Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Plan Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Plan Number - S07-048
Review Name: TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 03/30/2007 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 04/09/2007 | TOM MARTINEZ | OTHER AGENCIES | AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION | Approved | NO COMMENT S07-048 OBSIDE LLC MARABELLA -------------------------------------------------------- Confidentiality and Nondisclosure Notice: This email transmission and any attachments are intended for use by the person(s)/entity(ies) named above and may contain confidential/privileged information. Any unauthorized use, disclosure or distribution is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by email, and delete or destroy all copies plus attachments. |
| 04/12/2007 | PAUL MACHADO | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | To: Patricia Gehlen DATE: June 7, 2007 CDRC/Zoning Manager SUBJECT: Marabella, 9500 E. Tanque Verde Rd. Tentative Plat S07-048 (First Review) T13S, R15E, Section 35 RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Tentative Plat and Drainage Report. The Tentative Plat (TP) and Drainage Report (DR) cannot be approved as submitted. Please address the following review comments prior to the next submittal. Tentative Plat: 1. Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the TP. 2. As per the Federal ADA requirements, all wheel chair ramps shall have the truncated domes instead of the standard grooves that are shown on COT SD 207. Aside from the Truncated Domes, all wheel chair ramps shall be constructed in accordance with COT SD 207. 3. A separate Special Application, review, and approval for the Scenic Corridor Zone (SCZ) overlay is required. For more information the applicant must contact Patricia Gehlen at 520-837-4919. 4. All lettering and dimensions will be the equivalent of twelve (0.12) point or greater in size. There are numerous pieces of text that do not meet the twelve (0.12) point requirement. The TP should checked for clarity also per D.S. 2-03.2.1.C. 5. Revise General Note 5 to include "Sec. 2.8.3, Major Streets and Routes (MS&R) Setback Zone" D.S. 2-03.2.2.B.7 6. The provided street cross sections do not meet the minimum standards of D.S. 3-01, Figure 1 per D.S. 2-03.2.4.G 7. G Street access is required to all proposed lots of the plat. Provide street access to the three (3) southern lots per D.S. 2-03.2.4.G 8. A sidewalk is required on both sides of the proposed private street, Per D.S. 3-01.0 Figure 1 and per D.S. 2-03.2.4.G 9. The proposed D.G. Pedestrian Path does not meet the requirements for a sidewalk per D.S. 2-08.5.1.C and D.S. 2-03.2.4.G. 10. The sidewalk must be located in a pedestrian utility easement or pedestrian access easement per D.S. 2-03.2.4.G 11. All easement of record must be graphically shown on the plan together with recording docket and page per D.S. 2-02.2.1.20. 12. An easements will be required for the proposed sewer and water lines that are connecting to existing sewer and water service located within the Castle Rock development. These easements must be done under a separate instrument not recorded with this plat. These easements must be recorded prior to approval of this plat per D.S. 2-03.2.4.J 13. Label existing and future sight visibility triangles per D.S. 2-02.2.1.10. 14. Show all points of egress and ingress including locations and width of driveways and parking area access lanes (P.A.A.L.) per D.S. 2-02.2.1.11. 15. Please label all vehicular, bicycle, pedestrian, and handicapped circulation clearly identified per D.S. 2-02.2.1.12. 16. Please list estimated cut & fill quantities per D.S. 2-02.2.1.17. 17. Please show dimensioned right-of-way, including any applicable Major Streets and Routes (MS&R) Plan right-of-way per D.S. 2-02.2.1.19. 18. All easement of record must be graphically shown on the plan together with recording docket and page per D.S. 2-02.2.1.20. 19. Add the basin(s) maintenance responsibility note per S.M.D.D.F.M. 2.3.1.6 C 1 and 2 to the TP. 20. Dimension from street monument lines to existing and proposed curbs, sidewalks, driveways, and utility lines per D.S. 2-02.2.1.21. 21. Please provide existing topographic contours at intervals not exceeding two (2) feet and/or spot elevations as pertinent and Bench Mark based on City of Tucson Datum, including City Field Book and page number per D.S. 2-02.2.1.23. 22. Show Development plan number (S07-048) on all sheets per D.S. 2-02.2.1.29. 23. Show refuse container location, size, and access thereto fully dimensioned per D.S. 2-02.2.1.32 and D.S. 6-01.0. 24. A permit or a private improvement agreement will be necessary for any work performed within the Right-of-way. Contact Permits and Codes at (520) 791-5100 for permit information. 25. List the consulting engineer (phone number) on the plans with the pertinent information. 26. Add note: "Depress all landscaped areas 6" maximum for water harvesting". 27. "A grading permit and Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plans (SWPPP's) will be required for this project. Submit 3 sets of grading and SWPPP's with text, upon completion and submittal of a grading permit application. A grading permit may not be issued prior to site plan approval. Subsequent comments may be necessary, depending upon the nature and extent of revisions that occur to the plans". Drainage Report: 1. This review was performed for Tentative Plat purposes only. The DR has been accepted for TP purposes only. Final acceptance is done at the Grading plan stage. 2. Please list the contact phone number on the cover of the DR. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 837-4932 or Paul.Machado@ci.tucsonaz.govs Paul P. Machado Senior Engineering Associate City of Tucson/Development Services Department 201 N. Stone Avenue P.O. Box 27210 Tucson, Arizona 85726-7210 (520) 791-5550 x1193 office (520) 879-8010 fax C:/9500 E. Tanque Verde Rd. CDRC |
| 04/19/2007 | JIM EGAN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Denied | Please add the following notes to the plan. 1. Additional fire hydrants shall be provided by the developer as required by the fire code in accordance with C.O.T. Standards. 2. An approved water supply capable of supplying the projected fire flow for fire protection shall be provided and extended to serve directly any and all subdivided properties. 3. "NO PARKING FIRE LANE" signs shall be provided as needed to provide 20' clear unobstructed width along all fire apparatus access roadways in accordance with the fire code. 4. On street parking shall be prohibited on both sides and signs shall be installed so indicating. 5. Lots 10, 11 and 12 will require automatic fire psrinklers. (Section C does not meet fire lane requirements.) |
| 04/19/2007 | KAY MARKS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Denied | 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 KAY MARKS ADDRESSING OFFICIAL PH: 740-6480 FAX #: 740-6370 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL SUBJECT: S07-048 MARABELLA/TENATIVE PLAT DATE: April 18, 2007 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and the following matters must be resolved prior to our approval: Include Section lines and label Sections on Location Map. Delete 9500 E. Tanque Verde Rd. Correct North arrow on pg. 1. Spell out Road of Tanque Verde Rd.on pg. 2. Label approved interior street name on Final Plat. What addresses are existing structures using? Please notify owners that addresses will change when this plat records. jg |
| 04/20/2007 | JOSE ORTIZ | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Denied | April 20, 2007 ACTIVITY NUMBER: S07-048 PROJECT NAME: Marabella PROJECT ADDRESS: 9500 E Tanque Verde Rd PROJECT REVIEWER: Jose E. Ortiz PE, Traffic Engineer Resubmittal Required: Traffic Engineering does not recommend approval of the Tentative Plat; therefore a revised Tentative Plat is required for re-submittal. The following items must be revised or added to the plat. 1. Include a response letter with the next submittal that states how all comments have been addressed. 2. Dimension the width of paving, curbs, and sidewalks. (DS 2-03.2.3.D) 3. Show and label as to size (ie 20x110) both existing and future SVTs (DS 2-03.2.4.M). If the existing and future SVTs are coincident, label it as both existing and future. 4. A private improvement agreement (PIA) will be necessary for the proposed work to be performed within the Right-of-way (decel/right turn lane). An approved tentative plat is required prior to applying for a PIA. Contact the PIA Coordinator for additional PIA information at 791-5550 ext. 1107. 5. The access points shall have 25' radius curb returns. (DS 3-01.0 figure 6) Please call out on plat. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-4259 x76730 or Jose.Ortiz@tucsonaz.gov |
| 04/20/2007 | ROGER HOWLETT | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Approved | DEPARTMENT OF URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN COMMENTS Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT S07-048 Marabella 04/20/07 (XXXX) Tentative Plat () Development Plan (XXXX) Landscape Plan () Revised Plan/Plat () Board of Adjustment () Other CROSS REFERENCE: NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: Bear Canyon Neighborhood Plan GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: COMMENTS DUE BY: 04/27/07 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: () No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment (XXXX) Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions () RCP Proposal Complies with Plan Policies () See Additional Comments Attached () No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: () Resubmittal Required: () Tentative Plat () Development Plan () Landscape Plan () Other REVIEWER: drcorral 791-4505 DATE: 4/19/07 |
| 04/24/2007 | ED ABRIGO | PIMA COUNTY | ASSESSOR | Approved | Office of the Pima County Assessor 115 N. Church Ave. Tucson, Arizona 85701 BILL STAPLES ASSESSOR TO: Oro Valley Planning Department (Fax-742-1022) Attn: Shirley Gay 11000 N. La Canada Dr. Tucson, Az 85737-7015 FROM: Gary Ault, Mapping Supervisor Pima County Assessor's Office Mapping Department DATE: April 24, 2007 RE: Assessor's Review and Comments Regarding Tentative Plat S07-048 MIRABELLA T131535 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * X Plat meets Assessor's Office requirements. _______ Plat does not meet Assessor's Office requirements. COMMENTS: PLEASE MAKE THE FOLLOWING ADJUSTMENTS BY FINAL PLAT STAGE: 1. ADD BEARINGS FOR ALL DIMENSIONS. 2. INDENTIFY ADJOINING AREAS AS EITHER "UNSUBDIVIDED" OR APPROPRIATE M&P 3. SHOW SECTION TIE TO THE SUB. THANK YOU FOR YOUR SUBMITTAL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS PLEASE CALL ROSANNA WERNER AT 740-4390 NOTE: THE ASSESSOR'S CURRENT INVOLVEMENT IN PROCESSING ITS MANUAL MAPS TO DIGITAL FORMAT IS EXPEDITED GREATLY BY EXCHANGE OF DIGITAL DATA. IN THE COURSE OF RECORDING THIS SUBDIVISION YOUR ASSISTANCE IN PROVIDING THIS OFFICE WITH AN AUTOCAD COPY WOULD BE GREATLY APPRECIATED. THANK YOU FOR ANY DIGITAL DATA PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED. ROSANNA WERNER |
| 04/25/2007 | LIZA CASTILLO | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Approved | 4350 E. Irvington Road, Tucson, AZ 85714 Post Office Box 711, Tucson, AZ 85702 WR#179720 April 24, 2007 Obside LLC Attn: Chris Rod P.E. P.O. Box 30185 Tucson, AZ 85751 Dear Chris Rod: SUBJECT: MARABELLA Lots 1-12 S07-048 Tucson Electric Power Company (TEP) has no objection to the preliminary plat submitted for review April 6, 2007. Enclosed is TEP facilities map showing the approximate location of the existing facilities. There is a conflict with the underground service that feeds the existing house. There is a 15’ sewer and utility easement on the parcels to the west of this subdivision, pole line and transformer TVA-11. This should be located within the easement. There is a possible feed from pole #34 along Tanque Verde. The copy of the tentative plat showing where TEP will be placing the aboveground equipment for this subdivision will be mailed to you under separate cover. TEP will provide a preliminary electrical design on the Approved Tentative Plat within fifteen (15) working days upon receipt of the plat. Additional plans necessary for preparation of the design are: building plans including water, electrical, landscape, sidewalk and paving plans. Also, submit the AutoCAD version of the plat on a CD or email to hnoriega@tep.com . Should you have any questions, please contact the area designer, Frank Kilpatrick at (520) 918- 8227. Sincerely, Henrietta Noriega Office Specialist Design/Build Hn Enclosures cc: P. Gehlen, City of Tucson (e-mail) A. Murdock, Tanque Verde 12 LLC (Letter only) J. Necas, Tucson Electric Power |
| 04/27/2007 | ANDY VERA | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Denied | * Lots 10 thru 12 has suffienct street frontage access for curbside refuse service but does not provide service vehicle adequate ability to turnaround to exit this section safely. See DS section 3-01.6.2.C for turnaround requirements. Clarify and demonstrate service area for lots 10-12 if alternative to front of property. * Cul-de-sac does not appear provide sufficient turning radius for service vehicle due to structure in center of cul-de sac. Clarify what the interior turning radius is for center structure. * Lots 1 thru 9 have adequate street frontage acces for APC curbside refuse and recycle service. |
| 04/27/2007 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1) Submit an irrigation plan. LUC 3.7.4.5.C 2) The Native Plant Preservation Plan shall affirm, by a statement on the Plan, conformance with the requirements of the Federal Endangered Species Act and the Arizona Native Plant Law. LUC 3.8.4.5 Revise or add notes as necessary. 3) Per rezoning condition #7 on the tentative plat, all viable canopy trees are required to be salvaged. Revise the plans as necessary to comply. C9-05-24 4) Revise the landscape plans to show the locations for the transplanted barrel cactus. All Protected Native Plants shall be planted in locations able to support their long-term health and survival and shall be planted in densities and configurations to approximate the natural character of the Sonoran Desert. LUC 3.8.6.6.C RESUBMITTAL OF ALL PLANS IS REQUIRED. |
| 04/27/2007 | FRODRIG2 | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Denied | April 27, 2007 To: Chris Rod, Obsido LLC Thru: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Manager City of Tucson Development Services Department ____________________________________ From: Tom Porter, Sr. CEA (520-740-6579), representing the Pima County Departments of Wastewater Management and Environmental Quality Subject: Marabella Lots 1-12 Tentative Plat – 1st Submittal S07-048 The proposed sewer collection lines for the above-referenced project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use. Obtain a letter from the PCWMD's Development Services Section, written within the past 90 days, stating that treatment and conveyance system capacity for the project is available in the downstream public sewerage system and provide a copy of that letter to this office. The required form to request such a letter may be found at: http://www.pima.gov/wwm/forms/docs/CapResponseRequest.pdf. The tentative plat for this project cannot be approved until a copy of this letter has been received by this office. All Sheets: Add the case number, S07-048, to the title block of each sheet. This number should be shown larger or bolder than any cross reference numbers. No wastewater review fees will be charged for sheets where this is the only required revision. Sheet 1: Add a Permitting Note that states: A PROJECT CONSTRUCTION PERMIT MUST BE SECURED FROM PIMA COUNTY WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT BEFORE BEGINNING ANY WORK ON THIS PROJECT. Sheet 1 & 2: Show the public and private sewer lines using different line-types, so that they can readily be distinguished from each other. Also, show and describe examples of these different line types in the legend. The line types for existing and proposed sewer lines should also be easily distinguishable. Sheet 2: The MH information must include the word PUBLIC and the pointing arrows for all of the manholes are missing. Sheet 2: The location of New MH#8 should be moved back to be closer to center of street. The sewer needs to also be extended from MH#8 and ananother manhole added to front Lot 1. Sheet 2: Show the sewer directional flow arrows on plan. Sheet 2: The off-site sewer needs to be shown on plan to the point of existing sewer. The easement information also needs to be shown and by what instrument. Sheet 2: The pipe size of the proposed public sewer must be shown. Sheet 2: Show how the existing buildings on site are sewered. Sheet 2: Consider adding a manhole between MH#6 and MH#5 to avoid running the sewer line under the median. This office will require a revised set of bluelines, and a response letter, addressing these comments. Additional comments may be made during the review of these documents. Pima County Code Title 13.20.030.A.2 requires that a wastewater review fee be paid for each submittal of the development plan. The fee for the first submittal is $166 plus $50 per sheet. For the second submittal, the review fee is $50 per sheet. For all subsequent submittals, the review fee is $39 per sheet. The next submittal of this project will be the 2nd submittal. A check for the review fee of this submittal in the amount of $100(made out to PIMA COUNTY TREASURER) must accompany the revised set of bluelines and response letter. If the number of sheets changes, please adjust the review fee accordingly. If you have any questions regarding the above mentioned comments, please contact me . CC: Project File |
| 04/27/2007 | FRODRIG2 | COT NON-DSD | REAL ESTATE | Approved | S07-048 Marabella: Tentative Plat Review - No comment. |
| 05/01/2007 | PGEHLEN1 | OTHER AGENCIES | PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS | Passed | |
| 05/01/2007 | PGEHLEN1 | TUCSON WATER NEW AREA DEVELOPMENT | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 05/01/2007 | ROBERT YOUNG | PIMA COUNTY | PIMA CTY - DEV REVIEW | Passed | |
| 05/02/2007 | GLENN HICKS | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Approved | DATE: April 30, 2007 TO: Ferne Rodriguez, Development Services FROM: Glenn Hicks Parks and Recreation 791-4873 ext. 215 Glenn.Hicks@tucsonaz.gov CC: Patricia Gehlen SUBJECT: S07-048 Marabella: Tentative Plat Review(4-2-07) Staff has no comments. |
| 05/04/2007 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: Marabella Tentative Plat 9500 E. Tanque Verde Road S07-048 TRANSMITTAL DATE: May 4, 2007 DUE DATE: April 27, 2007 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. Section 4.1.7.1, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a tentative plat. If, at the end of that time, the tentative plat has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this tentative plat is April 01, 2008. 2. A separate Special Application, review, and approval for the Scenic Corridor Zone (SCZ) overlay is required. For more information the applicant must contact Patricia Gehlen at 520-837-4919. The application form is on the DSD website at http://www.tucsonaz.gov/dsd/Forms_Fees___Maps/Applications/Overlay_Zone_Application.pdf 3. Provide a separate letter explaining how all Rezoning conditions have been met. 4. D.S. 2-03.2.1.C All lettering and dimensions will be the equivalent of twelve (0.12) point or greater in size. There are numerous pieces of text that do not meet the twelve (0.12) point requirement. There are also numerous places where text is placed over text which makes it difficult to read. 5. D.S. 2-03.2.1.D Provide a location map that identifies all the subdivisions within the 1 mile area, reference the subdivision plats by book and page. Label the section corners on the location map. Show the City of Tucson's jurisdictional limits on the plan. 6. D.S. 2-03.2.2.B.5 List the proposed use as ""FAMILY DWELLING "G", SUBJECT TO: SEC. 3.5.7.1.E, .F, .G, AND .H. 7. D.S. 2-03.2.2.B.7 Revise General Note 5 to include "Sec. 2.8.3, Major Streets and Routes (MS&R) Setback Zone". 8. D.S. 2-03.2.4.C The label for Common Area B has text written over it. Clarify. 9. D.S. 2-03.2.4.D Label the zoning for all adjacent properties. 10. D.S. 2-03.2.4.G The provided street cross sections do not meet the minimum standards of D.S. 3-01, Figure 1. See DSD Engineering comments. 11. D.S. 2-03.2.4.G Street access is required to all proposed lots of the plat. Provide street access to the three (3) southern lots. 12. D.S. 2-03.2.4.G Clearly indicate where the required visitors parking is located on the plat and the number provided. Per D.S. 3-01.0 Figure 1, one (1) visitor parking space is required per dwelling unit, therefore 12 visitor parking spaces are required. Provide a parking calculation on the plat. 13. D.S. 2-03.2.4.G A sidewalk is required on both sides of the proposed private street, Per D.S. 3-01.0 Figure 1. 14. D.S. 2-03.2.4.G The proposed D.G. Pedestrian Path does not meet the requirements for a sidewalk, D.S. 2-08.5.1.C. 15. D.S. 2-03.2.4.G If the proposed sidewalk location is to remain as shown on the plat then a pedestrian access easement will be required. 16. D.S. 2-03.2.4.J There is a Blanket Electrical & Telephone easement called out on the plat. Please clarify this easement, as zoning will not allow any structures to be built within an easement. 17. D.S. 2-03.2.4.J Easements will be required for the proposed sewer and water lines that are connecting to existing sewer and water service located within the Castle Rock development. These easements must be done under a separate instrument not recorded with this plat. These easements must be recorded prior to approval of this plat. 18. D.S. 2-03.2.4.M The proposed building setbacks shown along the west property line on the plat are incorrect. Adjacent to the RX1 zone the setback is 20'-0" and adjacent to the R1 zone the setback is 6'-0" or 2/3 the height of the proposed exterior building wall, which ever is greatest. Per D.S. 2-03.2.4.M the zoning setbacks should not be delineated on the plat. 19. There are three (3) EXISTING STRUCTURES shown on the plan. Clearly indicate on the site plan what each structure is i.e. single family dwelling, accessory structure. Provide individual site plans for lots 9 & 12 which provide the minimum requirements for a residential site plan so that zoning can verify that the existing structures can remain as shown. It appears that the structure on lot 12 is an accessory structure, per LUC 3.2.5.2.A an accessory structure is no allowed on a lot by itself. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4956. C:\planning\cdrc\tentativeplat\S07-048tpca.doc RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised tentative plat, and additional requested documents. |
| 06/08/2007 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES June 8, 2007 Chris Rod, P.E. Obsido LLC P.O. Box 30185 Tucson, Arizona 85751 Subject: S07-048 Marabella Tentative Plat Dear Chris: Your submittal of April 2, 2007 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a DETAILED cover letter explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLACKLINES MUST BE FOLDED 9 Copies Revised Tentative Plat (Engineering, Addressing, Fire, Traffic, Wastewater, Landscape, ESD, Zoning, DSD) 4 Copies Revised Landscape Plan (Zoning, Landscape, Zoning, DSD) 2 Copies Revised NPPO Plan (Landscape, DSD) 2 Copies Revised Drainage Report (Engineering, DSD) Should you have any questions, please call me at 791-5608 extension 1179. Sincerely, Patricia Gehlen CDRC Manager All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: 574-3398 Tp-resubmittal |