Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Plan Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Plan Number - S06-220
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 09/27/2007 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 10/01/2007 | FRODRIG2 | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Denied | October 1, 2007 To: Salvador Garcia Urban Engineering Thru: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Manager City of Tucson Development Services Department ___________________________ From: Tom Porter, Sr. CEA (520-740-6579), representing the Pima County Departments of Wastewater Management and Environment Quality Subject: Residential Cluster Project, 200 E. Yavapai Tent. Plat - 3rd Submittal S06-220 The proposed sewer collection lines for the above-referenced project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use. Obtain a letter from the PCWMD's Development Services Section, written within the past 90 days, stating that treatment and conveyance system capacity for the project is available in the downstream public sewerage system and provide a copy of that letter to this office. The required form to request such a letter may be found at: http://www.pima.gov/wwm/forms/docs/CapResponseRequest.pdf. The tentative or preliminary plat for this project cannot be approved until a copy of this letter has been received by this office. Sheet 3: The (3) terminal reaches of the sewer on-site are not 1% based on the inverts shown and they are shown as 1% in the sewer line table. Sheet 3: The rim and invert elevations for the existing public manholes must be shown on this plan. Sheet 3: The proposed manholes need to be numbered sequentially beginning with the most downstream manhole. Sheet 3: The sewer directional flow arrows are missing for both the proposed and existing sewer lines. Sheet 3: The existing public sewer lines shown on plan must be labeled with the construction plan # and pipe size. Sheet 3: The road where you are proposing to connect to the existing public sewer must be labeled. Sheet 3: You are proposing to connect to a 21” sewer line. Be aware of PCWMD’s Engineering Directive and Standard Detail regarding flow management. This office will require a revised set of bluelines, and a response letter, addressing these comments. Additional comments may be made during the review of these documents. Pima County Code Title 13.20.030.A.2 requires that a wastewater review fee be paid for each submittal of the tentative or preliminary plat. The fee for the first submittal is $166 plus $50 per sheet. For the second submittal, the review fee is $50 per sheet. For all subsequent submittals, the review fee is $39 per sheet. The next submittal of this project will be the fourth(4th) submittal. A check for the review fee of this submittal in the amount of $39.00 (made out to PIMA COUNTY TREASURER) must accompany the revised set of bluelines and response letter. If the number of sheets changes, please adjust the review fee accordingly. If you have any questions regarding the above-mentioned comments, please contact me. |
| 10/11/2007 | GLYNDA ROTHWELL | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Approved | SUBJECT: 200 E YAVAPAI Lots 1-35 S06-220 Tucson Electric Power Company (TEP) has no objection to the tentative plat submitted for review September 27, 2007. The preliminary point where TEP will serve this project is from the existing pole line along Yavapai Road proceeding through the interior of the subdivision. As you are aware, there are existing electrical facilities within the boundaries of this subdivision. All relocation costs will be billable to the developer. TEP will provide a preliminary electrical design on the Approved Tentative Plat within fifteen (15) working days upon receipt of the plat. Additional plans necessary for preparation of the design are: building plans including water, electrical, landscape, sidewalk and paving plans. Also, submit the AutoCAD version of the plat on a CD or email to lcastillo@tep.com <mailto:lcastillo@tep.com> . Should you have any questions, please contact me at (520) 917-8745. Liza Castillo, Right of Way Agent Tucson Electric Power Co. Unisource Energy Services offc-(520) 917-8745 fax-(520) 545-1416 lcastillo@tep.com |
| 10/12/2007 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 10/17/2007 | KAY MARKS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Approv-Cond | 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 KAY MARKS ADDRESSING OFFICIAL PH: 740-6480 FAX #: 740-6370 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL SUBJECT: S06-220 200 E YAVAPAI /REVISED TENTATIVE PLAT DATE: October 17, 2007 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and we hereby approve this project. ON FINAL PLAT 1.) CORRECT DESCRIPTION ON TOP OF PAGE 1. ***The Pima County Addressing Section can use digital CAD drawing files when submitted with your final plat Mylar. These CAD files can be submitted through Pima County Addressing. The digital CAD drawing files expedite the addressing and permitting processes when we are able to insert this digital data into the County’s Geographic Information System. Your support is greatly appreciated.*** jg |
| 10/19/2007 | ANDY VERA | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Approved | Provisions met for APC curbside refuse and recycle collection. Cul-de-sac lots will bring APC's out to designated collection points due to substandard cul-de-sac design. |
| 10/19/2007 | FRODRIG2 | COT NON-DSD | REAL ESTATE | Approved | >>> Andy Steuart 10/18/2007 11:10 AM >>> S06-220 200 E. Yavapai: Resubmittal - CDRC - Tentative Plat Review - No comment. |
| 10/26/2007 | HEATHER THRALL | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Heather Thrall Senior Planner PROJECT: S06-220 200 E. Yavapai, Residential Cluster Project Subdivision Tentative Plat, 3rd review TRANSMITTAL DATE: November 2, 2007 DUE DATE: October 25, 2007 COMMENTS: 1) THIS PLAT HAS EXPIRED AND AN EXTENSION IS REQUIRED TO PROCEED. It should also be noted, in November of 2006, Mayor and Council adopted an ordinance that requires any RCP proposal under 5 acres of overall area to go through a Special Exception approval process. The project would thus require a resubmittal, with revisions meeting current RCP code requirements, and with a Special Exception application, if an extension cannot be granted. Contact CDRC Manager Patricia Gehlen, 520-837-4919, to inquire into a possible extension. 2) (per last 2 reviews) Per DS 2-03.2.4.G, a Development Standard Modification Request (DSMR) is required to allow the parking areas tied in with the street as proposed - both due to maneuvering from a parking space directly into a street and because a Development Standards cross-section does not exist for such a design. It's the maneuvering of a parking space into a street that requires a DSMR. Please apply for one through the CDRC division of Development Services, 520-837-4918, Ferne Rodriguez. Your response to the last review indicates you were told in a phone conversation that a DSMR could be applied for under a FINAL PLAT review, that is not correct. A DSMR is required to be approved before the tentative plat can be approved. 3. (per last reviews) Per LUC 3.6.1.4.D.1, on sheet 1 of the RCP plat page, in the Building Setbacks section, at the section describing the REAR SETBACK: please correct note exactly read "the minimum setback required for buildings along the east, west and south subdivision perimeter is the greater of 10 feet or ¾ (three-quarters) the height of the exterior building wall." (I see this shown on typical detail drawing thank you.) 4. (Per last review) Per DS 2-10.3.2.D.1, as several lots are under 4000 s.f., I see you provided an elevation and floor plan of the proposed residence. Please have the elevations and the foot prints labeled to show the building walls and the roof overhangs - ensure the roof overhangs also are within the 3' minimum required setback for interior lot lines. To verify setbacks and roof overhangs, please dimension all wall heights from grade to the top of the wall - and dimension overhangs from wall. Please be advised, it appears that the 2 story units could have setback problems to the subdivision boundary - depending upon length of lot and length of house. Just dimension everything on the elevation plans. PER THIS REVIEW - Roof Overhangs - Per the LUC, you are permitted to have a roof overhang 2' into the required building setback area, even in an RCP - this is a clarification to correct the above comment made on the last review that we discussed in our phone meeting. Be sure, however, to consult our building code division to see if any fire rating is required. BUILDING SETBACKS ARE AN ISSUE: Looking at the dimensioned floor plans of both the two and single story homes provided on sheet 5, it appears these buildings are not going to fit on several lots. For example, lots 17 and 23 are not wide enough to accommodate the required minimum building setback at their south subdivision/property boundary lines. Recall, that setback is the greater of 10' or ¾ of the height of the exterior building wall. In addition - the single story plan shows a house width wider than these lots. You're looking at an 18' wide buildable pad on lots 17 and 23 - that's not possible given these floor plans proposed on sheet 5. In addition, look at lots 14 and 28 and examine the setbacks required versus the lengths of either model proposed. In addition, the 2nd story model shows a porch that does not appear to fit as an option and still meet any building setbacks within the subdivision. Floor plans should be labeled clearly to show any optional features as well - and dimensioned options, such as porches. Provide a building footprint into each lot showing how it will work - and provide a list of each lot with the style of unit proposed on it. If there are further floor plans that you are proposing, please provide them on another sheet. 5. On the elevations, please provide dimensions for all wall heights for the residence - in the front along the face of the garage - and provide an overall roof height as well, and a roof height from the midpoint of the pitch of the roof. 6. Depending upon responses provided, further review comments may be forthcoming. Should you have any questions, I can be reached at Heather.Thrall@tucsonaz.gov or at 520-837-4951. C:\planning\cdrc\tentativeplat\S06-220 yavapai rcp 3 review.doc RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised tentative plat |
| 10/26/2007 | ROGER HOWLETT | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Approved | DEPARTMENT OF URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT S06-220 200 E. Yavapai 10/25/07 (XXXX) Tentative Plat () Development Plan (XXXX) Landscape Plan () Revised Plan/Plat () Board of Adjustment () Other CROSS REFERENCE: NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: Craigin-Keeling GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: COMMENTS DUE BY: 10/25/07 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: () No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment () Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions () RCP Proposal Complies With Plan Policies () See Additional Comments Attached (XXXX) No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: 03/23/07 () Resubmittal Required: () Tentative Plat () Development Plan () Landscape Plan () Other – REVIEWER: drcorral 791-4505 DATE: 10/24/07 |
| 11/02/2007 | PATRICIA GILBERT | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Needs Review | |
| 11/05/2007 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES November 5, 2007 Salvador Garcia P.E. Urban Engineering 877 S. Alvernon Way Tucson, Arizona 85711 Subject: S06-220 200 East Yavapai Tentative Plat Dear Salvador: Your submittal of September 27, 2007 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a DETAILED cover letter explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLACKLINES MUST BE FOLDED 4 Copies Revised Tentative Plat (Engineering, Zoning, Wastewater, DSD) 3 Copies Revised Landscape Plan (Engineering, Zoning, DSD) 2 Copies Color Elevations, floor plans, and photo's (Zoning, DSD) 2 Copies Revised Drainage Report (Engineering, DSD) THE REVIEW PERIOD FOR THIS TENTATIVE PLAT HAS EXPIRED AND MAY NOT BE EXTENDED UNTIL THIS PLAT HAS COMPLETED THE SPECIAL EXCEPTION PROCESS PER LUC 3.6.1.2.C. Should you have any questions, please call me at 837-4919. Sincerely, Patricia Gehlen CDRC Manager All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: 318-3808 |
| 11/05/2007 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | April 29, 2008 Salvador Garcia P.E. Urban Engineering 877 South Alvernon Way Tucson, AZ 85711 SUBJECT: CLOSURE OF CDRC FILES Tentative and Final Plat Per Section 4.1.7.1, Maximum Review Period The subdivider has one (1) year from the date of tentative plat submittal to obtain approval of the plans. Failure to obtain approval means the review period has expired Case # Case Name DSD Transmittal Date S06-220 200 East Yavapai October 26, 2006 Please note that this case has been closed and that, in order to continue review of the project, new development plan/tentative plat applications are required which comply with regulations in effect at the time of the new submittals. Thank you for your assistance. Sincerely, Patricia Y. Gehlen CDRC Manager xc: CDRC file S06-220 |