Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Plan Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Plan Number - S06-204
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 02/01/2007 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 02/16/2007 | KAY MARKS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Denied | 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 KAY MARKS ADDRESSING OFFICIAL PH: 740-6480 FAX #: 740-6370 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL SUBJECT: S06-204 PAVILIONS/REVISED TENTATIVE PLAT DATE: February 16, 2007 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and the following matters must be resolved prior to our approval: There is no labeled access to Lot 1 or Lot 17. Please clarify and show access. jg |
| 02/21/2007 | KAROL ARAGONEZ | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Karol Aragonez Planner PROJECT: S06-204 Pavilions Tentative Plat TRANSMITTAL DATE: February 21, 2007 DUE DATE: March 2, 2007 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. A cross access agreement between lots 6 and 7 is required and must be provided to CDRC prior to tentative plat approval. 2. Please add note to landscape/irrigation plan with exact wording as follows: "Landscape irrigation in the common areas, rights-of-way and some residential areas will be accomplished with reclaimed water". Civano Master PAD Sec. C-8 If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Karol Aragonez, (520) 791-5550, ext. 1197. KAA S:\zoning review\karol\planning\cdrc\tentativeplat\S06-204tpr.doc RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised tentative plat and other documents. |
| 02/23/2007 | MARILYN KALTHOFF | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Denied | PIMA COUNTY WASTEWATER February 23, 2007 To: Robert Suarez, RS Engineering Thru: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Project Manager City of Tucson Development Services Department ____________________________________ From: Michael J.Harrington (520-740-6579), representing the Pima County Departments of Wastewater Management and Environmental Quality Subject: Pavilions, Lots 1-17 Tentative Plat - 2nd Submittal S06-204 The proposed sewer collection lines for the above-referenced project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use. 1. Obtain a letter from the PCWMD's Development Services Section, written within the past 90 days, stating that treatment and conveyance system capacity for the project is available in the downstream public sewerage system and provide a copy of that letter to this office. It is our understanding that the letter has been requested but calculations and flow data have not been provided to PCWMD Development Services. Contact Mr. Kurt Stemm, regarding this matter, at 740-6607. The tentative or preliminary plat for this project will not be approved until a copy of this letter has been received by this office. This is the second request. 2. All other issues have been addressed and the tentative plat for this block plat will be approved once the capacity letter is in our file. If you have any questions regarding the above mentioned comments, please contact me at the telephone number shown under my signature on the first page of this letter CC: Project File |
| 02/26/2007 | AVERA1 | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | * Approved under the conditions that provisions for refuse collection will be submitted for each parcel per development standards. |
| 02/27/2007 | JOSE ORTIZ | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Approved | |
| 03/01/2007 | GLYNDA ROTHWELL | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Denied | 4350 E. Irvington Road, Tucson, AZ 85714 Post Office Box 711, Tucson, AZ 85702 WR# 170801 February 28, 2007 RS Engineering 140 N Tucson Blvd. Tucson, AZ 85716 Dear : Robert Suarez SUBJECT: Pavilions (Resubmittal) S06-204 Tucson Electric Power Company has reviewed and disapproved the development plan submitted February 5, 2007. It appears that there are conflicts with the existing facilities within the boundaries of this proposed development. Please show facilities on the plan. There is a 138kv OH line located parallel to Drexel Rd. (Southside). There is an UG line located parallel to Drexel Rd that is not indicated on the plan. Please see attached maps, a facilities map is attached for reference. Any relocation costs will be billable to the customer. Enclosed is a copy of a TEP facilities map showing the approximate location of the existing facilities. In order to apply for electric service, call the New Construction Department at (520) 918-8300. Submit a final set of plans including approved site, offsite and electrical load plans. Include a CD with the AutoCAD version of the plans. If easements are required, they will be secured by separate instrument. Your final plans should be sent to: Tucson Electric Power Company Attn: Ms. Mary Boice New Business Project Manager P. O. Box 711 (DB-101) Tucson, AZ 85702 520-917-8732 Please call the area Designer Todd Stocksdale at (520) 917-8715, should you have any questions. Sincerely, Henrietta Noriega Office Specialist Design/Build hn Enclosures cc: T. Stocksdale-TEP P. Gehlen, City of Tucson (E-Mail) |
| 03/01/2007 | FRODRIG2 | COT NON-DSD | REAL ESTATE | Denied | S06-204 Pavillions: Resubmittal - CDRC - Tentative Plat Review - Request the following annotations on Sht. 2 of 3 be reflected on final plat: -Remove annotation " State Lease #3457" along Houghton Rd. St. Land Lease #3457 does not apply to Houghton Rd. & this annotation is in error as annotated on M&P Bk. 50 Pg. 36. Book & Page 4595/44 is correct. -Concerning Note 2, Dkt./Pg. 11764/888 & 11879/1762 do not reflect the correct easement along Drexel. Request review & validation of instruments dedicating easements. -If the intent is to abandon the State Leases for Drexel, a note on the final plat stating "The City's interest in the State Leases..............is hereby partially abandoned by the recording of this plat." The dedication of Drexel will then reestablish the R/W in the new alignment. |
| 03/02/2007 | LAITH ALSHAMI | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | Laith Alshami, Engineering and Floodplain Review, 03/02/2007, TO: Patricia Gehlen FROM: Laith Alshami, P.E. CDRC Engineering SUBJECT: Pavilions S06-204, T15S, R15E, SECTION 01 RECEIVED: Tentative Plat, Landscape Plan and Drainage Report on September 25, 2006 The subject submittal has been reviewed and it can not be approved at this time. Address the following comments before review can continue. Prepare a detailed response that explains the revisions that were made and references the exact location in the drainage report and on the Tentative Plat where the revisions were made: Master Drainage Report: 1. The location of the stormwater conveyance system, within lot 2, appears inappropriate especially if it is a channel. The selected location appears to utilize valuable developable land. This may cause the future owner/developer to design a development that does not comply with the Master Drainage Report. The conveyance system will require the dedication of a drainage easement that might conflict with future buildings. This Office recommends relocating the conveyance system and showing within an easement to be dedicated by the Final Plat. 2. Lot one appears to be encumbered by an existing floodplain that causes it to undevelopable. It appears that lot 1 must be eliminated and the other lots shall be reconfigured and the site drainage shall be redesigned accordingly. The Engineer of Record might want to consider relocating the regional detention basin to the area where lot 1 is currently shown. 3. It appears that the 45' erosion hazard setback line is pointing to the wrong location. Revise all drainage exhibits accordingly. 4. The stormwater conveyance system along the east side of Houghton Road shall be addressed in the Master Drainage Report. Tentative Plat: 1. List, in General Note #37, the lot numbers that are impacted by the City of Tucson Floodplain Regulations (D.S. 2-03.2.2.C.2.a.). 2. Add a general note, which requires a floodplain use permit for any work within the regulatory floodplain (D.S. 2-03.2.2.C.2.b.). 3. The project tie to the basis of bearing is not clear, show clearly the tie between the basis of bearing and one of the subject parcel corner monuments (D.S. 2-03.2.3.A). 4. Due to the Scenic Corridor development restrictions and the size of the regulatory floodplain, it appears that lot #1 is not buildable. Verify that development within Lot #1 is possible. Otherwise, Lot #1 can be either designated as a common area or it can be part of other lots. 5. Provide the water surface elevations, at several locations, for all flows of 100-cfs or more (D.S. 2-03.2.3.J.1 and D.S. 2-03.2.4.L.6.). 6. It is still not clear how some proposed lots will have legal access. The "Reciprocal Easement Agreement" does not provide enough information to allow cross access over lot lines. Additionally, the Agreement describes access over the Common Areas, but the Common Areas are not shown on the Tentative Platy. Lots 6/7, 2/3 and 15/16/17 appear to need a cross access agreement (D.S. 2-03.2.4.F). 7. Call out the proposed curb and sidewalk on Houghton Road. Provide the sidewalk width. 8. Submit a written verification from Department of Transportation that the proposed improvements on Houghton Road acceptable. 9. Show Houghton Road public right of way width, recordation information, type and dimensioned width of paving, curbs, curb cuts and sidewalk as required by D.S. 2-05.2.3.C. 10. Revise the Tentative Plat in accordance with the drainage report revisions. Landscape Plan: The Landscape Plan is acceptable pertaining to Engineering and Floodplain Review RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Revised Tentative Plat and Drainage Report |
| 03/02/2007 | ROGER HOWLETT | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Denied | DEPARTMENT OF URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT S06-204 Pavilions 2/28/07 ( X ) Tentative Plat () Development Plan () Landscape Plan () Revised Plan/Plat () Board of Adjustment ( ) Other CROSS REFERENCE: C9-05-02 NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: Civano Master PAD – PAD 12 GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: Scenic Route COMMENTS DUE BY: March 2, 2007 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: () No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment () Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions () RCP Proposal Complies With Plan Policies ( X ) See Additional Comments Attached () No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: ( X ) Resubmittal Required: ( X ) Tentative Plat () Development Plan ( X ) Landscape Plan ( ) CC&R’s REVIEWER: JBeall 791-4505 DATE: 2/28/07 Comments Please add note to landscape/irrigation plan with exact wording as follows: “Landscape irrigation in the common areas, right-of-way and some residential areas will be accomplished with reclaimed water.” Civano Master PAD Sec. C-8 |
| 03/02/2007 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1) Per Section E-4 of the Civano Master Planned Area Development, the minimum "Perimeter Landscape Area around the Perimeter of the Pavilions PAD (other than along Houghton Road ) is 25 feet. It may be reduced to zero if NOS area (on-site or off-site) of 25 feet or more is adjacent to proposed landscape border under certain circumstances. Address the landscape border requirements on the landscape plan. Although the PAD contains additional development standards for the Sierra Morado frontage, there does not appear to be an exception to the buffer required on page 122. 2) Revise the tentative plat to provide easements for required landscape buffers. LUC 4.1.8.4 3) A plant/habitat inventory and mitigation plan will be required for any proposed development that impacts the Mesquite Wash. It appears that portions of Drexel Road shown on the tentative plat impact the regulated WASH area. TCC Sec-29, Art.VIII. 4) Revise the Riparian WASH Plant/Habitat Inventory and Assessment to delineate the Mesquite Wash study area (consisting of the channel, the banks, and the land area extending fifty (50) feet from the banks). Development in the study area is restricted, unless approved by Development Services. TCC Sec. 29-15.(b) The report should demonstrate how the plat is designed to meet the criteria. State if preservation on individual lots is to be addressed on subsequent plans. 5) Add a note referencing all lots impacted by the WASH regulations in General Note 17 of the tentative plat. Clarify if individual lots will prepare seperate WASH Plans for future development. DS 2-03.2.2.C.3 6) Revise the plans as necessary to obtain Scenic Corridor Overlay Zone approval. LUC 2.8.2 7) Document compliance with PAD Section E4.d by addressing the potential preservation and salvage of additional protected plants not inventoried as part of the set-aside. 8) Clarify that the NPP plan really just documents compliance for the initial infrastructure phase and that additional plans will be required. Revise the titles, calculations, and formatting where necessary to demonstrate that the initial phase meets requirements independent of future phases. 9) A landscape/mitigation plan will be required for the Houghton Road NPP plan. 10) Identify groups of four parellel lines from Houghton Road on sheets 3 & 4 of the NPP plans. 11) All lettering and dimensions shall be the equivalent of twelve (0.12") point or greater in size. Revise the NPP plans as necessary. DS 2-05.2.1.A RESUBMITTAL OF ALL PLANS IS REQUIRED. |
| 03/13/2007 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES March 13, 2007 Robert M. Suarez R S Engineering, Inc. 140 North Tucson Blvd. Tucson, Arizona 85716 Subject: S06-204 PavilionsTentative Plat Dear Robert: Your submittal of February 1, 2007 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a DETAILED cover letter explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLACKLINES MUST BE FOLDED 10 Copies Revised Tentative Plat (Zoning, Addressing, Landscape, Engineering, TEP, DUPD, Real Estate, Parks and Recreation, Wastewater, DSD) 6 Copies Revised Landscape Plan (Zoning, Landscape, Engineering, DUPD, Parks and Recreation, DSD) 2 Copies Revised Riparian WASH Plant/Habitat Inventory and Assessment (Landscape, DSD) 2 Copies NPPO Plans (Landscape, DSD) 2 Copies Revised Drainage Report (Engineering, DSD) 2 Copies Plant/Habitat Inventory and Mitigation Plan (Landscape, DSD) 2 Copies Cross Access Agreements (Zoning, DSD) Should you have any questions, please call me at 791-5608 extension 1179. Sincerely, Patricia Gehlen CDRC Manager All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: 791-9405 |
| 03/13/2007 | GLENN HICKS | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Denied | DATE: March 9, 2007 TO: Ferne Rodriguez, Development Services FROM: Glenn Hicks Parks and Recreation 791-4873 ext. 215 Glenn.Hicks@tucsonaz.gov CC: SUBJECT: S06-204 Pavilions: Tentative Plat Review(2-1-07) Denied. Show Houghton Rd cross-section that includes greenway. Show cross-section and detail of greenway path. Indicate specifications for pathway. Show landscaping and irrigation for greenway. Indicate all plans for improvements in the right-of-way that affect the greenway will be approved by Parks and Recreation. Contact Parks and Recreation to discuss requirements for Mesquite Ranch Wash Trail. |