Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Plan Number: S08-022
Parcel: Unknown

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: MINOR SUBDIVISION REVIEW

Plan Number - S08-022
Review Name: MINOR SUBDIVISION REVIEW
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
02/13/2008 FERNE RODRIGUEZ START PLANS SUBMITTED Completed
02/25/2008 TOM MARTINEZ OTHER AGENCIES AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION Approved ADOT has NO COMMENT on this project

--------------------------------------------------------


Confidentiality and Nondisclosure Notice: This email transmission and any attachments are intended for use by the person(s)/entity(ies) named above and may contain confidential/privileged information. Any unauthorized use, disclosure or distribution is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by email, and delete or destroy all copies plus attachments.
02/27/2008 LIZA CASTILLO UTILITIES TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER Approved 4350 E. Irvington Road, Tucson, AZ 85714
Post Office Box 711, Tucson, AZ 85702


WR#194096 February 26, 2008

Alpha Engineering Inc.
Attn: Dinkar Gangwal
117 N 6th Avenue
Tucson, Arizona 85701

Dear Mr. Gangwal :

SUBJECT: Columbus Village
S08-022

Tucson Electric Power Company has reviewed and approved the development plan submitted February 14, 2008. It appears that there are no conflicts with the existing facilities within the boundaries of this proposed development

Enclosed is a copy of a TEP facilities map showing the approximate location of the existing facilities. Any relocation costs will be billable to the customer.

In order to apply for electric service, call the New Construction Department at (520) 918-8300. Submit a final set of plans including approved site, electrical load, paving off-site improvements and irrigation plans, if available include a CD with the AutoCAD version of the plans.

If easements are required, they will be secured by separate instrument. Your final plans should be sent to:
Tucson Electric Power Company
Attn: Ms. Mary Boice
New Business Project Manager
P. O. Box 711 (DB-101)
Tucson, AZ 85702
520-917-8732

Should you have any technical questions, please call the area Designer Mike Kaiser at (520) 918-8244.

Sincerely,


Elizabeth Miranda
Office Support Specialist
Design/Build
lm
Enclosures
cc: DSD_CDRC@tucsonaz.gov, City of Tucson (email)
M. Kaiser, Tucson Electric Power
02/27/2008 FRODRIG2 OTHER AGENCIES PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS Approved To Whom it May Concern:



The attached PDF contains the estimated trip generation information for the
project S08-016.



Summary:

CASE: S08-016

COMMENT: NO OBJECTIONS OR ADVERSE COMMENTS




Vehicle Trip Generation: Daily: 29 PM Peak: 3



Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions,



Sincerely,

Sandy





Sandra C. Holland

Senior Statistical/ Research Analyst



Pima Association of Governments

177 N. Church Ave, Suite 405

Tucson AZ 85701



Tel: 520 792 1093 X462

Fax: 520 620 6981
03/05/2008 PETER MCLAUGHLIN LANDSCAPE REVIEW Denied 1. Add the CDRC subdivision case number (S08-022) to all sheets of the plat.

2. Submit NPPO plan or application for exception. If submitting an application for exception, include acceptable documentation, which clearly indicates that the project will not impact Protected Native Plants. Such documentation includes photographs of the site taken from all sides of the property per DS 2-15.2.0.C.
03/05/2008 PGEHLEN1 TUCSON WATER NEW AREA DEVELOPMENT REVIEW Approved
03/06/2008 PAUL MACHADO ENGINEERING REVIEW Denied To: Patricia Gehlen DATE: March 28, 2008
CDRC/Zoning Manager FROM: Paul Machado
Engineering Division
SUBJECT: Columbus Village505 S. Columbus Blvd. FP
Final Plat S08-022 (First Review)
T14S, R14E, Section 15

RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Final Plat.

The Final Plat (FP) cannot be approved as submitted. Please address the following review comments prior to the next submittal.

Final Plat:

1. Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the FP.
2. Submit the Subdivision Improvement Assurances for review. The following items are required in the assurance package if a Third Party Trust Agreement will be used:
" Title Report
" Special Warranty Deed
" Trust Agreement
" Amendment to Trust
" Agreement to Construct
Submit the above documents containing original signatures, copies of the documents and signatures will not be forwarded to the City of Tucson attorney for review.
3. The title block of the plat must match the Subdivision Assurances verbatim.
4. A title block with the following information……………………..per D.S. 2-03.2.1.G.
5. Add applicable zoning, land use and Drainage notes…………….per D.S. 2-03.2.2., D and G. On note 3 of the general notes, list the length of new public street as "0" instead of N/A. Is this an easement or a street?
6. Show all existing conditions………………………………………per D.S. 2-03.2.3.A, B, C, D, E, F, G, H, I and J.
7. Show sight visibility triangles per D.S. 2-02.2.1.10. Future an existing.
8. Complete the case no. S08-022.
9. Add the following notes to the FP per D.S. 2-03.2.4, A, B, I, J.
10. Show a 1' no access esmt. along the west property line of lot 1and in the easement between lots 4 and 5 per D.S. 2-03.6.4.G
11. At least one corner shall be tied by course and distance to the subdivision… per D.S. 2-03.6.5.A.
12. Show all distances as calc'ed or measured… per D.S. 2-03.6.5.C.5.
13. The esmt. shall include pedestrian dedication also. Where will the water meters be placed in the esmt.?
14. Please submit a copy of the subdivision boundary closure calculations.

Drainage Report:
1. The DR has been accepted by engineering.
2. This review was performed for FP purposes only.



If you have any questions, I can be reached at 837-4932 or Paul.Machado@tucsonaz.gov
Paul P. Machado
Senior Engineering Associate
City of Tucson/Development Services Department
201 N. Stone Avenue
P.O. Box 27210
Tucson, Arizona 85726-7210
(520) 837-4932 office
(520) 879-8010 fax
C:/505 S. Columbus Blvd. FP
03/06/2008 STEVE SHIELDS ZONING REVIEW Denied CDRC TRANSMITTAL

TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office
FROM: Steve Shields
Lead Planner

PROJECT: Columbus Village - Minor Subdivision
S08-022
Final Plat

TRANSMITTAL DATE: March 6, 2008

DUE DATE: March 13, 2008

COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed.

The following comments are in regards to the submitted final plat:
1. Section 4.1.7.1, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a plat. If, at the end of that time, the plat has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this tentative plat is February 13, 2009.

2. D.S. 2-03.6.1.C All lettering and dimension shall be the equivalent of twelve (0.12") point or greater in size to facilitate reproduction and photographically reduced (microfilm) for record keeping. Lettering shown on the location map does not meet this requirement.

3. D.S. 2-03.6.1.D The location map shall provide the following information; Label all subdivisions by book and page number; Label the section corners; the location map shall be drawn to scale 3" = 1 mile.

4. D.S. 2-03.6.1.K Place the S08-022 subdivision case number assigned to the plat in the lower right hand corner of the plat next to the title block.

5. D.S. 2-03.6.3.D For your information the current acting City Clerk is "ROGER W. RANDOLPH".

6. Provide the docket and page for all existing easements and show any proposed easements as "PER FINAL PLAT".

7. Provide a general note on the plat stating "A SEPARATE RESIDENTIAL SITE PLAN REVIEW WILL BE REQUIRED FOR EACH INDIVIDUAL LOT".

The following comments are in regards to the submitted site layout grading and utility plan:
1. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.3 Provide the project address on the plan.

2. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.5 Provide lot dimensions and bearings for each individual lot.

3. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.7 The perimeter yard setbacks shown for interior lot lines are incorrect. Per LUC Section 2.3.4.2, Residential Use Group, Sec. 6.3.8; Family Dwelling "G", subject to: Sec. 3.5.7.1.E, .F, .G, and .H and LUC Section 3.2.3.1.A development designator "G" and perimeter yard indicator "AA" and LUC Section 3.2.6.4 the required perimeter yard adjacent to R-1 zoned property is 6' or 2/3 the height of the building wall which ever is greatest. Revised the plan and note to show the required perimeter yard setbacks.

4. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.7 The building interior street setbacks shown on the plan are incorrect. Per LUC Section 3.2.6.5.B.1, ADT of less than 140 the required setbacks should be shown as 5 feet as measured from the back of existing curb or future curb location or 1/2 H as measured from the back of existing curb or future curb location, or 1 foot as measured from the property line or from the nearest edge of the sidewalk or future sidewalk location.

5. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.7 The setbacks for any proposed garage/carport should be shown based on LUC Section 3.2.6.5.B.2. Show this on the plan.

6. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.10 Show the future sight-visibility-triangles (SVT's) on the plan.

7. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.12 The proposed private street does not meet any of the standard cross sections shown in D.S. 3-01.0 and may required a Development Standard Modification Request (DSMR), see engineering comments.

8. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.12 It does not appear that there are sidewalks within the right-of-way (ROW) along Columbus Blvd. If engineering requires sidewalks within the ROW the proposed sidewalk that runs along the proposed private road needs to connect to the sidewalk within the ROW. If no sidewalk is required within the ROW then the sidewalk along the proposed private road must maintain a minimum width of four (4) foot to the property line along Columbus Blvd. It does not appear that the width is maintained at the western end of the sidewalk.

9. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.18 Label Columbus Blvd. as a "MS&R".

10. D.S. 2-02.2.1.A.20 Provide the docket and page for all existing easements.

If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4956

C\planning\cdrc\finaplat\S08-022fp.doc

RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised final plat, and additional requested documents.
03/10/2008 KAY MARKS PIMA COUNTY ADDRESSING Denied 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL
TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207

KAY MARKS
ADDRESSING OFFICIAL
PH: 740-6480
FAX #: 740-6370


TO: CITY PLANNING
FROM: KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL
SUBJECT: S08-022 COLUMBUS VILLAGE/MINOR SUBDIVISION REVIEW
DATE: 3/06/08



The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and the following matters must be resolved prior to our approval:

Include scale on Location Plan.

Delete site address and parcel code.

Delete S from S Columbus Blvd and spell out Boulevard.

Add= to 1” 20 under North arrow.

Change Rincon Estate Book 11, Page 40 to Rincon Estates Book 11, Page 26.



es
03/10/2008 ROGER HOWLETT COT NON-DSD COMMUNITY PLANNING Approved DEPARTMENT OF URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN COMMENTS

Regarding

SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application

CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT

S08-022 Columbus Village Minor Subdivision

() Tentative Plat
() Development Plan
() Landscape Plan
() Revised Plan/Plat
() Board of Adjustment
(XXXX) Other - Final

CROSS REFERENCE:

NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: Alvernon-Broadway

GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE:

COMMENTS DUE BY: 03/13/08

SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:

() No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment
(XXXX) Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions
() RCP Proposal Complies with Plan Policies
() See Additional Comments Attached
() No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on:
() Resubmittal Required:
() Tentative Plat
() Development Plan
() Landscape Plan
() Other

REVIEWER: drcorral 791-4505 DATE: 02/29/08
03/10/2008 JIM EGAN COT NON-DSD FIRE Approved
03/12/2008 FRODRIG2 PIMA COUNTY WASTEWATER Denied March 10th, 2008

To: Dinkar Gangwal, P.E., Alpha Engineering

Thru: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Manager
City of Tucson Development Services Department

____________________________________
From: Felipe Ip, Sr. Civil Eng. Assistant (520-740-6706), Development Review Division
Pima County Development Services Department

Subject: Columbus Village, Lots 1-5, 1st submittal
Final Plat and Site Plan, S08-022

The proposed sewer collection lines for the above-referenced project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Regional Wastewater Reclamation Department (PCRWRD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use.

Provide a letter from the PCRWRD's Development Services Section, written within the past 90 days, stating that treatment and conveyance system capacity for the project is available in the downstream public sewerage system and provide a copy of that letter to this office. The required form to request such a letter may be found at:

http://www.pima.gov/wwm/forms/docs/CapResponseRequest.pdf.

The site plan and the final plat for this project cannot be approved until a copy of this letter has been received by this office.

Add the project number, S08-022, to the title block of the sheet. This number should be shown larger or bolder than any cross-reference numbers.
Site plan: Private sewer needs to tap in at 90-degree to the public sewer and at a public manhole. Revise the plan to extend the proposed 6” private sewer to a proposed PUBLIC manhole on the existing PUBLIC sewer main G-182.
Site Plan: Revise the site plan to indicate method of connection to the existing public sewer line (COT/PC standard detail WWM 303), and call out the rim and invert elevations of the proposed PUBLIC manhole. The crown of the 6” private sewer pipe will need to match the crown of the existing 8” public sewer main G-182.
If you replace the terminal manhole with a private clean-out, there will be no need for review by PDEQ.

Site Plan: Show the public and private sewer lines using different line-types, so that they can readily be distinguished from each other. Also, show and describe examples of these different line-types in the legend.
Legend Block: The line-types and symbols used for sewer elements on the site plan should be consistent with those shown in the Legend.

In the DEDICATION block, 2nd paragraph. Although the City Of Tucson may accept the word PUBLIC, Pima County prefers that you GRANT to THE CITY OF TUCSON, PIMA COUNTY AND ALL UTILITY COMPANIES…
In the DEDICATION block, 3rd paragraph. Although the City Of Tucson may accept that common areas are granted as easements to the PUBLIC, Pima County prefers that these elements be GRANTED AS EASEMENTS TO THE CITY OF TUCSON, PIMA COUNTY AND ALL UTILITY COMPANIES…

Site Plan: Add a General Note so it states:

MAINTENANCE AND OPERATION OF THE PRIVATE SANITARY SEWERS (HCS) TO ITS POINT OF CONNECTION TO THE PUBLIC SEWER IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE PROPERTY OWNER.

Site Plan: Add a General Note that states:

THE ON-SITE SANITARY SEWERS WILL BE PRIVATE AND WILL BE CONSTRUCTED, OPERATED AND MAINTAINED ON A PRIVATE BASIS, AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH AN APPROVED OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE PLAN, IF REQUIRED. THE LOCATION AND METHOD OF CONNECTION TO AN EXISTING PUBLIC SANITARY SEWER IS SUBJECT TO REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE PIMA COUNTY REGIONAL WASTEWATER RECLAMATION DEPARTMENT.

Site Plan: Add a Permitting Note that states:

A PROJECT CONSTRUCTION PERMIT MUST BE SECURED FROM PIMA COUNTY REGIONAL WASTEWATER RECLAMATION DEPARTMENT BEFORE BEGINNING ANY WORK ON THIS PROJECT.

Site Plan: Add a General Note that states:

A PROPERTY OWNERS’ ASSOCIATION WILL BE FORMED TO ACCEPT RESPONSIBILITY AND LIABILITY FOR CONSTRUCTION, MAINTENANCE, OPERATION AND CONTROL OF ALL PRIVATE SEWERS.

Site Plan: Add a General Note that states:

THE REQUIRED OFF-SITE PUBLIC SANITARY SEWER AUGMENTATION WILL BE DESIGNED AND CONSTRUCTED TO PIMA COUNTY REGIONAL WASTEWATER RECLAMATION DEPARTMENT STANDARDS.

Written approval is required from PCRWRD for the construction of the private sewers.
Final Plat: Please fill in the BENEFICIARY information.
Site Plan: Label the 39’ easement as “I/E UTILITY & PRIVATE SEWER EASEMENT BY THIS PLAT”
Site Plan: Revise the plan to show the existing HCS and indicate that it will be abandoned and capped.
Revise the label for the existing 8” sewer main on S Columbus Blvd. so it states EXIST. PUBLIC 8” VCP SEWER MAIN G-182. Revise the plan so it shows the existing PUBLIC manhole downstream from the proposed HCS connection. Label the downstream and upstream manholes as PUBLIC with the manhole IMS numbers 9810-10C and 9810-11C and their invert elevations. Existing public sewer information may be found on the PCRWRD Maps and Records (5th floor) basemaps or on the PCRWRD and PCDOT MapGuide internet websites.
This office will require a revised set of plans, and a response letter, addressing these comments. Additional comments may be made during the review of these documents.

The next submittal of this project will be the 2nd submittal. A check for the review fee of this submittal in the amount of $100.00 (made out to PIMA COUNTY TREASURER) must accompany the revised set of plans and response letter.

If you have any questions regarding the above mentioned comments, please do not hesitate to contact me.

CC: Project file
03/12/2008 ED ABRIGO PIMA COUNTY ASSESSOR Approv-Cond Office of the Pima County Assessor
115 N. Church Ave.
Tucson, Arizona 85701

BILL STAPLES
ASSESSOR




TO: CDRC Office
Subdivision Review
City of Tucson (FAX# 791-5559)

FROM: Gary Ault, Mapping Supervisor
Pima County Assessor’s Office
Mapping Department

DATE: March 12, 2008


RE: Assessor’s Review and Comments Regarding Final Plat
S08-022 Columbus Village T141415

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

X Plat meets Assessor’s Office requirements.
_______ Plat does not meet Assessor’s Office requirements.


COMMENTS: Thank you for your submittal. Please make the perimeter line a solid line before recording this plat.

NOTE: THE ASSESSOR’S CURRENT INVOLVEMENT IN PROCESSING ITS MANUAL MAPS TO DIGITAL FORMAT IS EXPEDITED GREATLY BY EXCHANGE OF DIGITAL DATA. IN THE COURSE OF RECORDING THIS SUBDIVISION YOUR ASSISTANCE IN PROVIDING THIS OFFICE WITH AN AUTOCAD COPY WOULD BE GREATLY APPRECIATED. THANK YOU FOR ANY DIGITAL DATA PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED.






Susan King
03/13/2008 FRODRIG2 COT NON-DSD REAL ESTATE Denied S08-022 Columbus Village: Minor Subdivision Review
-Real Estate denies approval until the following are accomplished:
--Beneficiary information needs to be provided.
--Concerning the 2' dedication for Major Streets and Routes, request annotation showing the 2' along the W. boundary of Subject Plat. Also, language needs to be added concerning the dedication of 2' along Columbus Blvd. Examples of statements for dedication are provided in C.O.T. Development Standard 2-03.6.3.B.
--Request identification of the instrument that established the 5' & 10' offsite easement along the N. boundary of Subject Plat.


Regards,
Andy Steuart
Property Agent
Real Estate Program
City of Tucson
201 N. Stone Ave. 6th Fl.
Tucson, Arizona 85701
(O) 520.837.6715
(F) 520.791.5641
andy.steuart@tucsonaz.gov
03/13/2008 JOSE ORTIZ COT NON-DSD TRAFFIC Denied March 13, 2008
ACTIVITY NUMBER: S08-022
PROJECT NAME: Columbus Village
PROJECT ADDRESS: 505 S Columbus Blvd
PROJECT REVIEWER: Jose E. Ortiz PE, Traffic Engineer

Resubmittal Required: Traffic Engineering does not recommend approval of the Tentative Plat; therefore a revised Tentative Plat is required for re-submittal.

The following items must be revised or added to the plat.

1. Include a response letter with the next submittal that states how all comments have been addressed.

2. A permit or a private improvement agreement will be necessary for any work performed within the Right-of-way. Contact Permits and Codes at (520) 791-5100 for permit information.

3. The existing fire hydrant is in the clear zone. Verify with Permits and Codes where the fire hydrant should be relocateed.


If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-4259 x76730 or Jose.Ortiz@tucsonaz.gov
03/14/2008 GLENN HICKS COT NON-DSD PARKS & RECREATION Approved PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT COMMENTS

City of Tucson CDRC – Community Design Review Committee

CASE NUMBER: S08-022
CASE NAME: Columbus Village, Minor Subdivision
Submittal #: 1

COMMENTS DUE: 3/13/08 COMMENTS SENT: 3/13/08


Items being reviewed: () Tentative or Final Plat
( ) Development Plan
( ) Landscape Plan
( ) Other -

Related: annexation - N/A
rezoning - not a rezoning
CDRC – N/A
Adopted land use plan(s) – Alvernon-Broadway Area Plan

Parks and Recreation Department Staff has reviewed this proposal and offers the following comments:


() APPROVED – No Resubmittal Required.

() No comment
( ) Proposal complies with annexation or rezoning conditions
( ) RCP Proposal; complies with land use plan
( ) Proposal satisfies trails, recreational amenities, and/or parks and open space requirements
( ) No additional comments - complies with comments submitted on:


() NOT APPROVED – Resubmit the following. See attached comments.

() Tentative Plat
() Development Plan
() Landscape Plan
() Other


REVIEWER: Joanne Hershenhorn DATE: 3/13/08


S:\PARKS_AND_RECREATION_DEPT\REVIEW_COMMENTS\CDRC_Cases\2008_ReviewsS08-022_Columbus_Village_Minor_Sub.doc
03/19/2008 ANDY VERA ENV SVCS REVIEW Approved 1. 5 SFR lots....Adequate ingress/egress and turnaround within easement. Sufficient street frontage to provide APC curbside refuse and recycle collection service.
04/04/2008 PATRICIA GEHLEN ZONING-DECISION LETTER REVIEW Denied COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES

April 4, 2008

Dinkar Gangwal
Alpha Engineering, Inc.
117 North 6th Avenue
Tucson, Arizona 85701

Subject: S08-022 Columbus Village Final Plat

Dear Dinkar:

Your submittal of February 14, 2008 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a DETAILED cover letter explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed:

ALL BLACKLINES MUST BE FOLDED

9 Copies Revised Final Plat (Landscape, Engineering, Zoning, Addressing, Assessor, Wastewater, Real Estate, Traffic, DSD)

2 Copies NPPO Plan or Application for exception (Landscape, DSD)






Should you have any questions, please call me at 837-4919.

Sincerely,


Patricia Gehlen
CDRC Manager

All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/

Via fax: 628-1289
fpresubmittal