Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Plan Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Plan Number - S06-235
Review Name: TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01/03/2007 | PAUL MACHADO | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | To: Patricia Gehlen DATE: December 20, 2006 CDRC/Zoning Manager SUBJECT: Wootton Property, Houghton Rd-Tanque Verde Rd Tentative Plat S06-235 (First Review) T14S, R15E, Section 02 RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Tentative Plat and Drainage Report. The Tentative Plat (TP) and Drainage Report (DR) cannot be approved as submitted. Please address the following review comments prior to the next submittal. Tentative Plat: 1. Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the TP. 2. Sidewalks are required as part of any new development of all properties. All new subdivisions and applications for building permits shall provide five (5) foot wide sidewalks (six (6) foot along any M.S and R. designated streets) per D.S. 3-01.3.3.A. 3. Plot the existing flood plain on the tentative plat. See Drainage Report comments. 4. West's water surface elevations are in NGVD29. Convert the WSEL's to NAVD88 and show both WSEL's on the tentative plat. See Drainage Report comments. 5. Delineate the undisturbed 50' resource zone on the plat. 6. A floodplain use permit is required for this project. 7. Please provide property description per D.S. 2-02.2. 8. Label existing and future sight visibility triangles per D.S. 2-02.2.1.10. 9. Please provide Drainage patterns and finished grades per D.S. 2-02.2.1.16. 10. Please list estimated cut & fill quantities per D.S. 2-02.2.1.17. 11. Please show dimensioned right-of-way, including any applicable Major Streets and Routes (MS&R) Plan right-of-way per D.S. 2-02.2.1.19. 12. Dimension from street monument lines to existing and proposed curbs, sidewalks, driveways, and utility lines per D.S. 2-02.2.1.21. 13. Location and orientation of existing major physical features, such as railroad tracks and drainageways per D.S. 2-02.2.1.22. 14. Please provide existing topographic contours at intervals not exceeding two (2) feet and/or spot elevations as pertinent and Bench Mark based on City of Tucson Datum, including City Field Book and page number per D.S. 2-02.2.1.23. 15. Complete Subdivision plan number (S06-235) on all sheets per D.S. 2-02.2.1.29. 16. Placement of fill in excess of 2' above existing grade at any location in the outer 100' of the developing site is not allowed and/or shall meet the requirements per D.S. 11-01. Please address. 17. A permit or a private improvement agreement will be necessary for any work performed within the Right-of-way. Contact Permits and Codes at (520) 791-5100 for permit information. 18. Add note: "Depress all landscaped areas 6" maximum for water harvesting". 19. "A grading permit and Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plans (SWPPP's) will be required for this project. Submit 4 sets of grading and SWPPP's with text, upon completion and submittal of a grading permit application. A grading permit may not be issued prior to site plan approval. Subsequent comments may be necessary, depending upon the nature and extent of revisions that occur to the plans". Drainage Report: 1. Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the DR. 2. This review was performed for Tentative Plat purposes only. 3. The maximum allowable rise in the WSEL caused by an encroachment into the 100-year floodplain is one-tenth of a foot per S.M.D.D.F.M chap. 8.4. 4. The map used is reproduced from WEST Consultants and reflects "Proposed" conditions after the dikes upstream of Tanque Verde Road are raised. The cross-sections are not identical and are oriented slightly different from model to model. Provide a map using the "Existing" model. 5. Plot the existing flood plain on the tentative plat. 6. West's water surface elevations are in NGVD29. Convert the WSEL's to NAVD88 and show both WSEL's on the tentative plat. 7. Demonstrate all weather access for both lots per S.M.D.D.F.M chap. 8.4, chap. 11.2 and chap. 12.2. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-5550 x1193 or Paul.Machado@ci.tucsonaz.govs Paul P. Machado Senior Engineering Associate City of Tucson/Development Services Department 201 N. Stone Avenue P.O. Box 27210 Tucson, Arizona 85726-7210 (520) 791-5550 x1193 office (520) 879-8010 fax C:/Houghton Rd-Tanque Verde Rd |
| 01/05/2007 | GLENN HICKS | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Denied | DATE: January 05, 2007 TO: Ferne Rodriguez, Development Services FROM: Glenn Hicks Parks and Recreation 791-4873 ext. 215 Glenn.Hicks@tucsonaz.gov CC: Patricia Gehlen Joanne Hershenhorn Steve Anderson SUBJECT: S06-235 Wootten Property: Tentative Plat(11-9-06) Denied. The Agua Caliente Wash is identified as Trail #1 and as a First Priority - Primary Trail in the Eastern Pima County Trail System Master Plan. A dedicated trail corridor is required for the trail. Staff is withholding comments regarding the specifics of the trail corridor until there is more information regarding Environmental Resource Zone and floodplain issues. Staff will also require approval of the plans by the Pima County Natural Resources Parks and Recreation Department. |
| 01/05/2007 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES January 5, 2007 Carl Bueter Urban Engineering, Inc 877 S. Alvernon Way, Suite 200 Tucson, Arizona 85711 Subject: S06-235 Wootton Property Tentative Plat Dear Carl: Your submittal of November 9, 2006 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a DETAILED cover letter explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLACKLINES MUST BE FOLDED 12 Copies Revised Tentative Plat (Zoning, Fire, Traffic, Real Estate, Landscape, Addressing, DUPD, OCSD, PDEQ, Engineering, Parks and Recreation, DSD) 7 Copies Revised Landscape Plan (Zoning, Landscape, DUPD, OCSD, Engineering, Parks and Recreation, DSD) 2 Copies Revised NPPO Plan (Landscape, DSD) 2 Copies Revised Drainage Report (Engineering, DSD) IF THE PLAT IS REVISED TO BE A RESIDENTIAL CLUSTER PROJECT (RCP) PER REVIEW COMMENTS, PLEASE CONTACT CDRC MANAGER PRIOR TO RESUBMITTAL. ADDITIONAL REVIEW AGENCIES MAY BE REQUIRED TO SEE THE REVISIONS. Should you have any questions, please call me at 791-5608 extension 1179. Sincerely, Patricia Gehlen CDRC Manager All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: 318-3808 Tp-resubmittal |
| 11/09/2006 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 11/16/2006 | TOM MARTINEZ | OTHER AGENCIES | AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION | Approved | NO COMMENT S06-235 URBAN ENGINEERING, INC. WOOTTON PROPERTY -------------------------------------------------------- Confidentiality and Nondisclosure Notice: This email transmission and any attachments are intended for use by the person(s)/entity(ies) named above and may contain confidential/privileged information. Any unauthorized use, disclosure or distribution is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by e-mail, and delete or destroy all copies plus attachments. |
| 11/30/2006 | KAROL ARAGONEZ | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Karol Aragonez Planner PROJECT: S06-235 Wootton Property Tentative Plat TRANSMITTAL DATE: November 28, 2006 DUE DATE: December 8, 2006 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. Section 4.1.7.1, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a tentative plat. If, at the end of that time, the tentative plat has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this tentative plat is November 8, 2006. 2. Case number S06-235 has been assigned to this tentative plat (TP). Please place this number in the right corner of all sheets of the TP, landscape plan, NPPO, and any other associated sheets. It is not clear whether this project is being developed as proposed R-1 zoning or as existing SR zoning designation since proposed lots are 3.3 acres. If utilizing Proposed R-1 zoning complete the rezoning case number in the lower right corner of all sheets of the TP, landscape plan, NPPO, and any other associated sheets, provide a copy of the rezoning conditions and a separate response letter detailing compliance with rezoning conditions. Correct general note 1. The proposed zoning of the property would be R-1 not CR-1. If developing as SR please remove references to rezoning case number in lower right corner of all sheets and remove proposed zoning reference in general note 1. Further comments may be generated on next review depending on what is provided. DS 2-03.2.2.B.1 3. Please add to general note 4 "Sec. 2.8.6, Environmental Resource Zone (ERZ)". DS 2-03.2.2.B.7 4. Please add to general note 10 "The total miles of new public streets are zero (0)". DS 2-03.2.2.D.1.b 5. Please draw all existing easements on the plan along with recordation information, location, width, and purpose. If an easement is no longer in use and scheduled to be vacated or has been abandoned, so indicate. If none exist provide response to reviewer's comments. Also if easements are purposed please draw, dimension and label as to their purpose and whether they will be public or private. If none exist provide response to reviewer's comments. DS 2-03.2.3.C & J 6. The original property consisted of parcels 133-03-282K, 282M, and 283E. The plat does not address the remainder of the property that was part of 133-03-283E, mainly within the Agua Caliente Wash. Was the parcel previously split? If so was it approved by the City of Tucson? If there was not a split approved then the entire property must be included as part of the subdivision plat. Because the remainder of the lot would be zoned SR the new lot would have to meet the minimum lot size of 3.3 acres. Please address. 7. Please clearly show the zoning boundary between the RX-1 and SR at the north of the subdivision. DS 2-03.2.4.D 8. Single family subdivisions require visitor parking be provided either on street parking on both sides at a ratio of 0.25 space per unit or in a common parking area at a ratio of 1 space per unit. The street cross section does not provide for two-sided on-street parking. Visitor parking must be evenly distributed and place no more than one hundred and fifty (150) feet from any lot. Please refer to DS 3-05.2.4 and DS 3-01.10.0 Figure 2. Once provided further comments may be generated. 9. The street cross section for the thirty (30) foot private roadway should be labeled as proposed and not existing. If this project is being developed as an RCP five (5) foot wide sidewalks will be required. For residential development other than RCP with ADTs of less than one hundred and forty (140), sidewalks are not required provided the street has vertical curbs and concrete driveways providing pedestrian and disabled pedestrian access to the dwelling unit on each lot. A pedestrian path must be designated that is a minimum of five (5) feet in width along the right-of-way. DS 3-01.3.3.A.4 10. Please show future proposed improvements to Houghton Road as per the MS&R Plan and for the private easement to the south. Houghton will require six (6) foot sidewalks, vertical curbing, pavement etc. The private access drive would require five (5) foot wide sidewalks, vertical curbing, etc. along the length of the proposed subdivision. The street cross section should be fully dimensioned to reflect these requirements. Please contact Engineering and Traffic Engineering for full requirements for street frontages. 11. Because of the variation of zoning designations surrounding the project site please provide setback dimensions for each lot based on the maximum height being proposed (24 feet). This will replace standard lot typicals usually provided. The following setbacks are required: a) From R-1 (if being rezoned to R-1) - six (6) feet or two-thirds (2/3) the height of the exterior building wall, which ever is greatest. b) From SR - twenty-five (25) feet c) From RX-1 - twenty (20) feet d) From O-3 - the height of the exterior building wall e) From Houghton Road - three (3) times the height of the structure per SCZ (maximum 24 feet) measured from the future right-of-way line. f) Streets ADT over 140 and less than 1000 - twenty-one (21) feet or the height of the exterior building wall, which ever is greatest measured from back of travel lane. g) Streets ADT of 140 or less - five (5) feet measured from back of future curb; or one-half (1/2) height of exterior building wall measured from back of future curb; or one foot measured from property line or from nearest edge of the future sidewalk location. h) Garages must comply to LUC Sec. 3.2.6.5.B.2 DS 2-03.2.4.M Overlay Zone related comments (SCZ and ERZ) 12. The Overlay Zone case number must be noted in the lower right corner of each sheet of the tentative plat, landscape, and NPPO plans. All required elements of the SCZ (i.e. 30 foot buffer, view corridors, approved colors, etc.) and ERZ as shown on the approved Overlay Zone plan must be added to the tentative plat, along with date of approval and any conditions placed on that approval. The tentative plat may not be approved prior to Overlay Zone application approval. (LUC 2.8.2) (LUC 2.8.1) (D.S. 2-12) (D.S. 9-04) 13. Please include a thirty (30) foot buffer on the tentative plat. Label the buffer "30 foot undisturbed natural buffer to be preserved and maintained in it's natural state". 14. Please add the four hundred (400) foot SCZ corridor boundary to plat. The tentative plat currently shows this as two hundred (200) feet. Correct SCZ note 2 to read four hundred (400) feet instead of two hundred (200) feet. Please correct. 15. Please add the view corridor calculations to the plan. Any development which has at least two hundred (200) feet of frontage along a scenic route will have view corridors, with a combined width of at least twenty (20) percent of that frontage, which allow vision from a least one point into and through that portion of the project. 16. Please add the appropriate following notes to the tentative, development, or site plan plat. a) Individual SCZ case not required for each lot, but site plans, elevations, and colors must be submitted for each lot for review of compliance to Scenic Corridor Zone case number (please add SCZ case number) for height, colors, and setbacks. This development is subject to the review and approval of the special application for the Scenic Corridor Overlay. The Special application case number is (add case number).The special application has been reviewed and approved, approval date (add date), without conditions. b) Maximum height of structures will be 1/3 the distance of the structure from the future right-of-way of Houghton Road, not to exceed 24 feet. c) No grading beyond that is necessary for siting of buildings, drives, private yards, and structural improvements. All viable vegetation with a caliper of 4 inches or greater and all saguaro cacti will be preserved or relocated on the site per the Native Plant and Preservation Ordinance. d) Drainageways are to be maintained in their natural state. e) All new utilities for development on private property or public right-of-way along Houghton Road will be underground. Trenching is permitted for the placement of utilities lines, if area is revegetated in accordance with Land Use Code Sec. 3.7.5.2.D f) Building or structure surfaces, which are visible from Houghton Road will have natural earth tone colors, which are, predominate within the surrounding landscape. (Please note when using this note a color matrix is not required. It is suggested that specific color designations be removed from the tentative plat and overlay review plan.) g) Fencing and freestanding walls facing Houghton Road will meet material restrictions in Land Use Code Sec. 3.7.3, Screening Requirements. h) All areas between the MS & R right-of-way line and the existing street right-of-way that are disturbed by development shall be revegetated with native vegetation. i) All disturbed areas on the site that are visible from Houghton Road and are not covered by permanent improvements shall be revegetated with native plants, plants from the Drought Tolerant Plant List, or a combination of both. j) Exposed cut and fill slopes shall be no greater than 1-foot rise or fall over a 3-foot length. 17. Regulations for signs are stipulated in Sec. 3-32, Scenic Route District, of Chapter 3, Advertising and Outdoor Signs, of the Tucson Code, and further supplemented by the following: a) On any conflicts in requirements between the LUC and Sec. 3-32, the more strict of the two prevails. b) Signs are to use colors, which are predominant within the surrounding landscape, such as desert and earth tones. c) No commercial advertising sign, except a sign pertaining to a use conducted on the premises or a sign advertising the sale or lease of the property upon which the sign is located, and no billboard shall be erected within four hundred (400) feet of the right-of-way line on any street or route designated "scenic". 18. Development in the ERZ has two options available for development. a) The ERZ does not apply when there is no encroachment of the 100-year floodplain. Temporary fencing is required between the project site and the floodplain area. b) If encroachment occurs requiring an Environmental Resource Report and a mitigation plan to be reviewed by Stormwater Advisory Committee (SAC), who then makes recommendations to the DSD Director. 19. Residential development of four (4) or more dwelling units is allowed only as a Residential Cluster Project (RCP), except as provided in Sec. 2.8.6.3.B. Please review this section and provide the required information for compliance. Be aware requirements of this section may result in a redesign of the project site. 20. Please add note that states "No grubbing, grading, or construction will occur on site which includes areas designated to be retained in a natural state, until those designated areas are temporarily fenced. All temporary fencing will be field inspected before construction on the site begins. Fencing will be removed only upon completion of construction". If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Karol Aragonez, (520) 791-5550, ext. 1197. KAA S:\zoning review\karol\planning\cdrc\tentativeplat\S06-235tp.doc RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised tentative plat, CC&R's and additional requested documents. |
| 11/30/2006 | FRODRIG2 | OTHER AGENCIES | PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS | Approved | Transportation Information for Rezoning, Subdivision, and Development Requests Delivered to: Date Delivered: Development Services - City of Tucson 11/30/2006 Case Number Project Name Average number of daily trips (ADT) forecasted as a result of the proposed development This information is provided for jurisdictional planning departments to assess the impact of the proposed residential or commercial development on surrounding traffic patterns and roads. If the forecasted daily traffic exceeds 500 average daily trips, a more detailed analysis is also provided. S06-235 70 Wootton Property Pima Association of Governments Sandra C. Holland, Data Services 177 N. Church Ave., Suite 405, Tucson, Arizona 85701-1127 (520) 792-1093 FAX (520) 620-6981 |
| 12/01/2006 | JCLARK3 | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Approved | * No known landfill within 1000 feet of this development. * All lots have street side frontage. Approved for APC street side service. |
| 12/04/2006 | JIM EGAN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Denied | Almost all the lots have buildable areas over 150 feet from fire access. Automatic fire sprinklers are required for homes in these areas. A turnaround will be required at the end of the road at lot seven or beyond. Please add the following notes to the plan. 1. Additional fire hydrants shall be provided by the developer as required by the fire code in accordance with C.O.T. Standards. 2. An approved water supply capable of supplying the projected fire flow for fire protection shall be provided and extended to serve directly any and all subdivided properties. 3. "NO PARKING FIRE LANE" signs shall be provided as needed to provide 20' clear unobstructed width along all fire apparatus access roadways in accordance with the fire code. 4. On street parking shall be prohibited on both sides and signs shall be installed so indicating. |
| 12/06/2006 | JOSE ORTIZ | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Denied | December 6, 2006 ACTIVITY NUMBER: S06-235 PROJECT NAME: Wootton Property PROJECT ADDRESS: Houghton Rd/Tanque Verde Rd PROJECT REVIEWER: Jose E. Ortiz PE, Traffic Engineer Resubmittal Required: Traffic Engineering does not recommend approval of the Tentative Plat; therefore a revised Tentative Plat is required for re-submittal. The following items must be revised or added to the plat. 1. Include a response letter with the next submittal that states how all comments have been addressed. 2. To ensure no conflict with future Right of Way call out the existing and future Right of Way for Houghton Road per the City of Tucson's Major Streets and Routes plan. 3. A permit or a private improvement agreement will be necessary for any work performed within the Right-of-way. Contact Permits and Codes at (520) 791-5100 for permit information. 4. The access points shall have 25' radius curb returns off of Houghton Road. (DS 3-01.0 figure 6) Ensure that the private road intersecting with Houghton has 25' radius curb returns. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-4259 x305 or Jose.Ortiz@tucsonaz.gov |
| 12/07/2006 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1) Reference the Environmental Resource Zone and note that the plat is designed to comply with the overlay zone criteria. DS 2-03.2.2.B.7 Revise the plans to comply with the review comments for Overlay Case T06SA00279 2) The Protected Riparian Area is to be delineated on the tentative plat per DS 2-13.2.6.B 3) The Final Plat is required to show the Protected Riparian Area in a surveyable manner and to designate the PRA as restricted from further development. DS 2-03.6.4.L 4) An ERR is also required when the Set-aside aside method is utilized for compliance with the Native Plant Preservation regulations. LUC 3.8.6.4.A The Report shall include the items listed in DS 1-07, Exhibit III and an assessment of areas of NUOS and shall prioritize the natural resource value of vegetated areas on the site in conformance with the intent and purpose of LUC 3.8. The natural resource value for an area shall be assessed by the consideration of factors such as: A. Health, size, density, and variety of native plant species; and B. The visual resource value of the area(s); and C. The potential to maximize the preservation of contiguous areas of NUOS both on- and off-site. 5) Show areas set aside as NUOS on the tentative and final plats. DS 2-15.3.5 This plat may include both Natural Undisturbed Open Space and Protected Riparian Areas. 6) Areas set-aside per 3.8.6.4.B cannot include the area(s) dedicated to utility and other easements. Revise the calculations if necessary and identify any easements on the native Plant Preservation Plans. LUC 3.8.8.1 7) The inventory totals on sheet "ERZ" do not appear to correspond with designations shown on the native plant inventory (page 1). Revise as necessary. 8) Add the CDRC case number and any related case numbers to the landscape and native plant preservation plans. DS 2-07.2.1.B 9) All lettering and dimensions shall be the equivalent of twelve (0.12") point or greater in size. Revise the landscape submittal to comply. DS 2-05.2.1.A 10) Residential development of four (4) or more dwelling units is allowed only as a Residential Cluster Project (RCP), except as provided in Sec. 2.8.6.3.B. that section allows only a single-family residence where all development and the residence and any accessory structures are located outside of the critical riparian habitat area within a lot. RCP's are designed to preserve to the greatest extent possible existing landscape features and amenities, such as significant topography, protected peaks and ridges, natural vegetation, and floodplains, and integrates such features with structures and other improvements. It is important to identify the Critical Habitat as well as the Protected Riparian Area on the ERR. RESUBMITTAL OF ALL PLANS IS REQUIRED |
| 12/07/2006 | ED ABRIGO | PIMA COUNTY | ASSESSOR | Approved | Office of the Pima County Assessor 115 N. Church Ave. Tucson, Arizona 85701 BILL STAPLES ASSESSOR TO: CDRC Office Subdivision Review Cityof Tucson (FAX# 791-5559) FROM: Gary Ault, Mapping Supervisor Pima County Assessor's Office Mapping Department DATE: December 6, 2006 RE: Assessor's Review and Comments Regarding Tentative Plat S06-235 WOOTTON PROPERTY T141502 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * X Plat meets Assessor's Office requirements. _______ Plat does not meet Assessor's Office requirements. COMMENTS: PLEASE MAKE THE FOLLOWING ADJUSTMENTS BY FINAL PLAT STAGE: 1. ADD BEARINGS TO ALLPARCEL LINES AND STREET-CENTERS. 2. ADD COMPLETE CURVE DATA 3. SECTION TIE NEEDS DIMS AND BEARINGS 4. REFERENCE ADJOING AREAS AS EITHER "UNSUBDIVIDED" OR WITH APPROPRIATE MAP & PLAT THANK YOU FOR YOUR SUBMITTAL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS PLEASE CALL ROSANNA WERNER AT 740-4390 NOTE: THE ASSESSOR'S CURRENT INVOLVEMENT IN PROCESSING ITS MANUAL MAPS TO DIGITAL FORMAT IS EXPEDITED GREATLY BY EXCHANGE OF DIGITAL DATA. IN THE COURSE OF RECORDING THIS SUBDIVISION YOUR ASSISTANCE IN PROVIDING THIS OFFICE WITH AN AUTOCAD COPY WOULD BE GREATLY APPRECIATED. THANK YOU FOR ANY DIGITAL DATA PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED. ROSANNA WERNER |
| 12/07/2006 | FRODRIG2 | COT NON-DSD | REAL ESTATE | Denied | S06-235 Wootton Property: Tentative Plat Review - Request replies to the following: 1. Written assurance from a title company stating that no adverse claims may be made concerning an existing paved road that apparently provides access to The Club at La Mariposa. This is a paved road that meanders within parcel 133-03-283E. 2. Per Dkt/Pg. 5855/290 & 10583/1756, an in/egress & util. easement, approx. 154.49' - 155.73' in width, is not annotated. 3. Dkt./Pg. 12752/4071, does not have a Grantor/Grantee to establish an easement. In addition, the easement corridor is off-site. 4. Request assurance that access easement to proposed Wootton Property, Lots 1-7, does not adversely effect access to parcels 133-03-3080, 133-03-3070 & 133-0-304C. 5. Per Pg. 3 of 4 & 4 of 4, confirm if a paved road is in-place, along the S. boundary of proposed plat, traversing The Club at La Mariposa to Houghton Rd. |
| 12/08/2006 | KAY MARKS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Denied | PIMA COUNTY WASTEWATER 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 KAY MARKS ADDRESSING OFFICIAL PH: 740-6480 FAX #: 740-6370 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL SUBJECT: S06-235 WOOTTON PROPERTY/TENTATIVE PLAT DATE: December 8, 2006 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and the following matters must be resolved prior to our approval: 1.) Correct Location Map scale. 2.) Delete street directions on Location Map. 3.) Change Section 30 to 36 on pg. 1. 4.) Delete all adjacent tax codes and owner information. 5.) Label approved interior street name on Final Plat. jg |
| 12/13/2006 | PGEHLEN1 | TUCSON WATER NEW AREA DEVELOPMENT | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 12/19/2006 | ROBERT YOUNG | PIMA COUNTY | PIMA CTY - DEV REVIEW | Passed | |
| 12/19/2006 | ROGER HOWLETT | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Denied | DEPARTMENT OF URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application (1st review) CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT S06-235 Wootton Property, L. 1-7 12/18/06 () Tentative Plat ( ) Development Plan () Landscape Plan/ERZ Mitigation Plan/NPPO ( ) Revised Plan/Plat ( ) Board of Adjustment ( ) Other CROSS REFERENCE: N/A; C9-97-24 denied M&C, Nov. 15, 2005 NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: Bear Canyon Neighborhood Plan GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: Houghton Rd. is Scenic Route COMMENTS DUE BY: December 8, 2006 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: ( ) No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment ( ) Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions ( ) RCP Proposal Complies With Plan Policies () See Additional Comments Attached ( ) No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: () Resubmittal Required: () Tentative Plat ( ) Development Plan () Landscape Plan ( ) Other REVIEWER: Joanne Hershenhorn 791-4505 DATE: 12/18/06 Wooton Property: Tentative Plat S06-235 Please clarify what areas are included in the subdivision. The area shown on the tentative plat (TP) pages 3/4 and 4/4 includes all of parcels 133-03-282K and 133-03-282M, and the eastern part of 133-03-283E, however, the location map on sheet 1/4 excludes 133-03-282K. All of parcel 133-03-283E must be shown on the plat. The project location map on the ERZ Mitigation/Landscape Plan (ERZ/LP) shows all of 133-03-283 and none of the other parcels. The project areas shown on the TP and ERZ/LP must be consistent. The Bear Canyon Neighborhood Plan (BCNP) requires that builders/ developers notify the Master Neighborhood Association and any affected property owner within 300 feet at least 30 days prior to submittal of plans to CDRC. The builder/developer … shall offer to review the proposed development plan … with the neighbors and/or the neighborhood association. If the required notification for the Scenic Corridor and Environmental Resource overlay zones has been completed, this requirement will have been satisfied. Regarding the ERZ/LP, please explain why the mapped FEMA floodway is outside the 100-year floodplain. Are these boundaries taken from the same study? The Office of Conservation and Sustainable Development (OCSD, 791-4675) should be included in discussions regarding potential development of these parcels. On November 7, 2006, the Mayor and Council adopted Resolution No, 20505, including a development standard (DS) for protected riparian areas. Pleased check with the Development Services Department to find out if the new DS applies to this project. |
| 12/22/2006 | FRODRIG2 | PDEQ | PIMA COUNTY DEPT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY | Denied | Comments have been faxed. If you would like more copies please contact the CDRC office of the Pima County Reviewer directly. |
| 12/28/2006 | LIZA CASTILLO | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Approved | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER CO. 4350 E. Irvington Road, Tucson, AZ 85714 Post Office Box 711, Tucson, AZ 85702 WR#173319 October 17, 2006 Urban Engineering, Inc. 877 S. Alvernon Way Tucson, AZ 85711 Dear Mr. Bueter: SUBJECT: Wootton Property Lots 1 thru 7 S06-235 Tucson Electric Power Company (TEP) has no objection to the preliminary plat submitted for November 16, 2006. The preliminary point where TEP will possibly serve this project is from Transformer LMA-15 which is within the easement according to Docket 12493 page 31and within the road Right of Way check. Enclosed is a copy of TEP's facility map showing the approximate location and unit numbers of the existing facilities. Also enclosed is a copy of the tentative plat showing where TEP will be placing the aboveground equipment for this subdivision. This is not a preliminary design. TEP has provided this drawing to show where the proposed locations are for transformers and pedestals. If the Designer feels a line extension from different and/or additional source is necessary, all costs for the extension will be borne by the Developer. Equipment Placement on this tentative is hypothetical and subject to change. We will need a request from the customer for a preliminary layout when the tentative plat has been approved by the governing agency. TEP will provide a preliminary electrical design on the Approved Tentative Plat within Fifteen (15) working days upon receipt of the plat. Additional plans necessary for preparation of the design are: building plans including water, electrical, landscape, sidewalk and paving plans. Also, submit the AutoCAD version of the plat on a CD or email to hnoriega@tep.com. Should you have any questions, please contact the Designer for this project Marcus Hayes at (520) 917-8705. Sincerely, Henrietta Noriega Office Specialist Design/Build hn Enclosures cc: P. Gehlen- City of Tucson (email) J. Wootton - letter only |