Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Plan Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - MINOR SUBD REVIEW
Plan Number - S08-022
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - MINOR SUBD REVIEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 05/16/2008 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 05/28/2008 | PETER MCLAUGHLIN | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Indicate the species of mesquite tree proposed for the ten proposed mitigation trees to be placed in the front yard of each of the five lots. 2. Indicate on the NPP plan (aerial plan and legend) by using two separate symbols, the approximate location of the 10 mitigation mesquite trees and the 2 transplanted mesquite trees. |
| 05/29/2008 | JOSE ORTIZ | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Approved | |
| 06/03/2008 | ANDY STEUART | COT NON-DSD | REAL ESTATE | Denied | -In Beneficiary block, request the name of beneficiary to Stewart Title & Trust of Tucson No. 3666 be provided, per City of Tucson, Development Standard No. 2-03.0 Platting Procedures, Section para. 2-03.6.3.C. -In Dedication block, dedication language needs to be provided, per Section para. 2-03.6.3.B.2.a., concerning dedication of 2' R/W along W. boundary. |
| 06/04/2008 | FRODRIG2 | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Approved | May 29th, 2008 To: Dinkar Gangwal, P.E., Alpha Engineering Thru: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Manager City of Tucson Development Services Department ____________________________________ From: Felipe Ip, Sr. Civil Eng. Assistant (520-740-6706), Development Review Division Pima County Development Services Department Subject: Columbus Village, Lots 1-5, 2nd submittal Final Plat and Site Plan, S08-022 The proposed sewer collection lines for the above-referenced project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Regional Wastewater Reclamation Department (PCRWRD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use. The Pima County Department of Environmental Quality and Regional Wastewater Reclamation Department hereby approve the above referenced submittal of the Final Plat/Site Plan submitted to us on May 15, 2008. Please note the following: Approval of the above referenced submittal does not authorize the construction of public or private sewer collection lines, or water distribution lines. Prior to the construction of such features, a Construction Authorization (Approval To Construct) may need to be obtained from the Pima County Environmental Quality. Also, air quality activity permits must be secured by the developer or prime contractor from the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality before constructing, operating or engaging in an activity which may cause or contribute to air pollution. If you have any questions regarding the above mentioned comments, please do not hesitate to contact me at 520-740-6706. CC: Project file |
| 06/05/2008 | KAY MARKS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Approved | 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 KAY MARKS ADDRESSING OFFICIAL PH: 740-6480 FAX #: 740-6370 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL SUBJECT: S08-022 COLUMBUS VILLAGE/REVISED MINOR SUBDIVISION REVIEW DATE: 6/05/08 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and we hereby approve this project. ***The Pima County Addressing Section can use digital CAD drawing files when submitted with your final plat Mylar. These CAD files can be submitted through Pima County Addressing. The digital CAD drawing files expedite the addressing and permitting processes when we are able to insert this digital data into the County’s Geographic Information System. Your support is greatly appreciated.*** ES |
| 06/06/2008 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: Columbus Village - Minor Subdivision S08-022 Final Plat (2nd Review) TRANSMITTAL DATE: June 6, 2008 DUE DATE: June 16, 2008 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. The following comments are in regards to the submitted final plat: 1. Section 4.1.7.1, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a plat. If, at the end of that time, the plat has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this tentative plat is February 13, 2009. 2. D.S. 2-03.6.1.D Label the section corners on the location map. 3. Show the proposed "1' NO ACCESS EASEMENTS" shown on the plan as "PER FINAL PLAT". 4. Remove all setback lines from the final plat. The following comments are in regards to the submitted site layout grading and utility plan: 1. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.7 There appears to be an 8'-0" setback called out between lots 1 & 2, 2 & 3, and 3 & 4. This setback should be listed as 6' or 2/3 the height of the building wall which ever is greatest. 2. This comment was not addressed. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.7 The building interior street setbacks shown on the plan are incorrect. Per LUC Section 3.2.6.5.B.1, ADT of less than 140 the required setbacks should be shown as 5 feet as measured from the back of existing curb or future curb location or 1/2 H as measured from the back of existing curb or future curb location, or 1 foot as measured from the property line or from the nearest edge of the sidewalk or future sidewalk location. 3. This comment has not been addressed. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.7 The setbacks for any proposed garage/carport should be shown based on LUC Section 3.2.6.5.B.2. Show this on the plan. 4. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.12 The proposed private street does not meet any of the standard cross sections shown in D.S. 3-01.0 and requires a Development Standard Modification Request (DSMR). If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4956 C\planning\cdrc\finaplat\S08-022fp-2nd.doc RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised final plat, and additional requested documents. |
| 06/12/2008 | ED ABRIGO | PIMA COUNTY | ASSESSOR | Approv-Cond | Office of the Pima County Assessor 115 N. Church Ave. Tucson, Arizona 85701 BILL STAPLES ASSESSOR TO: CDRC Office Subdivision Review City of Tucson (FAX# 791-5559) FROM: Gary Ault, Mapping Supervisor Pima County Assessor’s Office Mapping Department DATE: June 12, 2008 RE: Assessor’s Review and Comments Regarding Final Plat S08-022 COLUMBUS VILLAGE * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * X Plat meets Assessor’s Office requirements.**SEE COMMENTS** _______ Plat does not meet Assessor’s Office requirements. COMMENTS: PLEASE MAKE THE FOLLOWING ADJUSTMENTS BEFORE RECORDING: ALL LOT LINES SHOULD BE SOLID. THANK YOU FOR YOUR SUBMITTAL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS PLEASE CALL ROSANNA WERNER AT 740-4390 NOTE: THE ASSESSOR’S CURRENT INVOLVEMENT IN PROCESSING ITS MANUAL MAPS TO DIGITAL FORMAT IS EXPEDITED GREATLY BY EXCHANGE OF DIGITAL DATA. IN THE COURSE OF RECORDING THIS SUBDIVISION YOUR ASSISTANCE IN PROVIDING THIS OFFICE WITH AN AUTOCAD COPY WOULD BE GREATLY APPRECIATED. THANK YOU FOR ANY DIGITAL DATA PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED. ROSANNA WERNER |
| 06/18/2008 | PAUL MACHADO | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 06/19/2008 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-RECORDATION | REVIEW | Needs Review | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES June 19, 2008 Dinkar Gangwal Alpha Engineering, Inc. 117 North 6th Avenue Tucson, Arizona 85701 Subject: S08-022 Columbus Village Final Plat Dear Dinkar: Your submittal of May 19, 2008 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a DETAILED cover letter explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLACKLINES MUST BE FOLDED 5 Copies Revised Final Plat (Landscape, Zoning, Assessor, Real Estate, DSD) 2 Copies NPPO Plan or Application for exception (Landscape, DSD) Should you have any questions, please call me at 837-4919. Sincerely, Patricia Gehlen CDRC Manager All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: 628-1289 fpresubmittal |
| 06/19/2008 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | see comments under needs review. |