Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Plan Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Plan Number - S07-121
Review Name: TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 08/09/2007 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 08/09/2007 | FRODRIG2 | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Denied | August 8, 2007 To: Stephanie Rowe Reece Angell Rowe Architects Thru: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Manager City of Tucson Development Services Department ___________________________ From: Tom Porter, Sr. CEA (520-740-6579), representing the Pima County Departments of Wastewater Management and Environment Quality Subject: Casa Del Pueblo Expansion Tent. Plat - 1st Submittal S07-121 The proposed sewer collection lines for the above-referenced project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use. Per written guidance provided by the PCWMD Development Services Section, sufficient conveyance and treatment capacity exists in the downstream public sewerage system for this small project, and a formal capacity response letter from the PCWMD will not be required for this small project. All Sheets: Show the jurisdiction’s case number, S07-121, in or near the title block of each sheet. This case number should be shown larger and bolder than any associated cross-reference numbers. Sheet 2: Show the public and private sewer lines using different line-types, so that they can readily be distinguished from each other. Also, show and describe examples of these different line types in the legend on Sheet 2. Also show different line types for existing vs. proposed. Sheet 1: If all sewer on site is existing and that none is proposed (but how would lot 2 be sewered?) revise Wastewater Management Note #1 to read as follows: THE ON-SITE SEWERS ARE EXISTING AND PRIVATE. NO NEW SEWERS ARE PROPOSED. Sheet 1: If the sewer is existing and none are proposed then eliminate Wastewater Management Note #2 otherwise revise it to read as follows: THE ON-SITE SANITARY SEWERS WILL BE PRIVATE AND WILL BE CONSTRUCTED, OPERATED AND MAINTAINED ON A PRIVATE BASIS, AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH AN APPROVED OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE PLAN, IF REQUIRED. THE LOCATION AND METHOD OF CONNECTION TO AN EXISTING PUBLIC SANITARY SEWER IS SUBJECT TO REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE PIMA COUNTY WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT. Sheet 1: Add a General Note that states: THIS PROJECT WILL HAVE ______ EXISTING AND______ PROPOSED WASTEWATER FIXTURE UNIT EQUIVALENTS PER TABLE 13.20.045(E)(1) IN PIMA COUNTY CODE 13.20.045(E). And fill in the blanks with the appropriate values. Sheet 2: All public sewer elements (manholes and sewer mains), that are located on this project or are less than 100’ from this project, are identified with the wastewater plan and IMS numbers. The IMS numbers are the sewer element identification numbers that can be found on the PCWMD Maps and Records (5th floor) basemaps or on PCWMD and PCDOT MapGuide internet websites. Also include the rim and invert elevations for the public manholes. Sheet 2: The manholes and cleanouts on site should be labeled as private and include the rim and invert elevations. The private manholes should be numbered in sequence with the furthest downstream manhole being the lowest numbered. Sheet 2: Where the sewer line goes to the existing building this should be labeled as BCS. The slope/size/length and material of pipe should also be shown. Also the sewer line segments between manholes and cleanouts should be labeled with slope/length/size and material of pipe for each section. Sheet 2: How the proposed building on Lot 2 is to be sewered should be shown on plan. Sheet 2: If it is the intention to split the lot and possibly sell it then a joint use agreement for the private sewer line would be required. This office will require a revised set of bluelines, and a response letter, addressing these comments. Additional comments may be made during the review of these documents. Pima County Code Title 13.20.030.A.2 requires that a wastewater review fee be paid for each submittal of the tentative or preliminary plat. The fee for the first submittal is $166 plus $50 per sheet. For the second submittal, the review fee is $50 per sheet. For all subsequent submittals, the review fee is $39 per sheet. The next submittal of this project will be the second (2nd) submittal. A check for the review fee of this submittal in the amount of $100.00 (made out to PIMA COUNTY TREASURER) must accompany the revised set of bluelines and response letter. If the number of sheets changes, please adjust the review fee accordingly. If you have any questions regarding the above-mentioned comments, please contact me. |
| 08/16/2007 | FRODRIG2 | OTHER AGENCIES | PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS | Approved | ADOT has NO COMMENT on this project S07-121 REECE ANGELL ROWE ARCHITECTS CASA DEL PUEBLO -------------------------------------------------------- Confidentiality and Nondisclosure Notice: This email transmission and any attachments are intended for use by the person(s)/entity(ies) named above and may contain confidential/privileged information. Any unauthorized use, disclosure or distribution is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by email, and delete or destroy all copies plus attachments. |
| 08/28/2007 | JIM EGAN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Denied | No special backflow preventer is required on the riser. Only the sprinkler check valve. Show the existing hydrant locations. It appears one will be blocked by the new building in between the hydrant and the existing fire lane. |
| 08/29/2007 | KAY MARKS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Denied | 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 KAY MARKS ADDRESSING OFFICIAL PH: 740-6480 FAX #: 740-6370 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL SUBJECT: S07-121 CASA DEL PUEBLO/TENTATIVE PLAT DATE: August 29, 2007 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and the following matters must be resolved prior to our approval: Correct Location Map scale. Delete Olive Annapolis on Location Map. Add Road to Irvington and Avenue to Liberty on Location Map. Delete address. Title Block should be located in the lower right hand corner with lot numbers and resubdivision information. jg |
| 08/29/2007 | FRODRIG2 | COT NON-DSD | REAL ESTATE | Approved | >>> Andy Steuart 08/28/2007 2:04 PM >>> S07-121 Casa del Pueblo: Tentative Plat Review - No comment |
| 08/31/2007 | LIZA CASTILLO | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Approved | 4350 E. Irvington Road, Tucson, AZ 85714 Post Office Box 711, Tucson, AZ 85702 WR#186385 August 31, 2006 Reece Angell Rowe Architects Attn: Stephanie Rowe 4343 E Avalon Dr. Phoenix, Arizona 85018 Dear Ms. Rowe : SUBJECT: Casa del Pueblo S07-121 Tucson Electric Power Company has reviewed and approved the development plan submitted August 9, 2007. It appears that there are no conflicts with the existing facilities within the boundaries of this proposed development Enclosed is a copy of a TEP facilities map showing the approximate location of the existing facilities. Any relocation costs will be billable to the customer. In order to apply for electric service, call the New Construction Department at (520) 918-8300. Submit a final set of plans including approved site, electrical load, paving off-site improvements and irrigation plans, if available include a CD with the AutoCAD version of the plans. If easements are required, they will be secured by separate instrument. Your final plans should be sent to: Tucson Electric Power Company Attn: Ms. Mary Boice New Business Project Manager P. O. Box 711 (DB-101) Tucson, AZ 85702 520-917-8732 Should you have any technical questions, please call the area Designer Mike Kaiser at (520) 918-8244. Sincerely, Elizabeth Miranda Office Support Specialist Design/Build lm Enclosures cc: DSD_CDRC@tucsonaz.gov, City of Tucson (email) M. Kaiser, Tucson Electric Power |
| 09/04/2007 | JOSE ORTIZ | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Approved | |
| 09/06/2007 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1) A Development Plan is required. C9-84-23 2) A Landscape and Native Plant Preservation Plan is required. 3) The Development Plan and Landscape Plan are required to include all items listed in the conditions of rezoning. C9-84-23 |
| 09/10/2007 | TOM MARTINEZ | OTHER AGENCIES | AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION | Passed | |
| 09/10/2007 | PGEHLEN1 | TUCSON WATER NEW AREA DEVELOPMENT | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 09/11/2007 | HEATHER THRALL | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Heather Thrall Senior Planner PROJECT: S07-121 Casa del Pueblo, 4975 S. Liberty Avenue Tentative plat, 1 lot into 2 lots 1st review TRANSMITTAL DATE: September 7, 2007 DUE DATE: September 7, 2007 COMMENTS: 1. Section 4.1.7.1, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a tentative plat. If, at the end of that time, the tentative plat has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this tentative plat is August 8, 2008. 2. This project was reviewed for compliance with the Land Use Code (LUC), Development Standard (DS), American National Standard Institute (ANSI), and International Building Code 2006 (IBC). This project is not only showing the lot split via the tentative plat process, it is also, in essence, shows the development that is proposed, which is a development plan. The project was reviewed for content required under DS 2-03 and DS 2-05. Due to the apparent greater than 25% expansion of building area, this plan was reviewed for full code compliance of the entire site. 3. Per DS 2-03.2.1.D/2-05.2.1.D - regarding location map on sheet 1: A) list recorded subdivisions by name, book and page under the map B) add the township, range and section numbers of adjacent sections 4. Per DS 2-03.2.1.G - provide a title block in the lower right corner of the first page of the plat. Include the following: A) name of subdivision B) number of lots proposed C) case number S07-121 D) indicate that this project is both a tentative plat and a development plan 5. Per DS 2-03.2.2.B.5 - the plan references to two uses: as a residential care service, and a multi-family development. These are two separate, individual uses. The zoning administration division issued a letter for this project advising the applicability of multi-family development designators. Staff has reviewed this development as a multi-family development. If there is a change to make this project a residential care service, please clarify that in a response letter (specifying exactly what activities are occurring on the property to classify it as a residential care service) and know that further review comments, and different development designators are applicable. 6. Per DS 2-03.2.3.C- ensure all easements are on the plat - with type and recordation information added where applicable. 7. Per DS 2-03.2.3.H, regarding significant existing site conditions: A) the plans are difficult to read due to the line weights - lot lines and building lines - and parking/PAAL lines all appear to be similar line weights. Please change the line weights to reflect the different data and adjust the legend accordingly. B) The existing patio should be labeled as "porch" to infer a roof, as existing 8. Per DS 2-02.2.4.D, provide the zoning of the adjacent surrounding parcels as: A) zoned O-3 to the north (remove reference to O-1 and O-2) B) zoned C-1 to the east C) zoned C-1 to the south 9. Per DS 2-03.2.4.E, clarify if the project is going to be phased. 10. Per DS 2-05.2.2.B.4, list the total number of units: A) existing, B) proposed C) existing for each zone D) proposed for each zone E) (I acknowledge the overall number of 105 units listed is in the parking notes.) 11. Per DS 2-05.2.2.B.5, regarding lot coverage - 75% of the land area in each zone can be covered (lot coverage refers to vehicular use areas and building square footage) A) clarify lot coverage percentage for each zone - both permitted and proposed listed B) clarify overall lot coverage for entire site- both permitted and proposed listed 12. Per DS 2-05.2.4.D.3, regarding Parking Area Access Lanes (PAALs); A) dimension all existing and proposed PAAL widths and entries/exits B) call out curbing with keynote 13. Per DS 2-05.2.4.D.4, provide a cross-access and cross parking agreement between the two properties to ensure continued access and parking is maintained, even if the parcels are sold to new owners. A lot combination covenant indicating the sites shall function as one is required to be recorded as well. Please provide the recordation information for all three documents, and list "docket _____ page _____" with a note of each agreement recorded on the map page. 14. Per DS 2-05.2.4.I, regarding setbacks: A) show building setbacks between new lot line and existing building B) show building setbacks between new lot line and proposed building C) show building setbacks between existing lot lines and proposed building D) show building setbacks between existing lot lines and existing building E) for a multi-family residential use in the O-3 zone, abutting an O-3 zone, the minimum required building setback between the new lot line and both the old and new buildings is equal to the building wall height. The proposed lot line provides an insufficient setback between both old and new buildings, given the building walls are two story and the setbacks scales to 9'/10' respectively. Re-design or acknowledge that a Design Development Option (DDO) is to be applied for/obtained to keep the reduced setbacks. F) A proposed covered walkway or hallway is shown straddling the new lot line. Given the above setbacks for the O-3 for a multi-family use, the hallway is not permitted. 15. Per DS 2-05.2.4.K, regarding pedestrian circulation: A) per DS 2-08.4.1.A, provide a clear continuous pedestrian connection from Liberty to the buildings on the site (it may be there, it's too hard to see on my drawing) B) per DS 2-08.4.1.B, a 5' wide pedestrian refuge area, inclusive of a 4' wide sidewalk is required between the new PAAL and existing building - ensure physically separated C) per DS 2-08.5.1.A, call out the widths of all sidewalks, existing and proposed D) per ANSI ch. 4,5 and 7 - provide disabled access ramps at a slope not greater than 1:12 where applicable. Keynote on plan and provide a detail drawing. E) Per ANSI Ch. 705.5 - provide truncated domes on access ramps where transitioning from pedestrian to vehicular use area. Call out on detail of disabled access ramp. F) Be advised, wheel stop barriers may be required in parking spaces to prevent vehicle overhang from reducing sidewalk to less than 4' wide G) Are there any gates on the pedestrian pathways where intersecting near the stairwells and if so - ensure 4' wide clear per DS 2-08.5.1.A 16. Per DS 2-05.2.4.M, provide square footage of all buildings. 17. Per DS 2-05.2.4.N. dimension footprints of all structures for issuance of building permits. 18. Per DS 2-05.2.4.N, provide height of all structures as follows: A) measure from grade to top of all walls B) measure from grade to midpoint of pitch roof and ridge top - if applicable-specify C) measure from grade to flat roof and top of parapet - if applicable - specify 19. Per DS 2-05.2.4.O - note that loading zones are not required for residential uses, but if there is a different classification proposed on the resubmittal, loading zones may be applicable. 20. Per DS 2-05.2.4.P, regarding parking: A) dimension both regular and disabled access parking spaces in a typical detail drawing B) wheel stops may be required if vehicle overhang reduces sidewalk less than 4' wide C) list total parking spaces provided and total number of units proposed in parking calcs D) list total disabled parking spaces - including van accessible - in parking calculation E) give typical detail of handicapped parking signage to be posted at parking spaces 21. Per DS 2-05.2.4.Q, regarding bicycle parking: A) List bicycle parking calculation per LUC 3.3.4. Eight percent (8%) of the total number of vehicle parking spaces provided is the required amount of bicycle parking spaces for the project. Of that total number of required bicycle parking, 50% shall be class 1 (locker type) and 50% shall be class 2 (rack type). B) Provide typical detail drawing for class 1 and class 2 bicycle parking spaces C) Note that class 2 bicycle parking must be located within 50' of the entrance to both buildings, per DS 2-09.4.1 D) Keynote locations of both types of bicycle parking 22. Per DS 2-05.2.4.R, show sight visibility triangles. 23. Per DS 2-05.2.4.V, show location and type of postal service. 24. Per DS 2-05.2.4.W., show location of any proposed free-standing lighting and signage with heights and pole base width. 25. Provide percentage of expansion calculation - show square footages and percentages of gross floor area expansion. 26. Please note that further review comments may be forthcoming, depending upon responses provided. I may be reached at Heather.Thrall@tucsonaz.gov or at 520-837-4951 if there are any questions on this review. C:\planning\cdrc\tentativeplat\S07-121 casa del pueblo 1.tpa.doc RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised tentative plat and additional requested documents. |
| 09/13/2007 | ED ABRIGO | PIMA COUNTY | ASSESSOR | Approved | Office of the Pima County Assessor 115 N. Church Ave. Tucson, Arizona 85701 BILL STAPLES ASSESSOR TO: CDRC Office Subdivision Review City of Tucson (FAX# 791-5559) FROM: Gary Ault, Mapping Supervisor Pima County Assessor's Office Mapping Department DATE: Sept. 6, 2007 RE: Assessor's Review and Comments Regarding Tentative Plat S07-121 CASA DEL PUEBLO T151301 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * x Plat meets Assessor's Office requirements. _______ Plat does not meet Assessor's Office requirements. COMMENTS: PLEASE MAKE THE FOLLOWING ADJUSTMENTS BY FINAL PLAT STAGE: 1. The title block must be located in the lower right corner of the plat. It must contain the number of lots, common areas, if any, the section, township and range and the name, map and plat of the original subdivision if the present subdivision is being resubdivided out of it. 2. Add dimensions for the building and a tie line to the perimeter. THANK YOU FOR YOUR SUBMITTAL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS PLEASE CALL ROSANNA WERNER AT 740-4390 NOTE: THE ASSESSOR'S CURRENT INVOLVEMENT IN PROCESSING ITS MANUAL MAPS TO DIGITAL FORMAT IS EXPEDITED GREATLY BY EXCHANGE OF DIGITAL DATA. IN THE COURSE OF RECORDING THIS SUBDIVISION YOUR ASSISTANCE IN PROVIDING THIS OFFICE WITH AN AUTOCAD COPY WOULD BE GREATLY APPRECIATED. THANK YOU FOR ANY DIGITAL DATA PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED. Susan King |
| 09/13/2007 | ANDY VERA | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Identify refuse/recycle enclosures on DP, new or existing. 2. Include refuse/recycle enclosure detail. Refer to DS 6-01.0 A. Provide a minimum 10 ft x 10 ft inside clear svc area between the rear and side wall protectors and the front gates. DS 6-01.4.1.B & 6-01.4.1.C.2 B. Gates must be equipped with the ability to be secured in the open and closed positions. DS 6-01.4.2.C.4. Demonstrate and annotate, " positive locking with (Bayonet) anchors, qty-4, 1 in. dia. x 6 in. long galvanized pipe flush with concrete." Recommend designing gates to open a minimum of 180 degrees. Please correct on resubmittal. |
| 09/13/2007 | ROGER HOWLETT | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Approved | DEPARTMENT OF URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN COMMENTS Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT S07-121 Casa Del Pueblo (XXXX) Tentative Plat ( ) Development Plan (XXXX) Landscape Plan ( ) Revised Plan/Plat ( ) Board of Adjustment ( ) Other CROSS REFERENCE: C9-84-23 NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: 12th Avenue/Valencia GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: COMMENTS DUE BY: 09/07/07 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: (XXXX) No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment ( ) Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions ( ) RCP Proposal Complies with Plan Policies ( ) See Additional Comments Attached ( ) No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: ( ) Resubmittal Required: ( ) Tentative Plat ( ) Development Plan ( ) Landscape Plan ( ) Other REVIEWER: drcorral 791-4505 DATE: 09/11/07 |
| 09/14/2007 | GLENN HICKS | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Approved | DATE: September 14, 2007 TO: DSD_CDRC@ tucsonaz.gov FROM: Glenn Hicks Parks and Recreation 791-4873 ext. 215 Glenn.Hicks@tucsonaz.gov SUBJECT: S07-121 Casa Del Pueblo: Tentative Plat Review(8-9-07) Staff has no comments. |
| 09/20/2007 | JASON GREEN | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | DATE: September 20, 2007 SUBJECT: Casa Del Pueblo Development Plan- Engineering Review TO: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Manager LOCATION: 4975 S Liberty Avenue, T15S R13E Sec01 Ward 5 REVIEWERS: Jason Green, CFM ACTIVITY: S07-121 (Tentative Plat) SUMMARY: Engineering Division of Development Services Department has received and reviewed the proposed Tentative Plat, Drainage Report (Patterson Hydrology Drainage Engineering, Inc., 20JUN07), and Title Report. Engineering Division does not recommend approval of the Tentative Plat at this time. The Drainage Report was reviewed for Tentative Plat purposes only. The following items need to be addressed: TENTATIVE PLAT COMMENTS: The proposed project falls under both Tentative Plat DS Sec 2-03) and Development Plan (DS Sec.2-05) requirements. The project is showing a lot split via the Tentative Plat process, but is also showing the development of the property, which is in essence a Development Plan review. The project was reviewed for conformance with the content requirements under DS 2-03 and 2-05. Due to the 25% expansion of building area and vehicular use area this plan was reviewed for full code compliance of the entire site. 1) DS Sec.2-03.2.1.D.2: Revise the project location map on Sheet 1 to identify conditions within the square mile area shown, such as subdivisions adjacent to the site. Reference recorded subdivision plats by book and page numbers. 2) DS Sec.2-03.2.1.D.3: Revise the project location map on Sheet 1 to include all adjacent section corners that must be clearly labeled on the location map. 3) DS 2-03.2.1.G.2: Revise the title block to show the proposed number of lots. 4) DS 2-03.2.1.G.3: Revise the Title Block to provide a statement as to if the project is a resubdivision. On a resubdivision provide the recordation information of the existing subdivision plat. 5) DS Sec.2-03.2.2.B.1: The correct Tentative Plat number (S07-121) may be added to the lower right hand corner of the plans, if applicable add any rezoning case numbers (C9-) or annexation case numbers (C15-). 6) DS Sec.2-03.2.3.C: Revise the Tentative plat to reflect all existing easements with recordation information, location, widths, and purpose. Specifically per the Title report verify the location of Item #5. 7) DS Sec.2-03.2.3.D: Revise the Tentative Plat to show the following information regarding the existing public right-of-way for Liberty Avenue. Label recordation data and state whether the road is public or private. 8) DS Sec.2-03.2.4.A: Provide the recordation information with the approved lot split for the subject parcel. All lot splits must be approved prior to Tentative Plat/Development Plan approval. Provide the cross-access cross parking (if applicable) agreement required for the proposed PAAL and vehicular use area of the proposed building. 9) DS Sec.2-03.2.4.C: Revise the Tentative Plat to ensure that each common area is labeled individually with a separate letter designation and is enclosed with a solid line to clarify each common area (vehicular use area, PAALs, Retention Basins (water harvesting areas)) that will have separate restrictions and/or a separate homeowners' association. Revise the line weights to differentiate between the common areas, building envelope, lot lines, topography and/or property boundaries. Provide Covenant, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&R's) for the project stating maintenance responsibilities for these areas. 10) DS Sec.2-03.2.4.F: Revise the Tentative Plat to reflect the corrections required under the proposed conditions: a) Revise the Tentative Plat to label and dimension the 18-feet radii concrete curbs per City of Tucson/Pima County Standard Detail 213 (PC/COT SD 213) at the existing and proposed driveway entrances. The curbs should be constructed at the edge of pavement, which must also be depicted on the site plan. Curb returns must be constructed entirely within the subject parcel. Refer to DS Sec.3-01.3.2.C and the Transportation Access Management Guidelines for street development standards. b) Revise the Tentative Plat to show that all existing and proposed handicap access ramps meet the design requirements per ANSI Standards A117.1-2003 Section 406.13. Provide details or keynotes that label truncated domes at all transitions from pedestrian circulation to vehicular circulation. c) Revise the Tentative Plat to show the required Sight Visibility Triangles (SVTs) per DS Sec.3-01.5.0. Revise the landscape plan to reflect the SVTs shown on the Tentative Plat. d) Revise the Tentative Plat to show the required pedestrian circulation path that is required to connect the proposed building and vehicular use area to the existing sidewalk along Liberty Ave. Label and dimension all pedestrian circulation paths. e) Revise the Tentative Plat to show the required pedestrian circulation path that is required between all existing and proposed buildings. Label and dimension all pedestrian circulation paths. f) Revise the Tentative Plat to show the location of all scuppers proposed under all sidewalks per the drainage report. Provide separate details for the scuppers showing either the standard detail number for public improvements or provide the dimensions to meet the requirements of the Drainage Report in order to convey the 10-year flow under the pedestrian circulation. 11) DS Sec.2-03.2.4.J: Revise the Tentative Plat to show that all proposed easements (utility, sewer, drainage, access, etc.) are dimensioned and labeled as to their purpose and whether they will be public or private. The proposed sewer line needs to be placed in an easement or clearly delineated within a common area and the Title Block must be updated to reflect the changes. Provide the location of any proposed utility easements. 12) DS Sec.2-03.2.4.K: A geotechnical evaluation needs to be submitted for review, addressing the following: a) Soils report should provide conformance with DS section 10-02.14.2.6 regarding 30-foot boring for the proposed retention systems, and provide discussion of potential for hydro-collapsible soils and any recommendation for setbacks from building to proposed high water elevation of the retention systems. b) The soils report shall provide identification / assessment of any potentially hazardous geotechnical areas, and state any geotechnical recommendations and whether there are special provisions for the soil preparation for this development. c) Provide slope stability recommendations for any proposed constructed slopes. d) Provide pavement structure design recommendations. e) Provide infiltration rates for detention/retention design. The infiltration tests will be required to assure that the system drains within the required time limit of 12-hours. 13) DS Sec.2-03.2.4.L.2: Revise the water-harvesting areas shown in plan view to be depressed a minimum 6-inches (not maximum 6-inches) per the City of Tucson Water Harvesting Guidance Manual, Ordinance # 10210. Refer to this manual for recommendation on how to construct and maintain the required water harvesting areas that are being used as retention basins. 14) DS Sec.2-03.2.4.L.4: Provide spot elevations in the swale at the inlet to the proposed scuppers under the existing sidewalk to ensure positive drainage towards the scupper inlet. 15) DS Sec.2-10.3.2.E: Provide a copy of the CC&R's discussing responsibility and maintenance of all vehicular use areas, PAALs, common areas and retention/detention basins. 16) DS Sec.10-02.14.3.2: Provide a note on the Tentative Plat stating that, (a) the owner or owners shall be solely responsible for operation, maintenance, and liability for drainage structures and retention/detention basins; (b) that the owner or owners shall have an Arizona Registered Professional Civil Engineer prepare a certified inspection report for the drainage and detention/retention facilities at lease once each year, and that these regular inspection reports will be on file with the owner for review by City staff, upon written request; (c) that City staff may periodically inspect the drainage and retention/detention facilities to verify that scheduled and unscheduled maintenance activities are being performed adequately; and (d) that the owner or owners agree to reimburse the City for any and all costs associated with the maintaining of the drainage and detention/retention facilities, should the City find the owner or owners deficient in their obligation to adequately operate and maintain their facilities." DEVELOPMENT PLAN: 17) DS Sec.2-05.2.1.D: Revise the project location map on Sheet 1 to include alladjacent section corners that must be clearly labeled on the location map. 18) DS Sec.2-05.2.1.K: If applicable add any rezoning case numbers (C9-) or annexation case numbers (C15-) to the development plan. 19) DS Sec.2-05.2.1.K: The correct Development Plan number (D07-XXXX) may be added to the lower right hand corner of the plan on all sheets. 20) DS Sec.2-05.2.2.C: Provide the following Drainage Note on the Development Plan; "Drainage will remain in it's natural state and will not be altered, disturbed, or obstructed other than as shown on this development plan." 21) DS Sec.2-05.2.2.D.2: Provide the following Street and Roads Note on the Development Plan; "No structure or vegetation shall be located or maintained so as to interfere with the sight visibility triangles in accordance with the Development Standard 3-01.0." 22) DS Sec.2-05.2.3.B: Verify that all easements as shown on the submitted Title Report are drawn with recordation information, location, width, and purpose of on the Development Plan. Specifically Item #5. 23) DS Sec.2-03.2.3.C: Revise the Development Plan to provide the recordation information for the shown right-of-way of Liberty Avenue. Label as public or private. 24) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.A: Provide the recordation information with the approved lot split for the subject parcel. All lot splits must be approved prior to Tentative Plat/Development Plan approval. 25) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.D.3: Revise the Development Plan to show wheel stop barrier for the parking spaces located along any adjacent pedestrian circulation paths. The barriers are to be set at 15.5-feet to accommodate the required 2.5-foot overhang to prevent encroachment or damage to the required clear 4-foot pedestrian path. 26) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.D.3: Depict and label the 18-feet radii concrete curbs per City of Tucson/Pima County Standard Detail 213 (PC/COT SD 213) at all of the driveway entrances. The curbs should be constructed at the edge of pavement, which must also be depicted on the Development Plan. Curb returns must be constructed entirely within the subject parcel. 27) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.D.3: Verify that the Development Plan reflects handicap access ramps with truncated domes (see ANSI 705.5. for design criteria) at all existing and proposed handicap ramp location. Please refer to this standard and the figures provided for additional curb access ramps requirements. 28) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.D.3: Verify that the proposed PAAL meet the minimum 24-foot width requirement. Dimension the PAAL, specifically at the PAAL curvatures, adjacent to the parking spaces, and at the PAAL termination. 29) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.D.4: Provide the cross-access and cross parking (if applicable) easement agreement required for the proposed PAAL and vehicular use area of the proposed building. If private easements are utilized protective covenants establishing the right of access is required. 30) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.G: Provide the location of all proposed utilities and provide any applicable easements for sewer, electric, water, gas, etc. 31) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.H: Provide a cross section with details for the existing wall located upstream of the proposed scuppers. The detail should clearly show wall openings to allow the water to drain from the swale into the scuppers. All wall openings will require supporting hydraulic information to verify that the wall is designed to prevent encroachment and/or cause adverse impacts to the subject property. 32) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.I: Provide the dimensions for the retention basins/water harvesting areas that are shown on the Development Plan. Provide cross sections for all retention basin areas. 33) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.I: The proposed retention basins and drainage exhibit must meet the requirements within DS Sec.10-01.4.3.1. All basins must be designed with curvilinear shapes or with a minimum 10-foot radius curves at all 90 degree bends. 34) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.K: Provide a continuous pedestrian circulation path that connects all public access areas of the existing and proposed buildings and the sidewalk area located on Liberty Avenue. Both buildings must also be connected with a pedestrian circulation path. Per DS Sec.2-08 sidewalks are to be flood free for all storm discharges of up to a ten (10) year flood, provide a revised Drainage Report showing calculations, sizing and a detail for all sidewalk scuppers along the pedestrian circulation paths located adjacent to the buildings. 35) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.K: Revise the site plan to show the minimum distance of 5-feet for a pedestrian refuge that must be maintained between any enclosed structure and the proposed PAAL. The pedestrian circulation is required to be a minimum 4-foot wide and set back 1-foot from the PAAL and must be physically separated from the PAAL with curbing or 6" raised concrete sidewalk. Per DS 3-05.2.2.B.1 provide this circulation on the north side of the existing building. 36) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.P: Provide a detail for all proposed parking spaces. A typical parking space detail shall be provided for both standard parking spaces and those for the physically disabled. Refer to DS Sec.3-05 for design criteria for parking spaces and access. 37) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.R: Revise the Development Plan to provide for the SVTs per DS Sec.3-01.5.0. Revise the landscape plan to reflect the SVTs shown on the Development Plan. 38) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.T: Provide the detail dimensions for both refuse containers, the enclosures must have a minimum inside clear dimension of 10 feet by 10 feet between the steel bollards that are required between the container and the enclosure's rear and sidewall. The inside clear dimensions must be shown from the face of the wall protectors. Refer to DS Sec.6-01.4.2 for specifications and requirements on access, placement of containers, bin enclosure and construction. 39) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.T: Show maneuverability for the refuse vehicles in plan view. Label and show the turning radii. Specifically show how the refuse vehicle turns around within the development in order to get back to Liberty Avenue. As shown the refuse vehicle would have to make a 3-4 point turn in order to get turned around, this is not acceptable per DS 6-01, refer to Environmental Services comments. 40) DS Sec.11-01.2.1: Provide estimated cut and fill quantities on the Development Plan for grading plan purposes. 41) DS Sec.11-01.9: Revise the grading plan to provide cross sections at all property boundaries to verify that the required 2-feet setback from property lines to the proposed limits of grading and proposed retention basins/water harvesting areas fill slopes have been met. Provide sufficient room to allow for the 2-feet setback from property lines to top of and toe of fill slopes. 42) DS Sec.10-02.14.3.2: Provide a note on the Development Plan stating that, (a) the owner or owners shall be solely responsible for operation, maintenance, and liability for drainage structures and retention/detention basins; (b) that the owner or owners shall have an Arizona Registered Professional Civil Engineer prepare a certified inspection report for the drainage and detention/retention facilities at lease once each year, and that these regular inspection reports will be on file with the owner for review by City staff, upon written request; (c) that City staff may periodically inspect the drainage and retention/detention facilities to verify that scheduled and unscheduled maintenance activities are being performed adequately; and (d) that the owner or owners agree to reimburse the City for any and all costs associated with the maintaining of the drainage and detention/retention facilities, should the City find the owner or owners deficient in their obligation to adequately operate and maintain their facilities." 43) Review and approval from TDOT Permits and Codes for all improvements within the public right-of-way will be required. A right-of-way use permit application will be required prior to construction. Refer to the following links for TDOT Forms and applications: a) http://www.tucsonaz.gov/dsd/Forms_Fees___Maps/Applications/applications.html / b) http://www.dot.ci.tucson.az.us/engineering/pia.php c) Or contact Steve Tineo at 741-3115 for all additional questions regarding r-o-w. DRAINAGE REPORT: 44) DS Sec. 3-01.4.4.F: Provide a revised Drainage Report showing calculations that demonstrate that the 10-year flood flow is contained under the sidewalk at all scupper concentration points (including the pedestrian circulation paths adjacent to the building). Provide details and dimensions in plan view for the scuppers on the proposed Development Plan. 45) DS Sec.10-02.2.3.1.5.B: Provide supporting hydraulic information to verify that the existing wall is design to prevent encroachment and/or cause adverse impacts to the subject property. Provide a cross section with details for the existing wall located upstream of the proposed scuppers. The detail should clearly show wall openings to allow the water to drain from the swale into the scuppers. GEOTECHNICAL REPORT: 46) DS Sec.10-02.14.2.6: A geotechnical evaluation needs to be submitted for review, addressing the following: a) Soils report should provide conformance with DS section 10-02.14.2.6 regarding 30-foot boring for the proposed retention systems, and provide discussion of potential for hydro-collapsible soils and any recommendation for setbacks from building to proposed retention systems. b) The soils report shall provide identification / assessment of any potentially hazardous geotechnical areas, and state any geotechnical recommendations and whether there are special provisions for the soil preparation for this development. c) Provide slope stability recommendations for any proposed constructed slopes. d) Provide pavement structure design recommendations. e) Provide infiltration rates for detention/retention design. GRADING PLAN: 47) DS Sec.11-01.2.1: A grading permit may be required for this project depending on the cut and fill quanitties provided. A grading plan and a grading permit application will be required after Development Plan approval and prior to any construction activity. A grading permit may not be issued prior to Development Plan approval. 48) Please ensure that any future grading plan will be consistent with the Development Plan, Drainage Report, and geotechnical report. Grading standards may be accessed at: http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/DevStandsTOC.pdf 49) Arizona Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (AZPDES) requirements may be applicable to this project. Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plans (SWPPP) and text addressing stormwater controls for all areas affected by construction activities related to this development might be required with a grading plan submittal. For further information, visit www.adeq.state.az.us/environ/water/permits/stormwater.html. GENERAL COMMENTS: Please provide a revised Tentative Plat/Development Plan, a revised Drainage Report, and a geotechnical report that address the comments provided above. Include a comprehensive response letter addressing in detail responses to all of the above comments. Further comments may be generated upon resubmittal of the Tentative Plat/Development Plan, Drainage Report, and geotechnical report reviews. For any questions, or to schedule a meeting call me at 837-4929. Jason Green, CFM Senior Engineer Associate Engineering Division Development Services |
| 09/20/2007 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES September 20, 2007 Stephanie Rowe Reece Angell Rowe Architects 4343 East Avalon Dr. Phoenix, Arizona 85018 Subject: S07-121 Casa Del Pueblo Tentative Plat Dear Stephanie: Your submittal of August 9, 2007 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a DETAILED cover letter explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLACKLINES MUST BE FOLDED 8 Copies Revised Tentative Plat (Wastewater, Fire, Addressing, Landscape, Zoning, ESD, Engineering, DSD) 4 Copies Revised Landscape Plan (Landscape, Zoning, Engineering, DSD) 2 Copies Revised NPPO Plan (Landscape, DSD) 2 Copies Cross Access and Parking Agreement (Zoning, DSD) 2 Copies Revised Drainage Report (Engineering, DSD) 2 Copies Geotechnical Report (Engineering, DSD) Should you have any questions, please call me at 837-4919. Sincerely, Patricia Gehlen CDRC Manager All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: (602) 957-7546 |