Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Plan Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Plan Number - S09-015
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Review Status: Completed
Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
07/21/2011 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
07/21/2011 | JOSE ORTIZ | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Approved | Per Jose Ortiz |
07/22/2011 | RONALD BROWN | ZONING HC | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | Confirm final details for all marked crossings in the right of way with DOT |
07/25/2011 | JENNIFER STEPHENS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Denied | AUDREY FARENGA ADDRESSING REVIEW PH #: 740-6800 FAX #: 623-5411 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: AUDREY FARENGA, ADDRESSING REVIEW SUBJECT: S09-015 SILVERBELL CROSSING/REVISED TENTATIVE PLAT DATE: July 25, 2011 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and the following matters must be resolved prior to our approval: 1. Add "A resubdivision of Silverbell Crossing " before "as recorded in book 62, Page 65" on all title blocks. 2. Add drive to Dales Crossing on sheet 5 per letter dated 03-30-11. 3. Delete Kippy Way on sheet 9 per letter dated 03-30-11. |
07/27/2011 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: David Rivera Principal Planner PROJECT: S09-015 Silverbell Crossings Tentative Plat and Final plat comments TRANSMITTAL DATE: July 27, 2011 DUE DATE: August 2, 2011 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. The Zoning Review Section approves the tentative plat for this subdivision, subject to the following changes on the executed tentative plat. However, should there be any changes requested by other CDRC members, the Zoning Review Section approval is void, and we request copies of the revised tentative plat to verify that those changes do not affect any zoning requirements. 2. Common Area "E" Detention Basin" has been left off the Title Block of all plan sheets. Revise and include in the title block of the tentative and final plat, Common area "E" as listed on the CC&R's title sheet. If the CC&Rs must be revised to reflect the new subdivision name and recordation of the plat, assure that the CC&Rs are drawn up to reflect the new name. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call David Rivera, (520) 791-5608. C:\planning\cdrc\tentativeplat\S09015.doc RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised tentative plat, final plat, CC&R's and additional requested documents. |
07/27/2011 | ELIZABETH LEIBOLD | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | DATE: July 27, 2011 TO: Patricia Gehlen; CDRC Coordinator SUBJECT: Silverbell Crossings Final & Tentative Plat 2nd submittal Engineering Re-review REVIEWER: Elizabeth Leibold ACTIVITY NUMBER: S09-015 SUMMARY: The revised Tentative and Final Plats (old case number: S04-188), was reviewed by Planning & Development Services Department Engineering Division. Approval is not recommended at this time until the following comments are addressed. TENTATIVE PLAT COMMENTS: Address the remaining comments for Tentative Plat: 1) DS Sec.2-03.2.4.L.6: The zone A FEMA revised floodplain limits per DFIRM 1669L is required to be labeled on the plat. Add label and delineations for the FIRM panel L information on Final and Tentative plat. Other flood data may remain on the sheets unless there is new drainage information from Silverbell improvements. 2) DS Sec.2-03: Provide the following documentation for Tentative Plat: a) D.S. 2-03.2.4.K: Copy of geotechnical reports and addenda, including the geotechnical addenda regarding the details showing slopes that exceed 2:1 (H:V). b) DS Sec.2-03.2.3: Documentation from WAPA regarding acceptance of the proposed improvements within the WAPA easement. c) Golf Course correspondence that verifies acceptance of flows from project as shown on the proposed Tentative Plat. d) Provide copies of drainage reports and any addenda for the onsite and Silverbell Road drainage. Onsite Drainage Report will need to include a maintenance list for all proposed drainage improvements and common areas that will be maintained by the HOA. e) The docket and page for both the south slope / access easement and the drainage easement for the pipe from basin to Golf Course. Label on Final and Tentative Plats. f) WAPA correspondence. 3) DS Sec.2-03.2.4.M: Show basin setback per geotechnical report for lots 98-102. 4) Assure that the descriptions of the common areas of the Final Plat title block match the CC&R's descriptions of the subdivision common areas and the descriptions in the assurance paperwork. Please be aware that the legal office may reject the assurance paperwork if the verbiage does not match exactly the verbiage on the Final Plat's Title Block. FINAL PLAT COMMENTS: DS Sec.2-03.6: Address the following Final Plat comments: 5) DS Sec.2-03.7.1.G: The final plat cannot be scheduled for Mayor and Council consideration until the financial assurances are approved. In response letter, state type of assurance proposed for the project. Address the following for the assurance package comments: a) For resubmittal of the third party trust assurances, provide: i) original copy of the AGREEMENT TO CONSTRUCT SUBDIVISION IMPROVEMENTS / THIRD PARTY TRUST with the assurable items list; ii) original copy of the AMENDMENT TO TRUST / THIRD PARTY TRUST; iii) assure that all exhibits are attached, and the case number "S09-015" is at the top of the first page of the AGREEMENT TO CONSTRUCT and AMENDMENT TO TRUST; iv) copy of the original Trust Agreement; v) copy of a sample Warranty Deed; vi) copy of the current Title Report. vii) The assurance descriptions and CC&R's shall match the title block description on the first sheet of the Final Plat. Please be aware that the legal office may reject assurance paperwork if the verbiage does not match exactly the verbiage on the Final Plat's Title Block. b) If there are basins located within a common area, revise title block to reflect the basin in common area description. c) For this and future projects, please provide a 8½" by 11" location map sheet for assurance submittals that go to Mayor & Council. Typically, these are similar to an enlarged location map on Final Plats. 6) DS Sec.2-03.6.5.B: Assure that all easements listed on the Schedule B of title report are clearly drawn, labeled with Book/page or Docket/page, and/or listed as a blanket easement, and/or labeled with accurate dimensions and bearings on the plat. 7) DS Sec.2-03.6.4.F: Revise note 12 on sheet 1 of Final Plat. This floodplain does impact the subdivision. 8) DS Sec.2-03.6.4.F: Show the limits of the 100-year floodprone area in a surveyable and readily retraceable manner with frequent ties to intersecting lot lines for all flows of one hundred (100) cfs or more. At minimum, label the zone A FEMA revised floodplain limits per DFIRM 1669L. Submit revised Tentative Plat, Final Plat, assurances, and other documentation with a detailed response letter. If you have questions or would like to schedule the meeting, call me at 837-4934. Elizabeth Leibold, P.E., CPM, CFM Civil Engineer Engineering Division Planning & Development Services Dept |
07/27/2011 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Approved | |
08/09/2011 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Denied | PIMA COUNTY REGIONAL WASTEWATER RECLAMATION DEPARTMENT 201 NORTH STONE AVENUE TUCSON, ARIZONA 85701-1207 JACKSON JENKINS PH: (520) 740-6500 DIRECTOR FAX: (520) 620-0135 August 5, 2011 To: Paul Nzomo CORONADO ENGINEERING Thru: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Manager City of Tucson Development Services Department ____________________________________________ From: Chad Amateau, PE (520-740-6719), Pima County Regional Wastewater Reclamation Department Subject: Silverbell Crossing Tentative Plat – 2nd Submittal S09-015 The Pima County Regional Wastewater Reclamation Department (PCRWRD) has reviewed the proposed sewer collection lines for the above-referenced project. The following comments are offered for your use: The minimum scale for a plan set to conduct a sewer plan review is 1” = 40’. Revise plans accordingly. (Ref A) The proposed point of connection references G-2005-157. This plan set was not permitted by RWRD and will need to be resubmitted for review. (Ref A) All offsite sewer (G-2005-157) shall be encompassed by a public sewer easement that shall be recorded and sequence number listed on tentative plat. (Ref A,C,D) All sheets. Label the elevation of proposed sewer that crosses storm drain pipe. (Ref A) The Common Area between lots 96-97 shall be a minimum of 24’ and shall be exclusively to sewer. (Ref A,C,D,E) Clearly show revisions on plans which have occurred post permitting. Sign and seal all plans which have been revised after permit issuance. (Ref A,C,D) Label all IMS manhole numbers for existing sewer. (Ref A) The Rim elevation of MH#4 is listed on sheet 14 as 86.97. The elevation at the center of the cul-de-sac is listed as 85.81. Based on this calculation the slope of the cul-de-sac would be approximately 10%. Please revise. (Ref A,E) Sheet 10, Section 7 & 10 label the vertical distance of the sewer relative to the storm drain pipe.(Ref A,C,D) Sheet 10, Section 16. Label the sewer with pipe length, slope, and manhole ID. (Ref A,C,D) Sheet 11, Section 2. Incorrect scale reference shown. (Ref A,C,D) Sheet 11, Section 5. Show and label sewer. (Ref A,C,D) Sheet 11, Section 3. Label the horizontal distance of the sewer relative the storm drain structure and label the vertical distance (Ref A,C,D) This office will require a revised set of bluelines, and a response letter, addressing these comments. Additional comments may be made during the review of these documents. Pima County Code Title 13.20.030.A.2 requires that a wastewater review fee be paid for each submittal of the development plan. The fee for the first submittal is $166 plus $50 per sheet. For the second submittal, the review fee is $50 per sheet. For all subsequent submittals, the review fee is $39 per sheet. The next submittal of this project will be the third (3rd) submittal. A check for the review fee of this submittal in the amount of $312.00 (made out to PIMA COUNTY TREASURER) must accompany the revised set of bluelines and response letter. If the number of sheets changes, please adjust the review fee accordingly. cc: Tom Porter, Sr CEA Checked by:_________ Kristin Greene, PE, DLU Manager DLU Project folder Ref. A. Development Plan Checklist Requirements – Chapter 18.71 of the Pima County Code - Section J http://www.pimaxpress.com/SubDivision/Documents/2006/DP_Requirements2Aug04.pdf Ref. C - Arizona Administrative Code, Title 18, Chapters 5 & 9 (R18-5-205) http://www.azsos.gov/public_services/Title_18/18-05.htm and (R-18-9-E301) http://www.azsos.gov/public_services/Title_18/18-09.htm Ref. D - PCRWRD Procedures, Preliminary Sewer Layout Requirements, 1984 (revised April 1988) http://www.pima.gov/wwm/eng/stddet/pdf/procedures.pdf Ref. E - PCRWRD Design Standards for Public Sewerage Facilities, 1983 (revised April 1988) http://www.pima.gov/wwm/eng/stddet/pdf/design_standards.pdf Ref. F - City of Tucson/Pima County Standard Details http://www.pima.gov/wwm/eng/stddet/pdf/all_det.pdf Ref. G - Pima County Code of Ordinances, Title 13 - Public Services, Division II - Sewers http://library.municode.com/index.aspx?clientID=16119&stateID=3&statename=Arizona Ref. H - City of Tucson/Pima County Standard Specifications for Public Improvements, 2003 Edition http://dot.pima.gov/transeng/stdspecsdet/standardspecs2003.pdf Ref. I - PCRWRD Engineering Directives http://www.pima.gov/wwm/eng/directives/ |
08/09/2011 | JOHN WILLIAMS | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES August 9, 2011 Paul Nzomo Coronado Engineering & Development Inc. 4007 E. Paradise Falls Dr. # 125 Tucson, Arizona 85712 Subject: S09-015 SILVERBELL CROSSINGS Tentative Plat Dear Paul: Your submittal of March 24, 2011 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a set of 5 DETAILED cover letters explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLACKLINES MUST BE FOLDED 5 Copies Revised Tentative Plat (Addressing, Zoning, Engineering, Wastewater, PDSD) 2 Copies Revised Geotechnical Reports & Addenda (Engineering, PDSD) 2 Copies Revised WAPA Documentation (Engineering, PDSD) 2 Copies Revised Drainage Report (Engineering, PDSD) 1 Check Made out to “Pima County Treasurer” for $312 (Wastewater) Should you have any questions, please call me at 837-4893. Sincerely, John Williams Planning Technician All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.tucsonaz.gov/dsd/ Via fax: (520) 722-5394 |