Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Plan Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Plan Number - S06-182
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10/25/2006 | MARILYN KALTHOFF | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 11/01/2006 | JOSE ORTIZ | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Approved | |
| 11/07/2006 | KAROL ARAGONEZ | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Karol Aragonez Planner PROJECT: S06-182 The Post Tentative Plat Resubmittal TRANSMITTAL DATE: November 7, 2006 DUE DATE: November 21, 2006 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. Please add the contour interval on each sheet preferably with the north arrow and scale. DS 2-03.2.1.H 2. As acknowledged once detail easement information is obtained and placed on plan the development plan/tentative plat can be approved. 3. Please list as part of FAR calculations the maximum allowed FAR per LUC (10.5). Site coverage was not addressed (80% max.). Entrances on the ground floor to residential units are perceived to require site coverage calculations unless otherwise determined unnecessary by the Zoning Administrator. 4. Please revise Class 2 bicycle parking detail. Required separation between spaces measured from edge of rack is thirty (30) inches. The locating of bicycle parking within the right-of-way that is within 1,500 feet of the use will require approval from the City Engineer per LUC Sec. 3.3.6.2.C. LUC 3.3.1 & DS 2-09.1.0 5. As acknowledged the applicant will provide a separate response letter detailing compliance with rezoning conditions prior to Development plan/tentative plat approval. 6. As acknowledged the applicant will provide prior to development plan/tentative plat approval a copy of joint use agreement of wall abutting the south boundary of property owned by the Federal Government. 7. The applicant shall provide copy of DRB approval of project prior to development plan/tentative plat approval. This along with supplemental material provided shall serve as compliance to RND Zone Design Criteria. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Karol Aragonez, (520) 791-5550, ext. 1197. KAA S:\zoning review\karol\planning\cdrc\tentativeplat\S06-182tpr.doc RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised tentative plat and additional requested documents. |
| 11/15/2006 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | 1) Landscaping plantings in right-of-way or MS&R areas must be approved by the City Engineer or designee and comply with the City Engineer's requirements on construction, irrigation, location, and plant type. Provide verification, in writing, of any approvals obtained. Contact Gary Wittwer, DOT Landscape Architect for specific requirements. Approval of the plans by the Landscape section will be conditioned upon City Engineer approval and approval in accordance with the Administrative Design Review Procedures, 23A-32. 2) Trees with the potential for overhanging a walkway, driveway, bicycle path, parking space, or street must be of a type that, at maturity, provide a canopy with an understory height clearance of eight (8) feet for walkways and bicycle paths, twelve (12) feet for driveways and streets, and fifteen (15) feet for loading spaces. Revise the plans as necessary to meet TDOT requirements. 3) Obtain approval for refuse pickup locations from Environmental Services. The location should meet the overhead clearance standards of 6-01.2.1.B.1.b. This may affect tree placement. |
| 11/16/2006 | FRODRIG2 | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Approved | November 16, 2006 TO: Peggy Rau The WLB Group THRU: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Manager City of Tucson, Development Services Department FROM: Chandubhai Patel, P.E. Pima County Development Services Department Development Review Division (Wastewater) SUBJECT: The Post Condominiums Development Plan/Tentative Plat – 2nd Submittal S06-182 The proposed sewer collection lines to serve the above-referenced project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use. The Pima County Department of Environmental Quality and the Wastewater Management Department hereby approve the above referenced submittal of the Development Plan/Tentative Plat as received by us on October 25, 2006. Please note the following: Approval of the above referenced submittal does not authorize the construction of public or private sewer collection lines, or water distribution lines. Prior to the construction of such features, a Construction Authorization (Approval to Construct) may need to be obtained from the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality. Also, air quality activity permits must be secured by the developer or prime contractor from the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality before constructing, operating, or engaging in an activity which may cause or contribute to air pollution. If you have any question regarding the above comments, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, Chandubhai Patel, P.E. Telephone: (520) 740-6563 Copy: Project File |
| 11/17/2006 | MATT FLICK | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approved | Structural design for driveway scupper to be submitted as part of the PIA process. |
| 11/20/2006 | KAY MARKS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Denied | 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 KAY MARKS ADDRESSING OFFICIAL PH: 740-6480 FAX #: 740-6370 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL SUBJECT: S06-182 THE POST /REVISED TENTATIVE PLAT DATE: November 20, 2006 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and the following matters must be resolved prior to our approval: Add brief legal description to Title Block that includes Subdivision, Block, Lots, Book and Page. Label Condo Unit Numbers (per Pima County Policy) on Final Plat. jg |
| 11/21/2006 | ROGER HOWLETT | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Denied | DEPARTMENT OF URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT S06-182 The Post 11/20/06 ( X ) Tentative Plat ( X ) Development Plan ( X ) Landscape Plan () Revised Plan/Plat () Board of Adjustment () Other CROSS REFERENCE: C9-06-25 NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: El Centro Redevelopment Plan GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: COMMENTS DUE BY: November 21, 2006 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: () No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment () Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions () RCP Proposal Complies With Plan Policies ( X ) See Additional Comments Attached () No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: ( X ) Resubmittal Required: ( X ) Tentative Plat ( X ) Development Plan ( X ) Landscape Plan ( X ) Other – Elevations of Pedestrian Street Level REVIEWER: JBeall 791-4505 DATE: 11/16/06 It should be noted that the Post project has concurrently submitted an application for development review and rezoning. Hence this development is being reviewed without finalized rezoning comments and any review comments are conditional until such rezoning comments are completed and reviewed. The applicant will need to address the following: Although applicant has submitted an elevation of the ground floor level of the building that demonstrates a well designed street level – pedestrian experience, there seems to be missing amenities such as benches and/or street furniture which the plans call for, as well as, comments received from the DRB review. Applicant needs to add pedestrian-engaging street furniture, i.e. benches or seating areas. Are the colors shown in the elevations the finalized color scheme? If not, then applicant could allow more flexibility by submitting a traditional color palette. Applicant appears to have addressed the use of bicycle lockers with an appropriate amount of lockers that support potential multi-modal transportation opportunities. However, as project moves along, applicant is encourage to look for additional appropriate and potential spaces in the garage for such lockers and bicycle racks. It should be noted that the number of bicycle parking spaces identified in General Notes section on sheet 1 of 4, is in conflict with what is shown on sheet 2 of 4. Sheet 2 identifies 4 – Class 1 spaces, and 8 Class - II spaces. Please correct General Notes section on sheet 1 of 4. Tree plantings 5’ o.c. is not acceptable. Minimum distance between trees needs to be 12’ – 15’, depending on species, canopy span in urban areas can range from 25’ – 45’. Please address. Paving pattern and material should be addressed by Design review Committee. Preference is to maintain current species/specimens of Quercus virginiana as indicated in the Tucson Downtown Comprehensive Street Tree Plan (WRT 1998). If another species is to be selected, they should be Sonoran or other desert plants as recommended in the Draft Congress Street Master Plan (Wheat Scharf 2005). Provide rezoning conditions on the Development Plan General Notes Section. |
| 11/22/2006 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES November 22, 2006 David Little The WLB Group, Inc 4444 East Broadway Blvd. Tucson, Arizona 85711 Subject: S06-182 The PostTentative Plat Dear David: Your submittal of October 27, 2006 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a DETAILED cover letter explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLACKLINES MUST BE FOLDED 6 Copies Revised Tentative Plat (Landscape, Zoning, Addressing, DUPD, Real Estate, DSD) 4 Copies Revised Landscape Plan (Landscape, Zoning, DUPD, DSD ) 2 Copies Color Elevations (DUPD, DSD) Once the rezoning conditions are adopted by the Mayor and Council, additional review agencies may need to see the revised plans. Please provide a copy of the rezoning conditions to the CDRC office once adopted. Should you have any questions, please call me at 791-5608 extension 1179. Sincerely, Patricia Gehlen CDRC Manager All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: 881-7492 Tp-resubmittal |
| 11/22/2006 | PGEHLEN1 | COT NON-DSD | REAL ESTATE | Denied | S06-182 The Post: Resubmittal - CDRC - Tentative Plat Review - Request the following: - Pg. 1 of 4, Item 1. The basement of the Indian Village Trading Post is referred to as "restaurant". Underground parking is proposed in this level. -Request confirmation from the AZ State Preservation Office confirming this development. |