Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Plan Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Plan Number - S06-125
Review Name: TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 06/06/2006 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 06/09/2006 | TOM MARTINEZ | OTHER AGENCIES | AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION | Approved | NO COMMENT S06-125 AMERICA BUILT DEVELOPMENT INC RINCON KNOLLS -------------------------------------------------------- Confidentiality and Nondisclosure Notice: This email transmission and any attachments are intended for use by the person(s)/entity(ies) named above and may contain confidential/privileged information. Any unauthorized use, disclosure or distribution is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by e-mail, and delete or destroy all copies plus attachments. |
| 06/13/2006 | JCLARK3 | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Approved | * No known landfill with in 1000 feet of this development. * All lots have curbside frontage. Approved for APC curbside service. APC's are to be placed and removed from the collection area on the day of service. |
| 06/15/2006 | JIM EGAN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Denied | Please add the following notes to the plan. 1. Additional fire hydrants shall be provided by the developer as required by the fire code in accordance with C.O.T. Standards. 2. An approved water supply capable of supplying the projected fire flow for fire protection shall be provided and extended to serve directly any and all subdivided properties. 3. "NO PARKING FIRE LANE" signs shall be provided as needed to provide 20' clear unobstructed width along all fir apparatus access roadways in accordance with the fire code. 4. On street parking shall be prohibited on one side of Tortoise Pointe Place and signs shall be installed so indicating. |
| 06/22/2006 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | The Landscape Section does not recommend approval of the plans at this time due to inconsistencies with adopted codes and standards. The plan was reviewed for compliance with the Land Use Code (LUC), Development Standards (DS) and other applicable standards and guidelines referred to in the comments. Revise the plans as necessary to comply. The project is may also be subject to conditions of rezoning. Revise the plans and notes as necessary to comply with any applicable conditions. 1) An Environmental Resource Report (ERR) per Development Standard 1-07.0 is required. The Environmental Resource Report submittal must contain: A) an inventory, B) a composite map, and C) a conceptual grading plan. DS 1-07 Exhibit III.II 2) An aerial photograph, taken within a maximum of three (3) years of submittal, is required at a minimum 1" = 100' delineating the natural resource values for areas on the site and the area(s) to be set aside. DS 2-15.3.5 3) Show the NUOS and NROS boundaries on the landscape plans. C9-06-07 4) Provide revegetation and planting information for the NROS areas on the landscape plans. C9-06-07 5) Revise the native plant preservation plan to list the area (in square feet) of NUOS & NROS. LUC 3.8.6.4.B, C9-06-07 6) The landscape plan must include the following grading Information per DS 2-07.2.2.B: a) Grade changes across the site indicated by one (1) foot interval contour lines or by spot elevations. b) Percent slope across the site and the direction of the slope of paved areas. c) Existing grades on adjacent rights-of-way and adjacent sites and proposed finish grades. d) Limits of grading. Indicate natural contours of undisturbed areas. e) Areas of detention/retention, depths of basins, and percentage of side slope or slope ratio. f) Water harvesting areas. g) Percent side slope or slope ratio of berms 7) Revise the landscape plan to show the entire site. DS 2-07.2.1. 8) Revise the plans to show the location and improvements required for the Pantano Riverpark Corridor Trail. C9-06-07 9) A separate native plant preservation plan will be required prior to the construction Rincon Knolls Loop. Contact Gary Wittwer of TDOT for additional information. LUC 3.8.3.1. 10) Revise the tentative plat to show NUOS and NROS areas. Any common area labeled as NUOS is required to match the NUOS area required on the plat. Any common area identified as NUOS is to include only natural areas. C9-06-07 11) Revise the landscape plan to identify lots by number and Common Areas by letter designation. DS 2-07.2.1 12) Show any easements (utility, trail, etc.) on the landscape and native plant preservation plans. 13) Revise the plan to reference any of the following special overlay zones that are applicable, and add a note stating that the plat is designed to meet the overlay zone(s) criteria and note the case file number, date of approval, and any conditions of approval. DS 2-03.2.2.B.7 14) The plat is subject to the Hillside Development Zone. Provide the required plan information per DS 2-12. and 9-04. and revise as necessary to comply with LUC 2.8.1. 15) The project is subject to the provisions of the Watercourse, Amenities, Safety, and Habitat Ordinance, a separate application and review is required. TCC 23-12. |
| 06/22/2006 | FRODRIG2 | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Denied | Pima County Wastewater Management Department Michael Gritzuk, P.E. Director 201 N. Stone Ave., 8th Floor Tucson, Arizona 85701 (520) 740-6500 Visit our website: http://www.pima.gov/wwm July 3, 2006 TO: Merwin Yellowhair, P.E., AmericaBuilt Development THRU: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Project Manager City of Tucson Development Services Department FROM: ____________________________________ Tim Rowe, P.E. (520-740-6547), Development Services Engineer Pima County Wastewater Management Department SUBJECT: Rincon Knolls, Lots 1-500 and Common Areas A-B Tentative Plat – 1st Submittal S06-125 The proposed sewer collection lines to serve the above-referenced project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use. As we discussed in our meeting Friday morning with James Summerset of AmericaBuilt Development and Bob Decker, PCWMD's Development Services Section Manager: This subdivision may not be sewered using the public gravity sewers, and five publicly maintained conventional sewage pumping stations and force mains shown on this submittal. The PCWMD will not accept such a sewage collection system into its public sewer system. Nor, may the homeowner's association of this subdivision be burdened with the maintenance of private gravity sewers and five privately maintained conventional lift stations. The PCWMD believes that a privately maintained alternative sewer collection system, such as a vacuum sewer collection system, or low pressure sewer collection system is the best solution for sewering this property. Please be aware that private sewers are not typically allowed to be installed within in public streets, so the on-site streets may need to be privately maintained as well. The Pima County Development Services Department may not approve a tentative plat submittal for this project showing private sewer lines within the public streets of this subdivision without first receiving written authorization from the City of Tucson Transportation Department for the private sewers to be in the public streets. If AmericaBuilt is unable to obtain such authorization from the City of Tucson Transportation Department, the on-site streets will need to be privately maintained. As we discussed, should AmericaBuilt propose a low pressure sewer collection system, the PCWMD will require the following: The off-site sewer across the State land to the west will need to be public. The short on-site gravity sewer outfall line to be private. A Bohn biofilter be installed for odor control at the manhole where the low pressure sewer system will discharge into the private gravity sewer. A site for a chemical injection station, should one become necessary. This subdivision to discharge to the public sewer system in accordance with the terms and conditions of a PCWMD Industrial Wastewater Control (IWC) Permit that will require routine monitoring of the liquid and gaseous phase sulfide levels, pH, BOD, TSS and other parameters as determined necessary by PCWMD's IWC Permitting Staff. PCWMD will use the monitoring results for determining if the homeowner's association will need to use chemical injection to prevent corrosion and/or odor concerns in the off-site public sewer system. If you wish to discuss the above comments, please contact me at the phone number provided above, under my signature. Copy: Project June 20, 2006 TO: Ron Peetz AmericaBuilt Development, Inc. THRU: Patricia Gehlen City of Tucson, Development Services Department FROM: Dickie Fernández, E.I.T. Pima County Development Services Department Development Review Division (Wastewater) SUBJECT: Rincon Knolls, Lots 1-500 and Common Areas A & B Tentative Plat – 1st Submittal S06-125 The proposed sewer collection lines to serve the above-referenced project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use. Provide a letter from PCWWM Planning Services, written within the past 90 days, stating that treatment and conveyance system capacity for this project is available. A capacity request form may be found at http://www.pima.gov/wwm/forms/docs/CapResponseRequest.pdf. ALL SHEETS. Add the project number, S06-125, to the title block of each sheet. This number should be shown larger or bolder than any cross-reference numbers. Based on the evaluation of the proposed sewer design, this project qualifies for Standard sewer connection fee rates. This project proposes connecting to an existing public sewer line 15 inches in diameter or larger. This existing public sewer line conveys high volumes of wastewater, therefore the owner, engineer and contractor shall be aware that a flow management plan may be required. The owner, engineer and contractor shall also be aware that Pima County Wastewater Management Department may require review of this project. SHEET 2. A section of proposed sewer is shown connecting to the existing public sewer network, however this section of proposed sewer does not convey the flow from any of the proposed 500 lots. This project is to show how the 500 lots discharge into the existing public sewer network. Please revise accordingly. SHEET 3. Provide sewer service to lots 1-3. SHEET 14. Tentative plats are to show all sewer infrastructure, including force mains and lift stations. Revise this sheet accordingly, and revise any other sheets that may be affected by this specific review comment. SHEET 17. The manhole number on the layout and the manhole number in the sewer manhole table do not match. Revise accordingly. SHEET 2-17. Show the length, size and slope for the proposed public sewer. We will require a revised set of drawings and a response letter addressing each comment. Additional comments may be made during the review of these documents. The next submittal of this project will be the 2nd submittal. A check for the review fee of this submittal in the amount of $700.00 made out to PIMA COUNTY TREASURER must accompany the revised set of bluelines and response letter. For any questions regarding the fee schedule, please go to http://www.pimaxpress.com/SubDivision/Documents/Fees.PDF where you may find the appropriate wastewater review fees at the bottom of page 1. If the number of sheets changes, please adjust the review fee accordingly. If you have any questions regarding the above mentioned comments, please contact me. Sincerely, Dickie Fernández, E.I.T. Telephone: (520) 740-6947 Copy: Project |
| 06/27/2006 | KAY MARKS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Denied | 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 KAY MARKS ADDRESSING OFFICIAL PH: 740-6480 FAX #: 740-6370 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL SUBJECT: S06-125 RINCON KNOLLS/TENTATIVE PLAT DATE: JUNE 27, 2006 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and the following matters must be resolved prior to our approval: Correct Mary Ann Cleaveland Way to Mary Ann Cleveland Way on Location Map and sheet 1 Sheet layout. Correct Maryann Cleveland to Mary Ann Cleveland Way on sheet 2. Label Cienega Knolls Loop on sheet 2. Label Millicent Trail on sheet 2. Correct Rocking Lazy A Ranch Circle to Rocking Lazy A Ranch Place on sheets 1, 4, 5 and label on sheet 3. Label Rincon Knolls Loop on sheet 4. Label Pantano Knolls Drive on sheet 8. Complete the lot numbers on sheet 9. Correct Andam Camp Trail Circle to Adam Camp Trail on sheet 1. 10.) Correct Adam Camp Trail Circle to Adam Camp Trail on sheets 10 & 11. 11.) Label Tortoise Point Place on sheet 13. 12.) The break between Tortoise Canyon Lane and Tortoise Point Drive will be at the intersection with Tortoise Point Place. Please label as such. 13.) Label Lightening Ranch Lane on sheet 15. 14.) Label Rincon Knolls Loop adjacent to lot 166 on sheet 15. 15.) Correct Armold Ranch Road to Arnold Ranch Road on sheet 16. 16.) Correct Diane Ranch Place to Diane Ranch Road on sheet 1 and label on sheet 16. 17.) Complete all lot numbers on sheet 17. jg |
| 07/07/2006 | JOSE ORTIZ | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Denied | July 7, 2006 ACTIVITY NUMBER: S06-125 PROJECT NAME: Rincon Knolls-TP PROJECT ADDRESS: 10495 S Millicent Trail PROJECT REVIEWER: Jose E. Ortiz PE, Traffic Engineer Resubmittal Required: Traffic Engineering does not recommend approval of the Tentative Plat; therefore a revised Tentative Plat is required for resubmittal. The following items must be revised or added to the plat. 1. Include a response letter with the next submittal that states how all comments have been addressed. 2. On sheet 2 illustrate the locations of the right hand turn deceleration lane and the left turn lane from Mary Ann Cleavelend Way onto Rincon Knolls Loop. 3. The proposed development will generate more then the minimum 100 peak hour trips therefore a Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) shall be required to address the possible improvement needs along Mary Ann Cleavelend Way. This plat will not be approved until Traffic is in receipt of the required TIA. 4. Provide Cul-De-Sac dimensions per Development Standard (DS) 3.01.0 figure 20 & 21. 5. Provide dimensions for Right of Way and knuckle design per DS 3.01 figure 22. 6. Parking is not allowed in cul-de-sacs from PRC to PRC. So indicate on the plans by showing no parking signs on the plans. (DS 3-01.0 fig 20) (straight cul) 7. Parking is not allowed in cul-de-sacs from PRC to the point opposite the PRC. So indicate on the plans by showing no parking signs on the plans. (DS 3-01.0 fig 21) (bent cul) 8. Sheet 18 the curve table does not include data after C30. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-4259 x305 or Jose.Ortiz@tucsonaz.gov |
| 07/10/2006 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | July 10, 2006 To: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC/Zoning Manager From: Loren Makus, Senior Engineering Associate Re: S06-125 Rincon Knolls, Tentative Plat (First Review) Resubmittal Required: Revised Tentative Plat, Revised Drainage Report, Preliminary Development Plan. The Tentative Plat and Drainage Report have been reviewed by the Engineering Division. The Tentative Plat and Drainage report cannot be approved at this time. The following concerns must be addressed fully before the project can be approved. Tentative Plat Comments: 1. Provide a copy of the preliminary development plan as indicated in rezoning condition 1. 2. Clearly delineate on the Tentative Plat the location of each WASH ordinance watercourse, the floodplain associtated with each watercourse the banks and the study area for each watercourse.If any disturbance is proposed for any part of the study area, a complete WASH submittal will be required. The WASH submittal must follow the DSD full notice procedure. 3. A complete Hillside Development Zone (HDZ) submittal and review is required for this project. Clearly delineate the areas for which the Average Cross Slope is less than 15 per cent. Note that in the equation for the ACS after the natural areas have been set aside, the area must reflect the area of the project less the area of the natural set aside. 4. In all areas of the Tentative Plat ensure that enough contours are labeled to prevent ambiguity. For example, the contours in the area on the bottom of Sheet 8 are not clearly labeled. 5. Provide labeled spot elevations at various locations in the streets. Confirm that lots will drain as described. For example lot 468 indicates that it will drain to the street but the manhole in the street has a rim elevation higher than the lot. 6. The Tentative Plat indicates the use of CMP in the public right-of-way. Department of transportation standards require the use of Reinforced Concrete in all drainage structures in the public street. Revise the plan to idicate RCP or other concrete structures. 7. The Tentative Plat shows a proposed cut of as much as 10 feet in boundary lots for the Subdivision. (See Lots 1-3) Revise the Tentative Plat to provide more reasonable proposed pad elevations. Note that cut and fill slopes must be set back at least two feet from the project boundary. These lots also indicate that they will drain uphill to the street. 8. In other areas with significant proposed cut or fill provide details showing how the lots will transition from the proposed pad grade to the adjacent natural areas. 9. Clearly delineate the areas that are to remain natural and undisturbed. Show how grading on lots adjacent to the natural areas will be achieved without disturbance of the proposed natural areas. For example Lot 500 has a pad grade that is 5 feet higher than the low corner of the lot. 10. Clarify the symbol shown through Common Area B on Sheets 7 and 8. It appears to be a drainage structure but is labelled a wildlife corridor. 11. Sheet 8 of the Tentative Plat seems to indicate proposed retaining walls that will be up to 27 feet tall. The Land Use Code limits the total height of retaining walls in perimeter yards to 10 feet. This includes the height of any patio wall or fence on top of the retaining wall. Revise the tentative plat to be consistent with the LUC. 12. The calculated grading limits and NUOS boundaries from the last two pages of the Tentative Plat must be drawn on the tentative plat. The survey data may appear on the last two sheets. 13. Provide details or explanations for the transistions between adjacent lots where proposed pad grades are have a difference greater than a foot. 14. Provide details for the filled road beds that cross ravines. Indicate the side slopes for the fill areas and indicate on the plan the extent of the proposed run out. 15. There are several locations where the differential grading requirements of the grading development standard are not met. For example lot 474 has a pad grade that is as much as 15 feet above the lowest existing corner. Generally fills in the outer 100 feet of the project must be no greater than 2 feet in depth. 16. Note that on T-intersections sight visibility triangles are required only along the through street. 17. Show discharge quantities for the locations where culverts and scuppers are proposed. Drainage Report Comments: 18. Clarify Figure 3 to show any offsite drainage entering the site from the east boundary. Provide an exhibit showing the existing drainage areas that may affect the site. For example, clearly indicate the project boundaries on figure 5. Provide sufficient topographical detail to substantiate the conclusions. 19. Clarify the basin nomenclature in figure 5 and in related discussions and calculations to indicate which drainage areas are on the site and which are in areas that will not be developed. 20. Clarify the general conditions discussed on page 5. The narrative indicates that there are both 5 and 6 major drainageways on site. The discussions do not address the most significant drainage mentioned on the top of page 4. 21. Provide discussions establishing the 500-foot setback from the Pantano Wash. 22. Fully discuss the delineation of the WASH study areas in the drainage report. I strongly recommend that we meet to discuss these comments before the project is resubmitted. I can be reached at loren.makus@tucsonaz.gov or at 520.791.5550 ext 1161. Loren Makus, E.I.T. Senior Engineering Associate Engineering Division |
| 07/13/2006 | LIZA CASTILLO | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Approved | 4350 E. Irvington Road, Tucson, AZ 85714 Post Office Box 711, Tucson, AZ 85702 WR# 164085 July 12, 2006 Wycozona ATTN: Mr. Merwin Yellowhair 5255 E. Williams Circle Suite 6000W Tucson, AZ 85711 Dear Mr. Yellowhair: SUBJECT: RINCON KNOLLS Lots 1-500 S06-125 Tucson Electric Power Company (TEP) has no objection to the preliminary plat submitted for review June 6, 2006. The preliminary point where TEP will serve this project is from the possible feeds existing from the pole line to the north and also from duct stubs (one on the west side of Cienega Rd. and the other from a J-2 on Millicent Trail. Okay to use these feeds since both are within public road right-of-way. Offsite easements and state land lease will be required for feeds off the pole line to the north on state land. Enclosed is a copy of TEP’s facility map showing the approximate location and unit numbers of the existing facilities. Also enclosed is a copy of the tentative plat showing where TEP will be placing the aboveground equipment for this subdivision. This is not a preliminary design. TEP has provided this drawing to show where the proposed locations are for transformers and pedestals. TEP will provide a preliminary electrical design on the Approved Tentative Plat within thirty (30) working days upon receipt of the plat. Additional plans necessary for preparation of the design are: building plans including water, electrical, landscape, sidewalk and paving plans. Also, submit the AutoCAD version of the plat on a CD or email to Aslusser@tep.com. Should you have any questions, please contact your Designer, Frank Grijalva at (520) 918-8361. Sincerely, Ann Slusser Scheduling Coordinator Design/Build Enclosures cc: P. Gehlen, City of Tucson (by e-mail) F. Grijalva, TEP F. Rodriguez, City of Tucson (by e-mail) |
| 07/18/2006 | FRODRIG2 | COT NON-DSD | REAL ESTATE | Denied | S06-125 Rincon Knolls: Tentative Plat Review: Sht. 2 of 20, request status of 120' wide R/W that is within State Trust land. |
| 07/19/2006 | ROGER HOWLETT | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Denied | DEPARTMENT OF URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT S06-125 Rincon Knolls Tent. Plat 07/18/06 (X) Tentative Plat () Development Plan (X) Landscape Plan () Revised Plan/Plat () Board of Adjustment () Other CROSS REFERENCE: C9-06-07 Wycozona – Mary Ann Cleveland Way MASTER PLAN: Houghton Area Master Plan (H.A.M.P.) GATEWAY ROUTE: No COMMENTS DUE BY: July 5, 2006 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: () No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment () Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions () RCP Proposal Complies With Plan Policies (X) See Additional Comments Attached () No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: (X) Resubmittal Required: (X) Tentative Plat () Development Plan (X) Landscape Plan (X) Other – Model Elevations and Color Palette REVIEWER: msp 791-4505 DATE: July 5, 2006 Department of Urban Planning and Design (DUPD) Comments S06-125 – Rincon Knolls – Tentative Plat July 5, 2006 The site is subject to rezoning case C9-06-07, conditions 1 through 33. The following are DUPD’s comments, as it relates to compliance to rezoning C9-06-07 requirements. Staff suggests the applicant contact the Department of Urban Planning and Design to arrange a meeting to discuss these revisions prior to re-submittal. Staff (Manuel Padilla or Roger Howlett) can be reached at 791-4505 to arrange meeting: A requirement of rezoning condition number #2, is for the site to have a unified landscaping theme, that includes an entry statement at MAC Way and the northern exit point. The tentative plat, landscape plan does not provide a landscape entry statement at MAC Way, nor at the northern exit point. Please revise submittal to comply with rezoning condition # 2. Rezoning condition # 7 requires a Category II Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA). Staff requests to see how the MAC Way entryway statement/improvements and the northern access point are addressed by the TIA. Please include the required TIA in the resubmittal. As part of the tentative plat process, rezoning condition # 9 requires the owner/developer to design and construct the Pantano River Park corridor (Trail #5). The tentative plat and landscape plan does not include information to review for compliance of this condition. Please revise submittal to comply with the requirements of rezoning condition # 9. Rezoning condition # 20 requires a native canopy tree within ten feet of the front property line on every other lot, on every street within the development. Please landscape plan, sheet 1 of 9, note #13 to state verbatim the language of rezoning condition #20. Rezoning condition # 11 & 12 requires the temporary construction and the NUOS boundary fences to be placed under the supervision of a registered land surveyor and upon completion of this work, registered land surveyor to certify by letter that fencing meets rezoning conditions # 11 & 12. Please revise landscape plan, sheet 1 of 9, note 9 to include rezoning condition # 11 & 12 language (verbatim) as part of the fencing information. Rezoning condition # 13 requires wildlife-friendly culvert systems that assimilates the natural base of the wash to be located beneath all road crossings in delineated wildlife corridors. Details of the culvert systems to be provided on the tentative plat. Please revise tentative plat to be in compliance with rezoning condition # 13. Please revise the tentative plat NUOS and NROS calculations to exclude square footage of land areas improved with Pocket Park and Trail amenities (Portions of Common Areas “B”). Please revise tentative plat and landscape plan to include Pocket Parks, on-site trails and Wildlife amenities as required by rezoning conditions # 15, 16, 17, & 18. Pocket Park requirements shall be adequately disbursed throughout the development (500 lots), within portions of Common Areas “B.” Wildlife requirements shall be located on designated (natural wildlife corridor alignments) Common Areas “B.” As per staff note #8 above, Pocket Parks shall be landscaped with thornless native trees, plants and shrubs. Pocket Parks shall have tot lots, turf area, a ramada with a table and benches, bar-be-que grills, and attached trash receptacles. All weather access shall be provided for pedestrian paths that connect the street sidewalk to all pocket park amenities. Please contact the Department of Development Services (DSD), Zoning Review Section to discuss and agree on methods by which rezoning condition # 19 will be tracked for compliance at the time of housing permit issuance. Please include documentation of agreement with DSD, to the Department of Urban Planning and Design at the time of resubmittal. Please revise tentative plat to be in compliance with rezoning condition # 21. Please include details building elevations, that include front façade (including roof treatment), shall be carried around to the side and/or rear of units abutting or adjacent to open space or public rights-of-way. Please revise tentative plat to be in compliance with rezoning condition # 22, which requires that no two adjacent residential units shall have the identical model façade, color scheme, or garage setbacks. The concept of a variety of model types shall be distributed throughout each of the seven proposed neighborhoods to ensure a mixture of physical appearances. Prior to tentative plat approval, rezoning condition # 28, requires a Desert Tortoise survey to be completed, followed by on-site supervision of site grading if Desert Tortoises are found on-site. Please provide documentation to the Department of Urban Planning and Design that this condition is in compliance, as determined by Leslie Liberti (791-4505), from the Office of Conservation and Sustainable Development (OCSD). |
| 07/20/2006 | FRODRIG2 | OTHER AGENCIES | PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS | Approved | Transportation Information for Rezoning, Subdivision and Development Review Requests File Number Description Date Reviewed E Pima Association of Governments Kristen Zimmerman, Data Services 177 N. Church Avenue, Suite 405 Tucson, AZ 85701 Phone: (520) 792-1093 Fax: (520) 620-6981 www.pagnet.org S06-125 Rincon Knolls 6/30/2006 This analysis is designed to allow jurisdictional planning departments to further assess the traffic impacts of planned residential and commerical developments that PAG expects will generate more than 500 average daily trips. Nearby roadway data include planned improvements, existing and future volumes and capacities, and bus and bike accessibility. 1. Nearest Existing or Planned Major Street 2. Is a street improvement planned as part of PAG's 5-Year Transportation Improvement Program? See http://www.pagnet.org/tip/ for more information on the TIP planning process. Planned Action: STREET IDENTIFICATION 3. Existing (2005) Daily Traffic Volume (reported in ADT) See http://www.pagnet.org/TPD/DataTrends/ for more information. 4. Existing (2005) Daily Capacity (reported in ADT) 5. Existing (2005) Number of Lanes 8. Future (2030) Number of Lanes TRANSIT AND BIKEWAYS CONSIDERATIONS 10. Present Bus Service (Route, Frequency, Distance) 11. Existing or Planned Bikeway Remarks: Street Number 1 Street Number 2, if applicable. Year Year Planned Action: VOLUME/CAPACITY/TRAFFIC GENERATION CONSIDERATIONS 6. Future (2030) Daily Volume (reported in ADT) (Assuming planned transportation improvement projects are completed.) 7. Future (2030) Daily Capacity (reported in ADT) Old Vail Rd (Houghton to Colossal Cave) No 0 3,165 23,300 2 23,300 23,189 2 4,785 None None 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9. Average daily traffic (ADT) forecasted as a result of the proposed development |
| 07/21/2006 | PGEHLEN1 | TUCSON WATER NEW AREA DEVELOPMENT | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 08/02/2006 | ED ABRIGO | PIMA COUNTY | ASSESSOR | Approved | Office of the Pima County Assessor 115 N. Church Ave. Tucson, Arizona 85701 BILL STAPLES ASSESSOR TO: CDRC Office Subdivision Review City of Tucson (FAX# 791-5559) FROM: Gary Ault, Mapping Supervisor Pima County Assessor’s Office Mapping Department DATE: July 3, 2006 RE: Assessor’s Review and Comments Regarding Tentative Plat S06-125 Rincon Knolls T161604 (305-06&10) * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * X Plat meets Assessor’s Office requirements. _______ Plat does not meet Assessor’s Office requirements. COMMENTS: Thank you for your submittal. Please make the following additions/corrections in the final plat. The title block must be in the lower right hand corner of the plat (on each sheet) and must include the name of the subdivision, the number of lots and the common areas, the sections, township and range (Section 9 must be included, since a portion of the subdivision dips down into that section) on sheet 1 as well as sheets 2-20. Add the interior bearings for the lot lines. Remove all shading and hatching. Add square footage for common areas to each sheet and where the areas are separated, provide the square footages for each separate piece. If there are any questions, please contact Susan King at 740-4391. NOTE: THE ASSESSOR’S CURRENT INVOLVEMENT IN PROCESSING ITS MANUAL MAPS TO DIGITAL FORMAT IS EXPEDITED GREATLY BY EXCHANGE OF DIGITAL DATA. IN THE COURSE OF RECORDING THIS SUBDIVISION YOUR ASSISTANCE IN PROVIDING THIS OFFICE WITH AN AUTOCAD COPY WOULD BE GREATLY APPRECIATED. THANK YOU FOR ANY DIGITAL DATA PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED. Susan King |
| 08/02/2006 | ROBERT YOUNG | PIMA COUNTY | PIMA CTY - DEV REVIEW | Passed | |
| 08/10/2006 | HEATHER THRALL | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Heather Thrall Senior Planner PROJECT: S06-125 Rincon Knolls Residential Cluster Project Subdivision Tentative Plat TRANSMITTAL DATE: August 8, 2006 DUE DATE: July 5, 2006 COMMENTS: This review is segmented into tentative plat, RCP and overlay comments. TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW COMMENTS 1. Section 4.1.7.1, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a tentative plat. If, at the end of that time, the tentative plat has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this tentative plat is June 5, 2007. 2. This project was reviewed for compliance with the Land Use Code (LUC), Development Standard (DS), American National Standard Institute (ANSI), and International Building Code 2003 (IBC). Specifically, this project was reviewed for compliance with DS 2-03 Tentative Plat content and LUC 3.6.1. for RCP requirements. 3. Per DS 2-03.2.1.G, provide a title block with subdivision name, lots, etc. on first sheet. 4. Per DS 2-03.2.2.A.1, list names, addresses, phone info of project owners/developers. 5. Per DS 2-03.2.2.B.1, list DSD assigned subdivision case "S06-125" in title block. 6. Per DS 2-03.2.2.B.1, correct rezoning case number to read C9-06-07 in title block. 7. Per DS 2-03.2.2.B.1, list annexation case C15-04-02 in title block. 8. Per DS 2-03.2.2.B.7, in general notes, list the following information as it pertains to overlay zones applicable to this site. " This project shall be developed to comply with requirements of the Hillside Development Zone, LUC 2.8.1". 9. Per DS 2-03.2.4.A, property line dimensions missing for many lots, appears curve data information is missing above C-31. Provide all lot dimensions on each lot and missing curve data in table form. 10. Per DS 2-02.2.4.C, with regards to common areas: A) In general notes, give break down of square footage for common areas A & B B) Throughout plat, show square footage of individual common areas. C) Clarify if any other common areas, i.e. recreation areas, are planned and call them out with a separate common area classification in the title block and on the plat. D) Sheet 2, is the area near lot 3 common area? Difficult to tell with many key lines. E) Sheet 14, is the area between lots 334 and 335 a common area? 11. Per DS 2-03.2.4.D, show zones around project, including Pima County zoning. List on large index map on sheet one and throughout the plat. 12. Per DS 2-03.2.4.E, clarify if the project will be phased. If so, provide phase lines and calculations for development for each phase and cumulative in phasing to overall development calculations (site coverage, density, etc.) Note, if separate phases, each phase will require a separate final plat submittal. 13. Per DS 2-03.2.4.G, with regards to streets: A) Provide ADT for each typical street cross section B) Provide sidewalk for cross section 4 on sheet 18 (alternative is to apply for DSMR) 14. Per DS 2-03.2.4.J, ensure all easements are shown on plat with respective purposes. Ensure access across State of Arizona land is provided for via an easement/agreement. RCP REVIEW COMMENTS 15. Per LUC RCP-4, the building setbacks required for the units on the perimeter of the subdivision are based upon the adjacent zoning classifications. Staff acknowledges the building setbacks listed, but will determine setbacks based upon adjacent zones in the resubmittal. 16. Per DS 2-10.3.1.B, Provide typical detail drawing for corner lot building setbacks. 17. Per DS 2-10.3.1.C and LUC RCP-4 requirements, the maximum overall site coverage permitted in the R-1 RCP is 50%. The calculations provided indicate 50.38% coverage, which is slightly over the allowed square footage. Revise. 18. Per DS 2-10.3.1.D, 25% of the total lots proposed must have barrier free access from the street to the front door of the unit. Provide note on first sheet which units will be barrier free. 19. Per DS 2-10.3.2.D, any lots under 4000 s.f. require staff to review building plans to determine the models opted can be built on such a small lot. Lot 433 is under 4000. 20. Provide copies of CCRS to ensure that all common areas are maintained. REZONING REVIEW COMMENTS: Per City of Tucson Rezoning case C9-06-07, please address the following: A) please submit a separate response letter explaining how conditions of rezoning will be met. B) Please provide a square footage breakdown of individual common areas to ensure comment 10 is addressed. C) Please revise the plat to show that a minimum of 50% of the subdivision area is open space, the calculations state 50.38% is planned for development D) Please revise comment 12 on the plan to meet the notes provided in the Mayor & Council meeting from May 18, 2006. E) Revise the first part of comment 14 to match Mayor & Council May 18 meeting. F) Advise where tot lots are by calling them out with separate common area designations. GENERAL NOTES/DETAILS REVIEW COMMENTS 21. Please revise general note 25 to reference LUC 2.3.4.2.A.3 for R-1 reference to RCP. 22. Provide truncated domes on all handicapped access ramps where transitioning from pedestrian refuge to vehicular use area. (provide on detail drawing and general note) 23. Review plan and provide handicapped access across streets where current handicapped ramps are proposed. Ensure equal and convenient accessibility throughout the subdivision for handicapped access. 24. Provide ADTs on all roadway cross-sections. 25. Typical detail 4 shows a sidewalk is missing (acknowledged for Tortoise place) for one side of the street. Staff acknowledges this side of the street would be abounding a desert vegetated common area identified as NROS. The sidewalk exclusion requires a Development Standard Modification Request (DSMR) to be approved. Contact Patricia Gehlen for DSMR review process information. An application can be found under www.tucsonaz.gov/dsd under forms. 26. Though building setbacks will be evaluated once the resubmittal declares the adjacent zones abutting the subdivision, note that the setback, if R-1 as well, is the greater of 10' or ¾ of the height of the exterior building wall, not 10 or 2/3 as noted. OVERLAY REVIEW COMMENTS 27. A separate Hillside Development Zone application and submittal is required for this project. Please see Engineering comments and contact Patricia Gehlen at 520-791-4541x1179 for further details on the submittal and overlay review process. 23. Staff also noted that this project is within a WASH ordinance wash area, which also requires a staff review. Please see Engineering comments and contact Patricia Gehlen at 520-791-4541x1179 for further details on the submittal and overlay review process. 24. Depending upon responses provided, further review comments may be forthcoming. 25. Contact me at Heather.Thrall@tucsonaz.gov or at 791-4541x1156 if you have questions. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call (520) 791-5608. C:\planning\cdrc\tentativeplat\S06-125 rincon knolls.doc RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised tentative plat, CC&R's and additional requested documents. |
| 08/10/2006 | GLENN HICKS | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Denied | DATE: August 16, 2006 TO: Ferne Rodriguez, Development Services FROM: Glenn Hicks Parks and Recreation 791-4873 ext. 215 Glenn.Hicks@tucsonaz.gov CC: SUBJECT: S06-125 Rincon Knolls: Tentative Plat(6-6-06) Denied until a site for the Pantano River Park is secured and plans for the river park are submitted and approved. |
| 08/17/2006 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES August 17, 2006 Ron Peetz. America Built Development Inc. 5255 Williams Circle Suite 6000W Tucson, AZ 85711 Subject: S06-125 Rincon Knolls Tentative Plat Dear Ron: Your submittal of June 06, 2006 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a DETAILED cover letter explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLUELINES MUST BE FOLDED 11 Copies Revised Tentative Plat ( Fire, Engineering, Addressing, DUPD, Wastewater, Traffic, Real Estate, Landscape, Parks and Recreation, Zoning, DSD) 6 Copies Revised Landscape Plan (Landscape, DUPD, Parks and Recreation, Zoning, Engineering, DSD) 2 Copies Revised NPPO Plans (Landscape, DSD) 2 Copies ERR (Landscape, DSD) 2 Copies Aerial Photograph (Landscape DSD) 2 Copies Revised Drainage Report (Engineering, DSD) 2 Copies Preliminary Development Plan (Engineering, DSD) 2 Copies Color Elevations (DUPD, DSD) Should you have any questions, please call me at 791-5608 ext. 1179. Sincerely, Patricia Y. Gehlen CDRC Manager All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: 790-2399 |