Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Plan Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Plan Number - S06-182
Review Name: TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 08/11/2006 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 08/15/2006 | JIM EGAN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | |
| 08/22/2006 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1) Per DS 9-05.4.3.B, shade shall be provided for at least fifty (50) percent of all sidewalks and pedestrian pathways as measured at 2:00 p.m. on June 21 when the sun is 82° above the horizon (based on 32°N Latitude). provide shade calculations. 2) Landscaping plantings in right-of-way or MS&R areas must be approved by the City Engineer or designee and comply with the City Engineer's requirements on construction, irrigation, location, and plant type. Provide verification, in writing, of any approvals obtained. Contact Gary Wittwer, DOT Landscape Architect for specific requirements. Approval of the plans by the Landscape section will be conditioned upon City Engineer approval and approval in accordance with the Administrative Design Review Procedures, 23A-32. 3) Gated openings of refuse enclosures are required to meet the screening standards of LUC Table 3.7.2-I. Include details or other information regarding refuse screening. 4) Revise the development plan to identify new planting areas and tree grates. DS 2-05.2.4.X 5) Revise the landscape plan to show, parking, loading areas, and the planter located near the pull-out area shown on the development plan. 6) Trees with the potential for overhanging a walkway, driveway, bicycle path, parking space, or street must be of a type that, at maturity, provides a canopy with an understory height clearance of eight (8) feet for walkways and bicycle paths, twelve (12) feet for driveways and streets, and fifteen (15) feet for loading spaces. Revise the plans as necessary and add notes regarding required maintenance for the height clearance. 7) All plant material used for landscaping shall be selected from the Drought Tolerant Plant List in Development Standard 9-06. Plants proposed in the public right-of-way must comply with the requirements of Sec. 3.7.2.2. 8) Provide details for the proposed fence. DS 2-07.2.2.D 9) If the landscaping design includes placement of screen wall, fencing, parking, or other similar improvements within the right-of-way, application for a Temporary Revocable Easement (TRE) with the City's Real Estate Division is required. If such use is approved, an annual fee is charged. DS2-06.2.2.M |
| 08/22/2006 | TOM MARTINEZ | OTHER AGENCIES | AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION | Approved | NO COMMENT S06-182 THE WLB GROUP, INC. THE POST -------------------------------------------------------- Confidentiality and Nondisclosure Notice: This email transmission and any attachments are intended for use by the person(s)/entity(ies) named above and may contain confidential/privileged information. Any unauthorized use, disclosure or distribution is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by e-mail, and delete or destroy all copies plus attachments. |
| 08/24/2006 | LIZA CASTILLO | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Approved | 4350 E. Irvington Road, Tucson, AZ 85714 Post Office Box 711, Tucson, AZ 85702 WR#167787 August 23, 2006 The WLB Group, Inc. Attn: David Little 4444 E Broadway Blvd Tucson, Arizona 85711 Dear Mr. David Little : SUBJECT: 26-72 E Broadway S06-182 Tucson Electric Power Company has reviewed and approved the development plan submitted August 11, 2006. It appears that there are no conflicts with the existing facilities within the boundaries of this proposed development. Enclosed is a copy of a TEP facilities map showing the approximate location of the existing facilities. In order to apply for electric service, call the New Construction Department at (520) 918-8300. Submit a final set of plans including approved site, offsite and electrical load plans. Include a CD with the AutoCAD version of the plans. If easements are required, they will be secured by separate instrument. Your final plans should be sent to: Tucson Electric Power Company Attn: Ms. Mary Boice New Business Project Manager P. O. Box 711 (DB-101) Tucson, AZ 85702 520-917-8732 Please call the area Designer Mike Kaiser at (520) 918-8244, should you have any questions. Sincerely, Elizabeth Miranda Office Support Specialist Design/Build kc Enclosures cc: David Little, City of Tucson Mike Kaiser, Tucson Electric Power |
| 08/24/2006 | JCLARK3 | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Approved | * No known landfill with in 1000 feet of this development. * Loft type residential homes. * Approved for a metal dumpster on casters to be serviced at curbside. |
| 08/28/2006 | FRODRIG2 | OTHER AGENCIES | PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS | Approved | Transportation Information for Rezoning, Subdivision, and Development Requests Delivered to: Date Delivered: Development Services - City of Tucson 8/22/2006 Case Number Project Name Average number of daily trips (ADT) forecasted as a result of the proposed development This information is provided for jurisdictional planning departments to assess the impact of the proposed residential or commercial development on surrounding traffic patterns and roads. If the forecasted daily traffic exceeds 500 average daily trips, a more detailed analysis is also provided. S06-182 The Post 275 Pima Association of Governments Sandra C. Holland, Data Services 177 N. Church Ave., Suite 405, Tucson, Arizona 85701-1127 (520) 792-1093 FAX (520) 620-6981 |
| 08/28/2006 | JOSE ORTIZ | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Denied | August 28, 2006 ACTIVITY NUMBER: S06-182 PROJECT NAME: The Post PROJECT ADDRESS: 30 E. Congress St. PROJECT REVIEWER: Jose E. Ortiz PE, Traffic Engineer Resubmittal Required: Traffic Engineering does not recommend approval of the Tentative Plat; therefore a revised Tentative Plat and Traffic Statement are required for re-submittal. The following items must be revised or added to the plat. 1. Include a response letter with the next submittal that states how all comments have been addressed. 2. List the name, ROW width, recordation data, type and dimensioned width of paving, curbs, curb cuts and sidewalks. (DS 2-03.2.3.D) 3. Show and label the pedestrian sight visibility triangle (SVT) to the west of the driveway entrance, and provide dimensions to the SVT's east of the entrance. 4. Provide all driveway dimensions and follow the Tucson City Code Chapter 25 Section 38 which states that the maximum driveway width is 20' and for adjoining properties is 30' (residential district) 5. The 'ROCK BAMBOO PLANTER' will be in conflict with vehicles backing into the proposed pullout area. Please revise the planter configuration to ensure that motorists can utilize the pullout area. 6. Display the limits of work in public the right of way. 7. A revised Traffic Statement was not received with this submittal. Please provide a revised Traffic Statement with the next submittal. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-4259 x305 or Jose.Ortiz@tucsonaz.gov |
| 08/31/2006 | KAROL ARAGONEZ | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Karol Aragonez Planner PROJECT: S06-182 The Post Development Plan/Tentative Plat TRANSMITTAL DATE: August 11, 2006 DUE DATE: September 7, 2006 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. This review did not address potential rezoning conditions that might be applicable to C9-06-25. Additional comments may result once rezoning is approved. 1. Section 5.3.8.2, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a development plan. If, at the end of that time, the development plan has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this development plan is August 10, 2007. 2. The project location map is too cluttered when showing all lots and street rights-of-way. Please remove all lot lines to de-clutter map. DS 2-03.2.1.D 3. Please provide in the title block the number of proposed units being provided as residential and retail space. Also provide the number of units in the general notes. DS 2-03.2.1.G.2 & DS 2-03.2.2.B.4 4. Please add a north arrow, contour interval, and scale placed together on each sheet , preferably in the upper right corner of the plat. DS 2-03.2.1.H 5. Subdivision case number S06-182 has been assigned to this project. Please place the case number and the rezoning case number C9-06-25 in the lower right corner of the plat on all sheets. DS 2-03.2.2.B.1 6. In general note 2 please correct C1 to "C-1". DS 2-03.2.2.B.2 7. Once the zoning variances (MDR) have been approved add a note identifying by case number the variances or modifications that are applicable to the project. This is to be added to the lower right corner of all sheets of the tentative plat, landscape plan, NPPO, and other applicable plans. DS 2-03.2.2.B.6 8. Please add to general note 27 compliance to Rio Nuevo and Downtown Zone. DS 2-03.2.2.B.7 9. Please add note "Total miles of new public streets are zero (0), Total miles of new private streets are zero (0). DS 2-03.2.2.D.1.b 10. Please draw all existing easements on the plan along with recordation information, location, width, and purpose. If an easement is no longer in use and scheduled to be vacated or has been abandoned, so indicate. If none exist provide response to reviewer's comments. Also if easements are purposed please draw, dimension and label as to their purpose and whether they will be public or private. If none exist provide response to reviewer's comments. DS 2-05.2.3.B & DS 2-05.2.4.G 11. Please label existing and proposed locations of six (6) inch vertical curbing used along Congress and Scott. Provide the recordation information for both streets. Dimension sidewalk area along Scott. DS 2-05.2.3.D 12. Please identify, label, and dimension areas that are common elements and those that will be limited common elements for the residential portion of the project. These should be labeled with a separate letter designation, enclosing those areas with a solid line to identify separate restrictions, a separate owner's association. DS 2-03.2.4.C 13. Please provide a copy of the CC&Rs for staff's review. 14. Please provide calculations for required FAR (10.5 max.) for the retail/commercial and residential use, and site coverage calculations for site coverage (80% max.) required for residential use for the first floor entrance. 15. Please dimension all PAALs within the parking garage and access ramps in and out. Minimum two-way PAAL is twenty (24) feet wide, one-way is twelve (12). DS 3-05.2.1.C.1 16. If there are vertical barriers within the garage that over six (6) inches in height parking spaces abutting them must be widened to ten (10) feet to provide extra width to allow passengers to enter and exit the vehicles on the side the barrier exists. Please indicate and dimension which, if any parking spaces are to be ten (10) feet on the DP/TP. DS 3-05.2.1.B.3 17. Required motor vehicle parking is based the downtown redevelopment district. All uses (retail/commercial) other than office require one space per three hundred (300) square feet of GFA (28 required). Residential requires one space per bedroom (47 required). Parking currently shown on the DP/TP is for forty-seven (47) motor vehicle parking spaces for the residential use. Staff recognizes that a MDR is being processed for a parking variance for the retail uses of twenty-eight (28) spaces. Tandem parking shown for spaces 37-40 cannot be counted toward required parking unless it meets the criteria as described in LUC Sec. 3.3.7.6 LUC 3.3.6 18. A back-up spur is required at the end of a row of parking if no ingress/egress is provided at the end. A minimum distance of three (3) feet will be provided between the back of spur and any wall. If the last space is wider than eight and one-half (8 ½) feet, the Traffic Engineer can reduce the back-up spur in size, subject to approval. DS 3-05.2.2.D 19. Please provide a detail of both Class 1 and Class 2 bicycle parking spaces. Per DS 2-09.4.1 Class 2 bicycle parking facilities will be located no more than fifty (50) feet from the main building entrance(s) and will be along the front side of the building as well as along other sides of the building that has an entrance. Bicycle access through the development will be separate from the pedestrian ways. Vehicular access may be used as bicycle access. Bicycle access to a parking facility may cross a pedestrian way at a right angle (DS2-09.3.2). Multiple rack bicycle parking require a minimum thirty (30 inches between outer spaces of posts or racks (DS 2-09.5.1.A). Please review the revised DS 2-09 and provide the necessary corrections to the bicycle parking as required. Once changes are provided and reviewed further comments may result. The revised DS may be found on the web at: http://www.tucsonaz.gov/dsd/Codes___Ordinances/DevStd209.pdf DS 2-09.0 20. Please dimension all pedestrian paths/sidewalks on site. Sidewalk shown on south side of structure must be a minimum of four (4) feet in width. Minimum sidewalk area along a MS&R right-of-way is six (6) feet. Please dimension sidewalk area within Congress and Scott from the edge of planters, bike racks and other physical obstacles to assure minimums are maintained DS 2-08.5.1.A 21. Please show the required signage location for handicap parking spaces and provide a detail of such signage per TDOT requirements. Height placement of signage is to be seven (7) feet from the bottom of the sign to the garage grade. TDOT 22. Detectable warnings (truncated domes) are required at marked crossings (crosswalks within parking garage). The area covered by the truncated domes shall be twenty-four (24) inch deep and extend the full width of the crosswalk, preceding the crosswalk, including the handicap access aisle. ANSI 406.12 23. On the drawing label the heights and dimensions of all structures within project scope. DS 2-05.2.4.N 24. Off-street loading and on-street parking are shown being within the sight visibility triangle. Line of sight will not be obscured between thirty (30) inches and six (6) feet through a triangular area adjacent to the driveway. DS 3-01.5.1.A.1 25. Off-street loading spaces for retail and commercial services are to be twelve (12) feet wide by thirty-five (35) feet long and have an overhead clearance of fifteen (15) feet. Spaces are also to be located on site with all maneuvering accomplished on site as well. Staff recognizes that a MDR is being processed for a variance to the off-street loading requirements. LUC 3.4.5.3 table 3 26. Please clarify the use of the eight (8) foot by twenty-four (24) pull out space At the entrance to the garage. 27. Refuse collection is indicated on the plan as being provided by private service. Provisions for on-site collection and maneuvering to avoid on-street traffic and pedestrian conflicts are required. The design of the collection site and how the trash is picked-up must comply with DS 6-01.0. Deviation from these standards must be approved through a development standard modification (DSMR) prior to DP/TP approval. DS 2-05.2.4.T & DS 6-01.0 28. Once approved indicate graphically, where possible, and by notes compliance with conditions of rezoning (C9(-06-25). A separate response letter is to be provided detailing compliance with rezoning conditions. DS 2-05.2.4.U 29. Indicate the locations and types of proposed signage to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements and that minimal locational requirements are met. DS 2-05.2.4.W 30. Joint use of the wall abutting the project site on Federal government property cannot be approved unless a joint use agreement is signed between property owners to assure the wall will remain and be in good repair. Please provide a copy of the signed and notarized agreement prior to DP/TP approval. 31. Development within the Rio Nuevo and Downtown (RND) Zone shall meet the design principles set forth in Sec. 2.8.10.1 by complying with the following Design Criteria (see Development Standards 9-10.0, 10-02.0, 10-03.0, and 10-05.0). All criteria must be demonstrated either on the plan or as a supplement to the DP/TP explaining how compliance was met. A. The proposed buildings should respect the scale of those buildings located in the development zone and serve as an orderly transition to a different scale. Building heights with a vastly different scale than those on adjacent properties should have a transition in scale to reduce and mitigate potential impacts. In areas undergoing change, long-range plans should be consulted for guidance as to appropriate heights. B. All new construction shall maintain the prevailing setback existing within its development zone. C. All new construction shall provide scale-defining architectural elements or details at the first two floor levels, such as windows, spandrels, awnings, porticos, cornices, pilasters, columns, and balconies. D. Every commercial building frontage shall provide windows, window displays, or visible activity within and adjacent to the building at the ground floor level, with a minimum of fifty (50) percent of the building frontage providing such features. E. A single plane of a façade at the street level may not be longer than fifty (50) feet without architectural relief or articulation. F. Building façade design shall include pedestrian-scaled, down-shielded, and glare-controlled exterior building and window lighting. G. The front doors of all commercial and government buildings shall be visible from the street and visually highlighted by graphics, lighting, marquees, or canopies. H. Modifications to the exterior of historic buildings shall complement the overall historic context of the Downtown and respect the architectural integrity of the historic façade. I. Buildings shall be designed to shield adjacent buildings and public rights-of-way from reflected heat and glare. J. Safe and adequate vehicular parking areas designed to minimize conflicts with pedestrians and bicycles shall be provided. K. Adequate shade shall be provided for sidewalks and pedestrian pathways, using shade structures or vegetation, where permitted by the City of Tucson. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Karol Aragonez, (520) 791-5550. KAA C:\planning\cdrc\tentativeplat\S06-182tp.doc RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development plan/ tentative plat, CC&R's and additional requested documents. |
| 09/06/2006 | KAY MARKS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Denied | 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 KAY MARKS ADDRESSING OFFICIAL PH: 740-6480 FAX #: 740-6370 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL SUBJECT: S06-182 THE POST/TENTATIVE PLAT DATE: 9/06/06 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and the following matters must be resolved prior to our approval: Include brief legal description in Title Block that includes: Subdivision, Block, lots, recorded book and page. Include unit numbers to be platted in Title Block. Correct parcels 112-12-0850, 084A, 083A and 0820 to 117-12-0850, 084A, 083A and 0820. Label Condominium Unit Numbers per Pima County Policy (2nd floor=200 series. 3rd floor=300 series, etc). Delete 26-72 E. Broadway from Sheet 1. Addressing will be assigned upon approval of project. es |
| 09/06/2006 | MATT FLICK | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | DATE: September 6, 2006 TO: Patricia Gehlen Zoning Manager FROM: Matt Flick, P.E. Engineering Manager SUBJECT: S06-182 The Post RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Tentative Plat Drainage Statement The Post site lies along the south side of Congress Street between Stone Avenue and Scott Avenue. The site does not lie within a designated balanced or critical basin; detention is not required. The site area is less than one acre, has been previously developed and the site soils are compacted fill in the existing condition; threshold retention is not required. The site does not lie within a FEMA- or COT-designated floodplain. Since the site does not require detention/retention and is not affected by flow from a significant watercourse, a drainage statement is required. The following comments are offered: 1. The drainage statement should be prepared in accordance with Section 2.1.3 of the Standards Manual for Drainage Design and Floodplain Management (Dev. Std. 10-02). 2. Insufficient existing and proposed elevations are shown for the driveway and Congress Street in the vicinity of the driveway. Provide sufficient elevations to indicate roadway and driveway slopes and to determine drainage patterns. 3. Indicate height and standard detail of proposed new vertical curb to be installed within Congress Street east and west of the proposed driveway. 4. Provide further detail on the Type 2 scupper to be placed across the driveway entrance. Typically, a steel plate is placed over the scupper; these plates are not, in general, traffic-loaded. What will be used to cover the scupper? 5. Show label and dimension the pedestrian sight visibility triangle west of the driveway entrance and dimension the SVT east of the entrance. 6. Label the right-of-way width, street width, curb height and recordation data for all adjacent streets. 7. Dimension all sidewalks. 8. Label and dimension the PAALs, including the ramp and those in the parking garage. 9. Back-up spurs are required at the end of the parking rows within the garage. 10. Clearly label and dimension common elements and identify those that will be limited common elements. 11. Indicate where dumpsters are to be placed for pickup. 12. Indicate number of units, both commercial and residential, in the title block. |
| 09/07/2006 | FRODRIG2 | COT NON-DSD | REAL ESTATE | Denied | S06-182 The Post: Tentative Plat Review - The following items are requested: -Request any update to title report, 1/16/03, Fidelity National Title Agency, No. 60009242-SJ-B. -Dkt./Pg. 12683/4584, Quit Claim Deed, rcd. 11/18/05, prohibits any changes/construction to the Indian Village Trading Post (Bldg. "F") unless permission is provided from the AZ State Preservation Office. No reference is found concerning any response from the AZ State Preservation Office. Request additional information concerning the proposed improvements for parking, retail and residence within this building. -Page 1 of 3. The drawing of the horizontal portrayal does not show Indian Village Trading Post as part of the this project. -Page 1 of 3. Item #19, Real Estate Division has no knowledge of the number wastewater fixtures. Request clarification. |
| 09/07/2006 | ED ABRIGO | PIMA COUNTY | ASSESSOR | Approved | Office of the Pima County Assessor 115 N. Church Ave. Tucson, Arizona 85701 BILL STAPLES ASSESSOR TO: CDRC Office Subdivision Review City of Tucson (FAX# 791-5559 FROM: Gary Ault, Mapping Supervisor Pima County Assessor's Office Mapping Department DATE: September 7, 2006 RE: Assessor's Review and Comments Regarding Tentative Plat S06-182 THE POST T141312 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * X Plat meets Assessor's Office requirements. _______ Plat does not meet Assessor's Office requirements. COMMENTS: THERE WAS SOME CONFUSION REGARDING THE TENTATIVE PLAT. IT SEEMED TO BE STRICTLY A DEVELOPMENT PLAN. IF IT IS A CONDOMINIUM PROJECT IT SHOULD HAVE THE NUMBER OF UNITS IN THE TITLE BLOCK AND ALSO THE BOUNDARIES FOR SAME. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS PLEASE CALL ROSANNA WERNER AT 740-4390. NOTE: THE ASSESSOR'S CURRENT INVOLVEMENT IN PROCESSING ITS MANUAL MAPS TO DIGITAL FORMAT IS EXPEDITED GREATLY BY EXCHANGE OF DIGITAL DATA. IN THE COURSE OF RECORDING THIS SUBDIVISION YOUR ASSISTANCE IN PROVIDING THIS OFFICE WITH AN AUTOCAD COPY WOULD BE GREATLY APPRECIATED. THANK YOU FOR ANY DIGITAL DATA PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED. ROSANNA WERNER |
| 09/07/2006 | GLENN HICKS | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Approved | DATE: September 07, 2006 TO: Ferne Rodriguez, Development Services FROM: Glenn Hicks Parks and Recreation 791-4873 ext. 215 Glenn.Hicks@tucsonaz.gov CC: SUBJECT: S06-182 The Post: Tentative Plat Review Staff has no comments. |
| 09/07/2006 | ROGER HOWLETT | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Denied | DEPARTMENT OF URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT S06-182 The Post 09/06/06 ( X ) Tentative Plat ( X ) Development Plan ( X ) Landscape Plan () Revised Plan/Plat () Board of Adjustment () Other CROSS REFERENCE: C9-06-25 NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: El Centro Redevelopment Plan GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: COMMENTS DUE BY: September 7, 2006 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: () No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment () Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions () RCP Proposal Complies With Plan Policies ( X ) See Additional Comments Attached () No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: ( X ) Resubmittal Required: ( X ) Tentative Plat ( X ) Development Plan ( X ) Landscape Plan ( X ) Other – Elevations of Pedestrian Street Level REVIEWER: JBeall 791-4505 DATE: 9/5/06 It should be noted that the Post project has concurrently submitted an application for development review and rezoning. Hence this development is being reviewed without those rezoning comments and any review comments are conditional until such rezoning comments are completed and reviewed. The applicant will need to submit the following: Applicant needs to submit an elevation of the ground floor level of the building that demonstrates a well designed street level – pedestrian experience, i.e. landscaping, design elements, amenities (benches, shading) which the plans call for, as well as, comments received from the DRB review. Applicant should provide a color palette too. Applicant needs to address the use of bicycle lockers with an appropriate amount of lockers that support potential multi-modal transportation opportunities. There appears to be appropriate and potential spaces in the garage for such lockers and bicycle racks. Applicant needs to provide a more detailed elevation of the north and south building facades which depicts colors, design details, proposed balconies, design elements that integrate with adjacent building. Urban Planning and Design reserves the right for additional development review comments upon completion of the rezoning review process and any subsequent rezoning comments. |
| 09/07/2006 | FRODRIG2 | TUCSON WATER NEW AREA DEVELOPMENT | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 09/08/2006 | PGEHLEN1 | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Denied | Comments will be posted on September 12, 2006 |
| 09/08/2006 | PGEHLEN1 | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Denied | September 11, 2006 TO: David Little, P.E. The WLB Group THRU: Patricia Ghelen City of Tucson, Development Services Department FROM: Chandubhai C. patel, P.E. Pima County Development Services Department Development Review Division (Wastewater) SUBJECT: The Post Condominiums Development Plant/Tentative Plat – 1st Submittal SO6-182 The proposed sewer collection lines to serve the above-referenced project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use. This project is tributary to the Santa Cruz Central interceptor and Roger Road WWTF. Provide a letter from the PCWMD Development Services, written within the past 90 days, stating that treatment and conveyance system capacity for this project is available. A capacity request form may be found at http://www.pima.gov/wwm/forms/docs/CapResponseRequest.pdf. ALL SHEETS. Add the project number, SO6-182, to the title block of each sheet. This number should be shown larger or bolder than any cross-reference numbers. Based on the evaluation of the proposed sewer design, this project qualifies for Standard sewer connection fee rates. SHEET 1. Add a note that reads: A project construction permit must be secured from the Pima County Wastewater Management Department before beginning any work on this project. SHEET 1. Add in the Legend a symbol for proposed or new HCS , and clarify that the symbol already shown there for HCS is for existing HCS. SHEET 2. Show the Pima County IMS numbers for the existing manholes on the upstream and downstream sides of the HCS’ connection points to the existing 8-inch sewer line. Also show the rim and invert elevations for these manholes.. SHEET 2. Where the HCS’ lines are shown, show the proposed part and the existing part of the lines distinctly using different (drafting) line types. These line types should be the same as those used in the legend for existing and proposed HCS. SHEET 2. Show the same (drafting) line type for the existing sewer and manhole as that used in the legend. SHEET 1. Revise note no. 19 to read: This project will have ----existing and ----proposed wastewater fixture unit equivalents per Table 13.20.045(E) in Pima County Code 13.20.045(E). Also fill in the blanks as appropriate. We will require a revised set of drawings and a response letter addressing each comment. Additional comments may be made during the review of these documents. The next submittal of this project will be the 2nd submittal. A check for the review fee of this submittal in the amount of $100.00 made out to PIMA COUNTY TREASURER must accompany the revised set of bluelines and response letter. For any questions regarding the fee schedule, please go to http://www.pimaxpress.com/SubDivision/Documents/Fees.PDF where you may find the appropriate wastewater review fees at the bottom of page 1. If the number of sheets changes, please adjust the review fee accordingly. If you have any questions regarding the above mentioned comments, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, Chandubhai C. Patel, P.E. Telephone: (520) 740-6563 Copy: Project file |
| 09/08/2006 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES September 8, 2006 David Little The WLB Group, Inc 4444 East Broadway Blvd. Tucson, Arizona 85711 Subject: S06-182 The PostTentative Plat Dear David: Your submittal of August 11, 2006 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a DETAILED cover letter explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLACKLINES MUST BE FOLDED 9 Copies Revised Tentative Plat (Landscape, Traffic, Zoning, Engineering, Addressing, DUPD, Real Estate, Wastewater, DSD) 5 Copies Revised Landscape Plan (Landscape, Zoning, Engineering, DUPD, DSD ) 2 Copies Revised Drainage Statement (Engineering, DSD) 3 Copies Color Elevations (DUPD, Zoning, DSD) 2 Copies Title Report (Real Estate, DSD) Please note that Pima County Wastewater will post comments on Tuesday September 12, 2006. In addition, once the rezoning conditions are adopted by the Mayor and Council, additional review agencies may need to see the revised plans. Should you have any questions, please call me at 791-5608 extension 1179. Sincerely, Patricia Gehlen CDRC Manager All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: 881-7492 Tp-resubmittal |