Plan Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Plan Number - S06-185
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 06/19/2007 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 07/03/2007 | ROGER HOWLETT | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Approved | DEPARTMENT OF URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT S06-185 Starr Pass Vistas Village 1 (ü) Tentative Plat - RCP ( ) Development Plan (ü) Landscape Plan ( ) Revised Plan/Plat ( ) Board of Adjustment ( ) Other CROSS REFERENCE: N/A NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: Tumamoc Area Plan, Subarea 4 GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: N/A COMMENTS DUE BY: July 18, 2007 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: ( ) No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment ( ) Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions ( ) RCP Proposal Complies With Plan Policies ( ) See Additional Comments Attached (ü) No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on 3/28/07 - thank you (ü) No Resubmittal Required ( ) Tentative Plat ( ) Development Plan ( ) Landscape Plan ( ) Other REVIEWER: Joanne Hershenhorn 791-4505 DATE: 6/29/07 |
| 07/16/2007 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 07/17/2007 | KAROL ARAGONEZ | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Karol Aragonez Planner PROJECT: S06-185 Starr Pass Vistas Village 1 Tentative Plat Resubmittal TRANSMITTAL DATE: July 13, 2007 DUE DATE: July 18, 2007 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. Three (3) copies of CC&R were not found in submittal package provided to staff. Review of CC&Rs will be accomplished at final plat submittal. 2. Previous comment. Please provide a detail as to how screening of the mechanical equipment is done. If ground mounted and screened by property walls please provide note stating that. If roof mounted provide a detail showing how screening will be architecturally integrated with the overall design of the RCP. LUC 3.6.1.4.A.9 Because general note 21 states that ground mounted equipment "may be" screened with yard walls and as such does not provide a definitive answer the comment will remain until a detail is provided or wording revised from may be to will or shall. RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised tentative plat and additional requested documents. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Karol Aragonez, (520) 791-5550, ext. 74960. KAA S:\zoning review\karol\planning\cdrc\tentativeplat\S06-185tpr1tp.doc RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised tentative plat, CC&R's, and additional requested documents. |
| 07/31/2007 | GLENN HICKS | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Approved | DATE: July 31, 2007 TO: DSD_CDRC@ tucsonaz.gov FROM: Glenn Hicks Parks and Recreation 791-4873 ext. 215 Glenn.Hicks@tucsonaz.gov SUBJECT: S06-185 Starr Pass Vistas Village I: Resubmittal(6-19-06) CDRC Tentative Plat Review Approved. |
| 08/10/2007 | ELIZABETH EBERBACH | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | TO: Patricia Gehlen; CDRC Coordinator SUBJECT: Starr Pass Vistas Village 1 (S06-185) Tentative Plat 3rd Review and ERZ / HDZ Overlay review REVIEWER: Elizabeth Eberbach LOCATION: T14S R13E Section 16 ACTIVITY NUMBER: S06-185, T07SA00049 SUMMARY: The revised Tentative Plat sheets, revised Drainage Report, geotechnical report, landscape documents, TDOT correspondence, title report, and response letters were received by Engineering for review. The Drainage Report was reviewed for Tentative Plat purposes only. Engineering does not recommend approval of the Tentative Plat at this time. PROJECT SAC SUMMARY: For this submittal, the Starr Pass Vistas Village 1 project proposes no encroachment into the Silvercroft ERZ Wash. The existing Silvercroft Wash is designated as an ERZ Wash located along the west and north boundaries of the project. The wash is a natural channel with sand, rock, and desert vegetation. The wash channel width varies and has a tributary wash converging at the west side of the project contributing a 232 cfs to the Silvercroft Wash's 1,862 cfs during the 100-year event. In this submittal, the proposed trail along the west and south banks is now relocated outside of the 100-year floodplain limits, and there are no utility grading or drainage improvement structures proposed in the ERZ floodplain area. Engineering recommends approval of the Starr Pass Vistas Village 1 ERZ Overlay. HDZ OVERLAY SUMMARY: Engineering recommends approval of the Starr Pass Vistas Village 1 HDZ Overlay. DRAINAGE COMMENTS: 1) DS Sec.10-02.2.3.1.9: Add page numbers or tabs or some other clarification to find appendix items in Drainage report. Specifically, provide reference page for the following comments: a) Provide street capacity analysis at a northeast street section using 42cfs entering basin. b) Update threshold retention calculations. 2) DS Sec.2-03.2.4.L.2: Check/revise PAD elevations and proposed finished floor elevations for lots 1-6, 9, and 10 to assure lots adjacent to floodplain are elevated to meet minimum floodplain ordinance requirements to assure minimum 1-foot above adjacent WSEL. TENTATIVE PLAT COMMENTS: 3) DS Sec.2-03.2.3.J.1: On sheet 1, clarify delineation of a floodplain line that appears to be the 404 bottom of the wash by providing as legend symbol. If there is 404 wash, the legend shall reflect this delineation. 4) DS Sec.11-01: Address the following conceptual grading design questions: a) DS Sec.2-03.2.4.L.2: Revise PAD elevations and proposed finished floor elevations for lots 1-6, 9, and 10 per the WSEL's shown or as determined by drainage report, to assure lots adjacent to floodplain are elevated to meet minimum floodplain ordinance requirements to assure minimum 1-foot above adjacent WSEL. b) DS Sec.2-03.2.4.M, 2-03.2.4.K: Project design should reflect geotechnical report recommendations. The typical lot grading detail shall reflect recommendations from geotechnical report for minimum sideyard setbacks for positive drainage from structure. Feasibility for project must be shown at Tentative Plat stage. Lots indicate side yard setbacks that do not comply with typical building setbacks nor geotechnical report. Revise lot sizes or show that lot grading is feasible with a typical lot detail. Clarify typical lot grading details on sheet 4, show lot grading information / clarification: i) The minimum side and rear setbacks, building setbacks to swales shall reflect recommendations per geotechnical report. The report states the same as building codes, at 10-ft. Side yard drainage section must be acceptable to geotechnical engineer. ii) Note 21 acknowledged. For feasibility concerns, show any A/C unit / utility pads if located along the side yards. The sideyard setback must be recommended/referenced in the Geotechnical Report. LANDSCAPE PLAN COMMENT: 5) DS Sec.3-01.5.1.A.1: Revise sheet 4 of Landscape plans to clarify width of basin access ramp. Minimum ramp width is 15-ft. The next submittal should address all the above items. Submit revised Tentative Plat, a bound copy of the geotechnical report, revised Drainage Report, title report, and response letter. If you have any questions before resubmittal, please call me at 837-4934. Elizabeth Eberbach, PE Civil Engineer Engineering Division Development Services |
| 08/13/2007 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES August 13, 2007 Mirela Hromatka Rick Engineering Company, Inc. 1745 East River Road, Suite 101 Tucson, Arizona 85718 Subject: S06-185 Starr Pass Vista Village I Tentative Plat Dear Mirela: Your submittal of June 19, 2007 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a DETAILED cover letter explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLACKLINES MUST BE FOLDED 3 Copies Revised Tentative Plat (Zoning, Engineering, DSD) 3 Copies Revised Landscape Plan (Zoning, Engineering, DSD) 2 Copies Bound Geotechnical Report (Engineering, DSD) 2 Copies Revised Drainage Report (Engineering, DSD) 2 Copies Title Report (Engineering, DSD) Should you have any questions, please call me at 837-4919. PRIOR TO RESUBMITTAL OF THESE PLANS, A WRITTEN REQUEST FOR A REVIEW EXTENSION MUST BE SUBMITTED TO AND APPROVED BY THE CDRC OFFICE. Sincerely, Patricia Gehlen CDRC Manager All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: 322-6956 |