Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Plan Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: CORE REVIEW
Plan Number - S07-040
Review Name: CORE REVIEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 03/14/2007 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 03/14/2007 | JIM EGAN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | |
| 04/03/2007 | LIZA CASTILLO | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Approved | subject: Mission Hill S07-040 Tucson Electric Power (TEP) has no objections to the tentative plat submitted for Mission Hill on 03/14/07. Liza Castillo, Right of Way Agent Land Management Tucson Electric Power Co. Unisource Energy Gas & Unisource Energy Electric PH: (520) 917-8745 RightFax: (520) 545-1416 lcastillo@tep.com <mailto:lcastillo@tep.com> |
| 04/06/2007 | ROGER HOWLETT | COT NON-DSD | URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN | Approved | DEPARTMENT OF URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT S07-040 Mission Hill 04/04/07 (XXXX) Tentative Plat ( ) Development Plan (XXXX) Landscape Plan ( ) Revised Plan/Plat ( ) Board of Adjustment ( ) Other CROSS REFERENCE: C9-60-39 & C12-80-29 NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: "A" Mountain Neighborhood Plan GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: Mission Road COMMENTS DUE BY: 04/11/07 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: ( ) No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment ( ) Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions ( ) RCP Proposal Complies With Plan Policies ( ) See Additional Comments Attached (XXXX) No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: 09/14/05 ( ) Resubmittal Required: ( ) Tentative Plat ( ) Development Plan ( ) Landscape Plan ( ) Other - Color Renderings REVIEWER: DCR 791-4505 DATE: 04/04/07 |
| 04/10/2007 | JOSE ORTIZ | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Denied | April 10, 2007 ACTIVITY NUMBER: S07-040 PROJECT NAME: Mission Hill PROJECT ADDRESS: 1602 W 33RD ST PROJECT REVIEWER: Jose E. Ortiz PE, Traffic Engineer Resubmittal Required: Traffic Engineering does not recommend approval of the Tentative Plat; therefore a revised Tentative Plat is required for re-submittal. The following items must be revised or added to the plat. 1. Include a response letter with the next submittal that states how all comments have been addressed. 2. Provide enough information/dimensions to knuckle design along San Rafael and San Jose Drive to ensure that designs will meet standards. 3. Ensure that adequate right of way will be acquired to provide enough space to accommodate the three proposed knuckles along with the connecting roadways (i.e. San Rafael Ave). 4. A private improvement agreement (PIA) will be necessary for the proposed work to be performed within the Right-of-way. An approved tentative plat is required prior to applying for a PIA. Contact the PIA Coordinator for additional PIA information at 791-5550 ext. 1107. 5. Call out for 25' radius curb returns along Mission Road and the proposed access roadway. (DS 3-01.0 figure 6) If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-4259 x76730 or Jose.Ortiz@tucsonaz.gov |
| 04/11/2007 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1) The site is subject to the provisions of the Environmental Resource Zone (ERZ). Revise all plans to comply with the regulations. See comments for T06SA00259. LUC 2.8.2.11 2) Revise the plans for basin 2 to comply with DS 10-01.0. Basins are required to comply with the technical requirements and guidelines for basin slopes found on p. 78. Slopes for basin less than three feet deep are to be no steeper than 2:1. RESUBMITTAL OF ALL PLANS IS REQUIRED. SCZ, HDZ, and ERZ approval are required prior to tentative plat approval. |
| 04/11/2007 | KAY MARKS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Approv-Cond | 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 KAY MARKS ADDRESSING OFFICIAL PH: 740-6480 FAX #: 740-6370 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL SUBJECT: S07-040 MISSION HILL/TENTATIVE PLAT DATE: 4/10/07 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and we hereby approve this project. NOTE: ON FINAL PLAT: Change S05-023 to S07-040. 2.) Label approved interior street name. ***The Pima County Addressing Section can use digital CAD drawing files when submitted with your final plat Mylar. These CAD files can be submitted through Pima County Addressing. The digital CAD drawing files expedite the addressing and permitting processes when we are able to insert this digital data into the County’s Geographic Information System. Your support is greatly appreciated.*** es |
| 04/11/2007 | ANDY VERA | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Approved | * Street frontage access for lots1 thru 24 and 27 thru 45 okay for APC curbside refuse/recycle service. * Lots 25 and 26 will be accessible for curbside collection from San Rafael Ave. as shown. |
| 04/13/2007 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: David Rivera Principal Planner PROJECT: S07-040 Mission Hill - lots 1-45, Common Areas A - D Tentative Plat TRANSMITTAL DATE: April 13, 2007 DUE DATE: April 11, 2007 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. The Zoning Review Section approves the tentative plat for this subdivision, subject to the following changes on the executed tentative plat. However, should there be any changes requested by other CDRC members, the Zoning Review Section approval is void, and we request copies of the revised tentative plat to verify that those changes do not affect any zoning requirements. 2. The street building setback along San Rafael and San Jose must be revised to reflect that the setback is measured from the face of the curb at the two Street Knuckles where the a parking lane is not allowed. Please revise as required. (Discussed this issue with Dan Castro) 3. List the new case number S07-040 and remove the old case number. 4. Remove the building setbacks labeled as 5.5' and H-15.5' from the plot layout details on sheet 3. These setbacks are not applicable to this development. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call David Rivera, (520) 791-5608. C:\planning\cdrc\tentativeplat\S07040tpca.doc |
| 04/18/2007 | FRODRIG2 | COT NON-DSD | REAL ESTATE | Denied | S07-040 Mission Hill: Core Review - Existing R/W dedicated by M/P Bk. 34 Pg. 20 needs to be vacated prior approval of plat. An application for this action was received in this office 4/13/07 and is being processed with work number RES 2007-073. Per Tentative Plat, 2/27/07, request clarification concerning the rise gradient and a possible off-site slope easement @ NWC of proposed San Jose & San Rafael. |
| 04/18/2007 | FRODRIG2 | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Denied | April 17, 2007 To: Chuck Martin, Rick Engineering Thru: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Manager City of Tucson Development Services Department ____________________________________ From: Tom Porter (520-740-6579), representing the Pima County Departments of Wastewater Management and Environmental Quality Subject: Mission Hill Lots 1-45 & Common Areas “A-1”-“A-2”,”B-1”-“B-3”,”C-1”-“C-2” &”D” Tentative Plat-1st Submittal S07-040 The proposed tentative plat for the above-referenced project has been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use. Obtain a letter from the PCWMD's Development Services Section, written within the past 90 days, stating that treatment and conveyance system capacity for the project is available in the downstream public sewerage system and provide a copy of that letter to this office. The required form to request such a letter may be found at: http://www.pima.gov/wwm/forms/docs/CapResponseRequest.pdf. The tentative plat for this project can not be approved until a copy of this letter has been received by this office. All Sheets: Add the case number, S07-040, to the title block of each sheet. This number should be shown larger or bolder than any cross reference numbers. No wastewater review fees will be charged for sheets where this is the only required revision. Sheet 1: Revise General Note No. 13 to read as follows: THE ON-SITE SANITARY SEWAGE COLLECTION LINES WILL BE PUBLIC AND DESIGNED AND CONSTRUCTED TO PIMA COUNTY WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT STANDARDS. ALL BUILDING CONNECTION SEWERS WILL BE PRIVATELY MAINTAINED. Sheet 1:Add a Permitting Note that states: A PROJECT CONSTRUCTION PERMIT MUST BE SECURED FROM PIMA COUNTY WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT BEFORE BEGINNING ANY WORK ON THIS PROJECT. Sheet 2: Approval for abandonment of 8” public sewer shown on plan must be obtained from PCWMD. Sheet 2: & 3: The sewer directional flow arrows need to be shown on both the proposed and existing public sewers. Sheets 2 & 3: The slope & length of proposed public sewer shown from MH 1 to MH 2(which is not labeled and needs to be) is marked differently in each sheet. Sheets 2 & 3: The inverts shown on plan for existing manholes 7183-70, 7183-69 and 1799-26 are significantly different from PCWMD as built inverts of record. Revise and change connecting sewer manhole inverts as needed. This office will require a revised set of bluelines, and a response letter, addressing these comments. Additional comments may be made during the review of these documents. Pima County Code Title 13.20.030.A.2 requires that a wastewater review fee be paid for each submittal of the tentative plat. The fee for the first submittal is $166 plus $50 per sheet. For the second submittal, the review fee is $50 per sheet. For all subsequent submittals, the review fee is $39 per sheet. The next submittal of this project will be the 2nd submittal. A check for the review fee of this submittal in the amount of $150.00 (made out to PIMA COUNTY TREASURER) must accompany the revised set of bluelines and response letter. If the number of sheets changes, please adjust the review fee accordingly. If you have any questions regarding the above mentioned comments, please contact me. CC: Project File |
| 06/05/2007 | ELIZABETH EBERBACH | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | TO: Patricia Gehlen; CDRC Coordinator SUBJECT: Mission Hill Tentative Plat core review & Overlay Engineering Review LOCATION: T14S R13E Section 22 REVIEWER: Elizabeth Eberbach, PE CASE NUMBER: S07-040, (S05-023 4th submittal) SUMMARY: The revised Tentative Plat, revised Drainage Report, geotechnical addendum, Landscape documents, title report, SCZ/HDZ/ERR Overlay response, and Tentative Plat response letter were received by Engineering. Engineering has reviewed the received items and does not recommend approval of the Tentative Plat or the Drainage Report at this time. The Drainage Report and grading sheets were reviewed for Tentative Plat purposes only. HDZ SUMMARY: HDZ calculation is acceptable. There are remaining HDZ grading comments that need to be addressed. (See comments 11 and 13) SCZ SUMMARY: Scenic Corridor Zone design remains acceptable to Engineering for Tentative Plat purposes. PROJECT SAC SUMMARY: This subdivision project is adjacent to an ERZ wash named San Juan Wash. There are proposed drainage improvement development encroachment into the San Juan ERZ wash. The existing San Juan ERZ is within a FEMA Special Flood Hazard Zone AE and consists of an existing constructed channel, approximately 5 feet deep and bottom width 60 feet, with sandy earthen bottom that has grade control structures and 1.5:1(H:V) shotcrete side slopes with toedowns. A CLOMR has been obtained from FEMA, as the jurisdictional flow is proposed as being contained within the channel. Proposed encroachment includes proposed bleed pipes with flap gates for outlets from two of the proposed basins, and shotcrete weir outlet / trail crossing the bank protection along the south side of the project. Engineering recommends SAC scheduling after trail or other easement clarifications are addressed. (See comments 3, 6, 12, and 13) DRAINAGE REPORT COMMENTS: 1) City of Tucson Development Standards (DS) Section No.10-02.2.3.1.4.G, 2-03.2.4.L.4&6: Regarding the San Juan Wash Zone AE FEMA floodplain which is partially on this project, provide updated FEMA status upon resubmittal. 2) DS Sec.10-02.2.3.1.5.C: Discuss and explain elevations for basin 3, bottom elevation and bleed pipe invert at basin outlet. There is only a 0.2% grade along the bottom of this basin. Minimum grade required per recent directive is 1% or 0.5% with as-built showing elevations at 10-ft grid intervals. Revise basin 3 bottom elevations. 3) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.L.5: This following comment remains until acceptance of proposed drainage improvements are accepted by offsite owner: Verification will need to be provided that any drainage solutions, which occur outside the boundaries of the development plan area, are constructed with adjacent owners' permission. (Additional notarized documentation of that approval will be submitted with the drainage report.) Please be aware that the concrete weir outlets which are proposed to cross the maintenance road are not necessarily accepted. The proposed designs must meet SCZ and ERZ requirements. The SCZ and ERZ submittals must be submitted prior to next submittal of the Tentative Plat. Applicability of ERZ is dependent on CLOMR status. If the structures are approved, a drainage maintenance or construction easement will be needed at the south side of the project for those areas of drainage structures that are proposed outside of the property boundaries, including the flap-gated pipe outlets. 4) DS Sec.11-01.10.5: Size and provide interceptor swale section on a drainage exhibit for top of slopes for lots 26-38. 5) DS Sec.2-03.2.4.L: Basin 2 is showing 1:1(H:V) slopes that are not consistent with the geotechnical recommendations (addendum states maximum slope at 2:1(H:V). Assure capacity of basin is provided after revising slopes, associated runout, and providing any applicable setbacks. 6) Provide statement in Drainage Report regarding whether there are toedowns and key-in for the existing bank protection and whether the existing bank protection is sufficient for 100-year scour event. TENTATIVE PLAT COMMENTS: 7) DS Sec.2-03.2.4.L.4: Show feasibility of lot layout by addressing the following comments: a) For lots 26-28, clarify proposed building pad/layouts to show feasibility of product on these lots given the slope runout / change of grades on the north sides of these lots, adjusting for revision to slope grades per geotechnical recommendations. b) Basin 2 is showing slopes that are not consistent with the geotechnical addendum recommendations. After revising slopes, associated runout, and providing any applicable setbacks, lot 21 may not be feasible. Revise lot layout and basin 2 accordingly. 8) DS Sec.2-03.2.4.1.a: Regarding San Jose Drive and San Raphael Avenue, address the following: a) Show full street improvements for San Jose Drive as this street shall be fully built for the project, or show alignment through from cul-de-sac to 33rd Street. b) On detail B/3, proposed grade in San Jose Drive is not safe for a sharp 90% turn and therefore proposed elevation of 15 is about 5 feet to low. Provide design grades in San Jose Drive and revise detail B/3. Interceptor swales are required at tops of slopes; show in cross sections. 9) DS Sec.2-03.2.4.L.4: In order to show feasibility of the RCP lots on this HDZ site, the typical lot grading detail will help to show conformance with the geotechnical recommendations and other restrictions including setbacks. Geotechnical addendum did not change sideyard setbacks. Address the remaining comments: a) Geotechnical Engineering Report indicates a minimum of 5 feet, yet sideyards are dimensioned at 3 feet. For the typical lot grading details and lot setback details, clarify minimum side yard setback. Clarify how distances for minimum setbacks provide appropriate area for drainage swales, mechanical equipment, A/C units, slope setbacks for screen walls, slope run-outs, and general access. b) DS Sec.9-04.3.B.4: There is proposed pad elevations and cut slopes at rear of lots 26 through 36 that in some cases are close to 15 feet of elevation change with only 20 feet of runout. Feasibility of these proposed lots shall be shown on the Tentative Plat. Address the following: i) Provide cross sections that reflect maximum slope grade of 2:1(H:V) and provide sufficient area for building pad. ii) Check driveway slope grades for lots on north side of proposed street. Label maximum driveway slopes on typical grading detail. 10) DS Sec.2-03.2.3.C: Clarify in response letter whether there are no fiber optic cable lines at the site. 11) DS Sec.10-02.14.2.6: Label 2:1(H:V) slopes as handplaced rip rap with filter fabric. 12) DS Sec.10-02.2.3.1.5.C: Label bleeder pipe for Basin 3 with flap gate or other design as acceptable to TDOT. 13) DS Sec.2-03.2.4.K: Clarify the proposed erosion protection shown in the remaining 9-ft in the trail corridor in detail E/2. In HDZ areas handplaced rip rap is required. Label type of easement (private slope maintenance easement) outside of the common area where the key-in extends into the lot property line. A meeting is required prior to resubmittal. Submit the revised Tentative Plat, the revised drainage report, authorization document for flap gates, copy of geotechnical report bound with addendum, and response letter. Call to schedule an appointment to go over these comments, and if you have any questions, please call me at 837-4934. Elizabeth Eberbach, PE Civil Engineer Engineering Division Development Services |
| 06/06/2007 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES June 6, 2007 Chuck Martin Rick Engineering 1745 East River Road, Suite 101 Tucson, Arizona 85718 Subject: S07-040 Mission HillTentative Plat Dear Chuck: Your submittal of March 14, 2007 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a DETAILED cover letter explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLACKLINES MUST BE FOLDED 6 Copies Revised Tentative Plat (Traffic, Landscape, Real Estate, Wastewater, Engineering, DSD) 3 Copies Revised Landscape Plan (Landscape, Engineering, DSD) 2 Copies Revised Drainage Report (Engineering, DSD) 2 Copies Bound Geotechnical Report (Engineering, DSD) Should you have any questions, please call me at 791-5608 extension 1179. Sincerely, Patricia Gehlen CDRC Manager All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: 322-6956 Tp-resubmittal |