Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Plan Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: CORE REVIEW
Plan Number - S08-101
Review Name: CORE REVIEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 08/11/2008 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 08/12/2008 | JIM EGAN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | |
| 08/18/2008 | RONALD BROWN | ZONING HC SITE | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Add a Generel Note that all site and future home construction will be in compliance with COT Ordinance 10463, The Inclusive Home Design Ordinance, effective 1 JAN 08. This applies to all lots. |
| 08/19/2008 | LIZA CASTILLO | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Approved | SUBJECT: TRES PUEBLOS ESTE S08-101 Tucson Electric Power Company (TEP) has no objection to the preliminary plat submitted for review August 11, 2008. TEP will provide a preliminary electrical design on the Approved Tentative Plat within (type out number) (15) working days upon receipt of the plat. Additional plans necessary for preparation of the design are: building plans including water, electrical, landscape, sidewalk and paving plans. Also, submit the AutoCAD version of the plat on a CD or email to lcastillo@tep.com <mailto:lcastillo@tep.com> . Liza Castillo, Right of Way Agent II Tucson Electric Power Co. Unisource Energy Services offc-(520) 917-8745 fax-(520) 545-1416 lcastillo@tep.com <mailto:lcastillo@tep.com> |
| 09/03/2008 | CDRC1 | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Denied | September 2, 2008 To: DAN CASTRO RICK ENGINEERING Thru: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Manager City of Tucson Development Services Department ___________________________ From: Tom Porter, Sr. CEA (520-740-6579), representing the Pima County Departments of Wastewater Management and Environment Quality Subject: TRES PUEBLOS ESTE, LOTS 1-163 & COMMON AREAS "A-1" THRU "A-3" & "B-1" THRU "B-4" Tent. Plat - 1st Submittal S08-101 The proposed sewer collection lines for the above-referenced project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use. 1. This project will be tributary to the Roger Road Wastewater Treatment Facility via the Southeast Interceptor. Obtain a letter from the PCWMD's Development Services Section, written within the past 90 days, stating that treatment and conveyance system capacity for the project is available in the downstream public sewerage system and provide a copy of that letter to this office. The required form to request such a letter may be found at: http://www.pima.gov/wwm/forms/docs/CapResponseRequest.pdf. The tentative or preliminary plat for this project cannot be approved until a copy of this letter has been received by this office. 2. Sheet 1: Revise General Note #12 to read as follows: THE ON-SITE SANITARY SEWAGE COLLECTION LINES WILL BE PUBLIC AND DESIGNED AND CONSTRUCTED TO PIMA COUNTY WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT STANDARDS. ALL BUILDING CONNECTION SEWERS WILL BE PRIVATELY MAINTAINED. 3. Sheet 2-6: Show the size of pipe and material for the proposed public sewer line on plan. 4. Sheet 3: Show the complete IMS # for all of the existing public manholes shown on plan. 5. Sheet 3: The inverts shown for the existing public manhole #3696-39 do not correspond to the depth of manhole shown on Map Guide. Verify the values shown on plan. This office will require a revised set of bluelines, and a response letter, addressing these comments. Additional comments may be made during the review of these documents. Pima County Code Title 13.20.030.A.2 requires that a wastewater review fee be paid for each submittal of the tentative or preliminary plat. The fee for the first submittal is $166 plus $50 per sheet. For the second submittal, the review fee is $50 per sheet. For all subsequent submittals, the review fee is $39 per sheet. The next submittal of this project will be the second (2nd) submittal. A check for the review fee of this submittal in the amount of $250.00 (made out to PIMA COUNTY TREASURER) must accompany the revised set of bluelines and response letter. If the number of sheets changes, please adjust the review fee accordingly. If you have any questions regarding the above-mentioned comments, please contact me. |
| 09/03/2008 | KAY MARKS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Approv-Cond | 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 JENNIFER STEPHENS ADDRESSING OFFICIAL PH: 740-6480 FAX #: 740-6370 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: JENNIFER STEPHENS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL SUBJECT: S08-101 TRES PUEBLOS ESTE/REVISED TENTATIVE PLAT DATE: 9/02/08 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and we hereby approve this project. NOTE: ON FINAL PLAT: 1.) Change Tucson Airport Commerce Center to Country Club Commerce Center on page 5. ***The Pima County Addressing Section can use digital CAD drawing files when submitted with your final plat Mylar. These CAD files can be submitted through Pima County Addressing. The digital CAD drawing files expedite the addressing and permitting processes when we are able to insert this digital data into the County's Geographic Information System. Your support is greatly appreciated.*** |
| 09/04/2008 | ROGER HOWLETT | COT NON-DSD | URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN | Denied | DEPARTMENT OF URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN COMMENTS Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT S08-101 Tres Pueblos Este Core Review 9/4/09 Items reviewed: Tentative Plat and Landscape Plan Related annexation, rezoning, CDRC cases: N/A Land Use Plan: Kino Area Plan Gateway or Scenic Route: Tucson Blvd. is a Gateway Route COMMENTS DUE BY: 9/9/08 Please address the comments below, and resubmit the tentative plat and landscape plan: 1) Please show the phasing lines on the plat. 2) Please add recreational facilities (active or passive) in Common Areas B-1 and B-4, and show them on the plat and landscape plan. 3) Please revise the view wall detail on plat sheet 2/6, so that the solid masonry portion at the bottom is no higher than 2'-6". 4) The Rodeo Wash linear park needs to be constructed in entirety at the beginning of the project, with the road, and not in phases. Please revise General Note #19 to read as follows: "Except for the Rodeo Wash linear park, all improvements and amenities …" Please add a new General Note that says, " The Rodeo Wash linear park and related amenities, including but not limited to landscaping, must be completed, and accepted by the City of Tucson, prior to the issuance of the first occupancy permit for a residential unit." 5) Please revise the pathway detail so that 2-foot-wide clear areas are provided on each side of the trail, for a 14-foot (total) corridor width. S08-101, Tres Pueblos Este 6) Regarding the trail easement, please change the wording on sheet 2/6 so that it reads as follows: "90' public, non-motorized recreation and trail easement granted to the City of Tucson by final plat." Please contact the reviewer below if you would like to discuss any of the above comments. REVIEWED BY: Joanne Hershenhorn, 837-6965 or 791-4505 DATE: 9/4/08 S:\Case_Review\CDRC\S08-101 Tres Pueblos Este Core Review.doc |
| 09/08/2008 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 09/09/2008 | ELIZABETH EBERBACH | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | TO: Patricia Gehlen; CDRC Manager SUBJECT: Tres Pueblos II (Este) (S05-134) Subdivision Tentative Plat counter Engineering Review REVIEWER: Elizabeth Eberbach ACTIVITY NUMBER: S08-101 SUMMARY: Revised Tentative Plat package documents were submitted for core review. The revised Tentative Plat, revised Drainage Report, and Landscape documents were reviewed by Engineering. Development Services Department Engineering Division does not recommend approval at this time. The Drainage Report was reviewed for Tentative Plat purposes only. PROJECT SAC SUMMARY: The Tres Pueblos Este project proposes encroachment into the Rodeo W.A.S.H. Ordinance wash. The existing Rodeo Wash is a constructed channel, approximately 8 feet deep and top width 80 feet, with earthen bottom and 3.5:1(H:V) side slopes. Proposed encroachment includes proposed basin outflow pipes with gabion outlet structures that cross the W.A.S.H. Study Area and continue into the wash channel slopes at two locations on the north and northwest sides of the project. A shallow weir is to be constructed outside of the 50-ft W.A.S.H. Study Area near one of the north basins to allow for sheet flow conditions across the W.A.S.H. Study Area. There is also proposed trail / maintenance road, paved pathways, weirs, scuppers, railing, basin channel, access ramps, and landscaping proposed within the Rodeo W.A.S.H. Study Area. A SAC meeting has been completed under S05-134. Engineering maintains acceptance the W.A.S.H. Report. OVERLAY COMMENTS: 1) DS Sec.2-03.2.2.B.7: Regarding special overlay zone, submit copy of the W.A.S.H. Report and extra copy of the W.A.S.H. exhibit "Drainage Details for Rodeo Wash at Tres Pueblos Este". DRAINAGE REPORT COMMENTS: 2) City of Tucson Development Standards (DS) Section No.2-03.2.4.L: Address the following comments for the Drainage Report: a) In drainage report, include discussion of Rodeo W.A.S.H. section for on/off site conditions. Include discussion of authority for maintenance of the W.A.S.H. b) Provide drainage maintenance checklist in report, providing operating conditions and stating how maintenance personnel are to address drainage problems on the site. c) Add details for outlets to existing Rodeo W.A.S.H. area on a drainage exhibit. 3) DS Sec.2-03.2.4.L: Address the following drainage comments for the Tentative Plat: a) Drainage channel section E/1 shows 1:1(H:V) with gunite. On this detail, clarify reinforcement requirements per geotechnical report. b) DS Sec.10-02.2.3.1.6.A.4.a: Riprap areas shall show thickness of minimum D50 unless the rip rap is handplaced. Revise drainage report and all tentative plat details to reflect geotechnical report and show adequate thickness of rip rap. c) DS Sec.10-02.2.3.1.6 A.4.d: The Geotechnical Report discusses provision for 15-ft of drainage away from structures. Show how lots provide for this on the tentative plat typical lot details and discuss building setbacks, with dimensions between structures (pavement or buildings) and any proposed basins or drainageways in revised drainage report. d) DS Sec.10-02.2.3.1.6.A.4: Regarding detail M/6, clarify whether cut-off wall is needed at end of pipe. e) For N/6, O/6, & P/6 details, show existing and proposed grades at outlet structures. f) Many cross sections and hydraulic section calculations do not match the geotechnical report for slope stability. Slopes steeper than 1.5:1(H:V) shall be reinforced per prior comment letter reference to geotechnical report. Also slopes between 2:1(H:V) and 1.5:1(H:V) shall be grouted rip rap or wire tied riprap. Revise channel sections and calculations to match geotechnical report. 4) In drainage report and in detail T/6, provide cross section for basin pipes crossing utility pipes in proposed street. Show sufficient cover over pipes and WSEL below road structure, show WSEL and provide minimum distance dimensioning between top of water and sewer utility pipes and bottom of stormwater pipe, as well as minimum dimension between top of stormwater pipe and bottom of pavement. TENTATIVE PLAT COMMENTS: 5) DS Sec.10-02.1.5.1: Address the following trail comments: a) The 80' drainage easement is indicated to be maintained by Pima County and the proposed trail is indicated by notation to lie within the Pima County drainage easement area and specifically on the existing maintenance access road as noted on the planview sheets. If the existing maintenance road lies within this existing drainage easement, provide a letter from the county regarding their authorization of proposed design for the proposed trail and its maintenance within the drainage easement. Otherwise, provide a trail location that does not overlap the maintenance access road. It was stated in response letter that this would be coordinated with Pima County; provide correspondence regarding acceptance of design. b) Detail H/2 appears to be missing. c) The trail is proposed to be built over access road. Provide a cross section showing that the crossings shall be traversable by motorized vehicle and pedestrians. Show that maintenance vehicles access is not obstructed. d) Label proposed materials. e) Clarify / show proposed easements for drainage outlets to be maintained by HOA. 6) Per D.S. 2-03.2.4.K: Regarding the conceptual grading design for the project, address the following comments: a) Clarify / provide cross sections for the following areas for clarification of conceptual grading: i) For details N/6, O/6, & P/6, provide existing and proposed grades at outlet structures. Also, depict existing slope of wash, top of bank, elevated maintenance road, trail, and rear of a proposed lot. ii) Provide existing elevation sections for the north side of the project to include a lot pad elevation near lots 16 and 159 through the basins and outlet channels, with existing and proposed grades, slopes, property line, setbacks, and to the adjacent wash. Detail K is insufficient since it does not depict existing and proposed grades. Detail K should show setback from basin as well. iii) Revise sections D/1, F/1, & G/1 to reflect erosion protection rip rap to extend up to water surface elevation in each section. b) To assure the tentative plat lot layout provides for sufficient horizontal area for slope run outs, swales, and other parameters, and also for clarification of proposed flow conditions on these RCP lots, clarify typical lot grading detail, that shows direction of drainage around proposed lots and explains the following: i) Show/clarify area for utility pads / mechanical equipment or A/C unit locations, if it is located along the side yards. ii) Show any building setbacks to swales, slope setbacks for screen walls, minimum side and rear building setbacks, per geotechnical report and drainage report. iii) On sheet 6, assure Side Yard Drainage Section complies with geotechnical recommendations for minimum sideyard setback dimensions for positive drainage away from structures. 7) DS Sec.10-01.III.3.5.1.3.a, 10-02.14.2.6: Submit a copy of the geotechnical report including minimum slope recommendations, boring test results, and basin percolation results. The soils report shall also include minimum distance from foundations to drainage swales. 8) Add linetypes to legend - check delineations to assure all linetypes are represented on planview and legend. Specfically all clarify floodplain lines. 9) Submit a copy of the current title report to assure all easements have been addressed. Submit geotechnical report, revised Drainage Report, revised Tentative Plat, drainage report response letter, copies of W.A.S.H. documentation, title report, complete tentative plat response letter, and any other supporting documentation such as the Pima County letter. The tentative plat will be denied until all comments are addressed. Call if you have any questions, 837-4934. Elizabeth Eberbach, PE Civil Engineer Engineering Division Development Services |
| 09/09/2008 | ANDY VERA | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Approved | All lots have adequate street frontage access for APC curbside refuse and recycle collection services. |
| 09/10/2008 | PETER MCLAUGHLIN | ZONING | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | PROJECT:Tres Pueblos Este Lots 1-163 Tentative Plat (1st Review) S08-101 ref: S05-134 TRANSMITTAL: August 20, 2008 COMMENTS: 1. Section 4.1.7.1, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a tentative plat. If, at the end of that time, the tentative plat has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this tentative plat is August 10, 2009. 2. Add the CDRC subdivision case number (S08-101) along with any other related case numbers and the expired subdivision case number (S05-134) in the lower right corner of each sheet on the tentative and final plat, landscape and NPPO plans. DS 2-03.2.2.B.1 3. The Final Plat may not be approved until the CC&R's are reviewed and approved by the Zoning Review Section. The CC&R's must meet criteria listed in L.U.C. 3.6.1.5. If applicable, the CC&R's must also detail the restrictions on any proposed natural areas. D.S. 2-10.3.2.E; L.U.C. 3.6.1.5 If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Peter McLaughlin, (520) 837-4898 or e-mail Peter.McLaughlin@tucsonaz.gov. |
| 09/15/2008 | JOSE ORTIZ | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Approved | |
| 10/23/2008 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES September 16, 2008 Dan Castro Rick Engineering Company 1745 East River Road, Suite 101 Tucson, Arizona 85718 Subject: S08-101 Tres Pueblos Este Tentative Plat Dear Dan: Your submittal of August 11, 2008 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a DETAILED cover letter explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLACKLINES MUST BE FOLDED 5 Copies Revised Tentative Plat (ADA, Wastewater, DUPD, Engineering, DSD) 3 Copies Revised Landscape Plan (DUPD, Engineering, DSD) 2 Copies Geotechnical Report (Engineering, DSD) 2 Copies Revised Drainage Report (Engineering, DSD) 2 Copies WASH documentation (Engineering, DSD) 2 Copies Title Report (Engineering, DSD) Should you have any questions, please call me at 837-4919. Sincerely, Patricia Gehlen CDRC Manager All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: 322-6956 |
| 10/23/2008 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES ***REVISED*** October 23, 2008 Dan Castro Rick Engineering Company 1745 East River Road, Suite 101 Tucson, Arizona 85718 Subject: S08-101 Tres Pueblos Este Tentative Plat Dear Dan: The above referenced plan has been CONDITIONALLY APPROVED by the Community Design Review Committee, subject to the revisions required on the bluelines per the on-line comments. Please submit the following documents for sign-off: 1 Blueline set of the Plat, Landscape Plan and NPPO. Please include applicable sheets from any other concurrent reviews. 2 CD that contains all of the drainage/hydrology and other reports submitted for the review and approval of this plan. Additional blackline copies will be made from the complete set and distributed to various review agencies for their files. These copies will be ordered from the City's contracted print company and billed to you unless you already have an account at another printing company. Please let us know which printing company you would prefer to use and list them on your attached transmittal form when submitting your bluelines to the CDRC office for sign-off approval. If you are out of town you will need to contact the printing company for pick up or mailing arrangement options. Please note that the final plat must be approved by Mayor and Council and recorded within one year of date of approval of the tentative plat per LUC 4.1.7.3. PLEASE HAVE THE CITY OF TUCSON APPROVAL STAMP PLACED ON EACH SHEET OF THE SUBMITTAL SET, PREFERABLY IN THE LOWER RIGHT HAND CORNER NEAR THE TITLE BLOCK. THE STAMP IS LOCATED AT http://www.tucsonaz.gov/dsd/CDRC___Rezoning/CDRC/CDRC_Stamp/cdrc_stamp.html. BLUELINE SETS THAT DO NOT HAVE THE STAMP WILL BE RETURNED FOR CORRECTION. Should you have any questions, please call me at 791-5608 extension 1179. Sincerely, Patricia Gehlen CDRC Manager All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: 322-6956 tp-approved |