Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Plan Review Detail

Plan Number: S06-270
Parcel: Unknown

Address:
6702 S WILMOT RD

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW

Plan Number - S06-270
Review Name: TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
01/04/2007 FRODRIG2 OTHER AGENCIES PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS Denied S06-270 Littletown/ Wilmot Industrial Park


Transportation impact of this plan cannot be determined from the information supplied - gross floor area is required.
01/05/2007 KAROL ARAGONEZ ZONING REVIEW Denied CDRC TRANSMITTAL

TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office

FROM: Karol Aragonez
Planner

PROJECT: S06-270
Littletown/Wilmot Industrial
Tentative Plat

TRANSMITTAL DATE: January 4, 2007

DUE DATE: January 24, 2007

COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed.

1. Section 5.3.8.2, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a development plan. If, at the end of that time, the development plan has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this development plan is December 25, 2007.

2. In lieu of providing all proposed uses on the tentative plat the following note is to be added stating "Individual development plans, landscape, and NPPO plans will be submitted for review and approval for each lot as noted on this tentative plat. The individual development plans will include all regulatory requirements as mandated by the Land Use Code, and Development Standards for individual lot development. A copy of the approved tentative plat and landscape plan must be included as reference for each development plan submitted for review".

3. Case number S06-270 has been assigned to this development plan (DP). Please place this number and the annexation case number C15-95-16 in the right corner of all sheets of the development plan, landscape plan, NPPO, and any other associated sheets.
DS 2-03.2.2.B.1

4. Please add note stating "Total miles of new public streets are ____." "Total miles of new private streets are _____."
DS 2-03.2.2.D.1.b

5. Please provide bearings for the perimeter of the entire subdivision.
DS 2-03.2.3.B

6. Please draw all existing easements on the plan along with recordation information, location, width, and purpose. If an easement is no longer in use and scheduled to be vacated or has been abandoned, so indicate. If none exist provide response to reviewer's comments. Also if easements are purposed please draw, dimension and label as to their purpose and whether they will be public or private. If none exist provide response to reviewer's comments.
DS 2-03.2.3.C & DS 2-03.2.4.J

7. Per figure 2 of DS 3-01.10.0, five (5) foot wide sidewalks are required on both sides of the rights-of-way. Please revise details 1/5 and 2/5 to meet this requirement.

8. Please indicate on the DP if streets within the subdivision are public or private.
DS 2-03.2.4.F

9. Street improvements are required on streets abutting properties subject to subdivision platting, providing sidewalks, curbing and pavement as determined by Engineering. If other arrangements for street improvements have been made or are determined as not required, please provide documentation that specifies as such.

10. Please remove general note 31. This appears to be repeated from general note 1.

11. Please remove general note 33 that indicates the subdivision plat is not subject to the AEZ. Please replace with a note that states that "AEZ requirements for the Airport Hazard District and NCD-A & B shall be addressed at time of individual development plan submittal".

12. General note 19-21 indicates a homeowners association. This is to be changed to business owners or property owners association.

13. Please provide a copy of the CC&Rs to verify responsibility for maintenance and liability of the common areas.

14. All changes, modifications, and/or corrections must be made on all applicable plans including the development plan, landscape plan, and NPPO. Once changes, modifications, and/or corrections are made and reviewed further comments may result.

15. Please add the perimeter setback requirements as a note. Zero (0) abutting I-2, MS&R setback from Wilmot Road of the greater of twenty-one (21) feet or height measured from back of future curb, and developing area setback for Littletown Road based on the ADT.

If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Karol Aragonez, (520) 791-5550, ext. 1197.

KAA S:\zoning review\karol\planning\cdrc\tentativeplat\S06-270tp.doc

RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised tentative plat, CC&R's and additional requested documents.
01/08/2007 GLENN HICKS COT NON-DSD PARKS & RECREATION Approved DATE: January 8, 2007

TO: Ferne Rodriguez, Development Services

FROM: Glenn Hicks
Parks and Recreation
791-4873 ext. 215
Glenn.Hicks@tucsonaz.gov

CC:


SUBJECT: S06-270 Littletown/Wilmot Industrial: Tentative Plat Review


Staff has no comments.
01/09/2007 JCLARK3 ENV SVCS REVIEW Approv-Cond * No known landfill within 1000 feet of this development.
* Re4fuse service will have to be decided by each lot during the review of the specific lots development plan.
( A note need to be on the tentative plat so stating this condition.)
01/09/2007 JIM EGAN COT NON-DSD FIRE Denied Please add the following notes to the plan.

1. Additional fire hydrants shall be provided by the developer as required by the fire code in accordance with C.O.T. Standards. Spacing is greater than allowed. IFC Section 508 as amended.

Show outside radius of turn arounds to comply with Development Standards.
01/17/2007 LIZA CASTILLO UTILITIES TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER Approved 4350 E. Irvington Road, Tucson, AZ 85714
Post Office Box 711, Tucson, AZ 85702


WR#175476 January 16, 2007


Dear Mr. Jerry Zillman:

SUBJECT: Little Town & Wilmot Industrial Park
S06-270


Tucson Electric Power Company has reviewed and approved the development plan submitted January 4, 2007. It appears that there are some conflicts with the Overhead electric on Wilmot Road of this proposed development.

Enclosed is a copy of a TEP facilities map showing the approximate location of the existing facilities, highlighted facilities are proposed install on 100 scale map. Any relocation costs wll be billable to the customer.

In order to apply for electric service, call the New Construction Department at (520) 918-8300. Submit a final set of plans including approved site, offsite and electrical load plans. Include a CD with the AutoCAD version of the plans. If easements are required, they will be secured by separate instrument. Your final plans should be sent to:

Tucson Electric Power Company
Attn: Ms. Mary Boice
New Business Project Manager
P. O. Box 711 (DB-101)
Tucson, AZ 85702
520-917-8732

Please call the area Designer Todd Stocksdale at (520) 917-8715, should you have any questions.


Sincerely,


Henrietta Noriega
Office Specialist
Design/Build
hn
Enclosures
cc: P. Gehlen, City of Tucson (Email)
T. Stocksdale, TEP
01/22/2007 ED ABRIGO PIMA COUNTY ASSESSOR Approved Office of the Pima County Assessor


115 N. Church Ave.


Tucson, Arizona 85701



BILL STAPLES

ASSESSOR










TO: CDRC Office

Subdivision Review

City of Tucson (FAX# 791-5559)



FROM: Gary Ault, Mapping Supervisor

Pima County Assessor's Office

Mapping Department



DATE: January 22, 2007





RE: Assessor's Review and Comments Regarding Tentative Plat

S06-270 LITTLELTOWN/WILMOT INDUSTRIAL T151413





* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *



X Plat meets Assessor's Office requirements.

_______ Plat does not meet Assessor's Office requirements.





COMMENTS: PLEASE MAKE THE FOLLOWING ADJUSTMENTS BY FINAL PLAT STAGE:

1. REFERENCE THE ADJACENT AREAS AS EITHER "UNSUBDIVIDED" OR
NAME AND M&P OF ANY SUBS.

2. ADD BEARINGS FOR ALL LOT LINES.

3. ADD COMPLETE CURVE DATA FOR ALL CURVES.





THANK YOU FOR YOUR SUBMITTAL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS PLEASE CALL
ROSANNA WERNER AT 740-4390



NOTE: THE ASSESSOR'S CURRENT INVOLVEMENT IN PROCESSING ITS MANUAL MAPS
TO DIGITAL FORMAT IS EXPEDITED GREATLY BY EXCHANGE OF DIGITAL DATA. IN
THE COURSE OF RECORDING THIS SUBDIVISION YOUR ASSISTANCE IN PROVIDING
THIS OFFICE WITH AN AUTOCAD COPY WOULD BE GREATLY APPRECIATED. THANK
YOU FOR ANY DIGITAL DATA PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED.













ROSANNA WERNER
01/23/2007 KAY MARKS PIMA COUNTY ADDRESSING Denied 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL
TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207

KAY MARKS
ADDRESSING OFFICIAL
PH: 740-6480
FAX #: 740-6370


TO: CITY PLANNING
FROM: KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL
SUBJECT: S06-270 LITTLETOWN/WILMOT INDUSTRIAL/TENTATIVE PLAT
DATE: 1/23/07



The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and the following matters must be resolved prior to our approval:

Correct Location Map scale.

Change Section 8 to 18 on Location Map.

Complete all street names on Project Layout.

Do not shade in project on Project Layout.

Change the E ¼” corner to the NE ¼ corner. Also, take out the “on the other E ¼” on Project Layout.




es
01/24/2007 JOE LINVILLE LANDSCAPE REVIEW Denied 1) Portions of the site may be subject to DS 2-13. The regulated Area is the area within the one hundred (100) year floodplain for watercourses with flows of one hundred (100) cfs that contain Protected Riparian Area (PRA).
DS 2-03.2.2.B.7
Revise the tentative plat to identify the one hundred (100) year floodplain for watercourses with flows of one hundred (100) cfs.

2) If the property has regulated areas, an Environmental Resource Report (ERR) per DS 2-13 is required with any resubmittal of the plans.

3) If Protected Riparian Areas exist on the site, the final plat must show these areas in a surveyable manner. PRA is required to be protected per DS 2-13.2.6 to insure continued preservation of the area. Revise if necessary to comply.

4) Revise the landscape plan to include slope ratios for retention and detention basins. Basin slopes are required to have slopes no steeper than 4:1 where depths are three feet or greater, 3:1 for unprotected slopes and 2: 1 for protected slopes for depths less than three feet. DS 10-01.4

5) Revise the landscape plans to show the limits of grading. DS 2-07.2.2.B.5

6) Revise the landscape plans to show the limits of grading. DS 2-07.2.2.B.5

7) Revise the plat to include a common area or landscape easement for the Wilmot Road landscape border. LUC 4.1.8.4

8) Revise the native plant preservation plan to clarify the proposed phasing of construction. Clarify the extent of infrastructure improvements and add a general note regarding the additional native plant preservation plan requirements for individual lot development.

9) Landscape and irrigation proposed in right-of-way or MS&R areas must be approved by the City Engineer or designee and comply with the City Engineer's requirements on construction, irrigation, location, and plant type. Provide verification, in writing, of any approvals obtained. Contact Gary Wittwer, DOT Landscape Architect for specific requirements.

10) Add the following note to the landscape plan, revise the plans as necessary to comply with the standards:
A) All planting and irrigation that is proposed within the ROW must receive a permit prior to construction. Plans should be submitted to the City of Tucson Permits and Code section at 201 N. Stone, 4th floor. Once the permit has been approved, the applicant must call for a "Blue Stake " prior to the required pre-construction meeting with the City Landscape Architect, and prior to starting any work.

B) It is the property owner's responsibility to keep the Sight Visibility Triangles (SVT), and the pedestrian access area clear of vegetation at all times, per Land Use Code (LUC) section 3.7.2.9. Final plant locations must be in compliance with all utility setback requirements. The owner understands that if the City of Tucson Transportation Department or any utility company needs to work within the ROW in the landscaped area, plants and irrigation may be destroyed without replacement or repair. The property owner assumes full liability for this landscape and irrigation, and any damage to roadway, sidewalk and utilities.

C) The only private irrigation equipment that is allowed within the ROW is polyethylene type tubing and emitters that are not under constant pressure. All other equipment except for the water meter must be on Standard Notes for Planting in ROW

11) Revise note 20 and28 on the tentative plat. The do not appear to refer to the proposed subdivision.

12) Revise general note 13 on the landscape plan to correct the gross area of the site. Clarify on the native plant preservation the approximate are that the plan covers.

RESUBMITTAL OF ALL PLANS IS REQUIRED. An ERR
may be required, see comments 1 & 2.
01/24/2007 FRODRIG2 COT NON-DSD REAL ESTATE Denied S06-270 Littletown/Wilmot Industrial: Tentative Plat Review - Concerning Street "B", request clarification of access to Littletown Road which is not paved. Sht. 2 of 5 shows a temporary easement for a turn-around, "sight visibility triangles" and engineered right-of-way is annotated.
01/24/2007 JOSE ORTIZ COT NON-DSD TRAFFIC Denied January 24, 2007
ACTIVITY NUMBER: S06-270
PROJECT NAME: Littletown & Wilmot Industrial Park
PROJECT ADDRESS: 6702 S Wilmot Rd
PROJECT REVIEWER: Jose E. Ortiz PE, Traffic Engineer

Resubmittal Required: Traffic Engineering does not recommend approval of the Tentative Plat; therefore a revised Tentative Plat is required for re-submittal.

The following items must be revised or added to the plat.

1. Include a response letter with the next submittal that states how all comments have been addressed.

2. Better define the location of the 1' No Access Easement along the eastern property line of Lots 2 and 3.

3. Due to the TIA recommendations for a right turn and left turn lane on Street A at the intersection with Wilmot Road the 1' No Access Easement will need to be re-evaluated to prevent potential access restrictions to lots 2 and 3. A meeting maybe needed to discuss other options in regards to on-site access to lots 2 and 3 from Street A and/or Wilmot Road.

4. A private improvement agreement (PIA) will be necessary for the proposed work to be performed within the Right-of-way. An approved tentative plat is required prior to applying for a PIA. Contact the PIA Coordinator for additional PIA information at 791-5550 ext. 1107.


If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-4259 x76730 or Jose.Ortiz@tucsonaz.gov
01/25/2007 FRODRIG2 PIMA COUNTY WASTEWATER Denied January 24, 2007

TO: Jerry Zillman,
The WLB Group

THRU: Patricia Gehlen., CDRC Manager
City of Tucson, Development Services Department

FROM: Chandubhai C. Patel, P.E., Civil Engineering Manager
Pima County Development Services Department
Development Review Division (Wastewater)

SUBJECT: Littletown And Wilmot Industrial Park
Tentative Plat – 1st Submittal
S06-270


The proposed sewer collection lines to serve the above-referenced development have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ), and the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use.


ALL SHEETS. Add the project number, S06-270 to the title block of each sheet. This number should be shown larger or bolder than any cross-reference numbers.

Provide a letter from PCWMD Development Services Section, written within the past 90 days, stating that the treatment and conveyance system capacity for this project is available. A capacity request form may be found at http://www.pima.gov/wwm/forms/docs/CapResponseRequest.pdf

SHEET 1. Add a General Note that reads:

THIS PROJECT HAS --------- PROPOSED AND--------- EXISTING WASTEWATER FIXTURE UNIT EQUIVALENTS, PER TABLE 13.20.040(F)(1) in PIMA COUNTY CODE 13.20.040(F)

Also, fill in the blanks in the above note.

The PCWMD will not accept the proposed public sanitary sewerage facilities into the County’s public sewerage system( The WLB Group will receive a separate notification to this effect directly from the PCWMD). Please revise this tentative Plat to show the proposed sewerage system as private.

In light of the above , the proposed public streets should be revised to change from PUBLIC to PRIVATE.

Revise the General Note # 11 to state:

ON-SITE SANITARY SEWERS WILL BE PRIVATE AND WILL BE CONSTRUCTED, OPERATED AND MAINTAINED ON A PRIVATE BASIS. THE LOCATION AND METHOD OF CONNECTION TO AN EXISTING PUBLIC SANITARY SEWER IS SUBJECT TO REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE PCWMD AT THE TIME OF PLUMBING OR BUILDING PLANS.

Add the following General Note:

MAINTENANCE AND OPERATION OF THE PRIVATE SANITARY SEWER TO ITS PINT OF CONNECTION TO THE PUBLIC SEWER IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE PROPERTY OWNERS OR THEIR DULY FORMED OWNERS’ ASSOCIATION.

SHEET 1. General Note # 9: Change the word DESIGNATED to DESIGNED.

9. SHEET 1. In the Legend, change the call out for existing sewer to EXISTING PUBLIC SEWER.

10. SHEET 1. In the Legend, change the call out for the proposed sewer to PROPOSED PRIVATE SEWER.

11. SHEET 1. In the Legend,show a symbol for the proposed force Main..

12. SHEET 2, 3 & 4. Number the proposed sewer manholes in sequential order starting from the lowest point to the highest point of the sewer line.

13. SHEET 3. The design of the transition structure between the force main and the gravity sewer should follow the Detail WWM 505 as shown in the 2003 edition of the Standard Details for Public Improvements for the City of Tucson/ Pima County.

14. SHEET 3 & 4. You are proposing a 12-inch gravity sewer line at a slope of 0.16 %. This is not acceptable as the minimum theoretical slope for achieving a velocity of 2.0 ft/sec is 0.19 %. However, this minimum slope will not allow for any error during construction. We therefore prefer to provide a design slope of 0.22 % for 12 –inch sewers. Please revise your sewer design to provide this 0.22 % slope.

SHEET 3. Label the proposed sewer in Wilmot road as OFF-SITE SEWER.

16. SHEET 4. Call out the existing public sewer as EXISTING 12-INCH PVC PUBLIC SEWER, G-86-51


17. SHEET 1. Add a General Note that states:

A PROPERTY OWNERS’ ASSOCIATION WILL BE FORMED TO ACCEPT THE RESPONSIBILITY AND LIABILITY FOR CONSTRUCTION, MAINTENANCE, OPERATION AND CONTROL OF ALL PRIVATE SANITARY SEWERS.

18. We will require a revised set of drawings and a response letter addressing each comment. Additional comments may be made during the review of these documents.

The next submittal of this project will be the 2nd submittal. A check for the review fee of this submittal in the amount of $200.00 made out to PIMA COUNTY TREASURER must accompany the revised set of bluelines and the response letter.

For any questions regarding the fee schedule, please go to http://www.pimaxpress.com/SubDivision/Documents/Fees.PDF where you may find the appropriate wastewater review fees at the bottom of page 1. If the number of sheets changes, please adjust the review fee accordingly.


If you have any questions regarding the above comments, please do not hesitate to contact me.

Sincerely,




Chandubhai C. Patel, P.E.
Telephone: (520) 740-6563

Copy: Project file
01/26/2007 ROGER HOWLETT COT NON-DSD COMMUNITY PLANNING Approved DEPARTMENT OF URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN COMMENTS

Regarding

SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application

CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT

S06-270 Littletown/Wilmot Industrial 01/25/07

(XXXX) Tentative Plat
() Development Plan
(XXXX) Landscape Plan
() Revised Plan/Plat
() Board of Adjustment
(XXXX) Other - NPPO

CROSS REFERENCE: Annexation C15-95-16

NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: Rincon Southeast

GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE:

COMMENTS DUE BY: 01/24/07

SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:

() No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment
(XXXX) Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions
() RCP Proposal Complies with Plan Policies
() See Additional Comments Attached
() No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on:
() Resubmittal Required:
() Tentative Plat
() Development Plan
() Landscape Plan
() Other

REVIEWER: drcorral 791-4505 DATE: 01/24/07
01/26/2007 PGEHLEN1 TUCSON WATER NEW AREA DEVELOPMENT REVIEW Passed
02/01/2007 TOM MARTINEZ OTHER AGENCIES AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION Approved No comments from ADOT at this time.
02/27/2007 ELIZABETH EBERBACH ENGINEERING REVIEW Denied TO: Patricia Gehlen; CDRC Coordinator
SUBJECT: Littletown and Wilmot Industrial Park Tentative Plat Engineering Review
REVIEWER: Elizabeth Eberbach
LOCATION: T15S R14E Section 13, Ward 5, East Impact Fee area, FIRM panel 2265K
ACTIVITY NUMBER: S06-270

SUMMARY: The Tentative Plat sheets, Drainage Report, landscape documents, and title report were received by Engineering for review. The Drainage Report was reviewed for Tentative Plat purposes only. Engineering does not recommend approval of the Tentative Plat at this time. Address the following comments.

DRAINAGE COMMENTS:
1) Tucson Code Chapter 26 Article I Division 1 Section 26-5.2(4): Per floodplain and erosion hazard area regulations, 100-year regulatory floodplain riparian areas shall not be unnecessarily altered. Necessary alteration includes necessary all weather access to a site where there are no other access, or necessary utility crossing disturbance where there are no other locations for the utilities, or other necessary development where there are no other alternatives. Additional building area or parking would not be considered necessary. Clearly delineate the overlapping area of the 100-year regulatory floodplain limits and the limits of riparian area on Tentative Plat. In particular assure that lot 1, 2, and 19 are designed to provide sufficient industrial disturbance area outside of the set aside areas for the riparian floodplain. Provide an Environmental Resource Report (ERR) for these floodplain areas at the site.
2) DS Sec.10-01.2.2: Soil type "C" is indicated for the majority of this site, per TDOT map guide and as stated in the submitted drainage report. Unless geotechnical report shows that percolation is available, the project may want to consider proposal to waive retention per section 2.2 of the Det/Ret Manual. If there are subsurface conditions that constrain the project from providing retention, substantiate in a geotechnical report and the City will consider waiving the retention requirement. There may be additional detention requirement depending on geotechnical and drainage report response per this section of the manual. Update paragraph A on page 13 to discuss retention.
3) DS Sec.3.5.1, 10-01.III.5.1.7: Revise basin locations; no on-line detention facilities will be accepted since portions of the upstream wash are natural. No "on-line" detention facilities are permitted if any portion of a wash is in a natural state upstream of the proposed basin, or if the upstream watershed is greater than 100 acres. The proposed on-line basins do not conform to these standards and need to be revised.
4) DS Sec.2-03.2.3.J.3: Address the following comments for the exhibits in the Drainage Report:
a) On exhibit 2 Pre-dev. Onsite Map address the following:
i) Clarify water surface contours for post-developed conditions on exhibit planview to match the data in table on this exhibit.
ii) DS Sec.2-03.2.4.L.2: Provide any proposed finished floor elevations for those lots that are adjacent to floodplain areas. It may be necessary to revise layout to pull lots out of the riparian floodplain and provide revised FFE's / elevated areas for the building pads. Clarify.
iii) Clarify in drainage report and correct discrepancy on this exhibit for the flowrate indicated for concentration point 1C which should match Q for cross section 14.
b) On exhibit 1 Pre-dev Watershed Map, clarify watersheds 2A and 2B, to differentiate the jurisdictional flow from 2A.
5) DS Sec. 2-03.2.4.L: Address the following Drainage report comments:
a) Label the jurisdictional flowrates entering and existing the project site on all exhibits.
b) Label any delineated undisturbed open spaces.
c) DS Sec.10-02 page 8.06: Table 8.1: Revise worksheets for scuppers and roadway capacities to reflect a roadway Manning's coefficient of .020 for the maximum value for asphalt when cars are present, per this section of the standards. Revise Tentative Plat accordingly.
d) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.H.3, 3-01.4.4.F: The calculated scupper lengths are substantially too small. Provide revised scupper calculations, or, assure with other calculations that, at minimum, the 10-year flows are conveyed under the sidewalk and that the 100-year is contained in the right-of-way.
e) Tucson Code Sec.26-5.2(5): Development in floodway fringe area may not increase the base flood elevation more than 1/10th of a foot for any offsite property. Discuss results of analyses and impact and any raise due to future base flood elevation in the drainage report.
f) Revise page 10 paragraphs A and G to state that there are jurisdictional flows on the site.
6) Additional comments may be forthcoming for the basins once drainage comments are addressed.

TENTATIVE PLAT COMMENTS:
7) DS Sec.2-03.2.3.A: For survey and boundary data, clarify the following:
a) DS Sec.2-03.2.1.J: Clarify locations and make legible all survey monuments to be set and found;
b) Clarify location of local benchmark on a plan view and provide datum.
8) Address the following easement comments:
a) DS Sec.2-03.2.3.C: Explain all existing easements, including those in Title Report Schedule B items 5-9, and 11, in a response letter and/or drawn on the plat, with recordation information, locations, widths, and purposes included on plat view. If the easement is not in use and proposed for abandonment, so indicate. Blanket easements should be clearly noted with recordation data and proposed status.
b) DS Sec.2-03.2.4.J: It is imperative that the MCI or other Fiber Optic cable line be clarified along south boundary. Provide a conceptual grading detail for the entrance area where the fiber optic cable is located to assure acceptable clearance is provided. Minimal/restricted cut or fill as directed by Utility company shall be complied with and shown on detail.
c) DS Sec.2-03.2.4.J: All proposed easements (utility, sewer, drainage, access, etc.) are to be dimensioned and labeled as to their purposes and whether they will be public or private; show any private drainage maintenance easement areas.
9) Address the following drainage related comments:
a) Add general note to sheet 1 stating that development plans for each lot shall include a drainage report that addresses detention basin requirements for each lot.
b) Provide reference to scupper type standard used.
c) Label the jurisdictional flowrates entering and existing the project site on all planviews.
d) DS Sec.2-03.2.4.L.2: Revise layout to pull buildable area of the lots out of the riparian jurisdictional floodplain and provide minimum FFE's / elevated areas for the building pads. List any minimum finished floor elevations for lots per drainage report. Add note that Floodplain Use Permits may be required for the following lots ____ (list lots).
e) Tucson Code Sec.26-5.2(13): Add general note that states that no walls, any type of fences, or other permanent obstacles will be allowed within the floodplain.
10) DS Sec.2-03.2.4.M: Provide geotechnical report that includes soils analysis for site, recommendations for maximum slope grades, slope treatments / scour protection, and if needed, percolation testing discussion and data, hydro-collapsing soils statement or test results, basin setbacks, soil conditions at the site, and other geotechnical considerations.
11) Address the following street comments:
a) DS Sec.2-03.2.3.D: Provide section for existing public right-of-way for Wilmot Road including: right-of-way width, recordation data, type and dimensioned width of existing and proposed paving, curb, and sidewalk.
b) DS Sec.2-03.2.4.F: Revise detail 1 and 2 on sheet 5 to provide street configuration per City of Tucson standards; street design shall meet criteria shown on Figure 5, in DS Sec.3-01.10. Right-of-way: 56-ft, 5-ft min sidewalk width, no wedge curb.
c) Remove Hermans Road reference on detail 3 on sheet 5.
d) DS Sec.2-03.2.4.M & DS Sec.3-05.5.3: Sight visibility triangle data on sheet 5 shall be updated to reflect Collector/Arterial line of sight distances.
12) General Tentative Plat comments:
a) Provide copy of annexation agreement with any conditions.
b) Update general notes 39 and 41 with missing information.
c) Clarify whether this is or is not applicable - general note 33.
d) General note 23; please add mileage of private streets (whether zero or otherwise).
13) DS Sec.2-03.2.2.C.2.b: When a grading plan is submitted for onsite drainage improvements, utilities, and street work, a fully completed floodplain use permit application with the $50 permit processing fee will be required. Grading Plan review package will be accepted after the Tentative Plat design has been revised and is at an acceptable stage of review - at minimum, after the 2nd Tentative plat resubmittal.

LANDSCAPE PLAN COMMENT:
14) DS Sec.3-01.5.1: Address the following Landscape Plan comments:
a) Show the sight visibility triangle on planview sheets.
b) Provide notation on Landscape Plan for restriction of existing or proposed vegetation and structures within 30" to 72" in height within the sight visibility triangles.
c) On planview sheets with basins, assure that no proposed plants are blocking or placed on access ramps for the revised basins.

The next submittal should address all the above items. Submit revised Tentative Plat, soils report, revised Drainage Report, copy of Landscape Plan if revised, and response letter. Prior to resubmittal, you may schedule a meeting with me to go over your comments. If you have any questions, please call me at 791-5550 extension 2204.

Elizabeth Eberbach, PE
Civil Engineer
Engineering Division
Development Services
02/28/2007 PATRICIA GEHLEN ZONING-DECISION LETTER REVIEW Denied COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES

February 28, 2007

Jerry Zillman
The WLB Group
4444 Broadway Blvd.
Tucson, Arizona 85711

Subject: S06-270 Littletown/Wilmot Industrial Tentative Plat

Dear Jerry:

Your submittal of December 26, 2006 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a DETAILED cover letter explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed:

ALL BLACKLINES MUST BE FOLDED

10 Copies Revised Tentative Plat (PAG, Zoning, Fire, Addressing, Real Estate, Landscape, Traffic, Wastewater, Engineering, DSD)

4 Copies Revised Landscape Plan (Zoning, Engineering, Landscape, DSD)

2 Copies Revised NPPO Plan (Landscape, DSD)

2 Copies Environmental Resource Report if required (Landscape, DSD)

2 Copies Drainage Report (Engineering, DSD)

2 Copies Soils Report (Engineering, DSD)

Should you have any questions, please call me at 791-5608 extension 1179.

Sincerely,


Patricia Gehlen
CDRC Manager

All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/
Via fax: 881-7492
12/22/2006 FERNE RODRIGUEZ START PLANS SUBMITTED Completed