Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Plan Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Plan Number - S06-138
Review Name: TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 06/15/2006 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 06/19/2006 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | The Landscape Section does not recommend approval of the plans at this time due to inconsistencies with adopted codes and standards. The plan was reviewed for compliance with the Land Use Code (LUC), Development Standards (DS) and other applicable standards and guidelines referred to in the comments. Revise the plans as necessary to comply. 1) Revise the landscape plan to show the locations and note the height and materials used to construct any proposed or required screen walls. DS 2-07.A.3 A wall is required on the west side of the site. 2) Revise the landscape plan to provide a twenty-five foot landscape buffer outside of the required wall on the west side of the site. C9-01-05 3) Revise the tentative plat and landscape plan to show the study area and resource area of the Rodeo Wash. Per C9-01-05, no development is allowed in the resource area. 4) Revise the development plan and landscape plan to clarify compliance with the screening requirements for loading and refuse storage areas. LUC Table 3.7.2.-I. 5) Revise the landscape plans to show the limits of grading. DS 2-07.2.2.B.5 6) Revise the native plant preservation plans to show the limits of grading. DS 2-15.3.4.A 7) Identify natural areas on the landscape and native plant preservation plans. DS 2-15.6.0 8) Update the native plant preservation plan to clarify that Lot 1 is developed. DS 2-15.2.0 9) Revise the tentative plat to show Lot 5 and Common Area "A" referred to in the title. 10) Revise the title block to include Blocks 1 & 2. 11) A vehicular use area must be provided with post barricades or wheel stop curbing designed to prevent parked vehicles from extending beyond the property lines; damaging adjacent landscaping, walls, or buildings per DS 3-05.2.3.C. Revise the plans as necessary to indicate appropriate barriers. 12) Grading, hydrology, and landscape structural plans are to be integrated to make maximum use of site storm water runoff for supplemental on-site irrigation purposes. The landscape plan shall indicate use of all runoff, from individual catch basins around single trees to basins accepting flow from an entire vehicular use area or roof area. LUC 3.7.4.3.B Revise the landscape plan to show the extent of supplementary irrigation in each planting area provided by water harvesting methods. Show the amount and disposition of flow and indicate drainage points from buildings and paved areas. DS 2-07.2.2.C RESUBMITTAL OF ALL PLANS IS REQUIRED. |
| 06/19/2006 | JIM EGAN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | |
| 06/27/2006 | FRODRIG2 | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Denied | June 27, 2006 TO: Michael John Baker, P.E. Floerchinger Sadler Steel Baker, Inc. THRU: Patricia Gehlen City of Tucson, Development Services Department FROM: Dickie Fernández, E.I.T. Pima County Development Services Department Development Review Division (Wastewater) SUBJECT: Wilmot & I-10 Commercial Center Tentative Plat – 1st Submittal S06-138 The proposed sewer collection lines to serve the above-referenced project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use. Provide a letter from PCWWM Planning Services, written within the past 90 days, stating that treatment and conveyance system capacity for this project is available. A capacity request form may be found at http://www.pima.gov/wwm/forms/docs/CapResponseRequest.pdf. ALL SHEETS. Add the project number, S06-138, to the title block of each sheet. This number should be shown larger or bolder than any cross-reference numbers. SHEET 1. Please show the project reference number S01-040 that is tied to this property. Based on the evaluation of the proposed sewer design, this project qualifies for Standard sewer connection fee rates. Be aware that this project proposes connecting to an existing 18-inch public sewer, and thus will likely require a flow management plan at the time of construction. SHEET 1. Revise General Note 10 to read ON-SITE SANITARY SEWERS, EXCEPT PUBLIC SEWERS WITHIN PUBLIC SEWER EASEMENTS OR RIGHTS-OF-WAYS, WILL BE PRIVATE AND WILL BE CONSTRUCTED, OPERATED AND MAINTAINED ON A PRIVATE BASIS. THE LOCATION AND METHOD OF CONNECTION TO AN EXISTING PUBLIC SANITARY SEWER IS SUBJECT TO REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE PIMA COUNTY WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT AT THE TIME OF SUBMITTAL OF PLUMBING OR BUILDING PLANS. SHEET 2. Clearly label and show the existing BCS for the existing convenience store located on the southern section of this project. Please label it with its corresponding size. We will require a revised set of drawings and a response letter addressing each comment. Additional comments may be made during the review of these documents. The next submittal of this project will be the 2nd submittal. A check for the review fee of this submittal in the amount of $100.00 made out to PIMA COUNTY TREASURER must accompany the revised set of bluelines and response letter. For any questions regarding the fee schedule, please go to http://www.pimaxpress.com/SubDivision/Documents/Fees.PDF where you may find the appropriate wastewater review fees at the bottom of page 1. If the number of sheets changes, please adjust the review fee accordingly. If you have any questions regarding the above mentioned comments, please contact me. Sincerely, Dickie Fernández, E.I.T. Telephone: (520) 740-6947 Copy: Project |
| 06/30/2006 | LIZA CASTILLO | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Denied | 4350 E. Irvington Road, Tucson, AZ 85714 Post Office Box 711, Tucson, AZ 85702 WR# 164648 June 30, 2006 Floerchinger, Sadler, Steele, Baker, Inc. ATTN: Mr. Michael John Baker, PE 326 S. Convent Tucson, AZ 85701 Dear Mr. Baker: SUBJECT: WILMOT & I-10 COMMERCIAL CENTER S06-138 Tucson Electric Power Company (TEP) has reviewed the plan submitted June 15, 2006. TEP is unable to approve the plan at this time. TEP facilities do not appear to be properly indicated on the plan. In order for TEP to approve the plan, the facilities and easements must be depicted on the plans. Enclosed is a copy of a TEP facility map showing the approximate location of the existing facilities. All cost associated with the relocation of the facilities in conflict will be billable to the developer. Please resubmit two revised bluelines to the City of Tucson for TEP’s review. You may contact the area Designer, Todd Stocksdale, at (520) 917-8715 if you have any questions. Sincerely, Ann Slusser Scheduling Coordinator Design Build Enclosure cc: P. Gehlen, City of Tucson, (by e-mail) F. Rodriguez, City of Tucson (by e-mail) T. Stocksdale, TEP |
| 07/12/2006 | KAY MARKS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Denied | 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 KAY MARKS ADDRESSING OFFICIAL PH: 740-6480 FAX #: 740-6370 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL SUBJECT: S06-138 WILMOT & I-10 COMMERCIAL CTR/TENTATIVE PLAT DATE: 7-12-06 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and the following matters must be resolved prior to our approval: Correct Lots 1 through 5 to 1 through 4 and add Blocks 1 and 2 in Title Block on sheet 2. Label an approval name for the Public street on Final Plat. es |
| 07/12/2006 | JCLARK3 | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | * No known landfill with in 1000 feet of this development. * Enclosures require sidewall protection and doors. Note: The plan shows three resturants. Resturants have most of their supplies shipped to them in recycleable containers. No mentioned of recycling for the project. Resturants usually have a grease container. The container coanot be stored with in the ten foot clear area of the enclosure. |
| 07/14/2006 | JOSE ORTIZ | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Denied | July 14, 2006 ACTIVITY NUMBER: S06-138 PROJECT NAME: Wilmot & I-10 Commercial Ctr. PROJECT ADDRESS: 7710 S Wilmot Rd PROJECT REVIEWER: Jose E. Ortiz PE, Traffic Engineer Resubmittal Required: Traffic Engineering does not recommend approval of the Tentative Plat; therefore a revised Tentative Plat and a Traffic Impact Analysis is required for resubmittal. The following items must be revised or added to the plat. 1. Include a response letter with the next submittal that states how all comments have been addressed. 2. Provide the Traffic Impact Analysis as required per Rezoning Condition C9-01-05 (note 6 on the Tentative Plat) 3. Confirm that rezoning condition note 5 has been considered in the design (NOTE 5: "WILMOT ROAD SHALL BE WIDENED TO PROVIDE A SOUTHBOUND RIGHT TURN LANE INTO THE NORTHERN MOST ACCESS OPENING AND A CONTINUOUS NORTHBOUND LEFT TURN LANE FOR BOTH ACCESS OPENING). 4. Ensure that rezoning condition note 4 has been considered in the design. Label the ADOT freeway ramp to verify that 250' clearance has been provided. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-4259 x305 or Jose.Ortiz@tucsonaz.gov |
| 07/18/2006 | ROGER HOWLETT | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Denied | DEPARTMENT OF URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT S06-138 Wilmot & I-10 Comm. Ctr. 07/17/06 () Tentative Plat ( ) Development Plan () Landscape Plan ( ) Revised Plan/Plat ( ) Board of Adjustment ( ) Other CROSS REFERENCE: C9-01-05 NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: Rincon Southeast Subreg. Plan GATEWAY ROUTE: N/A COMMENTS DUE BY: 7/14/06 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: ( ) No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment ( ) Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions ( ) RCP Proposal Complies With Plan Policies () See Additional Comments Attached ( ) No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: () Resubmittal Required: () Tentative Plat ( ) Development Plan () Landscape Plan ( ) Other – Elevations and Color Palette REVIEWER: J. Hershenhorn 791-4505 DATE: 7/`4/06 Wilmot & I-10 Commercial Center S06-138 As per rezoning condition 1.a., please show a minimum 25-foot wide landscape border along the south and west property lines, on both the tentative plat (TP) and landscape plan (LP) – the only one shown is on the west boundary, sheet 2 of the TP. Please show the required masonry walls along the south and west property lines, on the TP and LP. Provide wall design details, and show the varied alignment on the plans to demonstrate compliance with rezoning condition 14. As per rezoning condition 1.d., please provide crosswalks aligned in an east-west direction crossing the pedestrian area access lanes (PAALs) to provide a continuous pedestrian system on the north and south sides of the public street. Please provide at least one crosswalk, of a different texture, color, and/or material, aligned in a north-south direction and connecting areas on the north and south of the public street. Because it will be a public street, the crosswalk must be designed and constructed in accordance with applicable City standards. Show on both the TP and LP. As per rezoning condition 8, prior to final plat approval, please submit documentation sufficient to demonstrate that the blanket cross-access easement has been provided. Regarding rezoning conditions 12 and 13, have the Rodeo Wash channel improvements been constructed? Who are the “others”? Please clarify how the site design addresses these rezoning conditions. Regarding rezoning condition 14, please clearly show the locations of all masonry walls. Are there any in addition to the 30-inch screen walls shown on sheet L-1? According to rezoning condition 1.a., walls are required along the south and west boundaries. For all walls that will be greater than 75 feet long and 3 feet high, please show the varied alignment on the plans, as well as trees or shrubs that will be planted in the voids created by the variations. All screen walls must be decorative. Please provide a wall detail identifying the decorative pattern, on the TP or LP. Please provide color elevations to demonstrate compliance with rezoning condition 15. If that isn’t possible at this time, please indicate when that information will be available. What is planned to delineate the transition between the PAAL and undeveloped areas to the west of Lot 2? |
| 07/21/2006 | PETER MCLAUGHLIN | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Center Plans Coordination Office FROM: Peter McLaughlin Senior Planner FOR: David Rivera Principal Planner PROJECT: S06-138 Wilmot & I-10 Commercial Center Tentative Plat/Development Plan TRANSMITTAL: July 21, 2006 DUE DATE: July 14, 2006 1. An applicant has one (1) year from the date of application to obtain approval of a tentative plat that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application. This tentative plat must be approved on or before June 14, 2007. 2. Fill in the S06-138 number near the title block in the lower right hand corner of all sheets of the plat, landscape and NPPO plans. DS 2-03.2.2.B.1 3. Based on rezoning condition #1, the title block should indicate that this is a "tentative plat/development plan". DS 2-03.2.4.U 4. Add the lot area and actual FAR to the Lot Data Table for Lot 1 (the existing convenience store). DS 2-05.2.4.M 5. The title block on sheet 1 of 2 reads "Lots 1-4 and Blocks 1&2 but the title block on sheet 2 of 2 reads Lots 1-5 and common area "A". Revise to be consistent and accurate. If common area is proposed it must be labeled clearly with its letter designation on the plat. Enclose any proposed common area(s) with a solid line. Include dimensions and square footages of each common area on the plat. DS 2-03.2.4.C 6. With a proposed building height of 40 feet, the MS&R street yard setback for the proposed restaurant located on lot 2 is not met. The required setback is the greater of 21 feet and the height of exterior structure wall measured from back of MS&R future curb. Revise drawing to demonstrate compliance with LUC 3.2.6.5. LUC 3.2.6.5 7. Dimension the depth of the vehicle backup spur located at the east end of lot 2. A minimum 3-foot deep backup spur is required and a minimum of 3 feet is required between the end of the spur and any obstruction to allow for vehicle overhang. DS 3-05.2.2.D 8. Provide a copy of blanket cross access agreement described in rezoning condition 8 DS 2-05.2.4.U 9. Demonstrate compliance with rezoning condition 14 by detailing any proposed walls on the plan, including their height and linear footage, materials, and their required variations in alignment. Walls visible from the public right-of-way must be constructed with at least one of the decorative materials listed. In addition, all walls greater than 75 feet in length and 3 feet in height shall be built with alignments that incorporate jogs, curves, notches, etc. and include trees or shrubs in voids created by the variations. DS 2-05.2.4.U DS 2-05.2.4.N 10. Revise the vehicle parking calculations for Lots 2, 3 and 4 to list the number of vehicle spaces provided. DS 2-05.2.4.P 11. Demonstrate compliance with rezoning conditions 12, 13 and 20 by delineating and dimensioning the resource area for Rodeo Wash. DS 2-05.2.4.U 12. A copy of proposed CC&R's must be provided to the Zoning Review Section for review and approval prior to approval of the final plat. The CC&R's must meet the criteria of DS 2-03.6.6. 13. Detail any proposed freestanding lighting on the plat to demonstrate compliance with rezoning condition 17. DS 2-05.2.4.U 14. Label the location, height, dimensions and materials of all freestanding signs to demonstrate compliance with rezoning condition 16, which requires that signage be co-located and integrated to improve the site appearance and sign readability. Provide sign elevation drawings. DS 2-05.2.4.U DS 2-05.2.4.N 15. Provide exterior elevation drawings for the proposed buildings to demonstrate compliance with rezoning condition 15. DS 2-05.2.4.U 16. All requested changes must be made to the Development Plan/Tentative Plat and Landscape Plan. DS 2-07.2.1.A If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Peter McLaughlin, (520) 791-5608. RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING ITEMS IS REQUIRED: revised development plan, landscape plan, detailed and dimensioned color building and sign elevation drawings. |
| 08/07/2006 | ELIZABETH EBERBACH | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approved | TO: Patricia Gehlen; CDRC Coordinator FOR: FSSB Engineering SUBJECT: Wilmot/I-10 Commercial Center Tentative Plat submittal Engineering Review REVIEWER: Elizabeth Eberbach ACTIVITY NUMBER: S06-138 SUMMARY: The Tentative Plat, Drainage Report, Landscape documents, and fax dated 7AUG06 were reviewed. Development Services Department Engineering Division recommends approval of the Tentative Plat. The Drainage Report was reviewed for Tentative Plat purposes only. The grading plan will require further details for basin and the weir outlet, show further information regarding how water harvesting is utilized, with a Geotechnical Report that provides additional percolation test results. If you have questions or would like to set up a meeting, call me at 791-5550, extension 2204. Elizabeth Eberbach, PE Civil Engineer Engineering Division Development Services |
| 08/09/2006 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES ***REVISED*** November 9, 2006 Michael John Baker, P.E. Floerchinger, Sadler, Steele, Baker Inc. 326 South Covent Tucson, AZ 85701 Subject: S06-138 Wilmot & I-10 Commercial Center Tentative Plat Dear Mike: Your submittal of June 15, 2006 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a DETAILED cover letter explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLUELINES MUST BE FOLDED 12 Copies Revised Tentative Plat ( ESD, TEP, Engineering, Addressing, DUPD, Wastewater, Traffic, Real Estate, ADOT, Landscape, Zoning, DSD) 5 Copies Revised Landscape Plan (Landscape, DUPD, Zoning, Engineering, DSD) 2 Copies Revised NPPO Plans (Landscape, DSD) 2 Copies Color Elevations (DUPD, DSD) Two additional review agencies will be added to the second review. Due to the proximately to I-10, ADOT will be required to review the plans. City of Tucson Real Estate will also need to look at the resubmittal. DUE TO THE REVISED REZONING CONDITIONS ADOPTED 11/7/2006, ENGINEERING HAS BEEN ADDED BACK TO RESUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS. Should you have any questions, please call me at 791-5608 ext. 1179. Sincerely, Patricia Y. Gehlen CDRC Manager All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: 628-1375 |