Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Plan Review Detail

Plan Number: S07-022
Parcel: Unknown

Address:
110 S CHURCH AV

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: FINAL PLAT REVIEW

Plan Number - S07-022
Review Name: FINAL PLAT REVIEW
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
02/12/2007 FERNE RODRIGUEZ START PLANS SUBMITTED Completed
02/12/2007 CHRISTY FOREMAN BUILDING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied CITY OF TUCSON DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
STRUCTURAL REVIEW COMMENTS

DATE: 2-12-07
ACTIVITY NUMBER: S07-022
PROJECT NAME: La Placita Office Condominiums
PROJECT ADDRESS: 110 S. Church Ave.
ARCHITECT / ENGINEER: Ashby Surveying and Drafting
PROJECT REVIEWER: Christy Foreman


TRANSMIT ORIGINAL DRAWINGS WITH NEXT SUBMITTAL.

PLEASE CALL AT 791-5550 X1108 OR EMAIL AT CHRISTY.FOREMA1@TUCSONAZ.GOV IF YOU CARE TO DISCUSS.

1) The following expired permits need to be resolved by renewing and paying for inspections.
T03OT01869 - Sign inspection, Suite #3350
T00BU02053 - Porch addition
T01PL01168 - Replace sewer line
T01OT01067 - Suite #4199 sign inspection
T02CM02090 - Suite #4199 Tenant Improvement - Office
T01CM03614 - Suite #4030 Tenant Improvement - "B" Occupancy Studio

2) This facility can not be justified per unlimited area requirements, therefore building separations / allowable square footages need to be clarified in reference to the condominium property lines.
02/22/2007 DAVID MANN COT NON-DSD FIRE Approved
02/27/2007 LIZA CASTILLO UTILITIES TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER Approved SUBJECT: LA PLACITA OFFICE CONDOMINIUMS

S07-022



Tucson Electric Power Company (TEP) approves the Final Plat submitted
February 09, 2007 for the subject project.

Please forward any resubmittals of the final plat to this office.



Electric service will be provided to this subdivision in accordance with
the rules and regulations approved by the Arizona Corporation
Commission.



Please contact me at (520) 917-8745 if you have any questions.


Liza Castillo, Right of Way Agent
Land Management
Tucson Electric Power Co.
Unisource Energy Gas & Unisource Energy Electric
PH: (520) 917-8745
lcastillo@tep.com <mailto:lcastillo@tep.com>
03/13/2007 ED ABRIGO PIMA COUNTY ASSESSOR Approved Office of the Pima County Assessor


115 N. Church Ave.


Tucson, Arizona 85701



BILL STAPLES

ASSESSOR










TO: CDRC Office

Subdivision Review

City of Tucson (FAX# 791-5559)



FROM: Gary Ault, Mapping Supervisor

Pima County Assessor's Office

Mapping Department



DATE: March 13, 2007





RE: Assessor's Review and Comments Regarding Final Plat

S07-022 LA PLACITA OFFICE CONDOMINIUMS T141313





* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *



X Plat meets Assessor's Office requirements.

_______ Plat does not meet Assessor's Office requirements.





COMMENTS:



THANK YOU FOR YOUR SUBMITTAL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS PLEASE CALL
ROSANNA WERNER AT 740-4390



NOTE: THE ASSESSOR'S CURRENT INVOLVEMENT IN PROCESSING ITS MANUAL MAPS
TO DIGITAL FORMAT IS EXPEDITED GREATLY BY EXCHANGE OF DIGITAL DATA. IN
THE COURSE OF RECORDING THIS SUBDIVISION YOUR ASSISTANCE IN PROVIDING
THIS OFFICE WITH AN AUTOCAD COPY WOULD BE GREATLY APPRECIATED. THANK
YOU FOR ANY DIGITAL DATA PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED.













ROSANNA WERNER
03/13/2007 PGEHLEN1 TUCSON WATER NEW AREA DEVELOPMENT REVIEW Passed
03/13/2007 KAY MARKS PIMA COUNTY ADDRESSING Denied 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL
TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207

KAY MARKS
ADDRESSING OFFICIAL
PH: 740-6480
FAX #: 740-6370


TO: CITY PLANNING
FROM: KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL
SUBJECT: S07-022 LA PLACITA OFFICE CONDOMINIUMS/FINAL PLAT
DATE: March 12, 2007



The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and the following matters must be resolved prior to our approval:



The Location Map must be located on pg. 1.

Include all legal description information on all Title Blocks.

Spell out all street suffixes except on Location Plan.

Include north arrows on pgs. 9.

Include Building 5 on pg. 17.




jg
03/14/2007 KAROL ARAGONEZ ZONING REVIEW Denied CDRC TRANSMITTAL

TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office

FROM: Karol Aragonez
Planner

PROJECT: S07 022
La Placita Office Condominiums
Final Plat

TRANSMITTAL DATE: March 13, 2007

DUE DATE: March 12, 2007

COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed.

1. An applicant has one (1) year from the date of application to obtain approval and recordation of a final condominium plat that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application. This final condominium plat must be approved and recorded on or before February 9, 2008.

2. Case number S07-022 has been assigned to this final plat. Please place this number in the right corner of all sheets of the final plat.
DS 2-03.6.1.K

3. Please provide a small project location map in the upper right corner of the first sheet of the plat at a scale of 3"=I mile. The location map shall show the subject property approximately centered within one (1) square mile area. Conditions such as subdivisions (referenced by recorded book and page), major streets, and railroads are to be shown. Provide the section, township, and range; section corners; north arrow; and scale.
DS 2-03.6.1.D

4. The property may be subject to conditions of rezoning case C9-69-55, ordinance number 3693. Please verify if there exists applicable conditions of rezoning for this site. If so add a note stating "This plat is subject to the conditions of rezoning case number C9-65-55, unless superseded by a subsequent rezoning ordinance". If conditions apply please provide a separate letter detailing compliance to the rezoning conditions.
DS 2-03.6.2.D

5. This site may be subject to the Pueblo Center Redevelopment Project, Urban Renewal Plan adopted by Mayor and Council, November 8, 1965. This document provides design criteria such as permitted uses, maximum densities, lot coverage, FAR, maximum building height, minimum open space, off street parking requirements, and off-street loading requirements. At this time staff is determining whether this document is part of rezoning conditions and/or a development agreement. The City Attorney's Office has been advised of the Plan and will be providing a determination as to its applicability and administration.

6. Please add the following note to the final plat. "Any relocation, modification, etc., of existing utilities and/or public improvements necessitated by the proposed development will be at no expense to the public".
DS 2-03.6.2.I

7. Please provide the width of Broadway Boulevard and Church Avenue, the pedestrian easement adjacent to Block 510, Lot 1, and the underground electric easements. Please label both streets as public.
DS 2-03.6.4.A

8. Please provide dimensioned elevations of units.

Please identify the location of required motor vehicle parking and off-street loading.

9. Please submit a copy of a report on the physical condition of all buildings, structures, and other improvements to the property to be subdivided prior to approval of a final plat by the Mayor and Council. The subdivider shall provide this report to all prospective purchasers of units prior to execution of a binding contract of purchase. The report shall contain the following.
a. A statement of the estimated fees or assessments, if any, that the purchaser of a unit will pay, on a monthly and yearly basis, for at least a two (2) year period following purchase.
b. A report from a licensed pest control operator on each building or structure and each unit within the building or structure.
c. A statement of the unit's average monthly utility costs based on the preceding twelve (12) month period, where the subdivider has access to such utility cost data.
d. A report describing, to the best knowledge or estimate of the subdivider, the physical condition of elements of the structure, equipment, or appliances in a unit, the repair or replacement of which will be the responsibility of the purchaser. The report shall state the approximate date on which the element, equipment, or appliance was originally constructed or installed; the approximate date on which it was subsequently replaced or will likely require replacement; and the current estimated cost of replacement. This report shall not be construed to create any warranties, express or implied.
e. A report containing information to be obtained from the City Fire Department describing the extent to which the buildings and structures to be converted by the plat submitted by the subdivider deviate from applicable requirements of the Building Code, Tucson Code, Chapter 6, and the Fire Prevention Code, Tucson Code, Chapter 13, in the following specified areas of fire safety.
1. Accessibility of buildings and structures to fire-fighting equipment; and
2. Proximity and frequency of fire hydrants.
LUC 4.1.9.2


If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Karol Aragonez, (520) 791-5550, ext. 1197.

KAA S:\zoning review\karol\planning\cdrc\finalplat\S07-022fp.doc

RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised final plat, CC&R's and additional requested documents.
03/23/2007 FRODRIG2 PIMA COUNTY WASTEWATER Denied March 22, 2007

To: Wayne Ashby,
Ashby Surveying & drafting

Thru: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Manager
City of Tucson Development Services Department

From: Chandubhai C. Patel, P.E., Civil Engg. Manager
Development Review Division (Wastewater)
Pima County Development Services Department

Subject: La Placita Office Condominiums
Units 1-71 and Common Elements "A"
And Limited Common Elements
Final Plat – 1st Submittal, S07-022

The proposed final plat for the above-referenced project has been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use.

ALL SHEETS. Add the project number, SO7-022, to the title block of each sheet. This number should be shown larger or bolder than any other cross reference numbers.

SHEET 1. Add a General Note that states:

THIS IS AN OFFICE CONDOMINIUM CONVERSION PROJECT. THE ONSITE SEWERS, EXCEPT THE PUBLIC SEWERS WITHIN THE PUBLIC SEWER EASEMENTS, ARE EXISTING AND PRIVATE. NO NEW SEWERS ARE PROPOSED.

SHEET 1. In the DEDICATION block, 3rd paragraph, 3rd line, add PIMA COUNTY after the word UNDERGROUND.

4. SHEET 1. In the DEDICATION block, 3rd paragraph, 4th line, add AND SEWER LINES after the word UTILITIES.

The next submittal of this project will be the 2ND submittal. A check for the review fee of this submittal in the amount of $50.00 made out to PIMA COUNTY TREASURER must accompany the revised set of bluelines and the response letter.




If you have any questions regarding the above comments, please do not hesitate to contact me.

Sincerely,






Chandubhai C. Patel, P.E.
Phone: 520-740-6563

Copy: Project File
03/24/2007 PATRICIA GILBERT ENGINEERING REVIEW Denied TO: Patricia Gehlen; CDRC Coordinator DATE: March 21, 2007

SUBJECT: Engineering review of the Final Plat. The activity number is S07-022.

SUMMARY: The Final Plat and CC&Rs were received by Engineering on February 9th,2007. Engineering has reviewed the received items and does not recommend approval of the Final Plat or the CC&Rs.

RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: FINAL PLAT, CC&Rs

SUBMITTAL REQUIRED: BOUNDARY CLOSURE CALCS, CURRENT TITLE REPORT (within 90 days)

The next submittal must address the following items:

FINAL PLAT COMMENTS

1. On sheet one of the final plat provide a location map that meets the criteria found in DS 2-03.6.1.D.

2. Provide the subdivision case number, S07-022, in the lower right hand corner of each sheet. DS 2-03.6.1K.

3. Remove all the line weight representing floor plan information. This office acknowledges the intent is to clarify, however this is a survey document and site/building plan information should not be provided on the plat.

4. In addition to the above comment, in regards to common element "A" remove the floor/site plan information and the labeling for mechanical equipment, lower court, transformer vault, electrical equipment, etc. The common element only requires, bearings, dimensions and ties. Revise appropriately.

5. When referencing the limited common element only provide bearings, dimensions and square footage. Remove from the plat view any descriptions of the limited common element, i.e balcony, restrooms, deck, etc.

6. Add the following note, "Any relocation, modification, etc., of existing utilities and/or public improvement necessitated by the proposed development will be at no expense to the public."

7. For clarity provide on sheet 1 adjacent to the list of sheets; provide a list indicating the square footage of common element "A" and the limited common elements with reference to the floor the common element resides on for each sheet.

8. Revise the Final Plat Standard paragraphs on the first sheet so that they are listed in the following order for better understanding and clarity DS Sec.2-03.6.3:

1. Dedication Paragraph
2. Beneficiary Block Paragraph (if applicable)
3. Acknowledgement Paragraph
4. Approval Paragraph
5. Recordation Data Block Paragraph
6. Assurance Block
7. Certification of Survey

9. Revise the second signature line to read, "City of Tucson Engineering Administrator," rather than, "City of Tucson Engineer." DS 2-03.6.3.

10. Indicate on the plat if the shown existing easements are public or private.

11. Item 5 and 6 on the title report states the easement is a "gas and electric easement." Where the plat only shows the easement to be an electric easement. The description of the easements in the title block should match the description of the easement provided on the plat. Revise the document(s) to match.

12. There are several easements listed in the title report that are not shown on the plat. The easements shown in the title report must match what is provided on the plat. The following list is the easements found in the title report but not provided on the plat. Revise the documents to match.

Docket 3947 Page 635
Docket 4444 Page 354
Docket 4616 Page 165
Docket 5276 Page 691
Docket 37 Page 44

13. Describe in the response letter the easement agreement, Docket 5276 Page 691. If it is general easement provide the description in a general note. If the easement pertains to something specific, graphically show the easement on the plat.

14. Provide the docket and page for the overhead easement shown on sheet 3 or remove as the overhead easement is not part of the parcel.

15. There are four easements shown on the plat that are not described in the title report. The easements provided on the plat must be the same easements described in the title report. Clarify in the response letter and revise the plat appropriately. The following is a list of easements found on the plat but not described in the title report.

8' pedestrian/emergency easement Docket 4327 Page 544
15' pedestrian access easement Docket 4327 Page 544
pedestrian access easement Docket 20 Page 83
Non-buildable area Docket 4327 Page 544

16. Clarify in the response letter the area on sheet 5 labeled, "Unexcavated," and revise or remove from the plat.

17. On sheet 4, at the southeast corner of building 10 revise the overlay to not show the dimensions overlapping.

18. On sheet 4, at the west side of building 10, provide the missing dimensions for the limited common element.

19. On sheet 4, darken the line weight for building 2 and 4 on the west side of the structure. It is difficult to determine the building footprint.

20. Remove the verbiage from sheet 4, "Area of future development."

21. Remove on sheet 4 the line weight for the excluded parcel and the line weight or clarify why this information is provided when it is not part of the plat.

22. Remove the verbiage "BLDG 9 Excluded," from sheet 6, 7 and 9.

23. Provide the scale for all sheets indicating the volume; sheets 10 - 21.

24. On sheet 7, building 8, provide the dimensions for the lines that divide the building into three suites.

25. Provide dimensions for building 8, on sheet 8, for the line between the 18.8' and 41' dimensions, adjacent to the common element and for the lines between 8.3' and 16'.

26. On sheet 8, building 2, provide the curve data and dimensions for the lines between the 14.9' and 45.7' dimensions.

27. On sheet 4, building 4, provide dimensions between 24.5' and 59.7' dimensions.

28. Sheet 7, on the east side of building 3, common element A is missing lines and dimensions. Clarify and/or provide lines and dimensions for common element A.

29. On sheet 16 provide dimensions for Unit 50, Suite 5230 or clarify in the response letter why dimensions are not provided.

30. On sheet 18 of 21 provide dimensions for Unit 68, Suite 6429 or clarify in the response letter why dimensions are not provided.

31. For consistency provide the same font size for the title block on sheets 18 - 20, found on sheets 1 - 17 and 21.

32. On sheet 20 provide dimensions and solid lines to delineate the boundary of suite 6320 or clarify why the dimensions and lines are not provided.

33. On sheet 21 provide all the dimensions for both limited common elements for unit 40.

34. Provide the width for Broadway Boulevard and Church Avenue, label public or private. DS 2-03.6.4.A.

35. Corner tie information is to be provided on the plat. At least one corner of the subdivision must be tied by course and distance to a section corner or a quarter section corner. The plat must include a description of that corner marker and an indication of how the bearings were determined. Provide the corner tie recordation information on the plat. DS 2-03.6.5.A.

36. The structures must be tied to the boundary of the site. Building 3 is not tied to another building or the boundary of the site. Revise the plat to show a tie for building three. DS 2-03.6.5.

37. If applicable show no-vehicular access easements. DS 2-03.6.1.6.4.H.

38. Depending on how each comment has been addressed, additional comments could be forthcoming.
04/02/2007 PATRICIA GEHLEN ZONING-DECISION LETTER REVIEW Denied COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES

April 2, 2007

T. Wayne Ashby
Ashby Surveying & Drafting, Inc.
717 North Swan Road
Tucson, Arizona 85711

Subject: S07-022 La Placita Office Condominiums Final Plat

Dear Wayne:

Your submittal of February 9, 2007 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a DETAILED cover letter explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed:

ALL BLACKLINES MUST BE FOLDED

7 Copies Revised Final Plat (Building-Commercial, Addressing, Zoning, Wastewater, Engineering, Real Estate, DSD)

2 Copies Boundary Closure Calculations (Engineering, DSD)

2 Copies LUC Affidavit (Zoning, DSD)

3 Copies CC&R's (Zoning, Engineering, DSD)

2 Copies Current Title Report (Engineering, DSD)


Should you have any questions, please call me at 791-5608 extension 1179.

Sincerely,


Patricia Gehlen
CDRC Manager

All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/

Via fax: 325-2074
04/02/2007 FRODRIG2 COT NON-DSD REAL ESTATE Denied -Wording for the easements need to be changed to reflect changes.
-The Pedestrian Esmt. & UGE Esmt. are marked with the same "hatching".
-Under "Legend";
--annotation "A" needs to read "Portions of P.A.E. easements, Dkt. 6407 Pg. 1309, abandoned by this Plat" or words to this effect.
--Request clarification of annotation "A" placed at the S. boundary.