Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Plan Review Detail
Review Status: Active
Review Details: LOT SPLIT REVIEW
Plan Number - S08-026
Review Name: LOT SPLIT REVIEW
Review Status: Active
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 02/21/2008 | FRODRIG2 | START | PLANS BEING WALKED THRU | Completed | |
| 02/25/2008 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | DSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: Travis Spaulding - Lot Split 9970 E. Millmar Road S08-026 (1st Review, Revised) TRANSMITTAL DATE: March 5, 2008 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with redlines and a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. This site plan was reviewed for compliance with the City of Tucson Development Standards (D.S.) and Land Use Code (LUC). 2. The street setback shown along Millmar Road is not shown correctly. Per LUC 3.2.6.5.A the required setback is twenty (20) feet or one and one-half (1-1/2) the height of the proposed building wall. 3. The setback to the north property line of the proposed south parcel is not shown correctly. Per LUC Section 3.2.6.4 the required setback is twenty (20) feet. 4. The setback to the south property line of the proposed south parcel is not shown correctly. Per LUC Section 3.2.6.4 the required setback is twenty-five (25) feet. 5. Remove all references to lot coverage from the plan as it is not applicable to the RX-1 zone, see LUC Section 3.2.3.1.A, development designator "D". 6. All lettering and dimension shall be the equivalent of twelve (0.12") point or greater in size to facilitate reproduction and photographically reduced (microfilm) for record keeping. There are text strings on the north parcel that do not meet this requirement. 7. Provide the rezoning conditions on Sheet S-1, site plan. 8. Provide a separate letter stating how each rezoning condition has been addressed. 9. Clearly indicate on the plan which parcel is #1 and which parcel is #2 10. The provided legal descriptions do not appear to match what is shown on the plan, please clarify. 11. Show the ten (10) foot wide easement for utilities, "Exhibit A on the plan along with the recordation information. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 791-5608 ext. 1180. C:\planning\site\S08-026.doc RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised site/grading plan and additional requested documents |
| 02/25/2008 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 02/29/2008 | JOSE ORTIZ | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Approved | |
| 03/03/2008 | JASON GREEN | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | DATE: March 3, 2008 SUBJECT: Travis Spaulding- Lot Split TO: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Manager LOCATION: 9970 E Millmar Road, T14S R13E Sec22 Ward 4 REVIEWERS: Jason Green, CFM ACTIVITY: S08-026 SUMMARY: Engineering Division of Development Services Department has received and reviewed the proposed Lot Split, Legal Exhibits, and Hydrology Information (JE Fuller/Hydrology & Geomorphology, 26FEB07). The Lot Split is not approved at this time. Please address the following comments: 1) Revise Sheet S-1 to include the CDRC Case Number (S08-026) that has been assigned to this project in the lower right hand corner of the plan. 2) All lettering and dimension shall be the equivalent of twelve (0.12") point or greater in size to facilitate reproduction and photographically reduced (microfilm) for record keeping. 3) Provide the following information regarding the existing public right of way for Millmar Road: the name (public or private), right-of-way width, recordation data, type and dimensioned width of paving, curbs, curb cuts and sidewalks. 4) Provide the required 1-foot no access easement per rezoning condition #4 on the Lot Split plan. The 1-foot no access easement must be shown along the west side of the existing 50-foot ingress and utility easement on the northern parcel. 5) Revise the Lot Split plan, Sheet S-1, to reflect all information that is required within the Hydrology Report per rezoning condition #10. Refer to comments posted under the Hydrology Report Section. 6) Revise the plan sheet to show the regulatory floodplain limits and erosion hazard setback limits in a surveyable manner per rezoning condition #11. 7) Add the following utility note to Sheet S-1 per the rezoning condition #12: "Any relocation or modification of existing utilities and/or public improvements necessitated by the proposed development will be at no expense to the public." 8) Provide or demonstrate with a revised Hydrology Statement the existence of, the necessary improvements to Millmar Road; particularly those improvements that are necessary to ensure that the developed site has a paved all weather access connection to Harrison Road per rezoning condition #13. 9) Revise Sheet S-1 to provide the rezoning conditions per C9-07-24. Provide a separate letter stating how each rezoning condition has been addressed. 10) Clearly indicate on the plan sheet which parcel is #1 and which parcel is #2. 11) Revise the plan to show the 10-foot wide easement for utilities, Exhibit "A" on the plan along with the recordation information. 12) Provide the stamp for the engineer of record on the plan for all drainage information that is shown (FEMA 100-year floodplain limits, erosion hazard setback limits of the Pantano Wash, etc.). 13) Provide the 100-year water surface elevation for the FEMA 100-year AE floodplain that is adjacent to the house to verify that the lowest finished floor is elevated 1-foot above the 100-year water surface elevation. Verify that the FEMA 100-year floodplain limit that is shown matches the Flood Insurance Rate Map Panel # 2270K. Per the panel overlay it appears that the shown AE floodplain limits do encroach onto the proposed building envelope for the proposed single family residence. 14) Verify and label the 18-feet radii and concrete curbs per City of Tucson Transportation Access Management Guidelines (TAMG), Section 5.5 at the proposed driveway entrance located on Millmar Road. Refer to DS Sec.3-01.3.2.C for street development standards. 15) Revise the plan sheet to verify the minimum 12-foot setback distance that is required between each driveway (proposed and existing). 16) Provide existing topographic contours at intervals not exceeding 2-feet and/or spot elevations as pertinent and Bench Mark based on COT Datum, including City Filed Book and page number. The proposed single family residence can not impede flows for the existing wash shown through the middle of the property. Verify that all flows enter and leave the property with the same hydrologic and hydraulic characteristics. HYDROLOGY STATEMENT: 17) Revise the Lot Split Plan to show the regulatory floodplain limits and erosion hazard setback limits in a surveyable manner per the rezoning condition #11. The engineer of record must stamp Sheet S-1 for all drainage related information that is shown, i.e. 100-year floodplain limits, 100-year water surface elevation, and the erosion hazard setback limit. 18) Verify that the FEMA 100-year floodplain limit that is shown on the proposed Lot Split Plan matches the Flood Insurance Rate Map Panel # 2270K. Per the panel overlay it appears that the shown AE floodplain limits do encroach onto the proposed building envelope for the proposed single family residence, clarify. 19) Revise the Hydrology Statement to provide the calculations that where used to determine the discharge value for the wash that runs through the property. All proposed discharges must include the hydrology calculation sheets per DS Sec.10-02.4.2. 20) Revise the Hydrology Statement to provide the water surface elevation for the FEMA AE floodplain limits adjacent to the upstream end of the proposed single family residence to verify that the lowest finished floor meets the 1-foot free board requirement based on site topography. GENERAL COMMENTS: Provide a revised Lot Split and Hydrology Statement. All corrections must address the comments provided above. Include a comprehensive response letter addressing in detail responses to all of the above comments. Further comments may be generated upon resubmittal of the Lot Split package and Hydrology Statement. For any questions or to schedule a meeting, call me at (520) 837-4929. Jason Green, CFM Senior Engineer Associate Engineering Division Development Services |
| 03/03/2008 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 03/10/2008 | ROGER HOWLETT | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Approved | DEPARTMENT OF URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN COMMENTS Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT S08-026 Spalding Lot Split 03/07/08 () Tentative Plat () Development Plan () Landscape Plan () Revised Plan/Plat () Board of Adjustment (XXXX) Lot Split and Elevations CROSS REFERENCE: C9-07-24 Spalding – Millmar Road NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: South Pantano Area Plan GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: no COMMENTS DUE BY: 03/07/08 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: () No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment (XXXX) Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions () RCP Proposal Complies with Plan Policies () See Additional Comments Attached () No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: (XXXX) Resubmittal Not Required: () Tentative Plat () Development Plan () Landscape Plan () Other REVIEWER: RHowlett 791-4505 DATE: 03/07/08 |
| 03/13/2008 | PGEHLEN1 | BUILDING-RESIDENTIAL | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 03/13/2008 | PGEHLEN1 | COT NON-DSD | REAL ESTATE | Denied | The Easement is out for signature. I will let you know when I receive it and send it for recording. |
| 03/13/2008 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-RECORDATION | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES March 13, 2008 Travis Spalding No address found Tucson, Arizona 857 Subject: S08-026 Spalding Lot Split Dear Travis: Your submittal of February 21, 2008 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a DETAILED cover letter explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLACKLINES MUST BE FOLDED 2 Copies Revised Site Plan (Zoning, Engineering, Real Estate, DSD) 2 Copies Revised Survey Drawing (Zoning, Engineering, Real Estate, DSD) 2 Copies Revised Hydrology Statement (Engineering, DSD) Should you have any questions, please call me at 837-4919. Sincerely, Patricia Gehlen CDRC Manager All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: sent via e-mail. Tp-resubmittal |