Plan Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Plan Number - S08-047
Review Name: TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 04/09/2008 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 04/15/2008 | RONALD BROWN | ZONING HC SITE | REVIEW | Denied | 14 APRIL 2008 S8-047/CAMINO 22 REVIEWED BY RON BROWN ACCESSIBLE REVIEW 2006 IBC/ANSI-117.1 DENIED: SEE COMMENTS BELOW 1. GENERAL COMMENT: A. DENOTE ACCESSIBILITY COMPLIANCE TO 2006 IBC/ICC 117.1 2. SHEET T-1: FIVE ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES REQUIRED FOR 146 REGULAR SPACES. ONE MUST BE VAN ACCESSIBLE. DENOTE SUCH, IBC 2006, SECTION 1106.5. A. SURFACE SLOPES FOR ALL ACCESSIBLE PARKING AREAS TO BE NO GREATER THAN 1:48, 2006 IBC/ICC 117.1, SECTION 502.5 3. SHEET T-2 A. PROVIDE AND IDENTIFY ACCESSIBLE ROUTE THROUGHOUT SITE TO ALL BUILDING ENTRANCES AND EXITS AND PARKING FACILITIES AND TO NEAREST PUBLIC TRANSPORATION POINT AS PER 2006 IBS SECTION 1104 AND ICC 117.1 SECTION 402. B. SHOW LOCATION OF NEAREST PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION DROP OFF POINT. C. WIDTH OF ACCESSIBLE ROUTES TO BE MINIMUM OF 5' WITH OUT 6" CURB. 4. CURB RAMPS AT ALL CONCRETE ACCESS DRIVES FROM 22ND AND CAMINO SECO STREETS ARE TO MEET REQUIREMENTS OF COT DOT DETAILS 207. A. WEST ACCESS DRIVE FROM 22ND STREET, WEST SIDE CURB, DOES NOT APPEAR TO HAVE SUFFICIENT TOP LANDING SPACE, VERIFY AND REVISE ACCORDINGLY 5. CURB RAMPS, SIDE WALK RAMPS AND RAISED MARKED CROSSINGS ARE TO COMPLY WITH 2006 IBC, ICC 117.1, SECTION 405 AND 406. PROVIDE DETECTABLE WARNINGS AS REQUIRED. 6. WESTERLY CURB RAMP AT RAISED MARKED CROSSING NORTH OF WESTERLY 22ND STREET DRIVE APRON HAS NO LANDING. REVISE DESIGN ACCORDINGLY. 7. PROVIDE A RAISED MARKLED CROSSING AT DRIVE ENTRANCE TO PARKING SPACES JUST EAST OF BUILDING 15. 8. VERIFY THAT ALL BUILDING ENTRANCES ARE ACCESSIBLE AS PER 2006 IBC SECTION 1105 AND ICC 117.1, SECTIONS 302 AND 303. SHEET T-3 9. SLOPES OF ASSUMED ACCESSIBLE ROUTES WERE CHECKED BY ASPHALT PAVING SPOT GRADES SHOWN AND MAY NOT BE AN ACCURATE PRESENTATION OF ACTUAL ROUTE SLOPES. VERIFY SUCH AND DENOTE SLOPE COMPLIANCE WITH 2006 IBC SECTION 1010 AND ICC 117.1 SECTIONS 405 AND 406. A. SHOW SLOPE COMPLIANCE AT ALL RAISED MARKED CROSSINGS. SHEETS T-4 AND T-5 10. MARK ALL ACCESSIBLE ROUTE WIDTHS 5' WIDE, NOT INCLUDING 6" CURB. 11. MAXIMUM 1:10 SLOPE FROM ALL CURB RAMP SIDE FLAIRS. END OF REVIEW |
| 04/18/2008 | JIM EGAN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | |
| 04/18/2008 | TOM MARTINEZ | OTHER AGENCIES | AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION | Approved | ADOT has NO COMMENT with this project. -------------------------------------------------------- Confidentiality and Nondisclosure Notice: This email transmission and any attachments are intended for use by the person(s)/entity(ies) named above and may contain confidential/privileged information. Any unauthorized use, disclosure or distribution is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by email, and delete or destroy all copies plus attachments. |
| 04/22/2008 | PGEHLEN1 | TUCSON WATER NEW AREA DEVELOPMENT | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 04/23/2008 | PETER MCLAUGHLIN | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Add the CDRC case number (S08-047) and any related case numbers, including the annexation case number (c9-84-65) to the lower right hand corner of all sheets of the tentative plat, landscape plan, and native plant preservation plan. DS 2-07.2.1.B 2. Revise any lettering, particularly that in the NPPO Mitigation Calculations tables on sheet NPPP-2 and on landscape plan sheet 1 of 5, which does not meet the minimum text size requirement of 12 point (0.12"). 3. One (1) canopy tree must be provided for every thirty-three (33) linear feet of landscape border or fraction therof per LUC 3.7.2.4. If the length of the street landscape border (Bufferyard #3) is 281 feet as stated on landscape plan sheet 1 of 5, a total of 9 canopy trees is required. Revise landscape plan to comply. 4. Revise the landscape border at the corner spandrels where the property line has a radius curve at the corner of 22nd Street and Camino Seco, and at the corner of 21st Street and Camino Seco. A 10-foot landscape border must be maintained at these corners. 5. Along interior lot lines of the site, the required perimeter screens must be located on the property line, unless the screen is provided between the property line and the use and a landscaped area of a minimum width of twenty (20) feet is provided between the screen and the property line. Revise the screen wall location on the east property line to comply. LUC 3.7.3.2.A 6. Revise the landscape plan to indicate the minimum width and square footage of tree planters in vehicular use areas. Planters are to be measured from the inside edge of tree planters. DS 2-07.2.2.A.2.e, LUC 3.7.2.3.A.1.c |
| 04/24/2008 | FRODRIG2 | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Denied | April 23, 2008 To: RICHARD CORDOVA DOWL ENGINEERS Thru: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Manager City of Tucson Development Services Department ___________________________ From: Tom Porter, Sr. CEA (520-740-6579), representing the Pima County Departments of Wastewater Management and Environment Quality Subject: CAMINO SECO & 22ND ST LOTS 1-15 COMMON AREA A Tent. Plat - 1st Submittal S08-047 The proposed sewer collection lines for the above-referenced project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use. Obtain a letter from the PCWMD's Development Services Section, written within the past 90 days, stating that treatment and conveyance system capacity for the project is available in the downstream public sewerage system and provide a copy of that letter to this office. The required form to request such a letter may be found at: http://www.pima.gov/wwm/forms/docs/CapResponseRequest.pdf. The tentative or preliminary plat for this project cannot be approved until a copy of this letter has been received by this office. All Sheets: Show the jurisdiction’s case number, S08-047, in or near the title block of each sheet. This case number should be shown larger and bolder than any associated cross-reference numbers. Sheet 1: Add a General Note that states: ANY RELOCATION, MODIFICATION, ETC., OF THE EXISTING UTILITIES AND/OR PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS REQUIRED BY THIS DEVELOPMENT WILL BE AT NO EXPENSE TO THE PUBLIC. Sheet 1: Revise Sanitary Sewer General Note #1 to read as follows: THE ON-SITE SANITARY SEWERS WILL BE PRIVATE AND WILL BE CONSTRUCTED, OPERATED AND MAINTAINED ON A PRIVATE BASIS, AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH AN APPROVED OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE PLAN, IF REQUIRED. THE LOCATION AND METHOD OF CONNECTION TO AN EXISTING PUBLIC SANITARY SEWER IS SUBJECT TO REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE PIMA COUNTY WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT. Sheet 3: Connect to existing manhole via PC/DOT Std Detail WWM 301 if the on-site sewers will be private. Sheet 3: This project may be served using public sewers provided : Connection to existing public sewer is via a new manhole. All the on-site sewers are in the PAAL’s and all manholes are fully accessible. Appropriate public sewer easements are provided. The units will be sold as condos. Sheet 3: Manholes rather then cleanouts will be required at all points where the projected flows (as calculated per Table 1 Unit Flows of Article 3 of Title 18, Chapter 9 of the AAC) is 3000 gpd or more. Sheet 3: Call out the construction plan # and pipe size for the existing public sewer in 22nd St. This office will require a revised set of bluelines, and a response letter, addressing these comments. Additional comments may be made during the review of these documents. Pima County Code Title 13.20.030.A.2 requires that a wastewater review fee be paid for each submittal of the tentative or preliminary plat. The fee for the first submittal is $166 plus $50 per sheet. For the second submittal, the review fee is $50 per sheet. For all subsequent submittals, the review fee is $39 per sheet. The next submittal of this project will be the second (2nd) submittal. A check for the review fee of this submittal in the amount of $100.00 (made out to PIMA COUNTY TREASURER) must accompany the revised set of bluelines and response letter. If the number of sheets changes, please adjust the review fee accordingly. If you have any questions regarding the above-mentioned comments, please contact me. |
| 04/28/2008 | KAY MARKS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Denied | 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 KAY MARKS ADDRESSING OFFICIAL PH: 740-6480 FAX #: 740-6370 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL SUBJECT: S08-047 CAMINO 22/TENTATIVE PLAT DATE: 4/24/08 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and the following matters must be resolved prior to our approval: Add “Being a resubdivision of the remaining” to all Title Blocks. Delete all street directions. Delete all adjacent tax codes on Final Plat. Change unit letters to numbers. es |
| 04/30/2008 | LIZA CASTILLO | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Approved | 4350 E. Irvington Road, Tucson, AZ 85714 Post Office Box 711, Tucson, AZ 85702 WR#1196690 April 29, 2008 DOWL Engineers Attn Richard Cordova 166 W Alameda Street Tucson, Arizona 85701 Dear Mr. Cordova SUBJECT: CAMINO 22 S08-047 Tucson Electric Power Company has reviewed and approved the development plan submitted April 23, 2008. It appears the plans did not show th location of the existing poles only the path of the overhead power lines. If there is a conflict with the existing poles and the new driveways, the relocation cost will be billable. TEP will need a full set of approved site, electrical load, paving off-site improvements and irrigation plans. Enclosed is a copy of a TEP facilities map showing the approximate location of the existing facilities. Any relocation costs will be billable to the customer. In order to apply for electric service, call the New Construction Department at (520) 918-8300. Submit a final set of plans including approved site, offsite and electrical load plans. Include a CD with the AutoCAD version of the plans. If easements are required, they will be secured by separate instrument. Your final plans should be sent to: Tucson Electric Power Company Attn: Ms. Mary Boice New Business Project Manager P. O. Box 711 (DB-101) Tucson, AZ 85702 520-917-8732 Please call the area Designer Nancy DiMaria at (520) 918-8267, should you have any questions. Sincerely, Henrietta Noriega Office Support Specialist Design/Build lm Enclosures cc: City of Tucson (email) N. DiMaria, Tucson Electric Power |
| 04/30/2008 | FRODRIG2 | OTHER AGENCIES | PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS | Approved | CASE: S08-047, CAMINO 22: TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW COMMENT: NO OBJECTIONS OR ADVERSE COMMENTS Vehicle Trip Generation: Daily: 613 PM Peak: 68 Please call if you have questions or need additional information. ------------------------------------------- KoSok Chae 177 N. Church Ave., Suite 405 Tucson, AZ 85701 520-792-1093 x487 [tel] 520-620-6981 [fax] www.PAGnet.org |
| 05/05/2008 | ROGER HOWLETT | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Approved | DEPARTMENT OF URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN COMMENTS Regarding 06-0012 SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT D08-0024 Park N Shade Rita Ranch 05/02/08 () Tentative Plat (XXXX) Development Plan (XXXX) Landscape Plan () Revised Plan/Plat () Board of Adjustment () Other CROSS REFERENCE: Annexation C9-84-84, Ordinance 6143 NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: Esmond Station GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: COMMENTS DUE BY: 05/01/08 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: () No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment (XXXX) Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions () RCP Proposal Complies with Plan Policies () See Additional Comments Attached () No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: () Resubmittal Required: () Tentative Plat () Development Plan () Landscape Plan () Other REVIEWER: drcorral 791-4505 DATE: April 22, 2008 |
| 05/06/2008 | ANDY STEUART | COT NON-DSD | REAL ESTATE | Approved | No comment. |
| 05/06/2008 | JOSE ORTIZ | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Denied | May 6, 2008 ACTIVITY NUMBER: S08-047 PROJECT NAME: Camino 22 PROJECT ADDRESS: 8751 E 22nd St PROJECT REVIEWER: Jose E. Ortiz PE, Traffic Engineer Resubmittal Required: Traffic Engineering does not recommend approval of the Tentative Plat; therefore a revised Tentative Plat is required for re-submittal. The following items must be revised or added to the plat. 1. Include a response letter with the next submittal that states how all comments have been addressed. 2. The COT Transportation Access Management Guidelines section 4.3 requires a minimum median opening separation of 660' along an arterial roadway such as 22nd Street, therefore the proposed median opening will need to be modified or a written justification will need to be prepared with consideration to the issues listed on page 11 of the COT Transportation Access Management Guidelines section 4.3. 3. The written justification can be incorporated into the submitted TIA. 4. A private improvement agreement (PIA) will be necessary for the proposed work to be performed within the Right-of-way. An approved tentative plat is required prior to applying for a PIA. Contact the PIA Coordinator for additional PIA information at 791-5550 ext. 74937. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-4259 x76730 or Jose.Ortiz@tucsonaz.gov |
| 05/07/2008 | ED ABRIGO | PIMA COUNTY | ASSESSOR | Approv-Cond | Office of the Pima County Assessor 115 N. Church Ave. Tucson, Arizona 85701 BILL STAPLES ASSESSOR TO: CDRC Office Subdivision Review City of Tucson (FAX# 791-5559) FROM: Gary Ault, Mapping Supervisor Pima County Assessor’s Office Mapping Department DATE: May 7, 2008 RE: Assessor’s Review and Comments Regarding Tentative Plat S08-047 CAMINO 22 T141515 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * X Plat meets Assessor’s Office requirements. _______ Plat does not meet Assessor’s Office requirements. COMMENTS: PLEASE MAKE THE FOLLOWING ADJUSTMENTS BY FINAL PLAT STAGE: ADD MILES OF NEW STREETS TO GENERAL NOTES EVEN IF IT’S 0. COMMON AREA IS LISTED AS COMMON AREA “A” IN THE TITLE BLOCK AND SHOULD BE LABELED AS SUCH ON THE PLAT. ADD SQUARE FOOTAGE FOR COMMON AREA. SHOW TIE TO SECTION WITH DIMS AND BEARINGS. THANK YOU FOR YOUR SUBMITTAL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS PLEASE CALL ROSANNA WERNER AT 740-4390 NOTE: THE ASSESSOR’S CURRENT INVOLVEMENT IN PROCESSING ITS MANUAL MAPS TO DIGITAL FORMAT IS EXPEDITED GREATLY BY EXCHANGE OF DIGITAL DATA. IN THE COURSE OF RECORDING THIS SUBDIVISION YOUR ASSISTANCE IN PROVIDING THIS OFFICE WITH AN AUTOCAD COPY WOULD BE GREATLY APPRECIATED. THANK YOU FOR ANY DIGITAL DATA PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED. ROSANNA WERNER |
| 05/07/2008 | GLENN HICKS | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Approved | PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT COMMENTS City of Tucson CDRC – Community Design Review Committee CASE NAME & NUMBER: S08-047, Camino 22: TP Submittal #: 1 COMMENTS DUE: 5/7/08 COMMENTS SENT: 5/7/08 Items reviewed: Tentative Plat and Landscape Plan Related: annexation - Ord. No. 6176 rezoning - County Ord. 1981-234, re: Co99-77-112 land use plan(s) – Pantano East Area Plan Parks and Recreation Department Staff has reviewed this proposal and offers the following comments: APPROVED – No comments. No resubmittal required. REVIEWER: Joanne Hershenhorn DATE: 5/7/08 S:\PARKS_AND_RECREATION_DEPT\REVIEW_COMMENTS\CDRC_Cases\2008_ReviewsS08-047_Camino_22_TP.doc |
| 05/08/2008 | TERRY STEVENS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Terry Stevens Lead Planner PROJECT: S08-047 Camino 22 Tentative Plat TRANSMITTAL: 05/08/2008 DUE DATE: 05/07/08 COMMENTS: 1. Section 4.1.7.1, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a tentative plat. If, at the end of that time, the tentative plat has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this tentative plat is 04/08/09. 2. Revise the title block to read: Tentative Plat / Development Plan. 3. DS 2-03.2.1.G.3 In the title block indicate this is a "resubdivision" of the remaining portion etc. 4. DS 2-03.2.1.B.1 Case number S08-047 has been assigned to this tentative/development plan. Please place this number in the right corner of all sheets of the tentative/development plan, landscape plan, NPPO, and any other associated sheets. 5. DS 2-03.2.1.B.2 Remove the word "proposed" from zoning and land use note #1. 6. DS 2-03.2.1.B.5 In the proposed use note #3 add the "subject to: Sec 3.4.5.8.B" to the Medical Services - Outpatient "29". 7. DS 2-03.2.4.C Label each common area with a separate letter designation. Example: Common Area A. Revise title block to indicate Common Area A. 8. DS 2-03.2.4.E Each phase of this project must comply with Code requirements as a separate entity. Phase 1 does not meet the requirements for pedestrian circulation from all adjacent streets. See DS 2-08.3.1. Provide wheel stop curbing or barriers along phase lines to prevent vehicles from driving onto unimproved portions of the site. See DS 3-05.2.3.C.1. 9. DS 2-03.2.4.I If applicable, please draw all existing easements on the plan along with recordation information, location, width, and purpose. If an easement is no longer in use and scheduled to be vacated or has been abandoned, so indicate. If none exist provide response to reviewer's comments. Also if easements are purposed please draw, dimension and label as to their purpose and whether they will be public or private. If none exist provide response to reviewer's comments. 10. DS 2-05.2.4.D.3 Clearly indicate the width of the PAAL entering from Camino Seco. See comment #8 for requirements along the PAALs for wheel stop curbing or barriers at phase lines. 11. DS 2-05.2.4.F Indicate the location of the future curb and parking lane for 2ist Street. See engineering comments. Required in order to verify setbacks. 12. DS 2-04.2.4.K See comment #8 regarding pedestrian circulation for phase one. Provide a connection for the pedestrian circulation path to all adjacent streets. Missing to 21st Street. Provide pedestrian circulation to all trash refuse areas. See DS 2-08.3.1. 13. DS 2-05.2.4.N Provide the height of the proposed structures. In a note provide the allowed height and the proposed height of all structures. 14. DS 2-05.2.4.O In the Site calculations for the loading zones, revise to show 2 loading zones are required and provided for buildings 1 & 2 and buildings 3 & 4. 15. DS 2-05.2.4.P Provide wheel stops at all parking spaces on the plan which will prevent the vehicles from overhanging the sidewalk and limiting the width to less than the required 4' or provide a minimum width sidewalk of 6'-6". 16. DS 2-05.2.4.Q In the site calculations for the bicycle parking required revise to meet the required 75% class one and 25% class two bicycle parking for Amin. Office use in the phase one calculations. This will require changes being made to phase 2 & 3 calculations for the number of required class one and class two parking spaces. FYI: Medical service outpatient requires 50% class one and 50% class two. 17. If available at this time provide a copy of the CC&Rs for preliminary review, clearly indicating cross parking, cross access and maintenance agreement of common areas. This will be required at time of final plat. 18. DS 2-05.2.4.V Please indicate the location and type of postal service to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements. If mail is to be delivered to an area within a building please state so on the plan. 19. DS 2-05.2.4.W Indicate the locations and types of proposed signs (wall, freestanding, pedestal) to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements and that minimal locational requirements can be met. Also indicate if there are existing billboards on site. Billboards will be required to meet all LUC requirements as stated in LUC Sec. 3.5.4.26. If none exists please state so. 20. Based on changes made to this plan and responses to the above comments additional comments may be forth coming. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Terry Stevens, (520) 837-4961 TLS C:\planning\cdrc\tentativeplat\S08-047tp.doc |
| 05/08/2008 | ANDY VERA | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Include a general note stating " Property owner, or Association, or Management will be responsible for the management and maintenance of the centralized refuse/recycle service and storage areas." Otherwise if each building is responsible for their own then a minimum of one refuse and recycle enclosure will be required for each building. Please clarify. 2. Position gate post to the face of CMU wall to allow a minimum gate opening of 12 ft. Please provide corrections and/or clarification on resubmittal. If you have any questions you may contact Andy Vera at (520) 791-5543 ext 1212 or e-mail: Andy.Vera@tucsonaz.gov |
| 06/11/2008 | JASON GREEN | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | DATE: June 11, 2008 SUBJECT: Camino 22 Tentative Plat- Engineering Review TO: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Manager LOCATION: 8751 E 22nd Street, T14S R15E Sec15 Ward 2 REVIEWERS: Jason Green, CFM ACTIVITY: S08-047 SUMMARY: Engineering Division of Development Services Department has received and reviewed the submitted Tentative Plat, Drainage Statement Submittal No. 1 (DOWL Engineers, 27MAR08) and a copy of the Title Report. The Drainage Report was reviewed for Tentative Plat purposes only. The Tentative Plat is not approved at this time. The following items need to be addressed: TENTATIVE PLAT: 1) DS Sec.2-03.2.1.A: Engineering recommends revising the Tentative Plat and the scale used on Sheet T-1. Per the Development Standards all mapped data must be drawn to a standard engineering scale having no more than 50-feet to the inch. The scale provided does not meet this requirement. 2) DS Sec.2-03.2.1.D.2: Revise the project location map on Sheet T-1 to identify conditions within the square mile shown, such as major watercourses (Robb Wash) and subdivisions adjacent to the site. Reference recorded subdivision plats by book and page numbers. 3) DS Sec.2-03.2.2.B.1: The correct Tentative Plat number (S08-047) may be added to the lower right hand corner of the plans where indicated by "SXX-XXX." 4) DS Sec.2-03.2.2.B.7: Revise the Tentative Plat to include the language shown for the special overlay, Major Streets and Routes (MS&R) Setback Zone, LUC Sec.2.8.3, as a separate general note (Refer to Zoning Note 3 on Sheet T-1). 5) DS Sec.2-03.2.2.D.1.a. Revise the Tentative Plat to provide the following note: "All public roads and drainage improvements within and adjacent to this subdivision shall be constructed in accordance with approved plans. Construction plans shall be submitted to the City Engineer's Office for review and approval." 6) DS Sec.2-03.2.2.D.1.b. Revise the Tentative Plat to provide the following note: "Total miles of public streets are_ "and "Total miles of private streets are_". If there are no streets proposed the blank must be filed in with a zero (0). 7) DS Sec.2-03.2.2.G.2: Per the Development Standards if this note is used and the assured water supply is not within the water service area of the Tucson Water Department a certification letter from the Arizona Department of Water Resources is required at the time of Tentative Plat submittal. Tentative Plat will not be approved until this certification has been received. 8) DS Sec.2-03.2.3.A: Revise the Tentative Plat to show all benchmark locations, proposed location of and method of tie to the permanent survey monuments or nearest section corner. All monuments found or set will be described, revise the Tentative Plat to show a description for all found monuments per the legend. 9) DS Sec.2-03.2.3.C: Revise the Tentative Plat to reflect all existing easements with recordation information, location, widths, and purpose. Specifically Items #5 and #6 on Schedule B of the Title Report could not be located on the plans, either clarify the location or add to the Tentative Plat. Blanket easements should be listed in the notes, together with recordation data and their proposed status. 10) DS Sec.2-03.2.3.D: Revise the Tentative Plat to clearly label the existing center lines of all 3 streets that are adjacent to the property and where the right-of-way dimension were taken from. 11) DS Sec.2-03.2.3.G: Revise the Tentative Plat to provide all referenced improvement plan numbers for all existing storm drainage facilities that are shown on the Tentative Plat. 12) DS Sec.2-03.2.4.A: Revise the Tentative Plat to draw all proposed lot lines with approximate distances and measurements. 13) DS Sec.2-03.2.4.C: Revise the Tentative Plat to clearly enclose with a solid line each Common Area that will have separate restrictions or a separate homeowners' association. Common Area "A" must be clear in plan view on the Tentative Plat for the landscaping (water harvesting areas), parking, and access. Provide a separate letter designation for the proposed retention basin (i.e. Common Area "B"). Verify that CC&Rs are submitted and that they provide for maintenance responsibility for all common areas and private easements. 14) DS Sec.2-03.2.4.E: Revise the Tentative Plat to clarify the proposed phase lines shown on the drawing. Verify that all improvements that are to be constructed with Phase 1 (i.e. access drives and associated curb returns, PAALs and curbing, etc.) are shown within the Phase 1 line. Clarify that all improvements that are to be constructed in phases can stand alone, specifically the refuse container in the middle of the project. The container shows that a portion of it is to be constructed during Phase 1 and the other portion during Phase 3, clarify. 15) DS Sec.2-03.2.4.F: Revise the Tentative Plat so that it is designed in accordance with Street Development Standard 3-01.0. The following items need to be revised or added to the proposed Tentative Plat: a) Revise the Tentative Plat to show the required Sight Visibility triangles (SVT) for the intersections of both Camino Seco (Arterial) and E 22nd Street (Arterial) and Camino Seco (Arterial) and 21st Street (Local) per DS Sec.3-01.5.0. Revise the landscape plan to reflect the sight visibility triangles shown on the Tentative Plat. b) Revise the Tentative Plat and the near side dimension for the SVTs shown at all driveway access points. The correct near side dimension for a PAAL/Drive to an Arterial Road is 345 feet. c) Revise the Tentative Plat to dimension the PAAL/ driveway entry point off of Camino Seco. Provide a dimension that meets the minimum requirements of Chapter 25 of the Tucson Code for driveway/curb cuts widths. d) Verify that the proposed handicap ramps within the right-of-way met the minimum requirements of Detail 207 of the Standard Detail for Public Improvements. Any modifications to this detail will require additional review and approval from TDOT. e) Revise the Tentative Plat and/or the associated details to label and dimension all required street improvements for Camino Seco and 22nd Street. Per the adopted Mayor and Counsel policy all sidewalks along MS&R right-of-ways for arterial and collector streets require 6-foot wide sidewalks. If an existing sidewalk is already constructed along the frontage of Camino Seco and 22nd Street and does not meet the minimum width of 6-feet provide photo documentation showing that the existing sidewalk is in good condition. If the sidewalk is missing in spots or is cracked and buckled a new 6-foot sidewalk will be required. A DSMR will be required for modifying the development standards to allow the existing sidewalk to remain and not constructing a new 6-foot sidewalk along the roadway. The DSMR must be approved prior to Tentative Plat approval. All exhibits and discussion must reflect any changes made by the approved DSMR. Provide a General Note to list the DSMR number, the Development Standard being modified along with the date of DSMR approval. f) Revise the Tentative Plat to verify the required curbing and 5-foot wide sidewalk along the street frontage of 21st Street that is adjacent to the subject property. All new development shall provide curbing and 5-foot wide sidewalk along the entire length of street frontage. Refer to DS Sec.3-01 for all curb and sidewalk requirements. g) Refer to comments from Ron Brown, RA Structural Plans Examiner for all ANSI Standard requirements. 16) DS Sec.3-05.2.2.D: Revise the Tentative Plat to provide dimensions for both proposed back-up spurs that are shown on the plat. Back-up spurs must be constructed per DS Sec.3-05.2.2.D, Figure 2. Label and dimension the back-up spurs as required. 17) DS Sec.3-05.2.3.C: Revise the Tentative Plat to show wheel stop barriers at all locations where parking stalls are adjacent to a pedestrian circulation path, landscape area or next to a wall/fence. 18) DS Sec.2-03.2.4.J: Provide easements for all utilities (water, electric, private sewer, etc.) with recordation information or provide the description for each utility in respective Common Areas, verify that the CC&Rs match the Common Area descriptions. Easements are to be dimensioned and labeled as to whether they are public or private. Revise Water Line Keynote #9 for the water easement and provide separate easements for all other proposed utilities. 19) DS Sec.2-03.2.4.L: Revise the Tentative Plat, in conjunction with the submitted Drainage Statement, to reflect the following information. For additional information regarding drainage standards, see the City of Tucson Standards Manual for Drainage Design and Floodplain Management. a) DS Sec.2-03.2.4.L.1: Provide the ponding limits with water surface elevations for the proposed retention basin. Provide a detail or cross section showing detailed information (basin bottom elevation, top of basin elevation, bottom widths, ponding depth, etc.) of the retention basin. Revise keynote # 18 to include this information or a reference to the required detail, referring to the Drainage Statement does not apply. b) DS Sec.2-03.2.4.L.3: Provide a detailed cross section for all proposed storm drains and drop inlets that are shown on the Development Plan. Verify that all requirements and dimensions from the Drainage Statement have been met. c) DS Sec.2-03.2.4.L.5: Provide verification from the adjacent property owner (City of Tucson Department of Transportation and Real Property) for the proposed off-site drainage solution, specifically the proposed RCP pipes and CB Drop Inlet infrastructure. All drainage improvements must be constructed within the subject property lines. If any infrastructure is proposed off-site approval from property owner is required along with a private easement for maintenance and construction of all improvements. Easement is required prior to Tentative Plat approval. 20) DS Sec.2-03.3.1.G: Provide the letter of certification on Assured Water Supply since the project is not serviced by the City of Tucson Water Department. 21) DS Sec.6-01: Revise the Tentative Plat and Detail #4 to correctly label and dimension the refuse container that meets the minimum requirements of DS Sec.6-01, Figure 3 (i.e. 1% slope for bottom, 3'x3' tubing for the proposed gate, enclosure doors supports, etc). 22) DS Sec.10-02.14.3.2: Provide a note on the Tentative Plat stating that, (a) the owner or owners shall be solely responsible for operation, maintenance, and liability for drainage structures and retention basin; (b) that the owner or owners shall have an Arizona Registered Professional Civil Engineer prepare a certified inspection report for the drainage and retention facilities at lease once each year, and that these regular inspection reports will be on file with the owner for review by City staff, upon written request; (c) that City staff may periodically inspect the drainage and retention facilities to verify that scheduled and unscheduled maintenance activities are being performed adequately; and (d) that the owner or owners agree to reimburse the City for any and all costs associated with the maintaining of the drainage and retention facilities, should the City find the owner or owners deficient in their obligation to adequately operate and maintain their facilities." 23) DS Sec.11-01.9: Revise the Tentative Plat to clearly dimension the required 2-feet setback from all property boundaries to the proposed limits of grading, fill slopes, retention basin, block wall and associated erosion protection. Provide sufficient room to allow for the 2-feet setback from property lines to top of fill slopes and associated erosion protection. 24) Review and approval from TDOT Permits and Codes for all improvements within the public right-of-way will be required. A right-of-way use permit application and PIA will be required prior to construction. Refer to the following links for TDOT Forms and applications: a) http://www.tucsonaz.gov/dsd/Forms_Fees___Maps/Applications/applications.html / b) http://www.dot.ci.tucson.az.us/engineering/pia.php c) Or contact Thad Harvison at 837-6592 for all additional questions regarding r-o-w. DRAINAGE STATEMENT: 25) DS Sec.10-02.2.3.2.D: Revise the Drainage Statement to include hydraulic calculations for the existing catch basin and storm drain within the public right-of-way that the proposed RCP drains into. The calculations must show that the existing storm drain and catch basin are sized to except the flows from the 42" RCP. 26) DS Sec.10-02.2.3.2.E: Revise the Drainage Statement to include hydraulic calculation sheets used in the design of all proposed drainage infrastructure (RCP storm drains, inlets, catch basins, curb cuts, wall openings, rock riprap, etc.). 27) Verify that all proposed drainage improvements shown on the Tentative Plat meet the requirements within the Drainage Statement. Provide all details, dimensions, locations, etc. on the Tentative Plat for the retention basin, curb opening, storm drain system, scuppers, etc. that matches the proposed Drainage Statement. GRADING PLAN: 28) DS Sec.2-03.5.2: For future references a grading permit application will be required for this project. A grading permit may not be issued prior to Tentative Plat approval. 29) Please ensure the grading plan is consistent with the Tentative Plat, Drainage Report, and Geotechnical Report. Grading standards may be accessed at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/DevStandsTOC.pdf. 30) Arizona Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (AZPDES) requirements are applicable to this project. Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plans and text addressing stormwater controls for all areas affected by construction activities related to this development will be required with grading plan submittal. For further information, visit www.adeq.state.az.us/environ/water/permits/stormwater.html. GENERAL COMMENTS: Provide a revised Tentative Plat, Drainage Statement, and Certification Letter at re-submittal. The revised Tentative Plat and Drainage Statement must address the comments provided above. Include a comprehensive response letter addressing in detail responses to all of the above comments. Further comments may be generated upon resubmittal of the Tentative Plat and Drainage Statement. If you have any questions, I can be reached at (520) 837-4929. Jason Green, CFM Senior Engineer Associate Engineering Division COT Development Services |
| 06/12/2008 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES June 12, 2008 Richard Cordova DOWL Engineers 166 West Alameda Street Tucson, Arizona 85701 Subject: S08-047 Camino 22 Tentative Plat Dear Richard: Your submittal of April 9, 2008 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a DETAILED cover letter explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLACKLINES MUST BE FOLDED 9 Copies Revised Tentative Plat (ADA, Landscape, Wastewater, Addressing, Traffic, Zoning, ESD, Engineering, DSD) 4 Copies Revised Landscape Plan (Landscape, Zoning, Engineering, DSD) 2 Copies Revised Drainage Statement (Engineering, DSD) 2 Copies Revised TIA (Traffic, DSD) Should you have any questions, please call me at 837-4919. Sincerely, Patricia Gehlen CDRC Manager All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: 624-0384 Tp-resubmittal |
| 06/12/2008 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | March 29, 2010 Richard Cordova DOWL Engineers 166 West Alameda Street Tucson, Arizona 85701 SUBJECT: CLOSURE OF CDRC FILES Tentative and Final Plat Per Sections 4.1.7.1 & 4.1.7.3, Maximum Review Period The subdivider has one (1) year from the date of tentative plat submittal to obtain approval of the plans. Failure to obtain approval means the review period has expired Case # Case Name DSD Transmittal Date S08-047 Camino 22 April 9, 2008 Please note that this case has been closed and that, in order to continue review of the project, new development plan/tentative plat applications are required which comply with regulations in effect at the time of the new submittals. Thank you for your assistance. Sincerely, Patricia Y. Gehlen CDRC Manager xc: CDRC file S08-047 |