Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you cannot find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

The login landing page when selecting 'View' is still occurring and is still pending further investigation. 

Plan Review Detail

Plan Number: S07-202
Parcel: Unknown

Address:
9430 E STEFAN RD

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW

Plan Number - S07-202
Review Name: TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
01/03/2008 TOM MARTINEZ OTHER AGENCIES AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION Approved ADOT has NO COMMENT on this project.

--------------------------------------------------------


Confidentiality and Nondisclosure Notice: This email transmission and any attachments are intended for use by the person(s)/entity(ies) named above and may contain confidential/privileged information. Any unauthorized use, disclosure or distribution is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by email, and delete or destroy all copies plus attachments.
01/04/2008 ROGER HOWLETT COT NON-DSD COMMUNITY PLANNING Denied DEPARTMENT OF URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN COMMENTS

Regarding

SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application

CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT

S07-202 Stefan Acres 01/03/07

(XXXX) Tentative Plat
( ) Development Plan
( ) Landscape Plan
( ) Revised Plan/Plat
( ) Board of Adjustment
(XXXX) Other - Plant Preservation

CROSS REFERENCE: C9-07-11

NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: Pantano East Area Plan

GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE:

COMMENTS DUE BY: 01/24/07

SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:

( ) No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment
( ) Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions
( ) RCP Proposal Complies with Plan Policies
( ) See Additional Comments Attached
( ) No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on:
(XXXX) Resubmittal Required:
(XXXX) Tentative Plat
( ) Development Plan
( ) Landscape Plan
( ) Other

REVIEWER: drcorral 791-4505 DATE: 01/04/08

1. Add Tentative Plat Number S07-202 to all sheets.

2. Correct Rezoning Case Number, C9-07-11, should be added to the Native Plant Preservation Plans.

2. Item #1 under the General Notes Section of the Tentative Plat, please correct the Rezoning Case Number from C9-03-22 to C9-07-11.

3. Under the General Notes Section - Rezoning Conditions - Item #6 should be deleted and replaced with the following.

6. Historic or prehistoric features or artifacts discovered during future ground disturbing activities should be reported to the city of Tucson Archaeologist. Pursuant to A.R.S. 41-865 the discovery of human remains and associated objects found on private lands in Arizona must be reported to the Director of Arizona State Museum.

4. Under the General Notes Section - Rezoning Conditions - Item #7 should be deleted.

5. Under the General Notes Section - Rezoning Conditions- Item #8 should be item #7.

6. Under the General Notes Section - Rezoning Conditions- Item #9 should be item #8.

7. Under the General Notes Section - Rezoning Conditions- Item #10 should be item #9.

8. Under the General Notes Section - Rezoning Conditions- Item #11 should be item #10.
01/04/2008 PGEHLEN1 TUCSON WATER NEW AREA DEVELOPMENT REVIEW Denied The request was denied because the parcel lies within the boundaries of another water provider. The denial letter that we send to the developer states "since the parcel is located in another provide's water service area, Tucson Water is legally unable to provide water service and to contact the private water company for service information"; Halcyon Acres Water Company in this case.

An assured water supply fro Halcyon Acres Water Company will be required prior to approval.

Plans do not need to be resubmitted to Tucson Water
01/11/2008 PETER MCLAUGHLIN LANDSCAPE REVIEW Denied 1. Revise the rezoning case number in the lower right hand corner of all sheets and in general note 1 of the tentative plat to be correct (C9-07-11).

2. Add the CDRC subdivision case number (S07-202) to all sheets of the tentative plat, landscape plan and Native Plant Preservation Plan.

3. Revise general note 9 to identify the Plant Inventory Methodology as the selected method of compliance, rather than the selective plant methodology. LUC 3.8.4.1.A

4. Show the limits of grading clearly on the Native Plant Preservation Plan. DS 2-15.3.4.A.1

5. Show the location of temporary holding nursery for plants to be salvaged per DS 2-15.3.5

6. The calculations for saguaros and barrel cactus in the worksheet do not match up with those in the inventory table. Revise to be correct and consistent. Check all other calculations as well.

7. Verify that all saguaros and barrel cactus have been inventoried. The cactus worksheet indicates that only viable saguaros and barrels have been inventoried. Revise as necessary. LUC TABLE 3.8.6-I

Further comments may be necessary.
01/14/2008 CDRC1 OTHER AGENCIES PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS Approved >>> "Aichong Sun" <asun@pagnet.org> 01/14/2008 11:47 AM >>>
CASE: S07-202, STEFAN ACRES: TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW

COMMENT: NO OBJECTIONS OR ADVERSE COMMENTS




Vehicle Trip Generation: Daily: 38 PM Peak: 4

Please call if you have questions,



Aichong Sun

Pima Association of Governments

177 N. Church Ave, #405

Tucson, AZ 85701
01/22/2008 LIZA CASTILLO UTILITIES TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER Approved 4350 E. Irvington Road, Tucson, AZ 85714
Post Office Box 711, Tucson, AZ 85702


WR#1192202 January 15, 2008




Dear Jeffrey Stanley:

SUBJECT: Stefan Acres – 4 Lots
S07-202


Tucson Electric Power Company has reviewed and approved the development plan submitted January 7, 2008 It appears that there are no conflicts with the existing facilities within the boundaries of this proposed development.

Enclosed is a copy of a TEP facilities map showing the approximate location of the existing facilities. All relocation costs will be billable to the customer.

In order to apply for electric service, call the New Construction Department at (520) 918-8300. Submit a final set of plans including approved site, offsite and electrical load plans. Include a CD with the AutoCAD version of the plans. If easements are required, they will be secured by separate instrument. Your final plans should be sent to:

Tucson Electric Power Company
Attn: Ms. Mary Boice
New Business Project Manager
P. O. Box 711 (DB-101)
Tucson, AZ 85702
520-917-8732

Please call the area Designer Nancy DiMaria at (520) 918-8267, should you have any questions.


Sincerely,



Henrietta Noriega
Office Specialist
Design/Build
hn
Enclosures
cc:N. DiMaria
01/24/2008 KAY MARKS PIMA COUNTY ADDRESSING Denied 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL
TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207

KAY MARKS
ADDRESSING OFFICIAL
PH: 740-6480
FAX #: 740-6370


TO: CITY PLANNING
FROM: KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL
SUBJECT: S07-202 STEFAN ACRES/TENTATIVE PLAT
DATE: 1/23/08



The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and the following matters must be resolved prior to our approval:

Delete street directions on Location Plan.

Change Bk 60, Pg 40 to Bk 6, Pg 40 & delete Bk 48, Pg 26 on Location Plan.

Include “A resubdivision of” in front of lot 4 on all title blocks.

Include lots 1-4 on all title blocks.

Label on streets on pgs. 1 & 2.


es
01/25/2008 ANDY VERA ENV SVCS REVIEW Denied 1. No provisions shown or mentioned for on site refuse and recycle storage and collection. DS 6-01.4.1.A.

Proposed adult care services will require to provide for onsite refuse and recycle enclosures to support development disposal needs. Include enclosure details.

Please provide corrections on resubmittal.

If you have any questions you may contact Andy Vera at (520) 791-5543 ext 1212 or e-mail: Andy.Vera@tucsonaz.gov
01/28/2008 FRODRIG2 COT NON-DSD REAL ESTATE Denied S07-202 Stefan Acres: Tentative Plat Review
-Concerning the annotated 20' wide utility easement along the W. boundary & along the boundary between Lots 3 & 4, request confirmation if it is private or public. Also, request confirmation if Dkt./Pg. 353/321 provides the easement for the existing water main.
-Request a provision (i.e. easement) be provided concerning the vehicle access corridor for Lots 1-4. This may be accomplished by final plat.
-Request confirmation concerning a void between the S. boundary of Stefan Rd. the N. boundary of Lot 4. This is not shown on Record of Survey, Bk 52 Pg 40.
01/28/2008 JOSE ORTIZ COT NON-DSD TRAFFIC Denied January 28, 2008
ACTIVITY NUMBER: S07-202
PROJECT NAME: Stefan Acres
PROJECT ADDRESS: 9430 E Stefan Rd
PROJECT REVIEWER: Jose E. Ortiz PE, Traffic Engineer

Resubmittal Required: Traffic Engineering does not recommend approval of the Tentative Plat; therefore a revised Tentative Plat is required for re-submittal.

The following items must be revised or added to the plat.

1. Include a response letter with the next submittal that states how all comments have been addressed.

2. Show and label the sight visibility triangles SVTs (DS 2-03.2.4.M).

3. Harrison Road adjacent to this site has a new curb-line due to a recent widening project. If an apron was provided for this site along Harrison Road then access may be warranted off of Harrison. If no access exist then Traffic Engineering recommends that access to this proposed development come off of Stefan Road.

4. A permit or a private improvement agreement will be necessary for any work performed within the Right-of-way. Contact Permits and Codes at (520) 791-5100 for permit information.

5. The access points shall have 25' radius curb returns along Harrison Road. (DS 3-01.0 figure 6)


If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-4259 x76730 or Jose.Ortiz@tucsonaz.gov
01/29/2008 HEATHER THRALL ZONING REVIEW Denied CDRC TRANSMITTAL

TO: Development Services Department
Plans Coordination Office

FROM: Heather Thrall
Senior Planner

PROJECT: S07-202, Stefan Acres (9430 E. Stefan Rd.)
1 lot into 4 lots (Rezoning from SR to RX-1, C9-07-11)
Tentative Plat, 1st review

TRANSMITTAL DATE: January 28, 2008

DUE DATE: January 24, 2008

COMMENTS:

1. Section 4.1.7.1, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a tentative plat. If, at the end of that time, the tentative plat has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this tentative plat is December 23, 2008.

2. This project was reviewed for compliance with the Land Use Code (LUC), Development Standards (DS), American National Standard Institute (ANSI) and International Building Code 2006 (IBC). In addition, this project was reviewed for content required under the tentative plat process outlined in DS 2-03.

3. Per DS 2-03.2.1.G.2, in the title block, call out the number of proposed lots as 4

4. Per DS 2-03.2.1.G.3, this project is a resubdivision of Lot 4 of Halcyon Acres - please see Engineering comments on how to present this information on the plan and in the title block.

5. Per DS 2-03.2.2.A.1, please list the full mailing address of the owner/developer (Tucson, AZ with zip code).

6. Per DS 2-03.2.2.B.1, please add case number "S07-202" near the title block.

7. Per DS 2-03.2.2.B.3., in note 1, change the rezoning case referenced to read C9-07-11.

8. Per DS 2-03.2.2.B.3, revise rezoning notes to read exactly the conditions listed in the July 3, 2007 memo - re: conditions 6 & 7 listed.

9. Per DS 2-03.2.2.B.5, next to the proposed uses listed as adult care homes, provide the following note, "Per Rezoning Case C9-07-11, each lot must operate independently."

10. Per DS 2-03.2.2.B.7, Major Streets and Routes overlay LUC 2.8.3 applies for this project. Please list as a note.

11. Per DS 2-03.2.3.H, please ensure all structures that will be either remaining (solid line) or removed (dashed line) are shown on the plan. The aerial photos from 2005 and oblique photos from this time frame show other detached accessory structures on the site.

12. Per DS 2-03.2.4.D, please correct zoning classification to the south of lot 4 to read SR zoning, not RX-1 zoning - per COT maps.

13. Per DS 2-03.2.4.J, Access/easements:
A) please show any/all easements with information as to what type they are - access, etc. on sheet 1 as well.
B) Please note that per access requirements of the LUC Sec. 3.2.8, and Zoning Administrator advisement, no more than 2 lots and or 2 units can be accessed off the same point without requiring a street.
C) It appears the access serves for 4 lots, which must be changed - or a street is required. See DS 3-01 for street criteria if this is the intention.
D) In addition, it appears that the easement provided for access - being only 15' wide, is not sufficient room to allow a car to maneuver out of the proposed parking areas - without entering adjacent properties - ensure car has 24' to maneuver behind it.

14. Per conversation with Engineer of Record, Jeff Stanley, on 01/28/2008 - the tentative plat is not intended to show a consolidated development, each lot is to function separately, per code. In addition, the development is not intended to provide an actual street-nor a need for a street - thus, separate access points for no more than two lots is possible and the plans shall be revised to show as such. The limit of two lots with the same access point is also shown per the Preliminary Development Plan as well.

Staff noted the following elements that need to be addressed on sheet 2, the development page.

15. Per LUC 3.2.5.1.A, a detached accessory structure cannot be on a lot by itself - it has to be secondary to a principal structure. Please show the storage structure on lot 2 as being removed.

16. Per LUC 2.3.2., setbacks:
A) a 20' setback is required from the existing building wall of the garage to the proposed lot lines adjacent to it. Either reconfigure lot lines, or a method to obtain the written approval of the property owners to keep a reduced building setback must be sought. Contact me on that issue.
B) A 20' building setback must be provided from the proposed building wall to the new property lines. Note that the setback can be averaged. Show the following on the plan - the full length of the walls adjacent to the lot lines, the midpoint of the length of the wall is called out, the distance from each end of the walls and the midpoint of the wall to the adjacent lot lines - and the midpoint meets the setback. The closest end of the wall cannot be less than half the required minimum setback. See diagram LUC 3.2.6.3. for assistance. Staff will verify setbacks are met on the next review.

17. Please identify if the long rectangular items shown on the plans are septic systems ( I don't want to assume incorrectly).

18. Parking for a care home with 10 residents requires 4 spaces, as you have provided at each lot. Staff noted how far away from the building on lot 3 that the parking is provided, which for a care home use does not appear compatible.

19. Note that each lot will have a separate plan review done at the time of permitting, with a floor plan, and elevations provided - and the number of proposed residents clarified.

20. Note that further comments may be forthcoming, depending upon the responses provided. I may be reached at Heather.Thrall@tucsonaz.gov or at 837-4951.


C:\planning\cdrc\tentativeplat\S07-202 stefan acres.doc

RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised tentative plat.
02/05/2008 ED ABRIGO PIMA COUNTY ASSESSOR Approved Office of the Pima County Assessor
115 N. Church Ave.
Tucson, Arizona 85701

BILL STAPLES
ASSESSOR




TO: CDRC Office
Subdivision Review
City of Tucson (FAX# 791-5559)
FROM: Gary Ault, Mapping Supervisor
Pima County Assessor’s Office
Mapping Department

DATE: January 31, 2008

RE: Assessor’s Review and Comments Regarding Tentative Plat

S07-202 STEFAN ACRES T141515


* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

X Plat meets Assessor’s Office requirements.
_______ Plat does not meet Assessor’s Office requirements.


COMMENTS: THANK YOU FOR YOUR SUBMITTAL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS PLEASE CALL SUSAN KING AT 740-4391

NOTE: THE ASSESSOR’S CURRENT INVOLVEMENT IN PROCESSING ITS MANUAL MAPS TO DIGITAL FORMAT IS EXPEDITED GREATLY BY EXCHANGE OF DIGITAL DATA. IN THE COURSE OF RECORDING THIS SUBDIVISION YOUR ASSISTANCE IN PROVIDING THIS OFFICE WITH AN AUTOCAD COPY WOULD BE GREATLY APPRECIATED. THANK YOU FOR ANY DIGITAL DATA PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED.





SUSAN KING



ROSANNA WERNER
02/06/2008 PAUL MACHADO ENGINEERING REVIEW Denied To: Patricia Gehlen DATE: February 6, 2008
CDRC/Zoning Manager

SUBJECT: Stefan Acres, 9430 E. Stefan Road
Tentative Plat S07-202 (First Review)
T14S, R15E, Section 15

RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Tentative Plat and Drainage Report.

The Tentative Plat (TP) and Drainage Report (DR) cannot be approved as submitted. Please address the following review comments prior to the next submittal.

Tentative Plat:

1. Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the TP.
2. As per the Federal ADA requirements, all wheel chair ramps shall have the truncated domes instead of the standard grooves that are shown on COT SD 207. Aside from the Truncated Domes, all wheel chair ramps shall be constructed in accordance with COT SD 207.
3. 5-year threshold retention is required for this project per rezoning condition no. 6.
4. Please provide property description per D.S. 2-02.2.1.3.
5. The project is subject to the xeroraparian intermediate habitat overlay zone. A mitigation report will be required. Contact Patricia Gehlan for further information.
6. Provide all existing and proposed buildings and structures, including location, size, height, overhangs, canopies, and use per D.S. 2-02.2.1.6.
7. Label existing and future sight visibility triangles per D.S. 2-02.2.1.10.
8. Show all points of egress and ingress including locations and width of driveways and parking area access lanes (P.A.A.L.) per D.S. 2-02.2.1.11.
9. Please label all vehicular, bicycle, pedestrian, and handicapped circulation clearly identified per D.S. 2-02.2.1.12.
10. Fully-dimensioned loading space(s) and maneuvering area(s) per D.S. 2-02.2.1.14.
11. Please provide Drainage patterns and finished grades per D.S. 2-02.2.1.16.
12. Please list estimated cut & fill quantities per D.S. 2-02.2.1.17.
13. Please show dimensioned right-of-way, including any applicable Major Streets and Routes (MS&R) Plan right-of-way per D.S. 2-02.2.1.19.
14. Add the basin(s) maintenance responsibility note per S.M.D.D.F.M. 2.3.1.6 C 1 and 2 to the TP.
15. Dimension from street monument lines to existing and proposed curbs, sidewalks, driveways, and utility lines per D.S. 2-02.2.1.21.
16. Please provide existing topographic contours at intervals not exceeding two (2) feet and/or spot elevations as pertinent and Bench Mark based on City of Tucson Datum, including City Field Book and page number per D.S. 2-02.2.1.23.
17. Show Tentative plat number (S07-202) on all sheets per D.S. 2-02.2.1.29.
18. Show refuse container location, size, and access thereto fully dimensioned per D.S. 2-02.2.1.32 and D.S. 6-01.0.
19. Placement of fill in excess of 2' above existing grade at any location in the outer 100' of the developing site is not allowed and/or shall meet the requirements per D.S. 11-01. Please address.
20. A permit or a private improvement agreement will be necessary for any work performed within the Right-of-way. Contact Permits and Codes at (520) 791-5100 for permit information.
21. Please show a typical cross section of the P.A.A.L. or call out the percentage of slopes. Call out the GB at the D/W, if applicable.
22. Please show the proposed roof drainage patterns, 100% of the 10-year flow must be conveyed under the sidewalks including any other site drainage as well. Please provide supporting calculations to demonstrate compliance with D.S. 3-01.4.4. If the location(s) of the roof scuppers have not yet been decided, a general note indicating sidewalk scuppers will be used when the roof scuppers locations have been designed and located will suffice.
23. Add note: "Depress all landscaped areas 6" maximum for water harvesting".
24. "A grading permit and Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plans (SWPPP's) will be required for this project. Submit 3 sets of grading and SWPPP's with text, upon completion and submittal of a grading permit application. A grading permit may not be issued prior to site plan approval. Subsequent comments may be necessary, depending upon the nature and extent of revisions that occur to the plans".
Drainage Report:
1. Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the DR.
2. A Drainage report is required for any site greater than one acre in size or for any site subject to detention requirements…..per S.M.D.D.F.M., chap. II, 2.1.2.
3. The content and format of the Drainage Report should follow S.M.D.D.F.M., chap. II, 2.2.
4. Show the project address or administration address on the cover sheet of the DR.
5. If applicable, add the basin(s) maintenance responsibility note and checklist per S.M.D.D.F.M. 2.3.1.6 C 1 and 2 to the DR.

If you have any questions, I can be reached at 837-4932 or Paul.Machado@tucsonaz.gov
Paul P. Machado
Senior Engineering Associate
City of Tucson/Development Services Department
201 N. Stone Avenue
P.O. Box 27210
Tucson, Arizona 85726-7210
(520) 837-4932 office
(520) 879-8010 fax
C:/9430 E. Stefan Rd. CDRC TP
02/07/2008 GLENN HICKS COT NON-DSD PARKS & RECREATION Approved PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT COMMENTS

City of Tucson CDRC - Community Design Review Committee


CASE NUMBER: S07-202
CASE NAME: Stefan Acres: TP
Submittal #: 1

COMMENTS DUE: 1/24/08 COMMENTS SENT: 2/6/08


Items being reviewed: (ü) Tentative or Final Plat
( ) Development Plan
(ü) Landscape Plan
( ) Other -

Related Cases: annexation - N/A
rezoning - C9-07-11
CDRC - N/A

Parks and Recreation Department Staff has reviewed this proposal and offers the following comments:


(ü) APPROVED - No Resubmittal Required.

(ü) No comment
( ) Proposal complies with annexation or rezoning conditions
( ) Proposal satisfies trails, recreational amenities, and/or parks and open space requirements
( ) No additional comments - complies with comments submitted on:


( ) NOT APPROVED - Resubmit the following. See attached comments.

( ) Tentative Plat
( ) Development Plan
( ) Landscape Plan
( ) Other


REVIEWER: Joanne Hershenhorn DATE: 2/6/08


S:\PARKS_AND_RECREATION_DEPT\REVIEW_COMMENTS\CDRC_Cases\2008_ReviewsS07-202_Stefan_Acres_TP.doc
02/22/2008 PGEHLEN1 PDEQ PIMA COUNTY DEPT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY Denied Comments have not yet been provided.
02/22/2008 PATRICIA GEHLEN ZONING-DECISION LETTER REVIEW Denied COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES

February 22, 2008

Jeffrey A. Stanley
Stanley Engineering and Drainage, Inc.
PO Box 1888
Tucson, Arizona 85702

Subject: S07-202 Stefan AcresTentative Plat

Dear Jeff:

Your submittal of December 24, 2007 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a DETAILED cover letter explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed:

ALL BLACKLINES MUST BE FOLDED

10 Copies Revised Tentative Plat (Fire, DUPD, Landscape, Addressing, ESD, Real Estate, Traffic, Zoning, Engineering, DSD)

5 Copies Revised Landscape Plan (DUPD, Landscape, Zoning, Engineering, DSD)

2 Copies Revised NPPO Plan (Landscape, DSD)

2 Copies Drainage Report (Engineering, DSD)

PLEASE NOTE THAT COMMENTS FOR PDEQ HAVE NOT YET BEEN PROVIDED. PLANS MAY NOT BE RESUBMITTED UNTIL COMMENTS ARE RECEIVED FROM PDEQ. IF THE PLANS ARE DENIED OR APPROVED CONDITIONALLY BY PDEQ, ONE MORE SET OF THE TENTATIVE PLAT MUST BE PROVIDED WITH THE SECONDE SUBMITTAL.

Should you have any questions, please call me at 837-4919.


Sincerely,


Patricia Gehlen
CDRC Manager

All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/

Via fax: ?????
Tp-resubmittal
02/22/2008 PGEHLEN1 PDEQ PIMA COUNTY DEPT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY Denied In accordance with Pima County Code, 7.21.038.B, please provide a geologic report including the results of percolation testing/soil characterization and appropriate depth boring logs for each proposed lot in the subdivision. These tests shall be performed by an engineer, geologist or other qualified person and shall demonstrate that an on-site disposal system can be permitted on each lot. Please also note the depth to groundwater in this report.

In accordance with Pima County Code, 7.21.038.C, show that each lot is sufficient size to accommodate an on-site disposal system for a four-bedroom house and provide a 100% reserve area to be shown on the tentative plat or a site map. The size of these systems shall be determined from the tests performed as required above, and applied to a hypothetical four bedroom residence. On-site disposal systems may not be located in a 100-year flood zone, or within 50 feet of washes and must maintain all required setbacks.


A revised tentative plat is required.
12/24/2007 FERNE RODRIGUEZ START PLANS SUBMITTED Completed
12/26/2007 JIM EGAN COT NON-DSD FIRE Denied Lot 4 will need automatic fire sprinklers because of distance to fire access and hydrant.