Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Plan Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Plan Number - S09-005
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 04/02/2009 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 04/13/2009 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Approved | April 10, 2009 To: NATHAN ORTEGA RICK ENGINEERING Thru: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Manager City of Tucson Development Services Department ____________________________________________ From: Tom Porter, Sr. CEA (520-740-6719), representing the Pima County Departments of Regional Wastewater Reclamation Department and Environment Quality Subject: IN-N-OUT BURGER TP/DP – 2nd Submittal S09-005 The proposed sewer collection lines for the above-referenced project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Regional Wastewater Reclamation Department (PCRWRD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use. The Pima County Department of Environmental Quality and Wastewater Management Department hereby approve the above referenced submittal of the tentative or preliminary plat as submitted. Please note the following: Approval of the above referenced submittal does not authorize the construction of public or private sewer collection lines, or water distribution lines. Prior to the construction of such features, a Construction Authorization (Approval To Construct) may need to be obtained from the Pima County Environmental Quality. Also, air quality activity permits must be secured by the developer or prime contractor from the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality before constructing, operating or engaging in an activity which may cause or contribute to air pollution. If you have any questions regarding the above-mentioned comments, please contact me. |
| 04/21/2009 | TOM MARTINEZ | OTHER AGENCIES | AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION | Denied | Regional Traffic Engineering: - Traffic has no comments on this submittal and recommends CDRC approval. - The plans will be forwarded to the development engineer, Dan Williams, for his comments. Thank you. ________________________________ Confidentiality and Nondisclosure Notice: This email transmission and any attachments are intended for use by the person(s)/entity(ies) named above and may contain confidential/privileged information. Any unauthorized use, disclosure or distribution is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by email, and delete or destroy all copies plus attachments. 2009 |
| 04/21/2009 | TOM MARTINEZ | OTHER AGENCIES | AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION | Denied | ADOT owns Ajo Way right of way in fee title through this area and will be issuing any permits to the developer for ingress/egress to Ajo Way for this business. Daniel Williams, PE ADOT Tucson District 1221 S. 2nd Avenue Tucson, AZ 85713 520 388-4200 ________________________________ Confidentiality and Nondisclosure Notice: This email transmission and any attachments are intended for use by the person(s)/entity(ies) named above and may contain confidential/privileged information. Any unauthorized use, disclosure or distribution is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by email, and delete or destroy all copies plus attachments. 2009 |
| 04/23/2009 | RONALD BROWN | ZONING HC SITE | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Accessible Parking Signage: a. Dimension height of sign, 7' from bottom of sign to finished grade b. Please include a "Van Accessible" sign attached to the bottom of the main sign. 2. Detail A/2 of 11: The typical accessible parking plan is not typical to that as shown on the plan. Generic details are not acceptable. Please provide a large scale detrail of the accessible parking as designed and shown on the site plan. 3. For all accessible requirements in the Public Right of Way, COT DOT accessible requirements are the governing standards. Please provide a separate note referencing to that effect as opposed to note 3, ICC/ANSI requirements. 4. At note three, sheets 3 and 4 of 11: change the reference of 406.3 "Sides of Curb Ramps" to 406.12 and 406.14 "Detectable Warnings". a. Please provide a large scale detail of each different type of curb and/or side walk ramp complying with Sections 405 and 406 including all dimensions, slopes, detectable warnings as required, connection to marked crossing and accessible route and etc. This includes the ramp at the rounded curb island, both ramps of the marked crossing to building 6 and the 90 degree turn in the island to the East of building 1, which doers not have sufficient top of ramp landing space. 5. Provide concrete wheel stops at both accessible parking spaces to provide an auto block from hitting the accessible signage. END OF REVIEW |
| 04/27/2009 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: Southgate Business Park Tentative Plat/Development Plan S09-005 TRANSMITTAL DATE: April 27, 2009 DUE DATE: April 30, 2009 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. The Zoning Review Section conditionally approves the tentative plat/development plan for this subdivision, subject to the following changes on the executed tentative plat/development plan. However, should there be any changes requested by other CDRC members, the Zoning Review Section approval is void, and we request copies of the revised tentative plat to verify that those changes do not affect any zoning requirements. 2. D.S. 2-03.2.1.E Please clarify what the dashed line shown on the index drawing that runs east/west through proposed building 2 is for. 3. This comment was not addressed. Provide a dimension between the proposed canopy columns and the proposed bollards. D.S. 2-05.2.4.K There appears to be a canopy proposed for the north side of BUILDING 1. If this is the outside dining area than clearly show the required 4'-0" clear sidewalk area in regards to the seating area. 4. There is a planter called out on sheet 4 near the northeast corner of proposed building It appears that the planter has been removed and is not shown on the landscape plans, please clarify. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4956. C:\planning\cdrc\tentativeplat\S07-204tpca-2nd.doc RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised tentative plat, and additional requested documents. |
| 04/30/2009 | ANDY VERA | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 04/30/2009 | JENNIFER STEPHENS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Denied | 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 JENNIFER STEPHENS ADDRESSING OFFICIAL PH: 740-6480 FAX #: 740-6370 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: JENNIFER STEPHENS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL SUBJECT: S09-005 IN-N-OUT BURGER/TENTATIVE PLAT DATE: 4/29/09 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and the following matters must be resolved prior to our approval: Delete Kanmo Partners LLC. Add resubdivision information to all Title Blocks. This is the book and page of the plat (62/70) that is being resubdivided. The recorded book and page 12845/4927 does not need to be added to the Title Blocks. |
| 05/07/2009 | CDRC1 | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES May 7, 2009 nortega@rickengineering.com Subject: S09-005 IN-N-OUT BURGER Dear Nathan: Your submittal of April 2, 2009, for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a DETAILED cover letter explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLACKLINES MUST BE FOLDED 5 Copies Revised Tentative Plat (ADA, ADOT, Addressing, DSD, Zoning) 5 Copies Detailed cover letter explaining how each requirement has been addressed. Sincerely, Patricia Gehlen, 837-4919 CDRC Manager All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ |