Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Plan Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Plan Number - S07-178
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01/30/2008 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 02/05/2008 | FRODRIG2 | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Denied | February 5, 2008 To: Samuel Mills RBF Consulting Thru: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Manager City of Tucson Development Services Department ___________________________ From: Tom Porter, Sr. CEA (520-740-6579), representing the Pima County Departments of Wastewater Management and Environment Quality Subject: La Estancia De Tucson - Phase II Tent. Plat – 2nd Submittal S07-178 The proposed sewer collection lines for the above-referenced project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use. This project will be tributary to the Roger Road Wastewater Treatment Facility via the Southeast Interceptor. Obtain a letter from the PCWMD's Development Services Section, written within the past 90 days, stating that treatment and conveyance system capacity for the project is available in the downstream public sewerage system and provide a copy of that letter to this office. The required form to request such a letter may be found at: http://www.pima.gov/wwm/forms/docs/CapResponseRequest.pdf. The tentative or preliminary plat for this project cannot be approved until a copy of this letter has been received by this office. In order to determine capacity PCWMD will require the projected flow calculations for this project via the Capacity Determination Request Form.2nd Request Sheet 1: Add a General Note that states: THIS PROJECT WILL HAVE ______ EXISTING AND______ PROPOSED WASTEWATER FIXTURE UNIT EQUIVALENTS PER TABLE 13.20.045(E)(1) IN PIMA COUNTY CODE 13.20.045(E). And fill in the blanks with the appropriate values. 2nd Request Sheet 7: Proposed by G-2006-017 MH #13 appears to be located outside the ROW. If so a 20’ public sewer easement must be shown around the manhole. Sheet 7: Missing rim and invert elevations for Prop MH #10 and Prop MH #13. Sheet 9: The sewer line in Circulo Rio Blanco is shown as existing. Indicate the IMS#’s for all of the existing public manholes and show the rim and invert elevations. Sheet 8: The private sewer line appears to come out of nowhere and then across Block 50. Revise or explain. Sheet 8: Show the sewer line segments off MH15 with length /slope and pipe size. Sheet 6-19: Show the pipe size for all proposed sewer lines. Sheet 6-19: Include the rim and invert elevations for all of the existing public manholes shown on plan. Sheet 12: MH 27 and MH26 must be located at least 45 degrees off of MH 8. Sheet 11: The terminal manhole #30 shown on plan must have a minimum of 1% terminal reach just in case it is not connected to in the future. This office will require a revised set of bluelines, and a response letter, addressing these comments. Additional comments may be made during the review of these documents. Pima County Code Title 13.20.030.A.2 requires that a wastewater review fee be paid for each submittal of the tentative or preliminary plat. The fee for the first submittal is $166 plus $50 per sheet. For the second submittal, the review fee is $50 per sheet. For all subsequent submittals, the review fee is $39 per sheet. The next submittal of this project will be the third(3rd) submittal. A check for the review fee of this submittal in the amount of $312.00 (made out to PIMA COUNTY TREASURER) must accompany the revised set of bluelines and response letter. If the number of sheets changes, please adjust the review fee accordingly. If you have any questions regarding the above-mentioned comments, please contact me. |
| 02/12/2008 | JIM EGAN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | |
| 02/28/2008 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1) Incorporate proposed riparian habitat mitigation for areas disturbed due to infrastructure construction where applicable. Show any mitigation for this phase on the landscape plan. DS 9-06.0 2) Revise the calculations for Acacia constricta to meet the minimum preservation requirements of LUC 3.8 for this phase. 3) Where natural washes cannot be maintained, a mitigation plan shall be established with emphasis being placed on earthen or naturally appearing channels with landscaping and texture/color added to bank protection materials. New channels, such as those found on sheet 4 of the tentative plat, should include mitigation plans that provide for naturally appearing channels. TCC 26-8(a)(3) 4) Approval of DSMR 08-09 is required prior to tentative plat approval. 5) Revise the Environmental Resource Report to include a detailed Plant Inventory of individual woody plants and cacti rooted within the encroachment area referred to in DS 9-06.2.5.B. Alternatively, an explanation of the PRA delineations can be included and addressed in the ERR application. 6) Revise the landscape plan to incorporate water harvesting into the proposed street landscaping. The City of Tucson's Office of Conservation and Sustainable Development is available for consultation regarding water harvesting principles, techniques and code requirements. Please contact Ann Audrey or Frank Sousa in OCSD to make an appointment. LUC 3.7.4.3. RESUBMITTAL OF ALL PLANS IS REQUIRED |
| 02/28/2008 | FRODRIG2 | COT NON-DSD | REAL ESTATE | Denied | S07-178 La Estancia de Tucson Phase II: Resubmittal - CDRC - Tentative Plat Review -Sht. 6/19, the 20' wide Waterline Easement along the N. Line of the NW 1/4 of Sec. 19, dedicated by Bk. 54 Pg. 22, was abandoned by Dkt. 12970 Pg. 1752, rcrd. 1/12/07. Request Subject Plat reflect this information. -Sht. 2/19, Keynote 12, more detail is required concerning proposed maintenance by the City concerning drainage improvements w/in R/W. Concerns include the following: Legal access to in/outlets of pipes; C,C&R (Dkt./Pg.) 11430/1534 is not accepted by the City, and; No documentation was located to show the City has accepted the responsibility to maintain, service and/or replace drainage improvements. Request DOT/Permits & Codes be contacted concerning P.I.A. concerns and this office advised of results. Andy (520) 837-6715 Real Estate Division fax 791-5641 |
| 02/28/2008 | FRODRIG2 | COT NON-DSD | REAL ESTATE | Denied | Ref.: My 2/27/08 Comments, S07-178 La Estancia de Tucson Phase II: Resubmittal - CDRC - Tentative Plat Review Per Above Ref., request the following be treated as additional comments: -Tucson Water is in the process to determine a location for a wellsite w/in the proposed Subject Plat and a decision is expected w/in the next 10 days. The site is to be by conveyed by dedication and method of conveyance (i.e. by plat or separate instrument) has not been decided at this time. The wellsite will require an area large enough to equip the well and allow construction. Access also needs to be provided. RES 2006-064, circulated 3/16/06, received this request from Tucson Water as a condition when the City vacated R/W and abandoned Park and Water parcels, adopted by Mayor and Council, Ordinance 10335, 11/7/06. The following statements were provided in my previous e-mail and are provided for reference; S07-178 La Estancia de Tucson Phase II: Resubmittal - CDRC - Tentative Plat Review -Sht. 6/19, the 20' wide Waterline Easement along the N. Line of the NW 1/4 of Sec. 19, dedicated by Bk. 54 Pg. 22, was abandoned by Dkt. 12970 Pg. 1752, rcrd. 1/12/07. Request Subject Plat reflect this information. -Sht. 2/19, Keynote 12, more detail is required concerning proposed maintenance by the City concerning drainage improvements w/in R/W. Concerns include the following: Legal access to in/outlets of pipes; C,C&R (Dkt./Pg.) 11430/1534 is not accepted by the City, and; No documentation was located to show the City has accepted the responsibility to maintain, service and/or replace drainage improvements. Request DOT/Permits & Codes be contacted concerning P.I.A. concerns and this office advised of results. Andy (520) 837-6715 Real Estate Division fax 791-5641 |
| 02/28/2008 | JOSE ORTIZ | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Approved | |
| 02/29/2008 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Approved | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: La Estancia De Tucson Phase II Tentative Plat S07-178 (2nd Review) TRANSMITTAL DATE: February 29, 2008 DUE DATE: February 28, 2008 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. The Zoning Review Section verifies that the tentative plat meets the requirements of the Land Use Code. However, should there be any changes requested by other CDRC members, the Zoning Review Section approval is void, and we request copies of the corrected tentative plat to verify that those changes do not affect any zoning requirements. 2. D.S. 2-03.2.4.C Provide a copy of the covenants, conditions and restrictions (CC&R's) with the final plat. 3. The PAD document is under review and additional comments maybe forth coming. Tentative Plat should incorporate any applicable changes to the PAD after/if staff reviews required revisions to PAD document. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4956. C:\planning\cdrc\tentativeplat\S07-155tp-2nd.doc RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised tentative plat, site plan and additional requested documents. |
| 02/29/2008 | KAY MARKS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Denied | 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 KAY MARKS ADDRESSING OFFICIAL PH: 740-6480 FAX #: 740-6370 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL SUBJECT: S07-178 LA ESTANCIA DE TUCSON PHASE II/REVISED TENTATIVE PLAT DATE: 2/28/08 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and the following matters must be resolved prior to our approval: Delete Bk 60, Pg 40 and Bk 48, Pg 61 on Location Map. Delete all dockets and pages on Final Plat. Change Section 14 to 24 on pgs. 2 & 10. Change Via Bombachas to Vuelta de Ocho Rios on pg. 12. es |
| 02/29/2008 | ROGER HOWLETT | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Approved | DEPARTMENT OF URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN COMMENTS Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT S07-178 La Estancia De Tucson Phase II 2/28/08 ( X ) Tentative Plat () Development Plan () Landscape Plan () Revised Plan/Plat () Board of Adjustment () Other CROSS REFERENCE: NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: La Estancia PAD-7 GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: COMMENTS DUE BY: 2/28/08 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: () No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment () Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions () RCP Proposal Complies with Plan Policies ( ) See Additional Comments Attached ( X ) No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: 12/21/07 ( X ) No Resubmittal Required: ( ) Tentative Plat () Development Plan () Landscape Plan ( ) Other REVIEWER: JBeall 791-4505 DATE: 2/28/08 |
| 03/10/2008 | GLENN HICKS | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Denied | PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT COMMENTS City of Tucson CDRC – Community Design Review Committee CASE NUMBER: S07-178 CASE NAME: La Estancia de Tucson, Phase II Submittal #: 2 COMMENTS DUE: 2/28/08 COMMENTS SENT: 3/7/08 Items being reviewed: () Tentative or Final Plat (Block Plat) ( ) Development Plan () Landscape Plan ( ) Other - Related: annexation - N/A rezoning - La Estancia PAD, October 11, 1999 (SP 9298) CDRC – S05-098 Adopted land use plan(s) – La Estancia PAD& revisions to Parks and Recreation Department Staff has reviewed this proposal and offers the following comments: () APPROVED – No Resubmittal Required. () No comment () Proposal complies with annexation or rezoning conditions () RCP Proposal; complies with land use plan () Proposal satisfies trails, recreational amenities, and/or parks and open space requirements () No additional comments - complies with comments submitted on: () NOT APPROVED – Resubmit the following. See attached comments. () Tentative Plat ( ) Development Plan () Landscape Plan () Other – Development Agreement? REVIEWER: Joanne Hershenhorn DATE: 3/6/08 S:\PARKS_AND_RECREATION_DEPT\REVIEW_COMMENTS\CDRC_Cases\2008_ReviewsS07-178_La_Estancia_Ph_2_block_plat.doc La Estancia Block Plat, Phase II S07-178 Please add the following use to General Note #3: open space (i.e., the proposed uses of this plat are MDR, … and Open Space, in accordance with the La Estancia Planned Area Development…). Also, please note that the name of the La Estancia Specific Plan has been changed to the La Estancia Planned Area Development. Please indicate on the plat cover sheet that the purposes of common areas D and E is parks/open space. The letter of refinement dated July 20, 2007, indicates that the approximately 7.6-acre public community park (plat Block 43) will be constructed by La Estancia prior to the issuance by the City of Tucson of the 500th final inspection permit of a residential unit in Phase 1. Staff would like to process a modification of the PAD so that the park will be constructed by La Estancia prior to the issuance of the 500th final inspection permit of a residential unit anywhere within the La Estancia PAD. Please coordinate with John Beall of the Department of Urban Planning and Design and Joanne Hershenhorn of the Parks and Recreation Department to process this PAD modification. Please change Phasing Note #1 on tentative plat sheet 2/19 to reflect the above-referenced letter of refinement. According to the La Estancia PAD Open Space and Recreation Plan, prior to approval of the master block plat, the controlling property owner and COT Parks and Recreation Department (Parks) need to enter into a development agreement regarding the Julian Wash linear park, Community Park, and Gas Line Park. Please contact Joanne Hershehorn at 791-4505 to discuss this. |
| 03/25/2008 | LAITH ALSHAMI | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | Laith Alshami, Engineering and Floodplain Review, 03/25/2008, TO: Patricia Gehlen FROM: Laith Alshami, P.E. CDRC Engineering SUBJECT: La Estancia De Tucson, Phase II S07-178, T15S, R15E, SECTION 19 RECEIVED: Tentative Plat, Landscape Plan and Drainage Report on January 30, 2008 The subject submittal has been reviewed and it can not be approved at this time. Address the following comments before review can continue. Prepare a detailed response that explains the revisions that were made and references the exact location in the Drainage Report and on the Tentative Plat where the revisions were made: Drainage Report: 1. Show the location of Channel 5A on the drainage exhibits. 2. Change the last paragraph, on Page 6, to include detention also. 3. According to Section 11.2.3. of the "Standards Manual for Drainage Design and Floodplain Management in Tucson, AZ", the minimum pipe/culvert diameter shall be two feet and the minimum box culvert height shall be four feet. Revise the Section 6.3 Culvert, on page 7, and all associated tables and calculations accordingly. 4. Show the locations of the channel cross sections shown on Exhibit 5. 5. Clarify what Pyramat is and explain why cross section B, on Exhibit 5, does not show Pyramat lining. Please be advised that slope treatments and stabilization shall be based on the Geotechnical Report recommendations. Provide a copy of the Geotechnical Report. 6. It appears that the velocities in the proposed drainage structures are erosive. Provide erosion control structures wherever needed. Provide all design calculations. 7. Submit two copies of the revised drainage report addendum. Tentative Plat: 1. Revise the project Title to include the proposed Common Areas descriptions (e.g. Common Area "A" (detention/retention), Common Area "B" (Open Space) etc.) (D.S. 2-03.2.1.G.2.). 2. Show the off-site runoff that enters and exits the site through Block 53. Show the drainage structures which convey this runoff. (D.S. 2-03.2.4.L.7). 3. Identify the name of the minor collector street in Cross Section "C", on Sheet 3/19. Additionally, the width of the street does not meet the street widths found in the La Estancia Specific Plan. The minimum width shall be 75'. Revise as needed. 4. Show a typical detail for the proposed wheelchair ramps with the required truncated domes as per the Federal ADA requirements. 5. Revise the Tentative Plat according to the Drainage Report revisions. 6. Revise the engineering stamps to include the expiration dates as required by the Board of Registration. Landscape Plan: 1. Landscape plans are acceptable pertaining to Engineering and Floodplain Review. Prepare a detailed response that explains the revisions that were made and references the exact location in the drainage report and on the Tentative Plat where the revisions were made. RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Revised Block Plat and Master Drainage Report Addendum |
| 03/26/2008 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES March 26, 2008 Samuel Mills RBF Consulting 3011 West Ina Road, Suite 115 Tucson, Arizona 85741 Subject: S07-178 La Estancia De Tucson Phase II Tentative Plat Dear Samuel: Your submittal of January 30, 2008 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a DETAILED cover letter explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLACKLINES MUST BE FOLDED 8 Copies Revised Tentative Plat (Addressing, Wastewater, Zoning, Landscape, Real Estate, Engineering, Parks and Recreation, DSD) 5 Copies Revised Landscape Plan (Zoning, Landscape, Engineering, Parks and Recreation, DSD) 2 Copies Environmental Resource Report (Landscape, DSD) 2 Copies Master Drainage Report Addendum (Engineering, DSD) Should you have any questions, please call me at 837-4919. Sincerely, Patricia Gehlen CDRC Manager All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: 797-3236 |