Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Plan Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Plan Number - S07-178
Review Name: TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01/04/2008 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES January 4, 2008 Samuel Mills RBF Consulting 3011 West Ina Road, Suite 115 Tucson, Arizona 85741 Subject: S07-178 La Estancia De Tucson Phase II Tentative Plat Dear Samuel: Your submittal of November 14, 2007 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a DETAILED cover letter explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLACKLINES MUST BE FOLDED 11 Copies Revised Tentative Plat (Addressing, Wastewater, Fire, Traffic, Zoning, Landscape, Real Estate, Engineering, DUPD, Parks and Recreation, DSD) 6 Copies Revised Landscape Plan (Zoning, Landscape, Engineering, DUPD, Parks and Recreation, DSD) 2 Copies Revised NPPO Plan (Landscape, DSD) 2 Copies Traffic Report (Traffic, DSD) 2 Copies Environmental Resource Report (Landscape, DSD) 2 Copies Master Drainage Report Addendum (Engineering, DSD) Should you have any questions, please call me at 837-4919. Sincerely, Patricia Gehlen CDRC Manager All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: 797-3236 |
| 11/13/2007 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 11/19/2007 | CDRC1 | OTHER AGENCIES | PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS | Approved | >>> "Aichong Sun" <asun@pagnet.org> 11/19/2007 11:30 AM >>> CASE: S07-178, LA ESTANCIA DE TUCSON PHASE II COMMENT: More specific information is needed to estimate the traffic impact, typically number of housing units for residential development and floor area for commercial development. Please call if you have questions, Aichong Sun Pima Association of Governments 177 N. Church Ave, #405 Tucson, AZ 85701 Tel: (520) 792-1093, Fax: (520) 620-6981 Web: www.PAGnet.org and www.RTAmobility.com |
| 11/30/2007 | PGEHLEN1 | TUCSON WATER NEW AREA DEVELOPMENT | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 12/06/2007 | FRODRIG2 | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Denied | December 4, 2007 To: Samuel Mills RBF Consulting Thru: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Manager City of Tucson Development Services Department ___________________________ From: Tom Porter, Sr. CEA (520-740-6579), representing the Pima County Departments of Wastewater Management and Environment Quality Subject: La Estancia De Tucson - Phase II Tent. Plat - 1st Submittal S07-178 The proposed sewer collection lines for the above-referenced project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use. This project will be tributary to the Roger Road Wastewater Treatment Facility via the Southeast Interceptor. Obtain a letter from the PCWMD's Development Services Section, written within the past 90 days, stating that treatment and conveyance system capacity for the project is available in the downstream public sewerage system and provide a copy of that letter to this office. The required form to request such a letter may be found at: http://www.pima.gov/wwm/forms/docs/CapResponseRequest.pdf. The tentative or preliminary plat for this project cannot be approved until a copy of this letter has been received by this office. In order to determine capacity PCWMD will require the projected flow calculations for this project via the Capacity Determination Request Form. All Sheets: Show the jurisdiction’s case number, S07-178, in or near the title block of each sheet. This case number should be shown larger and bolder than any associated cross-reference numbers. Sheet 1: Add a General Note that states: THIS PROJECT WILL HAVE ______ EXISTING AND______ PROPOSED WASTEWATER FIXTURE UNIT EQUIVALENTS PER TABLE 13.20.045(E)(1) IN PIMA COUNTY CODE 13.20.045(E). And fill in the blanks with the appropriate values. Sheet 6: The sewer line shown on plan in Paseo Monte de Oro does not exist but on this plan is shown as existing. Refer to this line as proposed by others per plan #_______. Make the corresponding change in the Legend on Sheet 1. Sheet 6- 19: Revise the plan to show the pipe size for all the sewer lines both proposed and existing . Sheet 7: Is the 8” stubout off of the unidentified existing MH public or private. If it is intended to be public it must be a blockout and not stubout. Sheet 7-16: Identify the “existing” manholes/sewer lines with a number and proposed by others per previous comment. Sheet 8: Is the 8” stubout off of MH#26 public or private. If it is intended to be public it must be a blockout and not stubout. Clearly mark the segment as private if that is the case. Sheet 9: Call out the existing public sewer line running along Kolb Rd. with the construction plan # and pipe size. Also identify the existing public manhole with the IMS #. Sheet 10: Call out the existing public sewer lines running along Wilmot Rd. with the construction plan # and pipe size. Also identify the existing public manholes with the IMS #’s. Sheet 11: The existing MH shown in Wilmot needs to have an IMS and is the proposed 8”stubout existing or proposed? Please clarify. Sheet 11: The terminal manholes shown on plan must have a minimum of 1% terminal reach. Sheet 12: Show the sewer line invert in relation to the RCBC crossing. Sheet 13: Show the sewer line invert in relation to the RCBC crossing. Sheet 13: The terminal manhole #16 shown on plan must have a minimum of 1% terminal reach. Sheet 15,16,18 &19: Call out the existing public sewer lines running along Wilmot Rd. and along the freeway with the construction plan # and pipe size. Also identify the existing public manholes with the IMS #’s. This office will require a revised set of bluelines, and a response letter, addressing these comments. Additional comments may be made during the review of these documents. Pima County Code Title 13.20.030.A.2 requires that a wastewater review fee be paid for each submittal of the tentative or preliminary plat. The fee for the first submittal is $166 plus $50 per sheet. For the second submittal, the review fee is $50 per sheet. For all subsequent submittals, the review fee is $39 per sheet. The next submittal of this project will be the second (2nd) submittal. A check for the review fee of this submittal in the amount of $650.00 (made out to PIMA COUNTY TREASURER) must accompany the revised set of bluelines and response letter. If the number of sheets changes, please adjust the review fee accordingly. If you have any questions regarding the above-mentioned comments, please contact me. |
| 12/06/2007 | KAY MARKS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Denied | 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 KAY MARKS ADDRESSING OFFICIAL PH: 740-6480 FAX #: 740-6370 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL SUBJECT: S07-178 LA ESTANCIA DE TUCSON PHASE II/TENTATIVE PLAT DATE: December 6, 2007 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and the following matters must be resolved prior to our approval: Point Via Bombachas to the correct location on Location Map. Label existing streets on pg. 1 layout. Correct adjacent subdivision information on pgs. 7, 8, 9 & 10. The street labeled Via Bombachas (south of Camino Boleadoras) will need a new street name with the suffix of Loop. jg |
| 12/07/2007 | JIM EGAN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Denied | Note 16. The International Fire Code Sections for water supply and hydrants are Section 508 and Appendix B. |
| 12/11/2007 | JOSE ORTIZ | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Denied | December 10, 2007 ACTIVITY NUMBER: S07-178 PROJECT NAME: La Estancia De Tucson Phase II PROJECT ADDRESS: 6930 E Camino Boleadoras PROJECT REVIEWER: Jose E. Ortiz PE, Traffic Engineer Resubmittal Required: Traffic Engineering does not recommend approval of the Tentative Plat; therefore a revised Tentative Plat is required for re-submittal. The following items must be revised or added to the plat. 1. Include a response letter with the next submittal that states how all comments have been addressed. 2. Provide the copy of CLA's Traffic report referred to in note 32. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-4259 x76730 or Jose.Ortiz@tucsonaz.gov |
| 12/12/2007 | TOM MARTINEZ | OTHER AGENCIES | AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION | Approved | ADOT has no comments on this submittal. -------------------------------------------------------- Confidentiality and Nondisclosure Notice: This email transmission and any attachments are intended for use by the person(s)/entity(ies) named above and may contain confidential/privileged information. Any unauthorized use, disclosure or distribution is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by email, and delete or destroy all copies plus attachments. |
| 12/13/2007 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: La Estancia De Tucson Phase II Tentative Plat S07-178 (1st Review) TRANSMITTAL DATE: December 13, 2007 DUE DATE: December 12, 2007 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. Section 4.1.7.1, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a tentative plat. If, at the end of that time, the tentative plat has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this tentative plat is November 13, 2008. 2. D.S. 2-03.2.1.D.2 Identify the following conditions within the area of the location map, subdivisions (by book and page). 3. D.S. 2-03.2.1.G The title block should include a listing of the Common Areas (C.E.). 4. D.S. 2-03.2.2.B.1 Place the S07-178 subdivision case number in the lower right corner of the plat next to the title block. 5. D.S. 2-03.2.2.B.2 Provide a general note stating "EXISTING ZONING IS PAD 7". 6. D.S. 2-03.2.2.B.7 Provide a general note stating ""THIS PLAT IS DESIGNED TO MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE OVERLAY ZONES CRITERIA: SEC. 2.8.3 MAJOR STREETS AND ROUTES (MS&R) SETBACK ZONE". 7. D.S. 2-03.2.4.B Provide the square footage for each proposed block on the plat. 8. D.S. 2-03.2.4.C There are blocks called out on the plan as "CE", this appears to be a "Common Element". Common elements are normally associated with condominium plats, please clarify if the blocks designated as "CE" are common elements or common areas. Some of the "CE" blocks appear that they will be exclusive to adjacent blocks only, please clarify. Provide documentation, i.e. covenants, conditions and restrictions (CC&R's) which provide for the maintenance for the common elements shown on the plat. 9. D.S. 2-03.2.4.I Block 43 PARK, is this block to be dedicated to the City of Tucson as a park? 10. Provide a note on the plan stating that "An approved development plan, and/or tentative/final plat will be required for each proposed block prior to development. 11. The PAD document is under review and additional comments maybe forth coming. Tentative Plat should incorporate any applicable changes to the PAD after/if staff reviews required revisions to PAD document. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4956. C:\planning\cdrc\tentativeplat\S07-155tp.doc RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised tentative plat, site plan and additional requested documents. |
| 12/14/2007 | ROBERT YOUNG | PIMA COUNTY | PIMA CTY - DEV REVIEW | Passed | |
| 12/14/2007 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1) Add the CDRC case number and any related case numbers to the landscape and native plant preservation plans. DS 2-07.2.1.B 2) Revise the tentative plat to include landscape easements along the major streets to accommodate required street landscape borders. LUC 4.1.8.4 3) Native Plant Preservation and Landscape Plans are required for infrastructure associated with this Block Plat. The implementation of native plant mitigation plans should not be deferred. LUC 3.8.3.1, LUC 3.7.1.2. Final plans for future development can be deferred until plats and development plans are submitted. 4) Revise the development plan to include existing floodplain information, including the location of the 100-year flood limits and water surface elevations for all flows of one hundred (100) cfs. 5) The site contains regulatory floodplain areas that may contain riparian habitat. This habitat may not unnecessarily altered per TCC Sec. 26-5.2. Refer to DS 2-13 for the preparation, submittal, and review procedures for development within areas that have environmentally valuable habitat in conformance with Article 1, Division 1, Floodplain and Erosion Hazard Area Regulations. 6) Submit an Environmental Resource Report (ERR) per DS 2-13.2.5.B.1 if encroachment is proposed in the regulatory area. The report will document (1) the areas that contain riparian and wildlife habitat that is to be preserved and (2) those areas without such habitat within the regulatory floodplain. 7) All development within the Protected Riparian Area shall be reviewed to insure that there is no unnecessary disturbance of the riparian resources. Refer to DS 2-13.2.5.B.2 for the section on Development Restrictions and revise the plans as necessary to comply. 8) Where any development encroaches within the Protected Riparian Areas, mitigation will be required. A mitigation report shall be submitted with the Environmental Resource Report demonstrating that the proposed mitigation is in conformance with this subsection and applicable codes. DS 2-13.2.5.C 9) Landscape plans are required to document compliance with the mitigation plan requirements. A summary of mitigation and preservation requirements shall be included on the plans. The plans shall show the location of mitigation areas; techniques used for mitigating impacts to, or preservation of, natural areas; specifications for restoration and revegetation of disturbed areas; and general compliance with the applicable standards. Revise as necessary. 10) Where natural washes cannot be maintained, a mitigation plan shall be established with emphasis being placed on earthen or naturally appearing channels with landscaping and texture/color added to bank protection materials. Include mitigation plans for constructed channels and basins that provide for naturally appearing channels. TCC 26-8(a)(3) 11) Revise the landscape plans to provide planting plans for any basins to be constructed in association with the infrastructure. LUC 3.7.4.3, DS 10-01 12) Correct general note 3 on sheet L2 to include any additional project elements associated with the infrastructure development. 13) Revise the salvage and Mitigation Analysis on sheet L2. The grading limits on the plans indicate only a portion of the site will be graded initially. 14) Verify that the statement regarding "no washes within the project boundary" is accurate. TDOT maps indicate several watercourses. 15) The plans indicate utility easements at several locations where street landscape borders will be required along major streets. Revise the plans to eliminate interference of conflicts. We recommend that approval be obtained from utilities for proposed landscaping. LUC 3.7.2.6.B 16) Note the location of any existing billboards on the plans and provide landscape and screening per LUC Table 3.7.2-I where applicable. RESUBMITTAL OF ALL PLANS IS REQUIRED |
| 12/17/2007 | ANDY VERA | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | 1. Provide a note on the plan stating that "An approved development plan, and/or tentative/final plat will be required for each proposed block prior to development. 2. Provisions for refuse and recycle collection service must be shown and demonstrate adequate access and maeuverability within each development. Refer to DS 6-01.0. If you have any questions you may contact Andy Vera at (520) 791-5543 ext 1212 or e-mail: Andy.Vera@tucsonaz.gov |
| 12/17/2007 | ED ABRIGO | PIMA COUNTY | ASSESSOR | Approv-Cond | Office of the Pima County Assessor 115 N. Church Ave. Tucson, Arizona 85701 BILL STAPLES ASSESSOR TO: CDRC Office Subdivision Review City of Tucson (FAX# 791-5559) FROM: Gary Ault, Mapping Supervisor Pima County Assessor’s Office Mapping Department DATE: December 13, 2007 RE: Assessor’s Review and Comments Regarding Tentative Plat S07-178 LA ESTANCIA DE TUCSON PHASE II T151519 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * X Plat meets Assessor’s Office requirements. _______ Plat does not meet Assessor’s Office requirements. COMMENTS: PLEASE MAKE THE FOLLOWING ADJUSTMENTS BY FINAL PLAT STAGE: ADD REORDING INFO FOR ALL EXSTING STREETS. ADD SQUARE FOOTAGE FOR ALL BLOCKS. THANK YOU FOR YOUR SUBMITTAL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS PLEASE CALL ROSANNA WERNER AT 740-4390 NOTE: THE ASSESSOR’S CURRENT INVOLVEMENT IN PROCESSING ITS MANUAL MAPS TO DIGITAL FORMAT IS EXPEDITED GREATLY BY EXCHANGE OF DIGITAL DATA. IN THE COURSE OF RECORDING THIS SUBDIVISION YOUR ASSISTANCE IN PROVIDING THIS OFFICE WITH AN AUTOCAD COPY WOULD BE GREATLY APPRECIATED. THANK YOU FOR ANY DIGITAL DATA PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED. ROSANNA WERNER |
| 12/18/2007 | FRODRIG2 | COT NON-DSD | REAL ESTATE | Denied | S07-178 La Estancia De Tucson Phase II: Tentative Plat Review -Request status to the following easements that are annotated for abandonment by separate instrument: --40' wide pvt. easement (Dkt./Pg. 10235/472), Sht. 11/19. --15' wide pvt. easement (Dkt./Pg. 10686/539) --20' wide easement established by Bk. 54 Pg. 27., Sht. 6/19. --40' wide in/egress/gas util. easement established by Dkt./Pg. 10235/472, Sht. 12/19. -Concerning box culverts w/in Right-of-Way at the intersection of Camino Boleadoras/Street "A" (Sht 6/19) & Via Bombachas and to reference DSD Drainage Design Manual, section 1.5, Maintenance of Drainage Improvements: Request Real Estate Division be informed of proposed maintenance concerning possible easements. -Request any consideration to a proposed water source in light of Wellsite E-028A, E. of Blk. 35. |
| 12/21/2007 | LAITH ALSHAMI | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | Laith Alshami, Engineering and Floodplain Review, 12/21/2007 TO: Patricia Gehlen FROM: Laith Alshami, P.E. CDRC Engineering SUBJECT: La Estancia De Tucson, Phase II S07-178, T15S, R15E, SECTION 19 RECEIVED: Tentative Plat, Landscape Plan and Drainage Report on November 14, 2007 The subject submittal has been reviewed and it can not be approved at this time. Address the following comments before review can continue. Prepare a detailed response that explains the revisions that were made and references the exact location in the Drainage Report and on the Tentative Plat where the revisions were made: Drainage Report: 1. The original Master Drainage Report was reviewed and approved through a lengthy process that took many months. The information in the approved master report was used to develop Phase I. At this point, this Office does not see the need to revise the entire Master Drainage Report for Phase II development. The Engineering Consultant may however submit a Master Drainage Report Addendum to address minor modifications to some of the subwatersheds and the sizing of the detention basins as a result of the proposed revised street alignments. 2. The new Julian Wash alignment LOMR has just been submitted to FEMA. The new Julian Wash improvements and alignment will result in full 100-year runoff containment. This information shall be reflected in the drainage report addendum. 3. The "Critical/Balanced Basin" designation will not be impacted by the new Julian Wash alignment. Revise the text in the report accordingly. 4. The revise Q100 for Sub-basin #2 appears to be too low and the used basin factor appears to be too high. Revise the runoff estimate calculations for Sub-basin #2. 5. The upstream and downstream runoff information in Table 5.4 is not clear. Explain the purpose of this information and how the runoff values were determined. 6. Revise the drainage structure maintenance section to specify the maintenance responsibilities, what needs to be maintained, how often and how. Provide a maintenance checklist that contains all that information. This Office recommends including a copy of the drainage structure maintenance checklist to the CC & R's to allow the owners association access to the list in order to facilitate their maintenance responsibility. 7. It not clear what is meant by the "final drainage report for La Estancia Phase II". The submitted drainage report should be the only report for the proposed block platting of Phase II. The individual parcel will have their own development drainage reports. Clarify the information in "Section 7.1 Channel Bank". Tentative Plat: 1. Since this plan is for block platting phase II and it does not include significant improvements, which might require showing a lot of detailed information, we recommend using a smaller scale to reduce the number of used sheets and make it easier for review. 2. Revise the project Title to include the lots/parcel numbers and the proposed Common Areas D.S. 2-03.2.1.G.2. 3. Provide the correct S (yr)-______ subdivision case number according to D.S. 2-03.2.2.B.1. 4. Add the existing zoning note as required by D.S. 2-03.2.2.B.2. 5. Show how the Basis of Bearing ties into the proposed development (D.S. 2-03.2.3.A.). 6. Special Note #1 states that Lots 52 and 53 are subject to COT Floodplain Regulations, yet the plan does not show that the lots are in the regulatory floodplain. Either revise the plan or the note. 7. Are the requirements in the special notes required by the City of Tucson as development condition (i.e. rezoning /annexation conditions, PAD conditions, etc.). If this is the case, clarify this on the plan. 8. Is the interim drainage easement described in Keynote #8 existing? Clarify this information in Keynote #8 and explain the reason for the proposed abandonment. 9. The existing elevation contour lines are not clear. Revise the plan to show darker contours (D.S. 2-03.2.3.F.). 10. Existing easements, proposed to be abandoned by a separate instrument, shall be processed before the final plat can be approved. The final plat will not show the easements and abandonment recorded documents shall be submitted with the final plat. 11. It does not appear that the proposed street storm drain design calculations were included in the drainage report. Address this issue and revise as needed. 12. Show existing storm drainage facilities, including channels, on and adjacent to the site as required by D.S. 2-03.2.3.G.). 13. Show 100-year floodplain limits for all flows of 100 cfs or more as required by D.S. 2-03.2.3.J. and D.S. 2-03.2.4.L.6. 14. Is the slope easement, described in Keynote #1 temporary for the roadway construction or is it permanent? 15. Show detention/retention basins including the 100-year ponding limits with water surface elevations as required by D.S. 2-03.2.4.L.1. 16. Indicate proposed drainage solutions as required by D.S. 2-03.2.4.L.2. 17. Show locations and types of drainage structures and crossings, pipes, culverts, erosion control structures, spillways etc. (i.e. label the proposed drainage structures and provide the construction information such as the invert elevations, the type of material, the size and dimensions, the number of structures, spillway cross sections etc.) (D.S. 2-03.2.4.L.3). 18. Provide proposed ground elevations at different points on each lot for reference to future grading and site drainage (D.S. 2-03.2.4.L.4). 19. Verification is required when any drainage solution occurring outside the boundaries of the plat is constructed with adjacent owner's permission. Verify compliance with this standard as required by D.S. 2-03.2.4.L.5. 20. Draw locations and indicate types of off-site runoff acceptance points and/or on-site runoff discharge points (D.S. 2-03.2.4.L.7). 21. Show the proposed detention/retention basin inlet and outlet erosion control measures. Additionally, show the required detention basin Sediment Control Structures (D.S. 2-03.2.4.L.3). 22. Show building setback lines from the slopes and the proposed detention/retention basins (D.S. 2-03.2.4.M.). Please be advised that detention/retention basin setback lines are different from slope setback lines and both should be determined in the Geotechnical Report. Additionally, show all sight visibility triangles dimensions. 23. Show the applicable sight visibility triangle as required by D.S. 2-03.2.4.L.7. 24. Provide the proposed detention/retention basins dimensions, side slopes and ponding depth. Additionally, verify that security barriers are not required for the basins (D.S. 2-03.2.4.L.). 25. Provide adequate spot elevations on the streets and lots, including grade breaks, to clarify the proposed drainage directions (D.S. 2-03.2.4.L.2 & 4.). 26. Submit a Geotechnical Report that addresses drainage setback lines and slope protection. Demonstrate compliance with the Geotechnical Report on the Tentative Plat. 27. Show the proposed detention/retention basin maintenance access ramps including their widths and slopes. According to Section 14.3 of the "Standard Manual for Drainage Design and Floodplain Management In Tucson, Arizona", the maintenance access ramps should be wide enough to accommodate vehicular access. The minimum width should be 15' and the ramp slope should not exceed 15 percent. Please be advised that maintenance ramps should be designed in such a way that does not allow access to vehicles except maintenance vehicles. 28. Due to the size of this project, it will require a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP). Submit a SWPPP with the Grading Plan submittal. 29. Work in the public right of way requires an excavation permit and may require a Private Improvement Agreement. Check with Transportation Department Permits and Codes for additional information. 30. This Office recommends including the drainage structures maintenance checklist in the CC & R's to allow the owners' association access to it and to facilitate their maintenance responsibility. 31. As per Federal ADA requirements, all wheel chair ramps shall have the Truncated Domes instead of the standard grooves, which are shown on City of Tucson Standard Detail 207. Aside from the Truncated Domes, the wheel chair ramps shall be constructed in accordance with the Standard Detail 207. 32. Add A general note to the Tentative Plat and the Final Plat stating that "the subject project is impacted by an existing underground natural gas pipeline, which is located within a north-south 66' wide utility easement located midway within this subdivision. See sheets X, X, X, etc for exact dimensions.". 33. Revise the Tentative Plat according to the Drainage Report revisions. Landscape Plan: 1. Ensure that the proposed landscaping will not conflict with the detention/retention basins maintenance access ramps, inlets and outlets and sediment traps. Prepare a detailed response that explains the revisions that were made and references the exact location in the drainage report and on the Tentative Plat where the revisions were made. RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Revised Block Plat and Master Drainage Report Addendum |
| 12/21/2007 | ROGER HOWLETT | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Denied | DEPARTMENT OF URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN COMMENTS Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT S07-178 La Estancia De Tucson Phase II 12/21/07 ( X ) Tentative Plat () Development Plan () Landscape Plan () Revised Plan/Plat () Board of Adjustment () Other CROSS REFERENCE: NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: La Estancia PAD-7 GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: COMMENTS DUE BY: 12/12/07 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: () No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment () Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions () RCP Proposal Complies with Plan Policies ( X ) See Additional Comments Attached () No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: ( X ) Resubmittal Required: ( X ) Tentative Plat () Development Plan () Landscape Plan ( X ) Cross Section – C. Minor Collector Road REVIEWER: JBeall 791-4505 DATE: 12/21/07 Comments The cross section, C. Minor Collector Road, on Sheet 3 of 19, appears to differ from the cross section, Spine-Minor Collector (Exhibit 2 – D) found in the La Estancia PAD. Although both cross sections show a 70’ ROW width, the cross section in the tentative plat indicates a 3- foot width for landscaping, instead of 3.5-foot width identified in the PAD. Please correct. Development Blocks in the Tentative Plat are identified by numerals, i.e. Block 46, Block 51, etc. However, in the La Estancia PAD document, Blocks are identified by Letters/Numerals, i.e. A1, B2, etc. For future submissions of development plans please use the same Block identification as found in the PAD for consistency and ease of review in order to better facilitate the review process and to avoid any erroneous review comments. |
| 12/21/2007 | LIZA CASTILLO | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Approved | 4350 E. Irvington Road, Tucson, AZ 85714 Post Office Box 711, Tucson, AZ 85702 WR#190760 December 19, 2007 RBF Consulting Attn: Samuel Mills 3011 W Ina Rd. Ste. 115 Tucson, AZ 85741 Dear Mr. Mills: SUBJECT: La Estancia De Tucson Phase II Blocks 1 thru 17 S07-178 Tucson Electric Power Company (TEP) has no objection to the preliminary plat submitted for review November 29, 2007. Enclosed is TEP facilities map showing the approximate location of the existing facilities.There is 3 Phase Overhead/Underground and feeder available all around the perimeter. The copy of the tentative plat showing where TEP will be placing the aboveground equipment for this subdivision will be mailed to you under separate cover. TEP will provide a preliminary electrical design on the Approved Tentative Plat within thirty (30) working days upon receipt of the plat. Additional plans necessary for preparation of the design are: building plans including water, electrical, landscape, sidewalk and paving plans. Also, submit the AutoCAD version of the plat on a CD or email to hnoriega@tep.com. Should you have any questions, please contact the area designer, Ron Grant at (520) 918- 8712. Sincerely, Henrietta Noriega Office Specialist Design/Build Hn Enclosures cc: P. Gehlen, City of Tucson (e-mail) B. Burns, La Estancia (Letter only) E. Torres/R. Grant, Tucson Electric Power |
| 12/24/2007 | GLENN HICKS | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Denied | DATE: December 21, 2007 TO: DSD_CDRC@ tucsonaz.gov FROM: Glenn Hicks Parks and Recreation 791-4873 ext. 215 Glenn.Hicks@tucsonaz.gov SUBJECT: S07-178 La Estancia De Tucson Phase II: Tentative Plat Review(11-14-07) Denied. Indicate with a note on the plat that the Parks and Recreation Department requires the design plans for the Community park to be submitted with ample to time to allow review and approval by the department, so as to allow the park construction/completion/approval prior to the issuance by the City of Tucson of the 500th final inspection permit of a residential unit in Phase I or 500th final inspection permit of a residential unit in Phase II. |