Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Plan Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: MINOR SUBDIVISION REVIEW
Plan Number - S06-101
Review Name: MINOR SUBDIVISION REVIEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 04/28/2006 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 05/05/2006 | TOM MARTINEZ | OTHER AGENCIES | AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION | Approved | NO COMMENT S06-101 TETRA TECH, INC GLENN STREET ESTATES -------------------------------------------------------- Confidentiality and Nondisclosure Notice: This email transmission and any attachments are intended for use by the person(s)/entity(ies) named above and may contain confidential/privileged information. Any unauthorized use, disclosure or distribution is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by e-mail, and delete or destroy all copies plus attachments. |
| 05/10/2006 | ROGER HOWLETT | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Approved | DEPARTMENT OF URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT S06-101 Glenn Street Estates 05/09/06 () Tentative Plat (XXXX) Development Plan () Landscape Plan () Revised Plan/Plat () Board of Adjustment () Other CROSS REFERENCE: NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: Grant-Alvernon GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: COMMENTS DUE BY: 05/26/06 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: (XXXX) No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment () Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions () RCP Proposal Complies With Plan Policies () See Additional Comments Attached () No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: () Resubmittal Required: () Tentative Plat () Development Plan () Landscape Plan () Other REVIEWER: D. Estolano 791-4505 DATE: 05/08/06 |
| 05/12/2006 | JIM EGAN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Denied | Add the following note to plans: "No Parking - Fire Lane" signs shall be provided as needed to provide 20' clear unobstructed width along all fire apparatus access roadways in accordance with the fire code |
| 05/15/2006 | PETER MCLAUGHLIN | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1) Submit documentation with native plant preservation exception application. See instructions on the reverse side of the application. DS 2-15.2.0 |
| 05/22/2006 | GLENN HICKS | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Approved | DATE: May 18, 2006 TO: Ferne Rodriguez, Development Services FROM: Glenn Hicks Parks and Recreation 791-4873 ext. 215 Glenn.Hicks@tucsonaz.gov SUBJECT: S06-101 Glenn Street Estates: Minor Subdivision Review(5-1-06) Staff has no comments. |
| 05/23/2006 | LIZA CASTILLO | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Approved | SUBJECT: GLENN STREET ESTATES Lots 1-5 S06-101 Tucson Electric Power Company (TEP) has no objection to the preliminary plat submitted for review May 1, 2006. Enclosed is a copy of TEP's facility map showing the approximate location and unit numbers of the existing facilities. Also enclosed is a copy of the tentative plat showing where TEP will be placing the aboveground equipment for this subdivision? This is not a preliminary design. TEP has provided this drawing to show where the proposed locations are for transformers and pedestals. TEP will provide a preliminary electrical design on the Approved Tentative Plat within fifteen (15) working days upon receipt of the plat. Additional plans necessary for preparation of the design are: building plans including water, electrical, landscape, sidewalk and paving plans. Also, submit the AutoCAD version of the plat on a CD or email to DTellez@tep.com. Should you have any questions, please contact me at (520) 918-8297. Sincerely, Denise Tellez Scheduling Coordinator Design/Build dt Enclosures cc: P. Gehlen/F. Rodriguez, City of Tucson (by e-mail) RV Sunset II, LLC Denise Tellez 918-8297 DB102 |
| 05/24/2006 | FRODRIG2 | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Denied | May 24, 2006 To: Tim McCann, Tetra Tech Thru: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Project Manager City of Tucson Development Services Department ____________________________________ From: Michael Harrington (520-740-6579), representing the Pima County Departments of Wastewater Management and Environmental Quality Subject: Glenn Street Estates Lots 1-5 with Access and Utility Easement Final Plat - 1st Submittal S06-101 The proposed final plat for the above-referenced project has been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use. This project will be tributary to the Roger Road Wastewater Treatment Facility via the South Rillito - West (South Line) Interceptor. Obtain a letter from the PCWMD's Development Services Section, written within the past 90 days, stating that treatment and conveyance system capacity for the project is available in the downstream public sewerage system and provide a copy of that letter to this office. The required form to request such a letter may be found at: http://www.pima.gov/wwm/forms/docs/CapResponseRequest.pdf. The final plat for this project cannot be approved until this office has received a copy of this letter. This project was transmitted as a final plat but has no dedication block that designates a responsible party to control operate and maintain the private sewer system. It also has a utility and grading plan. This is clearly not a final plat and I have reviewed it as if it were a tentative plat / development plan. All Sheets: Add the subdivision case number, S06-101, to the title block of each sheet. This number should be shown larger or bolder than any cross-reference numbers. No wastewater review fees will be charged for sheets where this is the only required revision. Sheet 1: Delete General Note #8. Sheet 1: Revise General Note # 9. so that it states: THE ON-SITE SANITARY SEWERS WILL BE PRIVATE AND WILL BE CONSTRUCTED, OPERATED AND MAINTAINED ON A PRIVATE BASIS, AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH AN APPROVED OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE PLAN, IF REQUIRED. THE LOCATION AND METHOD OF CONNECTION TO AN EXISTING PUBLIC SANITARY SEWER IS SUBJECT TO REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE PIMA COUNTY WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT. Sheet 1: Add a General Note that states: ALL SEWERS ARE DESIGNED TO PROVIDE GRAVITY FLOW. Sheet 1: Add a General Note that states: A PROPERTY OWNERS’ ASSOCIATION WILL BE FORMED TO ACCEPT RESPONSIBILITY AND LIABILITY FOR CONSTRUCTION, MAINTENANCE, OPERATION AND CONTROL OF ALL PRIVATE SEWERS. Sheet 1: Show the proposed sewer lines (private) and existing sanitary sewer line (public) using different line-types, so that they can readily be distinguished from each other. Also, show and describe examples of these different linetypes in the legend on Sheet 1. Sheet 2: Provide the Rim and Invert elevations for the proposed new manhole that will be constructed over the existing public sewer. Also provide the invert for the proposed 6” private sewer that will be the point of connection to the public sewer. Sheet 2: Keynotes #14. You are proposing to construct a new public manhole over the existing 18” sewer using PC/COT standard detail WWM 211. The minimum riser height for the 211 manhole is 7’ plus a 2’ transition ring and another minimum 1’riser plus the 14” frame and cover. The 211 manhole will not work in an 8’ hole. Also, any connection of a less than 12” diameter sewer to a 18” or greater diameter sewers requires special consideration due to the potential for off-gassing, corrosion potential and related operation and maintenance issues related to odor complaints. Revise Keynotes #14 so that it states: CONSTRUCT FLAT TOP MANHOLE – TYPE “A” PER PC/COT STANDARD DETAILS WWM 209 AND 303, WITH BACKWATER VALVE AND CORROSION CONTROL PER PC/COT STANDARD DETAILS WWM A-3.5 AND A-3.8. Sheet 2: Revise the site plan so that it shows: The public sewer construction plan number for the existing public 18” VCP pipe that you are proposing to connect too. Add the pipe material (VCP) and arrows that show the direction of flow in the existing 18” sewer. Sheet 2: Revise the site plan so that it shows: The Rim and Invert elevations for the keynotes #16 labeled sewer main cleanouts. Sheet 2: Revise the site plan so that it shows: The length and slope of the keynotes #15 labeled sewer line pipes. This project proposes to build a private gravity sewerage collection systems. Pursuant to PCWMD Director, Michael Gritzuk’s letter to PCDSD Director, Carmine DeBonis, dated March 13, 2006, i.e. Private Sewers and Pump Stations, the final plat for this project will not be approved without written authorization from the PCWMD Director’s office. A copy of Mr. Gritzuk’s letter is being provided for your inspection via separate email. I have been instructed to bring this file to the attention of the PCDSD Development Review Engineer, Subhash Raval, for submission to Mr. Mike Bunch, Deputy Director of PCWMD. This office will require a revised set of bluelines, and a response letter, addressing these comments. Additional comments may be made during the review of these documents. Pima County Code Title 13.20.030.A.2 requires that a wastewater review fee be paid for each submittal of the final plat. The fee for the first submittal is $166 plus $50 per sheet. For the second submittal, the review fee is $50 per sheet. For all subsequent submittals, the review fee is $39 per sheet. The next submittal of this project will be the second (2nd) submittal. A check for the review fee of this submittal in the amount of $100.00 (made out to PIMA COUNTY TREASURER) must accompany the revised set of bluelines and response letter. If the number of sheets changes, please adjust the review fee accordingly. If you have any questions regarding the above mentioned comments, please contact me at the telephone number shown under my signature on the first page of this letter CC: Project File |
| 05/24/2006 | FRODRIG2 | OTHER AGENCIES | PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS | Approved | Estimated daily traffic in 24 hr period - 48 |
| 05/26/2006 | DALE KELCH | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Denied | Traffic Engineering REJECTS this TP: 1. List the name, ROW width, recordation data, type and dimensioned with of paving, curbs, curb cuts and sidewalks. (DS 2-03.2.3.D). There is no ROW information provided for Glenn nor is there any recordation data. Be sure to show both existing and future ROW as Glenn is on the current MSRP. If existing and future ROW are coincident, label it as both existing and future. 2. Label radius returns at the new street. 25' minimum required. 3. Show and label as to size (ie 20x110) both existing and future SVTs (DS 2-03.2.4.M). If the existing and future SVTs are coincident, label it as both existing and future. SVTs are shown but not labeled as to being existing or future or both. 4. The hammerhead turnaround is required to have 114' clear space between parking areas. This plan does not seem to provide this. there is no dimension given but it scales to approximately 111'.(DS3-01.0 fig 23) D. Dale Kelch, PE Senior Engineering Associate Traffic Engineering Division (520)791-4259x305 (520)791-5526 (fax) dale.kelch@tucsonaz.gov |
| 05/26/2006 | ED ABRIGO | PIMA COUNTY | ASSESSOR | Denied | Office of the Pima County Assessor 115 N. Church Ave. Tucson, Arizona 85701 BILL STAPLES ASSESSOR TO: CDRC Office Subdivision Review City of Tucson (FAX# 791-5559) FROM: Gary Ault, Mapping Supervisor Pima County Assessor’s Office Mapping Department DATE: May 25, 2006 RE: Assessor’s Review and Comments Regarding Final Plat S06-101 Glenn Street Estates T131433 (111-08) * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Plat meets Assessor’s Office requirements. ____X__ Plat does not meet Assessor’s Office requirements. COMMENTS: Thank you for your submittal. Please make the following additions/corrections. Lot lines must be solid lines. Add bearings and dimensions for lot lines. The private street should be listed as a common area in the title block, since it is not an easement. Provide road information for Glenn Street. Add names of adjacent subdivision(s). Add a section tie, or a tie to the parent subdivision. Remove hatching. If there are any questions, please contact Susan King at 740-4391. NOTE: THE ASSESSOR’S CURRENT INVOLVEMENT IN PROCESSING ITS MANUAL MAPS TO DIGITAL FORMAT IS EXPEDITED GREATLY BY EXCHANGE OF DIGITAL DATA. IN THE COURSE OF RECORDING THIS SUBDIVISION YOUR ASSISTANCE IN PROVIDING THIS OFFICE WITH AN AUTOCAD COPY WOULD BE GREATLY APPRECIATED. THANK YOU FOR ANY DIGITAL DATA PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED. Susan King |
| 05/26/2006 | KAY MARKS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Denied | 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 KAY MARKS ADDRESSING OFFICIAL PH: 740-6480 FAX #: 740-6370 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL SUBJECT: S06-101 GLENN STREET ESTATES/MINOR SUBDIVISION REVIEW DATE: May 26, 2006 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and the following matters must be resolved prior to our approval: Change Blacklidge St. to Drive on Location Map. Change R-13-E to R14-E on all Title Blocks. Spell out Boulevard of Dodge Blvd. on pg. 2 & 3. Recorded deeds with legal descriptions will need to be provided in order to address parcels. jg |
| 06/01/2006 | JCLARK3 | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Approved | * No known landfill with in 1000 feet of this development. * Five individual residential lots can be serviced with Automated Plastic Containers at the curbside off the PAAL. Note: The service location for the SW corner lot will be in front of the center south lot. It is requested that the floor plan of the center lot be reversed so the garage access will be on the east side of the lot. |
| 06/05/2006 | PATRICIA GILBERT | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | TO: Patricia Gehlen; CDRC Coordinator DATE: June 2, 2006 SUBJECT: Engineering review of the Glenn Street Estates Tentative Plat. The activity number is S06-101. SUMMARY: The Tentative Plat and Drainage Statement were received by Engineering on May 1st, 2006. Engineering has reviewed the received items and does not recommend approval of the Tentative Plat or the Drainage Statement. RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: TENTATIVE PLAT, DRAINAGE STATEMENT GENERAL COMMENTS 1. The Drainage Statement was reviewed for Tentative Plat purposes only. 2. Please include the Assurance Package with the Final Plat submittal. This package must include the original Third Party Trust, the original Amendment to Trust, a copy of the Trust Agreement, a copy of the Deed, and a Title Report. 3. Include a copy of the CC&Rs with the Final Plat submittal. The specific maintenance notes specified in the Standards Manual for Drainage Design and Floodplain Management, SMDDFM, 14.3.2 must be included on the Final Plat or in the CC&Rs. The term "owner" in the maintenance notes is to be replaced with "Homeowners Association". 4. Please provide a copy of the boundary closure calculations with the Final Plat submittal. 5. A Grading Plan and Permit will be required. Proposed grading in excess of 5,000 yards is designated "engineered grading" and a soils engineering report is required with the Grading Plan submittal. Development Standard 11-01.4.1.C. The Soils Report must also address the requirements detailed in the Standards Manual for Drainage Design and Floodplain Management, SMDDFM, 14.2.6. 6. Proposed fills in excess of two feet above existing grade at any location in the outer one hundred feet of the developing site adjacent to residentially zoned property require the procedure outlined in Development Standard 11-01.8.1. This process must be complete prior to Grading Plan approval. 7. All proposed easements must be shown in a surveyable manner on the Final Plat. The next submittal must address the following items: TENTATIVE PLAT 1. The submittal provided a tentative plat (4 sheets). The title block of the plat should read Tentative Plat for Glenn Street Estates, the number of lots 1-5 and any proposed common area. Change the title on the first sheet to read, "Tentative Plat for Glenn Street Estates" and revise the title block to read, "Tentative Plat for Glenn Street Estates, lots 1-5." If common area is proposed include the common area within the title block. DS 2-03.2.1.G. 2. Lighten or remove any unnecessary lines; contours and lines with circles (chain link fence) from the small index drawing on sheet one. This information is provided on the following sheets and is not necessary to have on the first sheet. Revise. DS 2-03.2.1.E. 3. Provide the property line weight in the legend. DS 2-03.2.1.J. 4. Place the subdivision case number in the lower hand corner of each sheet. DS 2-03.2.2.B.1. 5. General note number 13 indicates 0.039 miles of a private street. Per the LUC 4.2.2.1.C. applicability for developing a minor subdivision, new streets can not be proposed for a Minor Subdivision. The plat view does not indicate or label a street. It appears a PAAL is proposed. Clarify in detail in the response letter and revise the plat appropriately. DS 2-03.2.2.D.1.b. 6. If a street is not proposed revise general note number 13 as follows; "Total miles of new public streets are ________." "Total miles of new private streets are _______." 7. Provide the following general note on the plat, "Lots with frontage on a street designated a Major Street or Route shall have ingress-egress designed in a manner so that motor vehicles do not back out onto the Major Street or Route, through the use of circular drives, turnarounds, or other similar solutions." D.S. 2-03. 2.2.D.2. 8. Provide bearings on all lot lines on all applicable sheets. DS 2-03.2.3.B. 9. All existing easements will be drawn on the plat, and recordation information, locations, widths, and purposes shall be included. If the easement is not in use and proposed for abandonment, so indicate. Blanket easements should be listed in the notes, together with recordation data and their proposed status. Revise the plat appropriately. D.S. 2-03. 2.2.3.C. 10. Provide the following information regarding the existing public right-of-way: from centerline the right-of-way width, dimensioned width of paving, curbs, and sidewalks. Include the recordation data for Glenn Street. D.S. 2-03. 2.2.3.D. 11. The new lot lines must be clearly defined on the plat. It is not clear if each lot includes part of the PAAL or if the PAAL is common area. Proposed lot lines should be a solid dark line. Provide distances and bearings for each lot. Revise the plat to provide the requested information, a solid line that differentiates between other line weights and distances and bearings for each lot. Also clarify if the PAAL is included in the lots or if the PAAL is separate common area. Revise appropriately. DS 2-03.2.4.A. 12. If this project has common area, for example the proposed PAAL, label each common area individually with a separate letter designation. Enclose the common area with a solid line. Revise the plat appropriately. DS 2-03.2.4.C. 13. On sheet 2 lighten the line weight of the utility lines in effort to determine the lot lines and other required information. See above comments 11 and 12. 14. Street dedications in accordance with the Major Streets and Routes (MS&R) Plan will be shown. Projects bounded by streets having only a portion of the right-of-way width dedicated will be required to dedicate right-of-way, up to one-half (½), to complete the street width. Glenn Street is a collector street per the MS&R ROW Plan with a full ROW width of 64'. Provide on the plat, dimensions from centerline the future MS&R half ROW width, future curb and sidewalk location. Label all dimensions appropriately. DS 2-03.2.4.H. 15. Provide future site visibility triangles. Dimension and label accordingly. If the existing and future SVTs are coincident, label it as both existing and future. DS 2-03.2.4.R. 16. A clear line of sight from 30" to 6' must be maintained for an ingress/egress to a collector. The plat shows covered patios within the SVT. The proposed covered patios are not approvable within the SVT. Revise the plat to show the covered patios outside both the future and existing SVT. DS 3-01.5.0. 17. All proposed easements (utility, sewer, drainage, access, etc.) are to be dimensioned and labeled as to their purposes and whether they will be public or private. Revise the plat appropriately. D.S. 2-03. 2.2.4.J. 18. After reviewing an aerial photo there is an existing structure on the property. Is the intent to demolish the structure? Please clarify in the response letter. Indicate the existing structure on the conceptual grading plan, sheet 3. If the structure will be demolished please label appropriately on the conceptual grading plan. DS 2-03.2.3.H. 19. Sidewalks must be flood free for up to the 10-yr. event. Add a note on the plan, "All roof down spouts on all structures must be routed under any adjacent sidewalk." DS 2-08.4.1.E. 20. In effort to determine if a grading permit is required include on the tentative plat estimated cut and fill quantities. If cut and fill quantities equal zero, please note on the plan. DS 2-02.2.1.A.17. 21. It is not clear what is being proposed in regards to vehicular access to the structures. Is the access a street or a PAAL? The access appears to be a PAAL. However general note 13 indicates a street is proposed. When accessing three or more lots a street is required. A street must meet DS 3-01 typical cross section for interior roads figure 1. The full ROW width for an interior road is 40 feet. From the plat view, when scaled the pavement and sidewalk width is only 35'. Revise the plat to show an interior road of 40'. Refer to Figure 1 in DS 3-01 for specific details. Label appropriately. Indicate if the street is private or public. LUC 3.2.8.3. 22. Parking is proposed within the turnaround area for the street. Per DS 3-016.2.C2. parking is not allowed in the turnaround area of a street. Revise the plat to show parking in a separate common area or revise the street to provide parking on the street. 23. Please note that depending on how each comment is addressed additional comments could be forthcoming on subsequent reviews. DRAINAGE STATEMENT COMMENTS 1. Indicate in the statement the offsite to onsite and onsite to offsite for the existing and proposed 100-peak discharge. Provide this information in the statement and show on the plat view the location of the discharge points and include the existing and proposed Q. |
| 06/06/2006 | FRODRIG2 | COT NON-DSD | REAL ESTATE | Approved | S06-101 Glenn Street Estates: Minor Subdivision Review - No comment. |
| 07/21/2006 | MICHAEL ST. PAUL | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL FROM: Michael St.Paul, Planning Technician PROJECT: S06-101 3644 East Glenn Street Minor Subdivision (Group B) TRANSMITTAL: July 21, 2006 COMMENTS: Please attach a response letter with the next submittal, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. An applicant has one (1) year form the date of application to obtain approval of a minor subdivision final plant that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application. This final plat must be approved and recorded on or before April 30, 2007. 2. This project was submitted to the pre-submittal meeting of October 5th of 2005 and was approved for submittal as Minor Subdivision under the Group B criteria (LUC Sections 4.2.2.2.A through .K). Please refer to the Land Use Code and that pre-submittal. The correct address is 3644 East Glenn Street. Please revise the Site Address on Sheet 1. 3. This is a Minor Subdivision. This is not a Development Plan. Please remove any reference to a Development Plan from all sheets. 4. A Minor Subdivision Plat must be prepared as a final plat (DS 2-03.9.2). There is also a brief description of the process for a Minor Subdivision in Development Standards 2-03.9.0. Please follow the "FINAL PLAT FORMAT AND CONTENT" in Development Standards beginning at Section 2-03.6.0. Additional information that would be provided on a Tentative Plat should be provided on separate sheets as part of your set of plans for the Minor Subdivision submittal. Only provide the required information for the Final Plat on the Final Plat. Look to the Tentative Plat requirements as a guide for any supplemental sheets (DS 2-03.2.0). It would be best to actually prepare a Tentative Plat as part of you submittal. 5. Please identify all the subdivisions by name in the location map and provide the book and page number of each plat (DS 2-03.6.1.D.2). 6. This subdivision plat has been assigned the number S06-101. Please place this number in the lower right corner or each sheet next to the title block (DS 2-03.6.1.K). 7. Provide the following statements at the beginning of the General Notes: "The gross area of this subdivision is _____ acres." (DS 2-03.6.2.A) "The total number of lots is ____." (DS 2-03.6.2.B) 8. Please revise General Note 13 to state "new public streets" and "new private streets" (DS 2-03.6.2.C). 9. Add the following note to the plat: "There will be no further division of lots without the expressed approval of the City of Tucson." (DS 2-03.6.2.H) 10. Please provide all the "Final Plat Standard Paragraphs" (DS 2-03.6.3.A through .E) on the plat. 11. If this subdivision is to have common areas, clearly identify, label, delineate and dimension each propose common area (DS 2-03.6.4.C). 12. If there are to be any dedications, clearly identify, delineate and dimension each propose dedication location and state the proposed use (DS 2-03.6.4.D). 13. It there are to be any common areas, such as a private street, provide Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) to provide for the maintenance of and liability for those proposed common areas (DS 2-03.6.6.A and .B). 14. Clearly delineate and dimension the proposed lot lines on the Final Plat and any supplemental sheets. (Please see Engineering Comment 11, by Patricia Gilbert.) 15. "Local streets must be designed with parking on both sides of the street, unless parking is provided in common areas distributed throughout the subdivision, at a ratio of one parking space per dwelling within the subdivision." (See DS 3-01.2.4.D. Also see Figure 2 - Typical Cross Section in DS 3-01.) Please revise the plat for compliance and fully dimension the proposed street on the plan. (Please see Traffic comment 4 by Dale Kelch.) 16. If you decide to use common area parking please demonstrate the following on the plat: "The distribution of visitor parking is uniformly located on site throughout the project for use by guests. Visitor parking spaces should be provided within one hundred fifty (150) feet of the front or street side yard property lines of each residential unit. Visitor parking cannot be located on a residentially zoned lot for use by other than the owner of the lot on which the parking is located." (See DS 3-05.2.4.A.1.) 17. The future right-of-way for Glenn Street is sixty-four (64) feet. The future curb location extends nine (9) feet into, and runs parallel to, the future right-of-way. Please provide, with dimensions, both the existing and future half right-of-ways along with the existing and future curb locations. Also provide the existing and future sight visibility triangles on the plat. (Please see Traffic comments 1 and 3 by Dale Kelch and Engineering comments 10 and 14 by Patricia Gilbert.) 18. No part of any proposed structure, including covered patios, can be built within the existing or future sight-visibility-triangle. In addition, the maximum height for a perimeter wall in thirty (30) inches within the sight-visibility-triangle (DS 3-01.5.1.A). 19. Each plot must be individually drawn, presented, reviewed and permitted. Please do not provide plot plans on the Final Plat. If you have specific model plans you are intending to use in this subdivision you provide typicals on one of the supplemental sheets. Nevertheless, individual plot plans shall be required. You may acquire a plot plan instruction sheet from the Zoning Review section of the counter. The appropriate scale of plot plans for lots this size would be one inch equals the feet (1" = 10'). 20. The proposed street has a projected ADT of fifty (50). This ADT allows for a reduced driveway length from the paved edge of the street and the parking structure with a maximum length of eight (8) feet. If under any condition that length cannot be design with a maximum of eight (8) feet, than the minimum length of the driveway must be eighteen (18) feet with an additional one (1) foot to the sidewalk (LUC Section 3.2.6.5.B.2.b and.a). 21. Lot numbers 1 and 5 depict driveway within the curb radii. The driveway must be four (4) feet from the beginning of the tangent for the radius of each curb. We are not able to provide a full review for a Minor Subdivision because neither a Final Plat nor a Tentative Plat has been provided with this submittal. In addition, there is some concern that the individual units for each lot may not meet the setback requirements. Please be aware that there may be additional comments relative to new information provided with subsequent submittals. |
| 07/25/2006 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES July 25, 2006 Tim McCann Tetra Tech, Inc., 33 North Stone Avenue, Suite 1500 Tucson, AZ 85701 Subject: S06-101 - Glenn Street Estates Final Plat Dear Tim: Your submittal of April 28, 2006 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a DETAILED cover letter explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLUELINES MUST BE FOLDED 9 Copies Revised Final Plat (Fire, Wastewater, Landscape, Addressing, Traffic, Assessor, Engineering, Zoning, DSD) 2 Copies Revised NPPO application (Landscape, DSD) 2 Copies Revised Drainage Statement (Engineering, DSD), 3 Copies CC&R's if required (Engineering, Zoning, DSD) Should you have any questions, please call me at 791-5608 ext. 1179. Sincerely, Patricia Y. Gehlen CDRC Manager All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: 884-5278 |