Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Plan Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: REVISION - TENT PLAT & CORE RESUB
Plan Number - S06-094
Review Name: REVISION - TENT PLAT & CORE RESUB
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 07/16/2015 | PGEHLEN1 | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 07/17/2015 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: David Rivera Principal Planner PROJECT: S06-094 6307 S Alvernon Way Development Package - Tentative Plat, Desert View Plaza, Lots 1 -7 TRANSMITTAL DATE: July 22, 2015 DUE DATE: July 30, 2015 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Development Package Standards listed in section 2-01 of the City of Tucson Development Standards. Also compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Land Use Code (LUC). The review comments include the actual standard first with the applicable Development Standard Section number and the following paragraph is the actual "COMMENT" related to the specific item that must be addressed. If you need to review the sections listed below click on the link or copy it in the address bar of your internet program. http://cms3.tucsonaz.gov/files/planning/Development_Stds.pdf This link will take you directly to the section used for the standards review. The LUC requirements can be found at the following link: http://cms3.tucsonaz.gov/files/planning/Complete_LUC_Sept 2012.pdf 2-01.2.4 - A title block shall be provided in the lower right quadrant of each sheet. 01. COMMENT: The title block on the landscape sheets must match the title block on sheets 1 -6. Revise the title block on the landscape sheets. ****************************************************************************************** 2-01.3.1 - The name, mailing and email addresses, and phone number of the primary property owner of the site, the developer of the project, registrant(s), and other person(s), firm(s), or organization(s) that prepared the development package documents shall be provided on the right half of the cover sheet. The applicable registration or license number shall be provided if prepared by or with the assistance of a registered professional, such as a surveyor, architect, landscape architect, or engineer. All sealing shall be consistent with Arizona Board of Technical Registration guidelines. 02. COMMENT: List on the cover sheet all registrants that prepared this development package include the information for each including the owner /developer as noted by the standard above. ****************************************************************************************** 2-01.3.2 - The title block shall include the following information. 2-01.3.3 - Relevant case numbers (development package document, rezoning, board of adjustment, DDO, MDR, DSMR, overlay, etc.) shall be provided adjacent to the title block on each sheet. 03. COMMENT: This project has been assigned the original case number S06-094. Revise the case number to a larger font and in bold. ****************************************************************************************** 2-01.3.7.A. Zoning and Land Use Notes. 2-01.3.7.A.3 - If the plan/plat has been prepared in conjunction with a rezoning application, add the following note next to the existing zoning note: "Proposed zoning is ____." List the applicable rezoning file number and conditions of approval. Also place the C9-__-__ (if applicable) and the plan/plat file numbers in the lower right corner of each sheet. 04. COMMENT: It is acknowledged that this site has changed in property boundary and development design. Provide documentation from Glenn Moyer or John Beall that the revised site design is still consistent with the previously approved PDP. ****************************************************************************************** 2-01.3.7.A.4 - Identify the existing and proposed use of the property as classified per the Land Use Code. List all Land Use Code sections each proposed use is subject to. 05. COMMENT: Revise general note 6 to include the new use "Food Service". List all applicable subject to sections for each proposed use as noted by the standard above. ****************************************************************************************** 2-01.3.7.A.6.c - If the property includes Protected Riparian Area add a note stating that the project is designed to comply with Development Standard 9-06.0., specifying all lots impacted and including a total for the regulated area and the Protected Riparian Area. 06. COMMENT: This site may be required to go through an overlay application due to an identified PC Riparian Habitat over the existing property. Follow up with Joseph Linville, Landscape Plans reviewer for more information related to this comment. ****************************************************************************************** 2-01.3.7.C.2 - List the following note on all development package documents: "No structure or vegetation shall be located or maintained so as to interfere with the sight visibility triangles in accordance with Development Standard 3-01.0." 07. COMMENT: Revise general note 22 to state (verbatim) what is noted in the standard above. ****************************************************************************************** 2-01.3.8.B - All easements shall be drawn on the plan. The recordation information, location, width, and purpose of all easements on site will be stated. Blanket easements should be listed in the notes, together with recordation data and their proposed status. Should an easement not be in use and be proposed for vacation or have been abandoned, so indicate. However, should the easement be in conflict with any proposed building location, vacation of the easement shall occur prior to approval of plan unless written permission from easement holder(s) is provided. 08. COMMENT: All easements must be abandoned prior to approval of the tentative plat. ****************************************************************************************** 2-01.3.9 - Information on Proposed Development. The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes. 2-01.3.9.A - Draw in all proposed lot lines with approximate distances and measurements. 09. Draw and label the property lines on the tentative plat sheets and label the distance and bearings for each lot line. ****************************************************************************************** 2-01.3.9.B - Identify each block or lot by number within the subdivision boundary and include the approximate square footage of each, or a note may be provided stating that all lots comply with the minimum lot size requirements. 10. COMMENT: The lot numbers shall be labeled on the tentative plat sheets. ****************************************************************************************** 2-01.3.9.H - Proposed traffic circulation: 2-01.3.9.H.5.a - Show all motor vehicle off-street parking spaces provided fully dimensioned. As a note, provide calculations on the number of spaces required (include the ratio used) and the number provided, including the number of spaces required and provided for the physically disabled. The drawing should indicate parking space locations for the physically disabled. A typical parking space detail shall be provided for both standard parking spaces and those for the physically disabled. For information on parking requirements for the physically disabled, refer to adopted building and accessibility codes of the City of Tucson. Design criteria for parking spaces and access are located in Development Standard 3-05.0. 11. COMMENT: Label the angle and length of the parking spaces provided for building #4. Draw and label the wheel stops where the parking spaces abut a landscape area or sidewalk. Specifically the landscape area just south of Building #5 and where the parking spaces abut the sidewalks and landscape areas at Buildings 1 - 4. Label the width of the drive-through lanes for buildings 1- 4. Draw and label the locations of menu order board and pick up windows for the restaurants where the locations have not been provided. ****************************************************************************************** 2-01.3.9.H.5.c - Show all loading zones, and vehicle maneuverability fully dimensioned, and access route, and provide, as a note, the number of loading spaces required, the number provided, and the design vehicle. 12. COMMENT: Label the size of each loading zone. Revise the parking data matrix tables to correctly list the number of loading zones proposed for Phase I. The matrix table for Phase I indicates 1 loading zone has been provided, yet on sheet 3, 2 loading zones have been depicted next to buildings 5 and 6. Revise the Phase I table as required. ****************************************************************************************** 2-01.3.9.H.5.d - Show bicycle parking facilities fully dimensioned. For specifics, refer to Development Standard 2-09.0. Provide, as a note, calculations for Class I and Class II bicycle spaces required and provided. 13. COMMENT: The short term bicycle parking detail drawings must be revised to correctly depict the design criteria and facility type. The proposed short term facility type is not acceptable. Draw an elevation detail of the short term facility. Label the distance from the short term facilities to the main public entrance of the buildings. The maximum distance is 50 Feet. Public entrances to all building must be drawn and labeled in order to verify that the 50-foot distance has been met. The B-1 bicycle facility for building #7 is not visible. Revise the plan to provide legibility of the B-1 facility. ****************************************************************************************** 2-01.3.9.O - All applicable building setback lines, such as erosion hazard, floodplain detention/retention basins, and zoning, including sight visibility triangles, will be shown. 13. COMMENT: The street building setback for Antrim Loop and the unnamed street has been drawn and labeled incorrectly. The setback must be dimensioned from the Back of Future curb if the ADT is over 1,000 or from the nearest edge of travel lane if the ADT is 140 to 1,000. Revise the street building setback accordingly. ****************************************************************************************** 2-01.3.9.Q - Provide the square footage and the height of each commercial, industrial, or business structure and the specific use proposed within the footprint of the building(s). 14. COMMENT: It is not clear where the caretaker's residence is within building #9. Define the area of the residence and clarify the square footage of the caretakers building in the Phase III Matrix table. If building #9 is only 3,816 square feet how can the square footage for the caretaker's residence be 74,678 square feet? ****************************************************************************************** 2-01.3.9.R - Show on-site pedestrian circulation as required by the LUC utilizing location and the design criteria in Development Standard 2-08.0. 15. COMMENT: Label the cross and running slopes for all sidewalks adjacent to the buildings. Buildings 1 - 4 have not been provided with accessible ramps at the accessible aisles next to the accessible parking spaces. Clarify if the sidewalk is flush with the pavement and if so, all parking spaces abutting the sidewalks will have to be provided with wheel stops. Draw and label the wheel stops and dimension the overhang if applicable. Accessible ramps must be provided at all transitions from crosswalks to sidewalks. Draw and label the types and dimension all detail drawings of the accessible ramps proposed. Include the slopes for each ramp detail. ****************************************************************************************** 2-01.3.9.S - Show on-site pedestrian refuge areas per Development Standard 3-05. 2-01.3.9.T - Show existing or proposed pedestrian circulation along abutting rights-of-way. Such sidewalks must comply with accessibility requirements for the physically disabled and the design criteria in Development Standard 3-01.0. Show refuse collection areas, including locations of dumpsters, screening location and materials, and vehicle maneuverability, fully dimensioned, and access route. If dumpster service is not proposed, indicate type of service. For specific information on refuse collection, refer to Development Standard 6-01.0. Refuse collection on all projects shall be designed based on that Standard, even if collection is to be contracted to a private firm. 16. COMMENT: Show the access route to the dumpster from Building #8. The access route to the dumpster location from buildings # 5 and #6 appears to be less than four feet between a parked vehicle and the bike lockers. Add a dimension to clarify the distance between the parked car and the bike lockers for these 2 locations. If necessary relocate the locker to provide a clear 4-foot path to the dumpster. There does not appear to be any trash enclosure proposed for the Phase III development. Per the standard above, if dumpster service is not proposed indicate the type of service that will be provided. ****************************************************************************************** 2-01.3.9.V - For gang mailboxes indicate location to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements, such as pedestrian accessibility, utilities, and landscaping. 17. COMMENT: Indicate on the plan the location of any gang mailbox areas if applicable. If no gang mailboxes are proposed add a general note stating that mail service is to be provided to each individual suite or building. ****************************************************************************************** 2-01.3.9.W - Indicate the locations and types of proposed signs (wall, free-standing, pedestal) to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements and that minimal locational requirements can be met. Indicate if there are any existing billboards on site. Compliance to LUC Sec. 3.5.4.26 may be required. 18. COMMENT: Zoning could not verify if any freestanding monument signs were proposed for this development. If freestanding signs are proposed draw and label the sign locations and add a note that the signs will be permitted under separate permit. ****************************************************************************************** 2-01.3.9.X - Show compliance with landscaping and screening requirements by locations, material descriptions, and dimensions. Specific plant or hardscape material shall be detailed on a landscape plan. A detailed landscape plan is required. For more specific information, refer to Development Standard 2-07.0. 19. COMMENT: See the landscape reviewer comments related to landscape buffers and screening. ****************************************************************************************** |
| 07/23/2015 | PGEHLEN1 | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Passed | Per RWRD e-mail in PRO |
| 07/23/2015 | DAVID RIVERA | H/C SITE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | see zoning comments. |
| 07/23/2015 | JASON GREEN | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | DATE: July 23, 2015 DUE DATE: July 30, 2015 SUBJECT: Desert View Plaza TP/DP- Engineering Review LOCATION: 6307 S Alvernon Way REVIEWERS: Jason Green, CFM ACTIVITY: S06-094 SUMMARY: Engineering Division of Planning & Development Services Department has received and reviewed the proposed Tentative Plat/Development Plan, Drainage Report (Baker & Associates Engineering, Inc., 30JUN15), and Geotechnical Evaluation (Western Technology Inc., 23DEC04 and Addendum 25JUN06). Engineering Division does not recommend approval of the TP/DP at this time. The following items need to be addressed: SITE PLAN: 1) DS Sec.2-01: Revise the plan set, specifically Sheets 4 & 5 to remove the words "Prel. Improvement Plan" from the sheets. 2) DS Sec.3-01.3.3.A: Revise the plan set to dimension the required 5-foot sidewalk for the proposed pedestrian access connection within the public right-of-way. 3) LUC Sec.3.3.6.4: Revise the plan set to label and dimension all areas of the new angled parking adjacent to Building #4 per Figure 3.3.6.4.A-I and Table 3.3.6.4.A-II. 4) DS Sec.3-01.5.3: Revise the plan set to dimension the existing and future SVTs at all driveway entrance and the adjacent roadway. Provide the Far Side SVT for the intersection of the Unnamed Roadway and Valencia Road along with the new driveway location(s) onto the Unnamed Roadway. 5) LUC Sec.3.3.6.6.B.1.b: Revise the plan set to label and dimension all proposed drive thru access lanes along with the required 1-foot setback from the drive-thru lane to all associated buildings, specifically Buildings "1", "2", "3", "4", "5", "6", and "7." 6) LUC Sec.3.3.6.6.D: Revise the plan set to label and dimension all aspects of the proposed back-up spur adjacent to Building #9, Refer to Illustration 3.3.6.6.D. 7) DS Sec.10-02.10.3.4 & 9: Revise the plan set to label the existing infrastructure within the public right-of-way of the "Unnamed" Roadway. Per the improvement plans within the Drainage Report the existing storm drains are reinforced concrete pipes (RCP). GENERAL COMMENTS: Please provide a revised Tentative Plat/Development Plan that addresses the comments provided above. Include a comprehensive response letter addressing in detail responses to all of the above comments. For any questions or to schedule meetings call me at 837-4929. Jason Green, CFM Senior Engineer Associate Engineering Division Planning & Development Services Department |
| 07/24/2015 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | The rim elevation of the next upstream sanitary manhole (MH #2, 2641.6') from building #9 is less than 12" below the first floor elevation (2642.0'). Provide a note on the plans requiring the installation of a backwater valve. Reference: Section 715.1, IPC 2012, as amended by the City of Tucson. |
| 07/28/2015 | ZELIN CANCHOLA | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Approved | |
| 07/29/2015 | PGEHLEN1 | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Reqs Change | The revised Tentative Plat has been reviewed on behalf of the Environmental Services Dept. Please address the following on the resubmittal: 1. Center the two double enclosures for Buildings 2 and 3 in Phase One with the north/south PAALs they are approached and serviced from per TSM 8-01.5.3.H. 2. As mentioned in the zoning comments, provide refuse enclosure(s) in Phase 3. If there are any questions, I can be reached at kperry@perryengineering.net |
| 07/29/2015 | KBROUIL1 | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Completed | |
| 07/30/2015 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Revise the plans to provide screening per UDC Table 7.6.4.-1 |
| 08/03/2015 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | This review has been completed and resubmittal is required. Please resubmit the following items: 1) Two rolled sets of the plans 2) All items requested by review staff 3) All items needed to approve this plan |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 08/05/2015 | AROMERO4 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |