Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Plan Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Plan Number - S09-026
Review Name: TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 04/09/2009 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 04/13/2009 | ED ABRIGO | PIMA COUNTY | ASSESSOR | Approv-Cond | Office of the Pima County Assessor 115 N. Church Ave. Tucson, Arizona 85701 BILL STAPLES ASSESSOR TO: CDRC Office Subdivision Review City of Tucson (FAX# 791-5559) FROM: Joyce Hays, Section Supervisor Pima County Assessor’s Office Mapping Department DATE: 04/13/09 RE: Assessor’s Review and Comments Regarding Tentative Plat Alvernon and Lee Offices, S09-026 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * x Plat meets Assessor’s Office requirements. _______ Plat does not meet Assessor’s Office requirements. COMMENTS: Please include the following in the Final Plat to ensure approval: The General Notes must include the number of miles of new public or private roads even if it is 0. The common areas must be clearly defined with the distances and bearings for every boundary line. All hatching, stippling, striping etc. must be removed in the final plat unless another agency requires it. Thank you for your submittal. Brian Sloan Pima County Assessor’s Office 740-4395 NOTE: THE ASSESSOR’S CURRENT INVOLVEMENT IN PROCESSING ITS MANUAL MAPS TO DIGITAL FORMAT IS EXPEDITED GREATLY BY EXCHANGE OF DIGITAL DATA. IN THE COURSE OF RECORDING THIS SUBDIVISION YOUR ASSISTANCE IN PROVIDING THIS OFFICE WITH AN AUTOCAD COPY WOULD BE GREATLY APPRECIATED. THANK YOU FOR ANY DIGITAL DATA PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED. |
| 04/13/2009 | DAVID MANN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | |
| 04/14/2009 | PGEHLEN1 | TUCSON WATER NEW AREA DEVELOPMENT | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 04/15/2009 | RONALD BROWN | ZONING HC SITE | REVIEW | Denied | 1. At the two connected marked crossings located at the South end of the site: a. The common ramp connection in the North Easterly island does not provide for the dectetable warning depth to be parallel with the direction of flow as required by ICC/ANSI 117.1, section 406.134. b. The marked crossings themselves are not parallell with the direction of travel and are at such a location and an angle as to create a hazard of parked parks backing into the crossings. c. Provide straight, perpendicular to the traffic flow, marked crossings with two separate sidewalk ramps and dectectable warnings to a common landing in the North East island. Provide a large scale detail. 2. Relocate the accessible parking to a more cental position along the lot accessible route of both Lots 1 and 3. 3. At the mid site accessible route marked crossing, the Southerly island connection has no relativity to Note 14. Revise detectable warning to have th3 2' deep dimenssion of the Detectable Warning parallel to the direction of flow. Provide a large scale detail. 4. Detail 1C4.0 and 2c4.2: Detectable Warnings not required in this situation unless parking aisle is part of a marked crossing. 5. Detail 7C4.0: Parking sign as regulated by "Park Wise", contact Dan Angel, 429-3318. Mounting height to be 84" above finish grade not 60". 6. Detail 3C4.2: Curb ramp to compy with section 406, all flared sides to max slope of 1:10. END OF REVIEW |
| 04/17/2009 | JOHN BEALL | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Denied | DEPARTMENT OF URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN COMMENTS Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: S09-026 CASE NAME: Alvernon and Lee Offices, TP/DP DATE SENT: 4/17/09 Items reviewed: Tentative Plat/Development Plan and Landscape Plan (TP/DP) Cross Reference Cases: C9-08-15 Area or Neighborhood Plan: Grant-Alvernon Area Plan Gateway or Scenic Route: N/A Due Date: April 24, 2009 Staff has reviewed the plans, and finds that the TP/DP is not approved. Please address the following comments. 1) Per rezoning condition #15, a right-turn only sign is to be provided at the exit onto Lee Street, to direct traffic towards Alvernon and away from the neighborhood interior. Please show the sign on the plans. 2) Per rezoning condition #16, please provide porous paving in the pedestrian area northeast of building 1, north of the loading zone, for the short section adjacent to the two 5-gallon Nolina texanas. The purpose is to provide more water and aeration for the plant roots, and to provide a cooler pedestrian micro-climate. 3) Please add the following general notes to the TP/DP: All buildings will be designed to: a. Have "four-sided" architecture; b. Have varied roof lines; c. Screen mechanical equipment from view from surrounding property and streets, and d. Incorporate a color scheme that is consistent with the Sonoran Desert environment and complements the surrounding development. Colored elevations demonstrating compliance with conditions 9, 10, 11, and 13 of rezoning case C9-08-15 will be submitted during building permit review for lot 1, as lot 1 is the only lot subject to the rezoning conditions. 4) According to the information submitted, the applicant will be requesting use of the Design Development Option (DDO) to allow metal fencing along the eastern property line. Use of decorative metal fencing is consistent with the intent of the rezoning. Reviewed by: Joanne Hershenhorn, 837-6965 4/17/09 S:\Case_Review\CDRC\S09-026_Alvernon_Lee_Offices.doc |
| 04/21/2009 | PAUL MACHADO | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | To: Patricia Gehlen DATE: April 23, 2009 CDRC/Zoning Manager SUBJECT: Alvernon & Lee Offices, 1602 N. Alvernon Way Subdivision Plat S09-026 (First Review) T14S, R14E, Section 03 RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Subdivision Plat and Drainage Report. The Subdivision Plat (SP) and Drainage Report (DR) cannot be approved as submitted. Please address the following review comments prior to the next submittal. Subdivision Plat: 1. Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the DP. 2. As per the Federal ADA requirements, all wheel chair ramps shall have the truncated domes instead of the standard grooves that are shown on COT SD 207. Aside from the Truncated Domes, all wheel chair ramps shall be constructed in accordance with COT SD 207. 3. Label existing and future sight visibility triangles per D.S. 2-02.2.1.10. 4. Fully-dimensioned loading space(s) and maneuvering area(s) per D.S. 2-02.2.1.14. 5. Label Common area "B" with the square footage, at the SW corner of the project on both sheets C1.0 and C2.0. 6. Please show dimensioned right-of-way, including any applicable Major Streets and Routes (MS&R) Plan right-of-way per D.S. 2-02.2.1.19. The project (Lee and Alvernon) is subject to and affected by intersection widening per the MS and R. Also per rezoning condition no. 23. 7. Label Pima Street as a collector street per the M.S. & R. 8. All easement of record must be graphically shown on the plan together with recording docket and page per D.S. 2-02.2.1.20. 9. Dimension from street monument lines to existing and proposed curbs, sidewalks, driveways, and utility lines per D.S. 2-02.2.1.21. 10. Edit general note 27 by omitting the "or" from "and/or" from the note. 11. Add the basin(s) maintenance responsibility note per S.M.D.D.F.M. 2.3.1.6 C 1 and 2 to the general notes. 12. Add note that this parcel is affected by the City of Tucson flood hazard area. 13. A flood plain use permit is required for the approval of the development package. 14. Show refuse container location, size, and access thereto fully dimensioned per D.S. 2-02.2.1.32 and D.S. 6-01.0. Refuse enclosure called out on key note no. 15 and 16: The enclosures shown does not allow for the maximum of 50' back up distance. Perhaps using a North/South alignment for (key note 15) would satisfy the back up requirement. 15. Provide pedestrian access to the refuse enclosures from each building that it serves. 16. Placement of fill in excess of 2' above existing grade at any location in the outer 100' of the developing site is not allowed and/or shall meet the requirements per D.S. 11-01. Add existing spot elevations for bldg. 2 to determine if the FFE, 1' above the base flood elevation, will exceed 2' of fill. 17. A permit or a private improvement agreement will be necessary for any work performed within the Right-of-way. Contact Permits and Codes at (520) 791-5100 for permit information. 18. Please show a typical cross section of the P.A.A.L. or call out the percentage of slopes. Call out the GB at the D/W, if applicable. Show a max. 2% slope transverse and longitudinal for handicap parking bays. 19. Please show the proposed roof drainage patterns, 100% of the 10-year flow must be conveyed under the sidewalks including any other site drainage as well. Please provide supporting calculations to demonstrate compliance with D.S. 3-01.4.4. If the location(s) of the roof scuppers have not yet been decided, a general note indicating sidewalk scuppers will be used when the roof scuppers locations have been designed and located will suffice. Drainage Report: 1. Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the DR. 2. This review was performed for Tentative Plat purposes only. 3. Adhere to rezoning condition 21.D, rectangular basins shall be avoided. 4. It appears that the major retention basin is located upstream from the largest drainage area. Explain how the requirement for the 5-year threshold is accomplished. 5. Obtain permission and provide documentation from TDOT (City of Tucson) to tap into the existing catch basin on Lee Street. 6. PVC is not allowed in the public right-of-way. Any pipe proposed in the public right-of-way must be reinforced concrete. 7. All stormwater shall be directed to a water harvesting and/or basin prior to the stormwater being discharged onto adjacent streets. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 837-4932 or Paul.Machado@tucsonaz.gov Paul P. Machado Senior Engineering Associate City of Tucson/Development Services Department 201 N. Stone Avenue P.O. Box 27210 Tucson, Arizona 85726-7210 (520) 837-4932 office (520) 879-8010 fax C:/1602 N. Alvernon Way_CDRC_DEV |
| 04/21/2009 | TERRY STEVENS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Terry Stevens Lead Planner PROJECT: S09-026 Alvernon and Lee Offices Tentative Plat TRANSMITTAL: 04/23/2009 DUE DATE: 04/24/09 COMMENTS: 1. Section 5.3.8.2, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a development plan. If, at the end of that time, the development plan has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this development plan is 04/09/10. 2. DS 2-01.3.7.4 Remove from general note #1 the subject to Sec. 6.3.5.2. After the Medical Services-Outpatient "29" in both places add the subject to: Sec. 3.5.4.8.B. 3. DS 2-01.3.7.A.6 General note #28 indicates using a DDO process to change the rezoning condition #19, a change to a rezoning condition cannot be done through a DDO process. Contact Michael Wyniken (791-4505) for the correct process for changing a rezoning condition. 4. DS 2-01.3.7.9.b Provide the allowed and provided Floor Area Ratio (FAR) calculations for both phase 1 and phase 2. 5. DS 2-01.3.8.B Provide the last approved site plan for the two parcels (122-13-211B and 122-13-2130) located north of building #3. The furthest north of the two parcels (122-13-2130) indicates an easement for the trash enclosure which appears is going to be eliminated. Clarify how trash collection will be provided for this site. Clarify the ingress/egress easement over this property located within the parking spaces. If easements are to be abandoned provide docket and page recording information on the plan. Parcel (122-13-211B),with the parking lot reconfiguration, must meet all requirements of the LUC and Development Standards. Depending on the last approved site plan additional comments may be forth coming. For example: pedestrian circulation, loading zone, wheel stops, handicap ramps, etc. Provide on the plan the use of this structure, the required and provided number of parking spaces, loading zone provided and required, FAR calculations, per the aerial photos the appears to be additional buildings located along the east property line provide documentation of permits for these structures. 6. DS 2-01.3.9.F The indicated CB-1 zoning of the property adjacent to this project at the north east corner is incorrect. The correct zoning is C-1. Revise. Clearly indicate the zoning boundary between this zone and the R-2 zoning to the south. 7. DS 2-01.3.9.G Since this project is to be phased, provide calculations, setbacks, etc., to indicate that each phase complies with all requirements as a separate entity. Show phase lines on the drawing. Show and label any temporary improvements that may be needed to make the site function for each phase as one entity (temporary barriers, curbing, etc. to prevent vehicles from driving onto unimproved portions of the site). 8. DS 2-01.3.9.H.5 Parking area access lanes (PAALs), shall be designed in accordance with Sec. 3.3.0 of the LUC and Development Standard 3-05.0. DS 3-05.2.2.B.2 A minimum distance of one (1) foot must be maintained between any open structure, such as a carport, and a PAAL. A PAAL width of 25' is then required at the indicated carports (covered parking). DS 3-05.2.2.D A back-up spur will be provided at the end of a row of parking if no ingress or egress is provided at that end. The spur will be a minimum of three (3) feet in depth, will have a three (3) foot radii, and will have a wheel barrier to prevent encroachment onto any unsurfaced areas. A minimum distance of three (3) feet will be provided between the back of spur and any wall, screen, property line or other obstruction over six (6) inches in height. Provide dimensions for the backup spurs located north of building #5, south of building #4 and south of building #2 including the 3' radius and 3' clearance behind the backup spur. 9. DS 2-01.3.9.H.5.a FYI: The mixed use reduction for the parking can be used for the entire site. Provide wheel stops at all parking spaces to limit the overhang of vehicles from limiting the width of the sidewalks to less than 4' or provide a 6'-6" wide sidewalk in front of all parking spaces. Wheel stops are also required to prevent damaging walls (screen walls) or overhanging of vehicles into a landscape area. Clearly indicate the location of all wheel stops on the drawing. 10. DS 2-01.3.9.H.5.c Per LUC Sec. 3.4.4.1.B.2 On a project containing more than one (1) building, loading spaces shall be provided for each building, based on the number of spaces required for the uses within each building. Each loading zone must be located within close proximity to the building which it severs. The number of required loading zones in the calculations is incorrect. Revise. See LUC Sec. 3.4.5 for possible use of a 10x18 loading zone for some of the buildings. Clearly indicate maneuverability in and out of all loading zones. See engineering comments. 11. DS 2-01.3.9.H.5.d The bicycle parking spaces located at the southwest corner of building #2 appear to be located in the 3' clearance are for the backup spur. Relocate. 12. DS 2-01.3.9.J Please draw, label, and dimension the future taper on the plan. The future curb and sidewalk based on the future intersection widening must be drawn, labeled and dimensioned. Please refer to the Major Streets and Routes Plan. Per DS 2-05.2.3.C & DS 2-05.2.4.F It appears that the property is within the intersection widening section, more specific the taper section. Please verify with City Engineering if additional widening will required for this intersection. 13. DS 2-01.3.9.L If applicable, all proposed easements (utility, sewer, drainage, access, etc.) are to be dimensioned and labeled as to their purposes and whether they will be public or private. 14. DS 2-01.3.9.O and .Q Provide the height of the proposed covered parking structures. It appears that the structure will not meet the required setback of 1 ½ times the height of the structure. Clarify. 15. DS 2-01.3.9.R Per DS 2-08.3.1 a pedestrian circulation path must connect to all areas of public access within the development. Including trash enclosures. A 4' sidewalk is required between a building and any parking spaces accessed by a PAAL. Missing at the north side of building #3. The intersecting cross walks indicated at the handicap ramp near the southwest corner of building #2 will be required to be redesigned to place the crosswalks as close as possible to 90 degrees to the PAAL. Another handicap ramp and relocating the indicated ramp would solve the problem of the pedestrian path being located within the PAAL. 16. DS 2-01.3.9.W Indicate the locations and types of proposed signs (wall, freestanding, pedestal) to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements and that minimal locational requirements can be met. Also indicate if there are existing billboards on site. Billboards will be required to meet all LUC requirements as stated in LUC Sec. 3.5.4.26. If none exists please state so. 17. Based on responses to above comments and changes to these plans additional comments may be forth coming. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Terry Stevens, (520) 837-4961 TLS C:\planning\cdrc\tentativeplat\S09-026tp.doc Grading notes for permits plus. With TENTATIVE PLAT PLAN 04/23/2009 Development Services Department Zoning Review Section Terry Stevens Lead Planner Comments: 1. The grading plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until it has been approved by the Engineering, and Landscape Review Sections and until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed. 2. Zoning could not verify that the grading plan was in compliance with the approved tentative plat. Please submit one copy of the CDRC approved and stamped tentative plat, landscape, and NPPO plans with the next grading plan submittal. 3. Zoning will re-review the grading plan on the next submittal to insure compliance with the CDRC approved and stamped tentative plat. Additional comments may be forthcoming. |
| 04/21/2009 | PAUL MACHADO | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | To: Presidio Engineering Inc. DATE: April 23, 2009 4582 N. 1st Avenue Tucson, Arizona 85718 SUBJECT: Alvernon & Lee Offices, 1602 N. Alvernon Way Grading Plan T09BU00522 (First Review) T14S, R14E, Section 03 RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Grading Plan, Drainage Report and SWPPP The Grading Plan (GP), Drainage Report (DR) and Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan cannot be approved as submitted. Please address the following review comments prior to the next submittal. Grading Plan: 1. Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the GP. 2. Add note: "Depress all landscaped areas a maximum of 6" for water harvesting" 3. Include the geotechnical report with the re-submittal. 4. Add the following notes to the grading plan notes: " "The approved Grading Plan is the only acceptable construction plan onsite. The Contractor may not use any other plans, such as the approved Tentative Plat and/or Development Plan, for construction purposes. The Contractor may ask the Development Services Inspector to consult with the other approved plans for additional information or details that might not be included on the approved grading plan but needed for completion of work." " "The contractor shall remove the fine materials from the bottom of the detention/retention basin and scarify the basin bottom once the construction activities are completed in order to remove any fine material build up caused by construction and to restore soil percolation." " "Any engineering work to be done below grade (i.e. toe-downs, cutoff walls, drainage pipes/structures, etc.) shall not be back filled until Development Services Inspector inspects the work and approves it." 5. Add the basin(s) maintenance responsibility note per S.M.D.D.F.M. 2.3.1.6 C 1 and 2 to the GP. 6. Show refuse container location, size, and access thereto fully dimensioned per D.S. 2-02.2.1.32 and D.S. 6-01.0. Refuse enclosure called out on key note no. 15 and 16: The enclosures shown does not allow for the maximum of 50' back up distance. Perhaps using a North/South alignment for (key note 15) would satisfy the back up requirement. Dimension the 10'x10' clear areas on both enclosures on detail 1 sheet C4.1. 7. Add note that this parcel is affected by the City of Tucson flood hazard area. 8. Add note "A floodplain use permit and finished floor elevation certificates are required for lots 1 and 2. 9. A flood plain use permit for grading is required for the approval of the development package. 10. List administrative address/site address on plans. 11. Provide a Location Map (3" = 1 mile) 12. Please show the proposed roof drainage patterns, 100% of the 10-year flow must be conveyed under the sidewalks including any other site drainage as well. Please provide supporting calculations to demonstrate compliance with D.S. 3-01.4.4. If the location(s) of the roof scuppers have not yet been decided, a general note indicating sidewalk scuppers will be used when the roof scuppers locations have been designed and located will suffice. 13. Curb and Gutter elevation include drainage flow with percent slope. 14. A permit or a private improvement agreement might be necessary for any work performed within the Right-of-way. Contact Permits and Codes at (520) 791-5100 for permit information. 15. Delineate 100-year W.S.E.L., Floodplain and erosion hazard setback. 16. Call out all slopes and stabilization material (concrete, riprap, gabbions or vegetation). 17. Please show a typical cross section of the P.A.A.L. or call out the percentage of slopes. Call out the GB at the D/W, if applicable. Show a max. 2% slope transverse and longitudinal for handicap parking bays. 18. Slopes of 3H: 1V require hand placed riprap. 19. Slopes of 2H: 1V or greater require grouted riprap. 20. Cut or fill slopes require a 2' minimum setback from property line. 21. Placement of fill in excess of 2' above existing grade at any location in the outer 100' of the developing site is not allowed and/or shall meet the requirements per D.S. 11-01. Add existing spot elevations for bldg. 2 to determine if the FFE, 1' above the base flood elevation, will exceed 2' of fill. 22. Drainage patterns with percent slopes (Show patterns within the first 100 feet from the property line). 23. Flow arrows, grades and flow rates within and adjacent to site to show drainage scheme. 24. Complete the data on basin details 3 and 4. 25. Call out all inverts for pipes and junctures. 26. Detention/Retention: " Match Drainage report. " Cross-sections and dimension. " Dimension basin and provide spot elevations. " Security barriers are required if ponding depth exceeds 2 feet, if slopes are greater than 4:1 and/or if pedestrian access is adjacent to basin. " Water surface elevations. " Peak discharge at basin's outlet. 27. Show details of all surface and subsurface drainage devices. Provide/call-out 2' depressed curbs for water harvesting at all landscaped areas/islands etc. 28. It appears that the drainage will at the SW entrance on Alvernon way. A scupper may be warranted on the other side of the sheet. Drainage report: 1. Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the DR. 2. Adhere to rezoning condition 21.D, rectangular basins shall be avoided. 3. It appears that the major retention basin is located upstream from the largest drainage area. Explain how the requirement for the 5-year threshold is accomplished in this area. 4. Obtain permission and provide documentation from TDOT (City of Tucson) to tap into the existing catch basin on Lee Street. 5. Show details of all drainage structures in the DR with dimensions. 6. Percolation test results are required for grading final inspection. 7. PVC is not allowed in the public right-of-way. Any pipe proposed in the public right-of-way must be reinforced concrete. 8. All stormwater shall be directed to a water harvesting and/or basin prior to the stormwater being discharged onto adjacent streets. 9. Add the basin(s) maintenance responsibility note per S.M.D.D.F.M. 2.3.1.6 C 1 and 2 to the DR. STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN: 1. Edit cover sheet to name correct project. This project is not the Dollar Tree Store. Revise as required. 2. Edit "Project Name and Location" on sheet 1. The project is not located on Nexus Rd. and Valencia Rd. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: 1. Indicate the percentage of the site that is impervious (e.g., pave, roofed , etc.) before and after construction. Part III.C.2.d. 2. Describe the soil (e.g., sand, clay, etc.) at the site and its potential for erosion (Suggestion: reference the soil survey covering the project site prepared by the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resource Conservation Service for soil information http://soils.usda.gov/survey/). Part III.C.2.e. BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES (BMPs): 3. If using seed to revegetate, provide the mixture and application specifications. (These may be obtained from product provider. Part IV.B.1.b. POST-CONSTRUCTION CONTROLS: 4. Identify post-construction stormwater BMP's (e.g., porous pavement, open space preservation, etc.) that will be installed as part of this project. NOTE: Temporary BMP's (e.g., straw waddles, etc.) must be removed prior to submitting your Notice of Termination (NOT). Part IV.F.1. ADMINISTRATIVE: 5. Ensure the SWPPP is signed be a person meeting the certification requirements of Permit Part VIII.J. Part III.A.3, Part VIII.J.2. 6. Include a copy of the authorization certificate received from ADEQ. Part III.D.3. 7. Provide adequate sediment basins. (Part IV.D.5.a.). 8. Describe post-construction storm water management measures that will be installed during the construction process to control pollutants in stormwater discharges after construction operations have been completed. Structural measures shall be placed on upland soils to the degree attainable. Such measures must be designed and installed consistent with applicable local or state stormwater management requirements. (Part IV.D.6). Inspections 9. Add a note stating that the operator(s) shall report to ADEQ any noncompliance (including spills) which may endanger human health or the environment. The operator shall orally notify the office listed below within 24 hours: Arizona Department of Environmental Quality 1110 W. Washington, 5th floor (5515B-1) Phoenix, AZ 85007 Office: 602-771-4466; Fax 602-771-4505 Signature Requirements 10. Include a certification and signature for each operator in accordance with Part VII.K. (Part IV.J.1). 11. All NOIs must be signed and certified as follows: a) For a corporation: By a responsible corporate officer. For the purpose of this Part, a responsible corporate officer means: i) A president, secretary, treasurer, or vice-president of the corporation in charge of a principal business function, or any other person who performs similar policy or decision-making functions for the corporation; or ii) The manager of one or more manufacturing, production, or operating facilities, provided, the manager is authorized to make management decisions which govern the operation of the regulated facility including having the explicit or implicit duty of making major capital investment recommendations, and initiating and directing other comprehensive measures to assure long term environmental compliance with environmental laws and regulations; the manager can ensure that the necessary systems are established or actions taken to gather complete and accurate information for permit application requirements; and where authority to sign documents has been assigned or delegated to the manager in accordance with corporate procedures. b) For a partnership or sole proprietorship: By a general partner or the proprietor, respectively; or c) For a municipality, state, federal, or other public agency: By either a principal executive officer or ranking elected official. For purposes of this section, a principal executive officer of a Federal agency is the chief executive officer having responsibility for the overall operations of a principal geographic unit of the agency (e.g. Regional Administrators of EPA). 12. Reports and Other Information: All NOTs, SWPPPs, reports, certifications, or information required by this general permit and other information requested by the ADEQ or authorized representative of the ADEQ shall be signed by a person described in Part VI.K.1 or by a duly authorized representative of that person. 13. Certification. Any person signing a documents under the terms of this permit shall make the following certification: I certify under penalty of law, that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gathered and evaluated the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system, or those persons directly responsible for gathering information, the information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of fine and imprisonment for knowing violations. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 837-4932 or Paul.Machado@tucsonaz.gov Paul P. Machado Senior Engineering Associate City of Tucson/Development Services Department 201 N. Stone Avenue P.O. Box 27210 Tucson, Arizona 85726-7210 (520) 837-4932 office (520) 879-8010 fax C:/1602 N. Alvernon Way_GRAD |
| 04/22/2009 | ANDY STEUART | COT NON-DSD | REAL ESTATE | Denied | Comment provided 4/22/09 by Andy Steuart, Property Agent, City Manager's Office/Real Estate Program, (520) 837-6715 -Request a "cross-access easement" be provided within C.A. "A" for APN 122-13-211B (Grassmack LLC) |
| 04/23/2009 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | The Landscape Section requests the following actions: 1) Revise the tree planters proposed in the parking areas such that the planter barrier does not interfere with use of the parking space. The current design may cause longer vehicles to extend into the p.a.a.l. LUC 3.3.7.2 2) Revise the tentative plant and the landscape plan to indicate the alignment and termination points for the proposed screen walls adjacent to residentially zoned properties. DS 2-01.3.9.X 3) If a DDO is processed the site please note the case number and the pertinent details and conditions on the plans. DS 2-01.3.3 4) Revise the street landscape border calculations to reflect the actual width, not the minimum width of the street landscape borders. Per DS 2-06.3.4.C.2 the landscape border width needs to be determined for the purposes of calculating the fifty (50) percent vegetative coverage requirement, Sec. 3.7.2.4 of the LUC. The width is that area between the required screen and the property line, unless there is encroachment into the right-of-way as per Sec. 2-06.3.4.C.1. 5) Revise the tentative plat to indicate the tree planter grates identified on the landscape plan. DS 2-06.3.9.R 6) Revise the plans as necessary to identify the MS&R setbacks. The plan designations differ from those indicated on the plans. DS 2-01.3.9.R 7) Landscaping or portions of landscape borders proposed in right-of-way or MS&R areas must be approved by the City Engineer or designee and comply with the City Engineer's requirements on construction, irrigation, location, and plant type. Provide verification, in writing, of any approvals obtained. Contact Gary Wittwer, DOT Landscape Architect for specific requirements. DS 2-06.2.2.M 8) The loading and refuse storage areas in the southern portion site are required to be screened with a 6' high masonry wall per LUC Table 3.7.2-I. from the adjacent residentially zoned property to the east. 9) Vegetation or structures higher than thirty (30) inches must be located outside of the sight visibility triangles (SVT's). Show the SVT's on the landscape plans and revise the plantings to comply. DS 3-01.5.1.A 10) Screening and a barrier at the perimeter of the vehicular use area would be required in addition to the alternate bufferyard proposed on sheet C.4.2. Refer to DS 2-05.2.4.C. 11) Provide information on how the site complies with the condition of rezoning related to provision of reflective and pervious alternate paving materials on the plans. 12) Revise the screen wall location along Pima Street in accordance with LUC 3.7.3.2.C. It allows only three foot maximum encroachment of the wall into the street landscape border. GRADING PLAN 12) Revise the grading plan as necessary to correspond with all pertinent requested changes to the other plans. |
| 04/23/2009 | ANDY VERA | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Denied | 1. The current placement of dumpsters as shown does not allow adequate circulation or maneuverability to and from enclosure areas. DS 6-01.3.1.A & DS 6-01.4.H 2. Joint use dumpster enclosure appears to conflict with minimum required 14 ft x 40 ft clear approach with parking spaces. DS 6-01.4.1.C Clarify joint users, provide 25 ft curb return radius so not jumping curb/sidewalk when entering, and turnaround for collection vehicle. 3. Contact Andy Vera at Environmental Services to discuss enclosure placement options to work for development. 4. Provide a general note designating " One single Property Owner, Association, or Management will be responsible for the management and maintenance of all solid waste enclosure areas and services for all Lots and/or Buildings within development." 5. Dumpster enclosure detail - call out post at face of CMU wall to be separate from wall for mounting the gates to. Please provide corrections on resubmittal. If you have any questions you may contact Andy Vera at (520) 791-5543 ext 1212 or e-mail: Andy.Vera@tucsonaz.gov |
| 04/23/2009 | JOSE ORTIZ | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Denied | April 23, 2009 ACTIVITY NUMBER: S09-026 PROJECT NAME: Alvernon and Pima Offices PROJECT ADDRESS: Alvernon/Pima PROJECT REVIEWER: Jose E. Ortiz PE, Traffic Engineer Resubmittal Required: Traffic Engineering does not recommend approval of the Tentative Plat; therefore a revised Tentative Plat is required for re-submittal. The following items must be revised or added to the tentative plat. 1. Include a response letter with the next submittal that states how all comments have been addressed. 2. Illustrate on the plans the existing and future right of way as depicted on the Major Sheets and Routes Map. 3. This plan does not seem to take into account the future intersection widening and right of way for Alvernon & Pima in accordance with the Major Streets and Routes plan. 4. Show and label both existing and future SVTs (DS 2-03.2.4.M). 5. If applicable (per future TIA), verify that adequate right of way is available for a right turn lane. 6. A permit or a private improvement agreement will be necessary for any work performed within the Right-of-way. Contact Permits and Codes at (520) 791-5100 for permit information. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-4259 x76730 or Jose.Ortiz@tucsonaz.gov |
| 04/24/2009 | TOM MARTINEZ | OTHER AGENCIES | AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION | Denied | >>> Douglas Kratina <DKratina@azdot.gov> 04/24/2009 8:34 AM >>> Regional Traffic Engineering. * No comments from Traffic Engineering on this submittal. The development will not affect any ADOT facility. * Traffic will forward tentative plat to Development Engineer for separate comments. Thank you. ________________________________ Confidentiality and Nondisclosure Notice: This email transmission and any attachments are intended for use by the person(s)/entity(ies) named above and may contain confidential/privileged information. Any unauthorized use, disclosure or distribution is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by email, and delete or destroy all copies plus attachments. 2009 |
| 04/24/2009 | GLENN HICKS | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Approved | DATE: April 16, 2009 TO: DSD_CDRC@ tucsonaz.gov FROM: Glenn Hicks Parks and Recreation 791-4873 ext. 215 Glenn.Hicks@tucsonaz.gov SUBJECT: S09-026 Alvernon and Lee Offices: Tentative Plat Review(4/10/09) No comments. |
| 04/24/2009 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Approved | April 24, 2009 To: JOHN WOOD PRESIDIO ENGINEERING, INC Thru: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Manager City of Tucson Development Services Department ____________________________________________ From: Tom Porter, Sr. CEA (520-740-6719), representing the Pima County Departments of Regional Wastewater Reclamation Department and Environment Quality Subject: ALVERNON & LEE OFFICES, LOTS 1-5 & COMMON AREAS "A AND B" Tent. Plat - 1st Submittal S09-026 The proposed sewer collection lines for the above-referenced project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Regional Wastewater Reclamation Department (PCRWRD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use. A sewer service agreement will be required at the Final Plat review stage. The Pima County Department of Environmental Quality and Regional Wastewater Reclamation Department hereby approve the above referenced submittal of the tentative or preliminary plat as submitted. Please note the following: Approval of the above referenced submittal does not authorize the construction of public or private sewer collection lines, or water distribution lines. Prior to the construction of such features, a Construction Authorization (Approval To Construct) may need to be obtained from the Pima County Environmental Quality. Also, air quality activity permits must be secured by the developer or prime contractor from the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality before constructing, operating or engaging in an activity which may cause or contribute to air pollution. If you have any questions regarding the above-mentioned comments, please contact me. |
| 04/24/2009 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | OTHER AGENCIES | PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS | Approved | CASE: S09-026 ALVERNON AND LEE OFFICES: TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW COMMENT: NO OBJECTIONS OR ADVERSE COMMENTS Vehicle Trip Generation: Daily: 716 PM Peak: 75 Please call if you have questions or need additional information. PLEASE UPDATE MAILING INFORMATION to avoid any unexpected delay The correct mailing information is PIMA ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS Attention: KoSok Chae ------------------------------------------- KoSok Chae, Ph.D. 177 N. Church Ave., Suite 405 Tucson, AZ 85701 520-792-1093 x487 [tel] 520-620-6981 [fax] www.PAGnet.org |
| 04/27/2009 | LIZA CASTILLO | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Approved | 4350 E. Irvington Road, Tucson, AZ 85714 Post Office Box 711, Tucson, AZ 85702 WR#209854 April 22, 2009 Presidio Engineering Attn: Tanya Grahn 4582 N 1st Avenue #120 Tucson, Arizona 85718 Dear Ms. Grahn : SUBJECT: Alvernon and Lee Office S09-026 Tucson Electric Power Company has reviewed and approved the development plan submitted April 10, 2009. It appears that there are no conflicts with the existing facilities within the boundaries of this proposed development. *Overhead facilities in area of new building* Enclosed is a copy of a TEP facilities map showing the approximate location of the existing facilities. Any relocation costs will be billable to the customer. In order to apply for electric service, call the New Construction Department at (520) 918-8300. Submit a final set of plans including approved site, electrical load, paving off-site improvements and irrigation plans, if available include a CD with the AutoCAD version of the plans. If easements are required, they will be secured by separate instrument. Your final plans should be sent to: Tucson Electric Power Company Attn: Ms. Mary Boice New Business Project Manager P. O. Box 711 (DB-101) Tucson, AZ 85702 520-917-8732 Should you have any technical questions, please call the area Designer Mike Kaiser at (520) 918-8244. Sincerely, Elizabeth Miranda Office Support Specialist Design/Build lm Enclosures cc: DSD_CDRC@tucsonaz.gov, City of Tucson (email) M. Kaiser, Tucson Electric Power |
| 04/27/2009 | JENNIFER STEPHENS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Denied | comments will post shortly |
| 04/27/2009 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES April 27, 2009 Tanya Grahn Presidio Engineering 4582 N. 1st Avenue #120 Tucson, Arizona 85718 Subject: S09-026 Alvernon and Lee Offices Tentative Plat Development Package Dear Tanya: Your submittal of April 10, 2009 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and 11 sets of the DETAILED cover letter explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLACKLINES MUST BE FOLDED 11 Copies Revised Tentative Plat Development Package (ADA, DUPD, Engineering, Zoning, Real Estate, ESD, Landscape, Traffic, ADOT, Addressing, DSD) 2 Copies Drainage Report (Engineering, DSD) 2 Copies Last approved site plans (Zoning, DSD) Should you have any questions, please call me at 837-4919. Sincerely, Patricia Gehlen CDRC Manager All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: 795-6747 Tp-resubmittal |
| 04/27/2009 | JENNIFER STEPHENS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Denied | 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 JENNIFER STEPHENS ADDRESSING OFFICIAL PH: 740-6480 FAX #: 740-6370 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: JENNIFER STEPHENS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL SUBJECT: S09-026 ALVERNON AND LEE OFFICES/TENTATIVE PLAT DATE: 4/30/09 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and we hereby approve this project. NOTE: ON FINAL PLAT: Delete address on all Title Blocks. Correct the street suffixes on 61.0 Landscape Plan and C2.0 water Harvesting Plan. ***The Pima County Addressing Section can use digital CAD drawing files when submitted with your final plat Mylar. These CAD files can be submitted through Pima County Addressing. The digital CAD drawing files expedite the addressing and permitting processes when we are able to insert this digital data into the County’s Geographic Information System. Your support is greatly appreciated.*** |