Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Plan Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Plan Number - S07-037
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 07/11/2007 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 07/18/2007 | CDRC1 | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Approv-Cond | July 18, 2007 To: Ryan Stucki, P.E. Stantec Consulting Inc. Thru: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Project Manager City of Tucson Development Services Department ____________________________________ From: Tom Porter, Sr. Civil Eng. Assistant (520-740-6579), representing the Pima County Departments of Wastewater Management and Environmental Quality Subject: Liberty At Stome Bluff Lots 1 through 125 Tentative Plat - 2nd Submittal S07-037 The proposed sewer collection lines for the above-referenced project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use. 1. Sheet 2: The invert for MH#4 is lower then for MH#3. Show how the sewer from this project will flow into the proposed sewer along Wingate. The inverts shown on this plan need to demonstrate gravity flow. 2. Sheet 10: Show the rim and invert elevations for all the manholes and sewer directional flow arrows. The pipe size should be called out further north along Wingate and Linderbrook Dr.. Subject to the above, the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality and Wastewater Management Department hereby approve the above referenced submittal of the tentative or preliminary plat. The required revision(s) may be shown on the Mylars. Please note the following: Approval of the above referenced submittal does not authorize the construction of public or private sewer collection lines, or water distribution lines. Prior to the construction of such features, a Construction Authorization (Approval To Construct) may need to be obtained from the Pima County Environmental Quality. Also, air quality activity permits must be secured by the developer or prime contractor from the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality before constructing, operating or engaging in an activity which may cause or contribute to air pollution. If you have any questions regarding the above mentioned comments, please do not hesitate to contact me. CC: Project file |
| 07/26/2007 | FRODRIG2 | LANDFILL | ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES | Approved | |
| 07/26/2007 | ROGER HOWLETT | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Denied | DEPARTMENT OF URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN COMMENTS Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT S07-037 Liberty at Stone Bluff (XXXX) Tentative Plat () Development Plan (XXXX) Landscape Plan () Revised Plan/Plat () Board of Adjustment () Other CROSS REFERENCE: C9-86-40 NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: South Pantano GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: COMMENTS DUE BY: 08/08/07 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: () No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment () Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions () RCP Proposal Complies with Plan Policies () See Additional Comments Attached () No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: (XXXX) Resubmittal Required: (XXXX) Tentative Plat () Development Plan () Landscape Plan (XXXX) Other – Color Elevations, Photos REVIEWER: drcorral 791-4505 DATE: 6/25/07 The Design Guidelines Manual states that side and rear building facades should be built with attention to architectural character and detail comparable to the front façade, particularly if rear and side facades are visible from streets or adjacent properties. Enhancement can include design treatments such a pop outs, color variation, etc. Massing of proposed structures to existing structures will also be a part of this review. The tentative plat should identify the height of existing structures that surround the project site. Please submit plans showing how the RCP will comply with these design requirements. Specifically, how the units visible form the right-of-way along Wingate Boulevard and Irvington Road will add architectural treatment to sides and/or rear. Photos, dimensioned elevations, or a combination of both must be submitted Lots that incorporate walls that abut amenities such as designated open space areas, common areas, and trail systems, should meet the following criteria: the masonry portion of the wall does not exceed four (4) feet, eight (8) inches in height, except for pillars, with one (1) foot six (6) inch wrought iron or other similar open fencing materials on top. This is to provide security to those using the facility placing the “eyes of the community” on these areas. Please submit a detail on the tentative plat to indicate compliance with this requirement for units 9 through 42 that abut the common areas. |
| 07/31/2007 | KAROL ARAGONEZ | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Karol Aragonez Planner PROJECT: S07-037 Liberty at Stone Bluff Tentative Plat Resubmittal TRANSMITTAL DATE: July 25, 2007 DUE DATE: August 8, 2007 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. Provide a separate response letter detailing compliance with rezoning conditions. 2. Previous Comment: Per final plat C12-90-4, prior to development of lot 6 and 7 a methane study will be conducted by a qualified expert. If methane is found in significant concentrations to warrant a health hazard, as defined by the Arizona Department of Health Services, the following requirements must be met: a) Prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy for any building and approved methane gas control and mitigation system shall have been installed per plans certified by a registered professional engineer appointed by and/or acceptable to the Arizona Department of Health Services, the Pima County Health Department, and the City of Tucson. b) Prior to issuance of a building permit, a master methane control plan for the subdivision shall be reviewed and approved by the Arizona Department of Health Services, the Pima County Health Department, and the City of Tucson. c) At the time either lot 6 or lot 7 is developed, the builder/long term lessee or successors of lot 6 and/or lot 7 jointly or independently shall be responsible for monitoring and installing appropriate methane mitigation measures as required by the Arizona Department of Health Services and the Pima County Health Department, if the source of methane is located on the buyer's/long term lessee's or successor's property. d) At the time either lot 6 or lot 7 is developed, the builder/long term lessee or successors of lot 6 and/or lot 7 jointly or independently shall provide methane easements for the installation of appropriate measures to mitigate methane migration from the solid waste disposal site to the east of the rezoning site, as determined necessary by the Arizona Department of Health Services, the Pima County Health Department, and the City of Tucson Department of Environmental Services. General Notes from C12-90-4 Based on the previous comments and the outcome of the required study please provide a note on the tentative plat indicating compliance. Provide date of study, name of qualified expert who conducted study, and results, and date of approval by the Arizona Department of Health Services, the Pima County Health Department, and the City of Tucson. If no methane was found then state so. If methane is present then the note will indicate lots affected and method of mitigation as indicated in the above requirements from final plat C12-90-4. 3. Please add the record of survey's case number issued by the City of Tucson in the lower right corner of all pages of the tentative plat, landscape plan, NPPO and any other related sheets. 4. CC&Rs were not found with submittal packet. Review of CC&Rs can be done at the final plat stage. 5. Previous Comment: Mechanical Equipment Detail could not be found on landscape plan as noted in general note 41. Please provide on the tentative plat a detail as to how screening of the mechanical equipment is done. If ground mounted and screened by property walls please provide note stating that. If roof mounted provide a detail showing how screening will be architecturally integrated with the overall design of the RCP. LUC 3.6.1.4.A.9 Your response was that there will be no mechanical equipment. Please explain how the dwelling units are to be cooled in the summer. Cooling units are either ground mounted or placed in the roof. Please provide either a note on the tentative plat or a detail of screening. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Karol Aragonez, (520) 837-4960. KAA S:\zoning review\karol\planning\cdrc\tentativeplat\S07-037tpr.doc RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised tentative plat, CC&R's and additional requested documents. |
| 08/01/2007 | KAY MARKS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Denied | 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 KAY MARKS ADDRESSING OFFICIAL PH: 740-6480 FAX #: 740-6370 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL SUBJECT: S07-037 LIBERTY AT STONE BLUFF/REVISED TENTATIVE PLAT DATE: 8/01/07 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and the following matters must be resolved prior to our approval: The resubdivision information on all the title blocks must be a resubdivision of the plat Wingate MP 43/66 not a record of survey. The record of survey may be listed under the plat information but not a resubdivision of. Add Road to Full Moon Bluff on pgs. 1 & 8. es |
| 08/02/2007 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1) Basin slopes are required to have slopes no steeper than 4:1 where depths are three feet or greater. Slopes for basins less than three feet are to be no steeper than 3:1 for unprotected slopes and 2: 1 for protected. DS 10-01.4 Note the depth of Basins A & C. The vertical depth is to be measured from the top of slope at lowest point on basin rim to toe of slope at lowest point in basin. (p.78) 2) Grading, hydrology, and landscape structural plans are to be integrated to make maximum use of site storm water runoff for supplemental on-site irrigation purposes. Identify additional water harvesting areas on the landscape plans. In order to make maximum use of runoff, as many of the landscape areas as possible should be depressed and runoff should be routed to these depressed areas where possible. LUC 3.7.4.3.B 3) Include the Native Plant Preservation Plans in the sheet index on L0-01. with correct numbering, or revise the title sheet. 4) Revise the Summary of Native Plant Inventory and Mitigation Requirements on the landscape plans and the Native Plant Summary on the NPP plans to agree and add additional plants where necessary. DS 2-15.3.4.B RESUBMITTAL OF ALL PLANS IS REQUIRED. |
| 08/03/2007 | LAITH ALSHAMI | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | Laith Alshami, Engineering and Floodplain Review. 08/03/2007, TO: Patricia Gehlen FROM: Laith Alshami, P.E. CDRC Engineering SUBJECT: Liberty at Stone Bluff S07-037, T14S, R15E, SECTION 34 RECEIVED: Tentative Plat, Landscape Plan and Drainage Report on July 11, 2007 The subject submittal has been reviewed and it can not be approved at this time. Address the following comments before review can continue. Prepare a detailed response that explains the revisions that were made and references the exact location in the drainage report and on the Tentative Plat where the revisions were made, Responses such as "Acknowledged or done" are not acceptable: Drainage Report: 1. Verify compliance with the approved Master Drainage Report and Master Grading Plan for the Wingate Master Plan. This comment was made previously. The response to this comment (acknowledged) is not satisfactory 2. Requirement #15 of the City of Tucson Department of Transportation Memo dated September 19, 1986, requires the Owner/Developer to install all street improvements in Irvington Road. These improvements appear to include a box culvert at Irvington Road/Wingate Wash crossing. Provide all design calculations. If the said improvements are not required by TDOT, submit a written verification from TDOT. 3. Ensure that the subject development has all weather access. 4. The drainage report does not address detention basin and drainage structure maintenance requirements and responsibility. Additionally, provide the proposed drainage structure maintenance checklist that addresses all drainage structures including the retention/detention basins. Revise the report accordingly. We also recommend including a copy of the check list in the CC & R's to allow the Home Owners Association access to the list and facilitate their maintenance responsibility. 5. Address in the report the waterharvesting requirements for this project. 6. Provide the design calculations for all required splash pads/erosion control structures. 7. It is not clear from where the erosion setback line is set. Clarify. Tentative Plat: 1. Verify compliance with the approved Master Drainage Report and Master Grading Plan for the Wingate Master Plan. 2. Requirement #15 of the City of Tucson Department of Transportation Memo dated September 19, 1986, requires the Owner/Developer to install all street improvements in Irvington Road. These improvements appear to include a box culvert at Irvington Road/Wingate Wash crossing, street widening, and curb and sidewalk. Revise the plat accordingly including Detail 1/5. 3. According to the Major and Street Plan and Map, all MS & R streets require 6' sidewalks. Revise cross-section Detail 2/3 and 3/3 to reflect this information. If Mayor and Council are considering removing Wingate Boulevard from the MS & R, provide a written verification of that. 4. Drainage structures and public right of way, as shown on the plan, can not be within the erosion setback line. Revise the plan accordingly. According to Stantec's response to this comment, riprap is proposed to protect the roadway embankment, which is acceptable as long as the riprap is grouted properly. 5. Ensure that lots 43-125 and lot 1 meet the requirements of differential grading. Revise the proposed grades or verify compliance with the requirements of D.S. 11-01.8.0. (Fills). 6. Show all applicable setback lines, such as erosion hazard, floodplain retention/detention basins, etc. as required by (D.S. 2-03.2.4.M.). 7. Revise the Tentative Plat in accordance with the drainage report revisions. Landscape Plan: Landscape Plan is acceptable pertaining to Engineering and Floodplain Review. RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Revised Tentative Plat and Drainage Report |
| 08/09/2007 | JOSE ORTIZ | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Approved | |
| 08/10/2007 | FRODRIG2 | COT NON-DSD | REAL ESTATE | Denied | Andy Steuart S07-037 Liberty At Stone Bluff: Resubmittal - CDRC - Tentative Plat Review - Request 3 items: -annotation " East 33', Lot 5 by Separate Instrument 33' R/W Dedicated by Final Plat" be changed to "33' R/W Dedicated by final Plat." -in the Legal Block on the Lower rt. hand corner of Sheet 1 of 10, change the line "A Resubdivison of Wingate Lot 7 as Adjusted per Book 57, Survey Maps Page 44" be changed to ""A Resubdivision of Wingate Lot 6 & 7 Per Maps and Plats Book 43 Page 66 as Adjusted per Book 57, Survey Maps Page 44." -ensure Subject Resubdivision is conveyed to Owner/Developer from the St. Land Dept. prior final plat is accepted by Mayor and Council. |
| 09/13/2007 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES September 13, 2007 Ryan R. Stucki, P.E. Stantec Consulting, Inc. 201 North Bonita Avenue, Suite 101 Tucson, Arizona 85745 Subject: S07-037 Liberty at Stone Bluff Tentative Plat Dear Ryan: Your submittal of July 11, 2007 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a DETAILED cover letter explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLACKLINES MUST BE FOLDED 9 Copies Revised Tentative Plat (Zoning, DUPD, Addressing, Landscape, Real Estate, Parks and Recreation, Wastewater, Engineering, DSD) 6 Copies Revised Landscape Plan (Zoning, DUPD, Landscape, Parks and Recreation, Engineering, DSD) 2 Copies Revised NPPO Plan (Landscape, DSD) 3 Copies Color Elevations and photos (Zoning, DUPD, DSD) 2 Copies Drainage Report (Engineering, DSD) Should you have any questions, please call me at 837-4919. Sincerely, Patricia Gehlen CDRC Manager All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: 750-7470 Tp-resubmittal |
| 09/13/2007 | GLENN HICKS | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Denied | DATE: September 12, 2007 TO: DSD_CDRC@ tucsonaz.gov FROM: Glenn Hicks Parks and Recreation 791-4873 ext. 215 Glenn.Hicks@tucsonaz.gov SUBJECT: S07-037 Liberty at Stone Bluff: Tentative Plat Review(7-07) Denied. Please indicate a public, non-motorized recreational trail easement corresponding with Common Area "B" is being dedicated. |