Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you cannot find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Plan Review Detail

Plan Number: S07-111
Parcel: Unknown

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW

Plan Number - S07-111
Review Name: TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
07/16/2007 FERNE RODRIGUEZ START PLANS SUBMITTED Completed
07/19/2007 PAUL MACHADO ENGINEERING REVIEW Denied To: Patricia Gehlen DATE: September 17, 2007
CDRC/Zoning Manager

SUBJECT: Escalante Park, 9750 E. Escalante Road
Subdivision Plat S07-111 (First Review)
T14S, R15E, Section 35

RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Subdivision Plat and Drainage Report.

The Subdivision Plat (SP) and Drainage Report (DR) cannot be approved as submitted. Please address the following review comments prior to the next submittal.

Subdivision Plat:

1. Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the DP.
2. Per rezoning condition no. 3: The owner/developer shall design and construct bank protection/erosion prevention structure along the site fromtage along the Pantano Wash/Escalante Wash as required. Coordination with Suzanne Shields at the Pima County flood control district, 740-6350, is advised.
3. Per rezoning condition no. 4: The natural area on the site shall include the 100-year floodplain of the Escalante Wash and the portions of the parcel to the east to be rezoned. These areas shall be platted as natural undisturbed open space (NOUS) and shall be included in the Convenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CCR's) as NUOS.
4. Per rezoning condition no. 5: The developer shall evaluate threshold retention alternatives in lieu of providing threshold retention. Water harvesting shall be incorporated into all alternatives.
5. Per rezoning condition no. 6: A trail easement along the Pantano Wash shall be contructed as determined by the City of Tucson Parks and Recreation Department. The dedication of a trail easement will be for public use and will allow for pedestrian and bicycle activity.
6. Show the existing EHS for the Pantano Wash and the Escalante Wash per Chapter 26-7 of the floodplain ordinance and per Chapter 7 of the SMDDFM.
7. Additional comments will be made, depending on the changes made to the DR and TP, upon the re-submittal of the TP and DR.


Drainage Report:
1. Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the DR.
2. This review was performed for Tentative Plat purposes only.
3. Show the existing EHS for the Pantano Wash and the Escalante Wash per Chapter 26-7 of the floodplain ordinance and per Chapter 7 of the SMDDFM.
4. A DR addressing EHS, Bank Protection Analysis and design, Sediment Transport analysis etc. is required.
5. A permit will be necessary for any work performed within the public drainage way of the Pantano Wash.
6. Additional comments will be made, depending on the changes made to the DR and TP, upon the re-submittal of the TP and DR.
7. A $150.00 review fee for the Drainage Report is required.
8. Please show the project address on the cover of the Drainage report.

If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-5550 x1193 or Paul.Machado@ci.tucsonaz.govs
Paul P. Machado
Senior Engineering Associate
City of Tucson/Development Services Department
201 N. Stone Avenue
P.O. Box 27210
Tucson, Arizona 85726-7210
(520) 791-5550 x1193 office
(520) 879-8010 fax
C:/9750 E. Escalante Rd. CDRC
07/24/2007 TOM MARTINEZ OTHER AGENCIES AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION Approved ADOT has NO COMMENT
S07-111
KORY ENGINEERING, INC.
ESCALANTE PARK LOTS 1 - 25

--------------------------------------------------------


Confidentiality and Nondisclosure Notice: This email transmission and any attachments are intended for use by the person(s)/entity(ies) named above and may contain confidential/privileged information. Any unauthorized use, disclosure or distribution is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by email, and delete or destroy all copies plus attachments.
07/27/2007 DBELL1 LANDFILL ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES Approved Landfill ordinance is not applicable. Property is more than 500 feet from a landfill.
08/01/2007 ED ABRIGO PIMA COUNTY ASSESSOR Approved Office of the Pima County Assessor


115 N. Church Ave.


Tucson, Arizona 85701



BILL STAPLES

ASSESSOR










TO: CDRC Office

Subdivision Review

City of Tucson (FAX# 791-5559)



FROM: Gary Ault, Mapping Supervisor

Pima County Assessor's Office

Mapping Department



DATE: August 1, 2007





RE: Assessor's Review and Comments Regarding Tentative Plat

S07-111 ESCALANTE PARK T141535





* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *



X Plat meets Assessor's Office requirements.

_______ Plat does not meet Assessor's Office requirements.





COMMENTS: PLEASE MAKE THE FOLLOWING ADJUSTMENTS BY FINAL PLAT STAGE:

1. ADD BEARINGS FOR ALL DIMENSIONS.



THANK YOU FOR YOUR SUBMITTAL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS PLEASE CALL
ROSANNA WERNER AT 740-4390



NOTE: THE ASSESSOR'S CURRENT INVOLVEMENT IN PROCESSING ITS MANUAL MAPS
TO DIGITAL FORMAT IS EXPEDITED GREATLY BY EXCHANGE OF DIGITAL DATA. IN
THE COURSE OF RECORDING THIS SUBDIVISION YOUR ASSISTANCE IN PROVIDING
THIS OFFICE WITH AN AUTOCAD COPY WOULD BE GREATLY APPRECIATED. THANK
YOU FOR ANY DIGITAL DATA PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED.













ROSANNA WERNER
08/03/2007 JIM EGAN COT NON-DSD FIRE Denied The road width must be 36 feet between the curbs if vertical curbs are used and parking is on both sides. Please see IFC Section D102 as amended.

Lot 14 has buildable area over 150 from the street. Automatic fire sprinklers would be required if it is possible the the building dimentions on Sheet 4 are exceeded.
08/06/2007 LIZA CASTILLO UTILITIES TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER Denied 4350 E. Irvington Road, Tucson, AZ 85714
Post Office Box 711, Tucson, AZ 85702


WR#185236 August 6, 2007



Kory Engineering, Inc.
Attn: Alex Kory
590 N. Morley Ave.
Nogales, AZ 85621

Dear Mr. Kory:

SUBJECT: ESCALANTE PARK
Lots 1-25
S07-111

Tucson Electric Power Company (TEP) has reviewed the tentative plat dated July 25, 2007. This Company is unable to approve the plat at this time.

There are existing electrical facilities within the boundaries of the development. The facilities along with the easement recording information must be shown on the plat prior to approval. If an existing easement is not found add a dimensioned easement by prescription and a general note that the facilities will be abandoned. The existing poles along Escalante road and the overhead service must be shown on the plat. All relocation costs will be billable to the developer. Please direct questions concerning easement(s) to Liza Castillo, Right-of-Way Agent in our Land Department at 520-917-8745.

TEP will provide a preliminary electrical design on the Approved Tentative Plat within fifteen (15) working days upon receipt of the plat. Additional plans necessary for preparation of the design are: building plans including water, electrical, landscape, sidewalk and paving plans. Should you have any questions, please contact area designer Marcus Hayes at 917-8705.


Sincerely,



Henrietta Noriega
Office Specialist
Design/Build
lm
enclosures
cc: P. Gehlen, City of Tucson (e-mail)
M. Hayes, Tucson Electric Power
08/06/2007 KAY MARKS PIMA COUNTY ADDRESSING Denied 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL
TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207

KAY MARKS
ADDRESSING OFFICIAL
PH: 740-6480
FAX #: 740-6370


TO: CITY PLANNING
FROM: KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL
SUBJECT: S07-111 ESCALANTE PARK, LOTS 1-25/TENTATIVE PLAT
DATE: 8/03/07



The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and the following matters must be resolved prior to our approval:

1.) Delete adjacent owner name, DK/PG, Lot # information on Location Map.

2.) Spell out Escalante Road on Sheets 1 & 3.

3.) Correct spelling of Proposed Gest Parking to: Guest on Sheet 3.

4.) Label with a star access for Lots 1 and 25 on Final Plat.

5.) Label approved interior street names on Final Plat.

6.) Are there any existing buildings located on this parcel? Will they remain or be demolished?


es
08/07/2007 ROGER HOWLETT COT NON-DSD COMMUNITY PLANNING Denied DEPARTMENT OF URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN COMMENTS

Regarding

SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application

CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT

S07-111 Escalante Park Lots 1-25 08/06/07

() Tentative Plat
() Development Plan
() Landscape Plan
() Revised Plan/Plat
() Board of Adjustment
() Other

CROSS REFERENCE: C9-05-08

NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: South Pantano Area Plan

GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE:

COMMENTS DUE BY: 08/13/07

SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:

() No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment
() Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions
() RCP Proposal Complies with Plan Policies
() See Additional Comments Attached
() No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on:
(XXXX) Resubmittal Required:
(XXXX) Tentative Plat
() Development Plan
(XXXX) Landscape Plan
(XXXX) Other – Cross Section and Color Elevations

REVIEWER: dcorral 791-4505 DATE: 7/31/07
Because this project is being proposed as a Residential Cluster Project (RCP), it must comply with section 3.6.1 of the Land Use Code, specifically section 3.6.1.4 of the general development criteria. The RCP requires compliance with policies of the General Plan, the Pantano East and the Design Guidelines Manual as well as with rezoning conditions set forth in Rezoning Case C9-05-08. The Plans require community amenities; such as but not limited to; streetscapes with pedestrian oasis, common area(s) of appropriate land size(s) to sustain residential amenities for all.

Please list rezoning conditions under the General Notes Section of the Tentative Plat.

Rezoning condition #2 states “The owner/developer shall design and construct street improvements along the frontage of Escalante Road. These improvements shall include an additional parking lane, curbs and sidewalks and curb access ramps.” Please submit a cross section illustrating how this requirement will be met.

Rezoning condition #13 states “dimensioned elevation drawings with proposed colors, materials and color photographs of surrounding properties shall be submitted as part of review by the Community Design Review Committee (CDRC).” Please submit dimensioned color elevations drawings to comply with Rezoning Conditions #11, 12, & 14.

Rezoning condition #19 states “internal pedestrian paths and/or sidewalks with adjacent landscape strips shall include one, 15 gallon canopy tree on every other lot adjacent to the pedestrian path/sidewalks.” Please show how this condition will be met on the landscape plan.

Rezoning condition #21 states “free-standing signs shall be integrated into the overall landscape plan along the Escalante Road street frontage. Details of all signage shall be part of the development plan submittal to CDRC.” Please illustrate how this condition will be met by incorporating sign details in the landscape plan.

6. Rezoning condition #24 states “Safe by Design” concepts shall be incorporated in the subdivision…. . Lots that incorporate walls that abut open space areas and common areas should meet the following criteria: the masonry portion of the wall does not exceed four (4) feet, eight (8) inches in height, except for pillars, with one (1) foot six (6) inch wrought iron or other similar open fencing materials on top. This is to provide security to those using the facility placing the “eyes of the community” on these areas. Please submit an elevation to show how compliance with this requirement will be met for lots 14 and 15 abutting the common area.
08/09/2007 FRODRIG2 OTHER AGENCIES PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS Approved CASE: S07-111, ESCALANTE PARK LOTS 1-25, TENT PLAT REVIEW

COMMENT: NO OBJECTIONS OR ADVERSE COMMENTS




Vehicle Trip Generation: Daily: 239 PM Peak:
25





Please call if you have questions



Tom Cooney, Travel Forecasting Manager

Pima Association of Governments

177 N. Church Ave, #405

Tucson, AZ 85701

Tel: (520) 792-1093, Fax: (520) 620-6981

Web: www.PAGnet.org and www.RTAmobility.com
08/10/2007 STEVE SHIELDS ZONING REVIEW Denied CDRC TRANSMITTAL

TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office
FROM: Steve Shields
Lead Planner

PROJECT: ESCALANTE PARK
S07-111
TENTATIVE PLAT

TRANSMITTAL DATE: August 09, 2007

DUE DATE: August 13, 2007

COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed.

1. Section 4.1.7.1, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a tentative plat. If, at the end of that time, the tentative plat has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this tentative plat is July 15, 2008.

2. Provide a separate letter explaining how all rezoning conditions have been complied with.

3. This subdivision requires Overlay Zone reviews for HILLSIDE DEVELOPMENT ZONE (HDZ) AND SEC. 2.8.6, ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE ZONE (ERZ). The overlay reviews must be completed and approved prior to approval of the Tentative Plat. Contact Patricia Gehlen @ 520-837-4919 for submittal requirements.

4. D.S. 2-03.2.1.C All lettering and dimension text shall be the equivalent of twelve (0.12") point or greater in size to facilitate reproduction and photographically reduced (microfilm) for record keeping. There is lettering on the location map that does not meet this standard. There is also spot elevation text on sheet 2 of 4 that does not meet this requirement. For clarity zoning recommends that the spot elevation be removed from sheet 2 of 4.

5. D.S. 2-03.2.1.D.2 Identify the subdivision located near the southeast corner of the location map.

6. D.S. 2-03.2.1.G.2 Provide a statement in the title block indicating that this plat is a "Residential Cluster Project (RCP).

7. D.S. 2-03.2.2.B.1 Place the S07-111 subdivision case number, C9-05-08 rezoning case number and the C15-87-3 annexation case number in the lower right corner of the plat next to the title block.

8. D.S. 2-03.2.2.B.2 & .3 General Note 1 should read "EXISTING ZONING IS SR, PROPOSED ZONING IS R1".

9. D.S. 2-03.2.2.B.3 List the rezoning conditions of approval on the plat.

10. D.S. 2-03.2.2.B.5 General Note 3 should read "PROPOSED USE FAMILY DWELLING 'RCP-4' SUBJECT TO: SEC 3.6.1 AND SEC 3.5.7.1.E AND F".

11. D.S. 2-03.2.2.B.5 Add the following to General Note 17 "THIS PLAT IS DESIGNED TO MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE OVERLAY ZONES CRITERIA: SEC. 2.8.1, HILLSIDE DEVELOPMENT ZONE (HDZ) AND SEC. 2.8.6, ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE ZONE (ERZ).

12. D.S. 2-03.2.4.D The zoning shown on the parcel located directly to the east, 136-31-003F, is not correct. This parcel is zoned SR.

13. D.S. 2-03.2.4.J If applicable all proposed easements (utility, sewer, drainage, access, etc.) are to be dimensioned and labeled as to their purposes and whether they will be public or private.

14. D.S. 2-03.2.4.M & D.S. 2-10.3.1.A The proposed 10' PERIMETER SETBACK shown along the east property line is not correct. The adjacent property is zoned SR and requires a twenty-five (25) foot setback.

15. D.S. 2-10.3.1.B Typical Lot Detail "E", remove the reference to "10' MIN. (FOR R2 ZONING)" as there are no parcels zoned R2 adjacent to this project. Change the garage setback to read 'THE GREATEST OF 19'-0" TO SIDEWALK, AND MUST MEET 18'-0" TO PROPERTY LINE"

16. D.S. 2-10.3.1.B Provide an interior lot typical setback detail.

17. D.S. 2-10.3.1.B Detail "F" PROJECT PERIMETER YARD SETBACK (STREET), It is unclear what is being shown on this detail. Show the entire lot with the proposed structure shown, garage location etc. The setback dimension shown from edge of travel to what appears to be the proposed structure should read the greater of 21' or the Height of Building Wall. Show setbacks dimension to all property lines.

18. D.S. 2-10.3.1.B Detail "G" is not relevant to this project, as there are no adjacent parcels zoned R2, remove from plan.

19. D.S. 2-10.3.1.B Sheet 1 of 4, LOT SETBACK REQUIREMENTS, Note 1 refers to a setback of 1' (measured to the property line), based on ADT of 140 to 1000 this setback is not allowed. Also remove the "x 1.0" from the building height as there is not a multiplying factor for this setback.

20. D.S. 2-10.3.1.B Sheet 1 of 4, LOT SETBACK REQUIREMENTS, remove all references to adjacent R2 zoned parcels.

21. D.S. 2-10.3.1.B B Sheet 1 of 4, LOT SETBACK REQUIREMENTS, provide a setback requirement for the parcels along Escalante Road.

22. D.S. 2-10.3.1.C The SITE COVERAGE CALCULATION is not correct. List the square footage for each of the following: proposed structures (use largest floor plan), driveways and streets. The 52% shown on the plan exceeds the maximum allowed site coverage of 50%.

23. D.S. 2-10.3.1.C Sheet 1 of 4 has lot coverage listed for Units one, two and three. The square footage listed for the units does not appear to correspond to models shown on sheet 4 of 4, please clarify.

24. D.S. 2-10.3.1.D & LUC 3.6.1.4.A.5 Twenty-five (25) percent of the ground floor units are to be provided with barrier-free accessibility. Indicate by note, how many and which units will be provided with barrier-free accessibility.

25. D.S. 2-10.3.2.E As there is common areas proposed (street and common area A), provide a copy of the Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&RS) for this subdivision if available at this time or submit with the final plat.

26. D.S. 2-10.3.2.F It appears that there is a proposed service road that runs along the south property lines. This service road appears to encroach on proposed private property. An access easement is required for all areas of encroachment for each lot. Also provide a copy of the protective covenants or common use agreement for these easements. Provide documentation that allows the service road to encroach into parcel 136-31-003D which is located to the south of this project.

27. Under RESIDNTIAL CLUSTER PROJECT DATA, note 7 lists the building height restriction as 25'. Per C9-05-08 Rezoning Condition #10 lists the maximum height as 24'. Rezoning conditions supercede the LUC in this case.

28. Please remove the Manhole information from the sheet 2 of 4 as it is not required and clutters the plat.

29. Sheet 4 of 4 Model 'B' is not called out on the DWELLING LAYOUT PLAN. If this model will not be used, remove it from the plan. Lot 4 does not have a model called out on the plan, what is the plan for this lot?

30. Additional comments may be forth coming depending on how each comment has been addressed.

If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4956.

C\planning\cdrc\tentativeplat\S07-111TP-RCP.doc


RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised tentative CC&R's and additional requested documents.
08/10/2007 PETER MCLAUGHLIN LANDSCAPE REVIEW Denied 1. Revise the scale on all sheets of the Landscape and Native Plant Preservation Plans to be correct. They should indicate the units (such as 1 inch = 50 feet or 1 inch = 20 feet) rather than straight ratios as given.

2. Indicate with a note on the drawings that the NUOS area shall be dedicated by final plat.

3. Rezoning condition #19 requires that internal pedestrian paths and/or sidewalks with adjacent landscape strips shall include one, 15 gallon canopy tree on every other lot adjacent to the pedestian path/sidewalk. Demonstrate compliance with this rezoning condition on the plan drawings.

4. Add the rezoning case number (C9-05-08) near the title block of all sheets of the Landscape Plan, Native Plant Preservation Plan and Tentative Plat. Also add the CDRC subdivision case number (S07-111) and any other related case numbers to the landscape and native plant preservation plans. DS 2-07.2.1.B

5. The 5-foot paved pedestrian path running near the detention/retention basin is shown in two different locations on the Tentative Plat and Landscape Plan. Revise to be consistent. Show the location of benches or other recreational amenities in relation to the proposed path on the Tentative Plat to indicate that there is no conflict.

6. It is unclear how the project is to be constructed when there is an erosion hazard setback running through the middle of the property and effecting most of the proposed residential lots. It is indicated in the rezoning file (rezoning condition #3) and the Environmental Resource Report that bank protection will be constucted along the washes and will include re-vegetation. Provide details as to where and how this will be accomplished and how erosion setbacks will be met. A revegetation plan or floodplain restoration plan will be required for these areas.

7. It is unclear from the Tentative Plat how the ERZ limits (general keynote 13) along the Escalante Wash were determined based on the labeled location of the 100-year flood plain (general keynote 12). Please clarify. Note that per rezoning condition #4 the natural area shall include the 100-year floodplain of the Escalante Wash. Revise plat as necessary. If the project proposes encroachment into the resource area an Environmental Resource Report (ERR) is required. The ERR submitted with the rezoning application has some but not all of the required elements of an ERR. The requirements of an ERR are listed in DS 2-13.2.5.B.

8. Add to general landscape note 15 on sheet LS-1 the words "...unless authorized by the City of Tucson Development Services Landscape Review Section."

9. The minimum required text size is 12 point (0.12") for microfilming purposes. Revise all text and dimensions, including those in the location map that does not meet this minimum archiving requirement.
08/14/2007 PGEHLEN1 TUCSON WATER NEW AREA DEVELOPMENT REVIEW Passed
08/14/2007 JOSE ORTIZ COT NON-DSD TRAFFIC Denied August 14, 2007
ACTIVITY NUMBER: S07-111
PROJECT NAME: Escalante Park Lots 1-25
PROJECT ADDRESS: 9750 E Escalante Rd
PROJECT REVIEWER: Jose E. Ortiz PE, Traffic Engineer

Resubmittal Required: Traffic Engineering does not recommend approval of the Tentative Plat; therefore a revised Tentative Plat is required for re-submittal.

The following items must be revised or added to the plat.

1. Include a response letter with the next submittal that states how all comments have been addressed.

2. Along Escalante illustrate the ROW width and dimension the existing widths of paving, curbs, curb cuts, and sidewalks. (DS 2-03.2.3.D)

3. A permit or a private improvement agreement will be necessary for any work performed within the Right-of-way. Contact Permits and Codes at (520) 791-5100 for permit information.

4. Add a general note to read "All non-signalized intersection street manes must have E-W block number addresses for E-W roadways and N-S block number addresses for N-S roadways."

5. The access points shall have 18' radius curb returns. (DS 3-01.0 figure 6)


If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-4259 x76730 or Jose.Ortiz@tucsonaz.gov
08/16/2007 FRODRIG2 PIMA COUNTY WASTEWATER Denied July 26, 2007

To: Alex Kory
Kory Engineering

Thru: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Manager
City of Tucson Development Services Department

___________________________
From: Tom Porter, Sr. CEA (520-740-6579), representing the Pima County
Departments of Wastewater Management and Environment Quality

Subject: Escalante Park, Lots 1-25
Tent. Plat - 1st Submittal
S07-111


The proposed sewer collection lines for the above-referenced project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use.

This project will be tributary to the Ina and Roger Rd. WWTF via the PTI. Obtain a letter from the PCWMD's Development Services Section, written within the past 90 days, stating that treatment and conveyance system capacity for the project is available in the downstream public sewerage system and provide a copy of that letter to this office. The required form to request such a letter may be found at:

http://www.pima.gov/wwm/forms/docs/CapResponseRequest.pdf.

The tentative or preliminary plat for this project cannot be approved until a copy of this letter has been received by this office.

All Sheets: Show the jurisdiction’s case number, S07-111, in or near the title block of each sheet. This case number should be shown larger and bolder than any associated cross-reference numbers.

Sheet 1: Revise General Note #10 to read as follows:

THE ON-SITE SANITARY SEWAGE COLLECTION LINES WILL BE PUBLIC AND DESIGNED AND CONSTRUCTED TO PIMA COUNTY WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT STANDARDS AND MUST BE ACCEPTED AND RELEASED FOR SERVICE BY THE PIMA COUNTY WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF SEWER CONNECTION PERMITS.

Sheet 1: Add the General Note:

THE REQUIRED OFF-SITE PUBLIC SANITARY SEWER LINE WILL BE DESIGNED AND CONSTRUCTED TO PIMA COUNTY WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT STANDARDS.

Sheet 2: The proposed sewer and manholes should be marked as public. Also the proposed sewer line segments should show length/slope/size and material of pipe.

Sheet 2: The public sewer line should be shown going west past MH#9558-05 and not just stopping there.

Sheet 2: The point of connection to the existing sewer line should be shown a minimum of 5’ from MH#9558-05 with a new MH #1 per PCWWM SD-303. The proposed manhole sequencing should start w/MH#1 as the furthest downstream and go up in sequence from there.

Sheet 2: In the legend note #9 add the word PUBLIC.

This office will require a revised set of bluelines, and a response letter, addressing these comments. Additional comments may be made during the review of these documents.

Pima County Code Title 13.20.030.A.2 requires that a wastewater review fee be paid for each submittal of the tentative or preliminary plat. The fee for the first submittal is $166 plus $50 per sheet. For the second submittal, the review fee is $50 per sheet. For all subsequent submittals, the review fee is $39 per sheet.

The next submittal of this project will be the second (2nd) submittal. A check for the review fee of this submittal in the amount of $100.00 (made out to PIMA COUNTY TREASURER) must accompany the revised set of bluelines and response letter.

If the number of sheets changes, please adjust the review fee accordingly.


If you have any questions regarding the above-mentioned comments, please contact me.
08/16/2007 ANDY VERA ENV SVCS REVIEW Approved Adequate street frontage access for all 25 residential lots. APC curbside garbage and recycle service to be provided.
08/22/2007 FRODRIG2 COT NON-DSD REAL ESTATE Denied >>> Andy Steuart 08/21/2007 3:43 PM >>>
S07-111 Escalante Park Lots 1-25: Tentative Plat Review - Concerning the 3.78 acres proposed for dedication to the City, request confirmation to which Department the area would be conveyed to.
08/24/2007 GLENN HICKS COT NON-DSD PARKS & RECREATION Denied DATE: August 23, 2007

TO: DSD_CDRC@ tucsonaz.gov

FROM: Glenn Hicks
Parks and Recreation
791-4873 ext. 215
Glenn.Hicks@tucsonaz.gov


SUBJECT: S07-111 Escalante Park Lots 1-25: Tentative Plat Review(7/16/2007)


Denied. Please contact Parks and Recreation to arrange a meeting to discuss fulfillment of rezoning conditions 3, 6, 7, 8.
09/18/2007 PATRICIA GEHLEN ZONING-DECISION LETTER REVIEW Denied COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES

September 18, 2007

Alex Kory
Kory Engineering, Inc.
590 North Morley Avenue
Nogales

Subject: S07-111 Escalante Park Lots 1-25 Tentative Plat

Dear Alex:

Your submittal of July 16, 2007 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a DETAILED cover letter explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed:

ALL BLACKLINES MUST BE FOLDED

12 Copies Revised Tentative Plat (Engineering, Fire, TEP, Addressing, DUPD, Landscape, Zoning, Traffic, Wastewater, Real Estate, Parks and Recreation, DSD)

6 Copies Revised Landscape Plan (Engineering, DUPD, Landscape, Zoning, Parks and Recreation, DSD)

2 Copies Revised NPPO Plan (Landscape, DSD)

2 Copies Revised Drainage Report (Engineering, DSD)

2 Copies Color Dimensioned Elevations (DUPD, DSD)


Should you have any questions, please call me at 837-4919.

Sincerely,

Patricia Gehlen
CDRC Manager

All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/

Via fax: (520) 287-3411