Plan Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL- RECORD OF SURVEY
Plan Number - S06-113
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL- RECORD OF SURVEY
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10/20/2006 | MARILYN KALTHOFF | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 10/23/2006 | JIM EGAN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Denied | Indicate on the plans the rear 3 units need automatic fire sprinklers because there is no turn around or complying fire access road. |
| 11/13/2006 | PATRICIA GILBERT | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | TO: Patricia Gehlen; CDRC Coordinator DATE: November 13, 2006 SUBJECT: Engineering review of the, Record of Survey. The activity number is S06-113. SUMMARY: The Record of Survey was received by Engineering on October 20th, 2006. Engineering has reviewed the received items and does not recommend approval of the Record of Survey. RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: RECORD OF SURVEY RECORD OF SURVEY COMMENTS 1. If the property to the north with four structures is not part of the survey, do not include this lot on the plan view. If this lot is not part of the subdivision, remove, otherwise the lot should have a designated number and included in the title block. Revise appropriately. DS 2-03.11.12.D. 2. The words "Book ____ Page ____" should be placed on the bottom of the lower right hand corner of the page. The upper placement is in the correct location. Revise appropriately. DS 2-03.11.7.E. 3. Is the new driveway to the south shared? It is not clear how lot 2 will be accessed. Clarify in the response letter. 4. Lighten the line weight for the utility lines. It is difficult to determine the entire length of the 1' No Access Easement. A distance and bearing is also interfering with the visibility of part of the 1' No Access Easement. The required information must be visible on the plan view. Revise the survey to clearly show the 1' No Access Easement. 5. In addition to the above comment, the first submittal showed the 1' No Access Easement traveling along east property line for lot 1, this is not shown on the second submittal. Is this a typo? Is the 1' No Access Easement suppose to travel along the east property line of lot 1? Please clarify and/or revise the Record of Survey. 6. The centerline of Balboa Street is not visible. Identify and label the street centerline of Balboa Avenue and use the appropriate symbol for the centerline. DS 2-03.11.10.B. 7. It appears there is a dimension for the existing ROW line and curb location. However the dimensions are not labeled and street centerline is not visible. The dimensions for the existing ROW line and curb location must be identifiable. Revise appropriately. DS 2-03.11.11.B. 8. Only indicate the existing shed to be demolished on the site plan. The record of survey document only should have the required existing information found in DS 2-03.11.11. Remove the shed and any other site plan information that should only be on the site plan. 9. All proposed easements (utility, sewer, drainage, access, etc.) are to be dimensioned and labeled as to their purposes and whether they will be public or private. Indicate if the ingress/egress/utility easement is public or private. DS 2-03.11.12.A. The above comment is from the first review and has not been addressed. The 20' ingress/egress/utility easement has not been designated as public or private. Indicate whether the 20' ingress/egress/utility easement is public or private. 10. Indicate primary control points, or descriptions and ties to such control points, to which all dimensions, angles, bearings, and similar data on the Record of Survey will be referred. At least one (1) corner of the property will be tied by course and distance to a section corner or a quarter section corner. The plan must include a description of that corner marker and an indication of how the bearings were determined. Corner tie recordation information is to be provided on the plan. This is the second request. DS 2-03.11.10.A. 11. Indicate the location of the curb cut/driveway for the property to the south adjacent to the project. A minimum of 12' must be between each curb cut. Revise appropriately. This is the second request. DS 2-03.11.12.E. |
| 11/15/2006 | KAY MARKS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Denied | 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 KAY MARKS ADDRESSING OFFICIAL PH: 740-6480 FAX #: 740-6370 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL SUBJECT: S06-113 BALBOA-REVISED RECORD OF SURVEY DATE: 11/14/06 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and the following matters must be resolved prior to our approval: Delete all street directions on Location Map. A lot of the subdivision information and locations are incorrect on the Location Map. Please correct. Delete the “CL” in front of streets or label in a way that it doesn’t look like part of the street. Delete addresses on all Title Blocks. Include Lots 1-3 on all Title Blocks. Add “a portion of” Lot 7 on all Title Blocks. Label Lot 7. es |
| 11/16/2006 | HEATHER THRALL | ZONING | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Heather Thrall Senior Planner PROJECT: S06-113, Balboa Balboa/Jacinto area Record of Survey TRANSMITTAL DATE: November 15, 2006 DUE DATE: November 20, 2006 COMMENTS: CONDITIONAL APPROVAL 1. (Per last review) Per DS 2-03.11.11.A., provide legal descriptions and recordation info for easements. RESPONSE: Indicated a 1' NVA easement provided on plan. I see the easement added, thank you. What I need is for all easements- including the 20' IEU easement - be recorded first, then their docket and page placed on the record of survey. A copy of the legal description for the easements should be provided to me as well, please. 2. Provide legal descriptions for all three lots of this project. 3. Depending upon responses provided, further review comments may be forthcoming. Should you have any questions on this review, please contact me at Heather.Thrall@tucsonaz.gov or at 791-4541x1156. C:\planning\cdrc\record of survey/\S06-113 balboa.doc RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised record of survey and additional requested documents. |
| 11/22/2006 | MARILYN KALTHOFF | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Denied | November 22, 2006 TO: Geoffrey Brimhall, R.L.S. Physical Resource Engineering, Inc. THRU: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Manager City of Tucson, Development Services Department FROM: Chandubhai C. Patel, P.E. Pima County Development Services Department Development Review Division (Wastewater) SUBJECT: Marzo Construction Record of Survey - 2nd Submittal S06-113 The proposed sewer collection lines to serve the above-referenced project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use. 1. Clearly label the proposed private sewers, including their length, size and slope. This is a repeat comment. 2. Show the rim and invert elevations of the existing manhole where the proposed sewer will be connecting to. 3. If the three units are going to share a private sewer, this project will require a Joint Use And Maintenance Agreement. Please contact Ilene Deckard (Pima County Wastewater Management Department) at (520) 740-6544 to coordinate this matter. This is a repeat comment. 4. Provide cleanouts at intermediate points preferably where the two sewers are connecting. Provide the rim and invert elevations of the cleanouts. 5. Provide a cleanout where the proposed sewer is making a 90 degree turn, and provide its rim and invert elevations. 6. We will require a revised set of drawings and a response letter addressing each comment. Additional comments may be made during the review of these documents. The next submittal of this project will be the 3rd submittal. A check for the review fee of this submittal in the amount of $39.00 made out to PIMA COUNTY TREASURER must accompany the revised set of bluelines and response letter. For any questions regarding the fee schedule, please go to http://www.pimaxpress.com/SubDivision/Documents/Fees.PDF where you may find the appropriate wastewater review fees at the bottom of page 1. If the number of sheets changes, please adjust the review fee accordingly. If you have any question regarding the above comments, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, Chandubhai C. Patel, P.E. Telephone: (520) 740-6563 Copy: Project File |
| 11/24/2006 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES November 24, 2006 Enrique Durazo III Marzo Construction 98 North Silverbell Tucson, Arizona 85745 Subject: S06-113 Balboa Record of Survey Dear Enrique: Your submittal of October 20, 2006 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a DETAILED cover letter for each agency explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: 7 Copies Revised Record of Survey (Fire, Engineering, Wastewater, Real Estate, Addressing, Zoning, DSD), 2 Copies Legal Descriptions (Zoning, DSD) Should you have any questions, please call me at 791-5608, ext 1179. Sincerely, Patricia Gehlen CDRC Manager All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: 207-0124 |
| 11/24/2006 | FRODRIG2 | COT NON-DSD | REAL ESTATE | Denied | S06-113 Balboa - Record of Survey: Resubmittal - Record of Survey - Request status of the City's lien in reference to "Notice of Contingent Tax Liability Payment to the City of Tucson Tax Ordinance" Dkt./Pg. 12866/626. It also appears property taxes are past due. |
| 11/24/2006 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-RECORDATION | REVIEW | Needs Review |