Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Plan Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Plan Number - S06-208
Review Name: TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10/02/2006 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 10/06/2006 | FRODRIG2 | OTHER AGENCIES | PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS | Approved | Transportation Information for Rezoning, Subdivision, and Development Requests Delivered to: Date Delivered: Development Services - City of Tucson 10/6/2006 Case Number Project Name Average number of daily trips (ADT) forecasted as a result of the proposed development This information is provided for jurisdictional planning departments to assess the impact of the proposed residential or commercial development on surrounding traffic patterns and roads. If the forecasted daily traffic exceeds 500 average daily trips, a more detailed analysis is also provided. S06-208 201 Red Colt Ranch Subdivision Pima Association of Governments Sandra C. Holland, Data Services 177 N. Church Ave., Suite 405, Tucson, Arizona 85701-1127 (520) 792-1093 FAX (520) 620-6981 |
| 10/06/2006 | JCLARK3 | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Approved | * no known landfill within 1000 feet of this development. * All 21 lots have curbside frontage. Automated Plastic Containers (APC) are approved for this development. |
| 10/10/2006 | KAROL ARAGONEZ | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Karol Aragonez Planner PROJECT: S06-208 Red Colt Ranch Subdivisions Tentative Plat TRANSMITTAL DATE: October 9, 2006 DUE DATE: October 30, 2006 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. Section 4.1.7.1, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a tentative plat. If, at the end of that time, the tentative plat has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this tentative plat is October 29, 2007. 2. Within the location map please label the Hidden Hills Wash and Estes Wash, Kenyon Drive, and 29th Street. DS 2-03.2.1.D.2 3. Remove "Book___, Page____" reference from the title block and provide a brief current legal description of the property. Also define what each common area is, ie. Common Area "A" Landscape Buffers. DS 2-03.2.1.G.3 4. Please add the contour interval under the north arrow on sheet 2 of 2. DS 2-03.2.1.H 5. Case number S06-208 has been assigned to this tentative plat (TP). Please place this number in the right corner of all sheets of the TP, landscape plan, NPPO, and any other associated sheets. DS 2-03.2.2.B.1 6. Please add to zoning and land use note 4 that the use is subject to Land Use Code (LUC) Sec. 3.6.1, Sec. 3.5.7.1.E and F. LUC 2.3.4.2.A.3 7. Please revise streets and roads note 2 to indicate the total number of miles of new public streets being created by this plat. DS 2-03.2.2.D.1.b 8. Please draw all existing easements on the plan along with recordation information, location, width, and purpose. If an easement is no longer in use and scheduled to be vacated or has been abandoned, so indicate. If none exist provide response to reviewer's comments. Also if easements are purposed please draw, dimension and label as to their purpose and whether they will be public or private. If none exist provide response to reviewer's comments. DS 2-03.2.3.C & J 9. Please dimension the existing pavement, curb, and sidewalks within Bonanza Avenue. Dimension the existing sidewalks within 22nd Street. Clearly label the recordation information for both streets. DS 2-03.2.3.D 10. Provide the square footage of Common Area "A" and "B" on the tentative plat. DS 2-03.2.4.B 11. Please revise street cross section C-C to dimension the required eight (8) foot parking lane (6 foot pavement, 2 foot wedge curb) and ten (10) foot travel lanes as per DS 3-01.10.0 Figure 2. Also dimension the half (0.5) foot space between the sidewalk and property line. DS 3-01.10.0 Figure 2 12. It appears that the property is within the intersection widening section, more specific the taper section. For Bonanza Avenue the taper has half R/W of forty-five (45) feet in width for a length of three hundred (300) feet measured from the centerline of 22nd Street, then tapers for two hundred (200) feet to meet the future half R/W of thirty-two (32) feet. Please verify street cross-section A-A is dimensioned correctly. Per the MS&R Plan the proposed street cross section should consist of a nine (9) foot wide pedestrian and utility area, a seventeen (17) foot travel lane, and a twelve (12) foot turn lane. Improvements within 22nd Street should be constructed as required by the MS&R Plan for a one hundred and fifty (150) foot proposed right-of-way. The required half proposed cross-section consists of twelve (12) foot pedestrian and utility area, a seventeen (17) foot bus and carpool lane, three (3) twelve (12) foot travel lanes, and a ten (10) foot half median. Revise section B-B as required. Please verify these requirements with Traffic Engineering and TDOT. DS 2-03.2.4.F, DS 2-03.2.4.H, and MS&R Plan 13. Please relabel the seventy-five (75) foot right-of-way to half right-of-way and proposed half right-of-way within 22nd Street. Relabel the proposed half right-of-way of Bonanza Avenue from thirty-one (31) feet to thirty-two (32) feet. (see comment 12) 14. Please label all zoning classifications of surrounding adjacent to the property including across rights-of-way. North and East R-1, west across Bonanza Avenue O-3, and South across 22nd Street RX-2. DS 2-03.2.4.D 15. Please show and dimension the perimeter yard setback line on the tentative plat. Perimeter yard widths are based on a minimum distance as listed in the LUC or on the height of the exterior walls of the proposed units, whichever provides a greater setback. It is recommended that the tallest units be used to determine the setback line. DS 2-10.3.1.A 16. Please provide typical plot plan layouts for a corner, an interior lot, and a lot affected by the perimeter yard setback. These typicals are to be fully dimensioned and are to be drawn at a larger scale than the tentative plat. The typicals should reflect the largest unit offered to assure code compliance. DS 2-10.3.1.B 17. Please provide the breakdown for the site coverage calculation to allow staff the ability to verify. Site coverage includes all square footage of structures, vehicle use areas, and storage area as defined by LUC Sec. 3.2.9 DS 2-10.3.1.C, LUC 3.6.1.4.B, and LUC 3.2.9 18. Please provide a detail as to how barrier-free accessibility is accomplished. As applied, barrier-free accessibility is defined as access from a street and/or parking space to the front door of a unit. DS 2-10.3.1.D 19. This proposed subdivision is located within the Pantano East Area Plan. Please address requirements as stated in DS 2-10.3.2. The Department of Urban Planning and Design (DUPD) will review for compatibility of project to adopted plan DS 2-10.3.2 20. Please indicate how compliance of how mechanical equipment is to be screened from adjacent streets exterior to the project site and from adjacent existing residential development is achieved. If ground mounted and screened by property walls please provide note stating that. If roof mounted provide a detail showing how screening will be architecturally integrated with the overall design of the RCP. LUC 3.6.1.4.A.9 21. Please add note stating "There shall be no further division of land or resubdivision without the developer or successor in interest furnishing written notice to all property owners or record within the boundaries of the RCP. In no event shall further division of land occur without the written approval of the Mayor and Council". LUC 3.6.1.4.A.10 22. Please clarify landscape open area north and east of Common Area "B" as part of Bk. 43, Pg. 18 Sunset Cove Subdivision. 23. Please provide a separate response letter detailing compliance with rezoning conditions. 24. Please provide as required by rezoning condition 11 passive recreational facilities, including at least one shaded bench, in or near the detention basin with pedestrian access provided to it which is constructed of all-weather material that meets minimum ADA requirements. C9-06-19 Condition 11 25. Please provide two (2) wall details. A separate detail is required depicting those requirements of rezoning condition 12, 14 and 15. C9-06-19 Condition 12, 14, and 15 26. Please provide as a note providing the actual height of the proposed residences. This is required to verify setback requirements. 27. The street perimeter yard as provided in Land Use Code Calculations will be used for interior streets. In addition, please note and show the perimeter yard setbacks as required for setbacks from MS&R streets (greater of 21 feet or height measured from future curb location). Because lots 1 and 11-21 have common areas between the lot line and MS&R right-of-way the setback will either be three (3) feet (interior setback) or the street perimeter setback (MS&R) whichever provides the greatest setback. 28. Please provide a detail for accessible curb ramps. Curb ramps shall be a minimum of three (3) feet in width, exclusive of flared sides. The curb ramp flares shall not be steeper than 1:10. Counter slopes of adjoining gutters and road surfaces immediately adjacent to the curb ramp shall not be steeper than 1:20. The adjacent surfaces at transitions at curb ramps to walks, gutters and streets shall be at the same level. ANSI 406.2, 3, & 4 All accessible curb ramps shall have truncated domes installed that shall be twenty-four (24) inches minimum in the direction of travel and extend the full width of the curb ramp or flush surface. The domes shall be located so the edge nearest the curb line is six (6) inches to eight (8) inches from the curb line. ANSI 406.12, ANSI 705 If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Karol Aragonez, (520) 791-5550, ext. 1197. KAA S:\zoning review\karol\planning\cdrc\tentativeplat\S06-208tp.doc RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised tentative plat, CC&R's and additional requested documents. |
| 10/16/2006 | JOSE ORTIZ | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Approv-Cond | October 16, 2006 ACTIVITY NUMBER: S06-208 PROJECT NAME: Red Colt Ranch PROJECT ADDRESS: 9941 E 22nd St PROJECT REVIEWER: Jose E. Ortiz PE, Traffic Engineer Resubmittal Required: Traffic Engineering recommends a conditional approval of the Tentative Plat; the following items must be considered or added to the plat. 1. A private improvement agreement (PIA) will be necessary for the proposed work to be performed within the Right-of-way. An approved tentative plat is required prior to applying for a PIA. Contact the PIA Coordinator for additional PIA information at 791-5550 ext. 1107. 2. The access points shall have 25' radius curb returns. (DS 3-01.0 figure 6) Call out the 25' curb returns at Red Colt Road/S. Bonanza Avenue and S. Bonanza Avenue/22nd Street. 3. Ensure that Condition number 4 has been met with respect to the north half of 22nd Street improvements. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-4259 x305 or Jose.Ortiz@tucsonaz.gov |
| 10/16/2006 | JIM EGAN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | |
| 10/23/2006 | TOM MARTINEZ | OTHER AGENCIES | AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION | Approved | NO COMMENT S06-208 INDEVCO A&E, INC RED COLT RANCH SUBDIVISION -------------------------------------------------------- Confidentiality and Nondisclosure Notice: This email transmission and any attachments are intended for use by the person(s)/entity(ies) named above and may contain confidential/privileged information. Any unauthorized use, disclosure or distribution is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by e-mail, and delete or destroy all copies plus attachments. |
| 10/25/2006 | KAY MARKS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Denied | 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 KAY MARKS ADDRESSING OFFICIAL PH: 740-6480 FAX #: 740-6370 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL SUBJECT: S06-208 RED COLT RANCH SUBDIVISION/TENTATIVE PLAT DATE: October 25, 2006 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and the following matters must be resolved prior to our approval: Correct 46-05 to 48-05 in Location Map. Correct Tiffany Place 35-40 to Mesquite Trails 53-38 in Location Map. Delete direction from street names in Location Map and sheet 2. Correct Old Spanish Trl to Old Spanish Tr in Location Map. Delete reference to Book and Page in Title Block. jg |
| 10/30/2006 | GLENN HICKS | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Approved | DATE: October 27, 2006 TO: Ferne Rodriguez, Development Services FROM: Glenn Hicks Parks and Recreation 791-4873 ext. 215 Glenn.Hicks@tucsonaz.gov CC: SUBJECT: S06-208 Red Colt Ranch Subdivision: Tentative Plat Review(10-2-06) Staff has no comments. |
| 10/31/2006 | ROGER HOWLETT | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Denied | DEPARTMENT OF URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT S06-208 Red Colt Ranch Subdivision () Tentative Plat ( ) Development Plan () Landscape Plan ( ) Revised Plan/Plat ( ) Board of Adjustment () Other – color front elevations, design information CROSS REFERENCE: C9-06-19 NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: Pantano East Area Plan & General Plan GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: N/A COMMENTS DUE BY: October 30, 2006 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: ( ) No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment ( ) Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions ( ) RCP Proposal Complies With Plan Policies () See Comments Attached ( ) No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: () Resubmittal Required: () Tentative Plat ( ) Development Plan () Landscape Plan () Other – color photographs, compatibility discussion, color elevations (side and rear) REVIEWER: J. Hershenhorn, 791-4505 DATE: 10/30/2006 Red Colt Ranch S06-208 Please place a note on sheet TP-2 indicating that all residences will be single-story, to demonstrate compliance with rezoning condition #6. Staff’s recollection is that exterior wall and roof tile colors of the surrounding developments are very light in tone. To demonstrate compliance with rezoning conditions #7 and 8, please submit color photographs of the surrounding residential development, so that the color elevations proposed for homes at Red Colt Ranch may be compared. Please provide a brief discussion of how the proposed colors will be compatible with the colors in the surrounding development. Thank you for providing the supplemental information, including color front elevations. To demonstrate compliance with rezoning conditions # 9 and 10, for units that will be visible from 22nd Street or Bonanza Avenue, please provide color side and/or rear elevations showing that the architectural detail on the rear and side facades is similar to that on the front façade. To demonstrate compliance with rezoning condition # 11, please indicate on the plat and landscape plan that a) there will be passive recreation facilities, including at least one bench, in the interior of the detention basin in the northwest corner of the site, and b) safe pedestrian access to/from the basin will be provided (provide a detail of the access). On the LP, regarding Note #6, please indicate that one 15-gallon native canopy tree will be planted on every other lot, within 10 feet of the front property lines, to demonstrate compliance with rezoning condition 13. To demonstrate compliance with conditions # 12, 14 and 1 5, please clearly indicate, on the plat and landscape plan, all screen walls that will be constructed. Please provide detail wall sections and identify the construction and decorative materials. If any screen walls are proposed around the basin, please indicate that they will be “view walls” and provide “view wall” details. Please indicate that all walls will be constructed of or painted with graffiti-resistant materials. |
| 11/01/2006 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1) Please clarify landscape open area north and east of Common Area "B" as part of Bk. 43, Pg. 18 Sunset Cove Subdivision on the landscape and NPP plans. 2) Revise the landscape plan and the tentaive plat to use the common area designators. 3) Provide the ground coverage estimate for each plant species used to meet the street landscape border requirements. LUC 3.7.2.4 The plants proposed on the plans may not provide sufficient coverage. 4) Show required recreation facilities on the landscape plan. DS 2-07.2.2.D 5) Revise the landscape plans to show the trees required for every other lot per condition of rezoning. C9-06-19 6) Revise the landscape and NPP plans to show limits of grading. DS 2-07 Resubmittal of all plans is required. |
| 11/01/2006 | FRODRIG2 | COT NON-DSD | REAL ESTATE | Denied | S06-208 Red Colt Ranch Subdivision: Tentative Plat Review - Two items: 1. Sht. 2 of 2, change "70.00' existing R/W" to "100.00' existing R/W" S. of Ponderosa Subdivision. 2. Total linear distance of public road is not annotated under "Streets and Roads Notes." |
| 11/02/2006 | ED ABRIGO | PIMA COUNTY | ASSESSOR | Approved | Office of the Pima County Assessor 115 N. Church Ave. Tucson, Arizona 85701 BILL STAPLES ASSESSOR TO: CDRC Office Subdivision Review City of Tucson (FAX# 791-5559) FROM: Gary Ault, Mapping Supervisor Pima County Assessor's Office Mapping Department DATE: November 1, 2006 RE: Assessor's Review and Comments Regarding Tentative Plat S06-208 RED COLT RANCH T141514 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * X Plat meets Assessor's Office requirements. _______ Plat does not meet Assessor's Office requirements. COMMENTS: PLEASE MAKE THE FOLLOWING ADJUSTMENTS BY FINAL PLAT STAGE: 1. ADD DIMS AND BEARINGS FOR STREET-CENTERS 2. ADD RECORDING INFO FOR EXISTING STREETS. THANK YOU FOR YOUR SUBMITTAL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS PLEASE CALL ROSANNA WERNER AT 740-4390 NOTE: THE ASSESSOR'S CURRENT INVOLVEMENT IN PROCESSING ITS MANUAL MAPS TO DIGITAL FORMAT IS EXPEDITED GREATLY BY EXCHANGE OF DIGITAL DATA. IN THE COURSE OF RECORDING THIS SUBDIVISION YOUR ASSISTANCE IN PROVIDING THIS OFFICE WITH AN AUTOCAD COPY WOULD BE GREATLY APPRECIATED. THANK YOU FOR ANY DIGITAL DATA PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED. ROSANNA WERNER |
| 11/02/2006 | PGEHLEN1 | TUCSON WATER NEW AREA DEVELOPMENT | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 11/14/2006 | PAUL MACHADO | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | To: Patricia Gehlen DATE: November 14, 2006 CDRC/Zoning Manager SUBJECT: Red Colt Ranch, 9941 E 22nd Street Tentative Plat S06-208 (First Review) T14S, R15E, Section 14 RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Tentative Plat and Drainage Report. The Tentative Plat (TP) and Drainage Report (DR) cannot be approved as submitted. Please address the following review comments prior to the next submittal. Tentative Plat: 1. Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the TP. 2. As per the Federal ADA requirements, all wheel chair ramps shall have the truncated domes instead of the standard grooves that are shown on COT SD 207. Aside from the Truncated Domes, all wheel chair ramps shall be constructed in accordance with COT SD 207. 3. Please re-label all common areas that may be used in a dual and/or single use capacity per D.S. 2-03.6.4.C. For example, a Ret./Det. Basin may also be used as a recreation facility or only as a drainage facility or drainage channel and this must be reflected on the Final Plat. A key note explaining the labels could be used in conjunction with the labels, ie.: Common Area "A" - Streets Common Area "B" - Drainage/Recreation Facilities Common Area "C" - Recreation Facilities Common Area "D" - Drainage Facilities Common Area "E" - Landscaping 4. Please list estimated cut & fill quantities per D.S. 2-02.2.1.17. 5. Add the basin(s) maintenance responsibility note per S.M.D.D.F.M. 2.3.1.6 C 1 and 2 to the TP. 6. Dimension from street monument lines to existing and proposed curbs, sidewalks, driveways, and utility lines per D.S. 2-02.2.1.21. 7. Show Tentative plat number (S06-208) on all sheets per D.S. 2-02.2.1.29. 8. Placement of fill in excess of 2' above existing grade at any location in the outer 100' of the developing site is not allowed and/or shall meet the requirements per D.S. 11-01. Please address. 9. A permit or a private improvement agreement will be necessary for any work performed within the Right-of-way. Contact Permits and Codes at (520) 791-5100 for permit information. 10. Please show a typical cross section of the P.A.A.L. or call out the percentage of slopes. Call out the GB at the D/W, if applicable. 11. Please show the proposed roof drainage patterns, 100% of the 10-year flow must be conveyed under the sidewalks including any other site drainage as well. Please provide supporting calculations to demonstrate compliance with D.S. 3-01.4.4. If the location(s) of the roof scuppers have not yet been decided, a general note indicating sidewalk scuppers will be used when the roof scuppers locations have been designed and located will suffice. 12. Add note: "Depress all landscaped areas 6" maximum for water harvesting". 13. "A grading permit and Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plans (SWPPP's) will be required for this project. Submit 4 sets of grading and SWPPP's with text, upon completion and submittal of a grading permit application. A grading permit may not be issued prior to site plan approval. Subsequent comments may be necessary, depending upon the nature and extent of revisions that occur to the plans". Drainage Report: 1. Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the DR. 2. This review was performed for Tentative Plat purposes only. 3. Provide Hydrologic Data Sheets for each significant point of drainage concentration per S.M.D.D.F.M chap. 2.3.1.3. B.3. 4. Provide cross-section, plan view and details of the retention basin and all drainage structures. 5. Grade the retention basin to drain to the outlet area. Basin bottoms shall not be designed flat. 6. If applicable, add the basin(s) maintenance responsibility note and checklist per S.M.D.D.F.M. 2.3.1.6 C 1 and 2 to the DR. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-5550 x1193 or Paul.Machado@ci.tucsonaz.govs Paul P. Machado Senior Engineering Associate City of Tucson/Development Services Department 201 N. Stone Avenue P.O. Box 27210 Tucson, Arizona 85726-7210 (520) 791-5550 x1193 office (520) 879-8010 fax C:/ 9941 E 22nd St. CDRC |
| 11/22/2006 | MARILYN KALTHOFF | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Denied | November 22, 2006 To: J. Lorenzo Ortiz, Indevco A & E, Inc Thru: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Project Manager City of Tucson Development Services Department ____________________________________ From: Michael J. Harrington (520-740-6579), representing the Pima County Departments of Wastewater Management and Environmental Quality Subject: Red Colt Ranch Lots 1 through 21, and Common Areas "A" & "B" Tentative Plat - 1st Submittal S06-208 The proposed sewer collection lines for the above-referenced project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use. 1. This project will be tributary to the Ina Road Water Pollution Control Facility via the Tanque Verde Intercetor. Obtain a letter from the PCWMD's Development Services Section, written within the past 90 days, stating that treatment and conveyance system capacity for the project is available in the downstream public sewerage system and provide a copy of that letter to this office. The required form to request such a letter may be found at: http://www.pima.gov/wwm/forms/docs/CapResponseRequest.pdf. The tentative or preliminary plat for this project cannot be approved until a copy of this letter has been received by this office. 2. All Sheets: Add the subdivision case number, S06-208, to the title block of each sheet. This number should be shown larger or bolder than any cross reference numbers. No wastewater review fees will be charged for sheets where this is the only required revision. 3. Sheet 1: Revise General Notes, Wastewater Management Notes, #1, so that it states: THE ON-SITE SANITARY SEWAGE COLLECTION LINES WILL BE PUBLIC AND DESIGNED AND CONSTRUCTED TO PIMA COUNTY WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT STANDARDS AND MUST BE ACCEPTED AND RELEASED FOR SERVICE BY THE PIMA COUNTY WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF SEWER CONNECTION PERMITS. 4. Sheet 1: In the Legend block a symbol and label are provided for proposed sanitary sewer cleanout. There are no sanitary sewer cleanouts used on this project. Delete the unused elements from the Legend. 5. Sheet 2: Number the proposed manholes as 1 and 2. 6. Sheet 2: Revise the invert elevations, at the first manhole, so that: They provide the required fall for a 90 degree change in flow, and sewage does not back up in this new public sewer system manhole. 7. Sheet 2: Revise the invert elevations at the terminal manhole so that: The PCWMD design standard 1.0% minimum slope requirement is provided. 8. Sheet 2: Pipe data is not shown for the two reaches of proposed public sewer as called for in the tentative plat requirements. Revise the site plan to show: Flow arrows, pipe material, length, diameter and percent slope of the proposed public sewer. 9. Sheet 2: Revise Section C-C, so that it shows: The underground water and sewer elements with the crosscut section view. 10. This office will require a revised set of bluelines, and a response letter, addressing these comments. Additional comments may be made during the review of these documents. Pima County Code Title 13.20.030.A.2 requires that a wastewater review fee be paid for each submittal of the tentative or preliminary plat. The fee for the first submittal is $166 plus $50 per sheet. For the second submittal, the review fee is $50 per sheet. For all subsequent submittals, the review fee is $39 per sheet. The next submittal of this project will be the second (2nd) submittal. A check for the review fee of this submittal in the amount of $100.00 (made out to PIMA COUNTY TREASURER) must accompany the revised set of bluelines and response letter. If the number of sheets changes, please adjust the review fee accordingly. If you have any questions regarding the above mentioned comments, please contact me at the telephone number shown under my signature on the first page of this letter CC: Project File |
| 11/24/2006 | LIZA CASTILLO | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Denied | SUBJECT: Red Colt Ranch Lots 1 thru 21 S06-208 Tucson Electric Power Company (TEP) has reviewed the tentative plat dated October 6, 2006. This Company is unable to approve the plat at this time. There are conflicts with the existing electrical facilities within the boundaries of the development. The facilities along with the easement recording information must be shown on the plat prior to approval. You need to show the existing service on the plat. There are no easements and a letter is required from the customer to remove existing service. The feeds for this project will possibly be from Unit #15 and also pole #31 - Road Right of Way. Please direct questions concerning easement's) to Liza Castillo, Right-of-Way Agent in our Land Department at 520-917-8745. TEP will provide a preliminary electrical design on the Approved Tentative Plat within fifteen (15) working days upon receipt of the plat. Additional plans necessary for preparation of the design are: building plans including water, electrical, landscape, sidewalk and paving plans. Should you have any questions, please contact Ron Grant at (520) 917-8712. Sincerely, Henrietta Noriega Office Specialist Design/Build hn enclosures cc: P. Gehlen - Emailed City of Tucson P. Whitthorne- Letter only R. Grant- Designer |
| 11/24/2006 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES November 24, 2006 J. Lorenzo Ortiz Indevco A & E, Inc. 5995 East Grant Road #111 Tucson, Arizona 85712 Subject: S06-208 Red Colt Ranch SubdivisionTentative Plat Dear Mr. Ortiz: Your submittal of October 2, 2006 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a DETAILED cover letter explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLACKLINES MUST BE FOLDED 10 Copies Revised Tentative Plat (Zoning, Traffic, Addressing, DUPD, Real Estate, Landscape, Engineering, Wastewater, TEP, DSD) 5 Copies Revised Landscape Plan (Zoning, DUPD, Landscape, Engineering, DSD) 2 Copies Revised NPPO Plan (Landscape, DSD) 2 Copies Color Elevations and photographs(DUPD, DSD) 2 Copies Revised Drainage Report (Engineering, DSD) Should you have any questions, please call me at 791-5608 extension 1179. Sincerely, Patricia Gehlen CDRC Manager All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: 545-0092 |