Plan Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Plan Number - S08-085
Review Name: TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 07/03/2008 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 07/07/2008 | JIM EGAN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | |
| 07/09/2008 | RONALD BROWN | ZONING HC SITE | REVIEW | Denied | 9 JULY 2008 S08-085/KIPPES TOWN HOMES REVIEWED BY RON BROWN ACCESSIBLE REVIEW 2006 IBC/ICC 117.1 DENIED: SEE COMMENTS BELOW A. DENOTE GOVERNING ACCESSIBILITY CODE; 2006 IBC/ICC 117.1 FOR PRIVATE PROPERTY, DENOTE RIGHT OF WAY ACCESSIBILITY STANDARDS; COT DOT STANDARDS FOR CURB RAMPS AT DRIVE WAY ENTRANCE FROM STREETS. B. PROVIDE SPOT GRADES THROUGH OUT IDENTIFIED ACCESSIBLE ROUTE TO SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH ICC 117.1, SECTION 403.3 AND DELETE NOTE REFERENCE TO "ACCESSIBLE ROUTE…SLOPES NOT TO EXCEED 1:12". C. SHOW LOCATION OF NEAREST PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION POINT AS PER 2066 IBC, SECTION 1104 AND ICC 117.1, SECTION 402. D. PROVIDE ONE "VAN ACCESSIBLE" ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACE AS PER ICC 117.1, SECTION 502. 1. PROVIDE ACCESSIBLE PARKING SIGN, 7' ABOVE GRADE TO BOTTOM OF SIGN. 2. PROVIDE RAMP ACCESS FROM PARKING SPACE TO SIDEWALK, ACCESSIBLE ROUTE AS PER ICC 117.1, SECTIONS 405 AND 406. E. INSURE COMPLIANCE WITH THE INCLUSIVE HOME DESIGN ORDINANCE NUMBER 10463. F. PROVIDE OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATION ON COVER SHEET AS PER 2006 IBC. G. CURB RAMP SHOWN AT DETAIL 2/C1 DOES NOT COMPLY WITH ICC 117.1, SECTION 406. H. INSURE ACCESSIBILITY TO ALL AMENITIES IN RECREATIONAL AREAS. END OF REVIEW |
| 07/10/2008 | CDRC1 | OTHER AGENCIES | PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS | Approved | CASE: S08-085, KIPPES TOWNHOMES: TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW COMMENT: NO OBJECTIONS OR ADVERSE COMMENTS Vehicle Trip Generation: Daily: 47 PM Peak: 4 Please call if you have questions or need additional information. P.S: Hello, my name is KoSok Chae, new member of PAG. To review your request promptly, please send your distribution to Pima Association of Governments (PAG) ATTN: KoSok Chae Thanks, ------------------------------------------- KoSok Chae, Ph.D. 177 N. Church Ave., Suite 405 Tucson, AZ 85701 520-792-1093 x487 [tel] 520-620-6981 [fax] www.PAGnet.org |
| 07/14/2008 | JOSE ORTIZ | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Approved | |
| 07/16/2008 | FRODRIG2 | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Denied | July 15, 2008 To: NORMAN A. AMY IDC - INTEGRATED DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION Thru: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Manager City of Tucson Development Services Department ___________________________ From: Tom Porter, Sr. CEA (520-740-6579), representing the Pima County Departments of Wastewater Management and Environment Quality Subject: KIPPES TOWN HOMES Tent. Plat - 1st Submittal S08-085 The proposed sewer collection lines for the above-referenced project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use. This project will be tributary to the Roger Road Wastewater Treatment Facility via the Pantano Interceptor. Obtain a letter from the PCWMD's Development Services Section, written within the past 90 days, stating that treatment and conveyance system capacity for the project is available in the downstream public sewerage system and provide a copy of that letter to this office. The required form to request such a letter may be found at: http://www.pima.gov/wwm/forms/docs/CapResponseRequest.pdf. The development plan for this project cannot be approved until a copy of this letter has been received by this office. Sheet 1: Add a General Note that states: THIS PROJECT WILL HAVE ______ EXISTING AND______ PROPOSED WASTEWATER FIXTURE UNIT EQUIVALENTS PER TABLE 13.20.045(E)(1) IN PIMA COUNTY CODE 13.20.045(E). And fill in the blanks with the appropriate values. Sheet 1: Revise General Note #15 to read as follows: THE ON-SITE SANITARY SEWERS WILL BE PRIVATE AND WILL BE CONSTRUCTED, OPERATED AND MAINTAINED ON A PRIVATE BASIS, AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH AN APPROVED OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE PLAN, IF REQUIRED. THE LOCATION AND METHOD OF CONNECTION TO AN EXISTING PUBLIC SANITARY SEWER IS SUBJECT TO REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE PIMA COUNTY WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT. Sheet 2: Show the actual existing public sewer line and sewer line elements in Uhl St. There should be a symbol in the Legend for the existing public sewer line other than just an S. Sheet 2: Show the construction plan # and pipe size for the existing public sewer line in Uhl St.. Also show the IMS #’s with the rim and invert elevations for the existing public manholes shown on plan. Sheet 2: Show the proposed connection to the existing public sewer line for this project. Call out the line as private and include the pipe size/ slope and length of pipe. Sheet 2: Show the proposed private cleanouts on site with the rim and invert elevations. Sheet 2: The minimum size for the private sewer line is 4” therefore remove the callout for 3” sewer to units 7 and 8. This office will require a revised set of bluelines, and a response letter, addressing these comments. Additional comments may be made during the review of these documents. Pima County Code Title 13.20.030.A.2 requires that a wastewater review fee be paid for each submittal of the development plan. The fee for the first submittal is $166 plus $50 per sheet. For the second submittal, the review fee is $50 per sheet. For all subsequent submittals, the review fee is $39 per sheet. The next submittal of this project will be the second (2nd) submittal. A check for the review fee of this submittal in the amount of $100.00 (made out to PIMA COUNTY TREASURER) must accompany the revised set of bluelines and response letter. If the number of sheets changes, please adjust the review fee accordingly. If you have any questions regarding the above-mentioned comments, please contact me. |
| 07/16/2008 | GLENN HICKS | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Approved | DATE: July 14, 2008 TO: DSD_CDRC@ tucsonaz.gov FROM: Glenn Hicks Parks and Recreation 791-4873 ext. 215 Glenn.Hicks@tucsonaz.gov SUBJECT: S08-085 Kippes Townhomes: Tentative Plat Review(7-08-08) No comments. |
| 07/16/2008 | TOM MARTINEZ | OTHER AGENCIES | AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION | Approved | ADOT has NO COMMENT on this Project. -------------------------------------------------------- Confidentiality and Nondisclosure Notice: This email transmission and any attachments are intended for use by the person(s)/entity(ies) named above and may contain confidential/privileged information. Any unauthorized use, disclosure or distribution is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by email, and delete or destroy all copies plus attachments. |
| 07/16/2008 | ED ABRIGO | PIMA COUNTY | ASSESSOR | Approv-Cond | Office of the Pima County Assessor 115 N. Church Ave. Tucson, Arizona 85701 BILL STAPLES ASSESSOR TO: CDRC Office Subdivision Review City of Tucson (FAX# 791-5559) FROM: Gary Ault, Mapping Supervisor Pima County Assessor’s Office Mapping Department DATE: July 14, 2008 RE: Assessor’s Review and Comments Regarding Tentative Plat S08-085 Kippes Townhomes T141517 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * X Plat meets Assessor’s Office requirements. _______ Plat does not meet Assessor’s Office requirements. COMMENTS: Thank you for your submittal. Please make the following additions/corrections by the final plat stage: Add the number of units to the title block; add common areas as well. The lot lines must be solid and second only to the perimeter line in darkness and thickness. Remove striping, hatching and stippling; label private street and recreation areas as common areas. Add the center line to the right of way (South Rincon Peak Dr.) Add the section tie with a dimension and bearing to the point of tie on the subdivision. Please address questions to Brian Sloan, Brian.Sloan@asr.pima.gov NOTE: THE ASSESSOR’S CURRENT INVOLVEMENT IN PROCESSING ITS MANUAL MAPS TO DIGITAL FORMAT IS EXPEDITED GREATLY BY EXCHANGE OF DIGITAL DATA. IN THE COURSE OF RECORDING THIS SUBDIVISION YOUR ASSISTANCE IN PROVIDING THIS OFFICE WITH AN AUTOCAD COPY WOULD BE GREATLY APPRECIATED. THANK YOU FOR ANY DIGITAL DATA PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED. |
| 07/22/2008 | PGEHLEN1 | TUCSON WATER NEW AREA DEVELOPMENT | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 07/24/2008 | ROGER HOWLETT | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Denied | DEPARTMENT OF URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN COMMENTS Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT S08-085 Kippes Townhomes (XXXX) Tentative Plat () Development Plan (XXXX) Landscape Plan () Revised Plan/Plat () Board of Adjustment () Other CROSS REFERENCE: C9-07-29 NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: Pantano East Area Plan GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: COMMENTS DUE BY: 8/1/08 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: () No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment () Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions () RCP Proposal Complies with Plan Policies () See Additional Comments Attached () No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: (XXXX) Resubmittal Required: (XXXX) Tentative Plat () Development Plan () Landscape Plan () Other REVIEWER: drcorral 791-4505 DATE: July 23, 2008 Urban Planning and Design D08-085 Kippes Townhomes This project is subject to rezoning requirements as part of the rezoning approval (C9-07-29); therefore, plans must be in substantial compliance to said conditions: Please list rezoning conditions on the tentative plat. |
| 07/25/2008 | LIZA CASTILLO | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Approved | To Whom It May Concern: SUBJECT: KIPPES TOWNHOMES S08-085 Tucson Electric Power Company has reviewed and approved the development plan submitted July 8, 2008. Alberta Adrian Office Specialist 918-8347 Ofc. 793-7504 Pgr. |
| 07/25/2008 | ANDY STEUART | COT NON-DSD | REAL ESTATE | Denied | Request the following be considered: 1. The 22 parking spaces be identified. 2. The Recreation Areas be identifed as Common Areas. 3. Easements be established for utilities. Request final plat dedicate an easment for any utility within the 8 parcels, Common Areas or private road. |
| 07/29/2008 | ANDY VERA | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Denied | 1. There does not appear to be adequate street frontage space for APC (automated plastic containers) refuse and recycle curbside service. Require a minimum of 14 ft x 4 ft clear service area not within driveway. 2. The preffered collection method for this development is to provide centralized collection/disposal for both refuse and recycle service. Recommend positioning one single enclosure at each end of the hammerhead/turnaround and demonstrate adequate approach (14 ft x 40 ft clear) and maneuverability to position collection vehicle perpendicular to enclosure. Refer to DS 6-01.2.2.A & 6-01.4.0 Position enclosures a minimum of 20 ft from residential use. 3. Include enclosure detail, labeled and fully dimensioned. Please provide corrections on resubmittal. If you have any questions you may contact Andy Vera at (520) 791-5543 ext 1212 or e-mail: Andy.Vera@tucsonaz.gov |
| 07/31/2008 | JASON GREEN | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | DATE: July 31, 2008 SUBJECT: Kippes Townhomes Tentative Plat- Engineering Review TO: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Manager LOCATION: 7830 E Uhl Street, T14S R15E Sec17 Ward 2 REVIEWERS: Jason Green, CFM ACTIVITY: S08-085 SUMMARY: Engineering Division of Development Services Department has received and reviewed the submitted Tentative Plat, Drainage Submittal (not sealed or signed by the engineer of record) and a copy of the Title Report. The Tentative Plat is not approved at this time. The following items need to be addressed: TENTATIVE PLAT: 1) Title 4 Chapter 30 R4-30-304.E.4: Revise the Tentative Plat to provide the expiration date along with the seal for the engineer of record. Per the referenced section; "All original documents should include a notation beneath the seal either written, typed, or electronically generated that provides the day, month, and year of expiration of current registration, as shown in Appendix B. (Effective 3/08/08)." 2) DS Sec.2-03.2.1.D.2: Revise the project location map on Sheet C1 to identify conditions within the square mile shown, such as subdivisions adjacent to the site. Reference recorded subdivision plats by book and page numbers. 3) DS Sec.2-03.2.1.D.3: Revise the project location map on Sheet C1 to clearly label the section corners for the Township, Range and Section reference provided. 4) DS Sec.2-03.2.1.E: Revise the Tentative Plat to include a small index drawing of the site showing the areas represented on each sheet. If the plat contains more than one sheet an index map or a Sheet Index reference is required on the first sheet. 5) DS Sec.2-03.2.1.G.2: Revise the Title Block to reference the number of proposed Units and provide a statement that the project is part of a Residential Cluster Project (RCP). 6) DS Sec.2-03.2.2.B.1: The correct Tentative Plat number (S08-085) may be added to the lower right hand corner of the plans. 7) DS Sec.2-03.2.2.B.7: Revise the Tentative Plat to reference the following special overlay zone that is applicable to this project. Provide a note stating that "the plat is designed to meet the overlay zone criteria for a Residential Cluster Project (RCP), LUC Sec.3.6.1." 8) DS Sec.2-03.2.2.D.1.b. Revise the Tentative Plat and General Note #13 to include the following note: "Total miles of public streets are_ ." If there are no public streets proposed the blank must be filed in with a zero (0). 9) DS Sec.2-03.2.3.A: Revise the Tentative Plat to show all benchmark locations, proposed location of and method of tie to the permanent survey monuments or nearest section corner. All monuments found or set will be described, revise the Tentative Plat to show monuments at all new property corners at the proposed Unit lot lines. 10) DS Sec.2-03.2.3.C: Revise the Tentative Plat to reflect all existing easements with recordation information, location, widths, and purpose. Specifically Items #5 and #7 on Schedule B of the Title Report could not be located on the plans, either clarify the location or add to the Tentative Plat. Blanket easements should be listed in the notes, together with recordation data and their proposed status. 11) DS Sec.2-03.2.3.D: Revise the Tentative Plat to label the recordation data for Uhl Street. 12) DS Sec.2-03.2.4.B: Revise the Tentative Plat to identify each unit/lot with the approximate square footage of each, or a note may be provided stating that all lots comply with the minimum lot size requirements. 13) DS Sec.2-03.2.4.C: Revise the Tentative Plat to clearly label and enclose with a solid line each Common Area that will have separate restrictions or a separate homeowners' association. Specifically the recreation areas. Verify that CC&Rs are submitted and that they provide for maintenance responsibility for all common areas. Or refer to DS Sec.2-03.2.5.I and identify and provide dimensions, square footage and purpose of any lots proposed for dedications based on the recreation area proposed. 14) DS Sec.2-03.2.4.F: Revise the Tentative Plat so that it is designed in accordance with Street Development Standard 3-01.0. Revise the proposed private street to meet the minimum width requirements per Figure 1 "Typical Cross Section for Interior Streets with No on Street Parking" of Supplement #8 within DS Sec.3-01. The minimum right-of-way width for private interior streets with no on street parking is 40-feet. 15) DS Sec.2-03.2.4.F: Revise the Tentative Plat so that the "T" shaped turn around meets the minimum width and setback requirements per DS Sec.3-01, Figure 3. The turn around must be setback a minimum 4-foot from the property line and must provide a minimum 24-foot width. 16) DS Sec.2-03.2.4.F: Revise General Note #21 to correctly label that parking and private streets will be paved with asphalt. PAALs are not acceptable within residential subdivisions. 17) DS Sec.2-03.2.4.J: Provide easements for all utilities (water, electric, private sewer, etc.) with recordation information or provide the description for each utility in respective Common Areas, verify that the CC&Rs match the Common Area descriptions. Easements are to be dimensioned and labeled as to whether they are public or private. 18) DS Sec.2-03.2.4.L: Provide a sealed and signed Drainage Statement from An Arizona Registered Civil Engineer for the project. The Drainage Solution submitted was not signed, sealed or dated. Provide the name and contact information for the civil engineer that prepared the Statement. 19) DS Sec.2-03.2.4.L.2: Revise the Tentative Plat and all landscaping areas to meet the minimum requirements for water-harvesting. Water harvesting areas within the required landscape areas are to be constructed to maximize stormwater run off per Ordinance #10210 The Water Harvesting Guidance Manual dated October 25. Provide a method of collecting onsite drainage to allow stormwater runoff to enter the landscape areas prior to leaving the site to help alleviate off site run off. Provide the location of the curb cuts (or other method) on the Tentative Plat with spot elevations showing that the stormwater run off is directed into these areas. 20) DS Sec.6-01: Provide a letter of approval from Environmental Services for the proposed curbside pick up for the refuse and recycling containers per the note on the Tentative Plat. Refer to Environmental Services for any additional comments. 21) DS Sec.11-01.9: Revise the Tentative Plat to clearly dimension the required 2-feet setback from all property boundaries to the proposed limits of grading, fill slopes, proposed construction, etc. Provide sufficient room to allow for the 2-feet setback from property lines to top of fill slopes and proposed construction. 22) Review and approval from TDOT Permits and Codes for all improvements within the public right-of-way will be required. A right-of-way use permit application and PIA will be required prior to construction. Refer to the following links for TDOT Forms and applications: a) http://www.tucsonaz.gov/dsd/Forms_Fees___Maps/Applications/applications.html / b) http://www.dot.ci.tucson.az.us/engineering/pia.php c) Or contact Thad Harvison at 837-6592 for all additional questions regarding r-o-w. DRAINAGE STATEMENT: 23) DS Sec.10-02.2.3.2: A Drainage Statement may be submitted in lieu of a Drainage Report due to the existing site conditions. An Arizona Registered Professional Civil Engineering must prepare the Statement and can us their judgment on what technical information is provided for review. However in all cases, the Drainage Statement must be clearly written, sealed, and signed by the Engineer of record. GRADING PLAN: 24) DS Sec.2-03.5.2: For future references a grading permit application will be required for this project. A grading permit may not be issued prior to Tentative Plat approval. 25) Please ensure the grading plan is consistent with the Tentative Plat and Drainage Statement. Grading standards may be accessed at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/DevStandsTOC.pdf. GENERAL COMMENTS: Provide a revised Tentative Plat, Drainage Statement, and Environmental Services Approval Letter at re-submittal. The revised Tentative Plat and Drainage Statement must address the comments provided above. Include a comprehensive response letter addressing in detail responses to all of the above comments. Further comments may be generated upon resubmittal of the Tentative Plat and Drainage Statement. If you have any questions, I can be reached at (520) 837-4929. Jason Green, CFM Senior Engineer Associate Engineering Division COT Development Services |
| 07/31/2008 | PETER MCLAUGHLIN | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Within vehicular use areas, one (1) canopy tree is required for each 10 motor vehicle parking spaces and every parking space shall be located within forty (40) feet of the trunk of a canopy tree (as measured from the center of the tree trunk) per LUC 3.7.2.3.A.1.a 2. The landscape border shall be recorded as common area and maintained by the homeowners association (HOA). The subdivision CC&Rs and shall reference the maintenance standards in Sec. 3.7.6. The DSD Director may allow the recording of a public use easement with the subdivision plat in cases where the requirements of this section is the only reason for the creation of an HOA. The public use easement shall require the abutting property owner to install and maintain a landscape border in accordance with the standards in this Division. LUC 3.7.2.4.A.1.c. 3. Add the CDRC subdivision case number (S08-085) along with the rezoning case number (C9-07-29) and any other related case numbers to the lower right hand corner of all sheets of the tentative plat and landscape plan. |
| 08/12/2008 | HEATHER THRALL | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Heather Thrall Senior Planner PROJECT: S08-085 Kippes Townhomes, Residential Cluster Project Tentative Plat, 1st Review TRANSMITTAL DATE: August 6, 2008 DUE DATE: August 1, 2008 COMMENTS: 1. Section 4.1.7.1, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a tentative plat. If, at the end of that time, the tentative plat has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this tentative plat is July 7, 2009. 2. This project was reviewed for compliance with the Land Use Code (LUC) and Development Standards - specifically for content of DS 2-03, tentative plat standards. This project was also reviewed for compliance with rezoning case C9-07-29 (to convert the site to R-2 zoning) and Special Exception 07-26 (to allow an RCP on a site under 5 acres). 3. Per DS 2-03.2.1.D.3 & 4, on location map: A) list adjacent township, range and section numbers B) list recorded subdivisions by book & page next to map and keynote position on map 4. Per DS 2-03.2.1.G.2, in title block: A) list number of proposed lots B) list that the subdivision is a "Residential Cluster Project" 5. Per DS 2-03.2.2.B.1, place subdivision case number S08-085 next to the title block. 6. Per DS 2-03.2.2.B.4, revise general note 4 to read total number of lots as 8, not 1. 7. Per DS 2-03.2.2.B.6, acknowledged a DDO will be sought for each unit/lot with structure not meeting setbacks at balconies at subdivision boundaries. 8. Per DS 2-03.2.2.B.7, provide a statement that" this project will comply with the Residential Cluster Project requirements of LUC 3.6.1." 9. Per DS 2-03.2.4.B, call out lot size and lot number for each lot. 10. Per DS 2-03.2.4.C, label each common area with separate letter designation - including streets and recreation areas. Change title block to list any common areas by letter and their type. Call out the square footage of each common area. 11. Per DS 2-03.2.4.G, regarding streets: A) street does not match cross-section of DS 3-01. Revise. B) street cross sections for the city Development Standards do not allow parking directly off the street. Re-design. C) note that not providing on street parking will affect number of guest parking spaces. D) call out whether Uhl has a parking lane and locate nearest edge of travel lane. If no parking lane, nearest edge of travel lane is edge of pavement. 12. Per DS 2-03.2.4.M, provide typical detail lot layout drawings showing the building setbacks for the following: (see comment 15 as well) A) setback from street pavement edge of Rincon Peak Dr. to building wall of garage and residence (i.e. ensure any jogged walls are shown.). B) setback from street pavement edge of Rincon Peak Dr. at hammer head turn around to side and front building walls of both lots 7 and 8. C) setback from exterior subdivision boundaries to east and west, for residence wall and any porches or balconies. D) provide setback notes on sheet C1 clarifying that subdivision boundary setback at south and east is 20' due to adjacent RX-2 zoning. E) provide setback notes on sheet C1 clarifying that subdivision boundary setback at west side is the greater of 10' or 3/4 of the height of the exterior building wall due to adjacent R-3 zoning. F) provide setback note corrected on sheet C-1 clarifying that RCP developing area setbacks used for Uhl Street to allow setback of the greater of 20' or Height of exterior building wall from nearest edge of travel lane of Uhl. (don't' mix developing and developed area setbacks.) G) for building code requirements - place units 1 and 2 a minimum of 3' setback from north property lines. RESIDENTIAL CLUSTER PROJECT COMMENTS DS 2-10. 13. Per DS 2-10.3.1.C, this is a density bonus per the calculations provided. Please explain which criteria are used to justify the bonus under LUC 3.6.1.4.B and how the increased density criteria are all being met. 14. Per DS 2-10.3.1.D, indicate by note that 25% of the units must be barrier free and indicate which units shall meet that criteria. 15. Per DS 2-10.3.2.D.2, provide elevation drawings of the standard unit and show A) the setbacks to the subdivision boundaries typical for both east and west boundaries B) the heights of the building walls facing each subdivision boundary C) the heights of the wall(s) at street front property line D) the garage and living area above any garage called out on the elevations E) the building heights from grade to the roof, and from roof to top of parapet 16. Per DS 2-10.3.2.D.3, it is noted the widths of the lots are not all the same. Clarify if more than one model unit will be used in the subdivision. Be sure to provide elevation plans for all unit styles. 17. Per DS 2-10.3.2.E, provide CCRs maintaining all common areas. RESIDENTIAL CLUSTER PROJECT COMMENTS LUC 3.6.1. 18. Per LUC 3.6.1.4.B, please declare which density increase option(s) will be utilized and explain how these density increase criteria will be met. 19. Per LUC 3.6.1.4.A.5, please declare how what percentage and which specific units will be barrier free from the right of way sidewalk to the house entry. 20. Per LUC 3.6.1.4.A.6, the drawing shows a 5' block wall surrounding the project. To meet LUC 3.6.1.4.A.6, a 6' tall wall is required. Revise 21. Per LUC 3.6.1.4.A.9, provide a note on the plat stating the following "All mechanical equipment shall be screened from adjacent streets exterior to the project and from adjacent existing residential development. Screening shall be architecturally integrated with the overall design of the RCP." 22. Per LUC 3.6.1.4.A.10, provide a note on the plat stating the following "In every RCP, there shall be no further division of land or resubdivision without the developer or successor in interest furnishing written notice to all property owners of record within the boundaries of the RCP. In no event shall further division of land occur without the written approval of the Mayor & Council." 23. Per LUC 3.6.1.4.D.2.C, staff concurs the plan meets the 300 sq. ft. open area on each lot. Please provide a note" each lot must provide 300 square feet of open area, a minimum of which 100 square feet must be consolidated and meet all criteria of LUC 3.6.1.4.D.2.C." 24. Per LUC 3.6.1.4.D.2.C, please provide a note on the plat that "along interior lot lines a 0 setback between units is provided". 25. Per LUC 3.2.5, staff is seeking determination from zoning administration on the following issues regarding the detached ramada in the common area along Uhl Street. Be advised, further comments on these issues may be forthcoming. A) a detached accessory structure is not allowed on a site by itself, it requires a principal use that is permitted in that zone. B) a detached accessory structure is not allowed in the area between the street front lot line (of the subdivision, which is Uhl) and a principal structure (residence on lot 2). 26. Per LUC 3.6.1.4.F, regarding parking: A) Per DS 3-01.Fig.1, 1 guest parking space to be provided for each lot if on street parking is not provided. The amount of guest parking is insufficient. B) Parking cannot back out into a street, as there is no street cross section within the Development Standards that allows that. Re-design street access/parking. C) provide parking calculation on sheet C1 that indicates 1 guest parking space required for each lot when parking is not provided on street. D) specify type of curbing where accessing garage parking spaces - show on drawing and on detail AA on sheet C2. 27. Per LUC 3.6.1.4.G.2, regarding pedestrian circulation: A) detail AA on sheet C2 shows sidewalk, however, drawing on sheet C1 does not clarify that a sidewalk is provided. RCP standards require sidewalks to connect all lots with pedestrian access to all elements of the development. 28. Per LUC 3.6.1.5. A and B, provide CCRs to ensure HOA maintains common areas. 29. LIST ALL CONDITIONS OF REZONING ON PLAT. 30. PROVIDE SEPARATE RESPONSE LETTER ADVISING HOW ALL CONDITIONS OF REZONING WILL BE MET. 31. LIST ALL CONDITIONS OF SPECIAL EXCEPTION ON PLAT. 32. PROVIDE SEPARATE RESPONSE LETTER ADVISING HOW ALL CONDITIONS OF SPECIAL EXCEPTION CASE WILL BE MET. 33. NOTE, FURTHER COMMENTS ON 29-32 MAY BE FORTHCOMING, DEPENDING UPON THE RESPONSES AND INFORMATION PROVIDED. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call (520) 791-5608. C:\planning\cdrc\tentativeplat\S08-085 kippes townhomes tp.doc RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised tentative plat, CC&R's and additional requested documents. |
| 08/15/2008 | KAY MARKS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Denied | 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 JENNIFER STEPHENS ADDRESSING OFFICIAL PH: 740-6480 FAX #: 740-6370 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: JENNIFER STEPHENS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL SUBJECT: S08-085 KIPPES TOWNHOMES/TENTATIVE PLAT DATE: 8/14/08 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and the following matters must be resolved prior to our approval: Include sections on Location Map. On all title blocks delete address and include “A resubdivision of” in front of Prose. Include lots 1-8 on all Title Blocks. Delete E. from E. UHL Street. Rincon Peak is a duplicate street name. Please submit a list of street names to check for duplication. Also, the suffix needs to be Court or Place. |
| 08/16/2008 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES August 16, 2008 John Millar Planner Designer 4930 S. Mesquite Club Lane Tucson, Arizona 85706 Subject: S08-085 Kippes Townhomes Tentative Plat Dear John: Your submittal of July 8, 2008 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a DETAILED cover letter explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLACKLINES MUST BE FOLDED 10 Copies Revised Tentative Plat (ADA, Wastewater, DUPD, Real Estate, ESD, Landscape, Engineering, Zoning, Addressing, DSD) 5 Copies Revised Landscape Plan (DUPD, Landscape, Engineering, Zoning, DSD) 2 Copies Drainage Statement (Engineering, DSD) Should you have any questions, please call me at 837-4919. Sincerely, Patricia Gehlen CDRC Manager All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: 881-6832 Tp-resubmittal |