Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Plan Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Plan Number - S06-235
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 05/11/2007 | PAUL MACHADO | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | To: Patricia Gehlen DATE: July 19, 2007 CDRC/Zoning Manager SUBJECT: Wootton Property, Houghton Rd-Tanque Verde Rd. Tentative Plat S06-235 (First Review) T14S, R15E, Section 02 RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Tentative Plat and Drainage Report. The Tentative Plat (TP) and Drainage Report (DR) cannot be approved as submitted. Please address the following review comments prior to the next submittal. Tentative Plat: 1. Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the TP. 2. Sidewalks are required as part of any new development of all properties. All new subdivisions and applications for building permits shall provide five (5) foot wide sidewalks (six (6) foot along any M.S. and R. designated streets) per D.S. 3-01.3.3.A. Per previous comment. 3. Plot the existing flood plain on the tentative plat. See Drainage Report comments. Per previous comment. The floodplain must match with what is shown on the FEMA without a LOMR or CLOMR. 4. Label existing and future sight visibility triangles per D.S. 2-02.2.1.10. The proposed street exiting onto the existing road with no name (private), shall show the SVT's also. 5. Please list estimated cut & fill quantities per D.S. 2-02.2.1.17. The estimated fill quantities may increase by having to raise the pad elevation 1' above the WSEL in the flood plain. 6. Please provide existing topographic contours at intervals not exceeding two (2) feet and/or spot elevations as pertinent and Bench Mark based on City of Tucson Datum, including City Field Book and page number per D.S. 2-02.2.1.23. 7. Complete Subdivision plan number (S06-235) on all sheets per D.S. 2-02.2.1.29. 8. Placement of fill in excess of 2' above existing grade at any location in the outer 100' of the developing site is not allowed and/or shall meet the requirements per D.S. 11-01. Please address. Per previous comment. See comment no. 6. 9. "A grading permit and Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plans (SWPPP's) will be required for this project. Submit 4 sets of grading and SWPPP's with text, upon completion and submittal of a grading permit application. A grading permit may not be issued prior to site plan approval. Subsequent comments may be necessary, depending upon the nature and extent of revisions that occur to the plans". 10. Urban engineering has requested that the City of Tucson accept the wildcat dumping along the South bank of the Agua Caliente wash as 100-year bank protection. As stated in the past to the client and Urban engineering, the City of Tucson does not have any engineering reports and/or plans to verify the proper construction of any bank protection adjacent to the project. Therefore the City of Tucson cannot consider the wildcat dumping as proper bank protection. The Tentative plat cannot be approved prior to the addressing of the current violation for illegal dumping in the floodplain. Drainage Report: 1. Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the DR. 2. This review was performed for Tentative Plat purposes only. 3. The maximum allowable rise in the WSEL caused by an encroachment into the 100-year floodplain is one-tenth of a foot per S.M.D.D.F.M chap. 8.4. 4. The map used is reproduced from WEST Consultants and reflects "Proposed" conditions after the dikes upstream of Tanque Verde Road are raised. The cross-sections are not identical and are oriented slightly different from model to model. Provide a map using the "Existing" model. 5. Plot the existing flood plain on the tentative plat. 6. Demonstrate all weather access for both lots per S.M.D.D.F.M chap. 8.4, chap. 11.2 and chap. 12.2. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-5550 x1193 or Paul.Machado@ci.tucsonaz.govs Paul P. Machado Senior Engineering Associate City of Tucson/Development Services Department 201 N. Stone Avenue P.O. Box 27210 Tucson, Arizona 85726-7210 (520) 791-5550 x1193 office (520) 879-8010 fax C:/Houghton Rd-Tanque Verde Rd 2 |
| 05/22/2007 | FRODRIG2 | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | The Landscape Section recommends approval subject to the following conditions. 1) Verification and approval of the floodplain limits is required for ERZ compliance. 2) Label "set aside" areas as Natural Undisturbed Open Space, not just Natural Open Space on the tentative and final plats and related plans. DS 2-15.3.5 3) All lettering and dimensions shall be the equivalent of twelve (0.12") point or greater in size. Revise the landscape/NPP submittal to comply. DS 2-05.2.1.A 4) The NPP cover sheet indicates that a landscape covenant was recorded on 4/24/06. Provide a copy of the recorded document. 5) The landscape border (scenic route buffer area) is usually required to be recorded as common area and maintained by the homeowners association (HOA) per LUC 3.7.2.4.A.2.c. Given that the buffer is already proposed as NUOS and that lot reconfiguration due to creation of common area may require a redesign, it would be acceptable to include NUOS areas in note 29 as an area subject to the disclosure related to prohibition of development. Please revise the note in order to clarify that the LUC requirement is met or exceeded or provide the required common area. |
| 05/22/2007 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 05/22/2007 | JIM EGAN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | |
| 05/31/2007 | JOSE ORTIZ | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Approved | |
| 06/01/2007 | KAROL ARAGONEZ | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Karol Aragonez Planner PROJECT: S06-235 Wooton Property Tentative Plat Resubmittal TRANSMITTAL DATE: May 18, 2007 DUE DATE: June 4, 2007 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. Please add to general note 10 "The total miles of new public streets are zero (0)". DS 2-03.2.2.D.1.b 2. Please relabel Common Area "A" as an ingress/egress easement for vehicle and pedestrian traffic. This area is not a separate lot or block. Revise the title block and detail B/2 to reflect this change. 3. Please provide the square footage of Common Area "B". 4. Even though parking is allowed within the cul-de-sac on-street parking or common area parking is still required per COT street cross sections. Visitor parking spaces on individual lots is not allowed. A DSMR would need to be approved to allow parking easements on lots 5 and 6 and to eliminate on-street parking along street frontage. 5. For residential development with ADTs of less than one hundred and forty (140), sidewalks are not required provided the street has vertical curbs and concrete driveways providing pedestrian and disabled pedestrian access to the dwelling unit on each lot. A pedestrian path must be designated that is a minimum of five (5) feet in width encompassed by the ingress/egress easement. DS 3-01.3.3.A.4 Overlay Zone related comments (SCZ and ERZ) 6. The tentative plat may not be approved prior to Overlay Zone application approval. (LUC 2.8.2) (LUC 2.8.1) (D.S. 2-12) (D.S. 9-04) 7. Please clarify on the tentative plat that the thirty (30) foot undisturbed natural landscape buffer extends the entire length of the proposed frontage along Houghton Road. It appears that it ends at the middle of Lot 1. 8. Please correct SCZ note 1 replacing the subdivision case number S06-235 with the overlay case number T06SA00279. 9. Please revise SCZ note 7 to read - Building or structure surfaces, which are visable from Houghton Road will have "earth tone" colors. 10. Once Engineering has completed their review of the tentative plat, landscape plan, and ERR and have approved that submittal, Zoning Review will then approve ERZ. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Karol Aragonez, (520) 791-5550, ext. 74960. KAA S:\zoning review\karol\planning\cdrc\tentativeplat\S06-235tpr.doc RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised tentative plat, CC&R's and additional requested documents. |
| 06/01/2007 | ROGER HOWLETT | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Denied | DEPARTMENT OF URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application (1st review) CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT S06-235 Wootton Property, L. 1-7 () Tentative Plat ( ) Development Plan () Landscape Plan/ERZ Mitigation Plan/NPPO ( ) Revised Plan/Plat ( ) Board of Adjustment ( ) Other CROSS REFERENCE: N/A; C9-97-24 denied M&C, Nov. 15, 2005 NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: Bear Canyon Neighborhood Plan GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: Houghton Rd. is Scenic Route COMMENTS DUE BY: June 4, 2007 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: ( ) No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment ( ) Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions ( ) RCP Proposal Complies With Plan Policies () See Additional Comments Attached ( ) No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: () Resubmittal Required: () Tentative Plat ( ) Development Plan () Landscape Plan ( ) Other REVIEWER: Joanne Hershenhorn 791-4505 DATE: 6/1/07 Wootton Property, L. 1-7 S06-235 Please indicate, in a general note on the tentative plat (TP), the purpose(s) of each type of Common Area. If there is no Common Area C, please remove the reference to it from sheet 1 of 4. Are the natural open space and protected riparian areas entirely coincident? Please include symbols in the legend on sheet 1 of 4. On sheet 3 of 4 at the northwest edge of the plat area, is the area northwest of the cross-hatched area part of Common Area B? Please clarify. The landscape plan shows a cross-hatched area (natural open space) on the southeastern boundary of lot 1, yet this isn’t shown with crosshatches on sheet 4/4 of the TP. Please revise these so that they are consistent. The landscape plan indicates the cross hatched area is natural open space. Should some of this (i.e., protected riparian and floodplain areas) be designated as natural undisturbed open space? |
| 06/04/2007 | KAY MARKS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Approved | 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 KAY MARKS ADDRESSING OFFICIAL PH: 740-6480 FAX #: 740-6370 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL SUBJECT: S06-235 WOOTTON PROPERTY/REVISED TENTATIVE PLAT DATE: 6/04/07 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and we hereby approve this project. NOTE: ON FINAL PLAT: 1.) Correct page numbers on pg. 1. ***The Pima County Addressing Section can use digital CAD drawing files when submitted with your final plat Mylar. These CAD files can be submitted through Pima County Addressing. The digital CAD drawing files expedite the addressing and permitting processes when we are able to insert this digital data into the County’s Geographic Information System. Your support is greatly appreciated.*** es |
| 06/06/2007 | FRODRIG2 | COT NON-DSD | OCSD | Denied | >>> Frank Sousa 06/06/2007 9:41 AM >>> This comment applies to both resubmittals. The depicted 100-year floodplain boundary could not be verified with data available from either the Pima County Regional Flood Control District (PCRFCD) or from Development Services Department staff. The revised rezoning report appears to have the used the appropriate floodplain delineation on the revised development plan, though that revised plan does not appear to match the current resubmittal. Please correct the floodplain delineation to match the PCRFCD proposed floodplain delineation and correct all associated documents (ERR, tentative plat, etc) accordingly. Francis X. Sousa Lead Hydrologist Department of Transportation Engineering Division Stormwater Section City of Tucson 520-837-6581, voice 520-791-4373, fax frank.sousa@tucsonaz.gov |
| 06/06/2007 | FRODRIG2 | COT NON-DSD | OCSD | Denied | >>> Frank Sousa 06/06/2007 9:41 AM >>> This comment applies to both resubmittals. The depicted 100-year floodplain boundary could not be verified with data available from either the Pima County Regional Flood Control District (PCRFCD) or from Development Services Department staff. The revised rezoning report appears to have the used the appropriate floodplain delineation on the revised development plan, though that revised plan does not appear to match the current resubmittal. Please correct the floodplain delineation to match the PCRFCD proposed floodplain delineation and correct all associated documents (ERR, tentative plat, etc) accordingly. Francis X. Sousa Lead Hydrologist Department of Transportation Engineering Division Stormwater Section City of Tucson 520-837-6581, voice 520-791-4373, fax frank.sousa@tucsonaz.gov |
| 06/06/2007 | FRODRIG2 | COT NON-DSD | REAL ESTATE | Denied | S06-235 Wootton Property: Resubmittal - CDRC - Tentative Plat Review - Request a "1' No Vehicle Access Easement" along the W. boundary of proposed Subdivision. |
| 06/25/2007 | FRODRIG2 | PDEQ | PIMA COUNTY DEPT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY | Denied | comments on file. Will fax with Zoning Decision Letter. |
| 06/25/2007 | GLENN HICKS | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Denied | DATE: June 22, 2007 TO: DSD_CDRC@ tucsonaz.gov FROM: Glenn Hicks Parks and Recreation 791-4873 ext. 215 Glenn.Hicks@tucsonaz.gov SUBJECT: S06-235 Wootten Property: Tentative Plat(6-22-07) Denied. The Agua Caliente Wash is identified as Trail #1 and as a First Priority - Primary Trail in the Eastern Pima County Trail System Master Plan. A publicly accessible dedicated trail corridor is required for the trail. Please show extent of trail corridor to be dedicated. Corridor should be a minimum of 50 ft wide and extend from Bonanza Avenue to the north east end of the subject project. |
| 07/19/2007 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES July 19, 2007 Carl Bueter Urban Engineering, Inc 877 S. Alvernon Way, Suite 200 Tucson, Arizona 85711 Subject: S06-235 Wootton Property Tentative Plat Dear Carl: Your submittal of May 4, 2007 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a DETAILED cover letter explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLACKLINES MUST BE FOLDED 9 Copies Revised Tentative Plat (Zoning, Real Estate, Landscape, DUPD, OCSD, PDEQ, Engineering, Parks and Recreation, DSD) 7 Copies Revised Landscape Plan (Zoning, Landscape, DUPD, OCSD, Engineering, Parks and Recreation, DSD) 2 Copies Revised NPPO Plan (Landscape, DSD) 2 Copies Revised Drainage Report (Engineering, DSD) Should you have any questions, please call me at 791-5608 extension 1179. Sincerely, Patricia Gehlen CDRC Manager All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: 318-3808 Tp-resubmittal |