Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Plan Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: REVISION - TENT PLAT & CORE RESUB
Plan Number - S06-094
Review Name: REVISION - TENT PLAT & CORE RESUB
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 09/02/2015 | KROBLES1 | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 09/04/2015 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: David Rivera Principal Planner PROJECT: S06-094 (2nd Review of the revised TP) 6307 S Alvernon Way Development Package - Tentative Plat, Desert View Plaza, Lots 1 -7 TRANSMITTAL DATE: September 8, 2015 DUE DATE: September 17, 2015 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. Follow up to previous comment 2: The email addresses of the registrants and owner/developer were not listed on the cover sheet as requested by the previous comment. List as required by Standard 2-01.3.1. 2-01.3.1 - The name, mailing and email addresses, and phone number of the primary property owner of the site, the developer of the project, registrant(s), and other person(s), firm(s), or organization(s) that prepared the development package documents shall be provided on the right half of the cover sheet. The applicable registration or license number shall be provided if prepared by or with the assistance of a registered professional, such as a surveyor, architect, landscape architect, or engineer. All sealing shall be consistent with Arizona Board of Technical Registration guidelines. 02. COMMENT: List on the cover sheet all registrants that prepared this development package include the information for each including the owner /developer as noted by the standard above. ****************************************************************************************** 2. Follow up to previous comment 8: The response to previous comment 8 is acknowledged. Once the easement have been abandoned and recorded, add the recordation information to the TP. 2-01.3.8.B - All easements shall be drawn on the plan. The recordation information, location, width, and purpose of all easements on site will be stated. Blanket easements should be listed in the notes, together with recordation data and their proposed status. Should an easement not be in use and be proposed for vacation or have been abandoned, so indicate. However, should the easement be in conflict with any proposed building location, vacation of the easement shall occur prior to approval of plan unless written permission from easement holder(s) is provided. 08. COMMENT: All easements must be abandoned prior to approval of the tentative plat. ****************************************************************************************** 3. Follow up to previous comment 13. The building setbacks listed on sheet two (2) under the "LOT SETBACK REQUIREMENTS" text block must be revised to state the following; the greatest of 21 feet or the height from the nearest edge of travel lane. The travel lane shall be drawn and labeled on sheets two (2) and three (3). The setbacks from Antrim Loop have not been correctly labeled on sheets two (2) or three (3). The key note (keynote B) for the building setback along Antrim Loop is labeled as 21 feet from the property line. Revise Keynote B on both sheets as noted above. 2-01.3.9.O - All applicable building setback lines, such as erosion hazard, floodplain detention/retention basins, and zoning, including sight visibility triangles, will be shown. 13. COMMENT: The street building setback for Antrim Loop and the unnamed street has been drawn and labeled incorrectly. The setback must be dimensioned from the Back of Future curb if the ADT is over 1,000 or from the nearest edge of travel lane if the ADT is 140 to 1,000. Revise the street building setback accordingly. ****************************************************************************************** 4. Follow up to previous comment 15b: The accessible ramp at the southwest corner of building four is not acceptable. There is no landing at the end of the ramp. Revise the ramp as required. 2-01.3.9.R - Show on-site pedestrian circulation as required by the LUC utilizing location and the design criteria in Development Standard 2-08.0. 15. COMMENT: Label the cross and running slopes for all sidewalks adjacent to the buildings. Buildings 1 - 4 have not been provided with accessible ramps at the accessible aisles next to the accessible parking spaces. Clarify if the sidewalk is flush with the pavement and if so, all parking spaces abutting the sidewalks will have to be provided with wheel stops. Draw and label the wheel stops and dimension the overhang if applicable. Accessible ramps must be provided at all transitions from crosswalks to sidewalks. Draw and label the types and dimension all detail drawings of the accessible ramps proposed. Include the slopes for each ramp detail. ****************************************************************************************** |
| 09/08/2015 | BVIESTE1 | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Approved | The Development Package has been reviewed on behalf of the Environmental Services Dept. and is approved. If there are any questions, I can be reached at kperry@perryengineering.net |
| 09/08/2015 | DAVID RIVERA | H/C SITE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | See zoning comments. |
| 09/08/2015 | JASON GREEN | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 09/16/2015 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 09/18/2015 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | This review has been completed and resubmittal is required. Please resubmit the following items: 1) Two rolled sets of the plans 2) All items requested by review staff 3) All items needed to approve this plan |
| 09/18/2015 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Completed | . |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/05/2015 | AROMERO4 | APPROVAL SHELF | Completed |