Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Plan Number: S09-015
Parcel: Unknown

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: REVISION - TENT PLAT & CORE RESUB

Plan Number - S09-015
Review Name: REVISION - TENT PLAT & CORE RESUB
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
03/24/2011 FERNE RODRIGUEZ START PLANS SUBMITTED Completed
03/25/2011 MARTIN BROWN COT NON-DSD FIRE Approved
03/28/2011 DAVID RIVERA ZONING REVIEW Approv-Cond CDRC TRANSMITTAL

TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office
FROM: David Rivera
Principal Planner

PROJECT: S09-015
Silverbell Crossings
Tentative Plat and Final plat comments

TRANSMITTAL DATE: March 28, 2011

DUE DATE: April 7, 2011

COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed.

1. The Zoning Review Section approves the tentative plat for this subdivision, subject to the following changes on the executed tentative plat. However, should there be any changes requested by other CDRC members, the Zoning Review Section approval is void, and we request copies of the revised tentative plat to verify that those changes do not affect any zoning requirements.

2. This is a re-subdivision of the previously approved and recorded plat. (Silverbell Crossings Book 62 page 65). The title block needs to reflect that this is a re-subdivision of the previous plat.

In addition, it is advised that the applicant verify with Pima County Subdivision Coordinator with regards to the name. Typically the county does not allow two different subdivision plats be recorded with the same name.

If the CC&Rs must be revised to reflect the new subdivision name and recordation of the plat, assure that the CC&Rs are drawn up to reflect the new name.

If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call David Rivera, (520) 791-5608.

C:\planning\cdrc\tentativeplat\S09015.doc

RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised tentative plat, final plat, CC&R's and additional requested documents.
03/30/2011 FERNE RODRIGUEZ UTILITIES TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER Approved >>> <MBurke@tep.com> 03/30/2011 3:28 PM >>>
SUBJECT: Silverbell Crossing Replat

Lots 1-143

S04-188, S09-015



Tucson Electric Power Company (TEP) has no objection to the Tentative
Plat submitted for review March 24, 2011.



Upon receipt of the Approved Tentative Plat, TEP will complete a
redesign of the lots that have been reconfigured due to the road
widening.



TEP will provide the preliminary electrical design on the approved
Tentative Plat within fifteen (15) working days upon receipt of the
plat. Additional plans necessary for preparation of the design are:
building plans including water, electrical, landscape, sidewalk and
paving plans. Also, submit the AutoCAD version of the plat on a CD or
email to me at the mburke@tep.com. Should you have any questions,
please contact me at 520-917- 8744.



Thank you,





Mary Burke

Associate Right of Way Agent

Tucson Electric Power Co.

offc-(520) 917-8744

fax-(520) 545-1567

cell-(520) 401-9895

mburke@tep.com
04/01/2011 FRODRIG2 ENV SVCS REVIEW Denied Due Date Case Number Project Address
March 31, 2011 S09-015 Silverbell Crossing Subdivision
Tent Plat Review


Comments: Denied
The Tentative Plat for the Silverbell Crossing Subdivision, Case No. S09-015, will
need to demonstrate the following requirements on the tentative plat before
approval is granted by Environmental Services:

1. The proposed storage location of APC containers for both Solid Waste and Recycle
Materials must be demonstrated on each lot, and a detail of the storage area must
be shown. Note that storage of APC containers will not be accepted within the
garage.

The end of Kippy Way Drive as shown on the Plat does not demonstrate
adequate turnaround space for Environmental Services collection vehicles. The
plan must clear this issue before approval by Environmental Services.



Environmental Services Department
Development Plan Review
Reviewer: Tony Teran
Office Phone (520) 837-3706
E-mail: Tony.Teran @tucsonaz.gov
04/05/2011 RONALD BROWN H/C SITE REVIEW Denied 1. On sheet 1, change note 31 to read
"This project will provide complete compliance with the Inclusive Home Design Ordinance 10463.
2. As per Section 1003.2, Provide at least one accessible entrance for each dwelling uint on an accessible route from public areas .
3. Please be aware of the provisions of Section 103.1, Wavier of Provisions in this Standard.
END OF REVIEW
04/05/2011 JOE LINVILLE LANDSCAPE REVIEW Denied Submit revised Landscape/Irrigation/NPP plans.
04/06/2011 ELIZABETH LEIBOLD ENGINEERING REVIEW Denied DATE: April 6, 2011
TO: Patricia Gehlen; CDRC Coordinator
SUBJECT: Silverbell Crossings Final & Tentative Plat 1st submittal Engineering Re-review
REVIEWER: Elizabeth Leibold
ACTIVITY NUMBER: S09-015

SUMMARY: The revised Tentative and Final Plats (old case number: S04-188), was reviewed by Planning & Development Services Department Engineering Division. Approval is not recommended at this time until the following comments are addressed.

FINAL and TENTATIVE PLAT COMMENTS:
1) Any remaining conditions from the previous plat still apply.
2) Provide the following documentation for Tentative Plat:
a) D.S. 2-03.2.4.K: Copy of geotechnical reports and addenda, including the geotechnical addenda regarding the details showing slopes that exceed 2:1 (H:V).
b) DS Sec.2-03.2.3: Documentation from WAPA regarding acceptance of the proposed improvements within the WAPA easement.
c) Golf Course correspondence that verifies acceptance of flows from project as shown on the proposed Tentative Plat.
d) Provide copies of drainage reports and any addenda for the onsite and Silverbell Road drainage. Onsite Drainage Report will need to include a maintenance list for all proposed drainage improvements and common areas that will be maintained by the HOA.
e) The docket and page for both the south slope / access easement and the drainage easement for the pipe from basin to Golf Course. Label on Final and Tentative Plats.
f) WAPA correspondence.
g) Other engineering associated documents that were accepted for the subdivision.
h) Any applicable variance documentation.
3) Explain how General Note 32 H on sheet 1 of Tentative Plat is met for this project.
4) It is recommended that the floodplain information reflect upcoming DFIRM data effective June 16, 2011, since final plat approvals may occur around time of the effective date of the new panel. Add label and delineations for the FIRM panel L information on Final and Tentative plat. Other flood data may remain on the sheets unless there is new drainage information from Silverbell improvements.
5) Explain proposed pipes adjacent to lot 61 at new entrance area on sheet 7 of the Tentative Plat. Explain and provide analysis with q100, velocity, erosion protection (especially for the existing monitoring wells), with additional grading detail for the area near the existing monitoring wells.
6) Explain water easement that was originally shown on previous plat that was located at south corner of project, and whether this is entirely within the new Baby Bruno alignment.
7) DS Sec.2-03.2.4.M: Show basin setback per geotechnical report for lots 98-102.
8) DS Sec.2-03.2.2.B.6: Label slope details to include "hand placed" rip rap per the variance if variance is still valid.
9) DS Sec.2-03.7.1.G: The final plat cannot be scheduled for Mayor and Council consideration until the financial assurances are approved. For third party trust subdivision assurances, provide full copy of new assurance documents.
10) Assure that the descriptions of the common areas of the Final Plat title block match the CC&R's descriptions of the subdivision common areas and the descriptions in the assurance paperwork. Please be aware that the legal office may reject the assurance paperwork if the verbiage does not match exactly the verbiage on the Final Plat's Title Block.
11) Sequencing numbers are required for final plats.
12) DS Sec.2-03.6.5.B: Assure that all easements listed on the Schedule B of title report are clearly drawn, labeled with Book/page or Docket/page, and/or listed as a blanket easement, and/or labeled with accurate dimensions and bearings on the plat.

Submit revised Tentative Plat, assurances, and other documentation with a detailed response letter. If you have questions or would like to schedule the meeting, call me at 837-4934.

Elizabeth Leibold, P.E., CPM, CFM
Civil Engineer
Engineering Division
Planning & Development Services Dept
04/07/2011 JOSE ORTIZ COT NON-DSD TRAFFIC Approv-Cond April 7, 2011
ACTIVITY NUMBER: S09-015
PROJECT NAME: Silverbell Crossing
PROJECT ADDRESS: Silverbell Road
PROJECT REVIEWER: Jose E. Ortiz PE, Traffic Engineer

Resubmittal Required: Traffic Engineering recommends a conditional approval of the Tentative Plat; therefore a revised Tentative Plat is required for re-submittal. The following item must be revised or added to the plat.

1. Ensure that the alignment of Baby Bruno Way matches the proposed median opening of the Silverbell Road RTA widening project. Schematically illustrate the future-widening of the project on the tentative plat for verification.


If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-4259 x76730 or Jose.Ortiz@tucsonaz.gov
04/08/2011 FERNE RODRIGUEZ PIMA COUNTY WASTEWATER Denied PIMA COUNTY
REGIONAL WASTEWATER RECLAMATION DEPARTMENT
201 NORTH STONE AVENUE
TUCSON, ARIZONA 85701-1207
JACKSON JENKINS PH: (520) 740-6500
DIRECTOR FAX: (520) 620-0135


April 6, 2011

To: PAUL NZOMO
CORONADO ENGINEERING & DEVELOPMENT, INC

Thru: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Manager
City of Tucson Development Services Department


____________________________________________
From: Tom Porter, Sr. CEA (520-740-6719), Pima County Regional Wastewater Reclamation Department

Subject: SILVERBELL CROSSINGS, LOTS 1-143 AND COMMON AREA'S "A, B, C, D & E"
Site Plan – 1st Submittal
S09-015

The Pima County Regional Wastewater Reclamation Department (PCRWRD) has reviewed the proposed sewer collection lines for the above-referenced project. The following comments are offered for your use:
Sheet 1-11: The submitted plan set appears to be a mix of two different submittals. Mark all of the submitted sheets with the plan number of S09-015 and with current engineer stamp. Reference the past development plan of S04-188 in the title block of the cover sheet.

Sheet 1: Add the following General Notes:

THE LANDSCAPING WITHIN ALL PUBLIC SEWER EASEMENTS SHOWN HEREON SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PLANTING GUIDELINES OF PC/COT STANDARD DETAIL WWM A-4.

NO PERMITS FOR PERMANENT STRUCTURES (I.E., MASONRY WALLS, FENCES, ETC.) ON OR THROUGH THE PUBLIC SEWER EASEMENT WILL BE ISSUED WITHOUT SEPARATE WRITTEN CONSENT OF PIMA COUNTY WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT.

Sheet 4 and 5: Call out the IMS #’s for all of the existing public manholes shown on plan.

Sheet 4: Clarify that the structures in easement called out by Keynotes 28 and 31 will not impede PCRWRD’s access per WWM-111.

Sheet 4 and 5: If the sewer line you show as existing does not exist, show it as proposed by others.

Sheet 5: Call out Keynote # 29 for the common area between MH -05 and Ex. MH# 11.

Sheet 8 and 9: Most of the sewer line segments are below the slope minimum of 0.44%. Please revise or provide documentation of approved variance.

This office will require a revised set of bluelines, and a response letter, addressing these comments. Additional comments may be made during the review of these documents.

Pima County Code Title 13.20.030.A.2 requires that a wastewater review fee be paid for each submittal of the development plan. The fee for the first submittal is $166 plus $50 per sheet. For the second submittal, the review fee is $50 per sheet. For all subsequent submittals, the review fee is $39 per sheet.

The next submittal of this project will be the second(2nd) submittal. A check for the review fee of this submittal in the amount of $250.00 (made out to PIMA COUNTY TREASURER) must accompany the revised set of bluelines and response letter. If the number of sheets changes, please adjust the review fee accordingly.



cc: Chad Amateau, PE Checked by:_________
Kristin Greene, PE, DLU Manager
DLU Project folder
04/11/2011 PGEHLEN1 COT NON-DSD COMMUNITY PLANNING Passed
04/11/2011 PGEHLEN1 PIMA COUNTY ADDRESSING Denied AUDREY FARENGA
ADDRESSING REVIEW
PH #: 740-6800
FAX #: 623-5411


TO: CITY PLANNING
FROM: AUDREY FARENGA, ADDRESSING REVIEW
SUBJECT: S09-015 SILVERBELL CROSSING/TENTATIVE PLAT
DATE: March 30, 2011



The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and the following matters must be resolved prior to our approval:

Include the resubdivision information on all title blocks.
Add Drive to Dales Crossing on sheet 5.
Delete Kippy Way on sheet 9.
04/11/2011 JOHN WILLIAMS ZONING-DECISION LETTER REVIEW Denied COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE
PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES

April 11, 2011

Paul Nzomo
Coronado Engineering & Development Inc.
4007 E. Paradise Falls Dr. # 125
Tucson, Arizona 85712

Subject: S09-015 SILVERBELL CROSSING Tentative Plat

Dear Paul:

Your submittal of March 24, 2011 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a set of 8 DETAILED cover letters explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed:

ALL BLACKLINES MUST BE FOLDED

8 Copies Revised Tentative Plat (Zoning, Landscape, HC Site, Engineering, Traffic, Wastewater, Addressing, PDSD)
4 Copies Revised Landscape/Irrigation Plans (Zoning, Landscape, Engineering, PDSD)
2 Copies Revised NPPO Plan (Landscape, PDSD)
2 Copies Geotechnical Reports and Addenda (Engineering, PDSD)
2 Copies Documentation from WAPA (Engineering, PDSD)
2 Copies WAPA Correspondence (Engineering, PDSD)
2 Copies Drainage Reports (Engineering, PDSD)
2 Copies Applicable Variance Documentation (Engineering, PDSD)
1 Check Made out to "Pima County Treasurer" for $250 (Wastewater)

Should you have any questions, please call me at (520) 837-4893.


Sincerely,


John Williams
Planning Technician

All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.tucsonaz.gov/dsd/

Via fax: 722-5394