Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Plan Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Plan Number - S07-158
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 03/19/2008 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 03/26/2008 | CDRC1 | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Denied | March 25, 2008 To: Maolin Zheng BSW International Thru: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Manager City of Tucson Development Services Department ___________________________ From: Tom Porter, Sr. CEA (520-740-6579), representing the Pima County Departments of Wastewater Management and Environment Quality Subject: Walmart Store #4684-00 DP/TP - 2nd Submittal S07-158 The proposed sewer collection lines for the above-referenced project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use. 1. Sheet 4: Keynote 9 should read 8" not 10" sewer pipe. 2. Sheet 4: Provide the rim elevations for all proposed manholes and cleanouts. 2nd Request. This office will require a revised set of bluelines, and a response letter, addressing these comments. Additional comments may be made during the review of these documents. Pima County Code Title 13.20.030.A.2 requires that a wastewater review fee be paid for each submittal of the development plan. The fee for the first submittal is $166 plus $50 per sheet. For the second submittal, the review fee is $50 per sheet. For all subsequent submittals, the review fee is $39 per sheet. The next submittal of this project will be the second (2nd) submittal. A check for the review fee of this submittal in the amount of $39.00 (made out to PIMA COUNTY TREASURER) must accompany the revised set of bluelines and response letter. If the number of sheets changes, please adjust the review fee accordingly. If you have any questions regarding the above-mentioned comments, please contact me. |
| 03/28/2008 | KAY MARKS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Approved | 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 KAY MARKS ADDRESSING OFFICIAL PH: 740-6480 FAX #: 740-6370 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL SUBJECT: S07-158 WALMART STORE #4684-00/REVISED TENTATIVE PLAT DATE: March 28, 2008 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and we hereby approve this project. ***The Pima County Addressing Section can use digital CAD drawing files when submitted with your final plat Mylar. These CAD files can be submitted through Pima County Addressing. The digital CAD drawing files expedite the addressing and permitting processes when we are able to insert this digital data into the County’s Geographic Information System. Your support is greatly appreciated.*** jg |
| 04/10/2008 | GLYNDA ROTHWELL | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Denied | 4350 E. Irvington Road, Tucson, AZ 85714 Post Office Box 711, Tucson, AZ 85702 WR# 189651 April 9, 2008 BSW International Attn: Maolin Zheng 10835 N 25th Ave. Phoenix, AZ 85029 Dear Maolin Zheng: SUBJECT: WalMart Store # 4684-00 - Resubmittal S07-158 Tucson Electric Power Company (TEP) has reviewed the plan submitted March 26, 2008. TEP is unable to approve the plan at this time. There are existing electrical facilities within the boundaries of this project. Please identify all existing TEP facilities within the mapped area of the development including but not limited to overhead & underground electric lines, utility poles, and pad mounted equipment. We are unable to determine routes of existing underground lines with current plan, the line weight is too light. In order for TEP to approve the plan the facilities and easements must be depicted on the plans. Enclosed is a copy of a TEP facility map showing the approximate location of the existing facilities. All costs associated with the relocation of the facilities in conflict will be billable to the developer. Please resubmit two revised bluelines to City of Tucson Development Services Department for TEP's review. You may contact the area Designer, Steve Garcia at 917-8739 should you have any technical questions. Sincerely, Henrietta Noriega Office Specialist hn Enclosure cc: City of Tucson (by e-mail) S. Garcia, Tucson Electric Power |
| 04/10/2008 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: Wal-Mart Store #4684-00 - Tentative Plat Valencia & Alvernon S07-158 TRANSMITTAL DATE: April 10, 2008 DUE DATE: April 14, 2007 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. Section 4.1.7.1, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a tentative plat. If, at the end of that time, the tentative plat has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this tentative plat is October 18, 2008. 2. Zoning acknowledges the 10'-0" dimension shown on the plan. Please clarify the 10'-0" wide parking space adjacent to the cart corrals by either revising the dimension to read all vehicle parking spaces adjacent to the cart corral must be 10'-0" or provide a note that provides the same information. D.S. 2-05.2.4.D.3 Per D.S. 3-05.2.1.3 the proposed vehicle parking spaces next to the proposed "CART CORRAL" are required to be ten (10) foot wide. Provide dimension so that zoning can verify the width of the vehicle parking spaces next to the cart corrals. 3. The dimension shown for the height of the sign is not shown correctly. The 7'-0" dimension is from the bottom of the main sign. D.S. 2-05.2.4.D.3 Provide a detail for the proposed ADA signage for vehicle parking spaces. If the proposed signage is to be used to prevent vehicles from gaining access to the sidewalk area some type of bollard pole base is required. 4. This comment was not addressed. D.S. 2-05.2.4.D.K Based on truncated domes being shown on the sidewalk along the entire east side of the proposed building zoning will assume that the sidewalk is flush with the asphalt paving. Per D.S. 2-08.4.1 Sidewalks within a project must be physically separated from any vehicular travel lane by means of curbing, grade separation, barriers, railings, or other means, except at crosswalks. This said provide some type of physical separation for this sidewalk from the proposed parking area access lane (PAAL). 5. Provide a dimension for the landing at the top of the access ramp. D.S. 2-05.2.4.D.K The proposed curb access ramp shown at the southwest corner of the thirty-six (36) foot wide entrance/exit PAAL off of Valencia Road does not appear to have the required three (3) foot landing, see ICC/ANSI A117.1-2003 Sec 406.7, the flares do not appear to meet the 1:12 requirement. 6. This comment was not addressed. D.S. 2-05.2.4.D.P The parking calculation is not correct. 98,056/200 = 490.28 or 490 vehicle parking spaces required. Provide the required number of accessible vehicle parking spaces, include the number of van accessible vehicle parking spaces in the calculation. It appears that the number 494 spaces shown under Parking data, Total Parking, is the Total required, please clarify. 7. The proposed Class 2 bicycle parking does not meet the requirements of D.S. 2-09.4.1 Proximity to Main Entrance. Class 2 bicycle parking facilities will be located no more than 50 feet from the main building entrance(s) and will be along the front side of the building as well as along other sides of the building that have entrances. D.S. 2-05.2.4.D.Q Clearly identify the main entrance to the proposed structure so that zoning can verify that the requirements of D.S. 2-09.4.1 Proximity to Main Entrances are being met. 8. D.S. 2-05.2.4.D.K Demonstrate on the plan how the two (2) handicapped vehicle parking spaces located on the east end of the northern most handicapped vehicle parking spaces provide accessible access to the building. The access aisle stop and do not connect to an accessible route. 9. D.S. 2-05.2.4.D.Q The bicycle parking calculation shown on the plan has been changed from the first review and now is not correct. Per LUC Section 3.3.4 RETAIL TRADE USE GROUP, General Merchandise Sales, Bicycle: Eight (8) percent - fifty (50) percent Class 1 and fifty (50) percent Class 2, it appears the provided calculation is using 75% Class 1 and 25% Class 2 and the plan shows appears to show 75% Class 2 and 25% Class 1. Revise both the calculation and plan to reflect the LUC requirements. After discussions with Ron Brown, Structural Review, City of Tucson, Development Services Department in regards to the ICC/ANSI A117.1-2003 and the requirements for detectable warnings (truncated domes), it has been determined that some locations previously requiring truncated domes may no longer require them. The following comments are a direct result of these discussions. If you have any questions in regards to the requirements for truncated domes contact Ron Brown @837-4908. 10 APRIL 2008 S07-158/WAL MART STORE #4684-00 REVIEWED BY RON BROWN ACCESSIBLE REVIEW 1. PROVIDE AND IDENTIFY ACCESSIBLE ROUTE THROUGHOUT SITE TO ALL BUILDING ENTRANCES AND EXITS AND PARKING FACILITIES AND TO NEAREST PUBLIC TRANSPORATION POINT AS PER 2006 IBS SECTION 1104 AND ICC 117.1 SECTION 402. A. SHOW LOCATION OF NEAREST PUBLIC TRANSPORTAION DROP OFF POINT. B. PROVIDE SPOT GRADES OF ALL ACCESSIBLE ROUTES OR OTHER WISE SHOW SLOPE COMPLIANCE. C. INSURE ACESSIBILITY SLOPES FOR ALL SURFACES AT ENTRANCES AND PARKING AREAS, IBC 2006, SECTIONS, 1105, 1106.7 AND ICC 117.1, SECTIONS 502.5, 503, 503.4, 302 AND 303 2. NOTE 20 REFERS TO A WHOLE BUNCH OF CURB RAMPS BOTH INSIDE PRIVATE PROPERTY AND OUTSIDE IN THE PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY. COT STANDARD 207, CURB RAMPS, IS A DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION STANDARD FOR THE CITY OF TUCSON USE ONLY. THE DETAILS ARE FOR RIGHT OF WAY PROPERTY ONLY. ACCESSIBLE STANDARDS WITHIN PRIVATE PROPERTY ARE GOVERN BY THE 2006 IBC/ICC ANSI 117.1 3. PLEASE REVISE ALL CURB RAMPS WITHIN THE PRIVATE PROPERTY BOUNDARIES TO MEET ALL ANSI STANDARDS, SECTION 406. 4. THE CURB RAMP SHOWN NEAR THE CENTER VALENCIA ROAD DRIVE AT THE FIRST RAISED MARKED CROSSING APPEARS NOT TO HAVE A 4' WIDE LANDING. PLEASE PROVIDE A LARGE SCALE DETAIL FOR ALL INTERIOR CURBS RAMPS OF THIS TYPE SHOWING ALL DIMENSIONAL DETAILS AND REQUIRED ACCESSORIES, GRADES, DETACTABLE WARNINGS AND FINISHES IN COMPLIANCE WITH ANSI, SECTION 406. IN CERTAIN SITUATIONS, A SIDEWALK RAMP MAY BE MORE APPROPRIATE. 5. THE CURB RAMP AT THE MARKED CROSSING TO LOT 3 HAS NO LANDING. HERE AGAIN, A SIDEWALK RAMP MIGHT LIT THIS SITUATION BETTER THAN A FLARED CURB RAMP. 6. PLEASE PROVIDE A LARGE SCALE DETAIL OF A CURB RAMP WITH OUT THE FLARED SIDES AND A SIDE WALK RAMP SHOWING ALL DIMENSIONAL DETAILS AND REQUIRED ACCESSORIES, GRADES, DETACTABLE WARNINGS AND FINISHES IN COMPLIANCE WITH ANSI, SECTION 406. 7. PROVIDE A LARGE SCALE DETAILED PLAN OF THE ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES, SIGNAGE AND ISLE. SHOW ALL DEMINISIONS AND SIDE WALK OR CURB ACCESS RAMPS AS PER ICC 117.1; SECTION 405 AND 2006 IBC, SECTION 1010. 8. FOR BOTH MULTI SPACE ACCESSIBLE PARKING AREAS, THE ISLE BETWEEN THE PARKINGS SPACES IS TO BE CONSIDERED AS AN ACCESSIBLE ROUTE AND IS NOT TO BE LESS THAN 4' WIDE. PROVIDE A 2' DEEP DETECTABLE WARNING STRIP JUST PRIOR TO THE VEHICLE CROSSING AREA ENTRANCE. PROVIDE A DISTINCT AND CLEARLY MARKED STRIPPED COSSING ISLE TO THE CONCRETE BUILDING ENTRANCE WALK AREA. RETAIN A 2' DEEP DETECTABLE WARNING JUST AT THE END OF THE VEHICLE CROSSING AREA. 9. THE SHOWN DETECTABLE WARNING STRIP ALONG THE ENTIRE ENTRANCE RAMP AREA IS NOT AN ANSI 117.1 REQUIREMENT. IF IN EFFECT, IT WOULD BE A REQUIREMENT OF THE ADAAG. IT IS AN OWNER'S OPTION. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4956. C:\planning\cdrc\tentativeplat\S07-158tpdp-2nd.doc RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised tentative plat, and additional requested documents. |
| 04/14/2008 | ANDY STEUART | COT NON-DSD | REAL ESTATE | Approv-Cond | Request Real Estate be provided a review to the Final Plat. |
| 04/14/2008 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | Submit any revised plans for Landscape Section review. |
| 04/15/2008 | JOSE ORTIZ | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Denied | April 15, 2008 ACTIVITY NUMBER: D07-158 PROJECT NAME: Wal-Mart Store # 4684-00 PROJECT ADDRESS: 3786 E Valencia Rd PROJECT REVIEWER: Jose E. Ortiz PE, Traffic Engineer Resubmittal Required: The following comment must be addressed prior to final approval of the development plan from Traffic Engineering. 1. The first review comment # 5 has not been satisfied. Provide confirmation from Pima County that the conflicts created by the existing southbound drop lane along Alvernon will be addressed with an upcoming county project. A meeting maybe warranted with city and county staff to discuss options and time frames for the recommended improvements. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-4259 x76730 or Jose.Ortiz@tucsonaz.gov |
| 04/18/2008 | PGEHLEN1 | OTHER AGENCIES | PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS | Passed | |
| 04/18/2008 | ANDY VERA | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 04/21/2008 | TOM MARTINEZ | OTHER AGENCIES | AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION | Approved | ADOT has no comments on this submittal. The project lies within 1.5 mile from any ADOT facility and impacts will be minimal. We do have the traffic report in our files for future reference as needed. Thank you. TM (Sorry for being late...again) -------------------------------------------------------- Confidentiality and Nondisclosure Notice: This email transmission and any attachments are intended for use by the person(s)/entity(ies) named above and may contain confidential/privileged information. Any unauthorized use, disclosure or distribution is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by e-mail, and delete or destroy all copies plus attachments. |
| 04/23/2008 | GLENN HICKS | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Denied | PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT COMMENTS City of Tucson CDRC – Community Design Review Committee CASE NUMBER: S07-158 CASE NAME: Wal-Mart Store #4684-00 (Valencia/Alvernon): TP/DP Submittal #: 2 COMMENTS DUE: 4/16/08 COMMENTS SENT: 4/22/08 Items being reviewed: Development Plan/Tentative Plan (DP/TP) and Landscape Plan (LP) Related: rezoning - N/A, being developed under existing I-1 zoning land use plan(s) – General Plan Parks and Recreation Department Staff has reviewed this proposal and offers the following comments: APPROVAL POSTPONED pending completion of discussions regarding a recreational trail easement along the southern 35-feet of the site. Please address the following, and resubmit the TP/DP and LP if warranted. As per the Eastern Pima County Trail System Master Plan, and in accordance with the City’s General Plan, a regional trail is planned along the Rodeo Wash, from Valencia Road to Interstate Highway 19, including the reach south of and adjacent to this site. Staff requests dedication of a 35-foot-wide, public, non-motorized recreational trail easement to the City of Tucson along the southern 35 feet of the site. There is no requirement to build the trail now, and the WASH Ordinance requirements will not be triggered by the dedication. Staff is attempting to secure the easement to allow for future construction of the trail. If the owner/developer is agreeable, the easement is to be shown on the TP/DP and LP (including the docket/page reference on the TP/DP) and a general explanatory note added for clarification purposes. Please call Joanne Hershenhorn at 791-4505 if you wish to discuss the above. REVIEWED BY: Joanne Hershenhorn DATE: 4/22/08 PARKS_AND_RECREATION_DEPT\REVIEW_COMMENTS\CDRC_Cases\2008_ReviewsS07-158_Wal_Mart_Val_Alv.doc |
| 06/04/2008 | PAUL MACHADO | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | To: Patricia Gehlen DATE: June 4, 2008 CDRC/Zoning Manager FROM: Paul Machado Engineering Division SUBJECT: Wal-mart Store, 3786 E. Valencia Road Tentative Plat S07-158 (Second Review) T15S, R14E, Section 16 RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: None. Tentative Plat: 1. Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the TP. 2. All easement of record must be graphically shown on the plan together with recording docket and page per D.S. 2-02.2.1.20. An easement is required for the portion of the entrance that is encroaching onto the property to the west. Provide documentation when the easement is recorded. 3. Please show the proposed roof drainage patterns, 100% of the 10-year flow must be conveyed under the sidewalks including any other site drainage as well. Please provide supporting calculations to demonstrate compliance with D.S. 3-01.4.4. If the location(s) of the roof scuppers have not yet been decided, a general note indicating sidewalk scuppers will be used when the roof scuppers locations have been designed and located will suffice. Include a note indicating any drainage will be conveyed with sidewalk scuppers. Drainage Report: 1. The DR has been accepted for Tentative Plat purposes only. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 837-4932 or Paul.Machado@tucsonaz.govs Paul P. Machado Senior Engineering Associate City of Tucson/Development Services Department 201 N. Stone Avenue P.O. Box 27210 Tucson, Arizona 85726-7210 (520) 837-4932 office (520) 879-8010 fax C:/3786 E. Valencia Rd_CDRC_2 |
| 06/06/2008 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES June 6, 2008 Maolin Zheng BSW International, Inc. 10835 North 25th Avenue Phoenix, Arizona 85029 Subject: S07-158 Wal-Mart Store #4684-00 Tentative Plat Dear Maolin: Your submittal of March 19, 2007 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a DETAILED cover letter explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLACKLINES MUST BE FOLDED 7 Copies Revised Tentative Plat (Zoning, TEP, Landscape, Wastewater, Traffic, Parks and Recreation, DSD) 4 Copies Revised Landscape Plan (Zoning, Landscape, Parks and Recreation, DSD) Should you have any questions, please call me at 837-4919. Sincerely, Patricia Gehlen CDRC Manager All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: (602) 567-2560 |