Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Plan Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Plan Number - S06-270
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 04/13/2007 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 04/25/2007 | KAROL ARAGONEZ | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Karol Aragonez Planner PROJECT: S06-270 Littletown/Wilmot Industrial Tentative Plat Resubmittal TRANSMITTAL DATE: April 19, 2007 DUE DATE: May 11, 2007 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. Sidewalks are required as part of new development of all properties. All new subdivisions and applications for building permits shall provide five (5) foot wide sidewalks along the entire length of street frontage, whether public or private, of the property in question. Based on the proposed ADT the street cross section is to be designed as provided in 3-01.10 Figure 5. Please provide revise details for 1/5 and 2/5 on sheet 5 of 5. DS 3-01.3.3.A & DS 3-01.10 Figure 5 2. Please revise Detail 5/5. Wilmot Road requires a MS&R right-of-way cross section which includes improvements to the west half of the roadway. These include twelve (12) foot pedestrian/utility area which includes a six (6) foot sidewalk, seventeen (17) foot bus/carpool lane, three (3) - twelve (12) foot travel lanes, and ten (10) half median. Street improvements are required on streets abutting properties subject to subdivision platting, providing sidewalks, curbing and pavement as determined by Engineering. If other arrangements for street improvements have been made or are determined as not required, please provide documentation that specifies as such from COT Engineering. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Karol Aragonez, (520) 791-5550, ext. 74960. KAA S:\zoning review\karol\planning\cdrc\tentativeplat\S06-270tpr.doc RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised tentative plat and additional requested documents. |
| 05/01/2007 | JOSE ORTIZ | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Approv-Cond | Provide/callout a typical section for Calle Yrun Drive. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-4259 x76730 or Jose.Ortiz@tucsonaz.gov |
| 05/02/2007 | FRODRIG2 | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Approv-Cond | May 01, 2007 TO: Jerry Zillman The WLB Group THRU: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Manager City of Tucson, Development Services Department FROM: Chandubhai C. Patel, P.E., Civil Eng. Manager Development Review Division (Wastewater) Pima County Development Services Department SUBJECT: Littletown and Wilmot Industrial Park Tentative Plat – 2nd Submittal S06-270 The proposed sewer collection lines to serve the above-referenced project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use. Sheet No. 3. The 4” Force Main (FM) coming from Sheet #2 has the incorrect legend symbol. This can be corrected on the Mylars. Subject to the above, the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality and the Wastewater Management Department hereby conditionally approve the above referenced submittal of the tentative plat. The required revision(s) may be shown on the Mylars. Please note the following: Approval of the above referenced submittal does not authorize the construction of public or private sewer collection lines, or water distribution lines. Prior to the construction of such features, a Construction Authorization (Approval to Construct) may need to be obtained from the Pima County Environmental Quality Department. Also, air quality activity permits must be secured by the developer or prime contractor from Pima County Department of Environmental Quality before constructing, operating, or engaging in any activity which may cause or contribute to air pollution. If you have any questions regarding the above mentioned comments, please contact me. Sincerely, Chandubhai C. Patel, P.E. Telephone: (520) 740-6563 Copy: Project file |
| 05/07/2007 | FRODRIG2 | OTHER AGENCIES | PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS | Approved | CASE: S06-270, LITTLETOWN/WILMOT INDUSTRIAL COMMENT: NO OBJECTIONS OR ADVERSE COMMENTS Please call if you have questions or need additional information. Tom Cooney, Travel Forecasting Manager Pima Association of Governments 177 N. Church Ave, #405 Tucson, AZ 85701 Tel: (520) 792-1093, Fax: (520) 620-6981 Web: www.PAGnet.org and www.RTAmobility.com |
| 05/07/2007 | JIM EGAN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | |
| 05/07/2007 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1) Portions of the site may be subject to DS 2-13. The regulated Area is the area within the one hundred (100) year floodplain for watercourses with flows of one hundred (100) cfs that contain Protected Riparian Area (PRA). DS 2-03.2.2.B.7 Revise the tentative plat to identify the one hundred (100) year floodplain for watercourses with flows of one hundred (100) cfs. 2) If the property has regulated areas, an Environmental Resource Report (ERR) per DS 2-13 is required with any resubmittal of the plans to document the protected Riparian Area. The "regulated area" is the area(s) within the 100 year floodplain where riparian is equivalent to the various City or County classifications. If the applicant believes there is no riparian habitat, provide evidence in the form of a plant inventory per DS 2-13.2.5.B.1.r . 3) If Protected Riparian Areas exist on the site, the final plat must show these areas in a surveyable manner. PRA is required to be protected per DS 2-13.2.6 to insure continued preservation of the area. Revise if necessary to comply. 4) Basin A is required to be designed in conformance with the LUC Requirements for 50% vegetative groundcover for "street landscape borders" along Littletown Road, or be located behind a qualifying street landscape border. Revise as necessary. LUC 3.7.2.4 |
| 05/08/2007 | FRODRIG2 | COT NON-DSD | REAL ESTATE | Denied | S06-270 Littletown/Wilmot Industrial: Resubmittal - CDRC - Tentative Plat Review - Concerning "Temporary Turnaround Easement", Sht. 2 of 5, request a method be provided to remove the temporary easement when it is no longer required. Also, the "Temporary Turnaround Easement" is within C.A. "A". |
| 05/15/2007 | KAY MARKS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Denied | 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 KAY MARKS ADDRESSING OFFICIAL PH: 740-6480 FAX #: 740-6370 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL SUBJECT: S06-270 LITTLETOWN/WILMOT INDUSTRIAL/REVISED TENTATIVE PLAT DATE: 5/11/07 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and the following matters must be resolved prior to our approval: The Location Map scale should be 3”= 1 mile. This Location Map is not. Please correct per letter dated 1/23/07. Complete all street names on Project Layout (Southwestern portion) per letter dated 1/23/07. Calle Yrun Drive and Place cannot be used. If the name is Spanish it will require Spanish approval with the prefixes of Camino, Paseo or Via. If the name is not Spanish the suffixes of Drive, Lane, Road, Trail or Way can be used. Also, Yrun sounds like another street name. Two street names will be needed. Please submit a list of names to check for duplication. Change See Sheet 3 to 4 (northern most) on pg. 2. es |
| 06/04/2007 | ELIZABETH EBERBACH | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | TO: Patricia Gehlen; CDRC Coordinator SUBJECT: Littletown and Wilmot Industrial Park Tentative Plat Engineering Resubmittal Review REVIEWER: Elizabeth Eberbach LOCATION: T15S R14E Section 13, Ward 5, East Impact Fee area, FIRM panel 2265K ACTIVITY NUMBER: S06-270 SUMMARY: The revised Tentative Plat sheets, revised Drainage Report, geotechnical investigation report, landscape documents, title report and response letter were received by Engineering for review. The Drainage Report was reviewed for Tentative Plat purposes only. Engineering does not recommend approval of the Tentative Plat at this time. Address the following comments. DRAINAGE COMMENTS: 1) Tucson Code Chapter 26 Article I Division 1 Section 26-5.2(4): It does not appear that the NPPO was provided for the entire project only the roadways; besides other vegetation for landscape review, riparian habitat must be shown within the floodplain limits. (The following comment was provided in first review) Per floodplain and erosion hazard area regulations, 100-year regulatory floodplain riparian areas shall not be unnecessarily altered. Necessary alteration includes necessary all weather access to a site where there are no other access, or necessary utility crossing disturbance where there are no other locations for the utilities, or other necessary development where there are no other alternatives. Additional building area or parking would not be considered necessary. Clearly delineate the overlapping area of the 100-year regulatory floodplain limits and the limits of riparian area on Tentative Plat. In particular assure that lot 1, 2, and 19 are designed to provide sufficient industrial disturbance area outside of the set aside areas for the riparian floodplain. Provide an Environmental Resource Report (ERR) for these floodplain areas at the site. 2) DS Sec.10-01.2.2: Provide discussion in drainage report regarding basin drain down time. 3) DS Sec.2-03.2.3.J.3: Address the following comments for the exhibits in the Drainage Report: a) DS Sec.2-03.2.4.L.2: On exhibit 3 Post-developed Onsite Map, clarify labels for topo contours so that Minimum FFE's are based on highest WSEL at each of the proposed lots. Provide all proposed finished floor elevations for those lots that are adjacent to floodplain areas. b) Clarify floodplain flowrate exiting the project site near CP A3. 4) DS Sec. 2-03.2.4.L: Address the following Drainage report comments: a) Label any delineated undisturbed open spaces that reflect ERR compliance. b) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.H.3, 3-01.4.4.F: The calculated scupper lengths are substantially too small. Provide revised scupper calculations, or, assure with other calculations that, at minimum, the 10-year flows are conveyed under the sidewalk and show on planview that the 100-year is contained in the right-of-way. This must be addressed prior to resubmittal. c) Tucson Code Sec.26-5.2(5): If development is not proposed in the floodway fringe, show areas on each lot, that have floodplain limits, that shall not be developed with fill on planview of tentative plat. Development in floodway fringe area may not increase the base flood elevation more than 1/10th of a foot for any offsite property. Discuss results of analyses and impact and any raise due to future base flood elevation in the drainage report. d) Provide statement in drainage report regarding 404 compliance and state whether there are jurisdictional flows on the site. 5) Additional comments may be forthcoming for the basins once drainage comments are addressed. TENTATIVE PLAT COMMENTS: 6) DS Sec.2-03.2.3.A: For survey and boundary data, clarify the remaining comment: a) Clarify location of the offsite benchmark on a location map plan view. 7) Address the remaining easement comments: a) DS Sec.2-03.2.4.J: It is imperative that the MCI or other Fiber Optic cable line be clarified along south boundary. Provide a conceptual grading detail for the entrance area where the fiber optic cable is located to assure acceptable clearance is provided. Minimal/restricted cut or fill as directed by Utility company shall be complied with and shown on revised detail. 8) Address the following drainage related comments: a) DS Sec.2-03.2.4.L.2: Revise layout to pull buildable area of the lots out of the riparian jurisdictional floodplain and provide minimum FFE's / elevated areas for the building pads. List any minimum finished floor elevations for lots per drainage report. Revise general note 46 regarding Floodplain Use Permits may be required for the following lots ____ (list all affected lots). Some lots are missing from the list. 9) DS Sec.2-03.2.4.M: Provide a revised geotechnical report that includes geotechnical recommendations / revisions per the following comments: a) Provide recommendations for maximum slope grades. b) Percolation testing indicated a infiltration method used for sewage treatment facilities. Per City of Tucson policy, acceptable percolation testing shall utilize a ring method for determining infiltration rates to show compliance with minimum drain down time for associated upstream watershed area. Provide geotechnical infiltration test results using ring method. c) DS Sec.10-02.14.2.6: Provide 30-ft boring test results and discussion of hydro-collapsing soils potential in report. See last sentence of this section for items 6 (c) & (d) regarding hydro-collapsing soils and 30-foot test boring for basin design. Also, provide a minimum setback from basins to structures based on hydro-collapsing soil assessment. d) Revise street sections 1/5 and 2/5 on Tentative Plat to reflect minimum recommendations for pavement structural design. 10) Address the remaining street comments: a) DS Sec.2-03.2.4.M & DS Sec.3-05.5.3: Revise sight visibility triangle lengths on planview sheets to reflect data on sheet 5 for Collector/Arterial line of sight distances. 11) General Tentative Plat comments: a) Provide copy of annexation agreement with any conditions. b) Show bleed pipes for both basins on planviews with proposed invert elevations. c) On details 3 and 4 on sheet 5 address the following: i) Show property line and grading limit line. ii) Draw an existing grade line for both details. iii) Clarify erosion protection for fill slopes for basins to address unattenuated flow conditions. d) Provide copy of DSMR in resubmital. It will need to be clarified whether DSMR applies to frontage along Wilmot and Littletown Road. Otherwise show MS&R sidewalk along both frontage roads on cross sections and palnviews. LANDSCAPE PLAN COMMENT: 12) DS Sec.3-01.5.1: Address the following Landscape Plan comments: a) Show access ramps since basin side slopes are 2:1(H:V). b) On planview sheets with basins, assure that no proposed plants are blocking or placed on access ramps for the revised basins. The next submittal should address all the above items. Submit revised Tentative Plat, revised soils report, revised Drainage Report, revised Landscape documents, and response letter. Prior to resubmittal, schedule a meeting with me to go over your comments. If you have any questions, please call me at 791-5550 extension 2204. Elizabeth Eberbach, PE Civil Engineer Engineering Division Development Services |
| 06/05/2007 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES June 5, 2007 Jerry Zillman The WLB Group 4444 Broadway Blvd. Tucson, Arizona 85711 Subject: S06-270 Littletown/Wilmot Industrial Tentative Plat Dear Jerry: Your submittal of April 16, 2007 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a DETAILED cover letter explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLACKLINES MUST BE FOLDED 8 Copies Revised Tentative Plat (Zoning, Addressing, Real Estate, Landscape, Traffic, Wastewater, Engineering, DSD) 4 Copies Revised Landscape Plan (Zoning, Engineering, Landscape, DSD) 2 Copies Environmental Resource Report if required (Landscape, DSD) 2 Copies Drainage Report (Engineering, DSD) 2 Copies Soils Report (Engineering, DSD) Should you have any questions, please call me at 837-4919 Sincerely, Patricia Gehlen CDRC Manager All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: 881-7492 |