Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Plan Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Plan Number - S06-117
Review Name: TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 05/15/2006 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 05/16/2006 | JIM EGAN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | |
| 05/22/2006 | TOM MARTINEZ | OTHER AGENCIES | AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION | Approved | NO COMMENT S06-117 STANTEC WINGATE LOT 3 -------------------------------------------------------- Confidentiality and Nondisclosure Notice: This email transmission and any attachments are intended for use by the person(s)/entity(ies) named above and may contain confidential/privileged information. Any unauthorized use, disclosure or distribution is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by e-mail, and delete or destroy all copies plus attachments. |
| 05/26/2006 | ROGER HOWLETT | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Denied | DEPARTMENT OF URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT S06-117 Wingate Lot 3 05/25/06 (XXXX) Tentative Plat () Development Plan (XXXX) Landscape Plan () Revised Plan/Plat () Board of Adjustment () Other CROSS REFERENCE: NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: South Pantano GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: COMMENTS DUE BY: 06-13-06 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: () No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment () Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions () RCP Proposal Complies With Plan Policies () See Additional Comments Attached () No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: (XXXX) Resubmittal Required: (XXXX) Tentative Plat () Development Plan (XXXX) Landscape Plan (XXXX) Other – Color Elevations, Photos REVIEWER: D. Estolano 791-4505 DATE: 05/23/06 Because this project is being proposed as a Residential Cluster Project (RCP), it must comply with section 3.6.1 of the Land Use Code, specifically section 3.6.1.4 of the general development criteria. The RCP requires compliance with policies of the General Plan, the South Pantano Area Plan, and the Design Guidelines Manual. The Plans require community amenities, such as but not limited to; streetscapes with pedestrian oasis, common area(s) of appropriate land size(s) to sustain residential amenities for all. The City of Tucson General Plan and the Design Guidelines Manual address the importance of development that uses colors of the natural environment which include a variety of blended shades such as blues, yellows, oranges, greens, purples and reds. Applying a variety of these colors to this RCP would be consistent with the variety of colors surrounding the area. Please visit the Urban Planning and Design’s website link to view The Sonoran Desert Color Palette for Building Exteriors”: http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/planning/sonorandesertcolors.pdf, Please make a note on the plat that no two homes with the same façade or color scheme shall be placed next to one another. The Design Guidelines Manual states that side and rear building facades should be built with attention to architectural character and detail comparable to the front façade, particularly if rear and side facades are visible from streets or adjacent properties. Enhancement can include design treatments such a pop outs, color variation, etc. Massing of proposed structures to existing structures will also be a part of this review. The tentative plat should identify the height of existing structures that surround the project site. Please submit plans showing how the RCP will comply with these design requirements. Photos, dimensioned elevations, or a combination of both must be submitted The General Plan, and the Design Guidelines Manual encourages the creation of cooling microclimates along pedestrian paths that are internal to the subdivision. In order to provide such a microclimate it is required to provide a minimum of one fifteen (15) gallon tree, no more than ten (10) feet from the back of the sidewalk, on every other lot frontage. This should be shown on the landscape plan along with a note indicating such. Per DS 2-10.3.2.D, the lots within this project that are less than 4,000 square feet must submit the following: Floor plans or drawings of the footprint of each unit, showing exterior dimensions. Be certain that locations of second floors (if applicable), front entrances, and motor vehicle parking spaces are noted. These can be preliminary plans. To aide in the review it is helpful to provide building footprints drawn at the same scale as the tentative plat to check which models fit on which lots. Building elevations of all proposed units with height dimensions. A list of what model homes fit which lots. Unless a lot is planned for another use, each lot will be designed so that at least one of the model units fits on the lot in compliance with Code requirements. Lots 34 through 47 and lots 228 through 268 that incorporate walls that abut amenities such as designated open space areas, common areas, and trail systems, should meet the following criteria: the masonry portion of the wall does not exceed four (4) feet, eight (8) inches in height, except for pillars, with one (1) foot six (6) inch wrought iron or other similar open fencing materials on top. This is to provide security to those using the facility placing the “eyes of the community” on these areas. Please submit a detail on the tentative plat to indicate compliance with this requirement. Any proposed masonry screen wall around the perimeter of the subdivision, or within the development shall be constructed of, or painted with, graffiti-resistant materials. These screen walls shall incorporate one of the following decorative materials: tile, stone, brick, textured brick/block, a coarse-textured material such as stucco or plaster, or a combination of the above materials. Please identify the location of the walls. In addition, any continuous wall greater than 75 feet in length and three feet in height visible from the public right-of-way shall vary the wall alignment (jog, curve, notch, or setback, etc.) and include trees or shrubs in the voids created by the variations. Please provide a detail of all proposed walls in the development and indicate the materials that will be used. This site is within the South Pantano Area Plan, where there is a minimal amount of structured recreational space in the area. As such, the Plans call for innovative site design to include design elements of usable open space and active/passive recreational space and that those pedestrian facilities be accessible to the handicapped. [An active/passive adult recreational facility, which includes a tot lot with appropriate tot equipment and ground material]. The adult recreational amenities to include, but not limited to: ramada(s), table(s), outdoor grill, shaded sitting area(s). Ideally the recreation area should equal one (1) lot in size, but given this project proposes a detention basin, this basin can also serve a dual purpose with the placement of required amenities within and surrounding the basin. The slopes surrounding the basin must be adjusted to provide handicap accessibility to the amenities by way of an all-weather ADA compliant path that connects to the proposed sidewalks within the subdivision. To increase appearance, shade, and longevity diversity, please provide an appropriate amount of longer living and diverse shade producing trees, including evergreens that are in the Low water Use Drought Tolerant List. Also please do not locate any vegetation that has thorns at maturation in the recreation areas. Please indicate on either the tentative plat or landscape plan the location of these amenities. Please add to the tentative plat general notes a disclosure statement on the proximity of the Davis-Monthan Air Force Base. The disclosure statement shall indicate Davis-Monthan Air Force Base as a military installation where governmental approved activities occur which includes military air and ground training activities. Please add the identifying case number, S06-117, to all sheets of the Tentative Plat and Landscape Plans. |
| 06/01/2006 | PETER MCLAUGHLIN | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1) Add the CDRC subdivision case number (S06-117) to all sheets of the Tentative Plat, Landscape and NPP Plans. 2) Revise the math for saguaro (Carnegea gigantea) mitigation in Table 1 on sheet L2.01 to be correct and to match with the data given in the plant list on sheets N2.02 and N2.03. NOTE: At least fifty (50) percent of all viable saguaros shall be preserved in place or salvaged and transplanted on site per LUC 3.8.6.2.A.2. 3. The minimum required text size for microfilming of all plans is 12 point (0.12"). Revise the text for all native plant current location i.d. numbers on the NPP Plan aerial photo sheets to meet the minimum standard. Also, revise the text for the descriptions of plants on sheets 24, 25 and 26 of 33. Due to the use of different text size the headings for numbers 145 through 254 on sheet N 2.02 do not line up correctly with the other numbers in this coulumn. There is an extra comment heading that is only present for plant numbers 145 through 254. If available, provide this additional information for all other plants as well. DS 2-03.2.1.C 4) Two sheets are labeled as sheet N2.07 (sheet 29 of 33). One of these should be listed as sheet N2.09 (sheet 31 of 33). Revise. 5) Indicate the location of the required accessible active/passive recreational facilities within the project. If the recreational amenities are to be placed within the proposed detention basin, access slopes of 8:1 or flatter must be coordinated with these zones and there shall be a maximum of 100 feet to the base of an access slope or to a 4:1 basin side slope. Revise plans as necessary. Provide basin cross sections indicating the depths and slopes of detention basins on the landscape plan. DS 2-07.2.2.B Basin design is to be in accordance with DS 10-01 Refer to pp. 78 & 79 of the Stormwater Detention/Retention Manual for design criteria regarding basin slopes/depths. DS 10-01.3.6 DS 2-07.2.2.B 6) Revise the landscape plans to show the limits of grading. DS 2-07.2.2.B.5 7) Revise NPP plan aerials to show limits of grading and label location of fencing. Delineate the grading limits clearly on the plan to verify that all plants to be preserved can be retained in accordance with LUC 3.8.6.7.C. Include the grading limits for all areas where saquaros are to be preserved in place. 8) Clarify that the areas adjacent to sidewalks along public streets will be treated for dust control as required per LUC 3.7.2.4.A.4. DS 2-07.2.2.A.1.g 9) Refer to DS 2-07.2.2.B for the specific content for Grading Information required on the landscape plan. Grading information on the landscape plan shall include contour lines or spot elevations for the site, percent slope across the site and direction of slope of paved areas, slope ratios of detention/retention basin sides, and the methods by which water harvesting/ storm runoff is used to benefit planting areas on the site. 10) Add a general note on the NPPO plan specifying that the Plant Inventory Methodology was used as the selected method of NPPO compliance. LUC 3.8.4.1.A 11) Remove the landscape plan approval signature block on sheet 1 of 33. Upon approval, the plan will be stamped with the DSD approval stamp. 12) Dimension all street landscape borders on the landscape plan drawings and provide a calculation of the percentage of vegetative coverage. DS 2-07.2.2.A.2.f & .g 13) Include both the proper and common name of each type of plant material listed on the landscape plan. DS 2-07.2.2.A.1.d 14) Identify and locate on the landscape and native plant preservation plans all utility easements and facilities. DS 2-07.2.2.E 15) The tentative plat lists Common areas "B" and "C" only in the title block but the landscape plan indicates common areas "A", "B" and "C" in the title block. Revise to be consistent and label each common area individually with a separate letter designation. Enclose each with a solid line per DS 2-03.2.4.C . Add landscaping as one of the elements listed under common area "B" on the plat since the landscape borders shall be recorded as common area and maintained by the homeowners association, and the subdivision CC&Rs shall reference the maintenance standards in Sec. 3.7.6 . 15) The landscape plan shall include irrigation specification design and layout per DS 2-06.5.4.A & DS 2-06.5.4.B including sleeves for driveways and sidewalks, locations of valves, low-flow bubblers or drip irrigation. RESUBMITTAL OF ALL PLANS IS REQUIRED. |
| 06/05/2006 | JCLARK3 | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Approved | * Harrison Road landfill is over 1000 feet from this development. Landfill ordinance does not apply. * All lots have street side frontage. Approveds for APCC curbside service. APC's are to be placed and removed from the collection area on the day of service. |
| 06/06/2006 | LIZA CASTILLO | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Approved | SUBJECT: WINGATE LOT 3 Lots 1-337 S06-117 Tucson Electric Power Company (TEP) has no objection to the preliminary plat submitted for review May 15, 2006. The preliminary point where TEP will possibly serve this project is from the J-2 (Fwg-73) J-2 (FWG-72A), HC2-56, pole #1 and pole #246. Enclosed is a copy of TEP's facility map showing the approximate location and unit numbers of the existing facilities. The tentative plat showing where TEP will be placing the aboveground equipment for this subdivision will be sent under separate cover. This is not a preliminary design. TEP has provided this drawing to show where the proposed locations are for transformers and pedestals. TEP will provide a preliminary electrical design on the Approved Tentative Plat within Thirty (30) working days upon receipt of the plat. Additional plans necessary for preparation of the design are: building plans including water, electrical, landscape, sidewalk and paving plans. Also, submit the AutoCAD version of the plat on a CD or email to kclark@tep.com <mailto:lcastillo@tep.com> . Should you have any questions, please contact me the Designer for this project (name) at (520) 918-8271. Sincerely, Kathy Clark Scheduling Coordinator Design/Build kc Enclosures cc: P. Gehlen, City of Tucson T. Vickery, KB Homes (Letter only) F. Grijalva, Tucson Electric Power Co. Kathy Clark Scheduling Coordinator Design/Build 520-918-8271 kclark@tep.com |
| 06/07/2006 | FRODRIG2 | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Denied | June 7, 2006 TO: Ryan Stucki, P.E. Stantec Consulting THRU: Patricia Gehlen City of Tucson, Development Services Department FROM: Dickie Fernández, E.I.T. Pima County Development Services Department Development Review Division (Wastewater) SUBJECT: Wingate Lot 3, Lots 1-337 and Common Areas B & C Tentative Plat – 1st Submittal S06-117 The proposed sewer collection lines to serve the above-referenced project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use. Provide a letter from PCWWM Planning Services, written within the past 90 days, stating that treatment and conveyance system capacity for this project is available. A capacity request form may be found at http://www.pima.gov/wwm/forms/docs/CapResponseRequest.pdf. ALL SHEETS. Add the project number, S06-117, to the title block of each sheet. This number should be shown larger or bolder than any cross-reference numbers. Based on the evaluation of the proposed sewer design, this project qualifies for Standard sewer connection fee rates. SHEET 1. Revise General Note 25 to read ON-SITE SANITARY SEWERS WILL BE PUBLIC AND WILL BE DESIGNED AND CONSTRUCTED TO PIMA COUNTY WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT STANDARDS AND MUST BE ACCEPTED AND RELEASED FOR SERVICE BY PIMA COUNTY WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF SEWER CONNECTION PERMITS. Field verify the rim and invert elevations for existing public manhole 4811-07. Be aware that public sewer easements within common areas will not be required as these common areas will be dedicated to Pima County at the final plat stage. Revise easements as necessary. SHEET 11. A label for manhole 1 is shown on Street G, however no manhole is shown. Please revise as necessary. SHEET 14. Show all existing public sewer infrastructure within 100 feet of the project boundaries, including size, Pima County plan number and six-digit Pima County manhole numbers. We will require a revised set of drawings and a response letter addressing each comment. Additional comments may be made during the review of these documents. The next submittal of this project will be the 2nd submittal. A check for the review fee of this submittal in the amount of $100.00 made out to PIMA COUNTY TREASURER must accompany the revised set of bluelines and response letter. For any questions regarding the fee schedule, please go to http://www.pimaxpress.com/SubDivision/Documents/Fees.PDF where you may find the appropriate wastewater review fees at the bottom of page 1. If the number of sheets changes, please adjust the review fee accordingly. If you have any questions regarding the above mentioned comments, please contact me. Sincerely, Dickie Fernández, E.I.T. Telephone: (520) 740-6947 Copy: Project |
| 06/08/2006 | PETER MCLAUGHLIN | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Center Plans Coordination Office FROM: Peter McLaughlin Senior Planner FOR: David Rivera Principal Planner PROJECT: Wingate Lot 3 S06-117 Tentative Plat TRANSMITTAL: June 8, 2006 DUE DATE: June 13, 2006 1. An applicant has one (1) year from the date of application to obtain approval of a tentative plat that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application. This tentative plat must be approved on or before May14, 2007. LUC 4.1.7.1 2. Fill in the S06-117 number near the title block in the lower right hand corner of all sheets of the plat, landscape and NPPO plans. DS 2-03.2.2.B.1 3. This project fronts on Camino Seco, which is a designated Major Street and Route. Add a general note that states the project is designed to meet the overlay zone criteria of LUC Sec. 2.8.3, Major Streets and Routes (MS&R) Setback Zone. DS 2-03.2.2.B.7 4. LUC 3.6.1.4.A.5 requires that 25% of all units be provided with barrier-free accessibility. Please provide a general note so stating and list which units will be barrier-free. Also, provide a drawing detailing how accessibility will be accomplished. DS 2-10.3.1.D LUC 3.6.1.4.A.5 5. A copy of proposed CC&R's must be provided to the Zoning Review Section for review and approval prior to approval of the final plat. The CC&R's must meet the criteria of LUC 3.6.1.5 and DS 2-03.6.6. DS 2-10.3.2.E 6. LUC 3.6.1.4.A.9 requires that mechanical equipment be screened from adjacent exterior streets and from adjacent existing residential development. Screening shall be architecturally integrated with the overall design of the RCP. Add a general note stating how the mechanical equipment will meet this requirement. LUC 3.6.1.4.A.9 7. In addition to stating the maximum height allowed, provide a note stating proposed maximum height for the homes. Site perimeter setbacks may not be verified until building heights are specified. For setbacks purposes building heights are measured above design grade elevation rather than from finished floor elevation. Provide dimensioned elevation drawings indicating the proposed height of models in order to verify that setbacks are met. LUC 3.2.6.4 DS 2-10.3.1.A 8. Add a general note stating that the project is subject to LUC 3.5.7.1.E, LUC 3.5.7.1.F and 3.6.1. 9. Add all applicable reference numbers to the plat in the lower right hand corner near the title block. The applicable rezoning case number is C9-86-40. Add the rezoning conditions to the plat and demonstrate compliance with any applicable rezoning conditions. Add the Book and Page (Book 42/Page 66) of recordation for the original Wingate subdivision in the title block. DS 2-03.2.2.B.3 DS 2-03.2.1.G.3 DS 2-05.2.4.U 10. Add to the title block on all sheets a statement that this project is a Residential Cluster Project. DS 2-03.2.1.G.2 11. Because some of the lots are to be less than 4,000 square feet, provide building elevations of all proposed model units with height dimensions (see comment 7). These will assist in determining compliance with perimeter yard setbacks and screening of mechanical equipment. The elevations can be preliminary drawings. The model home construction plans will be used to determine exact setbacks and screening requirements at time of application for building permits. DS 2-10.3.2.D.2 12. The tentative plat lists Common areas "B" and "C" only in the title block. If there is also a common area "A" as indicated on the landscape plan, revise the tentative plat to show common area "A" and list it, along with its purpose, in the title block. DS 2-03.2.4.C 13. For microfilming and archiving purposes the minimum type size must be 12 point (0.12"). Revise the text in the location map along with any other lettering and dimensions that do not meet this minimum requirement. DS 2-03.2.1.C 14. Add an RCP data note to which details the requirements of LUC 3.6.1.4.H regarding completion of project amenities and site improvements. LUC 3.6.1.4.H 15. Show the location and dimension widths of any existing or proposed easements. The plat for Wingate (Book 43 Page 66) shows a drainage easement near the south property line. Show this easement on the plat or if it has been abandoned, add recordation information for the abandonment. Add the recordation information by docket and page numbers for all easements, or state that they will be "by final plat". DS 2-03.2.3.C DS 2-03.2.4.J 16. The street that is labeled "H" on the site index map on sheet 1 of 14 is labeled "I" on sheet 9 of 14. Revise. 17. The street labeled Linderbrook Drive on the maps is called out as Linderbrook Road in general note 13 and on typical road cross section 1 on sheet 3 of 14. Revise to be consistent. 18. The far side sight visibility triangle (SVT) at the intersection of Street K and Street I (H?) is drawn incorrectly on sheet 9 of 14. A 20-foot stem dimension is required. Revise. Provide SVT's at intersection of Street A and Street C on sheet 13 of 14. DS 3-01.5.2.A 19. Revise the front and side street building setback requirements in general note 10 to specify that the required setback is the greater of 21 feet or (H) measured from outside edge of nearest travel lane, with a minimum distance of 19 feet from back of sidewalk for garages. Revise typical lot detail 8 on sheet 3 of 14 to specify that the garage setback is a minimum of 18 feet from street property line, and 19 feet from back of sidewalk . Add information in the general notes and as a typical detail regarding rear perimeter yard building setbacks for lots along the outer perimeter of the site, such as lots 9 through 31. For these lots, with adjacent R-2 zoning, the rear perimeter yard setbacks are required to be the greater of 10 feet or ¾ of the height of exterior building wall. LUC 3.2.6.5 LUC 3.2.6.4 DS 2-10.3.1.B LUC 3.6.1.4.D.2 20. Clarify what is meant by keynote 1, which reads 10' public utility, signage, maintenance and landscape easement. Signage is not allowed in the front yards of residential lots and 10-foot street landscape borders are not required for lots along local streets in residential subdivisions. Also, clarify what is meant by keynote 4 on sheet 14 of 14, which reads "4-foot private use and benefit access easement". The Keynote 4 indicators point to a radius curve on the drawing. Revise or clarify. 21. All requested revisions must be made to tentative plat, landscape & NPPO plans. DS 2-07.2.1.A If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Peter McLaughlin, (520) 791-5608. |
| 06/09/2006 | FRODRIG2 | OTHER AGENCIES | PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS | Approved | Transportation Information for Rezoning, Subdivision and Development Review Requests File Number Description Date Reviewed E Pima Association of Governments Kristen Zimmerman, Data Services 177 N. Church Avenue, Suite 405 Tucson, AZ 85701 Phone: (520) 792-1093 Fax: (520) 620-6981 www.pagnet.org S06-117 Wingate Lot 3 6/8/2006 This analysis is designed to allow jurisdictional planning departments to further assess the traffic impacts of planned residential and commerical developments that PAG expects will generate more than 500 average daily trips. Nearby roadway data include planned improvements, existing and future volumes and capacities, and bus and bike accessibility. 1. Nearest Existing or Planned Major Street 2. Is a street improvement planned as part of PAG's 5-Year Transportation Improvement Program? See http://www.pagnet.org/tip/ for more information on the TIP planning process. Planned Action: STREET IDENTIFICATION 3. Existing (2005) Daily Traffic Volume (reported in ADT) See http://www.pagnet.org/TPD/DataTrends/ for more information. 4. Existing (2005) Daily Capacity (reported in ADT) 5. Existing (2005) Number of Lanes 8. Future (2030) Number of Lanes TRANSIT AND BIKEWAYS CONSIDERATIONS 10. Present Bus Service (Route, Frequency, Distance) 11. Existing or Planned Bikeway Remarks: Street Number 1 Street Number 2, if applicable. Year Year Planned Action: VOLUME/CAPACITY/TRAFFIC GENERATION CONSIDERATIONS 6. Future (2030) Daily Volume (reported in ADT) (Assuming planned transportation improvement projects are completed.) 7. Future (2030) Daily Capacity (reported in ADT) Camino Seco (Irvington to Escalante) No 0 2,255 22,160 2 22,160 7,390 2 3,225 Rte 3, 30 min, 0.5 miles None 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9. Average daily traffic (ADT) forecasted as a result of the proposed development |
| 06/09/2006 | KAY MARKS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Denied | 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 KAY MARKS ADDRESSING OFFICIAL PH: 740-6480 FAX #: 740-6370 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL SUBJECT: S06-117 WINGATE LOT 3/TENTATIVE PLAT DATE: 6/08/06 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and the following matters must be resolved prior to our approval: Include all resubdivision information on all Title Blocks. Spell out all street suffixes except on Location Map. Most of the adjacent subdivision information on the Site Index & pg. 7 are incorrect. Please correct. Label approved interior street names on Final Plat. The Matchlines for pgs. 10 & 11 do not match the actual pages. Please correct. Label Lot 19 on pg. 13. Label Wingate Boulevard on pg. 14. es |
| 06/14/2006 | DALE KELCH | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Denied | Please submit Type III traffic impact study for further review. Study horizon should include the opening year of the development, five years after opening and ten years after opening. The minimum study area should include the site access drives all signalized intersections, and/or major unsignalized street intersections within one mile of the development. |
| 06/19/2006 | PAUL MACHADO | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | To: Patricia Gehlen DATE: June 20, 2006 CDRC/Zoning Manager SUBJECT: Wingate, Lot 3 Tentative Plat S06-117 (First Review) T15S, R14E, Section 34 RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Subdivision Plat and Drainage Report. The Subdivision Plat (SP) and Drainage Report (DR) cannot be approved as submitted. Please address the following review comments prior to the next submittal. Tentative Plat: 1. Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the TP. 2. As per the Federal ADA requirements, all wheel chair ramps shall have the truncated domes instead of the standard grooves that are shown on COT SD 207. Aside from the Truncated Domes, all wheel chair ramps shall be constructed in accordance with COT SD 207. 3. This parcel is subject to the Xeroreparian Low Habitat overlay zone. Applicants proposing a project with encroachment into the xeroreparian habitat zone and the one hundred (100) year floodplain are required to submit a mitigation plan in accordance with Sec. 2.8.6.5.D of the LUC and an Environmental Resource Report as defined in Sec. 6.2.5 of the LUC. and compliance with regulations in accordance with the DSD - Procedure. Contact Patricia Gehlen x1179 or via e-mail at Patricia.Gahlen@tucsonaz.gov for assistance with the review process. 4. Include the re-zoning conditions (C9-86-40 and C9-87-19) on the TP. Further comments may be forth coming depending on the re-zoning conditions. 5. Any work planned in the 100-year floodplain will require a flood plain use permit. Add a general note to this effect on the TP. 6. Include the geotechnical report with the next submittal. 7. All patio and retaining wall footings shall be shown to be constructed within the property lines. 8. Provide complete information for the intersection improvements at Wingate Blvd. and Linderbrook Drive. Show the proposed improvements to Wingate Blvd. North of Linderbrook Drive. Contact TDOT 791-5100 for possible improvements to Wingate Blvd. South of Linderbrook Drive. Provide documents of TDOT decision on the improvement plans. 9. Provide cross-sections of existing Wingate Blvd. and Irvington Rd. 10. The request for detention/retention cannot be waived for areas 2 and 3 at this time due to the fact that there are no clear paths directly draining into the major water course ie: The Pantano Wash. 11. Label existing and future sight visibility triangles per D.S. 2-02.2.1.10. 12. Explain why the common areas begin with common "B" instead of common area "A". Re-label all common areas that may be used in a dual and/or single use capacity per D.S. 2-03.6.4.C. For example, a Ret./Det. Basin may also be used as a recreation facility or only as a drainage facility or drainage channel, this must be reflected on the Final Plat. A key note explaining the labels could be used in conjunction with the labels, i.e.: Common Area "A" - Streets Common Area "B" - Drainage/Recreation Facilities Common Area "C" - Recreation Facilities Common Area "D" - Drainage Facilities Common Area "E" - Landscaping 13. Label all slopes, for example 2:1, 3:1, 4:1 etc. 14. Provide details of all drainage facilities including but not limited to depths, slopes and treatment, inverts and WSEL's. 15. Ret./Det. basins 2' or greater in depth with side slopes greater than 4:1 require handrails. 16. Please provide Drainage patterns and finished grades per D.S. 2-02.2.1.16. 17. Please list estimated cut & fill quantities per D.S. 2-02.2.1.17. 18. Please show dimensioned right-of-way, including any applicable Major Streets and Routes (MS&R) Plan right-of-way per D.S. 2-02.2.1.19. 19. All easement of record must be graphically shown on the plan together with recording docket and page per D.S. 2-02.2.1.20. 20. Add the basin(s) maintenance responsibility note per S.M.D.D.F.M. 2.3.1.6 C 1 and 2 to the TP. 21. Show Subdivision plan number (S06-117) on all sheets per D.S. 2-02.2.1.29. 22. A permit or a private improvement agreement will be necessary for any work performed within the Right-of-way. Contact Permits and Codes at (520) 791-5100 for permit information. 23. Please show the proposed roof drainage patterns, 100% of the 10-year flow must be conveyed under the sidewalks including any other site drainage as well. Please provide supporting calculations to demonstrate compliance with D.S. 3-01.4.4. If the location(s) of the roof scuppers have not yet been decided, a general note indicating sidewalk scuppers will be used when the roof scuppers locations have been designed and located will suffice. 24. Add note: "Depress all landscaped areas 6" maximum for water harvesting". 25. "A grading permit and Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) will be required for this project. Submit 4 sets of grading and SWPPP with text, upon completion and submittal of a grading permit application. A grading permit may not be issued prior to subdivision plat approval. Subsequent comments may be necessary, depending upon the nature and extent of revisions that occur to the plans". Drainage Report: 1. Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the DR. 2. This review was performed for Tentative Plat purposes only. Final review and acceptance will at the grading plan stage. 3. Explain why the drainage channels are curved and lead in a round about way before the channel joins the splash pad. 4. Provide details of all drainage facilities including but not limited to depths, slopes and treatment, inverts and WSEL's. 5. This site is partially in a balanced basin and is greater than 1 acre, therefore this parcel is subject detention/retention requirements. 6. Percolation results must be submitted prior to the final release of the grading permit. 7. Any and all work planned in the 100-year floodplain will require a flood plain use permit. 8. The request for detention/retention cannot be waived for areas 2 and 3 at this time due to the fact that there are no clear paths directly draining into the major water course ie: The Pantano Wash. 9. Add a statement in the drainage report that you have reviewed the previous drainage reports that the data was taken from and used in this drainage report indicating that you agree with that data. 10. It appears that a majority of the proposed earthen drainage channels have high velocities without any scour protection, also any drainage structure with rip-rap shall use filter fabric. Revise as required. 11. Provide supporting calculations sidewalk and drainage scuppers to demonstrate compliance with D.S. 3-01.4.4 12. This parcel is subject to the Xeroreparian Low Habitat overlay zone. Applicants proposing a project with encroachment into the one hundred (100) year floodplain are required to submit a mitigation plan in accordance with Sec. 2.8.6.5.D of the LUC and compliance with regulations in accordance with the DSD - Procedure. Contact Patricia Gehlen x1179 or via e-mail at Patricia.Gahlen@tucsonaz.gov for assistance with the review process. 13. Show the project address or administration address on the cover sheet of the DR. 14. If applicable, add the basin(s) maintenance responsibility note and checklist per S.M.D.D.F.M. 2.3.1.6 C 1 and 2 to the DR. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-5550 x1193 or Paul.Machado@ci.tucsonaz.govs Paul P. Machado Senior Engineering Associate City of Tucson/Development Services Department 201 N. Stone Avenue P.O. Box 27210 Tucson, Arizona 85726-7210 (520) 791-5550 x1193 office (520) 879-8010 fax C:/Camino Seco and Irvington Rd CDRC |
| 06/20/2006 | FRODRIG2 | COT NON-DSD | REAL ESTATE | Denied | S06-117 Wingate Lot 3: Tentative Plat Review - It appears the State of Arizona still holds Lot 3. The title report, effective date 4/17/2006, that was provided is irrelevant until title transfers to the proposed owner. |
| 06/24/2006 | PGEHLEN1 | TUCSON WATER NEW AREA DEVELOPMENT | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 06/27/2006 | ED ABRIGO | PIMA COUNTY | ASSESSOR | Approved | Office of the Pima County Assessor 115 N. Church Ave. Tucson, Arizona 85701 BILL STAPLES ASSESSOR TO: CDRC Office Subdivision Review City of Tucson (FAX# 791-5559) FROM: Gary Ault, Mapping Supervisor Pima County Assessor’s Office Mapping Department DATE: June 15, 2006 RE: Assessor’s Review and Comments Regarding Tentative Plat S06-117 Wingate Lot 3 T141534 (136-30) * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * X Plat meets Assessor’s Office requirements. _______ Plat does not meet Assessor’s Office requirements. COMMENTS: Thank you for your submittal. Please make the following additions/corrections in the final plat. Add the interior bearings and dimensions for the lots, the bearings and dimensions for the street centerlines and the complete curve data. Add section tie. Add road information for Camino De Seco and Linderbrook Drive. Add the map and plat that this subdivision is coming out of to the title block; ex. Wingate 43/66 M&P. Since the name of this subdivision is Wingate Lot 3, there is no need to have lot 3 in the second line, just lots 1-337 will do. If there are any questions, please contact Susan King at 740-4391. NOTE: THE ASSESSOR’S CURRENT INVOLVEMENT IN PROCESSING ITS MANUAL MAPS TO DIGITAL FORMAT IS EXPEDITED GREATLY BY EXCHANGE OF DIGITAL DATA. IN THE COURSE OF RECORDING THIS SUBDIVISION YOUR ASSISTANCE IN PROVIDING THIS OFFICE WITH AN AUTOCAD COPY WOULD BE GREATLY APPRECIATED. THANK YOU FOR ANY DIGITAL DATA PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED. Susan King |
| 06/27/2006 | GLENN HICKS | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Denied | DATE: June 26, 2006 TO: Ferne Rodriguez, Development Services FROM: Glenn Hicks Parks and Recreation 791-4873 ext. 215 Glenn.Hicks@tucsonaz.gov CC: SUBJECT: S06-117 Wingate Lot 3: Tentative Plat Review(6/13/06) Rezoning conditions must be shown on plat before staff can evaluate plans. |
| 07/12/2006 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES July 12, 2006 Ryan Stucki Stantec 201 North Bonita, Suite 100 Tucson, AZ 85706 Subject: S06-117 Wingate Lot 3 Tentative Plat Dear Ryan: Your submittal of May 15, 2006 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a DETAILED cover letter explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLUELINES MUST BE FOLDED 10 Copies Revised Tentative Plat ( Addressing, Wastewater, Traffic, Real Estate, Parks and Recreation, Landscape, Engineering, Community Planning, Zoning, DSD) 6 Copies Revised Landscape Plan (Landscape, Community Planning, Zoning, Engineering, Parks and Recreation, DSD) 2 Copies Revised NPPO (Landscape, DSD) 2 Copies Revised Drainage Report (Engineering, DSD) 2 Copies Color Elevations and Photos (Community Planning, DSD) Should you have any questions, please call me at 791-5608 ext. 1179. Sincerely, Patricia Y. Gehlen CDRC Manager All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: ???? |