Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Plan Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RECORD OF SURVEY REVIEW
Plan Number - S09-067
Review Name: RECORD OF SURVEY REVIEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10/22/2009 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 10/22/2009 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | COT NON-DSD | REAL ESTATE | Passed | |
| 10/23/2009 | JIM EGAN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | |
| 10/23/2009 | ROGER HOWLETT | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Approved | PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES COMMENTS Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT S09-067 Meyer Avenue Record of Survey 10/23/09 ( ) Tentative Plat ( ) Development Plan ( ) Landscape Plan ( ) Revised Plan/Plat ( ) Board of Adjustment (XXXX) Other - Record or Survey CROSS REFERENCE: NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: Old Pueblo South Neighborhood Plan GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: COMMENTS DUE BY: 11/20/09 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: (XXXX) No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment ( ) Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions ( ) RCP Proposal Complies with Plan Policies ( ) See Additional Comments Attached ( ) No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: ( X ) No Resubmittal Required: ( ) Tentative Plat ( ) Development Plan ( ) Landscape Plan ( ) Other REVIEWER: Jbeall 791-4505 DATE: 10/23/09 |
| 10/28/2009 | JENNIFER STEPHENS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Denied | 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 AUDREY FARENGA ADDRESSING REVIEW PH #: 740-6800 FAX #: 623-5411 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: AUDREY FARENGA, ADDRESSING REVIEW SUBJECT: S09-067 MEYER AVENUE RECORD OF SURVEY/RECORD OF SURVEY REVIEW DATE: 10/28/09 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and the following matters must be resolved prior to our approval: Change E141325 to E141419 on Location Map. Add the subdivision name and book and page to the Title Block. Also, add “a portion of” before Lot 20. Spell out all street suffixes except on the Location Map. Delete all addresses. Add lots 1-5 on the Title Block. Correct the tax code on Notes 6. Recorded deeds with legal descriptions of each lot will need to be submitted in order to assign addresses. |
| 10/29/2009 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Planning and Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: Meyer Avenue S09-067 Record of Survey (1st Review) TRANSMITTAL DATE: October 29, 2009 DUE DATE: November 20, 2009 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. D.S. 2-03.11.0 permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a Record of Survey. If, at the end of that time, the development plan has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this record of survey is October 21, 2010. Remove all development criteria, i.e. buildings, fencing, walls from the record of survey. Provide a separate supplemental, residential plot plan, for Lot 2 that demonstrates how development criteria are met. D.S. 2-03.11.1.C There does not appear to be sidewalks along Ninth Avenue; this is a requirement of a record of survey. D.S. 2-03.11.7.D.3 2 Identify the railroads located along the east border of the section and at the northeast corner of the section on the location map. D.S. 2-03.11.7.E Place the words "BOOK_____PAGE______" in both the upper and lower right corners outside the margin line. The blanks will be completed by the Pima County Recorder's Office at the time of recordation. D.S. 2-03.11.7.F.1 The first line of the title block must read "RECORD OF SURVEY". D.S. 2-03.11.7.F.2 Provide the name of the survey following "RECORD OF SURVEY". D.S. 2-03.11.7.F.3 Provide the number of lots in the title block. D.S. 2-03.11.7.J Line weights will reflect the nature of the line, e.g., right-of-way lines will be more prominent than lot lines or easements, etc. D.S. 2-03.11.8.B.1 Place the Record of Survey case number S09-067 in the lower right hand corner of the plan. D.S. 2-03.11.8.B.3 General Note 4 calls out "THE NUMBER OF NEW LOTS IS 5", based on a lot split done in 2008 that split "LOT 1" the total number of new lots would be four (4). D.S. 2-03.11.8.B.4 General Note 5 appears to include the square footage for "LOT 1" which should not be a part of the record of survey. D.S. 2-03.11.9.A Revise "SURVEY CERTIFICATION STATEMENT" to read "CERTIFICATED OF SURVEY". D.S. 2-03.11.9.A Revise the "CERTIFICATED OF SURVEY" paragraph to match D.S. D.S. 2-03.11.9.A D.S. 2-03.11.11.A Show the existing utility easement, Book 3 page 70, as shown on the lot split S08-052, on the plan. D.S. 2-03.11.11.B The following information regarding the existing right-of-way (ROW) will be provided: recordation data, dimensioned width of paving, curb cuts and sidewalks. D.S. 2-03.11.11.C Provide a copy of the joint use sewer agreement that should be in place for the sewer being used by lots 1 & 2. D.S. 2-03.11.12.A There is a proposed "INGRESS, EGRESS & UTILITY EASEMENT" called out on the record of survey and a "UTILITY EASEMENT" provide that the legal descriptions seem to match, please clarify what type of easement is proposed. D.S. 2-03.11.12.A If the above proposed easement is for "INGRESS, EGRESS & UTILITY" then a one (1) foot no access easement is required at the west end of the proposed easement to prevent accessing more than to units from a single easement. D.S. 2-03.11.12.D As "LOT 1" was split off under S08-052 it is not part of the record of survey, correct lot numbering accordingly. D.S. 2-03.11.12.E Show locations of all proposed driveways on the plan. Provide a note on the plan stating "ALL FUTURE DEVELOPMENT FOR ANY LOT WILL REQUIRE HISTORIC PRESERVATON ZONE (HPZ) REVIEW. Provide a note on the plan stating "ALL FUTURE DEVELOPMENTFOR ANY LOT IS REQUIRED TO MEET ALL CITY OF TUCSON LAND USE CODE DEVELOPMENT REQUIREMENTS. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4956. C:\planning\cdrc\record of survey\S09-067ros.doc RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised Record of Survey and additional requested documents. |
| 11/04/2009 | PGEHLEN1 | TUCSON WATER NEW AREA DEVELOPMENT | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 11/10/2009 | LIZA CASTILLO | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Approved | SUBJECT: MEYER AVENUE RECORD OF SURVEY S09-067 Tucson Electric Power Company has reviewed and approves the record of survey submitted for review October 22, 2009. In order to apply for electric service, call the New Construction Department at (520) 770-2062. Submit a final set of plans including approved site, offsite and electrical load plans. Include a CD with the AutoCAD version of the plans. If easements are required, they will be secured by separate instrument. Please call me at (520) 917-8745, should you have any questions. Liza Castillo, Right of Way Agent II Tucson Electric Power Co. Unisource Energy Services offc-(520) 917-8745 fax-(520) 545-1416 lcastillo@tep.com |
| 11/10/2009 | GLENN HICKS | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Approved | DSD, Parks has no comments. Glenn Hicks Capital Planning and Development Parks & Recreation Dept., City of Tucson 900 S. Randolph Way Tucson, Az. 85716 (520) 791-4873 x 215 (520) 791-4008 (fax) ghicks1@ci.tucson.az.us |
| 11/10/2009 | PAUL MACHADO | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | To: Patricia Gehlen DATE: November 10, 2009 CDRC/Zoning Manager SUBJECT: 522 S. Meyer Ave., Record of Survey Record of Survey S09-067 (First Review) T14S, R13E, Section 13 RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Record of Survey. The Record of Survey (ROS) cannot be approved as submitted. Please address the following review comments prior to the next submittal. Record of Survey: 1. Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the FP. 2. It appears that the utilities to serve the lots are existing. If so, why is there an Assurance Approval block? Typically ROS do not require assurances to be posted. 3. Label the ingress/egress easement public or private. Easements shown on a ROS are generally dedicated by a separate instrument. With the easement being dedicated by separate instrument, then the easement will have to be recorded prior to approval of the ROS. 4. Show the previous parcel (117-14-346A & 117-14-346B) configurations by "ghosting" in the parcel lines. This will aide in the reading of the legal descriptions. 5. Show the overall distances for the west lot lines of lots 1, 2 and 3. The distance between the lot corners of lots 1, 2, 4 and 5 as well as overall distances on that common lot line. 6. The third brg. and dist. for lot 1is called out in the legal as S04D10'44"W, 77.41'. The distance does not measure on the ROS. 7. The first brg. and dist. for lot 3 is called out in the legal as S02D09'04"E, 35.18', however there are two brgs. with an angle point on that lot line. Please explain. The additional brg. on the west line of lot 3 affects the legal descriptions of lots 4 and 5. 8. Place the words "Book ____ Page ____" in both the upper and lower right corners outside the margin line. The blanks will be completed by the Pima County Recorder's Office at the time of recordation. 9. Show the COT activity no. (S09-067) on the ROS. 10. A legend which shows and describes all symbols used on the drawing will be placed on either the first sheet of the plat or the first sheet which contains all or part of the subdivision drawing. Also list all abbreviations used on the ROS and indicate whether all utilities are proposed or existing. 11. Corner lots may be designated with a star symbol indicating which street will be used for access. Use of this designation may limit design options for access. In instances where the City, for safety reasons, limits accessibility, a one (1) foot no access easement will be required. Which lots will use the I/E easement? 12. Show no-vehicular access easements where applicable. 13. Label all boundary lines as to exact nature. 14. The boundary survey and section breakdown must be shown, if performed. 15. All boundary monumentation must be labeled as "found" or "set." a. Fully describe and show all markings on found monuments. 16. Correct the SE section call-out on the Location Map. It should be E14-14-19. 17. Remove all general notes pertaining to the Airport Environs Zone (AEZ), the project is not located in the AEZ. 18. Remove general note 7, no lots have MS and R frontage. 19. Please submit a copy of the subdivision boundary closure calculations. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 837-4932 or Paul.Machado@tucsonaz.gov Paul P. Machado Senior Engineering Associate City of Tucson/Development Services Department 201 N. Stone Avenue P.O. Box 27210 Tucson, Arizona 85726-7210 (520) 837-4932 office (520) 879-8010 fax C:/522 S. Meyer Ave ROS |
| 11/16/2009 | RONALD BROWN | ZONING HC | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 11/17/2009 | ED ABRIGO | PIMA COUNTY | ASSESSOR | Approv-Cond | Office of the Pima County Assessor 115 N. Church Ave. Tucson, Arizona 85701 BILL STAPLES ASSESSOR TO: CDRC Office Subdivision Review City of Tucson (FAX# 791-5559) FROM: Joyce Hays, Section Supervisor Pima County Assessor’s Office Mapping Department DATE: 11/12/09 RE: Assessor’s Review and Comments Regarding S09-067 MEYER AVENUE RECORD OF SURVEY * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * X Plat meets Assessor’s Office requirements. _______ Plat does not meet Assessor’s Office requirements. COMMENTS: THE TITLE BLOCK IN THE LOWER RIGHT HAND CORNER NEEDS TO STATE THE NUMBER OF LOTS. GENERAL NOTES NEEDS TO STATE THE NUMBER OF MILES OF NEW ROAD, PUBLIC OR PRIVATE, EVEN IF THE NUMBER IS 0. THE NOTES AT THE TOP OF THE ROS #5 & #6 SHOULD STATE THE CURRENT TAX ID AS 117-14-346A & 346B & LOTS 2,3,4 & 5 IS RECORDED IN DOCKET 13298, PAGE 554 WITH CURRENT OWNERSHIP BEING THE WARREN W. MICHAELS & DENISE MICHAELS LIVING TRUST DATED MARCH 2, 2000. NOTE: THE ASSESSOR’S CURRENT INVOLVEMENT IN PROCESSING ITS MANUAL MAPS TO DIGITAL FORMAT IS EXPEDITED GREATLY BY EXCHANGE OF DIGITAL DATA. IN THE COURSE OF RECORDING THIS SUBDIVISION YOUR ASSISTANCE IN PROVIDING THIS OFFICE WITH AN AUTOCAD COPY WOULD BE GREATLY APPRECIATED. THANK YOU FOR ANY DIGITAL DATA PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED. |
| 11/18/2009 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 11/18/2009 | ANDY VERA | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | 1. ES acknowledges recept of record of survey. The following conditions must be included/clarified in DP: 2. No provisions are mentioned for solid waste disposal. The addition of 5 lots along with the existing two lots will require on site centralized solid waste(refuse and recycle) collection and storage. 3. An HOA will need to be established to assume responsibility for the common management and maintenance of the solid waste collection services and storage areas. If you have any questions you may contact Andy Vera at (520) 791-5543 ext 1212 or e-mail: Andy.Vera@tucsonaz.gov |
| 11/23/2009 | PGEHLEN1 | OTHER AGENCIES | PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS | Passed | CASE: S09-067, MEYER AVENUE RECORD OF SURVEY: RECORD OF SURVEY REVIEW COMMENT: NA Vehicle Trip Generation: Daily: N/A PM Peak: N/A Please call if you have questions or need additional information. ------------------------------------------- KoSok Chae, Ph.D. 177 N. Church Ave., Suite 405 Tucson, AZ 85701 520-792-1093 x487 [tel] 520-620-6981 [fax] www.PAGnet.org |
| 11/23/2009 | JOSE ORTIZ | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Approved | |
| 12/01/2009 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Denied | November 18, 2009 TO: Charles Corrales Steve Corrales Engineering Corp THRU: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Manager City of Tucson, Development Services Department FROM: Chandubhai C. Patel, P.E., Civil Eng. Manager Development Review Division (Wastewater) SUBJECT: Meyer Avenue Record of Survey, 1st Submittal S09-067 The drawing for the proposed Record of Survey has been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use. Add the project number S09-067, to the title block of the sheet. This number should be shown larger or bolder than any cross-reference numbers. 2. Show the name and phone number of the engineering firm who prepared this drawing. 3. Put the word LEGEND at top of the list of symbols and line types. In the Legend, specify whether the sewer line is existing or proposed. Identify Lot no. 20 on the drawing. Show the six-digit Pima County manhole number for all existing public manholes that are located on the sewer line in Meyer Avenue east of this development. Show the size and the Pima County plan number for the sewer line in Meyer Ave. Call out the sewer line between the two un-numbered lots as existing or public, and show its size. Is this line existing or proposed ? If the sewer line in comment no. 7 is proposed, a joint sewer use agreement is required. General Notes: The note no. 4 says the number of new lots is 5 whereas the title of the drawing shows survey of lot 20. Please clarify. Since this drawing lacks all the information asked for above, more comments may be forthcoming when we receive this information in the 2nd Submittal. We will require a revised drawing and a response letter addressing each comment. The next submittal of this project will be the 2nd submittal. A check for the review fee of this submittal in the amount of $50.00 made out to PIMA COUNTY TREASURER must accompany the revised set of bluelines and response letter. If you have any questions regarding the above mentioned comments, please contact me. Copy: Project |
| 12/01/2009 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | COT NON-DSD | TUCSON AIRPORT AUTHORITY | Approved | Thank you for the opportunity to review the subject Record of Survey review application. The Tucson Airport Authority does not oppose this request. Jordan D. Feld, AICP Director of Planning Tucson Airport Authority 7005 S. Plumer Ave. Tucson, AZ 85756 jfeld@tucsonairport.org www.tucsonairport.org (520) 573-5115 office (520) 573-8006 fax |
| 12/01/2009 | TOM MARTINEZ | OTHER AGENCIES | AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION | Approved | >>> Douglas Kratina <DKratina@azdot.gov> 11/23/2009 3:25 PM >>> Regional Traffic: No comment from Traffic Engineering on this submittal. The development will not affect any ADOT facility, proceed with development. Confidentiality and Nondisclosure Notice: This email transmission and any attachments are intended for use by the person(s)/entity(ies) named above and may contain confidential/privileged information. Any unauthorized use, disclosure or distribution is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by email, and delete or destroy all copies plus attachments. 2009 |
| 12/03/2009 | JOHN WILLIAMS | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES December 03, 2009 Steven Corrales Jr Steve Corrales Engineering Corporation 1008 W. St. Mary's Road Tucson, Arizona 85745 Subject: S09-067 Meyer Avenue Record of Survey Dear Steven: Your submittal of October 22, 2009, for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a DETAILED cover letter explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLUELINES MUST BE FOLDED 4 Copies Revised Record of Survey (Addressing, Engineering, Zoning, Assessor, ENV SVCS, Wastewater, PDSD) 2 Copies Joint Use Sewer Agreement (Zoning, PDSD) 2 Copies Subdivision Boundary Closure Calculations (Engineering, PDSD) Should you have any questions, please call me at 837-4919. Sincerely, John Williams Planning Technician All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.tucsonaz/dsd/ Via fax: (520) 622-2554 |
| 12/03/2009 | JOHN WILLIAMS | ZONING-RECORDATION | REVIEW | Needs Review |