Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you cannot find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Plan Review Detail

Plan Number: S06-128
Parcel: Unknown

Address:
3514 E GLENN ST

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW

Plan Number - S06-128
Review Name: TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
06/08/2006 FERNE RODRIGUEZ START PLANS SUBMITTED Completed
06/15/2006 PETER MCLAUGHLIN LANDSCAPE REVIEW Denied 1) Add the subdivision case number (S06-128) to the lower right hand corner of all sheets of the Plat, Landscape Plan and NPP Plan.
DS 2-03.2.2.B.1

2) Within a vehicular use area, one (1) canopy tree is required for each 10 motor vehicle parking spaces and every parking space shall be located within forty (40) feet of the trunk of a canopy tree (as measured from the center of the tree trunk) per LUC 3.7.2.3.A.1.a. Add a calculation of the required number of canopy trees per DS 2-07.2.2.A.2.c. Note: In areas where a required landscape border falls within the vehicular use area, up to 50% of the canopy trees may be counted towards both the minimum parking lot canopy tree requirement and the landscape border canopy tree requirement per LUC 3.7.2.3.b

3) Show on the landscape plan the ultimate site location of all native plants to be transplanted on site.
DS 2-15.3.4.B.2

4) Provide the latin (proper botanical) name and common name of the existing trees to remain in place under the materials schedule on sheet L 2.0.
DS 2-07.2.2.d

5) An unpaved planting area, which is a minimum of thirty-four (34) square feet in area and four (4) feet in width, must be provided for each canopy tree. Dimension the unpaved portions of the parking lot planter areas by providing a typical detail for each type of planter showing dimensions of the unpaved areas.
LUC 3.7.2.3
DS 2-07.2.2.A.2.e

6) Indicate the methods by which water harvesting/ storm runoff is used to benefit planting areas on the site.
LUC 3.7.4.3.B

7) All disturbed, grubbed, graded, or bladed areas not otherwise improved shall be landscaped, reseeded, or treated with an inorganic or organic ground cover to help reduce dust pollution. Revise landscape plan to identify inert ground cover materials. A minimum two-inch layer is required. LUC 3.7.2.7.,
DS 2-06.5.2.C
Also, clarify that the areas adjacent the sidewalk areas along Glenn Street will be treated for dust control per LUC 3.7.2.4.A.4.

8) Revise the landscape plan to show clearly the locations and to note the height and materials used to construct any proposed or required screen walls. The site is required to include screening of the parking area from adjacent residentially zoned property with a 5-foot wall. Per LUC Table 3.7.2-I a 30-inch screen is required along MS&R Glenn Street. Revise as necessary. DS 2-07.A.3

9) The multifamily (duplex) lots in the proposed subdivision are required to have a 10-foot interior landscape border where the site is bordered by adjacent residentially zoned property. Revise to provide landscape borders where required, show all dimensions and calculations for required landscape borders.
LUC Table 3.7.2-I
06/16/2006 TOM MARTINEZ OTHER AGENCIES AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION Approved NO COMMENT
S06-128
BRIGHT/KLIMAN ARCHITECTS
GLENN DUPLEXES

--------------------------------------------------------


Confidentiality and Nondisclosure Notice: This email transmission and any attachments are intended for use by the person(s)/entity(ies) named above and may contain confidential/privileged information. Any unauthorized use, disclosure or distribution is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by e-mail, and delete or destroy all copies plus attachments.
06/19/2006 JIM EGAN COT NON-DSD FIRE Approv-Cond The Tentative Plat Plan is approved, June 19, 2006.
However, the Plat plans show the address as 3414 E. Glenn.
Permits Plus show the address as 3412 E. Glenn.
From looking at the location map on the plans and the Tucson Department of Transportation Map Center (2005 aerial view), the correct address appears to be 3514 E. Glenn. Please verify the address.
06/21/2006 PETER MCLAUGHLIN ZONING REVIEW Denied CDRC TRANSMITTAL


TO: Development Services Center
Plans Coordination Office


FROM: Peter McLaughlin
Senior Planner

FOR: David Rivera
Principal Planner

PROJECT:
Glenn Duplexes
S06-128
Tentative Plat

TRANSMITTAL: June 21, 2006
DUE DATE: July 7, 2006

1. An applicant has one (1) year from the date of application to obtain approval of a tentative plat that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application. This tentative plat must be approved on or before June 7, 2007.
LUC 4.1.7.1

2. Fill in the S06-128 number near the title block in the lower right hand corner of all sheets of the plat, landscape and NPPO plans.
DS 2-03.2.2.B.1

3. This project fronts on Glenn Street, which is a designated Major Street and Route. Add a general note that states the project is designed to meet the overlay zone criteria of LUC Sec. 2.8.3, Major Streets and Routes (MS&R) Setback Zone.
DS 2-03.2.2.B.7

4. Revise the address in the title block to be correct.
DS 2-02.2.1.A.3

5. A copy of proposed CC&R's must be provided to the Zoning Review Section for review and approval prior to approval of the final plat. The CC&R's must meet the criteria of DS 2-03.6.6 and must provide for the maintenance and liability for within common area(s).
DS 2-10.3.2.E

6. This project was submitted as a tentative plat. Revise drawings by removing the final plat elements such as the Approval Block, the book and page number spaces near the upper and lower edge of sheet A 1.1, and the statement on sheet A 1.1 that reads "this final plat is a re-subdivision of…." Refer to DS 2-03.2 for tentative plat format and contents. Add all required general notes listed in DS 2-03.2.2.B. Further comments may be necessary once all required notes are added. DS 2-03

7. The proposed maximum height is stated to be 20 feet in the LUC data but shown to be 20.33' above finished floor elevation in the elevation drawings. Revise to be consistent. Site perimeter setbacks may not be verified until building heights are specified. For setbacks purposes building heights are measured above design grade elevation rather than from finished floor elevation. Provide dimensioned elevation drawings indicating the proposed height of homes above design grade in order to verify that setbacks are met. Add the height along each building wall to the drawing on sheet C 1.3. Note that the required building setback to adjacent R-2 zoned property is the greater of 10 feet and ¾ height of exterior structure wall. Based on the proposed 20+ foot building heights for the new structures, the building setbacks from all interior property lines must be a least 15 feet.
LUC 3.2.6.4
DS 2-02.2.1.A.6

8. The required street yard bldg. setback for MS&R Glenn Street is the greater of 21 feet and the height of exterior structure wall measured from back of future curb location. Revise dimensioned front yard setback on plan as required. LUC 3.2.6.5

9. A title block with the following information is to be provided in the lower right corner of each sheet.

a. Number of lots and common areas.

b. Legal description by section, township, and range.

c. If the final plat is a re-subdivision of a previously recorded plat, indicate the title and the book and page reference of the existing subdivision and lot number in the title block.
DS 2-03.2.1.G

10. The north arrow, contour interval and scale should be placed together on each sheet, preferably in the upper right hand corner of the plat. DS 2-03.2.1.H

11. Revise tentative plat to label each common area individually with a separate letter designation. Enclose common areas with a solid line. DS 2-03.2.4.C

12. Interior building setbacks are required to be the greater of 10 feet or ¾ height of exterior building wall. With building heights in excess of 20 feet the required bldg. setbacks are more than 15 feet. Revise as required (see comment 7 regarding building heights/setbacks. LUC 3.2.6.4

13. Show the location and dimension widths of any existing or proposed easements. Add the recordation information by docket and page numbers for all easements, or state that they will be "by final plat". DS 2-03.2.3.C
DS 2-03.2.4.J

14. Add the required truncated domes to the concrete ramp detail B-1 on sheet C 1.3 ANSI

15. A wall is shown inside the far-side future sight visibility triangle (SVT). Revise plan. DS 3-01.5.2.A

16. All requested revisions must be made to tentative plat, landscape & NPPO plans.
DS 2-07.2.1.A

If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Peter McLaughlin, (520) 791-5608.
06/27/2006 GLENN HICKS COT NON-DSD PARKS & RECREATION Approved DATE: June 26, 2006

TO: Ferne Rodriguez, Development Services

FROM: Glenn Hicks
Parks and Recreation
791-4873 ext. 215
Glenn.Hicks@tucsonaz.gov

CC:


SUBJECT: S06-128 Glenn Duplexes: Tentative Plat Review(6/8/06)

Staff has no comments.
06/29/2006 JCLARK3 ENV SVCS REVIEW Denied * No known landfill within 1000 feet of this development.
* Have no problem with the project utilizing a dumpster on casters for service.
* Service truck can turnaround in the space provided.
* Enclosure does not meet standards. Detail shows 10' depth while the plan view shows 8'. There is also no side wall protection shown.
06/30/2006 ROGER HOWLETT COT NON-DSD COMMUNITY PLANNING Approved DEPARTMENT OF URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN

Regarding

SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application

CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT

S06-128 Glenn Duplexes 06/27/06

(XXXX) Tentative Plat
() Development Plan
(XXXX) Landscape Plan
() Revised Plan/Plat
() Board of Adjustment
() Other

CROSS REFERENCE: S04-004

NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: Grant-Alvernon Area Plan

GATEWAY ROUTE:

COMMENTS DUE BY: 07/07/06

SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:

() No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment
(XXXX) Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions
() RCP Proposal Complies With Plan Policies
() See Additional Comments Attached
() No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on:
() Resubmittal Required:
() Tentative Plat
() Development Plan
() Landscape Plan
() Other – Elevations and Color Palette

REVIEWER: D. Estolano 791-4505 DATE: 06/26/06
07/07/2006 LIZA CASTILLO UTILITIES TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER Denied SUBJECT: GLENN DUPLEXES
S06-128

Tucson Electric Power Company (TEP) has reviewed the plan submitted June
8, 2006. TEP is unable to approve the plan at this time. There are
existing electrical facilities within the boundaries of this project.
In order for TEP to approve the plan the facilities and easements must
be depicted on the plans.

Enclosed is a copy of a TEP facility map showing the approximate
location of the existing facilities. All costs associated with the
relocation of the facilities in conflict will be billable to the
developer.

Please resubmit two revised bluelines to City of Tucson Development
Services Department for TEP's review. You may contact the area Field
Technician, Steve Garcia, at 917-8739 should you have any questions.

Sincerely,



Denise Tellez
Scheduling Coordinator

dt
Enclosure
cc: P. Gehlen/F. Rodriguez, City of Tucson (by e-mail)
S. Garcia, TEP


Denise Tellez
918-8297 DB102
07/07/2006 ED ABRIGO PIMA COUNTY ASSESSOR Approved Office of the Pima County Assessor
115 N. Church Ave.
Tucson, Arizona 85701

BILL STAPLES
ASSESSOR




TO: CDRC Office
Subdivision Review
City of Tucson (FAX# 791-5559)

FROM: Gary Ault, Mapping Supervisor
Pima County Assessor’s Office
Mapping Department

DATE: July 7, 2006


RE: Assessor’s Review and Comments Regarding Tentative Plat
S06-128 Glenn Duplexes T131433 (111-07)

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

X Plat meets Assessor’s Office requirements.
_______ Plat does not meet Assessor’s Office requirements.


COMMENTS: Thank you for your submittal. Please make the following additions/corrections in the final plat.
The title block must be in the lower right hand corner of each sheet and must have the name of the subdivision, the number of lots and whatever common areas there may be. It must also have the section, township and range as well as the name of the subdivision the new one is coming out of, if that is the case (Fruitvale Addition).
Remove all shading, stippling and building footprints on the site plan sheet.
Add the name of the adjacent subdivision and the map&plat, in this case Fruitvale Addition, 04/58 M&P.
Add the section tie, with bearing and dimension from the section corner to the point of tie on the subdivision.
Make sure that the drive is bounded with dashed lines and not solid, otherwise you have a parcel sitting on top of another parcel.
If there are any questions, please contact Susan King 740-4391.

NOTE: THE ASSESSOR’S CURRENT INVOLVEMENT IN PROCESSING ITS MANUAL MAPS TO DIGITAL FORMAT IS EXPEDITED GREATLY BY EXCHANGE OF DIGITAL DATA. IN THE COURSE OF RECORDING THIS SUBDIVISION YOUR ASSISTANCE IN PROVIDING THIS OFFICE WITH AN AUTOCAD COPY WOULD BE GREATLY APPRECIATED. THANK YOU FOR ANY DIGITAL DATA PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED.




Susan King
07/07/2006 PATRICIA GILBERT ENGINEERING REVIEW Denied TO: Patricia Gehlen; CDRC Coordinator DATE: July 6, 2006

SUBJECT: Engineering review of the Glenn Duplexes Tentative Plat. The activity number is S06-128.

SUMMARY: The Tentative Plat and Drainage Report were received by Engineering on June 8th, 2006. Engineering has reviewed the received items and does not recommend approval of the Tentative Plat.

RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: TENTATIVE PLAT

APPROVAL: DRAINAGE REPORT

GENERAL COMMENTS

1. The Drainage Report was reviewed for Tentative Plat purposes only.

2. Please include the Assurance Package with the Final Plat submittal. This package must include the original Third Party Trust, the original Amendment to Trust, a copy of the Trust Agreement, a copy of the Deed, and a Title Report.

3. Include a copy of the CC&Rs with the Final Plat submittal. The specific maintenance notes specified in the Standards Manual for Drainage Design and Floodplain Management, SMDDFM, 14.3.2 must be included on the Final Plat or in the CC&Rs. The term "owner" in the maintenance notes is to be replaced with "Homeowners Association".

4. Please provide a copy of the boundary closure calculations with the Final Plat submittal.

5. A Grading Plan and Permit will be required. Proposed grading in excess of 5,000 yards is designated "engineered grading" and a soils engineering report is required with the Grading Plan submittal. Development Standard 11-01.4.1.C. The Soils Report must also address the requirements detailed in the Standards Manual for Drainage Design and Floodplain Management, SMDDFM, 14.2.6.

6. Proposed fills in excess of two feet above existing grade at any location in the outer one hundred feet of the developing site adjacent to residentially zoned property require the procedure outlined in Development Standard 11-01.8.1. This process must be complete prior to Grading Plan approval.

7. Proposed developments disturbing areas exceeding 1 acre are subject to AzPDES requirements.

8. All proposed easements must be shown in a surveyable manner on the Final Plat.

9. Site plan approval will be required after the tentative plat has been approved. This requires the site (yellow) permit application card to be filled out and processed at the permit counter, an activity number will be generated at this time. Once an activity number has been issued to the project the City of Tucson approved tentative plat must be approved through each review section; Zoning, Landscape, Engineering and Fire.


The next submittal must address the following items:

TENTATIVE PLAT

1. Remove the final plat dedication verbiage from the lower right hand corner of the first sheet, A1.1. The dedication notation is only required to be on the final plat.

2. The required information found in Development Standard 2-03.2.1.G. must be in the lower right hand lower of the first sheet where the final plat verbiage is located (See comment 1 above). Move the required information to where the final plat dedication verbiage is located. Remove the final plat verbiage as requested and lower the required information to this location.

3. It is recommended to begin listing the general notes in the upper left hand corner of the plat. It is also recommended to number each general plat note. Revise appropriately.

4. Provide in the upper right corner of the plat the north arrow, contour interval, and scale placed together on each sheet. D.S. 2-03.02.1. H.

5. Identify C.O. in the legend. DS 2-03.2.1.J.

6. Include wall line weight in the legend. DS 2-03.2.1.J.

7. Place the subdivision case number S06-128 in the lower right hand corner of each sheet. DS 2-03.2.2.B.1.

8. Remove the subdivision case number S04-004 in the lower right hand corner of each sheet. DS 2-03.2.2.B.1.

9. Remove the dark shading that indicates the PAAL location. It is acknowledged that the purpose of the shading is to clearly indicate the footprint of the PAAL. However the dark shading minimizes plat clarity after photographic reduction (microfilming) for record-keeping purposes. Revise appropriately. DS 2-03.2.1.A.

10. The following note is provided twice, "The developer, any successors and assigns, will hold the City of Tucson, its officers, employees, and agents harmless from any and all claims for damages related to the use of this development as shown hereon, now and in the future, by reason of flooding, flowage, erosion, or damage caused by water, whether surface flood or rainfall." Remove the second note it begins with "I the undersigned, do here by…." This notation that begins with "I, the undersigned, do here by…" belongs on the final plat. D.S. 2-03. 2.2 C. 1.

11. It is recommended for plat clarity to provide the "roof down spout" general note with the plat general notes located on the left side of the plat.

12. It appears a PAAL has been provided on the site plan. However there is a general note that indicates a private street is proposed. This is confusing. If a private street is proposed, the street must meet the minimum street requirements found in DS 3-01. Clarify in the response letter and revise sheet A1.1 to provide a street or indicate in the general note, "Total miles of new public streets are 0." "Total miles of new private streets are 0."

13. Glenn Street is designated as a collector street per the Major Street and Route Plan which requires the plat to provide the following note, "Lots with frontage on a street designated a Major Street or Route shall have ingress-egress designed in a manner so that motor vehicles do not back out onto the Major Street or Route, through the use of circular drives, turnarounds, or other similar solutions." D.S. 2-03. 2.2.D.2.

14. Provide the following note, "Any relocation or modification of existing utilities and/or public improvements necessitated by the proposed development will be at no expense to the public." D.S. 2-03. 2.2.D.2.E.

15. In compliance with state law, a tentative plat cannot be approved unless there is an assured water supply to the proposed subdivision as certified by the Arizona Department of Water Resources. One (1) of the following notes will be provided on the plat, as applicable.

1. "This subdivision is within the planned water service area of the Tucson
Water Department which is designated by the Arizona Department of Water
Resources as having an assured water supply."

2. "This subdivision is not within the planned water service area of the Tucson
Water Department but is within the service area of (list name of water
utility) which is designated by the Arizona Department of Water Resources
as having an assured water supply." (If this note applies, a certification
letter from the Arizona Department of Water Resources is required at the
time of tentative plat submittal.)

Provide the applicable note to the tentative plat. DS 2-03.2.2.G.

16. All existing easements will be drawn on the plat, and recordation information, locations, widths, and purposes shall be included. Describe on the plat the purpose of the existing 16' easement (Book 6 Page 91). D.S. 2-03. 2.2.3.C.

17. If the easement is not in use and proposed for abandonment, so indicate. Blanket easements should be listed in the notes, together with recordation data and their proposed status. Revise if applicable. D.S. 2-03. 2.2.3.C.

18. Provide the following existing Right of Way (ROW) information for Glenn Street; width, curb location and recordation data (book and page). Dimension from street centerline the existing ROW width and existing curb location and provide the recordation data for Glenn Street. Label appropriately. DS 2-03.2.3.D.

19. Remove the reference to the County in the paragraph that provides the basis of elevation data. DS 2-03.2.3.F.

20. If applicable show existing storm drainage facilities on and adjacent to the site. D.S. 2-03. 2.2.3.G.

21. It is acknowledged that leaders are provided on the plat to indicate where the existing building to be demolished is located. The locations of structures to be demolished must be clearly indicated on the plat. It is not clear where exactly the structure Is located. For clarity use a different line weight to show the footprint of the structure to be demolished. Include line weight in the legend. DS 2-03.2.1.J., DS 2-03.2.3.H.

22. After reviewing an aerial photo there appears to be existing walls that surround the property. Existing structures that effect the development must be shown on the plat. Clarify in the response letter if wall surround the property and revise the plat to show any existing walls. If there are wall openings indicate the location and size. DS 2-03.2.3.H.

23. Provide a bearing and dimension for the lot line in between lot 1 and lot 4. DS 2-03.2.4.A.

24. All proposed easements (utility, sewer, drainage, access, etc.) are to be dimensioned and labeled as to their purposes and whether they will be public or private. Indicate with the proposed TEP easement if it is public or private. D.S. 2-03. 2.2.4.J.

25. It is acknowledged that a proposed private cross access and utility easement has been called out on the plat. However the full extent of the easement must be clearly indicated on the plat. If a symbol is used provide the symbol in legend. Revise appropriately. D.S. 2-03. 2.2.4.J.

26. Handicap curb access ramps are required to be constructed with truncated domes, per recent a Federal ADA requirement. Show a detail or add a general note to the site plan indicating all public and private handicap curb access ramps will have truncated domes.

27. Remove the paving notes (A4) and the site notes (B3) and provide these notes on sheet C1.4 the grading plan.

28. Provide the off site to on site 100 year discharge and the on site to off site 100 year discharge on the plan. Show the location and the discharge amount (cfs). DS 2-03.2.4.L.7.

29. Additional comments could be forthcoming depending on how each comment has been addressed.
07/07/2006 JOSE ORTIZ COT NON-DSD TRAFFIC Denied July 7, 2006
ACTIVITY NUMBER: S06-128
PROJECT NAME: Glenn Duplexes
PROJECT ADDRESS: ??
PROJECT REVIEWER: Jose E. Ortiz PE, Traffic Engineer


Resubmittal Required: Traffic Engineering does not recommend approval of the Tentative Plat; therefore a revised Tentative Plat is required for resubmittal.

The following items must be revised or added to the plat.

1. Call out and dimension the existing right of way. In addition, dimension the width of the proposed/existing pavement and curbs. (DS 2-03.2.3.D)

2. The future SVTs shall be projected from the future edge of pavement (not from future ROW).

3. Is the address of this site at 3514 E. Glenn or at 3414 E. Glenn as indicated on the plat's title block?




If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-4259 x305 or Jose.Ortiz@tucsonaz.gov
07/07/2006 KAY MARKS PIMA COUNTY ADDRESSING Denied 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL
TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207

KAY MARKS
ADDRESSING OFFICIAL
PH: 740-6480
FAX #: 740-6370


TO: CITY PLANNING
FROM: KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL
SUBJECT: S06-128 GLENN DUPLEXES/TENTATIVE PLAT
DATE: 7/07/06



The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and the following matters must be resolved prior to our approval:

On Location Map change Mark A 27, 84 to 4, 89, delete the p from Binghampton Addition of Mark J, change 35, 79 Midtown Condos to Blacklidge Manor 39, 9 of Mark Q and change 16, 79 to 36, 37 of Mark SS.

Title Block should include lots 1-5.

Legal Description should read: A Resubdivision of Lot 4, Block 2…..

Delete 3414 E. Glenn St. from Title Block.

Add suffix of Street to Glenn on Sheet A1.1.

Correct Palo Verde Blvd. to Palo Verde Avenue on Sheet A1.1.

Correct Grant Rd. to Grant Road on Sheet A1.1.

Delete S04-004 and label S06-128 on all sheets.

Delete “Lot 3” from Legal Description in Luc Code Data5 (sheet 1).

Renumber unit numbers. Each lot will have to be assigned an address with Unit 1 and Unit 2.
07/12/2006 FRODRIG2 OTHER AGENCIES PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS Approved Daily trips - 59
07/12/2006 FRODRIG2 PIMA COUNTY WASTEWATER Denied July 12, 2006

TO: Rick Bright
Bright / Kliman Architects

THRU: Patricia Gehlen
City of Tucson, Development Services Department

FROM: Dickie Fernández, E.I.T.
Pima County Development Services Department
Development Review Division (Wastewater)

SUBJECT: Glenn Duplexes
Tentative Plat – 1st Submittal
S06-128


The proposed sewer collection lines to serve the above-referenced project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use.


Provide a letter from PCWWM Planning Services, written within the past 90 days, stating that treatment and conveyance system capacity for this project is available. A capacity request form may be found at http://www.pima.gov/wwm/forms/docs/CapResponseRequest.pdf.

ALL SHEETS. Add the project number, S06-128, to the title block of each sheet. This number should be shown larger or bolder than any cross-reference numbers.

Based on the evaluation of the proposed sewer design, this project qualifies for Standard sewer connection fee rates.

Please familiarize yourself with Pima County Development Services Department’s requirements for wastewater related matters on projects of this type. You may access informational materials via www.pimaxpress.com. Several General Notes and design matters need to be address on this project.

Clearly show what sewers are existing and which sewers are proposed (if any). Make sure a legend defines applicable existing public sewers, any applicable existing private sewers and any applicable proposed private sewers.

Show the size of the existing private sewers and label them with the initials BCS (Building Connection Sewer).

Show the size and Pima County plan number for the existing public sewers. If this is already shown, please disregard this comment.

Show the length, size and slope of any proposed private sewers. This does not apply to the HCSs that connect each individual home to the existing/proposed private sewers.

For reference purposes, provide a number to all on-site cleanouts, and indicate if they are existing or proposed, as well as providing the rim and invert elevations.

We will require a revised set of drawings and a response letter addressing each comment. Additional comments may be made during the review of these documents.

The next submittal of this project will be the 2nd submittal. A check for the review fee of this submittal in the amount of $100.00 made out to PIMA COUNTY TREASURER must accompany the revised set of bluelines and response letter.

For any questions regarding the fee schedule, please go to http://www.pimaxpress.com/SubDivision/Documents/Fees.PDF where you may find the appropriate wastewater review fees at the bottom of page 1. If the number of sheets changes, please adjust the review fee accordingly.


If you have any questions regarding the above mentioned comments, please contact me. Sincerely,





Dickie Fernández, E.I.T.
Telephone: (520) 740-6947

Copy: Project
07/20/2006 FRODRIG2 COT NON-DSD REAL ESTATE Denied S06-128 Glenn Duplexes: Tentative Plat Review - Request clarification if drawings are a site plan or tentative plat. No title report provided. Address in right hand legend needs correction. If dedication of R/W is by separate instrument, request application be obtained from this office.
07/20/2006 FRODRIG2 TUCSON WATER NEW AREA DEVELOPMENT REVIEW Passed
07/21/2006 PATRICIA GEHLEN ZONING-DECISION LETTER REVIEW Denied COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES

July 21, 2006

Rick Bright
Bright/Kliman Architects
1661 North Swan Suite 128
Tucson, AZ 85712

Subject: S06-128 Glenn Duplexes Tentative Plat

Dear Rick:

Your submittal of June 8, 2006 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a DETAILED cover letter explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed:

ALL BLUELINES MUST BE FOLDED

10 Copies Revised Tentative Plat ( ESD, TEP, Addressing, Wastewater, Traffic, Real Estate, Landscape, Engineering, Zoning, DSD)

4 Copies Revised Landscape Plan (Landscape, Zoning, Engineering, DSD)







Should you have any questions, please call me at 791-5608 ext. 1179.

Sincerely,


Patricia Y. Gehlen
CDRC Manager

All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/
Via fax: 292-1142