Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Plan Number: S09-015
Parcel: Unknown

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW

Plan Number - S09-015
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
07/21/2011 FERNE RODRIGUEZ START PLANS SUBMITTED Completed
07/21/2011 JOSE ORTIZ COT NON-DSD TRAFFIC Approved Per Jose Ortiz
07/22/2011 RONALD BROWN ZONING HC REVIEW Approv-Cond Confirm final details for all marked crossings in the right of way with DOT
07/25/2011 JENNIFER STEPHENS PIMA COUNTY ADDRESSING Denied AUDREY FARENGA
ADDRESSING REVIEW
PH #: 740-6800
FAX #: 623-5411


TO: CITY PLANNING
FROM: AUDREY FARENGA, ADDRESSING REVIEW
SUBJECT: S09-015 SILVERBELL CROSSING/REVISED TENTATIVE PLAT
DATE: July 25, 2011



The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and the following matters must be resolved prior to our approval:


1. Add "A resubdivision of Silverbell Crossing " before "as recorded in book 62, Page 65" on all title blocks.
2. Add drive to Dales Crossing on sheet 5 per letter dated 03-30-11.
3. Delete Kippy Way on sheet 9 per letter dated 03-30-11.
07/27/2011 DAVID RIVERA ZONING REVIEW Approv-Cond CDRC TRANSMITTAL

TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office
FROM: David Rivera
Principal Planner

PROJECT: S09-015
Silverbell Crossings
Tentative Plat and Final plat comments

TRANSMITTAL DATE: July 27, 2011

DUE DATE: August 2, 2011

COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed.

1. The Zoning Review Section approves the tentative plat for this subdivision, subject to the following changes on the executed tentative plat. However, should there be any changes requested by other CDRC members, the Zoning Review Section approval is void, and we request copies of the revised tentative plat to verify that those changes do not affect any zoning requirements.

2. Common Area "E" Detention Basin" has been left off the Title Block of all plan sheets. Revise and include in the title block of the tentative and final plat, Common area "E" as listed on the CC&R's title sheet.

If the CC&Rs must be revised to reflect the new subdivision name and recordation of the plat, assure that the CC&Rs are drawn up to reflect the new name.

If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call David Rivera, (520) 791-5608.

C:\planning\cdrc\tentativeplat\S09015.doc

RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised tentative plat, final plat, CC&R's and additional requested documents.
07/27/2011 ELIZABETH LEIBOLD ENGINEERING REVIEW Denied DATE: July 27, 2011
TO: Patricia Gehlen; CDRC Coordinator
SUBJECT: Silverbell Crossings Final & Tentative Plat 2nd submittal Engineering Re-review
REVIEWER: Elizabeth Leibold
ACTIVITY NUMBER: S09-015

SUMMARY: The revised Tentative and Final Plats (old case number: S04-188), was reviewed by Planning & Development Services Department Engineering Division. Approval is not recommended at this time until the following comments are addressed.

TENTATIVE PLAT COMMENTS:
Address the remaining comments for Tentative Plat:
1) DS Sec.2-03.2.4.L.6: The zone A FEMA revised floodplain limits per DFIRM 1669L is required to be labeled on the plat. Add label and delineations for the FIRM panel L information on Final and Tentative plat. Other flood data may remain on the sheets unless there is new drainage information from Silverbell improvements.
2) DS Sec.2-03: Provide the following documentation for Tentative Plat:
a) D.S. 2-03.2.4.K: Copy of geotechnical reports and addenda, including the geotechnical addenda regarding the details showing slopes that exceed 2:1 (H:V).
b) DS Sec.2-03.2.3: Documentation from WAPA regarding acceptance of the proposed improvements within the WAPA easement.
c) Golf Course correspondence that verifies acceptance of flows from project as shown on the proposed Tentative Plat.
d) Provide copies of drainage reports and any addenda for the onsite and Silverbell Road drainage. Onsite Drainage Report will need to include a maintenance list for all proposed drainage improvements and common areas that will be maintained by the HOA.
e) The docket and page for both the south slope / access easement and the drainage easement for the pipe from basin to Golf Course. Label on Final and Tentative Plats.
f) WAPA correspondence.
3) DS Sec.2-03.2.4.M: Show basin setback per geotechnical report for lots 98-102.
4) Assure that the descriptions of the common areas of the Final Plat title block match the CC&R's descriptions of the subdivision common areas and the descriptions in the assurance paperwork. Please be aware that the legal office may reject the assurance paperwork if the verbiage does not match exactly the verbiage on the Final Plat's Title Block.
FINAL PLAT COMMENTS:
DS Sec.2-03.6: Address the following Final Plat comments:
5) DS Sec.2-03.7.1.G: The final plat cannot be scheduled for Mayor and Council consideration until the financial assurances are approved. In response letter, state type of assurance proposed for the project. Address the following for the assurance package comments:
a) For resubmittal of the third party trust assurances, provide:
i) original copy of the AGREEMENT TO CONSTRUCT SUBDIVISION IMPROVEMENTS / THIRD PARTY TRUST with the assurable items list;
ii) original copy of the AMENDMENT TO TRUST / THIRD PARTY TRUST;
iii) assure that all exhibits are attached, and the case number "S09-015" is at the top of the first page of the AGREEMENT TO CONSTRUCT and AMENDMENT TO TRUST;
iv) copy of the original Trust Agreement;
v) copy of a sample Warranty Deed;
vi) copy of the current Title Report.
vii) The assurance descriptions and CC&R's shall match the title block description on the first sheet of the Final Plat. Please be aware that the legal office may reject assurance paperwork if the verbiage does not match exactly the verbiage on the Final Plat's Title Block.
b) If there are basins located within a common area, revise title block to reflect the basin in common area description.
c) For this and future projects, please provide a 8½" by 11" location map sheet for assurance submittals that go to Mayor & Council. Typically, these are similar to an enlarged location map on Final Plats.
6) DS Sec.2-03.6.5.B: Assure that all easements listed on the Schedule B of title report are clearly drawn, labeled with Book/page or Docket/page, and/or listed as a blanket easement, and/or labeled with accurate dimensions and bearings on the plat.
7) DS Sec.2-03.6.4.F: Revise note 12 on sheet 1 of Final Plat. This floodplain does impact the subdivision.
8) DS Sec.2-03.6.4.F: Show the limits of the 100-year floodprone area in a surveyable and readily retraceable manner with frequent ties to intersecting lot lines for all flows of one hundred (100) cfs or more. At minimum, label the zone A FEMA revised floodplain limits per DFIRM 1669L.

Submit revised Tentative Plat, Final Plat, assurances, and other documentation with a detailed response letter. If you have questions or would like to schedule the meeting, call me at 837-4934.

Elizabeth Leibold, P.E., CPM, CFM
Civil Engineer
Engineering Division
Planning & Development Services Dept
07/27/2011 JOE LINVILLE LANDSCAPE REVIEW Approved
08/09/2011 FERNE RODRIGUEZ PIMA COUNTY WASTEWATER Denied PIMA COUNTY
REGIONAL WASTEWATER RECLAMATION DEPARTMENT
201 NORTH STONE AVENUE
TUCSON, ARIZONA 85701-1207
JACKSON JENKINS PH: (520) 740-6500
DIRECTOR FAX: (520) 620-0135


August 5, 2011

To: Paul Nzomo
CORONADO ENGINEERING

Thru: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Manager
City of Tucson Development Services Department

____________________________________________
From: Chad Amateau, PE (520-740-6719), Pima County Regional Wastewater Reclamation Department

Subject: Silverbell Crossing
Tentative Plat – 2nd Submittal
S09-015

The Pima County Regional Wastewater Reclamation Department (PCRWRD) has reviewed the proposed sewer collection lines for the above-referenced project. The following comments are offered for your use:
The minimum scale for a plan set to conduct a sewer plan review is 1” = 40’. Revise plans accordingly. (Ref A)
The proposed point of connection references G-2005-157. This plan set was not permitted by RWRD and will need to be resubmitted for review. (Ref A)
All offsite sewer (G-2005-157) shall be encompassed by a public sewer easement that shall be recorded and sequence number listed on tentative plat. (Ref A,C,D)
All sheets. Label the elevation of proposed sewer that crosses storm drain pipe. (Ref A)
The Common Area between lots 96-97 shall be a minimum of 24’ and shall be exclusively to sewer. (Ref A,C,D,E)
Clearly show revisions on plans which have occurred post permitting. Sign and seal all plans which have been revised after permit issuance. (Ref A,C,D)
Label all IMS manhole numbers for existing sewer. (Ref A)
The Rim elevation of MH#4 is listed on sheet 14 as 86.97. The elevation at the center of the cul-de-sac is listed as 85.81. Based on this calculation the slope of the cul-de-sac would be approximately 10%. Please revise. (Ref A,E)
Sheet 10, Section 7 & 10 label the vertical distance of the sewer relative to the storm drain pipe.(Ref A,C,D)
Sheet 10, Section 16. Label the sewer with pipe length, slope, and manhole ID. (Ref A,C,D)
Sheet 11, Section 2. Incorrect scale reference shown. (Ref A,C,D)
Sheet 11, Section 5. Show and label sewer. (Ref A,C,D)
Sheet 11, Section 3. Label the horizontal distance of the sewer relative the storm drain structure and label the vertical distance (Ref A,C,D)

This office will require a revised set of bluelines, and a response letter, addressing these comments. Additional comments may be made during the review of these documents.

Pima County Code Title 13.20.030.A.2 requires that a wastewater review fee be paid for each submittal of the development plan. The fee for the first submittal is $166 plus $50 per sheet. For the second submittal, the review fee is $50 per sheet. For all subsequent submittals, the review fee is $39 per sheet.

The next submittal of this project will be the third (3rd) submittal. A check for the review fee of this submittal in the amount of $312.00 (made out to PIMA COUNTY TREASURER) must accompany the revised set of bluelines and response letter. If the number of sheets changes, please adjust the review fee accordingly.





cc: Tom Porter, Sr CEA Checked by:_________
Kristin Greene, PE, DLU Manager
DLU Project folder

Ref. A. Development Plan Checklist Requirements – Chapter 18.71 of the Pima County Code - Section J
http://www.pimaxpress.com/SubDivision/Documents/2006/DP_Requirements2Aug04.pdf

Ref. C - Arizona Administrative Code, Title 18, Chapters 5 & 9 (R18-5-205)
http://www.azsos.gov/public_services/Title_18/18-05.htm
and (R-18-9-E301)
http://www.azsos.gov/public_services/Title_18/18-09.htm

Ref. D - PCRWRD Procedures, Preliminary Sewer Layout Requirements, 1984 (revised April 1988)
http://www.pima.gov/wwm/eng/stddet/pdf/procedures.pdf

Ref. E - PCRWRD Design Standards for Public Sewerage Facilities, 1983 (revised April 1988)
http://www.pima.gov/wwm/eng/stddet/pdf/design_standards.pdf

Ref. F - City of Tucson/Pima County Standard Details
http://www.pima.gov/wwm/eng/stddet/pdf/all_det.pdf

Ref. G - Pima County Code of Ordinances, Title 13 - Public Services, Division II - Sewers
http://library.municode.com/index.aspx?clientID=16119&stateID=3&statename=Arizona

Ref. H - City of Tucson/Pima County Standard Specifications for Public Improvements, 2003 Edition
http://dot.pima.gov/transeng/stdspecsdet/standardspecs2003.pdf

Ref. I - PCRWRD Engineering Directives
http://www.pima.gov/wwm/eng/directives/
08/09/2011 JOHN WILLIAMS ZONING-DECISION LETTER REVIEW Denied COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE
PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES

August 9, 2011

Paul Nzomo
Coronado Engineering & Development Inc.
4007 E. Paradise Falls Dr. # 125
Tucson, Arizona 85712

Subject: S09-015 SILVERBELL CROSSINGS Tentative Plat

Dear Paul:

Your submittal of March 24, 2011 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a set of 5 DETAILED cover letters explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed:

ALL BLACKLINES MUST BE FOLDED

5 Copies Revised Tentative Plat (Addressing, Zoning, Engineering, Wastewater, PDSD)

2 Copies Revised Geotechnical Reports & Addenda (Engineering, PDSD)

2 Copies Revised WAPA Documentation (Engineering, PDSD)

2 Copies Revised Drainage Report (Engineering, PDSD)

1 Check Made out to “Pima County Treasurer” for $312 (Wastewater)

Should you have any questions, please call me at 837-4893.

Sincerely,



John Williams
Planning Technician

All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.tucsonaz.gov/dsd/

Via fax: (520) 722-5394