Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Plan Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Plan Number - S08-037
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01/07/2010 | JOSE ORTIZ | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Denied | No PIA is required for this development therefore stop signs with street names need to be call out on the tentative plat and grading plan. Contact Pima County Address for correct block numbers for the street name signs. If needed a contact person can be provided. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 837-6730 or Jose.Ortiz@tucsonaz.gov |
| 01/07/2010 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Approved | See Community planning comments regarding the nature and location of amenities. |
| 01/11/2010 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | COT NON-DSD | TUCSON POLICE DEPARTMENT | Approved | >>> Rebecca Noel 12/30/2009 1:47 PM >>> I have no issues with this request at this time. CSO Becky Noel #37968 Tucson Police Dept 837-7428 |
| 01/11/2010 | PGEHLEN1 | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Denied | 1.) In accordance with 2010 Development standard No.6-01.0, Sec 6-01.5.0 Storage areas out side of residents for APC's shall be screened from view of adjacent properties and public roadways. A concrete pad 4-in x 4-ft. x 6-ft enclosure with an 8-in thick masonry screening wall for both refuse and recycle containers, detailed, labeled, and show on tentative plat. |
| 01/11/2010 | JOHN WILLIAMS | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES January 12, 2010 Jean V. Armstrong Baker & Associates Engineering, Inc. 3561 E. Sunrise Dr. # 225 Tucson, Arizona 85718 Subject: S08-037 Mosaic Court Tentative Plat Dear Jean: Your submittal of March 20, 2008 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a set of 6 DETAILED cover letters explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLACKLINES MUST BE FOLDED 6 Copies Revised Tentative Plat (Wastewater, Engineering, Community Planning, Traffic, Env Svcs, PDSD) 3 Copies Revised Landscape Plan (Engineering, Community Planning, PDSD) 2 Copies Four-sided Architecture Elevations (Community Planning, PDSD) 2 Copies House Color Palette (Community Planning, PDSD,) 2 Copies Photos w/ Architectural detail info (Community Planning, PDSD) Should you have any questions, please call me at 837-4919. Sincerely, John Williams Planning Technician All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: (520) 318-1930 |
| 12/07/2009 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 12/09/2009 | JIM EGAN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | |
| 12/10/2009 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Denied | December 9, 2009 To: Jean Armstrong Baker and Associates Thru: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Manager City of Tucson Development Services Department ___________________________ From: Tom Porter, Sr. CEA (520-740-6579), representing the Pima County Departments of Wastewater Management and Environment Quality Subject: Mosiac Court Lots 1-48 an RCP Project and Common Areas “A”,”B” and “C” Tentative Plat – 2nd Submittal S08-037 The proposed sewer collection lines for the above-referenced project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Regional Wastewater Reclamation Department (RWRD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use. Sheet 2: Almost all of the sewers shown on this sheet are too shallow to be constructed of PVC. 2nd Request. Sheet 2: Parking is not an acceptable use within the public sewer easements. 2nd Request. Sheet 3: Show the existing public sewer running north and south west of the parcel. Call out the size of pipe/construction plan # and IMS#’s for the existing manholes. Also show the public sewer easement with recordation information. Sheet 3: The construction plan # for the existing public sewer line running along Stella Rd has not been shown correctly. This office will require a revised set of bluelines, and a response letter, addressing these comments. Additional comments may be made during the review of these documents. Pima County Code Title 13.20.030.A.2 requires that a wastewater review fee be paid for each submittal of the development plan. The fee for the first submittal is $166 plus $50 per sheet. For the second submittal, the review fee is $50 per sheet. For all subsequent submittals, the review fee is $39 per sheet. The next submittal of this project will be the third(3rd) submittal. A check for the review fee of this submittal in the amount of $78.00 (made out to PIMA COUNTY TREASURER) must accompany the revised set of bluelines and response letter. If the number of sheets changes, please adjust the review fee accordingly. If you have any questions regarding the above-mentioned comments, please contact me. |
| 12/14/2009 | ANDY STEUART | COT NON-DSD | REAL ESTATE | Approved | No comment. Thanks for the title report. |
| 12/17/2009 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 12/18/2009 | JASON GREEN | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | DATE: December 18, 2009 SUBJECT: Mosaic Court Tentative Plat- 2nd Engineering Review TO: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Manager LOCATION: 3315 S Wilmot Road, T14S R15E Sec30 Ward 4 REVIEWERS: Jason Green, CFM ACTIVITY: S08-037 SUMMARY: Engineering Division of Planning & Development Services Department has received and reviewed the revised Tentative Plat, Drainage Report (Baker and Associates Engineering, Inc., 10MAR08) and a copy of the Title Report. The Drainage Report was reviewed for Tentative Plat purposes only. The Tentative Plat is conditionally approved at this time. The following items need to be addressed at Final Mylar submittal: TENTATIVE PLAT: 1) Complied. 2) Complied. 3) Complied. 4) Complied. 5) Complied. 6) Complied. 7) Complied. 8) Complied. 9) Complied. CC&Rs will be required at Final Plat submittal for all common areas and required private streets. 10) Complied. 11) DS Sec.2-03.2.4.F: Revise the Tentative Plat so that it is designed in accordance with Street Development Standard 3-01.0. The following item still needs to be revised on the proposed Tentative Plat prior to Mylar approval: a) Complied. b) Revise the Tentative Plat to show the correct Sight Visibility triangles (SVT), with dimensions for the access points off of Wilmot Road (Arterial) and Stella Avenue (Collector) per DS Sec.3-01.5.0. Revise the landscape plan to reflect the sight visibility triangles shown on the Tentative Plat. The stem side of a SVT is 20-feet also the near and far side dimensions do not match the line of sight matrix per DS Sec.3-01.5.3, revise. 12) Complied. 13) Complied. 14) Complied. 15) Complied. 16) Complied. 17) Acknowledged. All proposed work must remain onsite. Any grading or disturbance on adjacent property will require a temporary construction easement. 18) Acknowledged. DRAINAGE REPORT: 19) Complied. 20) Complied. 21) Complied. GEOTECHICAL REPORT: 22) Complied. GRADING PLAN: 23) DS Sec.11-01.2.1: For future references a grading permit application will be required for this project. A grading permit may not be issued prior to Tentative Plat approval. 24) Please ensure the grading plan is consistent with the Tentative Plat, Drainage Report, and Geotechnical Report. Grading standards may be accessed at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/DevStandsTOC.pdf. 25) Arizona Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (AZPDES) requirements are applicable to this project. Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plans and text addressing stormwater controls for all areas affected by construction activities related to this development will be required with grading plan submittal. For further information, visit www.adeq.state.az.us/environ/water/permits/stormwater.html. GENERAL COMMENTS: Provide the Tentative Plat Mylar with the above correction and the signature of the registrant who prepared the plans at re-submittal for final approval. If you have any questions, I can be reached at (520) 837-4929. Jason Green, CFM Senior Engineer Associate Engineering Division COT Planning & Development Services |
| 12/22/2009 | ROGER HOWLETT | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Denied | PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT S08-037 Mosaic Court 12/18/09 (X) Tentative Plat () Development Plan (X) Landscape Plan () Revised Plan/Plat () Board of Adjustment () Other CROSS REFERENCE: C9-78-63 NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: South Pantano Area Plan GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: NO COMMENTS DUE BY: January 6, 2010 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: () No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment () Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions () RCP Proposal Complies with Plan Policies (X) See Additional Comments Attached () No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: April 18, 2008 (X*) Resubmittal Required: (X) Tentative Plat () Development Plan (X) Landscape Plan () Other REVIEWER: MSP 791-5505 DATE: 12/15/09 Department of Urban Planning and Design Comments S08-037 Mosaic Court Tentative Plat Review December 15, 2009 Staff offers the following comments: Staff requests the following revisions to help verify compliance with the Residential Cluster Project (RCP) requirements. 1. In response to Special Condition # 8, the applicant submitted a "Doucette Homes desert mosaic color scheme," including an example of eight color photos with unidentified buildings and colors. Staff considers the information submitted incomplete and staff is unable to verify RCP compliance of said condition. Staff is requesting a color palette with the house paint colors proposed for the Mosaic Court subdivision. The paint palette information shall include the following; paint manufacture name, a paint palette sample with paint names and paint codes identifying all proposed colors. 2. In response to Special Condition # 8, include four-sided (color) building elevations of all conceptual model designs, including approved models such as Doucette Homes models, if such models are being considered for this subdivision. The colors in the four-sided building elevations shall be coordinated with and identified in the paint palette sample (see previous note #1). 3. In response to Special Condition # 8, please provide four-sided architecture building elevations for all the proposed (conceptual or approved) home models. Building facades at rear and side are to be comparable in design with attention to the architectural character and detail as the front façade, including but not limited to, comparable color palette, rooflines, and materials similar to surrounding residential (or commercial) units. Site and building entry points to be highlighted and accented. Dimensioned elevation drawings shall be submitted as part of the development plan submittal. 4. To determine if proposed architectural features and colors are compatible with adjacent uses, staff requires photos with architectural detail information of adjacent buildings in the area. In response to Special Condition # 8, please revise "Exhibit II.E.2. Views." In addition to the photos provided in the first submittal, include "close-up" photos of buildings intended to be shown in the six (6) photo view sheds. 5. Please revise tentative plat sheet 1 of 4, general note 32. It makes reference to Special Exception condition number 10 and staff believes it is intended to make reference to Special Exception condition number 9. 6. Please revise landscape plan on sheet L-5 of 7. A required RCP amenity (picnic table & BBQ TYP) is shown south of lot 23 in an area which is in conflict with required parking spaces shown on tentative plat sheet 2 of 4. 7. Please revise landscape plan to provide within all the "greencourt easements," landscaping and the "enhanced pedestrian corridor," as required per Special Exception condition 1. In addition provide an enlarged detail of what landscape planting, shrubs, groundcover etc. is included within the "greencourt" and what pedestrian amenities are included within the "enhanced pedestrian corridors." Please show pedestrian sidewalks/paths/enhanced pedestrian corridors connecting to common areas with picnic tables and bbq amenities. The tentative plat is required to be in substantial compliance with the preliminary development plan dated June 19, 2009, and the Design Compatibility Report. |