Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you cannot find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Plan Review Detail

Plan Number: S06-144
Parcel: Unknown

Address:
8700 E ARBOR ST

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW

Plan Number - S06-144
Review Name: TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
06/22/2006 FERNE RODRIGUEZ START PLANS SUBMITTED Completed
06/26/2006 JIM EGAN COT NON-DSD FIRE Approved
06/30/2006 TOM MARTINEZ OTHER AGENCIES AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION Approved NO COMMENT
S06-144
RICK ENGINEERING COMPANY
OASIS GOLF LINKS

--------------------------------------------------------


Confidentiality and Nondisclosure Notice: This email transmission and any attachments are intended for use by the person(s)/entity(ies) named above and may contain confidential/privileged information. Any unauthorized use, disclosure or distribution is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by e-mail, and delete or destroy all copies plus attachments.
07/12/2006 JCLARK3 ENV SVCS REVIEW Denied * No known landfill with in 1000 feet of this development.
* Lots 19-21 d0 not have direct frontage on the Private Street. Need to specify where their refuse will be picked up off the private street. Verbiage needs to be put in the projects CC&R's so stating where the location of the service. Location needs to be shown on the plans.
07/13/2006 PETER MCLAUGHLIN LANDSCAPE REVIEW Denied 1) Add the subdivision case number (S06-144) to the lower right hand corner of all sheets of the Plat, Landscape Plan and NPPO Plan.
DS 2-03.2.2.B.1

2) The minimum required text size is 12 point (0.12") for microfilming/archiving purposes. Revise lettering in the location maps on both the Landscape and NPP plan as well as the lot number in the key map on landscape plan sheet 1 of 6. Also, enlarge the text size in the lower right hand corner on the aerial photo of the NPP plan which identifies the type and location of the existing native plants. Note: Due to the dark background caused by vegetation in this portion of the aerial photo, position these native plant labels where they will be more easily legible (over a lighter background) and place an arrow drawn from the labels to the plant locations.
DS 2-03.2.1.C

3) Canopy trees must be evenly distributed throughout the vehicular use area. Every parking space shall be located within forty (40) feet of the trunk of a canopy tree (as measured from the center of the tree trunk). Show required canopy trees within the two parking lot planter islands.
LUC 3.7.2.3.A.1.a

4) Dimension on the landscape plan the width and length of all landscape areas, including parking lot planter areas. An unpaved planting area, which is a minimum of thirty (34) square feet in area and four (4) feet in width, must be provided for each canopy tree.
LUC 3.7.2.3.A.1.c
DS 2-07.2.2.A.2

5) Revise the legal description in the title blocks on all sheets of the landscape and NPP plan to indicate that the project site is also a portion of the northwest corner of Section 27, T14 S. R15 E.
DS 2-07.

6) A 5-foot screen is required to screen the parking lot areas from the adjacent local and collector streets. Label all screening on the landscape plan. The required screen may not be placed inside the sight-visibility triangles. Table 3.7.2-I
LUC 3.7.2.8 & DS 2-06.3.7.B.1

7) Add a cross section detail of the drainage channel/basin. Indicate its slope ratios, depth and area per DS 2-07.2.2.B.5. Add the bottom and top elevations for basin #1 to the label on tentative plat sheet 2 of 3.

8) Indicate the methods by which water harvesting/ storm runoff is used to benefit lanting areas on the site.
LUC 3.7.4.3.B


RESUBMITTAL OF ALL PLANS IS REQUIRED.
07/18/2006 FRODRIG2 PIMA COUNTY WASTEWATER Denied July 17, 2006

To: Chuck Martin, Rick Engineering

Thru: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Project Manager
City of Tucson Development Services Department

____________________________________
From: Michael J. Harrington (520-740-6579), representing the Pima County
Departments of Wastewater Management and Environmental Quality

Subject: Oasis - Golf Links
Lots 1-43
& Common Area "A-1" & "B-1" thu "B-2" & "C-1" thru "C-2" & "D-1" thru "D-4"
Tentative or Preliminary Plat - 1st Submittal
S06-144

The proposed sewer collection lines for the above-referenced project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use.


This project will be tributary both the Ina Road Water Pollution Control Facility and the Roger Road Wastewater Treatment Facility via the Pantano Interceptor. Obtain a letter from the PCWMD's Development Services Section, written within the past 90 days, stating that treatment and conveyance system capacities for the project is available in the downstream public sewerage system and provide a copy of that letter to this office. The required form to request such a letter may be found at:

http://www.pima.gov/wwm/forms/docs/CapResponseRequest.pdf.

The tentative plat for this project cannot be approved until this office has received a copy of this letter.

All Sheets: Add the subdivision case number, S06-144, to the title block of each sheet. This number should be shown larger or bolder than any cross-reference numbers. No wastewater review fees will be charged for sheets where this is the only required revision.

Sheet 1: Revise General Note#11 so that it states:

THE ON-SITE SANITARY SEWAGE COLLECTION LINES WILL BE PUBLIC AND DESIGNED AND CONSTRUCTED TO PIMA COUNTY WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT STANDARDS AND MUST BE ACCEPTED AND RELEASED FOR SERVICE BY THE PIMA COUNTY WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF SEWER CONNECTION PERMITS.
Sheet 1: The construction of the public sewer extension, in the adjacent Pantano Parkway rights of way, is not considered an off-site sewer. Delete General Note #13.

Sheet 2: Existing MH # 5 and #06. Revise the manhole labels so that:

The full IMS numbers for the existing manholes are provided. The IMS numbers (also called Hanson numbers) are the 6 digit numbers, for these manholes, that are found at the PCWMD Maps and Records Section basemaps and also on PCWMD and PCDOT MapGuide website pages.

And correct the sewer construction plan number at MH #06.

Sheet 2: Revise the label over the 15” UNSPECIFIED SEWER, or add to KEYNOTES, so that it states:

UNSPECIFIED SEWER, 15” OR 18” PER G-86-128 and/or D G-86-128A (Contractor shall verify pipe size and material)

Sheet 2: At proposed manhole #1. Construction over a large line sewer main (greater then 12”) may be difficult and flow management considerations are often costly. Also, from the Inverts provided it would appear that a drop manhole design is what you are proposing. Drop manholes in the PCWMD sewer system are currently being discouraged. Design approval through the PCWMD Engineering Section will be required. See Engineering Directive ENG2006-09 Flow Management Considerations During Design, for further information. Revise the site plan so that:

The Invert of the existing sewer (G-86-128A) is provided at the proposed manhole #1.

Sheet 2: The proposed 8” public sewer extension, between manholes #1 and #2 , will be crossed by a 4 section, 24” HDPE pipe drainage culvert structure. Revise the site plan so that:

The invert elevations of the 24” HDPE are provided at the location of the sewer line crossing.

This office will require a revised set of bluelines, and a response letter, addressing these comments. Additional comments may be made during the review of these documents.

Pima County Code Title 13.20.030.A.2 requires that a wastewater review fee be paid for each submittal of the final plat. The fee for the first submittal is $166 plus $50 per sheet. For the second submittal, the review fee is $50 per sheet. For all subsequent submittals, the review fee is $39 per sheet.

The next submittal of this project will be the second (2nd) submittal. A check for the review fee of this submittal in the amount of $100.00 (made out to PIMA COUNTY TREASURER) must accompany the revised set of bluelines and response letter.

If the number of sheets changes, please adjust the review fee accordingly.


If you have any questions regarding the above mentioned comments, please contact me at the telephone number shown under my signature on the first page of this letter

CC: Project File
07/18/2006 JOSE ORTIZ COT NON-DSD TRAFFIC Denied July 18, 2006
ACTIVITY NUMBER: S06-144
PROJECT NAME: Oasis Golf Links
PROJECT ADDRESS: 8700 E Arbor St
PROJECT REVIEWER: Jose E. Ortiz PE, Traffic Engineer

Resubmittal Required: Traffic Engineering does not recommend approval of the Tentative Plat; therefore a revised Tentative Plat is required for resubmittal.

The following items must be revised or added to the plat.

1. Include a response letter with the next submittal that states how all comments have been addressed.

2. List the name, ROW width, recordation data, type and dimensioned with of paving, curbs, curb cuts and sidewalks. (DS 2-03.2.3.D)

3. Provide 18' curb returns at Pantano Parkway and the private street.


If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-4259 x305 or Jose.Ortiz@tucsonaz.gov
07/18/2006 RICHARD WILLIAMSON TUCSON WATER NEW AREA DEVELOPMENT REVIEW Approv-Cond WATER SUPPLY
Tucson Water has been designated by the State of Arizona, Department of Water Resources, as having an assured water supply. This does not mean that water service is currently available to the proposed development. This development lies within the exterior boundary of Tucson Water's planned 50-year service area. Therefore, water supply is assured.

WATER SERVICE
The approval of water meter applications is subject to the availability of water service at the time an application is made. The developer shall be required to submit a water master plan identifying but not limited to:

Water Use
Fire Flow Requirements
Offsite / Onsite Water Facilities
Loops and Proposed Connection Points to Existing Water System
Easements / Common Areas

Any specific area plan fees, protected main / facility fees and / or other needed facilities' cost are to be paid by the developer.

If the existing water system is not capable of meeting the requirements of the proposed development, the developer shall be fiscally responsible for modifying/enhancing the existing water system to meet those needs.

This letter shall be null and void one year from the date of issuance.

Issuance of this letter is not to be construed as agency approval of a water plan or as containing construction review comments relative to conflicts with existing water lines and the proposed development.

If you have any questions, please call New Development at 791-4718.

Sincerely,



Richard S. Williamson, P.E.
Manager, New Development
RW:bjh
07/19/2006 LIZA CASTILLO UTILITIES TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER Approved SUBJECT: OASIS GOLF LINKS
Lots 1- 43
S06-144

Tucson Electric Power Company (TEP) has no objection to the preliminary
plat submitted for review on June 22, 2006.

The preliminary point where TEP can possibly serve this project is from
pole #7 using road right-of-way or from the J2 (PHIP-2). Enclosed is a
copy of TEP's facility map showing the approximate location and unit
numbers of the existing facilities. A tentative plat showing where TEP
will be placing the aboveground equipment for this subdivision will be
sent under separate cover.

TEP will provide a preliminary electrical design on the Approved
Tentative Plat within fifteen (15) working days upon receipt of the
plat. Additional plans necessary for preparation of the design are:
building plans including water, electrical, landscape, sidewalk and
paving plans. Also, submit the AutoCAD version of the plat on a CD or
email to kclark@tep.com <mailto:lcastillo@tep.com> . Should you have
any questions, please contact the Designer for this project Frank
Kilpatrick at (520) 918-8227.


Sincerely,



Kathy Clark
Scheduling Coordinator
Design/Build
kc
Enclosures
cc: P. Gehlen, City of Tucson
J. Campbell, Oasis Tucson, Inc. (Letter only)
F. Kilpatrick, Tucson Electric Power


Kathy Clark
Scheduling Coordinator
Design/Build
520-918-8271
kclark@tep.com
07/20/2006 FRODRIG2 OTHER AGENCIES PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS Approved ESTIMATED DAILY TRIPS - 412
07/20/2006 FRODRIG2 COT NON-DSD REAL ESTATE Denied S06-144 Oasis Golg Links: Tentative Plat Review - No title report provided. 1' No Vehicle Access Easement be considered along N. boundary & aloong the boundary lines of C.A. B-1 & C.A. B-2.
07/20/2006 KAY MARKS PIMA COUNTY ADDRESSING Approved 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL
TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207

KAY MARKS
ADDRESSING OFFICIAL
PH: 740-6480
FAX #: 740-6370


TO: CITY PLANNING
FROM: KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL
SUBJECT: S06-144 OASIS GOLF LINKS/TENTATIVE PLAT
DATE: 7/20/06



The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and we hereby approve this project.

NOTE: ON FINAL PLAT:

Is Thu suppose to be thru on Title Blocks? Please correct.

2.) Label approved interior street names.



***The Pima County Addressing Section can use digital CAD drawing files when
submitted with your final plat Mylar. These CAD files can be submitted through the Pima
County Subdivision Coordinator. The digital CAD drawing files expedite the addressing
and permitting processes when we are able to insert this digital data into the County’s
Geographic Information System. Your support is greatly appreciated.***




es
08/10/2006 GLENN HICKS COT NON-DSD PARKS & RECREATION Approved DATE: August 09, 2006

TO: Ferne Rodriguez, Development Services

FROM: Glenn Hicks
Parks and Recreation
791-4873 ext. 215
Glenn.Hicks@tucsonaz.gov

CC:


SUBJECT: S06-144 Oasis Golf Links: Tentative Plat

Approved.
08/15/2006 LOREN MAKUS ENGINEERING REVIEW Denied DATE: August 18, 2006
To: Patricia Gehlen
CDRC/Zoning Manager
FROM: Loren Makus, EIT
Engineering Division

SUBJECT: Oasis-Golf Links
Tentative Plat S06-144 (First Review)
T14S, R15E, Section 27

RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Tentative Plat, Drainage Report
The Tentative Plat and Drainage Report have been reviewed by the Engineering Division and we do not recommend approval at this time. The following review comments must be addressed.

Tentative Plat Comments
1. Revise section detail B on sheet 3 to clarify that the street is common area and not public right-of-way.
2. Clarify section detail A on sheet 3 to indicate whether the street is proposed or existing.
3. Provide an appropriate knuckle design at the corners of the proposed private streets. The knuckles must provide sufficient radii for solid waste and fire access.
4. Provide dimensions on the sight visibility triangles.
5. Provide landing areas and truncated domes on the curb access ramps.
6. Provide dimensions for parking area access lanes for both parking areas. The PAALs must be at least 24 feet wide.
7. Clarify the basin top and bottom locations for both basins. Note also that the finish floor elevations for pads adjacent to the basins must be at least one foot above the expected water surface elevation. Confirm that lot 43 will comply with this requirement.
8. Provide dimensions and details for the new Pantano Parkway street construction. Show and label the proposed sidewalks.
9. The new private street must be at least 24 feet wide. Revise the plan and details to indicate the full required width.
10. Provide distance and bearing for each project boundary. The project boundaries do not seem to match the assessor's records. Provide documentation of City approval for all lot splits and recombinations, including any purchases of City property.
11. Provide details on the pipe across Pantano Parkway. The Pipe must either be RCP with a minimum diameter of 18 inches or an easement must be obtained.

Drainage Report Comments

12. Proofread the report. The text on the bottom of page 2 is partially repeated on the top of page 3. Other discontinuities occur throughout the report.
13. The area of the site is misstated in the site description. Revise the Drainage Report to agree with the Tentative Plat and the Assessor's Records.
14. Provide a discussion for how it was determined that the discharges from off-site drainage areas I and II do not affect the project site. The contours on the exhibits indicate that the site is expected to receive sheet flow from the adjacent properties.
15. Revise the Drainage Report section 4.2 to be consistent with the Floodplain Ordinance. Tucson Code section 26-7.1 indicates that the erosion hazard setback from the Pantano Wash is 50 feet where bank protection is provided. Provide substantiation that the bank protection is to the level of the base flood with appropriate freeboard.
16. Consider providing retention for this project within the Pantano Wash. Recharge is generally more effective within the sandy bottomed washes than from retention basins.
17. Note that the proposed pipe through the bank protection on the Pantano Wash will require the review and approval of the Pima County Flood Control District. Provide a letter from PCFCD accepting the general design of all drainage structures affecting the wash.

Submit a revised Tentative Plat and a revised Drainage Report. Include a detailed response letter, detailing how each comment has been addressed.
If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-5550 x1161 or loren.makus@tucsonaz.gov.

Loren Makus, EIT
Senior Engineering Associate
08/22/2006 TERRY STEVENS ZONING REVIEW Denied CDRC TRANSMITTAL

TO: Development Services Department
Plans Coordination Office

FROM: Terry Stevens
Lead Planner

PROJECT: S06-144
Oasis Golf Links
Tentative Plat

TRANSMITTAL: 08/22/06

DUE DATE: 7/21/06

COMMENTS:

1. Section 4.1.7.1, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a tentative plat. If, at the end of that time, the tentative plat has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this tentative plat is 7/20/07.

2. DS 2-03.2.2.B.1 This project has been assigned the subdivision case number S06-144. Please list the case number in the lower right corner of all tentative plat sheets including the NPPO and landscape sheets.

Please list the annexation case numbers (#C09-86-70 & #C9-87-18) in the lower right corner of all tentative plat sheets including the NPPO and landscape sheets.

The annexation case #C09-86-70, ordinance #6722, has restrictions regarding residential development. Zoning staff has had discussions with Glen Moyer and Michael McCrory regarding these conditions and will continue with the review based on the assumption that the conditions will be removed by Mayor and Council. Contact Glenn Moyer at 791-5640 ext. 1167 and Michael McCrory at 791-4221 for information regarding the process for removal of the conditions.

3. DS 2-03.2.2.7 Reference by note that this project is designed to meet the overlay zone criteria: LUC Sec. 3.6.1, Residential Cluster Project.

4. DS 2-03.2.2.8 Add the following note: "This subdivision is subject to Ordinance No.6722 and 8890 which established the zoning in the Golf Links / Harrison Annexation Area".

5. DS 2-03.2.4.A Assessors records indicate there has been recent lot splits and combinations regarding this parcel and the parcels to the north and south. Provide documentation verifying the City of Tucson has approved the lot split and combinations.
Provide the distance and bearings for the subdivision boundary lines. See engineering comments.

6. DS 2-03.2.4.G The proposed streets do not meet the requirements of DS 3-01 Figure 1. Minimum roadway width of 24' is required with an over all width of the right of way being 40'.

Provide dimension of all PAALs. Minimum required distance of 24' behind perpendicular parking spaces.

Radius curbs will be required at all PAAL to street intersections. Contact Loren Makus with engineering for further information.

Provide a detail with dimensions showing the required 3' curb radius, 3' clear space and minimum 24' width for backup spurs. See DS 3-05.2.2.D & Figure 2.

7. DS 2-10.3.1.A Clearly indicate that the required perimeter yard setback for the rear setback on lots 41, 40 and a portion of lot 39, which all abut lot 42 that has a zero setback, will be a minimum of 6'. Required as per LUC Sec. 3.6.1.4.D.2.d.3.

Instead of showing the perimeter yard setbacks for the boundary of the subdivision as 26', indicate the setback as the "height of structure".

Clearly indicate the required setback from Pantano Parkway. (21' or the height of structure from edge of nearest travel lane).

8. DS 2-10.3.1.B On the typical lot layout detail clearly indicate the required setbacks for garages as 18' from property line or 19' from back or sidewalk whichever is greater. See LUC Sec. 3.2.6.5.B.2.a.

9. DS 2-10.3.1.C The site coverage math calculations on page 1 of 3 appear to be incorrect. The correct coverage appears to be 63%.

The allowed maximum height of structure is indicated as 20' which is incorrect. The maximum height of a structure in a C1 zone RCP-9 is 25'. Please revise.

The proposed height of a structure is indicated as 20' maximum. The proposed setback for the subdivision boundary which is the height of the structure is indicated as 26'. Please clarify.

10. DS 2-10.3.1.D and LUC Sec. 3.6.1.4.A.5 The minimum number of units required to have barrier-free accessibility is 25% of the total number of units. Based on 43 units the number of required barrier-free accessibility units is 11. Note number 17 indicates that 8 units are being provided as barrier-free. Please revise.

11. DS 2-10.3.2.D On lots of four thousand (4,000) square feet or more, it will be assumed that the lot is of sufficient size to accommodate a dwelling unit; therefore, on projects with lots of this size, floor plans will not be required. However, on lots of less than four thousand (4,000) square feet, units have to be custom designed to fit onto these
smaller and tighter lots, and additional information is needed to verify compliance
with RCP requirements. Therefore, on projects that have lots less than four
thousand (4,000) square feet in size, submit:

1. Floor plans or drawings of the footprint of each unit, showing exterior dimensions. If only dimensioned building footprints are provided, be certain that locations of second floors (if applicable), front entrances, and motor vehicle parking spaces are noted. The floor plans can be preliminary plans and do not have to be complete construction drawings.

2. Building elevations of all proposed units with height dimensions. These assist in determining compliance with perimeter yard setbacks and screening of mechanical equipment. The elevations can be preliminary drawings.

3. A list indicating which model homes fit which lots. Unless a lot is planned for another use, each lot will be designed so that at least one of the model units fits on the lot in compliance with Code requirements. The list should indicate whether optional covered patios, porches, etc., will still allow the unit to fit on the lot in compliance with requirements.

12. DS 2-10.3.2. E. Three (3) copies of Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) are required if there is to be an association of home owners to assume responsibility for the ownership and maintenance of commonly-owned property.

13. LUC Sec. 3.6.1.4.A.10 Add a general note stating: "There shall be no further division of land or resubdivision without the developer or successor in interest furnishing written notice to all property owners of record within the boundaries of the RCP. In no event shall further division of land occur without the written approval of the Mayor and Council."

14. LUC Sec. 3.6.1.4.G.2 Handicap ramps are missing at the entrance from Pantano Parkway to the subdivision. See engineering comments.

Provide details of the different types of handicap ramps.

Clearly indicate the location of the required landings for handicap ramps.

Provide a handicap ramp from the parking spaces located in the north east corner of the project connecting to the handicap ramp located on the corner south of the parking spaces.

Access ramps at crosswalks connecting to sidewalks must be provided. In addition Truncated Dome (early warning systems) must be added to all access ramps where transitioning from the pedestrian area to the vehicular use area or at HC access aisles transitioning to the sidewalk area.

15. LUC Sec. 3.6.1.4.H Add the following as a note in the general notes: All amenities and improvements must be completed upon construction of thirty (30) percent of the total number of residential units within the RCP.

16. Based on changes to the plans and responses to the comments additional comments may be forth coming.

If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Terry Stevens, (520) 791-5550 ext. 2000.

TLS C:\planning\cdrc\tentativeplat\S06-144tp.doc
08/28/2006 ROGER HOWLETT COT NON-DSD COMMUNITY PLANNING Denied DEPARTMENT OF URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN

Regarding

SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application

CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT

S06-144 Oasis Golf Links 08/28/06

(XXXX) Tentative Plat
() Development Plan
(XXXX) Landscape Plan
() Revised Plan/Plat
() Board of Adjustment
() Other

CROSS REFERENCE:

NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: South Pantano

GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE:

COMMENTS DUE BY: 7/21/06

SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:

() No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment
() Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions
() RCP Proposal Complies With Plan Policies
() See Additional Comments Attached
() No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on:
(XXXX) Resubmittal Required:
(XXXX) Tentative Plat
() Development Plan
(XXXX) Landscape Plan
(XXXX) Other – Color Elevations, Photos

REVIEWER: D. Estolano 791-4505 DATE: 07
/21/06

Because this project is being proposed as a Residential Cluster Project (RCP), it must comply with section 3.6.1 of the Land Use Code, specifically section 3.6.1.4 of the general development criteria. The RCP requires compliance with policies of the General Plan, the South Pantano Area Plan, and the Design Guidelines Manual. The Plans require community amenities, such as but not limited to; streetscapes with pedestrian oasis, common area(s) of appropriate land size(s) to sustain residential amenities for all.

The City of Tucson General Plan and the Design Guidelines Manual address the importance of development that uses colors of the natural environment which include a variety of blended shades such as blues, yellows, oranges, greens, purples and reds. Applying a variety of these colors to this RCP would be consistent with the variety of colors surrounding the area. Please visit the Urban Planning and Design’s website link to view The Sonoran Desert Color Palette for Building Exteriors”: http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/planning/sonorandesertcolors.pdf, Please make a note on the plat that no two homes with the same façade or color scheme shall be placed next to one another.

The Design Guidelines Manual states that side and rear building facades should be built with attention to architectural character and detail comparable to the front façade, particularly if rear and side facades are visible from streets or adjacent properties. Enhancement can include design treatments such a pop outs, color variation, etc. Massing of proposed structures to existing structures will also be a part of this review. The tentative plat should identify the height of existing structures that surround the project site. Please submit plans showing how the RCP will comply with these design requirements. Photos, dimensioned elevations, or a combination of both must be submitted

The General Plan, and the Design Guidelines Manual encourages the creation of cooling microclimates along pedestrian paths that are internal to the subdivision. In order to provide such a microclimate it is required to provide a minimum of one fifteen (15) gallon tree, no more than ten (10) feet from the back of the sidewalk, on every other lot frontage. This should be shown on the landscape plan along with a note indicating such.

Per DS 2-10.3.2.D, the lots within this project that are less than 4,000 square feet must submit the following:

Floor plans or drawings of the footprint of each unit, showing exterior dimensions. Be certain that locations of second floors (if applicable), front entrances, and motor vehicle parking spaces are noted. These can be preliminary plans. To aide in the review it is helpful to provide building footprints drawn at the same scale as the tentative plat to check which models fit on which lots.
Building elevations of all proposed units with height dimensions.
A list of what model homes fit which lots. Unless a lot is planned for another use, each lot will be designed so that at least one of the model units fits on the lot in compliance with Code requirements.

Lots 1, 15 & 26 that incorporate walls that abut amenities such as designated open space areas, common areas, and trail systems, should meet the following criteria: the masonry portion of the wall does not exceed four (4) feet, eight (8) inches in height, except for pillars, with one (1) foot six (6) inch wrought iron or other similar open fencing materials on top. This is to provide security to those using the facility placing the “eyes of the community” on these areas. Please submit a detail on the tentative plat to indicate compliance with this requirement.

Any proposed masonry screen wall around the perimeter of the subdivision, or within the development shall be constructed of, or painted with, graffiti-resistant materials. These screen walls shall incorporate one of the following decorative materials: tile, stone, brick, textured brick/block, a coarse-textured material such as stucco or plaster, or a combination of the above materials. Please identify the location of the walls. In addition, any continuous wall greater than 75 feet in length and three feet in height visible from the public right-of-way shall vary the wall alignment (jog, curve, notch, or setback, etc.) and include trees or shrubs in the voids created by the variations. Please provide a detail of all proposed walls in the development and indicate the materials that will be used.

The Plans call for innovative site design to include design elements of usable open space and active/passive recreational space and that those pedestrian facilities be accessible to the handicapped. [An active/passive adult recreational facility, which includes a tot lot with appropriate tot equipment and ground material]. The adult recreational amenities to include, but not limited to: ramada(s), table(s), outdoor grill, shaded sitting area(s). Ideally the recreation area should equal one (1) lot in size, but given this project proposes a detention basin, this basin can also serve a dual purpose with the placement of required amenities within and surrounding the basin. The slopes surrounding the basin must be adjusted to provide handicap accessibility to the amenities by way of an all-weather ADA compliant path that connects to the proposed sidewalks within the subdivision. To increase appearance, shade, and longevity diversity, please provide an appropriate amount of longer living and diverse shade producing trees, including evergreens that are in the Low water Use Drought Tolerant List. Also please do not locate any vegetation that has thorns at maturation in the recreation areas. Please indicate on either the tentative plat or landscape plan the location of these amenities.

Please add the identifying case number, S06-144, to all sheets of the Tentative Plat and Landscape Plans.
09/06/2006 ED ABRIGO PIMA COUNTY ASSESSOR Approv-Cond Office of the Pima County Assessor
115 N. Church Ave.
Tucson, Arizona 85701

BILL STAPLES
ASSESSOR




TO: CDRC Office
Subdivision Review
City of Tucson (FAX# 791-5559)

FROM: Gary Ault, Mapping Supervisor
Pima County Assessor’s Office
Mapping Department

DATE: July 21, 2006


RE: Assessor’s Review and Comments Regarding Tentative Plat
S06-144 Oasis Golf Links T141527 (136-13)

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

X Plat meets Assessor’s Office requirements.
_______ Plat does not meet Assessor’s Office requirements.


COMMENTS: Thank you for your submittal. Please make the following additions/corrections in the final plat.
Add the dimensions, bearings and curve data for the perimeter.
Add bearings for the lot lines and dimensions and bearings for the street centerline.
Add the complete curve data.
Add Common Area “A” to the street and add the square footage.
Add North or South to the Basis of Bearing in the general notes, then add that bearing to section line on sheet 2.
Add section tie, with dimension and bearing to point of tie on the subdivision.
If there are any questions, please contact Susan King at 740-4391.

NOTE: THE ASSESSOR’S CURRENT INVOLVEMENT IN PROCESSING ITS MANUAL MAPS TO DIGITAL FORMAT IS EXPEDITED GREATLY BY EXCHANGE OF DIGITAL DATA. IN THE COURSE OF RECORDING THIS SUBDIVISION YOUR ASSISTANCE IN PROVIDING THIS OFFICE WITH AN AUTOCAD COPY WOULD BE GREATLY APPRECIATED. THANK YOU FOR ANY DIGITAL DATA PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED.





Susan King
09/07/2006 PATRICIA GEHLEN ZONING-DECISION LETTER REVIEW Denied COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES

September 7, 2006

Chuck Martin
Rick Engineering Company
1745 E. River Road #101
Tucson, Arizona 85718

Subject: Oasis Golf Links Tentative Plat

Dear Chuck:

Your submittal of June 22, 2006 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a DETAILED cover letter explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed:

ALL BLACKLINES MUST BE FOLDED

9 Copies Revised Tentative Plat (ESD, Landscape, Wastewater, Traffic, Real Estate, Engineering, Zoning, DUPD, DSD)

5 Copies Revised Landscape Plan (Landscape, Engineering, Zoning, DUPD, DSD )

2 Copies Revised NPPO Plan (Landscape, DSD)

3 Copies Color Elevations and floor plans (DUPD, Zoning, DSD)

2 Copies Revised Drainage Report (Engineering, DSD)

2 Copies Title Report (Real Estate, DSD)

Should you have any questions, please call me at 791-5608 extension 1179.

Sincerely,


Patricia Gehlen
CDRC Manager

All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/
Via fax: 322-6956