Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Plan Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Plan Number - S06-203
Review Name: TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 09/22/2006 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 09/27/2006 | JOSE ORTIZ | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Denied | September 27, 2006 ACTIVITY NUMBER: S06-203 PROJECT NAME: Venado Vista PROJECT ADDRESS: 1470 S Melpomene Way PROJECT REVIEWER: Jose E. Ortiz PE, Traffic Engineer Resubmittal Required: Traffic Engineering does not recommend approval of the Tentative Plat; therefore a revised Tentative Plat is required for re-submittal. The following items must be revised or added to the plat. 1. Include a response letter with the next submittal that states how all comments have been addressed. 2. Show and label both existing and future SVTs (DS 2-03.2.4.M). If the existing and future SVTs are the same then label it as both existing and future. 3. Provide a copy of the approved Rezoning case to ensure that all traffic conditions are being met. 4. A private improvement agreement (PIA) will be necessary for the proposed work to be performed within the Right-of-way. An approved tentative plat is required prior to applying for a PIA. Contact the PIA Coordinator for additional PIA information at 791-5550 ext. 11107. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-4259 x305 or Jose.Ortiz@tucsonaz.gov |
| 09/28/2006 | KAROL ARAGONEZ | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Karol Aragonez Planner PROJECT: S06-203 Venado Vista Tentative Plat TRANSMITTAL DATE: September 25, 2006 DUE DATE: October 20, 2006 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. Section 5.3.8.2, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a development plan. If, at the end of that time, the development plan has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this development plan is September 24, 2007. 2. Case number S06-203 has been assigned to this tentative plat (TP). Please place this number in the right corner of all sheets of the tentative plat, landscape plan, NPPO, and any other associated sheets. Also place the annexation number C15-05-05 on all sheets as well since this ordinance added the ERZ designation. Please provide a separate response letter detailing compliance with rezoning conditions. DS 2-03.2.2.B.1 3. Please correct general note 2. The existing zoning of the property is SR. DS 2-03.2.2.B.2 4. Please draw all existing easements on the plan along with recordation information, location, width, and purpose. If an easement is no longer in use and scheduled to be vacated or has been abandoned, so indicate. If none exist provide response to reviewer's comments. Also if easements are purposed please draw, dimension and label as to their purpose and whether they will be public or private. If none exist provide response to reviewer's comments. DS 2-03.2.3.C & J 5. Because Melpomene is being treated as a future MS&R designated street per the rezoning, sidewalks are required to be a minimum of six (6) feet in width within Melpomene Way. Street cross section 5/3 should provide the required ninety (90) foot wide MS&R cross section per the MS&R Plan, ten (10) foot pedestrian area, seventeen foot travel lane (includes bike path), twelve (12) foot travel lane and six (6) foot half turn lane. Please contact City Engineering for specific details. Revise keynote 12 by removing reference to Pima County MS&R. MS&R Plan & DS 2-03.2.4.H 6. Please clarify location of property boundaries between lots 3 and 4 and 15 and 16. These are not apparent. DS 2-03.2.4.A 7. Street cross section 3/3 identifies the property line as being the centerline alignment. Wouldn't the property line fall on the south side of the cross section? Also the wedge curb proposed for the south side of the street is to be replaced with a vertical curb since a sidewalk is not proposed along that side to prevent vehicles from parking in the pedestrian path. This would allow the parallel parking along the south side to be reduced to seven (7) feet if the applicant wishes to do so. Please revise. DS 3-01.3.3.A.4 8. Please revise keynote 17. Required interior setbacks when utilizing RX-2 RCP is six (6) feet, not three (3) feet. LUC 3.6.1.4.D.2.d.2 9. Please revise the keynote 18 and plat to show the correct location of the measurement of the required MS&R setback for Melpomene Way. The greater of twenty-one (21) or height is measured from the back of future curb location which would be ten (10) feet back from the proposed right-of-way line, which would place it close to the proposed ten (10) foot buffer yard. LUC 3.2.6.5.B.1 10. A separate Special Application, review, and approval for the Environmental Resource Zone (ERZ) overlay is required. For more information the applicant must contact Patricia Gehlen at 791-5608 ext. 1179. The application form is on the DSD website at http://www.tucsonaz.gov/dsd/Forms_Fees___Maps/Applications/Overlay_Zone_Application.pdf. Submittal material will include an Environmental Resource Report as established in DS 9-06.0. A mitigation plan as required in LUC Sec. 2.8.6.5.D must be provided. Permits for grubbing, grading, construction, or any other improvements will not be issued until all applicable requirements of LUC Sec. 2.8.6.5 and 2.8.6.6 are met. All applications for ERZ shall be reviewed by the Stormwater Advisory Committee, which will make recommendations on the application to the DSD Director. 11. Please provide either the footprint of a unit on each lot or provide typical plot plan layouts for a corner lot, an interior lot, and a lot affected by the perimeter yard setback. DS 2-10.3.1.B 12. Please verify if the site coverage calculation includes the square footage of all proposed structures within the subdivision as well as the vehicle use area. Add maximum allowed height and provide proposed height, and minimum allowed site area and proposed site area. LUC 3.2.3.1.F & DS 2-10.3.1.C 13. Please add note indicating how many and which units will be provided with barrier-free accessibility. Twenty-five (25) percent of the units (5) are required to be accessible. DS 2-10.3.1.D & LUC 3.6.1.4.A.5 14. Please provide three (3) copies of CC&Rs and two (2) copies of common use agreements for the easements over individually owned property. DS 2-10.3.2.E & F 15. Please note if the City request bus turnout lanes and bus waiting shelter they must be provided. LUC 3.6.1.4.A.7 16. Please provide on the TP that all mechanical equipment shall be screened from adjacent streets exterior to the project site and from adjacent existing residential development. If ground mounted and screened by property walls please provide note stating that. If roof mounted provide a detail showing how screening will be architecturally integrated with the overall design of the RCP. LUC 3.6.1.4.A.9 17. Please remove general note 15. It is a repeat of general note 13. 18. Please add note stating "There shall be no further division of land or resubdivision without the developer or successor in interest furnishing written notice to all property owners of record within the boundaries of the RCP. IN no event shall further division of land occur without the written approval of the Mayor and Council". LUC 3.6.1.4.A.10 19. Please show existing and future SVTs on the tentative plat. 20. All changes, modifications, and/or corrections must be made on all applicable plans including the development plan, landscape plan, and NPPO. Once changes, modifications, and/or corrections are made and reviewed further comments may result. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Karol Aragonez, (520) 791-5550, ext. 1197. KAA S:\zoning review\karol\planning\cdrc\tentativeplat\S06-203tp.doc RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised tentative plat, CC&R's and additional requested documents. |
| 09/29/2006 | TOM MARTINEZ | OTHER AGENCIES | AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION | Approved | NO COMMENT S06-203 GREGOR ENGINEERING. INC. VENADO VISTA -------------------------------------------------------- Confidentiality and Nondisclosure Notice: This email transmission and any attachments are intended for use by the person(s)/entity(ies) named above and may contain confidential/privileged information. Any unauthorized use, disclosure or distribution is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by e-mail, and delete or destroy all copies plus attachments. |
| 10/03/2006 | JCLARK3 | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Denied | * No known landfill within 1000 feet of this development. * Lot 19 frontage along the PAAL doesnot show how a service truck could turnaround. Need clarification on this or a note on the tentative that states that the refuse for lot 19 will be serviced off Melpomene Way. * Lots 1-18 have curbside frontage and can be serviced with APC's for curbside pickup. |
| 10/03/2006 | JIM EGAN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Denied | 1. The first 600 feet of the fire lane must be 36 feet wide. Detail 2 cannot be in this area. See DS 301.01 6.2 for dead end streets. The turn around at the end must be full sized 53.5 foot radius. 2. Several lots have building area over 150 feet from the fire lane and will require automatic sprinkler systems. 3. The south access road requires a turn around. |
| 10/06/2006 | FRODRIG2 | OTHER AGENCIES | PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS | Approved | Transportation Information for Rezoning, Subdivision, and Development Requests Delivered to: Date Delivered: City of Tucson - Development Services 10/6/2006 Case Number Project Name Average number of daily trips (ADT) forecasted as a result of the proposed development This information is provided for jurisdictional planning departments to assess the impact of the proposed residential or commercial development on surrounding traffic patterns and roads. If the forecasted daily traffic exceeds 500 average daily trips, a more detailed analysis is also provided. S06-203 182 Venado Vista Pima Association of Governments Sandra C. Holland, Data Services 177 N. Church Ave., Suite 405, Tucson, Arizona 85701-1127 (520) 792-1093 FAX (520) 620-6981 |
| 10/19/2006 | KAY MARKS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Denied | 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 KAY MARKS ADDRESSING OFFICIAL PH: 740-6480 FAX #: 740-6370 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL SUBJECT: S06-203 VENADO VISTA/TENTATIVE PLAT DATE: 10/18/06 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and the following matters must be resolved prior to our approval: Delete direction “S” from Melpomene Way on sheet 1. Will the proposed Road “B” provide access to the existing Church? If so, please advise them that their address will change upon recordation of this plat. Label approved interior street names on Final Plat. es |
| 10/23/2006 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1) Submit an Environmental Resource report Per DS 1-07 Exhibit III to document compliance with the Native Plant Preservation regulations. LUC 3.8.6.4.A 2) Submit a study of the Resource Corridor associated with the Coronado Ridge Wash and a mitigation plan as part of the Environmental Resource Report. A seperate application is required for the ERZ. 3) The street crossing of Coronado Ridge Wash must be constructed in such a manner as to provide means for safe and accessible passage for the movement of wildlife. LUC 2.8.6.6.A.4 4) The Land Use Code states that box culverts should be a minimum of six (6) feet in height. Provide information regarding why the type of crossing proposed is appropriate and why a 6' high culvert is less appropriate. 5) A "common area" is required for the street landscape border along Melpomene Way. LUC 3.7.2.4.A.1.c 6) Revise the native plant preservation plan and the tentative plat to exclude utility easements from the calculations for NUOS. LUC 3.8.6.4.B Ensure that the calculations on the plat and native plant preservation plan are equivalent. 7) Incorporate ERZ mitigation requirements in the landscape plans. Include a summary and planting plan. |
| 10/25/2006 | ED ABRIGO | PIMA COUNTY | ASSESSOR | Approved | Office of the Pima County Assessor 115 N. Church Ave. Tucson, Arizona 85701 BILL STAPLES ASSESSOR TO: CDRC Office Subdivision Review City of Tucson (FAX# 791-5559) FROM: Gary Ault, Mapping Supervisor Pima County Assessor's Office Mapping Department DATE: October 24, 2006 RE: Assessor's Review and Comments Regarding Tentative Plat S06-203 VENADO VISTA T141524 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * X Plat meets Assessor's Office requirements. _______ Plat does not meet Assessor's Office requirements. COMMENTS: PLEASE MAKE THE FOLLOWING ADJUSTMENTS BY FINAL PLAT STAGE: 1. ADD MILES OF NEW STREETS EVEN IF IT IS 0 TO GENERAL NOTES. 2. ADD DIMS AND BEARINGS FOR ALL LOT LINES. THANK YOU FOR YOUR SUBMITTAL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS PLEASE CALL ROSANNA WERNER AT 740-4390 NOTE: THE ASSESSOR'S CURRENT INVOLVEMENT IN PROCESSING ITS MANUAL MAPS TO DIGITAL FORMAT IS EXPEDITED GREATLY BY EXCHANGE OF DIGITAL DATA. IN THE COURSE OF RECORDING THIS SUBDIVISION YOUR ASSISTANCE IN PROVIDING THIS OFFICE WITH AN AUTOCAD COPY WOULD BE GREATLY APPRECIATED. THANK YOU FOR ANY DIGITAL DATA PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED. ROSANNA WERNER |
| 10/26/2006 | GLENN HICKS | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Denied | DATE: October 25, 2006 TO: Ferne Rodriguez, Development Services FROM: Glenn Hicks Parks and Recreation 791-4873 ext. 215 Glenn.Hicks@tucsonaz.gov CC: SUBJECT: S06-203 Venado Vista: Tentative Plat Review(9-25-06) Show the trail easement extending all the way to the north property line. |
| 10/27/2006 | ROGER HOWLETT | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Denied | DEPARTMENT OF URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT S06-203 Venado Vista September 25, 2006 (X) Tentative Plat () Development Plan (X) Landscape Plan () Revised Plan/Plat () Board of Adjustment () Other CROSS REFERENCE: C9-05-31 Oldooz - Melpomne Way Rezoning NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: General Plan GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: No COMMENTS DUE BY: October 20, 2006 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: () No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment () Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions () RCP Proposal Complies With Plan Policies (X) See Additional Comments Attached () No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: (X) Resubmittal Required: (X) Tentative Plat () Development Plan (X) Landscape Plan () Other REVIEWER: msp 791-4505 DATE: October 17, 2006 Department of Urban Planning & Design Comments S06-203 Venado Vista: Tentative Plat Review October 17, 2006 Staff offers the following comments: 1. Please revise the tentative plat to clearly distinguish the required public trail improvements along the east side of the Coronado Ridge Wash. This may be accomplished by adding an overlay design (grey tone, hatch pattern, or other considerations ..etc.) so as to clearly identify the location of the public trail system within the subdivision. Please add the new overlay information, which identifies the public trial to tentative plat legend on sheet 1 of 3, and to subdivision layout on sheet 2 of 3. 2. Please revise the landscape plan to include the required public trail requirements, as per rezoning case C9-05-31, condition # 8, which reads: A minimum fifteen-foot wide, naturally vegetated, non-motorized, public trail easement shall be dedicated along the east side of Coronado Ridge Wash. Location shall be coordinated with the Parks and Recreation Department. In addition, please provide documentation that the public trail requirements (rezoning condition #8) are under review by the Department of Parks and Recreation. 3. Venado Vista is proposed as an RCP subdivision. All RCP projects are subject to Area Plan, General Plan policy direction, and guidance provided by the Design Guideline Manual. Therefore, please revise landscape plan to include a native canopy tree on every other lot, within the front yards, 10 feet from back of sidewalk. 4. Please revise tentative plat to provide a cross-section of the required public trail improvements. Also, provide an additional cross-section which shows how the public trail meets ADA standards as the public trail transitions from natural grade within the Coronado Ridge Wash onto the finish grade of the private interior street. |
| 10/27/2006 | PGEHLEN1 | TUCSON WATER NEW AREA DEVELOPMENT | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 10/31/2006 | LIZA CASTILLO | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Denied | 4350 E. Irvington Road, Tucson, AZ 85714 Post Office Box 711, Tucson, AZ 85702 WR# 170735 October 16, 2006 Gregor Engineering, Inc. Attn: Steve Gregor 5232 E. Pima St. Ste. A Tucson, AZ 85712 Dear Mr. Gregor, SUBJECT: Venado Vista Lots 1 thru 19 S06-203 Tucson Electric Power Company (TEP) has reviewed the tentative plat dated September 25, 2006. This Company is unable to approve the plat at this time. There are possible conflicts with the existing electrical facilities within the boundaries of the development. The facilities along with the easement recording information must be shown on the plat prior to approval. If an existing easement is not found add a dimensioned easement by prescription and a general note that the facilities will be abandoned. All relocation costs will be billable to the developer. The existing underground service through the church should be shown. The existing conflicts is the underground service through Lots 18 & 19. Please direct questions concerning easement(s) to Liza Castillo, Right-of-Way Agent in our Land Department at 520-917-8745. TEP will provide a preliminary electrical design on the Approved Tentative Plat within fifteen (15) working days upon receipt of the plat. Additional plans necessary for preparation of the design are: building plans including water, electrical, landscape, sidewalk and paving plans. Should you have any questions, please contact Frank Kilpatrick at (520) 918-8227. Sincerely, Henrietta Noriega Office Specialist Design/Build hn enclosures cc: P. Gehlen – Emailed City of Tucson C. Thomas– Letter only F. Kilpatrick- Designer |
| 10/31/2006 | FRODRIG2 | COT NON-DSD | REAL ESTATE | Denied | S06-203 Venado Vista: Tentative Plat Review - Request validation of dedication of R/W along S. Melpomene Way. Plat shows a dedication to Pima Co. in place of the City. |
| 11/01/2006 | PAUL MACHADO | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | To: Patricia Gehlen DATE: October 30, 2006 SUBJECT: Venado Vista, 1470 S. Melpomene Way Tentative Plat S06-203 (First Review) T14S, R15E, Section 24 RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Subdivision Plat and Drainage Report. The Tentative Plat (TP) and Drainage Report (DR) cannot be approved as submitted. Please address the following review comments prior to the next submittal. Tentative Plat: 1. Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the DP. 2. This parcel is subject to the Xeroriparian Intermediate Habitat and an ERZ overlay zone and is required to under go the overlay zone process. Applicants proposing a project with encroachments into the Xeroriparian Intermediate Habitat zone, the proposed ERZ zone or the one hundred (100) year floodplain are required to submit a mitigation plan in accordance with Sec. 2.8.6.5.D of the LUC and an Environmental Resource Report as defined in Sec. 6.2.5 of the LUC. Compliance with regulations in accordance with the DSD - Procedure are also required. Contact Patricia Gehlen at 791-5550 x1179 or via e-mail at Patricia.Gahlen@tucsonaz.gov for assistance with the review process. 3. Any roadway, bike path or walkway improvement which impedes the movement of wildlife must be constructed in such a manner as to provide means for safe and accessible passage. Improvements or encroachments into critical riparian habitat areas should be constructed to minimize disruption of vegetation and critical riparian habitat. Where culverts are used, they should be box culverts a minimum of six (6) feet in height per the L.U.C. 2.8.6.6.A.4. Revise the size of the pipes as necessary. Correspondence from Ann Phillips at the Office of conservation and sustainable development is required and shall be included in the following submittal in order to satisfy this comment. 4. As per the Federal ADA requirements, all wheel chair ramps shall have the truncated domes instead of the standard grooves that are shown on COT SD 207. Aside from the Truncated Domes, all wheel chair ramps shall be constructed in accordance with COT SD 207. 5. Please provide property description per D.S. 2-02.2.1.3. 6. Please label lot dimensions and bearings per D.S. 2-02.2.1.5. List the cul-de-sac lot frontages. 7. Label existing and future sight visibility triangles per D.S. 2-02.2.1.10. 8. Show all points of egress and ingress including locations and width of driveways and parking area access lanes (P.A.A.L.) per D.S. 2-02.2.1.11. 9. Please list estimated cut & fill quantities per D.S. 2-02.2.1.17. 10. Remove the reference to the 15' additional R/W to be dedicated to the City of Tucson on the East side of Melpomene Road. 11. Dimension from street monument lines to existing and proposed curbs, sidewalks, driveways, and utility lines per D.S. 2-02.2.1.21. 5' concrete sidewalks on the interior streets and 6' concrete sidewalks on the MS&R are now required. 12. Complete TP number (S06-203) on all sheets per D.S. 2-02.2.1.29. 13. A permit or a private improvement agreement will be necessary for any work performed within the Right-of-way. Contact Permits and Codes at (520) 791-5100 for permit information. 14. Please show the proposed roof drainage patterns, 100% of the 10-year flow must be conveyed under the sidewalks including any other site drainage as well. Please provide supporting calculations to demonstrate compliance with D.S. 3-01.4.4. If the location(s) of the roof scuppers have not yet been decided, a general note indicating sidewalk scuppers will be used when the roof scuppers locations have been designed and located will suffice. A sidewalk scupper will be needed at the low pt. at the main crossing. 15. "A grading permit and Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plans (SWPPP's) will be required for this project. Submit 4 sets of grading and SWPPP's with text, upon completion and submittal of a grading permit application. A grading permit may not be issued prior to site plan approval. Subsequent comments may be necessary, depending upon the nature and extent of revisions that occur to the plans". 16. All new and replacement water supply and sanitary sewage systems shall be designed to minimize or eliminate infiltration of floodwaters into the system and discharge from systems into floodwaters. On-site waste disposal systems shall be located to avoid impairment to them or contamination from them during flooding. Waste disposal systems shall not be installed wholly or partially in a floodway per Section 26-6.2, Standards for Construction of Utility Systems. 17. Demonstrate all weather access for all lots. Drainage Report: 1. Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the DR. 2. This review was performed for Tentative Plat purposes only. Final review and acceptance will be done at the grading plan stage. 3. This parcel is subject to the Xeroriparian Intermediate Habitat and an ERZ overlay zone and is required to under go the overlay zone process. Applicants proposing a project with encroachments into the Xeroriparian Intermediate Habitat zone, the proposed ERZ zone or the one hundred (100) year floodplain are required to submit a mitigation plan in accordance with Sec. 2.8.6.5.D of the LUC and an Environmental Resource Report as defined in Sec. 6.2.5 of the LUC. Compliance with regulations in accordance with the DSD - Procedure are also required. Contact Patricia Gehlen at 791-5550 x1179 or via e-mail at Patricia.Gahlen@tucsonaz.gov for assistance with the review process. 4. Any roadway, bike path or walkway improvement which impedes the movement of wildlife must be constructed in such a manner as to provide means for safe and accessible passage. Improvements or encroachments into critical riparian habitat areas should be constructed to minimize disruption of vegetation and critical riparian habitat. Where culverts are used, they should be box culverts a minimum of six (6) feet in height per the L.U.C. 2.8.6.6.A.4. Revise the size of the pipes as necessary. Correspondence from Ann Phillips at the Office of conservation and sustainable development is required and shall be included in the following submittal in order to satisfy this comment. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-5550 x1193 or Paul.Machado@ci.tucsonaz.govs Paul P. Machado Senior Engineering Associate City of Tucson/Development Services Department 201 N. Stone Avenue P.O. Box 27210 Tucson, Arizona 85726-7210 (520) 791-5550 x1193 office (520) 879-8010 fax C:/1470 S. Melpomene Way CDRC |
| 11/20/2006 | FRODRIG2 | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Denied | November 17, 2006 To: Steve Gregor, Gregor Engineering Thru: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Project Manager City of Tucson Development Services Department ____________________________________ From: Michael J.Harrington (520-740-6579), representing the Pima County Departments of Wastewater Management and Environmental Quality Subject: Venado Vista Lots 1-19 and Common Area "A" Tentative Plat - 1st Submittal S06-203 The proposed sewer collection lines for the above-referenced project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use. This project will be tributary to the Ina Road Water Pollution Control Facility via the Tanque Verde Interceptor. Obtain a letter from the PCWMD's Development Services Section, written within the past 90 days, stating that treatment and conveyance system capacity for the project is available in the downstream public sewerage system and provide a copy of that letter to this office. The required form to request such a letter may be found at: http://www.pima.gov/wwm/forms/docs/CapResponseRequest.pdf. The tentative plat for this project cannot be approved until a copy of this letter has been received by this office. All Sheets: Add the subdivision case number, S06-203, to the title block of each sheet. This number should be shown larger or bolder than any cross reference numbers. No wastewater review fees will be charged for sheets where this is the only required revision. Sheet 1: Revise General Note #9 so that it states: THE ON-SITE AND OFF-SITE SANITARY SEWERS, EXCEPT PUBLIC SEWERS WITHIN PUBLIC SEWER EASEMENTS OR RIGHTS-OF-WAY, WILL BE PRIVATE AND WILL BE CONSTRUCTED, OPERATED AND MAINTAINED ON A PRIVATE BASIS, AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH AN APPROVED OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE PLAN, IF REQUIRED. THE LOCATION AND METHOD OF CONNECTION TO AN EXISTING PUBLIC SANITARY SEWER IS SUBJECT TO REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE PIMA COUNTY WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT. Sheet 1: Add a General Note that states: THE REQUIRED OFF-SITE PUBLIC SANITARY SEWER RELOCATION PROJECT WILL BE DESIGNED AND CONSTRUCTED TO PIMA COUNTY WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT STANDARDS. Sheet 2: Revise the design so that: Gravity sewer collection is provided from MH # 10 to downstream MH #9. Sheet 2: Show the invert elevations for the proposed private sewer and the culvert crossings. This may be satisfied by adding the sewer pipe to cross section 7, on sheet 3, and displaying the minimum pipe separation. Sheet 3: Show the proposed public and private sewer lines using different line-types, so that they can readily be distinguished from each other. Also, show and describe examples of these different line-types in the legend on Sheet 1. Sheets 3: You have proposed the replacement of an existing public sewer for the purpose of obtaining greater depth in connecting to the existing sewerage collection system. Public sewer elements will be abandoned and replaced with new public sewer elements. Your intentions need to be made very clear in the next submittal. Revise the label (REMOVE 114LF…), so that it states something like: EXISTING SANITARY SEWER LINE TO BE ABANDONED BY SEPARATE INSTRUMENT AND REMOVED COMPLETELY. Also, this should also be made clear in the General Notes on sheet 1. The following wording is used with public sewer improvement plans and these two notes may be modified to fit this situation. Existing manhole(s) [ #s ] of [ PCWWMD plan # ] is(are) to be removed. Contractor shall remove the rim and cover. The manhole(s) will be demolished completely and filled and compacted with select material to 95% density. The salvaged rim and cover shall be delivered to PCWWMD at the location as specified by the inspector. The contractor shall dispose of all manhole demolition material off site at a landfill or other approved location. [ Length ] lf of existing [ diameter] public sewer from manhole # [ # ] to manhole # [ # ] of [ PCWMD plan # ] is to be abandoned. Remove sewer completely. Sewer shall NOT be abandoned in place. You are proposing the construction of a private sewer collection system in a residential subdivision. This type of sewer now necessitates prior written authorization, pursuant to PCWMD Director, Michael Gritzuk’s letter to PCDSD Director, Carmine DeBonis, dated March 13, 2006, regarding Private Sewers and Public Pump Stations. Provide approval, in writing from the PCWMD Directors office. Mr. Mike Bunch, PCWMD Deputy Director, is the contact for the above-mentioned approval. A copy of Mr. Gritzuk’s letter, to Mr. DeBonis, is being provided for your inspection with this email. This office will require a revised set of bluelines, and a response letter, addressing these comments. Additional comments may be made during the review of these documents. Pima County Code Title 13.20.030.A.2 requires that a wastewater review fee be paid for each submittal of the tentative or preliminary plat. The fee for the first submittal is $166 plus $50 per sheet. For the second submittal, the review fee is $50 per sheet. For all subsequent submittals, the review fee is $39 per sheet. The next submittal of this project will be the second (2nd) submittal. A check for the review fee of this submittal in the amount of $150.00 (made out to PIMA COUNTY TREASURER) must accompany the revised set of bluelines and response letter. If the number of sheets changes, please adjust the review fee accordingly. If you have any questions regarding the above mentioned comments, please contact me at the telephone number shown under my signature on the first page of this letter CC: Project File |
| 11/21/2006 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES November 21, 2006 Steve Gregor P.E. Gregor Engineering, Inc. 5232 East Pima Street, Suite A Tucson, Arizona 85712 Subject: S06-203 Venado VistaTentative Plat Dear Steve: Your submittal of September 25, 2006 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a DETAILED cover letter explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLACKLINES MUST BE FOLDED 13 Copies Revised Tentative Plat (ESD, Traffic, Zoning, Fire, Addressing, Landscape, Parks and Recreation, DUPD, Real Estate, TEP, Engineering, Wastewater, DSD) 6 Copies Revised Landscape Plan (Zoning, Landscape, Parks and Recreation, DUPD, Engineering, DSD) 2 Copies Revised NPPO Plan (Landscape, DSD) 2 Copies Revised Drainage Report (Engineering, DSD) Should you have any questions, please call me at 791-5608 extension 1179. Sincerely, Patricia Gehlen CDRC Manager All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: 319-1181 Tp-resubmittal |