Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Plan Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Plan Number - S09-005
Review Name: TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01/29/2009 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 01/30/2009 | DAVID MANN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | OK |
| 02/05/2009 | LIZA CASTILLO | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Approved | 4350 E. Irvington Road, Tucson, AZ 85714 Post Office Box 711, Tucson, AZ 85702 WR#207698 February 5, 2009 Rick Engineering Company, Inc. Attn: Nathan Ortega 3945 E Ft. Lowell Suite 111 Tucson, Arizona 85712 Dear Mr. Ortega : SUBJECT: In-n-Out Burgers S09-005 Tucson Electric Power Company has reviewed and approved the development plan submitted January 29, 2009. It appears that there are no conflicts with the existing facilities within the boundaries of this proposed development. *Ungerground 3-Phase primary in way of drive through* Enclosed is a copy of a TEP facilities map showing the approximate location of the existing facilities. Any relocation costs will be billable to the customer. In order to apply for electric service, call the New Construction Department at (520) 918-8300. Submit a final set of plans including approved site, electrical load, paving off-site improvements and irrigation plans, if available include a CD with the AutoCAD version of the plans. If easements are required, they will be secured by separate instrument. Your final plans should be sent to: Tucson Electric Power Company Attn: Ms. Mary Boice New Business Project Manager P. O. Box 711 (DB-101) Tucson, AZ 85702 520-917-8732 Should you have any technical questions, please call the area Designer, Mike Kaiser at (520) 918-8244. Sincerely, Elizabeth Miranda Office Support Specialist Design/Build lm Enclosures cc: DSD_CDRC@tucsonaz.gov, City of Tucson (email) M. Kaiser, Tucson Electric Power |
| 02/05/2009 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Denied | February 4, 2009 To: NATHAN ORTEGA RICK ENGINEERING Thru: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Manager City of Tucson Development Services Department ____________________________________________ From: Tom Porter, Sr. CEA (520-740-6719), representing the Pima County Departments of Wastewater Management and Environment Quality Subject: IN-N-OUT BURGER TP/DP - 1st Submittal S09-005 The proposed sewer collection lines for the above-referenced project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use. This project will be tributary to the Roger Road Wastewater Treatment Facility via the Southeast Interceptor. Obtain a letter from the PCWMD's Development Services Section, written within the past 90 days, stating that treatment and conveyance system capacity for the project is available in the downstream public sewerage system and provide a copy of that letter to this office. The required form to request such a letter may be found at: http://www.pima.gov/wwm/forms/docs/CapResponseRequest.pdf. The development plan for this project cannot be approved until a copy of this letter has been received by this office. Sheet 1: Revise General Note #16 to read as follows: THE ON-SITE SANITARY SEWERS, EXCEPT PUBLIC SEWERS WITHIN PUBLIC SEWER EASEMENTS OR RIGHTS-OF-WAY, WILL BE PRIVATE AND WILL BE CONSTRUCTED, OPERATED AND MAINTAINED ON A PRIVATE BASIS, AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH AN APPROVED OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE PLAN, IF REQUIRED. THE LOCATION AND METHOD OF CONNECTION TO AN EXISTING PUBLIC SANITARY SEWER IS SUBJECT TO REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE PIMA COUNTY WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT. Sheet 7 and 8: Revise the inverts at all connections of 6” to 8” private sewer. A 1.1’ difference in inverts are currently shown. Sheet 7: Show the off-site sewer and the public manhole on site as existing. Sheet 7: Show the correct IMS #’s for all of the existing public sewer manholes including the MH shown as MH #8177-06 which should be #3454-01. This office will require a revised set of bluelines, and a response letter, addressing these comments. Additional comments may be made during the review of these documents. Pima County Code Title 13.20.030.A.2 requires that a wastewater review fee be paid for each submittal of the development plan. The fee for the first submittal is $166 plus $50 per sheet. For the second submittal, the review fee is $50 per sheet. For all subsequent submittals, the review fee is $39 per sheet. The next submittal of this project will be the second (2nd) submittal. A check for the review fee of this submittal in the amount of $150.00 (made out to PIMA COUNTY TREASURER) must accompany the revised set of bluelines and response letter. If the number of sheets changes, please adjust the review fee accordingly. If you have any questions regarding the above-mentioned comments, please contact me. |
| 02/09/2009 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 02/23/2009 | JOSE ORTIZ | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Approved | |
| 02/23/2009 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approved | February 23,2009 S09-005 Tentative Plat Review. The Engineering Division recommends approval. Loren Makus, EIT |
| 02/24/2009 | JOHN BEALL | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Approved | DEPARTMENT OF URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT S09-005 In-N-Out Burger Reviewed: (X) Tentative Plat/Development Plan (X) Landscape Plan CROSS REFERENCE: C9-02-32 & S05-255 NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: Kino Area Plan GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: No COMMENTS DUE BY: February 27, 2009 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: (XX) Proposal Complies with Rezoning Conditions REVIEWER: drcorral 791-4505 DATE: 02/17/09 |
| 02/26/2009 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: Southgate Business Park Tentative Plat/Development Plan S09-005 TRANSMITTAL DATE: February 26, 2009 DUE DATE: February 27, 2009 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. Section 4.1.7.1, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a tentative plat. If, at the end of that time, the tentative plat has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this tentative plat is January 28, 2010. 2. As this project will work as a shopping center provide a copy of cross access agreement. 3. D.S. 2-03.2.1.E The index drawing is missing page references for the southern and northern areas of the plat/plan. The only page reference is for pages 4, 6, & 8. 4. D.S. 2-03.2.2.B.1 & D.S. 2-05.2.2.B.8 Place the S09-005 subdivision case number in the lower right corner of the plat next to the title block. 5. D.S. 2-03.2.2.B.5 & D.S. 2-05.2.2.B.3 Revise General Note 3 to include the Food Service "34", subject to: Sec. 3.5.4.6.C 6. D.S. 2-03.2.4.B All existing zoning classifications on and adjacent to the project (including across any adjacent right-of-way) shall be indicated on the drawing with zoning boundaries clearly defined. 7. D.S. 2-03.2.4.E & D.S. 2-05.2.4.C There are numerous references to "FUTURE PHASE" on the plat/plan. If this project is phased, each phase must comply with Code requirements as a separate entity. Provide calculations and setback dimensions indicating how this is achieved. Show phase lines on the drawing. 8. D.S. 2-05.2.4.D.3 Show the 6 required vehicle stacking spaces for the drive through lane on the plan, see D.S. 305.2.1.C.2.c for stacking requirements. 9. D.S. 2-05.2.4.D.3 Provide a parking area access lane (PAAL) width dimension for the PAAL located at the southeast corner of BLOCK B. 10. D.S. 2-05.2.4.D.3 Provide a parking area access lane (PAAL) width dimension for the PAAL located along the west property line of BLOCK B and the vehicle parking spaces along the west border of this project. 11. D.S. 2-05.2.4.D.3 Provide a parking area access lane (PAAL) width dimension for the PAAL located between the 12x55 loading space, located at the west end of UNIT 5, and the trash enclosure to the west. 12. D.S. 2-05.2.4.D.I Provide zoning setback dimensions from what appears to be a canopy over the drive-thru to the back of future curb along Ajo Way. Based on the building height of 36'-0" shown on the plan it does not appear that this canopy will meet the required setback of 21'-0" or the height of the building wall, which ever is greatest. 13. D.S. 2-05.2.4.K There is a keynote 2 that calls out "PROPOSED 5'-0" WIDE CONCRETE SIDEWALK (TYP) through out the plat/plan. The majority of sidewalks shown on the plan also have a 2.5' vehicle overhang shown. If vehicle overhangs are proposed than the minimum width of the sidewalk including the overhang is 6.5'. Show this dimension on the plans. 14. D.S. 2-05.2.4.K The sidewalk shown along the east property line of BLOCK B must be 6.5' wide or provided wheel stops to prevent vehicle from overhanging the sidewalk. 15. D.S. 2-05.2.4.K There appears to be a canopy proposed for the north side of BUILDING 1. If this is the outside dining area than clearly show the required 4'-0" clear sidewalk area in regards to the seating area. 16. D.S. 2-05.2.4.K Clarify what the purpose of the curb access ramp, shown at the southwest corner of BUILDING 1. is for. This appears to be a safety hazard for a disabled person by directly them in to a drive-thru lane. 17. D.S. 2-05.2.4.N Provide the heights for all proposed canopies within the footprints on the plan. 18. D.S. 2-05.2.4.O Show the maneuvering area for the proposed loading space. Zoning recommends that the loading space be relocated to the east end of the parking area outside of the landscape island to facilitate maneuvering into and out of the loading space. 19. D.S. 2-05.2.4.D.Q Please review the revised D.S. 2-09.0 and revise the Class 2 bicycle detail as the ribbon style rack is not an acceptable bike rack. 20. D.S. 2-05.2.4.D.Q The bicycle parking calculation is not correct. 8% of 42, the number of vehicle parking spaces shown on the plan, equal 3 required bicycle parking spaces. 21. D.S. 2-05.2.4.D.V If applicable, indicate the location and type of postal service. 22. D.S. 2-05.2.4.D.W If applicable, Indicate the locations and types of proposed signs (wall, free-standing, pedestal) on the plan. 23. As BLOCKS A & B can stand alone, be sold, provide separate Floor Area Ratio (FAR) calculation for BLOCKS A, B and the remaining block. 24. Provide a copy of the cross access agreement required for this development. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4956. C:\planning\cdrc\tentativeplat\S07-204tpca.doc RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised tentative plat, and additional requested documents. |
| 02/26/2009 | RONALD BROWN | ZONING HC SITE | REVIEW | Denied | 26 FEBRUARY 2009 S09-005/IN AND OUT BURGER REVIEWED BY RON BROWN ACCESSIBLE REVIEW 2006 IBC/ICC 117.1 DENIED: SEE COMMENTS BELOW A. DENOTE GOVERNING ACCESSIBILITY CODE; 2006 IBC/ICC 117.1 FOR PRIVATE PROPERTY, SECTIONS 405 AND 406 IS FOR PRIVATE PROPERTY CURB AND SIDE WALK RAMPS. MAKE ALL NECESSARY REFERENCE NOTE AND DETAIL CHANGES ON ALL DRAWINGS TO THAT EFFECT. ADD ANOTHER NOTE REFERENCING TO 2006 IBC, CHAPTER 11 AND ICC ANSI 117.1 FOR ALL RAMPS AND MARKED CROSSINGS. CHANGE ALL RAMP REFERENCE NOTES SHOWN WITHIN THE PROPERTY LINE TO THIS NEW NOTE B. RIGHT OF WAY ACCESSIBILITY STANDARDS; COT DOT STANDARDS FOR CURB RAMPS AT DRIVE WAYS. STANDARD DETAIL 207 IS FOR PUBLIC R.O.W. RAMPS ONLY. C. VERIFY ACCESSIBILITY TO ALL BUILDING ENTRANCES AS REQUIRED PER 2006 IBC SECTION 1105 AND ICC 117.1, SECTIONS 302 AND 303. D. ACCESSIBLE PARKING: 1. THE ACCESSIBLE PARKING LARGE SCALE PLAN DETAIL A/2 IS NOT SPECIFIC TO SITE PLAN LAYOUT. PLEASE CHANGE DETAIL TO REFLECT ACTUAL PROPOSED PARKING LAYOUT SHOW ON SITE PLAN. a. DETECTABLE WARNINGS ARE ONLY REQUIRED AT PARKING AISLE WHEN THE AISLE IS PART OF A MARKED CROSSING. b. THE PARKING SIGN IS TO BE 7' A.F.G. TO BOTTOM OF SIGN. ADD A VAN ACCESSIBLE SIGN. 2. THE SITE PLAN ACCESSIBLE PARKING IS NOT REQUIRED TO HAVE DETECTABLE WARNINGS AT THE CURB LINE. DELETE ALL REFERENCES TO "ADA". GOVERNING ACCESSIBLE CODE IS 2006 IBC, CHAPTER 11 AND ICC ANSI 117.1 E. AT THE SOUTH WEST CORNER OF BUILDING 1, THERE IS A SIDEWALK RAMP AND DETECTABLE WARNING LEADING ACCESS TO THE VEHICLE DRIVE THRU PAAL. THIS IS A HAZARD FOR THE VISION IMPAIRED BY DIRECTING THEM INTO A HAZARD TRAFFIC AREA AND NOT PROVIDING A COMPLETE MARKED CROSSING. IF AN ACCESS IS DESIRED HERE, DO NOT MAKE IT ACCESSIBLE. END OF REVIEW |
| 03/03/2009 | TOM MARTINEZ | OTHER AGENCIES | AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION | Denied | ADOT has no comments on this project. However, Regional Traffic would like some type of signal analysis stating that the proposed development will not affect the current Level of Service at the intersection of SR-86 and the I-10 off ramp. Thank you. ________________________________ Confidentiality and Nondisclosure Notice: This email transmission and any attachments are intended for use by the person(s)/entity(ies) named above and may contain confidential/privileged information. Any unauthorized use, disclosure or distribution is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by email, and delete or destroy all copies plus attachments. 2009 |
| 03/04/2009 | ANDY VERA | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Denied | 1. This user type will generate a good volume of solid waste materials... Relocate or add a single enclosure so distance does not exceed 120 ft from building 1 and demonstrates reasonable access for user. Access and maneuverability is adequate as shown. Please provide corrections on resubmittal. If you have any questions you may contact Andy Vera at (520) 791-5543 ext 1212 or e-mail: Andy.Vera@tucsonaz.gov |
| 03/12/2009 | JENNIFER STEPHENS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Denied | 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 JENNIFER STEPHENS ADDRESSING OFFICIAL PH: 740-6480 FAX #: 740-6370 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: JENNIFER STEPHENS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL SUBJECT: S09-005 IN-N-OUT BURGER/DEVELOPMENT PLAN DATE: 3/10/09 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and the following matters must be resolved prior to our approval: Label project number on all sheets. Delete all owner and parcel information for surrounding properties on all applicable sheets. Spell out all street suffixes on all applicable sheets. Delete “See project S05-255” from project overview, sheet 1. Delete “COT Ward #5” from Location Map. Add recorded information in Title Block. Delete 14-21, 22-31, 32-37 on building 3, 4 and 5, sheet 3. Make building 3 label visible, sheets 3 & 7. Delete larger numbers from units on all sheets. Delete RD from Ajo, sheet 4. Correct Duval to Duvall, on sheet 9. Complete label for building 5, sheet 10. Add label for unit 20 , sheet 10. |
| 03/12/2009 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES March 12, 2009 Nathan Ortega Rick Engineering Company, Inc. 3945 East Fort Lowell Road, Suite 111 Tucson, Arizona 85712 Subject: S09-005 In-N-Out Burger Development Plan/Tentative Plat Dear Nathan: Your submittal of January 29, 2009 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and 7 sets of the DETAILED cover letter explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLACKLINES MUST BE FOLDED 7 Copies Revised Tentative Plat (Wastewater, ADA, Zoning, ADOT, ESD, Addressing, DSD) 2 Copies Revised Landscape Plan (Zoning, DSD) 2 Copies Cross Access Agreement (Zoning, DSD) 2 Copies Signal Analysis (ADOT, DSD) Should you have any questions, please call me at 837-4919. Sincerely, Patricia Gehlen CDRC Manager All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: 322-6956 Tp-resubmittal |