Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Plan Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Plan Number - S08-065
Review Name: TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 05/29/2008 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 06/02/2008 | JOSE ORTIZ | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Denied | June 2, 2008 ACTIVITY NUMBER: S08-065 PROJECT NAME: The Enclave at McCormick PROJECT ADDRESS: 3103 N Columbus Bl PROJECT REVIEWER: Jose E. Ortiz PE, Traffic Engineer Resubmittal Required: Traffic Engineering does not recommend approval of the Tentative Plat; therefore a revised Tentative Plat is required for re-submittal. The following items must be revised or added to the plat. 1. Include a response letter with the next submittal that states how all comments have been addressed. 2. A permit or a private improvement agreement will be necessary for any work performed within the Right-of-way. Contact Permits and Codes at (520) 791-5100 for permit information. 3. The access points along Columbus Bl. shall have 25' radius curb returns. (DS 3-01.0 figure 6) 4. Clarify the right of way line work. The plans call out of a private road, but the right of way line work shows the private road being in the public right of way. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-4259 x76730 or Jose.Ortiz@tucsonaz.gov |
| 06/02/2008 | JIM EGAN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Denied | A fire hydrant(s) will be required per IFC Section 508.5.1. No parking signs will be required per IFC Appendix D. |
| 06/03/2008 | RONALD BROWN | ZONING HC SITE | REVIEW | Denied | 3 JUNE 2008 S08-065/THE ENCLAVE AT MCCORMICK PARK REVIEWED BY RON BROWN ACCESSIBLE REVIEW 2006 IBC/ICC 117.1 DENIED: SEE COMMENTS BELOW A. DENOTE GOVERNING ACCESSIBILITY CODE; 2006 IBC/ICC 117.1 FOR PRIVATE PROPERTY, DENOTE RIGHT OF WAY ACCESSIBILITY STANDARDS; COT DOT STANDARDS FOR CURB RAMPS AT DRIVE WAY ENTRANCE FROM STREETS. CHANGE NOTE 9 SHOWN FOR INTERIOR PROPERTY RAMPS TO A NEW REFERENCE NOTE REFLECTING ICC 117.1, SECTIONS 405 AND 406. B. PROVIDE AND IDENTIFY ACCESSIBLE ROUTE THROUGHOUT SITE FROM ALL RESIDENCES TO PUBLIC R.O.W., COMMON POOL AREA AND PARKING FACILITIES AND TO NEAREST PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION POINT AS PER 2066 IBC, SECTION 1104 AND ICC 117.1, SECTION 402. C. PROVIDE ONE "VAN ACCESSIBLE" ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACE IN FRONT OF COMMON AREA AS PER ICC 117.1, SECTION 502. 1. PROVIDE ACCESSIBLE PARKING SIGN, 7' ABOVE GRADE TO BOTTOM OF SIGN. 2. PROVIDE RAMP ACCESS FROM PARKING SPACE TO SIDEWALK, ACCESSIBLE ROUTE AS PER ICC 117.1, SECTIONS 405 AND 406. D. ALL MARKED CROSSING SHALL HAVE DETECTABLE WARNINGS AT THE BOTTOM OF THE CURB RAMPS ON BOTH SIDES AS PER ICC 117.1, SECTION S406.12 AND 705.5 E. PROVIDE LARGE SCALE DETAIL OF ALL TYPES OF INTERIOR CURB AND SIDE WALK RAMPS SHOWING SIZES, DIMENSIONS, ALL SLOPES, DETECTABLE WARNINGS AS REQUIRED AND COMPLYING WITH 2006 IBC, SECTION 1010 AND ICC 117.1, SECTIONS 405 AND 406. F. PROVIDE LARGE SCALE DETAIL OF ALL TYPES OF R.O.W. CURB AND SIDE WALK RAMPS SHOWING SIZES, DIMENSIONS, ALL SLOPES, DETECTABLE WARNINGS AS REQUIRED AND COMPLYING WITH COT DOT STANDARDS 207. G. ALL HOUSING STRUCTURES ARE TO COMPLY WITH THE INCLUSIVE HOME DESIGN ORDINANCE NUMBER 10463. H. PROVIDE OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATION ON COVER SHEET AS PER 2006 IBC. END OF REVIEW |
| 06/09/2008 | TOM MARTINEZ | OTHER AGENCIES | AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION | Approved | ADOT has NO COMMENT on this Project. -------------------------------------------------------- Confidentiality and Nondisclosure Notice: This email transmission and any attachments are intended for use by the person(s)/entity(ies) named above and may contain confidential/privileged information. Any unauthorized use, disclosure or distribution is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by email, and delete or destroy all copies plus attachments. |
| 06/11/2008 | PETER MCLAUGHLIN | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Add the CDRC subdivision case number (S08-065) and any other related case numbers to all sheets of the tentative plat, landscape plan, irrigation plan and native plant preservation plan. 2. Revise the note about the landscape border along Blacklidge Drive to read "Street Landscape Border" rather than "Interior Landscape Border". 3. Whether or not required, screens along a street frontage must be located on the development side of the street landscape border so that they do not obstruct the view of the street landscape border from the street. Walls constructed in a single continuous line shall extend into a street landscape border no more than the actual width of the fence or wall. Where a fence or wall incorporates offsets or similar design features, a screen may extend a maximum of three (3) feet into the street landscape border. Revise the 6-foot wall location to meet code requirements or, if a Board of Adjustment Variance is being sought, once it is approved add the case number, the date of approval what the variance was approved for and any conditions imposed to the tentative plat notes. LUC 3.7.3.2.C.3; DS 2-06.3.6 4. Dimension on the landscape plan the width of that portion of the landscape border which is located within the right-of-way. Street landscape borders shall be located entirely on site except that, if approved by the City Engineer or designee, up to five (5) feet of the required ten (10) foot width be placed within the adjacent right-of-way area. Street landscape borders fronting on local streets may be reduced to a minimum of five (5) feet. Street landscape borders shall be located entirely on site except that, if approved by the City Engineer or designee, up to five (5) feet of the required ten (10) foot width may be placed within the adjacent right-of-way area. LUC 3.7.2.4.A.3 5. Indicate required groundcover and shrubs within the street landscape border along Blacklidge Drive. Fifty (50) percent or more of the area of the street landscape border must be covered with shrubs or vegetative ground cover. The required ground coverage must be achieved within two (2) years from the date of planting. LUC 3.7.2.4.A.5; DS2-06.3.4.D.2 Provide a calculation of coverage for the street landscape border along Blacklidge Drive per DS2-07.2.2.A.2.g 6. Revise the preservation method in general note 9 and in the Overview on sheet N-1 to read the "Plant Inventory Methodology" rather than the "Selective Plant Preservation Method". |
| 06/12/2008 | PGEHLEN1 | TUCSON WATER NEW AREA DEVELOPMENT | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 06/12/2008 | FRODRIG2 | OTHER AGENCIES | PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS | Approved | CASE: S08-065, THE ENCLAVE AT MCCORMICK RANCH: TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW COMMENT: NO OBJECTIONS OR ADVERSE COMMENTS Vehicle Trip Generation: Daily 86 PM Peak: 9 Please call if you have questions or need additional information. ------------------------------------------- KoSok Chae 177 N. Church Ave., Suite 405 Tucson, AZ 85701 520-792-1093 x487 [tel] 520-620-6981 [fax] www.PAGnet.org |
| 06/13/2008 | FRODRIG2 | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Denied | June 11, 2008 To: Daniel White, P.E. Physical Resource Engineering, Inc. Thru: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Manager City of Tucson Development Services Department ___________________________ From: Tom Porter, Sr. CEA (520-740-6579), representing the Pima County Departments of Wastewater Management and Environment Quality Subject: The Enclave at McCormick Ranch RCP, Lots 1-9 and Common Areas A, B, C & D Tent. Plat - 1st Submittal S08-065 The proposed sewer collection lines for the above-referenced project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use. This project will be tributary to the Ina Road Wastewater Treatment Facility via the South Rillito Central,Tucson Blvd Flow Control Structure and North Rillito Interceptor. Obtain a letter from the PCWMD's Development Services Section stating that treatment and conveyance system capacity for the project is available in the downstream public sewerage system and provide a copy of that letter to this office. The required form to request such a letter may be found at: http://www.pima.gov/wwm/forms/docs/CapResponseRequest.pdf. The development plan for this project cannot be approved until a copy of this letter has been received by this office. Sheet 1: Revise General Note #7 to read as follows: THE ON-SITE SANITARY SEWERS WILL BE PRIVATE AND WILL BE CONSTRUCTED, OPERATED AND MAINTAINED ON A PRIVATE BASIS, AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH AN APPROVED OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE PLAN, IF REQUIRED. THE LOCATION AND METHOD OF CONNECTION TO AN EXISTING PUBLIC SANITARY SEWER IS SUBJECT TO REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE PIMA COUNTY WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT. Sheet 3: The proposed on-site collection sewers must be privately maintained by the property owner’s association that will need to be formed. Sheet 3: The proposed point of connection will be unacceptable both to the PCRWRD and the client due to fear of cracking the 21” VCP sewer in Columbus Blvd and the extremely large amount of flow management cost for making such a connection( could easily be $100,000 to $200,000). Sheet 3: The PCRWRD recommends that this property be sewered to the west to existing sewerline G-78-28 by a) Constructing a new public manhole 10’ west of existing 6’ block wall and b)requesting the abandonment of that portion of G-78-28 that lies east of the new public manhole.Meet with Mr. Tim Rowe of PCRWRD to discuss if needed at (520)740-6547. This office will require a revised set of bluelines, and a response letter, addressing these comments. Additional comments may be made during the review of these documents. Pima County Code Title 13.20.030.A.2 requires that a wastewater review fee be paid for each submittal of the development plan. The fee for the first submittal is $166 plus $50 per sheet. For the second submittal, the review fee is $50 per sheet. For all subsequent submittals, the review fee is $39 per sheet. The next submittal of this project will be the second (2nd) submittal. A check for the review fee of this submittal in the amount of $100.00 (made out to PIMA COUNTY TREASURER) must accompany the revised set of bluelines and response letter. If the number of sheets changes, please adjust the review fee accordingly. If you have any questions regarding the above-mentioned comments, please contact me. |
| 06/17/2008 | GLENN HICKS | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Approved | DATE: June 16, 2008 TO: DSD_CDRC@ tucsonaz.gov FROM: Glenn Hicks Parks and Recreation 791-4873 ext. 215 Glenn.Hicks@tucsonaz.gov SUBJECT: S08-065 The Enclave at McCormick Ranch: Tentative Plat Review(5-29-08) Staff has no comments. |
| 06/18/2008 | ANDY VERA | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Approved | 9 residential lots. Adequate street frontage access for APC refuse and recycle curbside collection services. |
| 06/24/2008 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: The Enclave at McCormick Ranch Tentative Plat S08-065 (1st Review) TRANSMITTAL DATE: June 24, 2008 DUE DATE: June 26, 2008 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. Section 4.1.7.1, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a tentative plat. If, at the end of that time, the tentative plat has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this tentative plat is May 28, 2009. 2. There is an open rezoning case C9-05-29, R-1 to R-2. As it appears that the R-1 zoning is to remain in place contact Michael Wynekin, Rezoning Section, 837-4955 in regards to withdrawing this rezoning case. 3. D.S. 2-03.2.1.G Revise the title block to read "Common Areas A (Private Road & Drainage), B (Recreation), C (Landscape), D (Landscape & Public Access)" 4. D.S. 2-03.2.2.B.1 Place the S08-065 subdivision case number in the lower right corner of the plat next to the title block. 5. D.S. 2-03.2.2.B.8 Add a general note listing the gross area of the subdivision. 6. D.S. 2-03.2.4.B Provide the square footage for each lot within the subdivision boundary. 7. D.S. 2-03.2.4.C Common Area "A" is proposed as a private street therefore the east end of the private street, along Columbus Blvd, should have a solid line enclosing the common area. 8. D.S. 2-03.2.4.G The proposed private street with perpendicular parking does not meet any D.S. 3-01 typical street cross section and will require a Development Standard Modification Request (DSMR) prior to approval of the tentative plat. 9. D.S. 2-03.2.4.G The proposed private street cross section shows concrete sidewalks on both sides and the plans have a combination of concrete sidewalk and decomposed granite, please clarify. 10. D.S. 2-03.2.4.G The proposed "VISTOR SPACE 18x8", shown at the northeast corner of LOT 9, does not meet the minimum parallel parking space size of 23x8. 11. D.S. 2-03.2.4.G The proposed "INTERIOR 5' WALKS STABILIZED DECOMPOSED GRANITE" does not meet the requirements of D.S. 2-08.5.1.C. 12. D.S. 2-03.2.4.G Based on the legend there appears to be decomposed granite proposed at the flares of each driveway along the west side of the western street, please clarify. 13. D.S. 2-03.2.4.G For your information the proposed crosswalks, shown at the "T" intersection of the private street, are not required as a continuous pedestrian circulation is provided around the perimeter of the private street. 14. D.S. 2-03.2.4.J If applicable show all proposed easements (utility, sewer, drainage, access, etc.) dimension and label as to their purposes and whether they will be public or private. 15. D.S. 2-03.2.4.M Provide a typical lot setback detail. 16. D.S. 2-03.2.4.M Based on the building heights provided on the plan and the requirement for a perimeter yard of ten (10) feet or three-quarters (3/4) of the building wall height, it does not appear that Lots 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, & 7 meet this requirement. Provide building elevations so that setbacks can be verified. 17. D.S. 2-03.2.4.M Provide street setback dimensions from the proposed buildings on lots 8 & 9 to the edge of travel lane. 18. General Note 13 states that this development is subject to the conditions of the special exception case T07SE00032, list the conditions of the special exception on the plan. 19. As this project is a "Cluster Development With Density Increase" demonstrate on the plan how the requirements of LUC Section 3.6.1.3.B are met. 20. Demonstrate on the plan how the requirements of LUC Section 3.6.1.4.A.2 are met. It does not appear that the twenty-five (25) percent requirement is met. 21. Demonstrate on the plan how the requirements of LUC Section 3.6.1.4.A.5 are met. 22. Demonstrate on the plan how the requirements of LUC Section 3.6.1.4.A.7 are met. Contact Traffic Engineering for requirements. 23. Per LUC Section 3.6.1.4.A.9 provide a note on the plan stating "All mechanical equipment shall be screened from adjacent streets exterior to the project and from adjacent existing residential development. Screening shall be architecturally integrated with the overall design of the RCP." 24. Per LUC Section 3.6.1.4.A.10 provide a note on the plan stating "In no event shall further division of land occur without the written approval of the Mayor and Council." 25. Per LUC Section 3.6.1.4.A.11 the proposed sidewalk located within Common Area "D" along Blacklidge Drive is not allowed to be on the RCP site. A Board of Adjustment for Variance is required. 26. Demonstrate on the plan how the requirements of LUC Section 3.6.1.4.D.2.c are met. 27. Provide a copy of the instrument used to meet the requirements of LUC Section 3.6.1.5 28. Depending on how the above comments are addressed additional comments may be forth coming. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4956. C:\planning\cdrc\tentativeplat\S08-065tp.doc RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised tentative plat, site plan and additional requested documents. |
| 06/24/2008 | KAY MARKS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Approv-Cond | 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 KAY MARKS ADDRESSING OFFICIAL PH: 740-6480 FAX #: 740-6370 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL SUBJECT: S08-065 THE ENCLAVE AT MCCORMICK RANCH/TENTATIVE PLAT DATE: 6/20/08 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and we hereby approve this project. NOTE: Label approved interior street name on Final Plat. ***The Pima County Addressing Section can use digital CAD drawing files when submitted with your final plat Mylar. These CAD files can be submitted through Pima County Addressing. The digital CAD drawing files expedite the addressing and permitting processes when we are able to insert this digital data into the County’s Geographic Information System. Your support is greatly appreciated.*** |
| 06/25/2008 | ROGER HOWLETT | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Denied | DEPARTMENT OF URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN COMMENTS Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT S08-065 The Enclave At McCormick Ranch (XXXX) Tentative Plat () Development Plan () Landscape Plan () Revised Plan/Plat () Board of Adjustment () Other CROSS REFERENCE: SE-07-032 NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: Grant Alvernon Area Plan GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: COMMENTS DUE BY: 06/26/08 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: () No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment () Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions () RCP Proposal Complies with Plan Policies () See Additional Comments Attached () No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: (XXXX) Resubmittal Required: (XXXX) Tentative Plat () Development Plan () Landscape Plan (XXXX) Other – Dimensioned Elevations REVIEWER: drcorral 791-4505 DATE: 6/25/08 Please list the Special Exception (SE) conditions on the tentative plat. 2. Please write case number S08-65 on all sheets of the tentative and landscape plans. Per SE Condition #7, A Homeowner’s Association shall be established to oversee the Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions (CC&Rs) for this subdivision. The CC&R’s are to include provisions for the maintenance of all common areas on the site and will include any other factors which could impact adjacent residentially zoned property Please provide a copy of the CC&R’s Per SE Condition #10, side and rear building facades adjacent to public right-of-way and residentially zoned property will be built with attention to architectural character and detail comparable to the front façade. Please provide dimensioned elevation drawings with proposed colors and materials to showing how this condition will be met. Per SE Condition #11, Lot #1 and #9 will have a height limitation of 22 feet………….Second story portion will be setback toward the interior or the project, creating a step down to one-story where adjacent to one-story development. Rear walls, including second-story portion, will incorporate enhanced architecture comparable to the front façade. Please provide dimensioned elevation drawings with proposed colors and materials to showing how this condition will be met. Per SE Condition #12, Lot #2 and #8 will have a height limitation of 23 feet………….Second story portion will be setback toward the interior or the project, creating a step down to one-story where adjacent to one-story development. Rear walls, including second-story portion, will incorporate enhanced architecture comparable to the front façade. Please provide dimensioned elevation drawings with proposed colors and materials showing how this condition will be met Per SE Condition #14, Lot #5 and #6 will have a height limitation of 25 feet………….Second story portion will be setback toward the interior or the project, creating a step down to one-story where adjacent to one-story development. Rear walls, including second-story portion, will incorporate enhanced architecture comparable to the front façade. Please provide dimensioned elevation drawings with proposed colors and materials showing how this condition will be met 8. Per SE Condition #17, To demonstrate compliance with four-sided architecture requirements and compatibility with surrounding neighborhood dimensioned elevation drawings with proposed colors and materials are to be submitted as a part of the platting process to CDRC. |
| 07/01/2008 | LIZA CASTILLO | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Denied | SUBJECT: The Enclave at McCormick Ranch Lots 1-9 S08-065 Tucson Electric Power Company (TEP) has reviewed the tentative plat dated June 9, 2006. This Company is unable to approve the plat at this time. Pole #61 must be shown. Alberta Adrian Office Specialist 918-8347 Ofc. 793-7504 Pgr. |
| 07/01/2008 | ED ABRIGO | PIMA COUNTY | ASSESSOR | Approv-Cond | Office of the Pima County Assessor 115 N. Church Ave. Tucson, Arizona 85701 BILL STAPLES ASSESSOR TO: CDRC Office Subdivision Review City of Tucson (FAX# 791-5559) FROM: Gary Ault, Mapping Supervisor Pima County Assessor's Office Mapping Department DATE: June 26, 2008 RE: Assessor's Review and Comments Regarding Tentative Plat S08-065 THE ENCLAVE AT MCCORMACK RANCH T131434 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * X Plat meets Assessor's Office requirements. _______ Plat does not meet Assessor's Office requirements. COMMENTS: PLEASE MAKE THE FOLLOWING ADJUSTMENTS BY FINAL PLAT STAGE: 1. ADD DIMS AND BEARINGS FOR ALL LOT LINES. 2. ADD SQUARE FOOTAGE FOR COMMON AREAS. THANK YOU FOR YOUR SUBMITTAL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS PLEASE CALL ROSANNA WERNER AT 740-4390 NOTE: THE ASSESSOR'S CURRENT INVOLVEMENT IN PROCESSING ITS MANUAL MAPS TO DIGITAL FORMAT IS EXPEDITED GREATLY BY EXCHANGE OF DIGITAL DATA. IN THE COURSE OF RECORDING THIS SUBDIVISION YOUR ASSISTANCE IN PROVIDING THIS OFFICE WITH AN AUTOCAD COPY WOULD BE GREATLY APPRECIATED. THANK YOU FOR ANY DIGITAL DATA PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED. ROSANNA WERNER |
| 07/08/2008 | PAUL MACHADO | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | To: Patricia Gehlen DATE: July 8, 2008 CDRC/Zoning Manager SUBJECT: McCormick Ranch, 3103 N. Columbus Blvd Tentative Plat S08-065 (First Review) T13S, R14E, Section 34 RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Tentative Plat and Drainage Report. The Tenative Plat (TP) and Drainage Report (DR) cannot be approved as submitted. Please address the following review comments prior to the next submittal. Tentative Plat: 1. Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the DP. 2. As per the Federal ADA requirements, all wheel chair ramps shall have the truncated domes instead of the standard grooves that are shown on COT SD 207. Aside from the Truncated Domes, all wheel chair ramps shall be constructed in accordance with COT SD 207. 3. Revise the FEMA floodplain limits to match the revised FIRM panel dated 05-23-08. Lots 7 and 8 are no longer in the FEMA floodplain. However, lot 9 will have to adhere to the FEMA floodplain regulations. 4. Re-label all common areas that may be used in a dual and/or single use capacity per D.S. 2-03.6.4.C. For example, a Ret./Det. Basin may also be used as a recreation facility or only as a drainage facility or drainage channel and this must be reflected on the Final Plat. A key note explaining the labels could be used in conjunction with the labels, ie.: Common Area "A" - Streets Common Area "B" - Drainage/Recreation Facilities Common Area "C" - Recreation Facilities Common Area "D" - Drainage Facilities Common Area "E" - Landscaping 5. Please provide property description per D.S. 2-02.2.1.3. 6. Retentions basins cannot "cross" over onto private property (lot1). The basins shall be kept in the designated common areas and not straddle two different common areas. 7. Provide details of the "shallow profile drain" and of the retentions basins including dimensions and sections. 8. Please label lot dimensions and bearings per D.S. 2-02.2.1.5 9. Provide all existing and proposed buildings and structures, including location, size, height, overhangs, canopies, and use per D.S. 2-02.2.1.6. 10. Please label all vehicular, bicycle, pedestrian, and handicapped circulation clearly identified per D.S. 2-02.2.1.12. 11. Fully-dimensioned loading space(s) and maneuvering area(s) per D.S. 2-02.2.1.14. 12. Show the limits of the 100-year floodplain and water surface elevation per D.S. 2-02.2.1.15. 13. Please show dimensioned right-of-way, including any applicable Major Streets and Routes (MS&R) Plan right-of-way per D.S. 2-02.2.1.19. 14. Add the basin(s) maintenance responsibility note per S.M.D.D.F.M. 2.3.1.6 C 1 and 2 to the TP/DP. 15. Dimension from street monument lines to existing and proposed curbs, sidewalks, driveways, and utility lines per D.S. 2-02.2.1.21. 16. Show all fences, walls, or vegetation for screening and sight visibility by type, material, height, location and spacing per D.S. 2-02.2.1.27. 17. Show Tentative plat number (S08-065) on all sheets per D.S. 2-02.2.1.29. 18. Placement of fill in excess of 2' above existing grade at any location in the outer 100' of the developing site is not allowed and/or shall meet the requirements per D.S. 11-01. Please address. 19. A permit or a private improvement agreement will be necessary for any work performed within the Right-of-way. Contact Permits and Codes at (520) 791-5100 for permit information. 20. Please show a typical cross section of the P.A.A.L. or call out the percentage of slopes. Call out the GB at the D/W, if applicable. 21. Please show the proposed roof drainage patterns, 100% of the 10-year flow must be conveyed under the sidewalks including any other site drainage as well. Please provide supporting calculations to demonstrate compliance with D.S. 3-01.4.4. If the location(s) of the roof scuppers have not yet been decided, a general note indicating sidewalk scuppers will be used when the roof scuppers locations have been designed and located will suffice. 22. Add note: "Depress all landscaped areas 6" maximum for water harvesting". 23. "A grading permit and Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plans (SWPPP's) will be required for this project. Submit 2 sets of grading and SWPPP's with text, upon completion and submittal of a grading permit application. A grading permit may not be issued prior to site plan approval. Subsequent comments may be necessary, depending upon the nature and extent of revisions that occur to the plans". Drainage Report: 1. Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the DR. 2. This review was performed for Tentative Plat purposes only. 3. Individual retention basins are not allowed on private property and cannot be used for retention calculations. 4. Retentions basins cannot "cross" over onto private property (lot1). The basins shall be kept in the designated common areas and not straddle two different common areas. 5. The cisterns are assumed to be half full for retention calculation purposes. Only half of the retention values shown in the drainage report can be used for the retention calculations. 6. The 4" PVC drainage pipes used on lots 5 and 6 must discharge onto landscaped areas prior to discharging into the street. 7. Provide details of the "shallow profile drain" and of the retentions basins including dimensions and sections. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 837-4932 or Paul.Machado@ci.tucsonaz.govs Paul P. Machado Senior Engineering Associate City of Tucson/Development Services Department 201 N. Stone Avenue P.O. Box 27210 Tucson, Arizona 85726-7210 (520) 837-4932 office (520) 879-8010 fax C:/3103 N. Columbus Blvd_CDRC |
| 07/08/2008 | ANDY STEUART | COT NON-DSD | REAL ESTATE | Approved | No comment. |
| 07/17/2008 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES July 17, 2008 Daniel White Physical Resource Engineering, Inc. P.O. Box 36985 Tucson, Arizona 85705 Subject: S08-065 The Enclave at McKormich Ranch Tentative Plat Dear Dan: Your submittal of May 29, 2008 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a DETAILED cover letter explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLACKLINES MUST BE FOLDED 10 Copies Revised Tentative Plat (Fire, Traffic, ADA, Landscape, Wastewater, Zoning, DUPD, TEP, Engineering, DSD) 5 Copies Revised Landscape Plan (Landscape, Zoning, DUPD, Engineering, DSD) 2 Copies Revised NPPO Plan (Landscape, DSD) 2 Copies Dimensioned, Color Building Elevations (Zoning, DSD) 2 Copies CC&R's (DUPD, DSD) 2 Copies Revised Drainage Report (Engineering, DSD) Should you have any questions, please call me at 837-4919. Sincerely, Patricia Gehlen CDRC Manager All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: 690-1769 |