Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Plan Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Plan Number - S07-082
Review Name: TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 05/25/2007 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 05/31/2007 | JIM EGAN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | |
| 06/05/2007 | TOM MARTINEZ | OTHER AGENCIES | AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION | Approved | ADOT has NO COMMENT S07-082 Baker & Associates Engineering Speedway & Bonanza -------------------------------------------------------- Confidentiality and Nondisclosure Notice: This email transmission and any attachments are intended for use by the person(s)/entity(ies) named above and may contain confidential/privileged information. Any unauthorized use, disclosure or distribution is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by email, and delete or destroy all copies plus attachments. |
| 06/12/2007 | CDRC1 | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Denied | June 11, 2007 To: Martin Magelli, Baker & Associates Thru: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Project Manager City of Tucson Development Services Department ____________________________________ From: Tom Porter(520-740-6579), representing the Pima County Departments of Wastewater Management and Environmental Quality Subject: Speedway and Bonanza, Lots 1-118, Blocks A, B & C Tentative Plat - 1st Submittal S07-082 The proposed sewer collection lines for the above-referenced project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use. 1. Obtain a letter from the PCWMD's Development Services Section, written within the past 90 days, stating that treatment and conveyance system capacity for the project is available in the downstream public sewerage system and provide a copy of that letter to this office. The required form to request such a letter may be found at: http://www.pima.gov/wwm/forms/docs/CapResponseRequest.pdf. The tentative plat for this project cannot be approved until a copy of this letter has been received by this office. 2. Sheet 1: Show the proposed and existing sewer lines using different line-types, so that they can readily be distinguished from each other. Also, show and describe examples of these different line types in the legend on Sheet 1. 3. All Sheets: Show the jurisdiction's case number, S07-082, in or near the title block of each sheet. This case number should be shown larger and bolder than any associated cross-reference numbers. 4. Sheet 1: The word Public should be included the description of the sewer elements in the legend. 5. Sheet 2: The new 20' public sewer easement to be granted by final plat does not clearly point to the actual easement for option A and is not marked at all for the option B off-site sewer @ entry to the property. 6. Sheet 2 to 5: The 8" sewer line should be called out as public and the material of pipe should also be called out. Also the manholes should be marked as public. This could be done in the sewer manhole table. 7. Sheet 4: Must show only one option between A or B in the Tentative Plat. Option B may not be possible because a minimum of 20' easement for the sewer line would be required. 8. Sheet 4: The property lines for the property west of project are not clearly labeled. 9. Sheet 4: Manhole 8681-05 appears to be slightly off in location. It should front the alley along Arbor Circle instead of in front of Lot 1 as shown on plan. 10. Sheet 4: The portion of sewer proposed through the alley will have to be specially approved by PCWWM Engineering because of the minimum required easement of 20' needed. Contact Eric Wieduwilt @ 617-8205. This office will require a revised set of bluelines, and a response letter, addressing these comments. Additional comments may be made during the review of these documents. Pima County Code Title 13.20.030.A.2 requires that a wastewater review fee be paid for each submittal of the . The fee for the first submittal is $166 plus $50 per sheet. For the second submittal, the review fee is $50 per sheet. For all subsequent submittals, the review fee is $39 per sheet. The next submittal of this project will be the second(2nd) submittal. A check for the review fee of this submittal in the amount of $250.00 (made out to PIMA COUNTY TREASURER) must accompany the revised set of bluelines and response letter. If the number of sheets changes, please adjust the review fee accordingly. If you have any questions regarding the above mentioned comments, please contact me at the telephone number shown under my signature on the first page of this letter CC: Project File |
| 06/15/2007 | CDRC1 | OTHER AGENCIES | PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS | Approved | CASE: S07-082, SPEEDWAY & BONANZA: TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW COMMENT: NO OBJECTIONS OR ADVERSE COMMENTS Vehicle Trip Generation: Daily: 691 PM Peak: 61 Please call if you have questions Tom Cooney, Travel Forecasting Manager Pima Association of Governments 177 N. Church Ave, #405 Tucson, AZ 85701 Tel: (520) 792-1093, Fax: (520) 620-6981 Web: www.PAGnet.org and www.RTAmobility.com |
| 06/18/2007 | JOSE ORTIZ | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Denied | June 18, 2007 ACTIVITY NUMBER: S07-082 PROJECT NAME: Speedway & Bonanza PROJECT ADDRESS: Speedway Blvd/Bonanza PROJECT REVIEWER: Jose E. Ortiz PE, Traffic Engineer Resubmittal Required: Traffic Engineering does not recommend approval of the Tentative Plat; therefore a revised Tentative Plat is required for re-submittal. The following items must be revised or added to the plat. 1. Include a response letter with the next submittal that states how all comments have been addressed. 2. Show and label the size of both the existing and future SVTs (ie 20'x345') (DS 2-03.2.4.M). 3. Provide a Traffic Impact Analysis that discusses what off-site improvements are required due to this proposed development. 4. A private improvement agreement (PIA) will be necessary for the proposed work to be performed within the Right-of-way. An approved tentative plat is required prior to applying for a PIA. Contact the PIA Coordinator for additional PIA information at 791-5550 ext. 74937. 5. The access points shall have 25' radius curb returns off of Speedway. (DS 3-01.0 figure 6) 6. Provide documentation that confirms that Annexation condition 5 has been met or waved by the City of Tucson. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-4259 x76730 or Jose.Ortiz@tucsonaz.gov |
| 06/21/2007 | KAY MARKS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Denied | 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 KAY MARKS ADDRESSING OFFICIAL PH: 740-6480 FAX #: 740-6370 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL SUBJECT: S07-082 SPEEDWAY & BONANZA/TENTATIVE PLAT DATE: June 21, 2007 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and the following matters must be resolved prior to our approval: Delete N. from N. Constitution Drive on Location Map. Change 32-42 to 32-13 on Location Map. Bonanza Avenue is pointing to the incorrect location in section 2 on Location Map. Spell out all suffixes except on Location Map. Firewood Way cannot be used. Please choose a new street name. A list of street names may be submitted in order to check for duplication. jg |
| 06/21/2007 | FRODRIG2 | COT NON-DSD | REAL ESTATE | Denied | >>> Andy Steuart 06/21/2007 10:41 AM >>> S07-082 Speedway & Bonanza: Tentative Plat Review - Request the following be portrayed on the Plat: 1. Show Blocks "A" & "B" as transferred to the City. This item is mentioned on Sht. 1 of 5, General Notes 7.A., but not referenced as Blocks "A" & "B". 2. Show the N. part of Bonanza Rd. R/W as included in Block A. 3. Show the S. part of Bonanza Rd. R/W as being conveyed to Owner/Developer by Deed, per "Paper Plat Process." 4. S. portion of Bonanza Rd. R/W (i.e. area conveyed by city) should be portrayed as C.A."C" & "E". |
| 06/22/2007 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | Add the CDRC case number and any related case numbers to the landscape and native plant preservation plans. DS 2-07.2.1.B This site contains areas affected by the WASH Ordinance and the Environmental Resource Zone . For projects where there will be no encroachment within these Regulated Areas, the areas shall be identified on the site plan, plat or development plan in a surveyable manner. This plan, or a separate plan, shall also indicate the proposed location of the temporary fencing which is required to protect the Protected Riparian Areas during construction. Revise the submittal to comply. DS 2-13.2.5.A Revise the Environmental Resource Report/NPPO Plan to map the vegetative communities. DS 2-15.3.5 Provide the identifying call-outs to accompany the line work from the tentative plat on the native plant preservation plan or provide separate line legend. A separate native plant preservation plan is required for any off-site construction areas, such as the proposed sewer lines. This separate plan may be approved as part of the plat submittal or with grading/grubbing plans required for the sewer line areas. The plans must be approved prior to construction. LUC 3.8.3.1 Revise the NPPO plans to include any limits of grading or fence locations required by the WASH or ERZ regulations. RESUBMITTAL OF ALL PLANS IS REQUIRED |
| 06/22/2007 | ED ABRIGO | PIMA COUNTY | ASSESSOR | Approved | Office of the Pima County Assessor 115 N. Church Ave. Tucson, Arizona 85701 BILL STAPLES ASSESSOR TO: CDRC Office Subdivision Review City of Tucson (FAX# 791-5559) FROM: Gary Ault, Mapping Supervisor Pima County Assessor's Office Mapping Department DATE: June 22, 2007 RE: Assessor's Review and Comments Regarding Tentative Plat S07-082 SPEEDWAY & BONANZA T141502 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * X Plat meets Assessor's Office requirements. _______ Plat does not meet Assessor's Office requirements. COMMENTS: PLEASE MAKE THE FOLLOWING ADJUSTMENTS BY FINAL PLAT STAGE: 1. ADD TOTAL MILES OF NEW STREETS PUBLIC OR PRIVATE TO THE GENERAL NOTES. 2. ADD BEARINGS FOR ALL LINES. 3. SHOW TIE TO THE SECTION WITH DIMS AND BEARINGS. THANK YOU FOR YOUR SUBMITTAL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS PLEASE CALL ROSANNA WERNER AT 740-4390 NOTE: THE ASSESSOR'S CURRENT INVOLVEMENT IN PROCESSING ITS MANUAL MAPS TO DIGITAL FORMAT IS EXPEDITED GREATLY BY EXCHANGE OF DIGITAL DATA. IN THE COURSE OF RECORDING THIS SUBDIVISION YOUR ASSISTANCE IN PROVIDING THIS OFFICE WITH AN AUTOCAD COPY WOULD BE GREATLY APPRECIATED. THANK YOU FOR ANY DIGITAL DATA PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED. ROSANNA WERNER |
| 06/25/2007 | LAITH ALSHAMI | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | Laith Alshami, Engineering and Floodplain Review, 06/25/2007, TO: Patricia Gehlen FROM: Laith Alshami, P.E. CDRC Engineering SUBJECT: Speedway & Bonanza S07-082, T14S, R15E, SECTION 02 RECEIVED: Tentative Plat, Landscape Plan and Drainage Report on May29, 2007 The subject submittal has been reviewed and it can not be approved at this time. Address the following comments before review can continue. Prepare a detailed response that explains the revisions that were made and references the exact location in the drainage report and on the Tentative Plat where the revisions were made: Drainage Report: 1. Revise the width of the northwest outlet channel to match the results of the channel analysis. 2. This Office recommends including a copy of the check list in the CC & R's to allow the Home Owners Association access to the list and facilitate their maintenance responsibility. 3. Address in the report the waterharvesting requirements for this project. 4. Provide erosion control pads or structures at all discharge points to minimize erosion and maintenance requirements in the future. Address this issue and revise as necessary. Provide the design calculations for all required splash pads/erosion control structures. 5. Show the proposed street widths on Figure 1. 6. Show on Figure 1 the drainage structure dimensions (i.e. the proposed channel lengths, the basin dimensions, number and size of scuppers, etc.) the channel and maintenance ramp slopes, drainage structure elevations (i.e. flow line and pipe invert elevations, etc.). The drainage information shown on the Tentative Plat shall match the information shown on the drainage exhibits. 7. The drainage report did not include the analysis that determined the calculated 100-year floodplain and water surface elevations. Provide the analysis for review. 8. Show on Figure 1 all proposed drainage solutions/structures with all required details (i.e. type, materials, location, size and dimensions, slopes, grades, high and low points, water ponding and slope setback lines, retention/detention basins inlet details, waterharvesting basins, lot drainage and surface flow arrows, finished floor elevations, cross section locations and details, etc.) that would clarify how the proposed drainage scheme will work. The drainage information shown on the tentative plat and grading plan will be based on the information provided in the drainage report text and drainage exhibits. 9. Provide street ratings to verify street runoff conveyance. 10. Revise the width of the Northwest Outlet Channel shown in cross-section #4 to 6' in accordance with the width provided in the Drainage Report. Tentative Plat: 1. Provide the correct S (yr)-______ subdivision case number and the rezoning case # in accordance with Development Standard (D.S.) 2-03.2.2.B.1. 2. It appears that lot 38 does not meet the requirements of differential grading. Revise the proposed pad grade or verify compliance with the requirements of D.S. 11-01.8.0. (Fills). 3. Provide monuments on the lot line corners west of lot 40 (D.S. 2-03.2.3.A). 4. It is not clear how the lots that are proposed to be installed on a fill (i.e. western and northern, etc.) will be protected from eroding. Are retaining walls or other erosion control methods proposed. Provide this information on the Tentative Plat. 5. Provide ground elevations at different points on each lot for reference to future grading and site drainage (D.S. 2-03.2.4.L.4). 6. Verify that there are no existing easements within the proposed development (D.S. 2-03.2.3.C.). Provide an up to date Title Report to facilitate existing easement review. 7. The proposed easement callouts do not provide the required information. Proposed easements are to be dimensioned and labeled as to their purpose and whether they will be public or private (D.S. 2-03.2.4.J). 8. Lots 5-8 appear to be very close to the 50'-study area that encroachment is possible in the field. Propose methods to ensure the grading/construction activities will not encroach on the study area. 9. Provide the narrowest pavement dimension for Firewood Way near lots 83-106. 10. Is parking proposed on Firewood Way between lots 1 and 62? Provide a cross section to clarify the parking situation in that segment of Firewood Way. 11. The City of Tucson is planning improvement work on Speedway Blvd adjacent to this project. Coordinate this project with City Transportation Department, Engineering Section, and revise the plat as needed. 12. Provide the radii for all street curves and curb returns. Please be advised that the streets are private, the street profiles shall be included in the grading plan. 13. Verify compliance with Annexation Conditions #5 and #7. 14. Block "C" appears to be the extension of Bonanza Avenue alignment. 15. Show the typical lot line on detail 11/5. Typically, a slope shall be offset a minimum of two feet from the lot line. 16. Detail 11/5 is not sufficient to address the slopes created by the proposed cut and fill. The plan shall show the proposed run outs for the elevated lots slopes, such as lots 35-38, in order to determine the degree of encroachment on the natural and protected areas. 17. Lots 71-76 and 109-114 appear to be lower than the adjacent common areas (C.A. "A"), yet the plan shows the lots slope down towards the common areas. Are the common areas proposed to be lowered? Clarify this situation and revise all similar situations as necessary. 18. The plan shall show interceptor channels for the lowered lots, such as lots 71-76, to protect them from the drainage from the adjacent higher areas. Revise the plan accordingly. 19. It is not clear what Common Area "D" (Natural Drainage) is proposed to be. It appears to be an encroachment on the washes. Clarify. 20. The short private street adjacent to lots 35-38 is not acceptable. Garbage collection trucks and fire trucks require adequate turn around. Revise the plan accordingly. 21. There are several adjacent lots that are proposed to have the same grade, which could create unintentional ponding on some lots. This Office recommends stepping the lots to prevent possible ponding. Lots may also be grouped in pairs, where every pair will have the same pad grade. 22. Slope treatment and stabilization shall be based on the Geotechnical Report recommendation. Provide a copy of the Geotechnical Report with the required recommendations. 23. Revise the Tentative Plat in accordance with the drainage report revisions. Landscape Plan: The Landscape Plan is acceptable to Engineering and Floodplain Review subject to addressing satisfactorily Landscape Review comments. RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Revised Tentative Plat, Landscape Plan and Drainage Report |
| 06/26/2007 | PGEHLEN1 | TUCSON WATER NEW AREA DEVELOPMENT | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 06/26/2007 | ROBERT YOUNG | PIMA COUNTY | PIMA CTY - DEV REVIEW | Passed | |
| 06/27/2007 | KAROL ARAGONEZ | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Karol Aragonez Planner PROJECT: S07-082 Speedway & Bonanza Tentative Plat TRANSMITTAL DATE: June 26, 2007 DUE DATE: June 25, 2007 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. Section 4.1.7.1, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a tentative plat. If, at the end of that time, the tentative plat has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this tentative plat is May 28, 2008. 2. Case number S07-082 has been assigned to this tentative plat. Please place this number in the right corner of all sheets of the tentative plat, landscape plan, NPPO, and any other associated sheets. DS 2-03.2.2.B.1 3. Please place the annexation case number C9-84-32 in the lower right corner of all sheets of the tentative plat, landscape plan, NPPO, and any other associated sheets. Provide a separate response letter detailing compliance with the applicable annexation conditions. DS 2-03.2.2.B.1 4. Please add to general note 6 the subject to portion of the R-3 RCP-7 which is LUC Sec. 3.5.7.1.f. DS 2-03.2.2.B.5 5. Please revise general note 3 to read "This subdivision is subject to Ordinance No. 6089 which established zoning in the Tanque Verde/Wrightstown Annexation Area". DS 2-03.2.2.B.9 6. Please draw all existing easements on the plan along with recordation information, location, width, and purpose. If an easement is no longer in use and scheduled to be vacated or has been abandoned, so indicate. If none exist provide response to reviewer's comments. Also if easements are purposed please draw, dimension and label as to their purpose and whether they will be public or private. If none exist provide response to reviewer's comments. DS 2-03.2.3.C & J 7. Please provide information as to how access is provided to parcels 297 and 298 northwest of this project. It appears that these properties currently gain access along the west side of this property and the current Bonanza Avenue which is proposed for vacation. Alternate access to these parcels must be reviewed and approved by Engineering prior to approval of this tentative plat. 8. All RCPs require site improvements that include curbs and sidewalks (LUC 3.6.1.4.H). Please provide a sidewalk extending along the south side of the private street fronting on lots 35-38. Eliminating the sidewalk from the private street as shown in detail 3/5 would require approval through the Board of Adjustment. The actual design of the private street does not meet the requirements needed for trash and emergency vehicles. Please refer to DS 3-01.6.2. 9. On-street parking is required for all streets per DS 3-01.10.0 Figure 2 when utilizing wedge curbs. Vertical curbs are required when on-street parking is not purposed as shown in Figure 1 of DS 3-01.10.0. Please revise detail 3/5 and the entrance street between lots 1 and 62. 10. Please provide wheel-stop curbing in detail 14/5. The curbing is to be placed two and one-half (2 ½) feet from the front of the handicap and standard parking space. DS 3-05.2.3.C.2 11. To allow vehicles to back up into the private street from parking spaces provided for the recreation center a DSMR must be applied for and approved. Applications can be found at the DSD web site http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd under forms and records. Once the application is submitted and approved place the DSMR case number, date of approval and any conditions of approval as a note and place the DSMR case number in the lower right corner of all sheets of the tentative plat, landscape plan, NPPO, and any other associated sheets. 12. Visitor parking must be provided to all lots within one hundred and fifty (150) feet of the front property lines of each residential unit within the subdivision. It appears that lots 87-88 and 101-102 do not meet this criterion. The one hundred and fifty (150) feet is measured along the proposed pedestrian path (not a straight shot). DS 3-05.2.4.A.1 13. Please provide the dimension of proposed parallel visitor parking spaces. Per DS 3-05.2.1.B.2 the length of a parallel parking space is twenty-three (23) feet unless located immediately adjacent to an access drive, alley, or street intersection, which then requires a length of eighteen (18) feet. 14. To provide accessible pedestrian paths within the RCP additional handicap ramps should be provided at midpoints of streets and knuckles to allow a handicap individual to cross the street without having to go the entire length of the street. Please provide. 15. Please provide both the maximum allowed building height per RCP-7 (40 feet) and the purposed building height based on the tallest model. LUC 3.2.3.1.F 16. Please provide a detail illustrating the required outdoor space for attached structures. This detail must demonstrate that a) Of the three hundred (300) square feet, a minimum of one hundred (100) square feet is provided as one (1) consolidated outdoor space; and b) The one hundred (100) square foot space is a minimum of ten (10) feet in width in any direction; and c) Such consolidated space is designed as an extension of the indoor space with access from that space; and d) The consolidated space is not obstructed by any overhang less than seven (7) feet above design grade; and e) The consolidated space is not within the sight visibility area as provided in Development Standard 3-01.0. LUC 3.6.1.4.D.2.c 17. The proposed subdivision is within the Pantano East Area Plan. Please submit drawings, photos, elevations, and/or other plans that show how the RCP will comply with design requirements as required by LUC Sec. 3.6.1.4.A.1. This information is to be submitted to the Department of Urban Planning and Design for review and final approval. DS 2-10.3.2.B 18. Because lot sizes within this proposed subdivision are less than four thousand (4,000) square feet, please submit the following information: a) Floor plans or drawings of the footprint of each unit, showing exterior dimensions. If only dimensioned building footprints are provided, be certain that locations of second floors (if applicable), front entrances, and motor vehicle parking spaces are noted. The floor plans can be preliminary plans and do not have to be complete construction drawings. Plans can be reviewed in a more timely manner if copies of the building footprints drawn at the same scale as the plat are provided. This allows staff the ability to check which models fit which lots using a light table, instead of performing the tedious lot-by-lot math work. b) Building elevations of all proposed units with height dimensions. These assist in determining compliance with perimeter yard setbacks and screening of mechanical equipment. The elevations can be preliminary drawings. The model home construction plans will be used to determine exact setbacks and screening requirements at the time of application for building permits. c) A list indicating which model homes fit which lots. Unless a lot is planned for another use, each lot will be designed so that at least one of the model units fits on the lot in compliance with Code requirements. The list should indicate whether optional covered patios, porches, etc., will still allow the unit to fit on the lot in compliance with requirements. DS 2-10.3.2.D 19. Please provide three (3) copies of the CC&Rs as required by DS 2-10.3.1.E and two (2) copies of protective covenants or common use agreements for shared drives or walkways to be established by easements over individually-owned property as required by DS 2-10.3.2.F 20. All areas of an RCP, except those areas that fit under the definition of site coverage or are designated for the exclusive use of individual residents, shall be landscaped with water-conserving, drought-tolerant vegetation. (For specific plant material, see Development Standard 2-16.0.) Mini-oasis concepts are acceptable, provided the oasis area landscape requirements of Sec. 3.7.0, Landscaping and Screening Regulations, are satisfied. LUC 3.6.1.4.A.4 21. Please note bus turn-out lanes and bus waiting shelters must be provided if requested by the City. LUC 3.6.1.4.A.7 22. Please provide a detail as to how screening of the mechanical equipment is done. If ground mounted and screened by property walls please provide note stating that. If roof mounted provide a detail showing how screening will be architecturally integrated with the overall design of the RCP. LUC 3.6.1.4.A.9 23. Please remove the proposed setback of one (1) foot measured from property line from street frontage setbacks for interior streets and MS&R. This setback only applies to ADTs of 140 or less. LUC 3.2.6.5.B.1 24. Please revise setbacks that refer to building height. This should read "Building Wall Height" which is the distance measured horizontally from a specific point to the face of each exterior building wall at the walls highest point. The specific point being either the property line or edge of travel lane or future curb location. LUC 3.2.6.3 25. Please revise the interior lot line setbacks by removing reference to street setbacks. This has already been provided in "Street Frontage Setbacks". Where zero lot lines are not used the minimum side and rear setback shall be three (3) feet or as provided by LUC 3.6.1.4.D.2.c. Lots 1-4 and 53-62 rear setbacks will be greater of LUC Sec. 3.6.1.4.D.2.c, three (3), or as provided by the street perimeter yard setback from Speedway Boulevard. 26. Please remove general note 29. Plot plans will be reviewed by Development Services. 27. Please revise general note 27 by removing the last portion of the note "and to verify that all models fit will fit on lots. This portion of the review will be done by Zoning review at Development Services. Urban Planning and Design shall only review for four (4) sided architecture and items related to the Area Plan. 28. Please provide a document as to how the recreation center will be developed in proportion to the number of residential units developed. The site amenity must be designed to function as units are constructed. Per LUC Sec. 3.6.1.4.H all amenities and improvements must be completed upon thirty (30) percent of the total number of residential units within the RCP (35 units). 29. A separate Special Application, review, and approval for the Environmental Resource Zone (ERZ) overlay is required. For more information the applicant must contact Patricia Gehlen at 791-5608 ext. 74919. The application form is on the DSD website at:http://www.tucsonaz.gov/dsd/Forms_Fees___Maps/Applications/Overlay_Zone_Application.pdf. Submittal material will include an Environmental Resource Report as established in DS 9-06.0. A mitigation plan as required in LUC Sec. 2.8.6.5.D must be provided. Permits for grubbing, grading, construction, or any other improvements will not be issued until all applicable requirements of LUC Sec. 2.8.6.5 and 2.8.6.6 are met. All applications for ERZ shall be reviewed by the Stormwater Advisory Committee, which will make recommendations on the application to the DSD Director. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Karol Aragonez, (520) 791-5550, ext. 74960. KAA S:\zoning review\karol\planning\cdrc\tentativeplat\S07-082tp.doc RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised tentative plat, CC&R's and additional requested documents. |
| 06/29/2007 | ANDY VERA | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Lots 35 thru 38 do not provide adequate street frontage access due to required unsafe backing of service vehicle. Must design a T or Y turnaround to allow for safe maneuvering. Refer to DS 6-01.0 figure 1 or 3-01.0 figure 23. 2. Firewood Way from lots 84 thru 105 indentifies vertical curbing (chicane). These curbed areas prohibit automated plastic container (APC) curbside service due to them extending beyond street frontage area or sidewalk. Service vehicle would have to weave in and and around curbing which is not adequate. Clarify purpose of this area. Must provide street frontage access with a continuous flow for service vehicle and sufficient space for placent of refuse and recycle APC's. Correct on resubmittal. |
| 07/03/2007 | ROGER HOWLETT | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Denied | DEPARTMENT OF URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN COMMENTS Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT S07-082 Speedway and Bonanza 07/02/07 (X) Tentative Plat () Development Plan (X) Landscape Plan () Revised Plan/Plat () Board of Adjustment () Other CROSS REFERENCE: NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: Pantano East GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: No COMMENTS DUE BY: June 25, 2007 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: () No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment () Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions () RCP Proposal Complies with Plan Policies (X) See Additional Comments Attached () No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: (X) Resubmittal Required: (X) Tentative Plat () Development Plan (X) Landscape Plan () Other REVIEWER: msp 791-4505 DATE: 6/25/07 Department of Urban Planning and Design S07-082 Speedway & Bonanza: Tentative Plat June 25, 2007 Because this project is being proposed as a Residential Cluster Project (RCP), it must comply with section 3.6.1 of the Land Use Code, specifically section 3.6.1.4 of the general development criteria. The RCP requires compliance with applicable policies of the General Plan, those of the Pantano East Area Plan, and the Design Guidelines Manual guidance. Proposed residential cluster projects shall adhere to Plan policies, which request community amenities, such as but not limited to; streetscapes with pedestrian oasis, common area(s) of appropriate land size(s) to sustain residential amenities for all. Staff offers the following comments: 1. Annexation Ordinance No. 6089, item 7.a & b. requires the dedication of an easement along Tanque Verde Creek containing the 100 year flood-plain, and the dedication of Tanque Verde Creek flood-way and the north/south drainageway located on the eastern portion of the property. Please provide documentation, which shows you are processing this requirement with the City of Tucson, Department of Transportation, Flood Control District, under a compliance review as it applies to Ordinance No. 6089, item 7.a, & 7 b. 2. Please revise landscape plan, sheet L4 by deleting the language which states "Future Recreational Center." Revise same sheet to identify the required RCP recreational amenities as part of this tentative plat review. Recreational site is located within Common Area "B, " between lots 26 & 27. Recreational amenities shall include, but not limited to; tot lot, half-ball court, ramada, tables, bench seats, trash receptacles, BBQ, thornless native canopy trees, thornless bushes and ground cover planting, and turf area. Recreational amenities shall have an all-weather access path (minimum five feet wide) that connects to the on-site sidewalk system. 3. The City of Tucson General Plan and the Design Guidelines Manual address the importance of development that uses colors of the natural environment which include a variety of blended shades such as blues, yellows, oranges, greens, purples and reds. Applying a variety of these colors to this RCP residential development would be consistent with the variety of colors surrounding the area. Please add a general note on the plat that no more than three attached units shall share the same façade or color scheme. 4. A trail is required along the north property line, adjacent to the Tanque Verde Creek. Please provide documentation that states you are in contact with the City of Tucson, Parks and Recreation Department, and in the process of complying with this requirement, as determined by Parks and Recreation 5. Please revise tentative plat and landscape plan to provide a five feet wide all-weather pedestrian pathway within "Common Area E," which is located along the western edge of the development site. Pedestrian path within Common Area E to provide a link between the on-site sidewalk system and the required Tanque Verde Creek Trial to be constructed along the northern edge, as part of the Tanque Verde Creek trail system. Staff recommends the on-site sidewalk system and the Common Area "E" pedestrian path connect at a point located west of lot 38. This connection point shall provide a safe and well light pedestrian wall opening (if walled) for pedestrian accessibility. 6. The General Plan, and the Design Guidelines Manual encourages the creation of cooling microclimates along pedestrian paths that are internal to the subdivision. In order to provide such a microclimate it is required to provide on both sides of every subdivision street, on every other lot, a minimum of one fifteen (15) gallon, native canopy tree, within front yards, no more than ten (10) feet from the back of the sidewalk. Please revise landscape plan by adding a note on sheet L3, which states " Front Yard Mitigation Trees to be placed on both sides of every street, on every other lot and to be irrigated individually by their Respective lots (typ). 7. Residential Policy #3 D, requires multi-family residential development to provide screening and buffering along the perimeters if to be located adjacent to lower density existing residential neighborhoods. Therefore, please revise tentative plat and landscape plan to provide a minimum six-foot tall masonry wall along the rear property lines of lots 39 through 52 (portion of the western perimeter), excluding areas with sight visibility triangle requirements, as determined by the Department of Transportation, Traffic Engineering. areas, Wash Ordinance Wash, NUOS and Floodplain limits. 8. Please revise tentative plat and landscape plan to provide masonry view wall along the rear property lines of lots 5 through 38 and along the perimeter of Common Area "B"/Rec. Area." View walls to include a combination of masonry brick, ornamental wrought iron or other types of security material which allows view sheds while protecting the rear yard privacy of lots 5 through 38. View walls to provide view sheds toward the Estes Wash and the Tanque Verde Creek, which are located along the eastern and northern perimeter of the site. 9. The Eastern Pima County Trail System Master Plan requires Primary Trail #9 to be constructed along the Tanque Verde Creek. Please revise tentative plat and landscape plan to provide a primary trail with pedestrian amenities, and landscape material. Trail to be located along the full length of northern perimeter area of the site, which is the southern edge of the Tanque Verde Creek. Design of Tanque Verde Creek Trail, with its associated pedestrian amenities, and landscape material shall require approval from the Department of Parks and Recreation prior to tentative plat approval. The Tanque Verde Creek Trail shall be designed to include a safe pedestrian path of no less than 5 feet wide, made of all -weather material and ADA accessible. Tanque Verde Creek Trail system shall link with the pedestrian path in Common Area E," located along the western edge of the site. 10. Please provide documentation that demonstrates this project and the associated environmental resource report is under review for approval by the Office of Conservation and Sustainable Development (OCSD). The OCSD is located at 345 E. Toole Avenue and their telephone number is 791-4675. 11. The Design Guidelines Manual states that side and rear building facades should be built with attention to architectural character and detail comparable to the front façade, particularly if rear and side facades are visible from streets. Enhancement can include design treatments such a pop outs, color variation, etc. Massing of proposed structures to existing structures in the vicinity will also be a part of this review. Please revise tentative plat to show how the site design will comply with RCP design requirements. Please provide conceptual architectural (color), renderings/drawn to scale. |
| 07/05/2007 | LIZA CASTILLO | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Approved | 4350 E. Irvington Road, Tucson, AZ 85714 Post Office Box 711, Tucson, AZ 85702 WR#182736 July 3, 2007 Baker & Assoc. Engineer Attn: Martin Mageli P.E. 1636 N. Swan Ste. 200 Tucson, AZ 85712 Dear Mr. Mageli: SUBJECT: Speedway & Bonanza Lots 1 thru 118 S07-082 Tucson Electric Power Company (TEP) has no objection to the preliminary plat submitted for review June 7, 2007. The preliminary point where TEP will serve this project is from the J2 Tag-2, Poles #2 and #91 along Speedway Blvd. Poles are within the road Right of Way within easement Docket #12064 / 4972. Equipment placement on this tentative is hypothetical and subject to change. We will need a request from customer for a preliminary layout when the tentative plat has been approved by the governing agency. Enclosed is a copy of TEP's facility map showing the approximate location and unit numbers of the existing facilities. Also enclosed is a copy of the tentative plat showing where TEP will be placing the aboveground equipment for this subdivision. This is not a preliminary design. TEP has provided this drawing to show where the proposed locations are for transformers and pedestals. TEP will provide a preliminary electrical design on the Approved Tentative Plat within Fifteen (15) working days upon receipt of the plat. Additional plans necessary for preparation of the design are: building plans including water, electrical, landscape, sidewalk and paving plans. Also, submit the AutoCAD version of the plat on a CD or email to HNoriega@tep.com. Should you have any questions, please contact me at (520) 918-8709. Any technical questions should be directed to the Designer, Marcus Hayes at 917-8705. Sincerely, Henrietta Noriega Office Specialist Design/Build hn Enclosures cc: City of Tucson, (Email letter only) J. Campbell, Developer M. Hayes, Designer |
| 07/11/2007 | GLENN HICKS | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Denied | DATE: July 11, 2007 TO: DSD_CDRC@ tucsonaz.gov FROM: Glenn Hicks Parks and Recreation 791-4873 ext. 215 Glenn.Hicks@tucsonaz.gov CC: Steve Anderson SUBJECT: S07-082 Speedway & Bonanza: Tentative Plat Review(5-29-07) Denied. Please contact City of Tucson Parks and Recreation to arrange a meeting with Parks and Recreation and Pima County Natural Resources Parks and Recreation to discuss public trail access, parking, construction and dedication for the Tanque Verde Creek Trail(Trail #9 of the Eastern Pima County Trail System Master Plan) and Estes Wash Trail(Trail #192 of the EPCTSMP). |
| 07/12/2007 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES July 12, 2007 Martin V. Magelli, P.E. Baker & Associates Engineering 1636 North Swan Road, Suite 200 Tucson, Arizona 85712 Subject: S07-082 Speedway & Bonanza Tentative Plat Dear Marty: Your submittal of May 29, 2007 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a DETAILED cover letter explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLACKLINES MUST BE FOLDED 11 Copies Revised Tentative Plat (Wastewater, Traffic, Real Estate, Addressing, Landscape, Engineering, Zoning, ESD, DUPD, Parks and Recreation, DSD) 6 Copies Revised Landscape Plan (Landscape, Engineering, Zoning, DUPD, Parks and Recreation, DSD) 2 Copies Revised NPPO Plan and ERR (OSCD, Landscape, DSD) 3 Copies Elevations/Photos and Floor Plans (Zoning, DUPD, DSD) 2 Copies Traffic Impact Analysis (Traffic, DSD) 2 Copies Revised Drainage Report (Engineering, DSD) 2 Copies Common Use Agreements (Zoning, DSD) Should you have any questions, please call me at 837-4919. Sincerely, Patricia Gehlen CDRC Manager All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: 318-1930 Tp-resubmittal |