Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Plan Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Plan Number - S06-267
Review Name: TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01/04/2007 | FRODRIG2 | OTHER AGENCIES | PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS | Approved | Transportation Information for Rezoning, Subdivision, and Development Requests Delivered to: Date Delivered: Development Services - City of Tucson 1/3/2007 Case Number Project Name Average number of daily trips (ADT) forecasted as a result of the proposed development This information is provided for jurisdictional planning departments to assess the impact of the proposed residential or commercial development on surrounding traffic patterns and roads. If the forecasted daily traffic exceeds 500 average daily trips, a more detailed analysis is also provided. S06-267 96 Enclave at Sarnoff Pima Association of Governments Sandra C. Holland, Data Services 177 N. Church Ave., Suite 405, Tucson, Arizona 85701-1127 (520) 792-1093 FAX (520) 620-6981 |
| 01/04/2007 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | The Landscape Section does not recommend approval at this time. Revise all plans as necessary. Resubmittal of all plans is required. Provide written responses as to how all comments were addressed with the next resubmittal. 1) Refer to DS 2-07.2.2 and DS 2-06.5.4 for the specific content required in the following elements of the landscape plan: Maintenance Schedule, Grading Information, Construction Details. Revise landscape plan to include required content and specifications. Grading information on the landscape plan shall include contour lines, spot elevations, percent slope across the site and direction of slope of paved areas, existing grades on adjacent rights-of-way and adjacent sites, and the methods by which water harvesting/ storm runoff is used to benefit planting areas on the site. DS 2-07.0 2) Landscape borders, common areas, and adjacent right-of-way areas are required to comply with the dust control provisions of LUC 3.7.2.7. Revise plans as necessary. 3) Screens are to be located so that the landscaping is visible from the street per DS 2-06.3.7.B.2. Walls, fences, or other screening must be placed behind the landscape border. Revise all plans and details as necessary to show the locations, to indicate the height and materials to be used for any proposed screen walls. LUC 3.7.2.4.A.2.b 4) A separate plant inventory is required for work to be done in adjacent right-of-way. Contact Gary Wittwer, Landscape Architect at TDOT Engineering Division regarding compliance with NPPO in public right-of-way. Contact info: gary.wittwer@tucsonaz.gov 5) Provide a calculation of the percentage of vegetative coverage per DS 2-07.2.2.2.g. for the street landscape borders. 6) Revise the landscape plans to include the following standard notes for landscaping in the public right-of-way and revise the plans as necessary to comply: All planting and irrigation that is proposed within the ROW must receive a permit prior to construction. Plans should be submitted to the City of Tucson Permits and Code section at 201 N. Stone, 4th floor. Once the permit has been approved, the applicant must call for a "Blue Stake " prior to the required pre-construction meeting with the City Landscape Architect, and prior to starting any work. It is the property owner's responsibility to keep the Sight Visibility Triangles (SVT), and the pedestrian access area clear of vegetation at all times, per Land Use Code (LUC) section 3.7.2.9. Final plant locations must be in compliance with all utility setback requirements. The owner understands that if the City of Tucson Transportation Department or any utility company needs to work within the ROW in the landscaped area, plants and irrigation may be destroyed without replacement or repair. The property owner assumes full liability for this landscape and irrigation, and any damage to roadway, sidewalk and utilities within the public right-of-way. The only private irrigation equipment that is allowed within the ROW is polyethylene type tubing and emitters that are not under constant pressure. All other equipment except for the water meter must be on site. 7) Grading, hydrology, and landscape structural plans are to be integrated to make maximum use of site storm water runoff for supplemental on-site irrigation purposes. The landscape plan shall indicate use of all runoff, from individual catch basins around single trees to basins accepting flow from an entire vehicular use area or roof area. LUC 3.7.4.3.B Show the direction of drainage flows and the required water harvesting basins on the landscape plan. 8) Revise the landscape plan to include slope ratios for retention and detention basins. Basin slopes are required to have slopes no steeper than 4:1 where depths exceed three feet, 3:1 for unprotected slopes and 2:1 for protected slopes for depths less than three feet. DS 10-01.4 9) Revise sheet L1.1 to cite the City Code rather than Ch. 18.72 of the Pima County Zoning Code. 10) Revise the landscape pan to include the required mitigation planting for Cercidium microphyllum. According to the NPPP, 19 mitigation plants are required. DS 2-15.3.4.B.2 11) Correct the plant schedule on sheet L1.1 and the planting plan if necessary to reflect the number of TOS plants indicated on the NPPP. 12) Revise the landscape plan to show all TOS plants, only the barrel cactus could be located. DS 2-15.3.4.B |
| 01/05/2007 | TOM MARTINEZ | OTHER AGENCIES | AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION | Approved | NO COMMENT S06-267 ROGERS CIVIL ENGINEERING ENCLAVE AT SARNOFF -------------------------------------------------------- Confidentiality and Nondisclosure Notice: This email transmission and any attachments are intended for use by the person(s)/entity(ies) named above and may contain confidential/privileged information. Any unauthorized use, disclosure or distribution is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by email, and delete or destroy all copies plus attachments. |
| 01/09/2007 | JCLARK3 | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Approved | * No known landfill within 1000 feet of this development. ' Ten lot subdivision w/curbside frontage and a cul-de-sac turnaround. Approved for APC curbside service. APC's to be placed and removed from the collection area on the day of service. |
| 01/11/2007 | FRODRIG2 | COT NON-DSD | REAL ESTATE | Denied | S06-267 Enclave at Sarnoff: Tentative Plat Review - Request current title report. The title report provided has an effective date 6/25/06. Taxes are not current. Request final plat contain signature block to show consent from any beneficiary interest. |
| 01/19/2007 | KAY MARKS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Approv-Cond | 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 KAY MARKS ADDRESSING OFFICIAL PH: 740-6480 FAX #: 740-6370 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL SUBJECT: S06-267 ENCLAVE AT SARNOFF/TENTATIVE PLAT DATE: 1/19/07 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and we hereby approve this project. NOTE: ON FINAL PLAT: Change 12. Lincoln Crest to Lincoln Terrace on Location Plan. 2.) Label approved interior street name on Final Plat. ***The Pima County Addressing Section can use digital CAD drawing files when submitted with your final plat Mylar. These CAD files can be submitted through Pima County Addressing. The digital CAD drawing files expedite the addressing and permitting processes when we are able to insert this digital data into the County’s Geographic Information System. Your support is greatly appreciated.*** |
| 01/19/2007 | GLENN HICKS | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Approved | DATE: January 19, 2007 TO: Ferne Rodriguez, Development Services FROM: Glenn Hicks Parks and Recreation 791-4873 ext. 215 Glenn.Hicks@tucsonaz.gov CC: SUBJECT: S06-267 Enclave at Sarnoff: Tentative Plat (12/22/06) Staff has no comments. |
| 01/22/2007 | ED ABRIGO | PIMA COUNTY | ASSESSOR | Approved | Office of the Pima County Assessor 115 N. Church Ave. Tucson, Arizona 85701 BILL STAPLES ASSESSOR TO: CDRC Office Subdivision Review City of Tucson (FAX# 791-5559) FROM: Gary Ault, Mapping Supervisor Pima County Assessor's Office Mapping Department DATE: January 22, 2007 RE: Assessor's Review and Comments Regarding Tentative Plat S06-267 ENCLAVE AT SARNOFF T141528 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * X Plat meets Assessor's Office requirements. _______ Plat does not meet Assessor's Office requirements. COMMENTS: PLEASE MAKE THE FOLLOWING ADJUSTMENTS BY FINAL PLAT STAGE: 1. ADD MILES OF NEW STREET TO GENERAL NOTES. 2. SHOW TIE TO THE SECTION WITH IMS AND BEARINGS. THANK YOU FOR YOUR SUBMITTAL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS PLEASE CALL ROSANNA WERNER AT 740-4390 NOTE: THE ASSESSOR'S CURRENT INVOLVEMENT IN PROCESSING ITS MANUAL MAPS TO DIGITAL FORMAT IS EXPEDITED GREATLY BY EXCHANGE OF DIGITAL DATA. IN THE COURSE OF RECORDING THIS SUBDIVISION YOUR ASSISTANCE IN PROVIDING THIS OFFICE WITH AN AUTOCAD COPY WOULD BE GREATLY APPRECIATED. THANK YOU FOR ANY DIGITAL DATA PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED. ROSANNA WERNER |
| 01/22/2007 | ROGER HOWLETT | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Approv-Cond | DEPARTMENT OF URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT S06-267 Enclave at Sarnoff (XXXX) Tentative Plat () Development Plan () Landscape Plan () Revised Plan/Plat () Board of Adjustment () Other CROSS REFERENCE: C9-80-30 – R-1 to R-2 Denied on 11/17/80 NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: South Pantano GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: COMMENTS DUE BY: 01/23/06 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: () No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP (XXXX) Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions () RCP Proposal Complies With Plan Policies (XXXX) See Additional Comments Attached () No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: () Resubmittal Required: () Tentative Plat () Development Plan () Landscape Plan () Other REVIEWER: D.R. Corral 791-4505 DATE: January 12, 2007 Urban Planning and Design Comments S06-267 Enclave at Sarnoff The South Pantano Area Plan and the Design Guidelines Manual state that detention/retention basins should be designed as open space and with active or passive recreational amenities. To respond to this direction locate a pleasing landscape including shade trees to enhance the aesthetics of the “Common Area A, retention/detention basin” fronting on Sarnoff Drive. Additionally, please locate amenities determined from potential customer reviews, such as picnic tables, benches, barbecues, tot lot, etc. in and around the detention/retention areas. Providing these improvements will improve the quality of homeowner experience and create visual relief, as well as enhancing the overall aesthetic quality of the streetscape. |
| 01/22/2007 | JIM EGAN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Denied | Provide noparking signs as required by IFC Appendix D. Coordinate fire lane widths with engineering comments and Development Standards. |
| 01/23/2007 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: Enclave at Sarnoff S06-267 Tentative Plat (1st Review) TRANSMITTAL DATE: January 19, 2007 DUE DATE: January 23, 2007 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. Section 4.1.7.1 of the Land Use Code (LUC), permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a tentative plat. If, at the end of that time, the tentative plat has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this tentative plat is December 21, 2007. 2. D.S. 2-03.2.1.D Identify watercourses and Sarnoff Drive on the location map. 3. D.S. 2-03.2.2.B.1 This plat has been assigned subdivision case number S06-267. Note the subdivision case number in the lower right corner near the title block of each sheet on all plans. 4. D.S. 2-03.2.2.B.1 Remove the reference to rezoning case C9-80-30 and subdivision case S04-175 from the plan. The rezoning case was rejected and the subdivision case expired. 5. D.S. 2-03.2.2.B.5 List the proposed use as ""FAMILY DWELLING "G", SUBJECT TO: SEC. 3.5.7.1.E, .F, .G, AND .H. 6. D.S. 2-03.2.2.B.7 Provide a general note stating "THIS PLAT IS DESIGNED TO MEET THE OVERLAY ZONE CRITERIA: LUC SEC. 2.8.3, MAJOR STREETS AND ROUTES (MS&R) SETBACK ZONE. 7. The garage setback called out on the TYP. LOT detail is incorrect. Per LUC Sec. 3.2.6.5.B.2.a the minimum setback of 19' from the back of sidewalk to allow sufficient space for a motor vehicle to be parked in front of the carport or garage, measured as follows: 1. Eighteen (18) feet (the length of a standard parking space) must be provided in front of the carport of garage and measured so that the full eighteen (18) foot parking space is available for parking on-site. 2. The eighteen (18) foot parking space shall be no closer than one (1) foot from back of sidewalk of the street from which access is gained. Per LUC Table 3.2.6.I provide the required building setback of 21 feet or H (height of the proposed exterior building wall), which ever is greatest, measured from the outside edge of nearest travel lane. 8. There appears to be descripences in the lot sizes listed on the plan. Review and revise as necessary. Additional comments may be forth coming. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 791-5608 ext. 1180. C:\planning\cdrc\tentativeplat\S06-267tp.doc RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised tentative/development plan and additional requested documents. |
| 01/24/2007 | FRODRIG2 | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Approv-Cond | January 24, 2007 To: Lloyd Rogers, Rogers Civil Engineering Thru: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Project Manager City of Tucson Development Services Department ____________________________________ From: Michael J.Harrington (520-740-6579), representing the Pima County Departments of Wastewater Management and Environmental Quality Subject: Enclave at Sarnoff, Lots 1 thru 10 and Common Areas “A” & “B” Tentative Plat - 1st Submittal S06-267 The proposed sewer collection lines for the above-referenced project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use. This project will be tributary both the Ina Road Water Pollution Control Facility and the Roger Road Wastewater Treatment Facility via the Pantaño Interceptor. Per written guidance provided by the PCWMD Development Services Section, sufficient conveyance and treatment capacity exists in the downstream public sewerage system for this small project, and a formal capacity response letter from the PCWMD will not be required for this project. This project will qualify for the standard connection fee rate. All Sheets: Add the subdivision case number, S06-267, to the title block of each sheet. This number should be shown larger or bolder than any cross reference numbers. No wastewater review fees will be charged for sheets where this is the only required revision. Subject to the above, the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality and Wastewater Management Department hereby approve the above referenced submittal of the tentative plat. The required revision(s) may be shown on the Mylars. Please note the following: Approval of the above referenced submittal does not authorize the construction of public or private sewer collection lines, or water distribution lines. Prior to the construction of such features, a Construction Authorization (Approval To Construct) may need to be obtained from the Pima County Environmental Quality. Also, air quality activity permits must be secured by the developer or prime contractor from the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality before constructing, operating or engaging in an activity which may cause or contribute to air pollution. If you have any questions regarding the above mentioned comments, please contact me at the telephone number shown under my signature on the first page of this letter CC: Project File |
| 01/26/2007 | PGEHLEN1 | TUCSON WATER NEW AREA DEVELOPMENT | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 01/30/2007 | LIZA CASTILLO | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Approved | 4350 E. Irvington Road, Tucson, AZ 85714 Post Office Box 711, Tucson, AZ 85702 WR#134189 January 30, 2007 Rick Engineering Attn: Lloyd W. Rogers 1765 W. Klamath Dr. Tucson, AZ 85704 Dear Mr.Rogers: SUBJECT: Enclave @ Sarnoff Lots 1 thru 10 S06-267 Tucson Electric Power Company (TEP) has no objection to the preliminary plat submitted for review January 5, 2007. Possible feeds poles, Units 143 and 144 - Feeds are within Escalante Road Right of Way. There are no apparent electrical facilities. Enclosed is a copy of TEP's facility map showing the approximate location and unit number of the existing facilities. TEP will provide a preliminary electrical design on the Approved Tentative Plat within fifteen (15) working days upon receipt of the plat. Additional plans necessary for preparation of the design are: building plans including water, electrical, landscape, sidewalk and paving plans. Also, submit the AutoCAD version of the plat on a CD or email to hnoriega@tep.com. Should you have any questions, please contact the Designer for this project F. Kilpatrick at (520) 918-8227. Sincerely, Henrietta Noriega Office Specialist Design/Build hn Enclosures cc: P. Gehlen, City of Tucson (e-mail) TCB Const. Developer Owner - Letter only E. Torres - Tucson Electric Power Company |
| 02/14/2007 | PAUL MACHADO | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | To: Patricia Gehlen DATE: February 8, 2007 CDRC/Zoning Manager SUBJECT: Enclave at Sarnoff, 3727 S. Sarnoff Drive Subdivision Plat S06-267 (S04-175)(First Review) T14S, R15E, Section 28 RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Subdivision Plat and Drainage Report. The Subdivision Plat (SP) and Drainage Report (DR) cannot be approved as submitted. Please address the following review comments prior to the next submittal. Subdivision Plat: 1. Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the DP. 2. As per the Federal ADA requirements, all wheel chair ramps shall have the truncated domes instead of the standard grooves that are shown on COT SD 207. Aside from the Truncated Domes, all wheel chair ramps shall be constructed in accordance with COT SD 207. 3. A conceptual grading plan will be required for this project per 2-03.2.4.K. 4. Wheelchair ramps are required at both sides of the intersection at Sarnoff Drive and at the BC at the cul-de-sac. 5. The 1' no access esmt. should be shown as dashed. 6. A 6' Sidewalk will be required along Escalante Road per D.S. 3-01.3.3.A. 7. This is very difficult plan to read. There are lines that appear to delineate proposed features that are shaded and that is usually used for existing and lines that are thick and then thin again. For example the 6' utility line and the centerline is shaded when it should be shown as solid dashed and solid centerline. Another example is the lot lines in front of 7 and 8 are thin while the lot lines in front of lots 5 and 6 are thick. Consistency should also be a part of the Tentative Plat. 8. Please provide property description per D.S. 2-02.2.1.3. 9. Indicate where the access point is for Lot 1 by a star. 10. Label existing and future sight visibility triangles per D.S. 2-02.2.1.10. 11. Please list estimated cut & fill quantities per D.S. 2-02.2.1.17. 12. Please show dimensioned right-of-way, including any applicable Major Streets and Routes (MS&R) Plan right-of-way per D.S. 2-02.2.1.19. 13. Add the basin(s) maintenance responsibility note per S.M.D.D.F.M. 2.3.1.6 C 1 and 2 to the TP/DP. 14. Dimension from street monument lines to existing and proposed curbs, sidewalks, driveways, and utility lines per D.S. 2-02.2.1.21. 15. The improvement plans for Sarnoff Drive (I-77-022) show a 4' sidewalk and a 2' wedge curb along the street. Verify the existing conditions along Sarnoff Drive. 16. Please provide existing topographic contours at intervals not exceeding two (2) feet and/or spot elevations as pertinent and Bench Mark based on City of Tucson Datum, including City Field Book and page number per D.S. 2-02.2.1.23. 17. Show Tentative plat number (S06-267) on all sheets per D.S. 2-02.2.1.29. 18. A permit or a private improvement agreement will be necessary for any work performed within the Right-of-way. Contact Permits and Codes at (520) 791-5100 for permit information. 19. Please show a typical cross section of the P.A.A.L. or call out the percentage of slopes. Call out the GB at the D/W, if applicable. Show the cross-slope percentage on Section B-B. 20. Add note: "Depress all landscaped areas 6" maximum for water harvesting". 21. "A grading permit and Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plans (SWPPP's) will be required for this project. Submit 4 sets of grading and SWPPP's with text, upon completion and submittal of a grading permit application. A grading permit may not be issued prior to site plan approval. Subsequent comments may be necessary, depending upon the nature and extent of revisions that occur to the plans". Drainage Report: 1. Submit a detailed response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the DR. 2. Additional comments may be forth coming due to the addition of the required information. 3. Include a Hydrologic data sheet for the existing conditions in the DR. 4. The det./ret. basin is far below the existing adjacent grade, show the cross sections of the basin in a realistic manner. 5. This project is in a balanced basin. Detention is also required. 6. The time of concentration is seems too low, include in the DR map where the longest watercourse was measured to calculate the avg. slope. Perhaps two sub-basins should be considered, one avg. slope for the 7. The numbers used for the Hydrologic data for the future conditions are seem to be for existing conditions. For example the runoff coefficient for highly urban should be 0.86 instead of 0.76 for a developed residential subdivision used. The other numbers used on the Hydrologic data sheet should also be checked. Revise as required. 8. Show the velocity of the stormwater as heads toward the scupper inlet at the basin. It appears that the water may pass the scupper instead of entering it. 9. Show the project address on the cover of the DR. 10. Add the basin(s) maintenance responsibility note and checklist per S.M.D.D.F.M. 2.3.1.6 C 1 and 2 to the DR. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-5550 x1193 or Paul.Machado@ci.tucsonaz.govs Paul P. Machado Senior Engineering Associate City of Tucson/Development Services Department 201 N. Stone Avenue P.O. Box 27210 Tucson, Arizona 85726-7210 (520) 791-5550 x1193 office (520) 879-8010 fax C:/3727 S. Sarnoff Drive CDRC |
| 02/21/2007 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES February 21, 2007 Lloyd W. Rogers P.E. Roger Civil Engineering 1765 West Klamath Drive Tucson, Arizona 85704 Subject: S06-267 Enclave at Sarnoff Tentative Plat Dear Lloyd: Your submittal of December 22, 2006 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a DETAILED cover letter explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLACKLINES MUST BE FOLDED 7 Copies Revised Tentative Plat (Traffic, Landscape, Real Estate, Fire, Zoning, Engineering, DSD) 4 Copies Revised Landscape Plan (Landscape, Zoning, Engineering, DSD) 2 Copies Title Report (Real Estate, DSD) 2 Copies Revised Drainage Report (Engineering, DSD) Should you have any questions, please call me at 791-5608 extension 1179. Sincerely, Patricia Gehlen CDRC Manager All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: 888-8571 Tp-resubmittal |
| 12/21/2006 | MARILYN KALTHOFF | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 12/26/2006 | JOSE ORTIZ | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Denied | December 26, 2006 ACTIVITY NUMBER: S06-267 PROJECT NAME: Enclave At Sarnoff PROJECT ADDRESS: 3727 S Sarnoff Dr PROJECT REVIEWER: Jose E. Ortiz PE, Traffic Engineer Resubmittal Required: Traffic Engineering does not recommend approval of the Tentative Plat; therefore a revised Tentative Plat is required for re-submittal. The following items must be revised or added to the plat. 1. Include a response letter with the next submittal that states how all comments have been addressed. 2. Parking is not allowed in cul-de-sacs from PRC to PRC. So indicate on the plans by showing no parking signs on the plans. (DS 3-01.0 fig 20) (straight cul) 3. Please label on the plan sheet whether the proposed road is public or private. 4. A private improvement agreement (PIA) will be necessary for the proposed work to be performed within the Right-of-way. An approved tentative plat is required prior to applying for a PIA. Contact the PIA Coordinator for additional PIA information at 791-5550 ext. 1107. 5. The access points shall have 25' radius curb returns. (DS 3-01.0 figure 6) If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-4259 x76730 or Jose.Ortiz@tucsonaz.gov |