Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Plan Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - MINOR SUBD REVIEW
Plan Number - S06-272
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - MINOR SUBD REVIEW
Review Status: Completed
Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
05/01/2008 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
05/08/2008 | PETER MCLAUGHLIN | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Per LUC 3.8.4.4 the preparation of all elements of the Native Plant Preservation Plan and on-site monitoring as required under Sec. 3.8.6.7.D shall be performed by a plant professional, such as: A. An arborist certified by the International Society of Arboriculture. B. A landscape architect. C. A horticulturist, biologist, or botanist with a minimum B.A. or B.S. in an appropriate arid environment natural resource field. Provide the name and stamp/credentials of the preparer of the native plant preservation plan on the plan sheet. 2. The minimum text size for microfilming purposes is 12 point (0.12"). Revise the plant labels on the aerial phohotograph and in the legend to meet this requirement. 3. Some of the trees located within the easement (common area "A") do not have labels on the plan aerial. The only one within the easement is a triangle symbol which is too small to be easily identified. Clarify or revise as necessary to show all native trees within the easement. 4. For clarity, in the mitigation table, provide the total number of each plant which will be on the site. |
05/30/2008 | CDRC1 | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Denied | May 30, 2008 To: Paul Nzomo, P.E. Coronado Engineering & Development, Inc. Thru: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Manager City of Tucson Development Services Department From: Tom Porter , Sr. CEA Pima County Development Services Department Development Review Division (Wastewater) Subject: Elvira Subdivision, Lots 1-6 Final Plat - 5th Submittal, S06-272 The drawing for the proposed final plat for the above-referenced project has been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use. 1. Sheet 1 and 2(Grading Plan): The slope/length/size and material of pipe should be shown on all proposed sewer line segments including the HCS. The values shown do not correspond with the manhole inverts and lengths between cleanouts. 3rd request. This sheet has not been submitted so we can not review. This office will require a revised set of bluelines, and a response letter, addressing these comments. Additional comments may be made during the review of these documents. Pima County Code Title 13.20.030.A.2 requires that a wastewater review fee be paid for each submittal of the final plat. The fee for the first submittal is $166 plus $50 per sheet. For the second submittal, the review fee is $50 per sheet. For all subsequent submittals, the review fee is $39 per sheet. The next submittal of this project will be the sixth(6th) submittal. A check for the review fee of this submittal in the amount of $38.00 (made out to PIMA COUNTY TREASURER) must accompany the revised set of bluelines and response letter. If the number of sheets changes, please adjust the review fee accordingly. If you have any questions regarding the above comments, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, Tom Porter, Sr. CEA Phone: 520-740-6579 |
06/02/2008 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES June 2, 2008 Paul Nzomo Coronado Engineering & Development 1630 South Research Loop Suite 150 Tucson, Arizona 85710 Subject: S06-272 Elvira Subdivision Minor Subdivision Dear Paul: Your submittal of May 1, 2008 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a DETAILED cover letter explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLACKLINES MUST BE FOLDED 3 Copies Revised Final Plat (Wastewater, Landscape, DSD) 2 Copies Conceptual Grading Plans (Wastewater, DSD) 2 Copies NPPO & all other documents requested by Landscape (Landscape, DSD) Should you have any questions, please call me at 837-4919. Sincerely, Patricia Gehlen CDRC Manager All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: 722-5394 |
06/02/2008 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-RECORDATION | REVIEW | Needs Review |