Plan Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Plan Number - S06-097
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 02/13/2007 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 03/13/2007 | KAY MARKS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Denied | 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 KAY MARKS ADDRESSING OFFICIAL PH: 740-6480 FAX #: 740-6370 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL SUBJECT: S06-097 THE LOFTS AT VILLA SAVONNA/REVISED TENTATIVE PLAT DATE: March 13, 2007 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and the following matters must be resolved prior to our approval: Correct Location Map scale per letters dated 05-22-06 & 11-07-06. Spell out all street suffixes except on Location Map per letters dated 05-22-06 & 11-07-06. jg |
| 03/14/2007 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1) Identify the species for each individual plant in the street landscape borders using symbols or other appropriate means. DS 2-07.2.2 2) Plant materials located within SVT's should consist of ground cover or low-growing vegetation of a species that will not grow higher than (30) inches. Select low growing plants for locations in the SVT. LUC 3.7.2.8 & DS 2-06 3) Revise the plans to meet the requirements while also complying with the sight visibility requirements. LUC Table 3.7.2-I 4) When the side(s) of a parking space abuts any vertical barrier over six (6) inches in height, the required width for the space is ten (10) feet to provide extra width to allow passengers to enter and exit the vehicle on the side where the barrier exists. DS 3.05.2.1.B.3 Revise the parking space width adjacent to the parking area screen wall along the central landscape area at Smoot Drive. 5) Revise the landscape plan to include the electrical installation or easement in the middle landscape border along Smoot Drive. Revise the planting plan as necessary to eliminate conflicts. DS 2-07.2.2.E.1, LUC 3.7.2.6.B 6) Submit the Native Plant Preservation Plans. Revise the plans as necessary use only plants suited to temporary inundation in the retention basin. LUC 3.7.4.3.A All Protected Native Plants shall be planted in locations able to support their long-term health and survival. LUC 3.8.6.6.C |
| 03/16/2007 | PATRICIA GILBERT | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | TO: Patricia Gehlen; CDRC Coordinator DATE: March 16, 2007 SUBJECT: Engineering review of the Lofts at Villa Savonna Tentative Plat. The activity number is S06-097. SUMMARY: The Tentative Plat and Drainage Report were received by Engineering on February 13th, 2007. Engineering has reviewed the received items and does not recommend approval of the Tentative Plat or the Drainage Report. RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: TENTATIVE PLAT, DRAINAGE REPORT APPROVED: GEOTECHINICAL REPORT (Soil's Report) The next submittal must address the following items: TENTATIVE PLAT 1. Show on the plat the wall that screens the parking area located at the entrance of the project, the wall is shown on the Landscape Plan but is not shown on the plat. 2. When the side(s) of a parking space abuts any vertical barrier over six (6) inches in height, the required width for the space is ten (10) feet to provide extra width to allow passengers to enter and exit the vehicle on the side where the barrier exists. The screen wall located adjacent to the parking spaces at the entrance do not meet this requirement. Revise the plat to comply. See Landscapes comment 4. DS 3.05.2.1.B.3 DRAINAGE REPORT COMMENTS 1. The proposed weighted runoff coefficient (0.48) provided in Appendix B in the Retention/Detention Basin Calculations is the coefficient used for moderately urban, which is for impervious surfaces that covers 35% of the watershed area. Sheet one on the plat shows the lot coverage at 58%. The provided proposed weighted runoff coefficient (0.48) is too low. Revise the drainage report to use the appropriate weighted runoff coefficient for the proposed development. Revise all applicable documents appropriately. |
| 03/28/2007 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES March 28, 2007 Thomas E. Guido, P.E. T & T Engineering, LLC. 5980 East Verde Place Tucson, AZ 85750 Subject: S06-097 The Lofts at Villa Savonna Tentative Plat Dear Thomas: Your submittal of February 13, 2007 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a DETAILED cover letter explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLUELINES MUST BE FOLDED 5 Copies Revised Tentative Plat (Addressing, Landscape, Engineering, Zoning, DSD) 4 Copies Revised Landscape Plans (Landscape, Engineering, Zoning, DSD), 2 Copies NPPO Plans (Landscape, DSD) 2 Copies Revised Drainage Report (Engineering, DSD) 2 Copies Elevations (Zoning, DSD) Should you have any questions, please call me at 791-5608 ext. 1179. Sincerely, Patricia Y. Gehlen CDRC Manager All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: 577-0929 |
| 03/28/2007 | HEATHER THRALL | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Heather Thrall Senior Planner PROJECT: S06-097, Lofts at Villa Savonna, 3808 N. 1st (administrative address) New residential subdivision, (Residential Cluster Project) Tentative Plat, 3rd review TRANSMITTAL DATE: March 27, 2007 DUE DATE: March 14, 2007 COMMENTS: 1. (last review) Per DS 2-10.3.1.B, provide a typical detail drawing for a corner lot and a lot nearest 1st Street (it appears there is no setback issue from 1st due to the great length the buildings are away from the future road widening) for record purposes. RESPONSE: Received typical detail, thank you. Provide typical detail for setbacks for lots next to hammer-head turn-arounds (lots 11, 12, 25), as this is still a part of the street. RESPONSE: The drawing provided on sheet 1 of the floor plan detail for a corner lot is not clear to me. Give me a detail like G/3 please. 2. (Per last review) Per DS 2-10.3.2.D, each lot is under 4000 sf, provide elevations to verify setbacks - measure from design grade to top of building - clarify if parapet roof. RESPONSE: I acknowledge the typical detail for the building elevation. Further details are needed, i.e. parapet, roof height? Provide building plans - ie. Optional porches? RESPONSE: The maximum height from grade to the top of the parapet can only be 19' to have the building meet the setbacks proposed. The elevations on sheet 3 do not include the parapet top - and setbacks will be an issue. 3. Per DS 2-10.3.2.E, provide CCRs. RESPONSE: I acknowledge the CCRs will be provided on a further submittal. RESPONSE: I'm sorry, I did not find a copy of the CCR's in this submittal, and I will need to review them before I can give an approval to this project. 4. Depending upon the responses given, further review comments may be forthcoming. Should you have any questions, email Heather.Thrall@tucsonaz.gov or 791-4541x1156. C:\planning\cdrc\tentativeplat\S06-097 lofts at villa savonna 3.doc RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised tentative plat, CC&R's and additional requested documents. |