION SETBACKS, FLOODPLAIN LINES ETC, SHOULD BE THE LIGHTEST LINEWEIGHT AND BE DASHED OR DOT-DASHED. " ALL HATCHING, STIPPLING, STRIPING ETC. MUST BE REMOVED IN THE FINAL PLAT, UNLESS ANOTHER AGENCY REQUIRES IT. THEN ALL LETTERING MUST HAVE THE HATCHING, ETC. CUT AWAY SO THEY ARE LEGIBLE. " OUR RECORDS SHOW OWNERSHIP TO BE TITLE SECURITY AGENCY OF AZ TR 1037 PER DOCKET 13086, PAGE 1811. NOTE: THE ASSESSOR'S CURRENT INVOLVEMENT IN PROCESSING ITS MANUAL MAPS TO DIGITAL FORMAT IS EXPEDITED GREATLY BY EXCHANGE OF DIGITAL DATA. IN THE COURSE OF RECORDING THIS SUBDIVISION YOUR ASSISTANCE IN PROVIDING THIS OFFICE WITH AN AUTOCAD COPY WOULD BE GREATLY APPRECIATED. THANK YOU FOR ANY DIGITAL DATA PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED. |